Flocked swabs beat aspiration for virus recovery.
SAN DIEGO -- Nasopharyngeal flocked swabs are significantly more effective than nasopharyngeal aspirates for recovery of respiratory viruses, according to a nostril-to-nostril comparative study.
The cost of the flocked swab method was 58% less in terms of equipment and procedural time than for nasopharyngeal aspiration in this 106-patient study, Dr. Gaurav Sangwan reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.
Moreover, the nasopharyngeal flocked swabs were significantly more environmentally friendly, with a carbon footprint less than 5% of that involved in obtaining nasopharyngeal aspirates. Health care personnel participating in the study indicated they found the flocked swabs easier to use and preferable to obtaining nasopha-ryngeal aspirates, added Dr. Sangwan of Southern Illinois University, Springfield.
Each of the 106 study participants with suspected viral respiratory infection underwent flocked swabbing of one nostril and nasopharyngeal aspiration in the other. Swabbing yielded 67 positive results, significantly more than the 60 positives with nasopharyngeal aspiration. Respiratory syncytial virus was detected by immunoassay in 25 specimens obtained by flocked swabbing and in 21 nasopharyngeal aspirates. The average estimated yield of epithelial cells rated by laboratory personnel on a 1-4 scale was a score of 3.6 per flocked swab and 3.0 per nasal aspirate.
Disclosures: Dr. Sangwan's study was funded in part by research grants from Copan Diagnostics, the developers of flocked swabs, and Diagnostic Hybrids.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||INFECTIOUS DISEASES|
|Publication:||Internal Medicine News|
|Article Type:||Brief article|
|Date:||Feb 15, 2010|
|Previous Article:||NSAIDs and symptoms of the common cold.|
|Next Article:||Acyclovir ineffective in serodiscordant couples.|