Printer Friendly

Forage supply in thinned Caatinga enriched with buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) grazed by goats and sheep/Oferta de forragem em Caatinga raleada e enriquecida com capim buffel (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) pastejada por ovinos e caprinos.


The potential of annual dry matter (DM) production of the Caatinga from the above-ground forage of herbs, shrubs and trees reaches 4 x 103 kg [ha.sup.-1] (ARAUJO FILHO et al., 2002). However, most of it is not available to animals unless certain management practices are used, such as Caatinga thinning and enrichment (BAKKE et al., 2010).

Caatinga enrichment consists of removal, at the end of the dry season, of shrubs and tree species that produce no forage, control of their sprouts in order to reduce tree canopy shading to 15% of the soil surface in the following rainy season, and seeding desirable forage-producing herb species. This management practice allows the growth of the native and introduced herb species, increasing the availability of better quality forage and nutritional factor in animal performance (CARVALHO JUNIOR et al., 2011). Buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) is the most utilized species to enrich semiarid areas of Northeast Brazil. Its use increases grass DM production and availability, while partially preserving the forage supply of dicotyledonous herbs. Ultimately, more nutrients are made available to improve animal performance.

It has been shown that the carrying capacity of grass-enriched Caatinga sites is increased to 10 sheep or goats [ha.sup.-1], resulting in an annual live body weight increase of 90 to 110 kg [ha.sup.-1] (ARAUJO FILHO et al., 2002).

In addition to DM availability, studies on forage production in Caatinga should consider other factors, such as plant species frequency, rate of biomass accumulation and forage supply. That is because during the rainy period of the year, seasonal dominant herb species show fast growth and short life cycle, resulting in forage excess and shortage during the wet and dry season, respectively. The continuous grazing system commonly adopted in the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil is unsuitable to this pattern of forage production, and results in quantitative and qualitative losses.

The few studies on sheep and goat grazing effects on Caatinga sites concluded that sheep and goat grazing pressure on grasses and dicotyledonous forage species, respectively, in successive years, can exclude these components from pastures, especially those with higher nutritive value. Thus, it is important to study DM supply from herbs, especially following Caatinga enrichment by an exotic grass species submitted to grazing by small ruminants.

This study evaluated dry matter supply from herb species in a thinned Caatinga site enriched with buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), under goat and sheep grazing.

Material and methods

The experiment was carried out at the Experimental Station of the Federal University of Campina Grande-CSTR, in Santa Terezinha municipality, in the Sertao Paraibano physiographic zone. Soil types are irregularly mixed or associated with relief conditions. Dominant soil types are non-calcic and planosols, although dystrophic entisols are eventually observed as well.

According to the Koppen classification, the regional climate is BShw'--semiarid with short summer-fall rainy season, with rainfall concentrated in March and April. Total annual precipitation ranges from 150 to 1,300 mm, and mean annual precipitation, based on long-term data, is 500 mm. Average, minimum and maximum temperatures are 28, 22 and 35[degrees]C, respectively. Average air moisture is 60%. During the experiment, monthly rainfall values were 88.0, 14.7, 17.2, 0.0, 5.5 and 0.0 for May, June, July, August, September and October, respectively.

Shrubs and trees were selectively cut from the experimental area in December 2007 to ensure 15% of soil cover by the canopies of woody species (BAKKE et al., 2010; PEREIRA FILHO; BAKKE, 2010), while buffel grass seeding occurred in February 2008.

Twelve 1/2-Boer goats and 12 Santa Ines lambs with 15 kg of live body weight (LW) were used in the experiment. They were identified by numbered colored collars and received routine vaccines and purge treatment for endo- and ectoparasites.

The 2.4 ha experimental area was divided in four 0.6 ha paddocks that received six goats or six lambs when estimated forage DM availability reached 2,000 kg. Animals had ad libitum access to containers with complete mineral mixture and water in each paddock.

Vegetation was evaluated by randomly sampling 0.25 x 1.0 m plots in each paddock (ARAUJO FILHO et al., 2002) on June 1, July 1, August 1, September 1 and October 1. The frequency of each species was determined based on the percentage of plots where each species was observed.

Dry matter availability, accumulation rate and supply were estimated on July 1, August 1, September 1 and October 1. After collection, fresh plant biomass was sorted out in three categories (buffel grass, herbaceous dicotyledons and other grasses), cut into pieces, stored in plastic bags and weighed. Sampling intensity in each paddock and date totaled 20 points randomized on the North-South and East-West transects crisscrossing the central point of each 0.6 ha area.

Forage accumulation rate ([TAC.sub.j]) and supply were estimated from data collected in 1.0 x 1.0 m exclusion areas where no goat or sheep was allowed to graze, using the following equations:

[TAC.sub.j] = (DG - FG) [n.sup.-1] (CAMPBELL, 1966),

[TAC.sub.j] = daily DM accumulation rate in kg [hA.sup.-1], in the j-th replication,

DG = forage biomass inside the exclusion area in kg [ha.sup.-1] (DM basis),

FG = forage biomass outside the exclusion area in kg [ha.sup.-1], (DM basis), and n=number of days.

Accumulation rate values were estimated on July 1, August 1, September 1 and October 1, and corresponded to the previous 30 days of forage growth.

OF = [([MF1 + MF2/n] + TAC/CA)] x 100


OF = forage biomass supply (DM basis) in kg 100 [kg.sup.-1] of live body weight;

Frequency of herbaceous species under grazing

[MF.sub.1] = forage biomass (DM basis) at day 1;

MF2 = forage biomass (DM basis) at the last day (y) of the period;

n = number of days between day 1 and day "y";

TAC = daily DM accumulation rate in kg [ha.sup.-1], and CA = mean daily animal allotment in the period, in kg of LBW [ha.sup.-1].

Treatments were assigned to plots (paddocks) according to a completely random design with two treatments (goat and sheep) and four replications of six animals, and repeated measures over time (four dates in July, August, September and October) and data were analyzed by the ANOVA technique, and means were compared by the ANOVA F test or by Tukey's test methodology (p < 0.10) using SAS (2004).

Results and discussion

Herb species were more frequent in June than later in the year, due to better environmental conditions (soil moisture from rainfall) (Table 1). More than one species showed high frequency and was present in more than 50% of the samples, especially buffel grass in both goat- and sheep-grazed areas, demonstrating its resistance to grazing, adaptation to regional climate and suitability to enrich thinned Caatinga sites. Andropogon gayanus, an exotic grass species, was observed in all dates and increased frequency (5 to 20%) in goat-grazed areas, while decreasing its frequency (0 to 10%) in sheep-grazed areas. This trend was expected, as goats prefer forage from shrubs, trees, herbaceous dicotyledons and grasses, in that order (PEREIRA FILHO; BAKKE, 2010).

Other grass species, except Cenchrus ciliaris and Aristida setifolia, were not observed on sheep-grazed areas from August onward, as a result of the grass preference of this animal species and reduced soil moisture.

Changes in herb community were characterized by a general frequency increase of undesirable species. For example, Aristida setifolia, a grass that produces low quality forage, increased frequency from 15% in June to 55% in September, in sheep-grazed areas. Malvastrum coromandelianum, a dicotyledonous bush, showed a similar trend, and was observed during the dry season.

Grass frequency was higher in the goat grazed paddocks, as these animals prefer to forage on dicotyledons. Frequency change of dicotyledons was not observed in such a high degree in either sheep or goat-grazed areas. This may be explained by the findings of Bartolome et al. (1998). These authors state that sheep and goat are opportunistic grazers (i.e.: they change their feeding behavior according to plant diversity). Also, it can be explained by the higher drought resistance and low nutricional value (FORMIGA et al., 2011), or longer phenological cycle (PEREIRA FILHO; BAKKE, 2010).

The main legume species were Rhychosia minima, Centrosema sp., Indigofera anil, Arachis pintoi, Stylosanthes guianensis, and other non-legume species such as Hyptis suaveolens, Amaranthus sp. and Ipomoea sp. showed higher frequency in June, at the end of the raining season, afterwards diminished their participation, and ultimately some of them disappeared after August. Probably, this is a negative effect associated with climate, soil, trampling and short life cycle of plants.

The only two plant species observed in the sheep and goat-grazed areas at all data collection dates were Cenchrus ciliaris and Aristida setifolia (grasses), and Rhychosia minima and Hyptis suaveolens (dicotyledon), probably a direct effect of the good resistance of these species to the environmental conditions of the region. In general, disappearance of herb species in either sheep or goat grazed paddocks proved to be related to the dry season.

Dry matter availability and buffel grass frequency were higher in the sheep-grazed area than in the goat-grazed area (p < 0.10) (Table 2). This is unexpected, and was likely due to a change in the feeding behavior of those animals. According to Piazzetta et al. (2009), grazing lambs are able to balance their diet with grasses and dicotyledons in order to improve the quality of ingested food, especially when there is floristic diversity (ANIMUT et al., 2005). This kind of behavior was observed by Champion et al. (2004) in sheep grazing on clover or ilex. The animals spent 57% of the time grazing on clover, which resulted in 62% of the total ingested food. On the other hand, it is possible that goats, due to their food intake ability, learned to selected more leafy forage from grasses than sheep (TAVARES et al., 2005), corroborating reports by Bremm et al. (2005) that higher levels of leaf availability affect grazing behavior and animals ingest a higher-quality diet to fulfill their nutrient requirements.

In general, DM availability (kg [ha.sup.-1]) of grasses other than buffel grass was low (maximum of 148 kg [ha.sup.-1]), and showed no differences between sheep or goat-grazed areas. It is possible that enrichment with buffel grass reduced the contribution from other grasses, although it provided a great amount of total available forage.

The greater participation (%) of dicotyledons and other grasses in goat-grazed areas (Table 2) should be due to the great quantity of buffel grass. This induced or allowed a more intense selection of this forage instead of that from dicotyledons. Also, goats are known to be opportunistic grazers (BARTOLOME et al., 1998) and may change their feeding behavior depending on pasture composition.

This may be related to animal forage selection, especially considering the presence of grass species of low nutritive value, such as Aristida setifolia, (FORMIGA et al., 2011).

There was no significant (p > 0.10) effect of sheep or goat on DM accumulation rate of buffel grass, dicotyledons and other grasses, however the 4.4 DM accumulation rate of other grasses in goat-grazed areas showed to be higher (p < 0.10) than the 2.2 rate value estimated for the sheep-grazed areas, showing sheep preference to forage from native grasses, while goats prefer buffel grass forage.

Buffel grass forage supply was higher (p < 0.10) in sheep-grazed areas than in goat-grazed areas: 32.9 vs. 13.3 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]. This may be associated with sheep refusal to consume this grass forage and preference to ingesting more nutritive dicotyledonous forage. In goat-grazed areas, dicotyledon supply was significantly (p < 0.10) higher than in sheep-grazed areas.

Interaction was significant (p < 0.10) for DM availability of dicotyledons (Table 3). In July and August it was higher in goat-grazed areas, while in October it was higher in sheep-grazed areas.

Sheep--or goat-grazed areas showed higher forage availability in July 1 than in the other months, possibly as a consequence of the decrease in soil moisture from July onward, which can be corroborated by the gradual decrease in dicotyledon frequency. According to Animut et al. (2005), this dynamic balance between grass and dicotyledonous herbaceous forage may change selectivity by sheep and goats during the year.

Buffel grass DM availability (Table 4) did not change significantly from July to October, and ranged from 682.5 (October 1) to 1091.3 kg [ha.sup.-1] (September 1). Moreira et al. (2007), in a rotational grazing study with cattle, reported buffel grass dry mater availability ranging from 5908.1 to 3076.5 kg [ha.sup.-1]. These values for dry mater availability in grazed or ungrazed areas indicate the high resistance of buffel grass to the environmental conditions of the semiarid region of northeast Brazil, and its exceptional sprouting capacity after grazing (ALBUQUERQUE et al., 2002). Depending on rainfall quantity and distribution, forage maturation is accelerated or retarded (ARAUJO FILHO et al., 2002).

Dry mater availability of the other grasses averaged 74.8 kg [ha.sup.-1] in July, significantly (p < 0.10) lower than the 243.6 kg [ha.sup.-1] average observed in October, and similar to the values reported for August and September. This may be related to animal forage selection, especially considering the presence of grass species of low nutritive value, such as Aristida setifolia.

Total DM availability on July 1 (3397.6 kg [ha.sup.-1]) was higher (p < 0.10) than in August, September and October. That value was close to the 4000 kg [ha.sup.-1] reported by Araujo Filho et al. (2002) as the potential of DM production in thinned Caatinga sites. Although dry mater availability decreased between July and August, and from August to October (p < 0.10) when it reached a minimum value of 1413.0 kg [ha.sup.-1], forage availability are considerably high for semiarid regions.

Buffel grass accounted for 22.7% in July, significantly (p < 0.10) less than September and October values (52.8 and 40.9%, respectively). Dicotyledons showed an opposite trend: higher (p < 0.10) participation in July (74.8%) than in September (40.3%) or October (36.2%), probably due to high diversity especially of legume species (PEREIRA FILHO et al., 2007) that normally show a high nutritive value and, for that reason, were grazed more intensely by sheep and goats, and thus grass forage increased its participation. Also, soil moisture is expected to decrease continuously from July to October after the end of the rainy season in late June to early July, and grasses demand less water to grow than herbaceous dicotyledons. These climate and plant characteristic can further explain the reported changes in grasses and dicotyledons DM availability from July to October.

Buffel grass dry mater accumulation rate did not change significantly (p > 0.10) from July to October. Dry mater accumulation rates of dicotyledons were similar (p > 0.10) from July to September, but decreased (p < 0.10) from September to October. Certainly, this results from the decrease in soil moisture after the end of the rainy season in late June to early July. Also, physiological maturation also affects DM accumulation rate of plants. For example, according to Cauduro et al. (2006), the accumulation rate of leaves decreases after flowering.

The highest DM accumulation rate value of other grasses was observed in October, and this value was significantly (p < 0.10) higher than July and August values, which were similar (p > 0.10). This higher value observed in October results from the expected maturation of forage from other grasses and the high frequency of Aristida setifolia among other grasses. Together, these factors render forage unpalatable and induce animals to express their selective ability to consume leaf and tender grass stalks (PARIS et al., 2008).

No significant (p > 0.10) differences were observed between months for buffel grass dry mater supply. This grass has proved to be highly adapted to soil and climate conditions of the semiarid region of northeast Brazil, persisting in pasture under adequate grazing pressure and showing stable forage production during almost all of the year (DANTAS NETO et al., 2000; SANTOS et al., 2005).

Dicotyledon dry mater supply decreased (p < 0.10) progressively from July (66.1 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LV [day.sup.-1]) to August-September and October (16.5 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]). Probably, this decrease results from preferable grazing of the more palatable and nutritive value of dicotyledons and from natural disappearance of dicotyledons with short life cycles. Aroeira et al. (2005) explain that decreases in legume species in mixed pastures may result from water, light and nutrients competition exerted by grasses.

Dry matter supply from other grasses decreased (p < 0.10) from July (8.3kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]) to August (2.8 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]) and returned to July levels in October (7.5 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]). This reflects the drought resistance of grasses (RIBASKI; MENEZES, 2002) or the presence of nutritionally poor or less palatable grasses (NEVES et al., 2009).

Total DM supply in July (94.2 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]) was higher (p < 0.1) than that observed in August (69.7 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]), September (62.6 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]) and October (49.0 kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1]). August total DM supply was similar (p > 0.10) to September and higher (p < 0.10) than the October value, while September and October values were similar (p > 0.10). This decrease may be associated to a high pressure grazing on the most preferable plant species, which also affects diet quality and the persistence of the overgrazed species (CARVALHO; MORAES, 2005). Again, total dry mater supply followed the same trend observed for dicotyledons, showing how important these species were on determining forage supply.


Termination of sheep and goats in thinned Caatinga enriched with Cenchrus ciliaris favored some undesired species such as the grass Aristida setfolia and decreased availability, accumulation rate and DM supply of herbaceous dicotyledons, but did not decrease forage availability of Cenchrus ciliaris, and forage accumulation rate and DM supply. Availability of Cenchrus ciliaris forage was not affected between July and October, while changes in DM accumulation rate and supply of dicotyledon and other grasses were observed in that period.

Doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.12548


ALBUQUERQUE, A. W.; LOMBARDI NETO, F.; SRINIVASAN, V. S.; SANTOS, J. R. Manejo da cobertura do solo e de praticas conservacionistas nas perdas de solo e agua em Sume, Paraiba. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v. 6, n. 1, p. 136-141, 2002.

ANIMUT, G.; GOETSCH, A. L.; AIKEN, G. E. Grazing behavior and energy expenditure by sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates. Small Ruminant Research, v. 59, n. 2-3, p. 191-201, 2005.

ARAUJO FILHO, J. A.; CARVALHO, F. C.; GARCIA, R.; SOUSA, R. A. Efeitos da manipulacao da vegetacao lenhosa sobre a producao e compartimentalizacao da fitomassa pastavel de uma caatinga sucessional. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 31, n. 1, p. 11-19, 2002.

AROEIRA, L. J. M.; PACIULLO, D. S. C.; LOPES, F. C. F.; MORENZ, M. J. F.; SALIBA, E. S.; SILVA, J. J.; DUCATTI, C. Disponibilidade, composicao bromatologica e consumo de materia seca em pastagem consorciada de Brachiaria decumbens com Stylosanthes guianensis. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 40, n. 4, p. 413-418, 2005.

BAKKE, O. A.; PEREIRA FILHO, J. M.; BAKKE, I. A.; CORDAO, M. A. Producao e utilizacao da forragem de especies lenhosas da caatinga. In: GARIGLIO, M. A.; SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B.; CESTARO, L. A.; KAGEYAMA, P. Y. (Org.). Uso sustentavel e conservacao dos recursos florestais da Caatinga. Brasilia: Servico Florestal Brasileiro, 2010. p. 160-173.

BARTOLOME, J.; FRANCH, J.; PLAIXATS, J.; SELIGMAN, N. G. Diet selection by sheep and goats on Mediterranean heath-woodland range. Journal of Range Management, v. 51, n. 4, p. 383-391, 1998.

BREMM, C.; ROCHA, M. G.; RASTLE, J.; PILAU, A.; MONTAGNER, D. B.; FREITAS, F. K.; MACARI, S.; ELEJALDE, D. A. G.; ROSO, D.; ROMAN, J.; GUTERRES, E. P.; COSTA, V. G.; NEVES, F. P. Efeito de niveis de suplementacao sobre o comportamento ingestivo de bezerras em pastagem de Aveia (Avena strigosa Schreb.) e Azevem (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 34, n. 2, p. 387-397, 2005.

CAMPBELL, A. G. Grazed pastures parameters: I Pasture dry matter production and availability in a stocking rate grazing management experiment with dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, v. 67, n. 2, p. 211-216, 1966.

CARVALHO, P. C. F.; MORAES, A. Comportamento ingestivo de Ruminantes: bases para o manejo sustentavel do pasto. In: CECATO, U.; JOBIM, C. C. (Org.). Manejo Sustentavel em Pastagem. Maringa: Eduem, 2005. v. 1, p. 1-20.

CARVALHO JUNIOR, A. M.; PEREIRA FILHO, J. M.; SILVA, R. M.; SILVA, A. M. A.; CEZAR, M. F. Effect of supplementation on the performance of F1 crossbred goats finished in native pasture. Revista Brasileira Zootecnia, v. 40, n. 11, p. 2510-2517, 2011.

CAUDURO, G. F.; CARVALHO, P. C. F.; BARBOSA, C. M. P.; LUNARDI, R.; NABINGER, C.; GONCALVES, E. N.; THAIS, D. Variaveis morfogenicas e estruturais de azevem anual (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) manejado sob diferentes intensidades e metodos de pastejo. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1298-1307, 2006.

CHAMPION, R. A.; ORR, R. J.; PENNING, P. D.; RUTTER, S. M. The effect of the spatial scale of heterogeneity of two herbage species on the grazing behaviour of lactating sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v. 88, n. 1, p. 61-76, 2004.

DANTAS NETO, J.; SILVA, F. A. S.; FURTADO, D. A.; MATOS, J. A. Influencia da precipitacao e idade da planta na producao e composicao quimica do capim buffel. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 35, n. 9, p. 413-420, 2000.

FORMIGA, L. D. A. S.; PEREIRA FILHO, J. M.; OLIVEIRA, N. S.; SILVA, A. M. A.; CEZAR, M. F.; SOARES, D. C. Valor nutritivo da vegetacao herbacea de caatinga enriquecida e pastejada por ovinos e caprinos. Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal, v. 12, n. 2, p. 403-415, 2011.

MOREIRA, J. N.; LIRA, M. A.; SANTOS, M. V. F.; ARAUJO, G. G. L.; SILVA, G. C. Potencial de producao de capim buffel na epoca seca no semi-arido pernambucano. Caatinga, v. 20, n. 3, p. 22-29, 2007.

NEVES, F. P.; CARVALHO, P. C. F.; NABINGERC, C.; JACQUES, A. V. A.; CARASSAI, I. J.; TENTARDINI, F. Estrategias de manejo da oferta de forragem para recria de novilhas em pastagem natural. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 38, n. 8, p. 1532-1542, 2009.

PARIS, W.; CECATO, U.; SANTOS, G. T.; BARBEIRO, L.; AVANZZO, L. L.; LIMAO, V. Producao e qualidade de massa de forragem nos estratos da cultivar coastcross-1 consorciada com Arachis pintoi com e sem adubacao nitrogenada. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 30, n. 2, p. 135-143, 2008.

PEREIRA FILHO, J. M.; BAKKE, O. A. Producao de forragem de especies herbaceas da Caatinga. In: GARIGLIO, M. A.; SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B.; CESTARO, L. A.; KAGEYAMA, P. Y. (Org.). Uso sustentavel e conservacao dos recursos florestais da Caatinga. Brasilia: Servico Florestal Brasileiro, 2010. p. 145-159.

PEREIRA FILHO, J. M.; VIEIRA, E. L.; KAMALAK, A.; SILVA, A. M. A.; CEZAR, M. F.; BEELEN, P. M. G. Ruminal disappearance of Mimosa tenuilfora hay treated with sodium hidroxide. Archivos de Zootecnia, v. 56, n. 216, p. 959-962, 2007.

PIAZZETTA, H. V. L; MONTEIRO, A. L. G.; RIBEIRO, T. M. D; CARVALHO, P. C. F.; DITTRICH, J. R.; SILVA, C. J. A. Comportamento ingestivo de cordeiros em terminacao a pasto. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 31, n. 3, p. 227-234, 2009.

RIBASKI, J.; MANEZES, E. A. Disponibilidad y calidade Del pasto buffel (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) en un sistema silvopastoril con algarrobo (Prosopis juliflora) en La region semiarida brasilena. Agroforesteria en las Americas, v. 9, p. 33-34, 2002.

SANTOS, G. R. A.; GUIM, A.; SANTOS, M. V. F.; FERREIRA, M. A.; LIRA, M. A.; DUBEUX JUNIOR, J. C. B.; SILVA, M. J. Caracterizacao do pasto de capim buffel diferido e da dieta de bovinos, durante o periodo seco no Sertao de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 34, n. 2, p. 454-463, 2005.

SAS-Statistical Analysis Sistem. STAT 9.1. User's Guide, v. 3. Cary: SAS Institute Publishing, 2004.

TAVARES, A. M. A.; VERAS, A. S. C.; BATISTA, A. M. V.; FERREIRA, M. A.; VIEIRA, E. L.; SILVA, R. F. S. Niveis crescentes de feno em dietas a base de palma forrageira para caprinos em confinamento: comportamento ingestivo. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 27, n. 4, p. 497-504, 2005.

Received on February 19, 2011.

Accepted on June 20, 2011.

Luiza Daiana Araujo da Silva Formiga (1) *, Jose Morais Pereira Filho (2), Aderbal Marcos de Azevedo Silva (2), Nadjanara Souza Oliveira (1), Diogo da Costa Soares (1) and Olaf Andreas Bakke (2)

(1) Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Av.Universitaria, s/n, Jatoba, 58700-970, Patos, Paraiba, Brazil. (2) Departamento de Pos-graduacao em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Patos, Paraiba, Brazil. * Author for correspondence. E-mail:
Table 1. Frequency (%) of herb species in thinned Caatinga
enriched with buffel grass, under sheep or goat grazing, during
five months of a year.

Species                                        Month

                    Jun. 1      Jul. 1     Aug. 1   Sept. 1   Oct. 1

                  S *   G **   S    G    S    G    S    G    S    G


Andropogon        --     5     5    5    --   5    --   10   --   20
Aristida          15     40    50   55   25   55   55   35   40   25
Brachiaria        --     20
Cenchrus          100    95    85   90   85   60   45   60   55   65
Urochloa          --     --    --   20   --   --   --   5    5    10


Arachis pintoi    20     45    5    35
Centrosema sp.    95     80    75   95   45   85   --   --   --   --
Desmodium sp.     25     20
Indigofera anil   45     50    55   40   5    45   10   5    --   --
Mimosa pudica     10     10    10   5    5    --   5    --   --   --
Rhychosia         100   100    90   95   20   35   15   20   10   5
Stylosanthes      60     65    30   45
Tibouchina        20     5     20   --   10   10   5    --   5    --
Amaranthus        85     65    65   25   --   30   --   --   --   --
Hyptis            90     65    95   90   65   75   55   55   75   70
Ipomoea sp.       45     70    70   80   --   --   35   30   20   10
coromandelianum   20     40    30   45   10   45   10   35   --   5
Merremia           5     --    20   5    40   50   --   --   --   --
Turnera           10     5     5    20   15   25   --   5    5    15

* S- sheep; ** G- Goat.

Table 2. Dry mater availability, accumulation rate and supply of
buffel grass, dicotyledons and other grasses in sheep or goat-
grazed areas.

Variable            Sheep-grazed   Goat-grazed   CV (%)
                        area          area

Forage availability (kg DM [ha.sup.-1])

Buffel grass          1295.6 A       495.5 B      49.6
Other grasses         129.3 A        148.3 A      72.6
Total                 2461.1 A      1984.5 B      20.4
Buffel grass (%)       45.5 A        28.5 B       33.4
Dicotyledons (%)       47.4 B        59.4 A       22.7
Other grasses (%)      7.1 B         12.0 A       76.4

Accumulation rate (kg DM [ha.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1])

Buffel grass           5.0 A          4.5 A       98.1
Dicotyledons           11.2 A        18.6 A       61.3
Other grasses          2.1 B          4.4 A       54.9
Total                  18.3 A        27.6 A       40.4
Buffel grass (%)       34.8 A        16.5 A       93.7
Dicotyledons (%)       54.1 A        65.5 A       47.9
Other grasses (%)      11.1 A        18.0 A       54.6

Forage supply (kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1])

Buffel grass           32.9 A        13.3 B       30.1
Dicotyledons           31.7 B        48.2 A       24.3
Other grasses          4.7 A          7.0 A       49.1
Total                  69.3 A        68.4 A       19.8

Means followed by different letters in the same row differ
significantly (p < 0.10) by Student's t test.

Table 3. Availability of forage from dicotyledons in thinned
Caatinga enriched with buffel grass, in sheep--or goat-grazed
areas, estimated in four months of the year.

Species                       Months

           Jul. 1      Aug. 1     Sept. 1     Oct. 1

Sheep     2079.0 Ba   888.5 Bb    539.8 Ac   637.4 Abc
Goat      2652.6 Aa   1794.3 Ab   579.3 Ac   336.6 Bc

Means followed by different uppercase letters in the same column are
different (p < 0.10) by Student's t test. Means followed by different
lowercase letters in the same line are different (p < 0.10) by
Student's t test.

Table 4. Buffel grass, dicotyledons and other grasses dry matter
(DM) availability, accumulation rate and supply, in a thinned
Caatinga enriched with buffel grass grazed by sheep and goats,
from June to October.

Variable                               Month

                      Jul. 1     Aug. 1     Sept. 1     Oct. 1

Forage availability (kg DM [ha.sup.-1])

Buffel grass         956.8 A    851.6 A    1091.3 A    682.5 A
Dicotyledons [phi]    2366.0     1341.3      559.6      486.9
Other grasses         74.8 B    128.2 AB   108.5 AB    243.6 A
Total                3397.6 A   2321.1 B   1759.4 BC   1413.0 C
Buffel grass (%)      22.7 C    31.7 BC     52.8 A     40.9 AB
Dicotyledons (%)      74.8 A     62.6 A     40.3 B      36.2 B
Other Grasses (%)     2.6 B      5.7 B       6.8 B      23.0 A

Accumulation rate (kg DM [ha.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1])

Buffel grass          3.7 A      6.5 A       4.8 A      3.9 A
Dicotyledons         15.6 AB    11.5 AB     23.4 A      9.1 B
Other grasses         2.1 B      1.4 B      3.8 AB      5.9 A
Total                21.4 AB    19.4 AB     32.0 A      18.9 B
Buffel grass (%)      36.6 A     39.8 A     13.1 A      23.1 A
Dicotyledons (%)      64.7 A     52.4 A     75.7 A      46.5 A
Other grasses (%)     8.7 B      7.8 B      11.2 B      30.4 A

Forage supply (kg DM 100 [kg.sup.-1] LW [day.sup.-1])

Buffel grass          19.9 A     23.3 A     24.2 A      25.0 A
Dicotyledons          66.1 A     43.6 B     33.6 B      16.5 C
Other grasses         8.3 A      2.8 B      4.8 AB      7.5 A
Total                 94.2 A     69.7 B     62.6 BC     49.0 C

Means followed by a different uppercase letter in the same row differ
by Student's t test (p < 0.10). [phi] = indicates grazing x date
interaction effect, referred to in Table 2.
COPYRIGHT 2012 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Formiga, Luiza Daiana Araujo da Silva; Filho, Jose Morais Pereira; Silva, Aderbal Marcos de Azevedo;
Publication:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (UEM)
Date:Apr 1, 2012
Previous Article:Alternative milking time and feeding behavior of crossbred dairy cows in grazing production systems/Horario alternativo de ordenha e o comportamento...
Next Article:Protein and metabolizable energy on a meat quail line/Niveis de proteina bruta e energia metabolizavel em uma linhagem de codorna de corte.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |