Flexible sigmoidoscopy cut colorectal cancer incidence.
In addition, results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial showed that study participants in the flexible sigmoidoscopy group had a 26% reduction m overall colorectal cancer mortality and a 50% reduction in mortality related to distal colorectal cancer, compared with the usual-care group.
In about 22% of cases, colonoscopy was performed as a direct effect of screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Dr. Robert E. Schoen of the division of gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and his associates randomly assigned 154,900 men and women aged 55-74 years to either screening with a baseline flexible sigmoidoscopy, with a repeat screening every 3 or 5 years, or to usual care, which was defined as "whatever might have been recommended by the patient's physician," he said.
The rate of routine colonoscopy after the screening phase was 47.7% in the intervention group and 48.0% in the usual-care group, according to the study.
The investigators followed the study participants for a median of 11.9 years and collected medical records related to follow-up, a diagnosis of cancer, and cancer complications. The primary outcome was death from colorectal cancer, while incidence of the disease was listed as a secondary outcome (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012 May 21 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1114635]).
Of the 154,900 study participants, 77,445 were assigned to the flexible sigmoidoscopy group and 77,455 to the usual-care group. The groups were evenly split by gender, more than half (64%) ranged in age from 55 to 64 years, 86% were white (non-Hispanic), and 34% were college graduates.
During follow-up, the incidence of colorectal cancer was 11.9 cases/10,000 person-years in the intervention group, compared with 15.2 cases / 10,000 person-years in the usual-care group, which translated into a statistically significant reduction of 21% (P less than .001).
The researchers also reported that there were 2.9 deaths from colorectal cancer/10,000 person-years in the intervention group, compared with 3.9/10,000 person-years in the usual-care
Mortality from distal disease was reduced by 50% in the intervention group, compared with the usual-care group (P less than .001), but mortality from proximal disease remained unaffected (P =. 81).
"As compared with the distal colon, the proximal colon poses a more difficult challenge for colorectal cancer control because of limitations in bowel preparation, a greater prevalence of advanced serrated adenomas, which are harder to detect than conventional adenomas, and biologic differences, including a greater incidence of BRAF mutation, micro-satellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)," the study's researchers explained.
'Although our protocol was associated with a reduction in the incidence of proximal colorectal cancer, presumably because of the detection and removal of precursor adenomas that would otherwise have progressed to cancer, it apparently did not succeed in identifying and successfully removing a proportionally greater number of precursor lesions destined to develop into fatal colorectal cancers," the study's authors added.
At the meeting, Dr. Schoen said that clinicians "have to become better at detecting subtle polyps in the right [proximal] colon. The hope is that if we get better with colonoscopy we will be able to find not just the polyps that lead to cancer, but also the polyps that lead to fatal cancer."
Major Finding: The use of flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, as compared with usual care, was associated with a 26% reduction in overall colorectal cancer mortality and a 21% reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer.
Data Source: Findings are based on a study of 77,445 participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.
Disclosures: Dr. Schoen disclosed that he has received stock options from Onconome. The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute. group, which translated into a statistically significant reduction of 26% (P less than .001).
* To see a video interview with Dr. Robert E. Schoen about the clinical implications of the study, scan this QR code with a smartphone, or visit www.familypraticenews.com.
FROM THE ANNUAL DIGESTIVE DISEASE WEEK
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Family Practice News|
|Date:||Jun 1, 2012|
|Previous Article:||CDC proposes one-time hep C test for baby boomers.|
|Next Article:||U.S. Task Force: counsel youth on sun exposure.|