Printer Friendly

Federal judge puts McKenzie Bridge timber sale on hold.

Byline: Jeff Wright The Register-Guard

A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Forest Service cannot go forward with a controversial logging project near McKenzie Bridge until an environmental impact statement has been prepared.

People living near the 2,100-acre Goose Project had opposed strongly the logging plans. They said there had been insufficient notice about the project and that they didn't find out about it until it was too late for them to weigh in.

Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild, represented by the Western Environmental Law Center, filed a lawsuit last May challenging the project.

In a ruling dated Thursday and made available late Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken said the timber sale could have a "potentially significant effect" on the environment. As a result, the Forest Service erred in choosing a less stringent environmental assessment, rather than a more demanding environmental impact statement, to assess the potential effects of harvesting an estimated 38 million board feet of lumber from federal land.

Defendants in the lawsuit, in addition to the Forest Service, included the two companies that hope to harvest the timber, Freres Lumber Co. of Lyons and Seneca Sawmill Co. of Eugene. Representatives from the Forest Service and Seneca Sawmill could not be reached for comment Tuesday night.

Aiken's ruling will likely be embraced by McKenzie Bridge area residents who said they didn't learn about the pending timber sale and harvest until last spring. Those residents had little recourse because they didn't have legal standing to challenge the sale - unlike Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild, who did have such standing because they were the only parties to have appealed the project back when it was approved in 2010.

Doug Heiken of Oregon Wild said Tuesday that the ruling is a victory for local residents who will now have a much greater opportunity to be heard on the matter. That's because an environmental impact statement requires greater public participation. "The public gets to comment, so that the decision-maker has the benefit of that information and can make a fully informed decision," Heiken said.

Heiken said the Forest Service "had the chance to get it right a couple of times and stumbled." The agency could have limited the proposed sale to the noncontroversial thinning of dense young timber stands, but instead opted to include the proposed logging of mature forests and logging near riparian areas, he said.

The agency again made a misstep when it decided against inviting public comment after local residents learned of the proposed sale last year, he said. "The Forest Service still had the discretion to do that and avoid this lawsuit," he said.

The proposed timber sale is located on Willamette National Forest lands, mostly north of Highway 126, and would permit the commercial harvest of 2,100 acres.

In her ruling, Aiken sided with the Forest Service on two of three issues that the environmental groups put forward in their lawsuit. She ruled that the federal agency did in fact disclose sufficient information regarding competition for habitat between the barred owl and northern spotted owl. And the agency also disclosed sufficient information on the potential effect of thinning riparian reserves within the timber sale boundaries, she ruled.

In regard to an environmental impact statement, Aiken said that the project would reduce the 9,664-acre Lookout Mountain Potential Wilderness Area by 1,249 acres - resulting in the harvesting of 680 acres of timberland and fragmenting an additional 569 acres from the rest of the potential wilderness area.

In addition to the number of acres logged, the project also would authorize the construction of eight miles of temporary roads and one mile of permanent road, the judge noted.

Under federal law, an environmental impact statement is required if a project "would have a significant effect on the human environment."

None of the environmental issues standing alone necessarily require an environmental impact statement, but taken collectively, they do, Aiken said.
COPYRIGHT 2013 The Register Guard
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Environment
Publication:The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR)
Geographic Code:1U9OR
Date:Mar 27, 2013
Next Article:Choices narrow.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |