First data on the seasonal diet of the vulnerable Gazella cuvieri (Mammalia: Bovidae) in the Djebel Messaad forest, northern Algeria.
Food availability is one of the most important factors influencing the distribution of free-ranging ungulates (Fitzgerald & Waddington 1979, Holecheck et al. 1982, Gill et al. 1983). Some studies have based the classification of ungulate feeding types on the botanical compositions of the diet (Gordon & Illius 1994, 1996) along a continuum from frugivores to browsers and grazers (Hofmann & Stewart 1972, McNaughton & Georgiadis 1986, Hofmann 1989, Bodner 1990, Gagnon & Chew 2000). Dietary preferences of herbivores can vary, with some species specializing on either grass (grazers), woody vegetation (browsers), or a combination of these two food types (intermediate feeders) (Grzimek 1990). Understanding the basis to diet selection by mammalian herbivores is complex (Shipley 1999). Some fundamental differences exist between grass (monocotyledons) and browse (herbaceous and woody dicotyledons, such as forbs, shrub leaves and stems; Hofmann & Stewart 1972). Knowing the extent to which herbivores feed as grazers (diets containing [less than or equal to] 25 % browse) or browsers (diets i.e. containing [greater than or equal to] 75 % fruits, dicot foliage, tree and shrub stems and foliage) is essential for the appropriate management and conservation of their populations (Hofmann & Stewart 1972).
African bovids are a diverse group of mammals that occur from tropical rainforests to deserts (Gagnon & Chew 2000). Woodland, maquis shrubland and steppe are their main natural habitats in the north-western part of the continent. Studies carried out across a range of environments have documented the proportion of grass and browse consumed by Dorcas gazelle Gazella dorcas (Loggers 1991, Abdelhamid 1998, Cuzin 1998, Salem & Saleh 1998, Ait Baamrane et al. 2012, 2017). For Cuvier's gazelle Gazella cuvieri, Arbouche et al. (2012) reported direct observation of feeding ecology from the Djebel Metlili in the Belezma National Park in Algeria. The diet of this gazelle has also been characterised in unpublished graduate dissertations (Bouredjli 1989, Talbi 1989, Benamor 2014) and as part of an unpublished thesis (Sellami 1999), mainly in the Mergueb nature reserve (M'Sila, Algeria). However, Bounaceur et al. (2016) pointed out that a more comprehensive investigation of the diet of the Cuvier's gazelle is urgently needed to identify critical habitats and suggest necessary conservation.
Cuvier's gazelle is endemic to northwest Africa (Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia) and classified as "Vulnerable" by IUCN (IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2016) due to ongoing habitat degradation, mainly related to the loss of forest to cultivation and pasture. Widely distributed in Algeria until the 19th century, the species experienced a dramatic range decrease during the last century (Bounaceur et al. 2016). It has recently disappeared from a few localities and the remaining populations are highly fragmented, except possibly in the large national forests of native Aleppo pines, Pinus halepensis (Beudels et al. 2013). As such, conservation of this declining species, nationally listed as "Endangered" (Bounaceur et al. 2016), should be a priority.
As part of an extensive survey of Cuvier's gazelle in the Djebel Messaad forest, where a small population of ca. 20 individuals persists, we investigated the seasonal diet composition over one year. This study is intended to show local optimal habitats for the species and support sympathetic management of vegetation.
Material and Methods
Field work was conducted in Djebel Messaad (34[degrees]59'53.1'' N, 4[degrees]17'07.2'' E), M'Sila Province, northern Algeria, a mountainous area located 30 km south-east of Bou Saada (Fig. 1). The highest summit, Teniet Sidi Nasseur, is 1675 m a.s.l. The local climate is of a semi-arid Mediterranean type: winters (Dec-Jan-Feb) are cool and humid, summers (Jun-Jul-Aug) are hot and dry. Over the last 10 years temperatures averaged 2.8 [degrees]C (SD = 1.3) in January with an absolute minimum of 0.9 [degrees]C, and 25.9 [degrees]C (SD = 0.9) in July with an absolute maximum of 31.9 [degrees]C. Annual rainfall averaged 435 (SD = 137.8) mm with two peaks: September (65.1 mm) and April (80.4 mm), and a drought period from June to September (Kaabeche 1990).
Djebel Messaad is a natural Aleppo pine, Pinetum halepensis, forest with vegetation including Pistacia lentiscus, Rosmarinus officinalis, Globularia alypum, Hertia cheirifolia, Dorycnium suffruticosum, Fumana ericoides, Stipa tenacissima, Cistus libanotis. Part of the forest belongs also to the association Juniperetum phoenicea characterised by Artemisia herba alba, Lygeum spartum, Helianthemum cinereum, and Quercus ilicis in relatively cool regions or sites less impacted by farming and grazing, and including Cistus villosus, Jasminum fruticans, Muscari atlanticum, Dactylis hispanica and Ampelodesma mauritanica (El-Attoui 1996).
Faecal sampling, epidermis references, and faecal analysis
Faecal pellets of Cuvier's gazelle were collected from September 2013 to August 2014 during the last week of each month in the whole Djebel Messaad Mountain. We studied food composition during autumn (Sep-Oct-Nov) 2013, winter (Dec-Jan-Feb) 2013-2014, spring (Mar-Apr-May) and summer (Jun-Jul-Aug) 2014. Following the protocol of Stewart & Stewart (1971), who studied ten faecal pellets per area and season, we randomly collected three to four fresh pellets per month, recognizable by their colour and shiny appearance, each month in different latrine sites in order to investigate different individuals. Pellets were air-dried and stored in paper bags in the field.
Based on the work of Garcia-Gonzalez (1983), we prepared a reference collection of the epidermis of the main 52 plant species (16 families) collected within the habitat of the gazelle. The method used to obtain the epidermis of the plant fragment involved carefully scraping it with a scalpel to separate tissues above the epidermis from different parts of the plant (adaxial and abaxial surfaces of leaves, stems, flowers). After rinsing in sodium hypochlorite solution (12 %), the epidermis was washed in distilled water, placed in a glycerine solution (50 %) and sealed on a slide with nail varnish (Garcia-Gonzalez 1983). The diagnostic features of the plant epidermis, such as cells, fibres, trichomes, pores, stomata, vessels, intercellular structures and cell walls from each reference slide were photographed using a camera (Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-W380) fitted to an optical microscope at (10 x 0) and (10 x 40) magnification. Following Chapuis (1980) we identified the first 300 epidermal fragments by comparison with reference slides.
Results of diet analysis are expressed as average relative numerical abundance (N%) for each plant taxon. Relative abundance is the ratio of the number of fragments of a species or category ([n.sub.i]) to the total number of fragments of all plant taxa (Zaime & Gautier 1989). The seasonal values of trophic diversity were calculated using the Shannon-Wiener formula. We investigated seasonal variation in diet by computing a factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) of the number of fragments for each plant taxon followed by a hierarchical classification on factorial co-ordinates using PAST 1.37 (Hammer et al. 2001).
Over the year, Cuvier's gazelle fed on 29 plant species from 16 families (Table 1). About 50.5 % of the diet was made up of four plant species: the grasses Stipa tenacissima (17.4 %) and S. parviflora (9 %), the woody Artemisia herba alba (15.2 %), and the forb Helianthemum sp. (8.9 %). The remaining plants included Thymus algeriensis (6.5 %), Cistus libanotis (6 %), Helianthemum lippii (5 %), Phillyrea media (3.2 %), Pistacia terebinthus (3 %), and 20 other species with less than 3 % of each (for a total of 25.8 %).
Shrubs and trees, including A. herba alba, were the dominant plant category (50.5 %), followed by grasses (29.4 %), including S. tenacissima, and forbs (20.1 %) (Table 1). Gazelles fed on forbs mainly during winter (20 %) in contrast to summer (7 %) when the consumption of shrubs and trees was greatest (53.3 %).
The highest species richness of plants in the diet was recorded in spring (17 species, 10 families) despite high consumption of H. lippii (20 %), while the lowest was in summer (nine species, six families), including the relevant consumption of P. media (12.7 %) and Calicotome spinosa (6 %), winter (15 species, ten families) and autumn (12 species, nine families) were intermediate. We demonstrated a relatively higher Shannon diversity index in spring (3.71) in comparison with winter (3.44) and autumn (3.49), with the lowest in summer (0.99).
Factorial correspondence analysis clearly showed seasonal variation in diet (Fig. 2). The spring diet was the most distinct, with the autumn diet intermediate between winter and summer. Seven species characterised the spring diet on the first axis: H. lippii, Heliotropium supinum, Fumana thymifolia, Rosmarinus officinalis, Eruca vesicaria, Bromus rubens and Cynodon dactylon. Summer and winter diets were the opposite on the second axis, with P. media and C. spinosa in summer, eight species including Pituranthos scoparius, Sedum sediforme, Anacyclus cyrtolepidioides and Plantago albicans in winter. The autumn diet was associated with species consumed throughout the year, such as A. herba alba and S. tenacissima with the unique occurrence of P. terebinthus.
With 29 plant species consumed by Cuvier's gazelle in the Djebel Messaad, the species richness of the diet was intermediate between estimates obtained for the Mergueb Nature Reserve (Sellami 1999) and Djebel El Achch (Talbi 1989) (Table 2). However, the former study used faecal analysis as we did, while the latter used direct observation of grazed species, a method which tends to underestimate food diversity (Bouredjli 1989). The microhistological method also underestimates digestible plant species (Brand 1978) or species rarely included in the diet, while overestimating plant species that readily break up into small fragments (Johnson et al. 1983). Our preliminary work, based on 300 fragments, gave a clear picture of the diet of Cuvier's gazelle and its seasonal changes. Nevertheless, accumulation curves should be used to ascertain this sampling design in further studies.
Browse was highly predominant in the diet throughout the year, a result that is congruent with Ait Baamrane et al. (2012, 2017) for the Dorcas gazelle in M'Sabih Talaa Reserve (Morocco). With a diet that included 50.5 % shrubs, 29.4 % grasses and 20.1 % forbs our results corroborate those obtained by Arbouche et al. (2012) by direct observation at Djebel Metlili in the Belezma National Park. From faecal analysis, shrubs accounted for 77.3 % and 36.1 % of the diet in Djebel El Achch (Talbi 1989) and the Mergueb Nature Reserve (Sellami 1999), respectively.
According to Hofmann & Stewart (1972), a diet containing more than 25 % browse and less than 75 % fruits, dicotyledon foliage, and shoots, G. cuvieri can be classed as an "intermediate or mixed feeder". Among the six dietary categories identified by Gagnon & Chew (2000) for African bovids, Cuvier's gazelle falls again into the "browser-grazer" or "mixed feeder" whose diet includes 30-70 % of dicots and monocots and less than 20 % fruits.
Steppe species, such as S. tenacissima (17.4 %) and A. h. alba (15.2 %), were the main food species of G. cuvieri in the Djebel Messaad. This finding is in agreement with the data of Bouredjli (1989) and Bel Hadj Kacem et al. (1994) in Tunisia. However, Talbi (1989) and Arbouche et al. (2012) mentioned only the first of these species, and Sellami (1999) the second, possibly in accordance with their availability at the different sites.
In spring, Cuvier's gazelles consumed the greatest diversity of plant species, including a large amount of shrubs (54.7 %, mainly Helianthemum lippii, followed by Fumana thymifolia) and forbs (23.3 % including mainly Helianthemum sp. and Heliotropium supinum). Grasses (22 %) were also more diversified with four species, including Cynodon dactylon and Bromus rubens, typical of this season. Spring is an important season for gazelles with moulting, parturition and lactation (Olmedo et al. 1985). To meet their elevated energy requirements, growing plant tissue derived from browse are favoured since these are the most nutritious form of food due to their highly soluble cell content (van Soest 1982).
In summer, the number of plant species in the gazelle's diet decreased, together with the amount of forbs (7 %), the availability of which is dramatically reduced under the effects of heat, drought and overgrazing by domestic animals. Westoby (1974) and Belovsky (1978) suggested that herbivores would specialise when resource levels were high and generalise when they were low. In contrast, during this dry season, G. cuvieri restricted its diet to few species of shrubs, including A. h. alba, Phillyrea media, Thymus algeriensis and Calicotome spinosa, and grasses, mainly S. parviflora and S. tenacissima. The seasonal contribution of grasses (39.7 %) does not support the more extensive consumption of dicots during the dry season, when monocots show reduced protein and increased fibre content (Stelfox & Hudson 1986). This high grass contribution to the diet is likely due to the shortage of forbs, which is not counterbalanced by a switch to browse when good quality grass runs out (see Kleynhans et al. 2011).
In autumn, plant diversity in the diet increased together with the amount of forbs, whereas the consumption of S. tenacissima and A. herba alba, the two main food species for G. cuvieri at Djebel Messaad, reached a maximum. Pistacia terebinthus, and Quercus ilex which offer both deciduous leaves and fruits during this season, were also heavily browsed by gazelles, together with 8000 to 10000 sheep and goats, which are in the area throughout the year. The large amount of grasses (33.0 %), mainly S. tenacissima, is probably linked to the same food limitation that is seen in the dry summer due to limited rainfall until November.
During the winter and wet season, the gazelle's diet included a large diversity of plant species, and the largest amount of forbs (34 %) with some species consumed only during this season: Pituranthos scoparius, Sedum sediforme, Anacyclus cyrtolepidioides and Plantago albicans. In contrast to more northern or mountainous areas, the growth of vegetation in the study area is stimulated by rainfall (Zedam et al. 2016). The diet in this season is also characterised by lower quantities of shrubs (43.3 %), with less species consumed compared to other seasons when shrubs, such as Cistus libanotis and Artemisia campestris, are more palatable.
These annual variations highlight the seasonal plasticity of the diet of G. cuvieri beyond the regional variations reported so far (Bouredjli 1989, Talbi 1989, Bel Hadj Kacem et al. 1994, Sellami 1999, Arbouche et al. 2012). Such variation reflects the availability of palatable green plant material and has similarly been reported in mountain gazelle Gazella gazella in lower Galilee (Baharav 1981) or in the Dorcas gazelle in the Negev Desert (Ward & Saltz 1994) and central plains of Morocco (Loggers 1991, Ait Baamrane et al. 2012, 2017).
Based on its diet in the Djebel Messaad G. cuvieri should be classified as an intermediate browser-grazer. Two plant species, the grass S. tenacissima and the shrub A. h. alba, were important food sources throughout the year, but were supplemented by a variety of species that contributed to the seasonal variation in the diet. From a conservation perspective, it would be useful to safeguard the availability of these and other key food resources, particularly in summer when vegetation is rarer and competition with livestock is magnified. With respect to predicted climate change scenarios, which suggest increasing probability of heatwaves and droughts in summer, the Cuvier's gazelle may be able to adapt its diet as long as a sufficient quantity of food is available, even if restricted to dry grasses such as Stipa parviflora. Interactions with other wild species, such as wild boar Sus scrofa, as well as domestic herbivores (primarily sheep and goats), should be investigated to better inform the conservation and management of this vulnerable gazelle species.
Abdelhamid K. 1998: Statuts des antilopes sahariennes de Tunisie. In: Smith T. (ed.), Compte rendu du Seminaire sur la conservation et la restauration des Antilopes Sahelo-Sahariennes. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Convention on migratory species, Technical Series publ. no. 3, Djerba, Tunisia: 96-104.
Ait Baamrane M.A., Shehzad W., Ouhammou A. et al. 2012: Assessment of the food habits of the Moroccan dorcas gazelle in M'Sabih Talaa, West Central Morocco, using the trnL approach. PLOS ONE 7: e35643.
Ait Baamrane M.A., Znari M. & Bellout S. 2017: Evaluation du regime alimentaire de la gazelle dorcas du Maroc Gazella dorcas massaesyla dans la reserve M'Sabih Talaa par analyse microhistologique. Go-South Bull. 14: 125-132.
Arbouche Y., Arbouche H.S., Arbouche F.A. & Arbouche R. 2012: Valeur fourragere des especes prelevees par Gazella cuvieri Ogilby, 1841 au niveau du Djebel Metlili (Algerie). Arch. Zootec. 61: 145-148.
Baharav D. 1981: Food habits of the mountain gazelle in semi-arid habitats of eastern lower Galilee, Israel. J. Arid Environ. 4: 63-69.
Bel Hadj Kacem S., Muller H.P. & Wiesner H. 1994: Gestion de la faune sauvages et parcs nationaux en Tunisie. Reintroduction, Gestion et amenagement. Direction Generale des Forets et Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit, Tunis.
Belovsky G.E. 1978: Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor. Popul. Biol. 4: 105-134.
Benamor N. 2014: Contribution a l'etude ecologique de la gazelle de Cuvier Gazella cuvieri (Ogilby, 1841) dans l'Est de l'Algerie. Magister thesis, Ecole Normale Superieure de Kouba, Alger, Algeria.
Beudels R.C., Devillers P. & Cuzin F. 2013: Gazella cuvieri Cuvier's gazelle (Atlas gazelle, Edmi gazelle). In: Kingdon J. & Hoffmann M. (eds.), Mammals of Africa, vol. 6. Pigs, hippopotamuses, chevrotain, giraffes, deer and bovids. Bloomsbury Publ., London, U.K.: 349-352.
Bodner R.E. 1990: Ungulate frugivores and the browser-grazer continuum. Oikos 57: 319-325.
Bouredjli H.A. 1989: Elements d'ecoethologie de la gazelle de Cuvier: Gazella cuvieri (Ogilby, 1841) dans la reserve naturelle de Mergueb (M'Sila) et son statut en Algerie. Engineering thesis, Institut National Agronomique, El Harrach, Algeria.
Bounaceur F., Boualem A., Benamor N. et al. 2016: Updated distribution and local abundance of the endangered Cuvier's gazelle (Mammalia, Bovidae) in Algeria. Folia Zool. 65: 233-238.
Brand M.R. 1978: Method to correct for differential digestibility in fecal analysis. Am. Midl. Nat. 100: 228-232.
Chapuis J.L. 1980: Methodes d'etude du regime alimentaire de Lapin de garenne Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) par l'analyse micrographique des feces. Rev. Ecol.-Terre Vie 34: 159-198.
Cuzin F. 1998: Localisation et evaluation des populations residuelles d'Antilopines: le cas du genre Gazella au Maroc. In: Smith T. (ed.), Compte rendu du Seminaire sur la conservation et la restauration des antilopes sahelo-sahariennes. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Convention on migratory species, Technical Series publ. no. 3, Djerba, Tunisia: 171-182.
El-Attoui A. 1996: Etude phytoecologique et cartographie de la vegetation steppique par utilisation de teledetection (Cas, Daira de Djebel Messaad). Engineering thesis, Institut Agronomique, University Setif, Algeria.
Fitzgerald A.E. & Waddington D.C. 1979: Comparison of two methods of faecal analysis of herbivore diet. J. Wildlife Manage. 43: 468-473.
Gagnon M. & Chew A.E. 2000: Dietary preferences in extant African Bovidae. J. Mammal. 81: 490-511.
Garcia-Gonzalez R. 1983: Epidermis foliares de algunas especies de Festuca, Poa y Bellardiochloa en el Pirineo Occidental. An. Jardin Bot. Madrid 39: 389-404.
Gill R.B., Carpenter L.H., Bartmann R.M. et al. 1983: Faecal analysis to estimate mule deer diets. J. Wildlife Manage. 47: 902-915.
Gordon I.J. & Illius A.W. 1994: The functional significance of the browser-grazer dichotomy in African ruminants. Oecologia 98: 167-175.
Gordon I.J. & Illius A.W. 1996: The nutritional ecology of African ruminants: a reinterpretation. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 18-28.
Grzimek B. 1990: Grzimek's encyclopedia of mammals. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A.
Hammer O., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001: PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeont. Electron. 4: 9.
Hofmann R.R. 1989: Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78: 443-457.
Hofmann R.R. & Stewart D.R.M. 1972: Grazers and browsers: a classification based on the stomach structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants. Mammalia 36: 226-240.
Holecheck J.L., Vavra M. & Piper R.D. 1982: Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review. J. Range Manage. 35: 309-315.
IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2016: Gazella cuvieri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T8967A50186003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T8967A50186003.en
Johnson M.K., Wofford H. & Pearson H.A. 1983: Microhistological techniques for food habits analyses. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experimental Station, Research paper SO-1 99, New Orleans LA, U.S.A.
Kaabeche M. 1990: Les groupements vegetaux de la region de Bou Saada (Algerie). Essai de synthese sur la vegetation steppique du Maghreb. Doctoral thesis, University Paris-Sud, Paris, France.
Kleynhans E.J., Jolles A.E., Bos M.R. & Olff H. 2011: Resource partitioning along multiple niche dimensions in differently sized African savanna grazers. Oikos 120: 591-600.
Loggers C.O. 1991: Forage availability versus seasonal diets, as determined by fecal analysis of dorcas gazelles in Morocco. Mammalia 55: 255-268.
McNaughton S.J. & Georgiadis N.J. 1986: Ecology of African grazing and browsing mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. System 17: 39-65.
Olmedo G., Escos J. & Gomendio M. 1985: Reproduction de Gazella cuvieri en captivite. Mammalia 49: 501-507.
Salem M. & Saleh M. 1998: Ecophysiological basis of habitat and food selection in the Dorcas gazelle Gazella dorcas in the Wadi El Raiyan Sand Dune Ecosystem, Egypt. Al-Azhar University Journal of Science 28: 412-424.
Sellami M. 1999: La Gazelle de Cuvier Gazella cuvieri (Ogilby, 1841) en Algerie. Statut et premiers elements d'ecologie, donnees sur le regime alimentaire dans la reserve naturelle de Mergueb (M'Sila). Doctoral Thesis, Institut National Agronomique, Alger, Algeria.
Shipley L.A. 1999: Grazers and browsers: how digestive morphology affects diet selection. In: Launchbaugh K.L., Sanders K.D. & Mosley J.C. (eds.), Grazing behavior of livestock and wildllife. Idaho Forest, University of Idaho, Wildlife and Range Experimental Station, bulletin no. 70, Moscow: 20-27.
Stelfox B. & Hudson R.J. 1986: Body condition of male Thomson's and Grant's gazelles in relation to season and resource use. Afr. J. Ecol. 24: 111-120.
Stewart D.R.M. & Stewart J. 1971: Comparative food preferences of five East African ungulates at different seasons. In: Watt E. & Duffey A.S. (eds.), The scientific management of animal and plant communities for conservation. Blackwell Science Publishing, Oxford: 351-366.
Talbi K. 1989: Etude eco-ethologique de la Gazelle du Cuvier (Gazella cuvieri, Ogilby 1841) dans la zone de Djebel El Achch, Wilaya de Saida. Magister thesis, Institut National Agronomique, Alger, Algeria.
van Soest P.J. 1982: Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A.
Ward D. & Saltz D. 1994: Foraging at different spatial scales: Dorcas gazelles foraging for lilies in the Negev Desert. Ecology 75: 48-58.
Westoby M. 1974: An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. Am. Nat. 108: 290-304.
Zaime A. & Gautier J.Y. 1989: Comparaison des regimes alimentaires de trois especes sympatriques de Gerbillidae en milieu saharien au Maroc. Rev. Ecol.-Terre Vie 44: 263-278.
Zedam A., Mimeche F., Benkherif M. et al. 2016: Diversity and plant distribution according to the topographical factors in Djebel Messaad forest (M'Sila--Algeria). Adv. Environ. Biol. 10: 27-38.
Naceur BENAMOR (1,2*), Farid BOUNACEUR (2,4), Mounia BAHA (1) and Stephane AULAGNIER (3)
(1) Laboratoire d'Ecobiologie Animale, Ecole Normale Superieure de Kouba, Vieux Kouba,16308 Alger, Algeria; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
(2) Equipe Biologie de la Conservation en Zones Arides et Semi-Arides, Laboratoire de Biotechnologie et de Nutrition en Zones Semi-Arides, Faculte des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Campus de Karmane Universite Ibn Khaldoun, 14000 Tiaret, Algeria
(3) Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage, I.N.R.A., Universite de Toulouse, CS 52627, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan cedex, France
(4) Departement des Science de la Nature et de la Vie, Centre Universitaire Ahmed Ben Yahia Al-Wancharissi, 38000 Tissemsilt, Algeria
Received 18 February 2019; Accepted 8 July 2019
(*) Corresponding Author
Table 1. Diet of Gazella cuvieri during autumn 2013, winter 2013-2014, spring and summer 2014 in the Djebel Messaad Mountain, Algeria. (-): Not found in faeces. Others: plant species consumed by Cuvier's gazelle comprising < 3 % of the diet. Shrubs (Globularia alypum, Rosmarinus officinalis, Calligonum comosum); grasses (Bromus rubens); forbs (Eruca vesicaria, Silybum sp.). Plant categories and species Autumn N (%) Winter N (%) Shrubs and trees 50.67 43.33 Artemisia herba alba (Aha) 21.33 14.67 Thymus algeriensis (Tal) 6.00 3.33 Cistus libanotis (Cli) 2.67 16.67 Helianthemum lippii (Hli) - - Phillyrea media (Pme) - - Pistacia terebinthus (Pte) 12.00 - Artemisia absinthium (Aab) 2.00 - Pinus halepensis (Pha) - 3.33 Fumana thymifolia (Fth) - - Artemisia campestris (Aca) - 4.00 Calicotome spinosa (Csp) - - Quercus ilex (Qil) 4.00 1.33 Others 2.67 - Grasses 33.33 22.67 Stipa tenacissima (Ste) 26.67 20.00 Stipa parviflora (Spa) 6.67 2.67 Cynodon dactylon (Cda) - - Others - - Forbs 16.00 34.00 Helianthemum sp. (Hsp) 8.67 8.67 Malva parviflora (Mpa) 6.00 4.00 Heliotropium supinum (Hsu) - - Pituranthos scoparius (Psc) - 6.00 Sedum sediforme (Sse) - 5.33 Anacyclus cyrtolepidioides (Acy) - 4.67 Anarrhinum fruticosum (Afr) 0.67 2.00 Plantago albicans (Pal) - 3.33 Others 0.67 - Number of fragments 300 300 Plant categories and species Spring N (%) Summer N (%) Shrubs and trees 54.67 53.33 Artemisia herba alba (Aha) 7.33 17.33 Thymus algeriensis (Tal) 4.67 12.00 Cistus libanotis (Cli) 4.66 - Helianthemum lippii (Hli) 20.00 - Phillyrea media (Pme) - 12.67 Pistacia terebinthus (Pte) - - Artemisia absinthium (Aab) 3.33 5.33 Pinus halepensis (Pha) 4.67 - Fumana thymifolia (Fth) 6.67 - Artemisia campestris (Aca) 2.00 - Calicotome spinosa (Csp) - 6.00 Quercus ilex (Qil) - - Others 1.33 - Grasses 22.00 39.67 Stipa tenacissima (Ste) 6.00 17.00 Stipa parviflora (Spa) 6.67 20.00 Cynodon dactylon (Cda) 6.67 2.67 Others 2.67 - Forbs 23.33 7.00 Helianthemum sp. (Hsp) 11.33 7.00 Malva parviflora (Mpa) - - Heliotropium supinum (Hsu) 9.34 - Pituranthos scoparius (Psc) - - Sedum sediforme (Sse) - - Anacyclus cyrtolepidioides (Acy) - - Anarrhinum fruticosum (Afr) 0.67 - Plantago albicans (Pal) - - Others 2.00 - Number of fragments 300 300 Plant categories and species Annual N (%) Shrubs and trees 50.50 Artemisia herba alba (Aha) 15.16 Thymus algeriensis (Tal) 6.50 Cistus libanotis (Cli) 6.00 Helianthemum lippii (Hli) 5.00 Phillyrea media (Pme) 3.17 Pistacia terebinthus (Pte) 3.00 Artemisia absinthium (Aab) 2.66 Pinus halepensis (Pha) 2.00 Fumana thymifolia (Fth) 1.67 Artemisia campestris (Aca) 1.50 Calicotome spinosa (Csp) 1.50 Quercus ilex (Qil) 1.33 Others 1.00 Grasses 29.42 Stipa tenacissima (Ste) 17.42 Stipa parviflora (Spa) 9.00 Cynodon dactylon (Cda) 2.34 Others 0.67 Forbs 20.08 Helianthemum sp. (Hsp) 8.92 Malva parviflora (Mpa) 2.50 Heliotropium supinum (Hsu) 2.34 Pituranthos scoparius (Psc) 1.50 Sedum sediforme (Sse) 1.33 Anacyclus cyrtolepidioides (Acy) 1.17 Anarrhinum fruticosum (Afr) 0.84 Plantago albicans (Pal) 0.83 Others 0.67 Number of fragments 1200 Table 2. Plants consumed by Gazella cuvieri in different localities of Algeria reported in previous studies and this study (the lists are ordered by decreasing importance). (*) observation of direct browsing, (**) faecal analysis. Djebel El Achch Mergueb Reserve (Saida) Talbi (1989) (*) (M'sila) Bouredjli (1989) (*) Olea europea Artemisia herba alba Arbutus unedo Sonchus asper Pistacia lentiscus Crepis vesicaria Phillyrea angustifolia Stipa tenacissima Quercus coccifera Anabasis articulata Calycotome spinosa Noaea mucronata Lonicera implexa Asphodelus fstolosus Ruta montana Ephedra major Lavandula stoechas Lycium arabium Lycium arabicum Olea europea Jasminum fruticans Phytoranthus chlorontus Cytisus triforus Asparagus albus Rhamnus alaternus Phus tricuspidata Asparagus albidus Helianthemum lippii Salvia pratensis Salsola vermiculata Stipa tenacissima Asphodelus microcarpus Globularia alypum Ferula communis Cytisus arborium Rosmarinus sp. Teucrium sp. Djebel El Achch Mergueb Reserve (Saida) Talbi (1989) (*) (M'sila) Sellami (1999) (**) Olea europea Salsola vermiculata Arbutus unedo Helianthemum lippii Pistacia lentiscus Cynodon dactylon Phillyrea angustifolia Gastridium scabrum Quercus coccifera Herniaria mauritanica Calycotome spinosa Ziziphus lotus Lonicera implexa Anabasis articulata Ruta montana Sedum sediforme Lavandula stoechas Bromus sp. Lycium arabicum Medicago hispida Jasminum fruticans Stipa retorta Cytisus triforus Asparagus albus Rhamnus alaternus Artemisia herba alba Asparagus albidus Psoralea bituminosa Salvia pratensis Cupressus sp. Stipa tenacissima Aristida plumosa Asphodelus microcarpus Paronychia capitata Globularia alypum Artemisia campestris Ferula communis Echium pycnanthum Cytisus arborium Vicia monantha Rosmarinus sp. Atractylis caprinus Teucrium sp. Medicago sp. Cutandia dichotoma Sedum amplexicaule Stipa plumosa Thymelaea hirsuta Lotus creticus Olea europea Eruca vesicaria Marrubium supinum Fumana thymifolia Launaea resedifolia Lolium multiforum Anarrhinum fruticosum Pistacia atlantica Thymus algeriensis Djebel El Achch Djebel Messaad Mountain (Saida) Talbi (1989) (*) (M'sila) (This study) (**) Olea europea Stipa tenacissima Arbutus unedo Artemisia herba alba Pistacia lentiscus Stipa parviflora Phillyrea angustifolia Helianthemum sp. Quercus coccifera Thymus algeriensis Calycotome spinosa Cistus libanotis Lonicera implexa Helianthemum lippii Ruta montana Phillyrea media Lavandula stoechas Pistacia terebinthus Lycium arabicum Artemisia absinthium Jasminum fruticans Malva parviflora Cytisus triforus Cynodon dactylon Rhamnus alaternus Heliotropium sp. Asparagus albidus Pinus halepensis Salvia pratensis Fumana thymifolia Stipa tenacissima Artemisia campestris Asphodelus microcarpus Calicotome spinosa Globularia alypum Pituranthos scoparius Ferula communis Quercus ilex Cytisus arborium Sedum sediforme Rosmarinus sp. Anacyclus cyrtolepidioides Teucrium sp. Anarrhinum fruticosum Plantago albicans Bromus rubens Eruca vesicaria Globularia alypum Rosmarinus officinalis Silybum sp. Calligonum comosum
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Benamor, Naceur; Bounaceur, Farid; Baha, Mounia; Aulagnier, Stephane|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2019|
|Previous Article:||Presence of the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra on the islands of Greece: a review.|
|Next Article:||Influence of seasonality, environmental and anthropic factors on crop damage by wild boar Sus scrofa.|