Printer Friendly

Fitch: Basel Reduces Sovereign Role in Bank Capital Calculations.

London: Debt issued by banks in certain jurisdictions could become less attractive to other banks under new Basel rules, Fitch Ratings says in a new report. Exposure to banks through debt holdings and counterparty transactions will attract regulatory capital charges that no longer give benefit for potential sovereign support, pushing up capital requirements.

From January 2022, regulatory capital requirements calculated by banks using their own models will be subject to floors based on the Basel standardised approach. For debt and counterparty exposures to financial institutions, this means banks will have to hold capital based on credit ratings, excluding any uplift for sovereign support. Uplift is worth several notches in some jurisdictions, notably China and parts of the Middle East.

We factor sovereign support into many banks' ratings in parts of the Middle East and Asia, where we believe the national authorities are very likely to provide support to banks in need. The impact is most significant for Kuwait, the UAE, China and Qatar, where the sovereign ratings are significantly higher than most banks' Viability Ratings. (A bank's Viability Rating reflects its intrinsic creditworthiness excluding any potential sovereign support.)

Risk weights on some bank exposures will more than double when the benefit of sovereign uplift is excluded from the calculations. The impact varies significantly, particularly for debt tenors of three months or longer, and is heavily influenced not only by the amount of uplift removed but also by the resulting rating level, with several "cliff edge" effects. For example, removing one notch from an 'A-' rating would entail a shift into a new Basel risk-weighting bucket, increasing the risk weight from 30% to 50%. In contrast, removing five notches from a 'BB+' rating would have no capital impact, as the "before" and "after" positions at these lower rating levels both attract a 100% risk weight.

The higher capital charges are currently unlikely to have major implications in practice. In the jurisdictions where significant sovereign uplift in bank ratings is prevalent, banks tend not to issue much debt as they are mainly deposit funded. Their reliance on bank counterparties is largely limited to foreign banks providing support for their offshore expansion and limited trading portfolios. Non-bank lenders could partly fill any gap resulting from higher charges as they are not subject to Basel rules. Nevertheless, the higher charges may constrain future expansion of banks' use of debt financing or push up the pricing of counterparty credit risk.

COPYRIGHT 2018 Plus Media Solutions
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily the Pak Banker (Lahore, Pakistan)
Date:Jul 28, 2018
Words:405
Previous Article:Fitch Affirms Thailand's TOP at 'AA-(tha)'; Outlook Stable.
Next Article:Fitch Affirms Heber Light and Power, UT's Electric Revs at 'A+'; Outlook Stable.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters