Printer Friendly

Field evaluation of malathion fogging against Japanese encephalitis vector, Culex tritaeniorhynchus.

Malathion technical fogging is considered as a potent tool for the control of vectors of various diseases. The purpose of fogging is to interrupt the further transmission by killing the vectors carrying pathogens. Fogging operation was launched in India in 1970 as an urgent remedial measure (1). Thermal fogging with malathion is very effective in malaria and dengue outbreaks (2), but it has a very little impact in Japanese encephalitis (JE) outbreak, because of its unpredictable and infrequent occurrence (3,4). Due to non-availability of any effective control tool for the control of JE vectors, malathion thermal fogging itself becomes an unavoidable part of vector control in JE outbreak. Malathion technical fogging is, therefore, recommended during JE outbreaks (5).

JE is endemic in Gorakhpur/Basti division since 1978 (6). In Gorakhpur, JE virus has been the leading cause of encephalitis in humans (7). Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) is found to be one of the most important vectors of this disease in this area (8). Every year a number of cases and deaths occur in this division due to this notorious disease (9). Year 2005 was more dreadful, between 29 July to 31 December when 4114 JE cases and 1003 deaths were reported from Gorakhpur/Basti division. Fogging operations with malathion technical were conducted in these areas where suspected JE cases were occurred to interrupt any further transmission. During fogging operations this study was conducted to determine the susceptibility status of target mosquito--Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, the most abundant JE vector in this area.

Present studies were undertaken during pulse fog operations in the Village Pipra Moglan, CHCPipraich of District Gorakhpur on 24 September and Village Parsa Khurd, CHC-Partawal of Maharajganj district on 30 September 2005. Bioassays were conducted according to the method developed by Malaria Research Centre, Delhi, India (10). Indoor resting mosquitoes were also collected using torchlight and aspirator during pre- (1800-1830 hrs) and post-fogging (2000-2030 hrs). Density was represented as per man hour (PMH).

The results revealed that the mortality rate of the mosquito in both the villages was quite high when exposed to malathion fog. In the Village Pipra Moglan, the mean mortality of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus mosquitoes was 98.8% whereas in Parsa Khurd village it was 96.25% (Table 1). Pre-fogging indoor density of this mosquito was 8 PMH in Pipra Moglan. However, after fogging it reduced to 0.5 PMH (87.5% reduction). In Parsa Khurd, pre-fogging indoor density of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus was 6 PMH, however, after fogging it reduced to 0.5 with a percent reduction of 91.66%.

The results suggested that malathion fogging was quite useful in both the districts in reducing the density of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus during outbreak situations. The percent reduction in the indoor density of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus after malathion fogging in both the villages was comparatively lower than the mortality observed in the test cages. It may have happened either due to the entry of new mosquitoes from unexposed area or due to limited penetration of fog inside the rooms. It is essential that all doors and windows are left open so as to achieve the maximum possible penetration of the insecticide. It is reported that, even the impact of an insecticide fog on the vector population will be different from that of a sprayed surface on resting mosquitoes (11). Further, space spraying intends to kill flying mosquitoes by contact with the insecticide in the air (12). High mortality in test (cage kept) mosquito exposed to malathion fog justify its usefulness.

Key words Cage bioassay--Culex tritaeniorhynchus--Japanese encephalitis--malathion

Received: 3 March 2008

Accepted in revised form: 17 May 2008

References

(1.) Sharma SN. Field evaluation of fogging operation in Faridabad complex. Proceedings of the second symposium on vector and vector borne diseases. Natl Acad Vector Borne Dis 1997; p. 95-8.

(2.) Pant CP, Jatansen S. Ground application of ULV malathion for control of vector of Japanese encephalitis in northern Thailand (WHO mimeographed document). WHO/VBC/ 1971; 71: 309.

(3.) Pant CP, Mount, CA, Jatansen SL, Mathis HL. Ultra low volume ground aerosol of technical malathion for the control of Aedes aegypti. Bull WHO 1971; 45: 455-9.

(4.) Sharma VP, Sharma GK, Ansari MA, Mittal PK, Razdan RK, Batra CP. Impact of malathion thermal fogging on mosquito populations in Delhi and its place in malaria control. Indian J Malariol 1986; 25(1): 65-7.

(5.) Japanese encephalitis Information Booklet. Lucknow: Directorate of Medical and Health Services, Uttar Pradesh and Regional Directorate of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India 2005; p. 20.

(6.) Khare JB. Current status of Japanese encephalitis in Uttar Pradesh. Proceedings of the National conference on Japanese encephalitis. New Delhi : Indian Council of Medical Research 1982; p. 22-4.

(7.) Kanojia PC, Shetty PS, Geevarghese G. A long-term study on vector abundance and seasonal prevalence in relation to the occurrence of Japanese encephalitis in Gorakhpur district, Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Med Res 2003; 117: 104-10.

(8.) Srivastava VK, Singh Ajay. Vector fauna of Gorakhpur division, Uttar Pradesh. VII International symposium on vectors and vector born diseases, February 18-20, organized by Department of Zoology, Punjabi University, Patiala (Punjab) in collaboration with National Academy of Vector Borne Diseases, Orissa 2005; p. 45.

(9.) Srivastava VK, Singh A, Sinha NK, Chandra R. Japanese encephalitis situation in Gorakhpur division. J Commun Dis 2003; 55(1): 56-8.

(10.) Space sprays. Protocols for uniform evaluation of insecticides for use in vector control. Delhi: Malaria Research Centre 2005; p. 51-2.

(11.) Lac SS, Vatandoost H, Entezarmahdi, Ashraf H, Abai MR, Nazri M. Monitoring of insecticide resistance in Anopheles sacharovi (Favre 1903) in borderline of Armenia, Naxcivan & Turkey, 2001. Iranian J Public Health 2002; 51(3-4): 96-9.

(12.) Malaria vector control: decision making criteria and procedures for judicious use of insecticides. Geneva: World Health Organization (Communicable Disease Control, Prevention and Eradication) 2003.

Corresponding author: Dr V.K. Srivastava, Zonal Entomologist, Department of Medical and Health, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur-273 001, India.

E-mail: vijayks100@indiatimes.com

V.K. Srivastava (a), Ajay Singh (b) & B.R. Thapar (c)

(a) Department of Medical and Health, Gorakhpur Division; (b) Department of Zoology, DDU Gorakhpur University; (c) National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Delhi, India
Table 1. Percent mortality (after 24 h exposure) of Cx.
tritaeniorhynchus exposed to malathion thermal fogging

Village (District) % mortality * (Range)

Pipra Moglan (Gorakhpur) 98.8 (95.45-100)
Parsa Khurd (Maharajganj) 96.25 (90-100)

* Four replicates each with 20 mosquitoes in each village.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Indian Council of Medical Research
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Srivastava, V.K.; Singh, Ajay; Thapar, B.R.
Publication:Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
Date:Sep 1, 2008
Words:1061
Previous Article:Short research communications: historical analysis of the economic cost of dengue in Australia.
Next Article:Reactivation of Herpes zoster in an adult with Plasmodium infection.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters