Printer Friendly

Fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter absent from isolates, Australia.

Fluoroquinolone resistance was detected in 12 of 370 Australian human Campylobacter isolates; 10 of these were travel-associated, and for 2 isolates travel status was unknown. No resistance was found in isolates known to be locally acquired. In Australia, fluoroquinolones have not been licensed for use in food production animals, a policy that may have relevance for countries with fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter.


In Australia, Campylobacter is the most commonly reported bacterial foodborne pathogen with an annual incidence of 125/100,000 population (1). Fluoroquinolone resistance in this pathogen is recognized as an emerging public health problem related to the use of these antimicrobial agents in food production animals. Data from many regions (United States, Europe, and Thailand) that have licensed fluoroquinolones for therapeutic use in animals have shown that such use results in the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli isolates

obtained from both humans and animals (2-4). Increasing resistance in campylobacter may lead to infections that are unresponsive to antimicrobial drug treatment and more severe disease. Smith (2) demonstrated that resistant C. jejuni caused more prolonged diarrhea in patients than susceptible strains.

Fluoroquinolone resistance may emerge during treatment in humans (3); however, Smith (2)and others (5) demonstrated that most detected resistant isolates come from patients who have not been exposed to fluoroquinolones. Furthermore, as human-to-human transmission of campylobacter is rare, patients infected with resistant campylobacter are not an important source of resistance for other humans (4).

In Australia, fluoroquinolones have never been licensed for use in food production animals. A small amount is used in companion animals: imports of enrofloxacin began in 1995, and 49 kg was used in the financial year 1996-97 (6). In contrast, the average use of quinolones in humans was 3,200 kg per year from 1992 to 1997 (6).

Australian data on fluoroquinolone resistance in human Campylobacter isolates are limited. As part of a case-control study of risk factors for Campylobacter infection conducted in New South Wales from 1999 to 2001, patients infected with this pathogen were recruited, and information on various exposures was obtained by telephone interview. Patients were asked about local and international travel in the 4 weeks before onset of diarrhea. Isolates from patients were stored and subsequently tested for resistance to 10 antimicrobial agents by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method for Helicobacter species (7). The Table shows proportions of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates from this case-control study. In addition, results of two laboratory-based surveys of antimicrobial resistance, one conducted on isolates from Western Australia and one conducted on isolates from the Australian Capital Territory, are included. In these last two studies, information on overseas travel was sought retrospectively. Fluoroquinolone-resistant human Campylobacter isolates were rarely detected in Australia. All ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates detected in the three regions were from patients who appeared to have acquired their infection outside the country (Table). Two locally acquired isolates in the New South Wales study were resistant to nalidixic acid only (i.e., they were sensitive to fluoroquinolones).

As Campylobacter infection is zoonotic, the absence of human, locally acquired infections attributable to fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms most likely reflects l) the lack of use of fluoroquinolones in Australian poultry (the most common source for C. jejuni) and other potential meat sources and 2) the presence of little or no viable Campylobacter organisms on imported chicken, which has been a source of resistant campylobacter infections in the United Kingdom (5). Only cooked chicken products can be imported into Australia.

Fluoroquinolones are critical therapeutic agents for many serious bacterial infections because, in many cases, they may be the only active oral agents available. Resistance following fluoroquinolone use can develop in many gram-negative bacteria (campylobacter, salmonellae, and Escherichia coli) carried by animals. These bacteria can be present in food. If they subsequently cause infections in humans (or transfer their resistance genes to other bacteria), no effective antimicrobial agents may be available for treatment when serious disease occurs. Thus, their use in animals should be avoided. Australia has never licensed the use of fluoroquinolone agents in livestock. In contrast with other nations that have licensed their use, fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter isolates and subsequent infections in humans acquired from meats eaten within the country have not emerged in Australia. The Australian experience has implications for the continued licensing of these agents in other countries for food production animals.
Table. Fluoroquinolone resistance data for Australian Campylobacter

 Isolate source and Total no.
Study location collection period tested

New South Wales Human feces 180 (b)
Western Australia Human feces 50 (b)
Australian Capital Human feces/blood 140 (d)
 Territory 2001-2002

 Proportion (a) of fluoroquinolone-resistant
 isolates (%)

 Locally Overseas acquisition
Study location acquired acquired status

New South Wales 0/144 (0) 3 (c)/7 (43) 2 (c)/29 (6.9)

Western Australia 4 (c) 0/46 (0)

Australian Capital 3 0/137 (0)

(a) No. of resistant isolates by acquisition status/total no. isolates
tested in acquisition status category.

(b) Testing by agar dilution, Mueller-Hinton agar with 5% lysed sheep
blood (7).

(c) Resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC [greater than or equal to] 4 mg/L).

(d) Testing by disc-susceptibility method (8).

Antimicrobial testing of isolates from the New South Wales case-control study was funded by OzFoodNet, enhanced surveillance program of the Department of Health and Ageing, Australia.

Ms. Unicomb is an epidemiologist with OzFoodNet, the Australian enhanced foodborne disease surveillance program with particular involvement in studies of the risk factors for campylobacter infection and subtyping methods for that organism.


(1.) Blumer C, Roche P, Spencer J, Lin M, Milton A, Bunn C, et al. Annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Commun Dis Intell 2003;27:1-78.

(2.) Smith KE, Besser KM, Hedberg CW, Leano FT, Bender JB, Wicklund JH, et al. Quinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni infections in Minnesota, 1992 1998. N Engl J Med 1999:340:1525 32.

(3.) Wegener HC. The consequences for food safety of the use of fluoroquinolones in food animals. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1581-2.

(4.) Engberg J, Aarestrup FM, Taylor DE, Gamer-Smidt P, Nachamkin I. Quinolone and macrolide resistance hi Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:24-34.

(5.) Gaunt PN, Piddock LJ. Ciprofloxacin resistant Campylobacter spp. in humans: an epidemiological and laboratory study. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996;37:747-57.

(6.) Commonwealth of Australia. The use of antibiotics in food-producing animals: antibiotic resistant bacteria in animals and humans. Report of the .Joint Expert Advisory Committee on Antibiotic Resistance (JETACAR). 1999 [accessed 2003 Feb]. Available from: URL:

(7.) Sharma H, Unicomb L, Forbes W, Djordjevic S, Valcanis M, Dalton C, et al. Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from humans in the Hunter Region, New South Wales. Commun Dis Intell 2003;27(Suppl):S80-8.

(8.) Huysman MB, Turnidge JD. Disc susceptibility testing for thermophilic Campylobacters. Pathology 1997;29:209 16.

Address for correspondence: L. Unicomb, OzFoodNet, Hunter Public Health Unit, Locked Mail Bag 119, Wallsend NSW 2287, Australia; fax: 61-2-49246490; email:

Leanne Unicomb, * John Ferguson, [dagger] Thomas V Riley, [double dagger] and Peter Collignon [section]

OzFoodNet, Newcastle, Australia [dagger] University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia [double dagger] Western Australian Centre for Pathology & Medical Research, Perth, Australia [section] The Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australia
COPYRIGHT 2003 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Dispatches
Author:Collignon, Peter
Publication:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Geographic Code:8AUST
Date:Nov 1, 2003
Previous Article:Fluoroquinolone susceptibility of Campylobacter strains, Senegal.
Next Article:Cutaneous melioidosis and necrotizing fasciitis caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Related Articles
Quinolone and Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: Resistance Mechanisms and Trends in Human Isolates.
Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, Pennsylvania, USA, 1982-2001. (Dispatches).
Maintaining fluoroquinolone class efficacy: review of influencing factors. (Perspectives).
Fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolates in travelers returning to Finland: association of ciprofloxacin resistance to travel...
Fluoroquinolones and the risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized patients. (1).
Fluoroquinolone resistance linked to GyrA, GyrB, and ParC mutations in Salmonella enterica Typhimurium isolates in humans.
Fluoroquinolone susceptibility of Campylobacter strains, Senegal.
Relative fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli carriage in long-term care facility.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, staphylococcus aureus, and fluoroquinolone use.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters