Printer Friendly

Fed went too far in crisis, say officials.

WASHINGTON -- The US Federal Reserve's expanded lending to banks and investment firms to stem a credit crisis may end up creating more instability, two Fed officials have said .

Philadelphia Fed president Charles Plosser and his Richmond counterpart, Jeffrey Lacker, in separate speeches expressed concern that the central bank's actions since the crisis began nine months ago could produce a so-called Acents[euro]A"moral hazard" by encouraging risk taking.

The comments highlighted deep rifts at the Fed, which has been aggressively moving to pump liquditity into strained financial markets and took the unusual step of backing a rescue of troubled investment giant Bear Stearns in March.

The efforts to stabilise markets can Acents[euro]A"actually make instability more severe in the long run," said Plosser, a voting member of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee.

The Fed or any other central bank faces the risk of creating more instability any time it intervenes as lender-of-last-resort to financial firms, Plosser told the Society for Financial Econometrics in New York.

Specifically, if lending to major financial institutions is Acents[euro]A"misapplied," it can Acents[euro]A"effectively subsidise risk-taking by systemically important financial institutions," he said.

Lacker, an alternate FOMC member, delivered a blunt warning to an economics conference in London.

Acents[euro]A"The danger is that the effect of recent credit extension on the incentives of financial market participants might induce greater risk taking, which in turn could give rise to more frequent crises, in which case it might be difficult to further resist expanding the scope of central bank lending."

While the financial meltdown that hit investment bank Bear Stearns and the freezing up of markets for asset-backed securities have been compared to old-fashioned runs on a bank, Lacker said it was important to distinguish what he calls fundamental financial motivations from simple mob psychology.

Acents[euro]A"My reading of recent financial market events suggests to me that fundamentals have been at work -- given the large shortfall in mortgage returns confronting the financial sector, the resulting strains should not be surprising," he said.

In March, the Fed engineered a controversial rescue of Bear Stearns as the investment bank teetered on collapse due to mortgage-related losses from the worst housing crisis in decades. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke defends the move as critical to the health of the financial system.

Acents[euro]A"With financial conditions fragile, the sudden failure of Bear Stearns likely would have led to a chaotic unwinding of positions in those markets and could have severely shaken confidence," Bernanke said in April testimony to Congress.

Plosser said that the new environment and the Acents[euro]A"opacity of the so-called shadow banking system" was making it more difficult for central bankers to distinguish fundamental repricing from simple panic. Acents[euro]A"It is less clear how to distinguish disruptions in the efficient functioning of financial markets that call for central bank intervention from necessary market corrections to asset prices," Plosser said.

[c] Muscat Press and Publishing House SAOC 2008

Provided by an company
COPYRIGHT 2008 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Times of Oman (Muscat, Oman)
Date:Jun 9, 2008
Previous Article:Oil price leaps over $134 on weak dollar: Morgan report.
Next Article:Inflation is biggest risk for Asian credit, says Morgan.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |