Financial Ombudsman to be reviewed over claims cases may "not have been correctly decided"; It comes after an undercover Channel 4 Dispatches recorded employees claiming cases were rushed and often found in favour of the big banks for time-saving purposes.
The chairwoman of an influential committee of MPs has said it is "troubling" that cases brought to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) may not have been decided correctly.
It comes after the complaints body announced an 'independent' review of the service after a Channel 4 Dispatches investigation found it may be failing consumers.
Nicky Morgan, who chairs the Treasury Committee said: "The FOS is essential in underpinning consumer confidence in the financial services industry, and in redressing the power imbalance between large financial institutions and their customers.
"It is troubling, therefore, that cases may not have been decided correctly."
Millions of Brits paying for faulty goods and poor service - why it's time to beef up our rights
Her comments follow the Dispatches investigation into the way complaints are being handled by the FOS, which has been dealing with surges in payment protection insurance (PPI) complaints in recent years.
The Dispatches programme suggested significant numbers of cases may need to be looked at again after finding evidence that staff with inadequate training or knowledge were deciding people's complaints against financial firms.
Concerns have also been raised that pressure to resolve cases quickly could have led to banks being wrongly favoured.
All these organisations have the power to view your internet browsing history without asking
Following the Dispatches episode, Morgan wrote to Caroline Wayman, chief ombudsman and chief executive of the FOS to address the concerns raised.
In her response, Wayman said that to "better understand and address the concerns raised by the programme, our non-executive board will be appointing an independent person to carry out a review".
Wayman also said: "We feel very strongly that the concerns voiced in the programme do not give a fair impression of the Financial Ombudsman Service when seen against the overall breadth and context of our work."
Responding to a question about whether the FOS has the ability to reopen cases, Ms Wayman said: "The circumstances in which we can reconsider a complaint are extremely limited.
"We may, however, consider the matter afresh if material new evidence subsequently becomes available which the ombudsman considers likely to affect the outcome.
Section 75 claims explained - the credit card super power to defeat dodgy traders
"And as a public body, our decision-making is of course subject to judicial review - which means our decisions come under scrutiny by the courts."
Wayman said since 2010, when the FOS started to see significant volumes of PPI complaints, it has found against banks in around two-thirds of cases.
She said on joining the service, all new case handlers take part in a comprehensive training programme.
'Fraudsters took money out of my account AFTER I told my bank to block it' - your refund rights explained
Commenting on the correspondence, Morgan said: "The Dispatches programme raised concerns about the FOS's decision-making and governance.
"These have been echoed by correspondence received by the committee from current and former FOS employees, who have also expressed dismay about poor culture and low morale."
She continued: "As Ms Wayman says, it's right that cases be reopened if there is any new evidence that might affect the outcome. That must surely include failures in the FOS's own processes."
Morgan said the independent review must consider the FOS's approach to decision-making, the assurance process, and the causes of low staff morale.
She continued: "The committee will want sight of the terms of reference before they are finalised.
"The review should be demonstrably independent, all findings of the review should be published, and the committee will expect to take evidence from the reviewer."
Morgan said she will be writing to Ms Wayman to set out in more detail the committee's expectations of the review, and the committee will consider whether further action is required in response to the correspondence received.
The FoS was introduced in 2000 to manage disputes between banks and consumers
Credit: Bloomberg via Getty Images
Ombudsman adjudicators look into problems involving most types of money matters - from payday loans to pensions, pet insurance to PPI
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Daily Mirror (London, England)|
|Date:||Mar 23, 2018|
|Previous Article:||Passports, Council Tax and more bills that are going up on 1 April - what you need to know; Wages are stagnant but prices certainly aren't. Here's...|
|Next Article:||MPs demand Theresa May award black war hero the Military Cross 100 years after he died; The cross-party alliance says Walter Tull was overlooked for...|