Printer Friendly

Fecundity, growth, and survival of the angelfish Pterophyllum scalare (Perciformes: Cichlidae) under laboratory conditions.

The freshwater angelfishes (Pterophyllum) are South American cichlids that originate from the Guyana, and the Orinoco and Amazon River basins. In the wild, their reproductive season is around January, at a water temperature between 28 and 30[degrees]C. Angelfishes are very popular among aquarists all over the world, yet scarce information on their culture and aquarium husbandry exists (Axelrod & Shaw 1967, Perez 1984), and little has been reported regarding scientific measurements of its growth and fecundity (Martty 1977).

Nutrition has an important influence on growth and reproductive potential of aquarium fishes, and live foods are often advocated as a means to enhance these factors. For example, Reyes-Bustamante (1999), studying the goldfish (Carassius auratus), fighting fish (Betta splendens) and gourami (Trichogaster trichopterus), showed that juvenile fish raised on live rotifera (Brachionus plicatilis) and the cladoceran (Daphnia magna) yielded better growth than those fed with two different formulations of commercial dry fish food.

Similar nutritional studies using live foods have been documented for angelfish. For example, Figueroa et al. (1977) found that angelfish fed exclusively with D. pulex produced larger and more frequent spawnings with greater fry survival than those fed exclusively on a commercial dry flake.

The aim of this study was to quantify fecundity, growth, and survival of eggs and larvae of angelfish cultured under laboratory conditions, and using two different live food diets and one commercial dry diet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed under laboratory conditions at the Autonomous University of Sinaloa in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico.

Fish: Mature angelfish, 9 to 10 months old, were used for the study. These fish were second generation stock that had been bred on site (Table 1).

Water conditions: Throughout the study, fish were maintained under the following water parameters: temperature 24.3 to 30[degrees]C; pH 7.8 to 9.0. Water quality was maintained by bio-filtration and total water changes were performed every 15 days, after the first 30 days (weaning).

Spawning conditions: Fish were settled in an 80L aquarium, and allowed to pair naturally. Each formed pair was transferred to its own aquarium containing a plastic plate positioned diagonally, to serve as a spawning surface. After spawning, the eggs were reared artificially. The plastic plate with the eggs attached was transferred to another aquarium and an air supply was placed near the egg clutch to create water movement and aeration.

Measurements: Data was registered from 20 spawnings. The eggs within each clutch were counted (number of eggs), then the mother fish was measured (length mm and height mm), and weighed (weight g) to obtain the relative fecundity: En=z/W, where En=number of eggs per weight (g) of fish; z=number of eggs; W=total weight of fish. The rate of fecundity for weight was calculated using the regression line, Number of eggs=a + b (W), where W: total weight, a: y-intercept, b: slope. Additionally, live larvae were counted to obtain the fertilization rate: live eggs/number of eggs x 100 (Table 1).

Rearing diets: Three different diets were used during 135 days to calculate the growth in length and height of 100 larvae in 40L aquariums.

Diet A: Decapsulated cysts of Artemia sp. were used to feed angelfish larvae once a day at a rate of 4cysts/mL for 10 days, thereafter a rate of 6cysts/mL was used until the end of the study. The fish eat ad libitum.

Diet B: Small flakes of "Tetramin" balanced food to fit the size of the mouth were given at about 6% to the fish biomass in three rations per day.

Diet C: Once the vitellarium sac had been absorbed, rotifers, Brachionus plicatilis, were given at a rate of 10/mL for 10 days; thereafter, 2 cladocerans D. magna 7/mL were given three times per day until the end of the study. The fish eat ad libitum.

To calculate growth an average of ten fish were used every 15 days. The length (cm) and height (cm) of angelfish larvae samples were first measured using a hematocytometer under a stereoscopic microscope. Later, when the larvae reached more than 5mm in length, a petri dish with millimetric paper was used. Fry wet weight was measured with an Ohaus 480 scale balance (0.001g) using the difference between a known water volume and one with fry.

Also, during 135 days (November 1st to March 15th), using the three different diets mentioned before, the instantaneous total mortality rate (Z) was estimated for 80 larvae/40 L aquarium through the Beverton & Holt (1959) method and described in Ricker (1975), Nt=[N.sub.0] e -Z t, where [N.sub.0] and Nt are the number of born fish larvae at the beginning and at the end of the period of the culture time (t). Survival (S) of eggs and larvae was also calculated as follows, S=Nt/[N.sub.0] and mortality M=1- S, expressed as percentage. The Excel program was used. The multiple comparisons of Tukey of the growth slops were estimated.

RESULTS

Fecundity and eggs survival: Table 1 shows that there was a maximum of 1082 eggs for a female weight of 50g, length of 22.0, and height of 28.8cm and a minimum of 234 eggs for another of 20g weight, length of 12.5, and height of 15cm, with an average of 468.8 (SD[+ or -]193.97) eggs per fish. The relative fecundity varied from 11.44 to 21.64 eggs per gram of female with an average of 16.39 (SD[+ or -]2.79). The number of eggs increased 20.69 for each unit of weight (Fig. 1). The relation between number of eggs per live eggs was as follows: Number of eggs=0.9464 (live eggs)+6.3618, [R.sup.2]=0.9924, n=20. Yield survival larvae varied from 87 to 100% with an average of 96% in 60 days.

Growth: The length, height, and weight growth of the fish larvae born from November 1st to March 15th using the three different diets are depicted in Fig. 2. The best growth was attained with diet A, reaching 6.3cm in length, 5.9cm in height, and 3.62g in weight, followed by diet C with 5.15cm, 5.10cm, and 3.00g, respectively, and the lowest was attained with diet B yielding 4.81cm, 4.79cm, and 2.8g, respectively. Tukey method confirmed that diet A was significantly different from diets B and C, and this two diets themselves showed no differences in growths at P>0.50.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

In general, the greater the fish grows more eggs will be produced, as mentioned before. Although there are statistical differences in growth, it is important to note that diets A (Artemia cysts) and C (rotifers-cladocerans) have a higher cost than diet B (balanced inert

food).

Mortality: Total mortality for 2 fish larvae/ mL in 40L aquarium in 135 days using the three different diets (Fig. 3); the instantaneous total mortality rate (Z) was 0.0026, 0.0043, and 0.0040, respectively; with diet A the mortality was 33.8%; with diet C, 43.8%; and with diet B, 50.0 %. The best survival percentage was attained with diet A at 66.25%.

DISCUSSION

Temperatures recorded in this study are suitable for culturing angelfish according to Martty & Couto (1976). Aries (1972) recommends a temperature variation between 28 to 30[degrees]C for reproduction as found in this experiment.

Swingle (1961) recommended a pH variation between 6.5 and 9, values higher or lower prevent reproduction, although Axelrod (1976) reported that angelfish prefer a pH lower than 7 in the Amazon River effluents. In this paper was between 7.8 and 9.0.

The type of food has an important influence on the nutrition of fish larvae. Shirota (1970) related the size of the mouth of marine fish larvae and the prey size by an index. Lavens & Sorgeloos (1996) and Coutteau (1996) mentioned those fish larvae of 2 to 3mm preys on 300[micro]m organisms, whereas fish larvae of 3 to 5mm prey on 1mm organisms. Rottmann (1989) mentioned that adults of Moina (700-1 000[micro]m) are bigger than Artemia nauplii (500[micro]M) and three times more than rotifers. D. magna is twice as big as Moina, reason for which it is recommended to feed angelfish larvae older than 10 days.

In commercial fish culture, rotifers are the first live food given, from day 2 to 20; actually no other live food substitute has yet been used (Maeda & Hino 1991).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Watanabe et al. (1983) and Tamaru et al. (1991) reported that fish larvae of 2 to 3mm should be fed with rotifers during the first 30 days until they reach 7 to 10mm length, and then fed them with a mix of copepods and cladocerans or Artemia nauplii. Once the larvae are 10mm long, the food could be fish flour, and larvae size ends when they reach 30 to 50mm. Degani (1993) found that juvenile angelfish increase growth adding live Artemia to different diets with high protein, he suggest Artemia contains a micro-element that is absent in artificial food. In the present paper the best growth was using live Artemia cysts as food, also survival was higher than using artificial food.

Figueroa et al. (1977) found that angelfish fed with D. pulex spawned between 857 and 959 eggs, whereas with "Wardley" (balance food) spawning reached only 363 eggs. Survival was of 91% fed with D. pulex versus 62% fed with "Wardley". In this work a similar food as "Wardley", "Tetramin" was used. The results show less growth and higher mortality than using live food.

Knowledge on fecundity and survival are important issues for planning a good production of angelfish larvae and juveniles; besides, it is relevant to know that live food is much better for growing fish than most of the commercial balanced foods.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We appreciate the technical support of A. Aguilar A., A. Nunez P. and C. Ramirez J.

Received 17-X-2006. Corrected 05-iv-2009. Accepted 07-v-2009.

REFERENCES

Aries, S.S. 1972. Discus & Scalare. Ediciones Littec, Buenos Aires, Argentine.

Axelrod, H. R. 1976. Breeding aquarium fishes. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey, USA.

Axelrod, H. R, & S.R. Shaw. 1967. Breeding aquarium fishes. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey, USA.

Beverton, R.J.H. & S.J. Holt. 1959. A review of the life span and mortality rates of fish in nature, and their relation to growth and other physiological characteristics. CIBA Found. Colloq Age. 5: 142-177.

Coutteau, P. 1996. Microalgae, p. 7-47. In Manual on the production and use of live food for aquaculture. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 361. FAO, Rome, Italy.

Figueroa, T.J., R.G. Berrum & F.J. Luna. 1977. Reproduccion del pez angel Pterophyllum scalare var. Perlada, p. 109. In V Congreso Nacional de Ictiologia, Mazatlan Sinaloa, Mexico.

Degani, G. 1993. Growth and body composition of juveniles of Pterophyllum scalare (Lichtenstein) (Pisces: Cichlidae) at different densities and diets. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 24: 725-73.

Lavens, P. & P. Sorgeloos. 1996. Manual on the production, and use of live food for aquaculture. FAO, Fish. Tech. Pap. 361. Rome, Italy.

Maeda, M. & A. Hino. 1991. Environmental management for mass culture of the rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis, p.125-134. In Rotifer and micro-algae culture system. W. Fulks & K. L. Main (eds.). Proceedings of a US-Asia Workshop. The Oceanic Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

Martty, A.H. 1977. Alimentacion de peces ornamentales. Albatros, Buenos Aires, Argentine.

Martty, A.H. & D.D. Coutto. 1976. Peces tropicales y el novicio. Albatros, Buenos Aires, Argentine.

Perez, S.L.A. 1984. Piscicultura. El manual moderno.

Reyes-Bustamante, H. 1999. Evaluacion y optimizacion de la produccion de microalgas del rotifero Brachionus plicatilis y del cladocero, Daphnia magna bajo diferentes condiciones de cultivo. Tesis Doctoral. Colegio de Ciencias y Humanidades, Unidad Academica de los Ciclos Profesionales y de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico.

Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation, and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Canada 191.

Rottmann, R.W. 1989. Daphnia culture. Florida. Aquarium Farms Inc. 1: 99-123.

Shirota, A. 1970. Studies on the mouth size of fish larvae. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish. 36: 353-368.

Swingle, H.S. 1961. Relationships of pH of pond waters to their suitability for fish culture. Proceed. Pac. Sci. Cong. 9: 72-75.

Tamaru, C.S., Lee, C. & H. Ako. 1991. Improving the larval rearing of striped mullet (Mugil cephalus) by manipulating quantity and quality of the rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis, p. 89-104. In Rotifer and micro-algae culture system, W. Fulks & K. L. Main (eds.). Proceedings US-Asia Works, The Oceanic Institute, Hawaii, USA.

Watanabe, T., C. Jitajima & S. Fujita. 1983. Nutritional value of live food organisms used in Japan for mass culture of fish. Rev. Aqua. 34: 115-143.

Armando A. Ortega-Salas (1) *, Isabel Cortes G. (2) & Hugo Reyes-Bustamante (1)

(1.) Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia, UNAM. Calzada Joel Montes Camarena s/n Apdo. Post. 811, Mazatlan, 82040 Sinaloa, Mexico; ortsal@mar.icmyl.unam.mx

(2.) Depto. de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnologicas, Universidad de Sonora, Rosales y Ninos Heroes s/n, Col. Centro, Apdo. Postal 1819, Hermosillo 83000, Sonora, Mexico.

* Corresponding author
TABLE 1

Measurements of Pterophyllum scalare and its relation with
fecundity and eggs survival

CUADRO 1

Medidas del Pterophyllum scalare y su relacion con fecundidad y
supervivencia de huevos

         Number    Weight   Length   Height
Female   of eggs    (g)      (cm)     (cm)    Live eggs

1          530       32      16.5     20.0       463
2          332       25      17.0     23.7       332
3         1082       50      22.0     28.8      1028
4          297       18      12.5     13.0       271
5          417       27      17.0     20.0       415
6          234       20      12.5     15.0       228
7          445       32      16.5     20.0       410
8          421       25      17.0     23.7       415
9          403       27      17.0     20.0       400
10         506       27      17.0     20.0       498
11         462       32      16.5     20.0       417
12         413       25      17.0     23.7       410
13         868       50      22.0     28.8       837
14         385       18      12.5     12.5       359
15         309       27      17.0     20.0       301
16         374       20      12.5     15.0       370
17         518       32      16.5     20.0       512
18         364       25      17.0     23.7       350
19         505       27      17.0     20.0       485
20         511       27      17.0     20.0       500
Mean      468.8     28.3     16.5     20.4       450
SD        193.9     8.58     2.58     4.36      184.2
SE        43.3      1.9      0.57     0.97       41.2

         Fertilization rate   Relative
Female     from live eggs     Fecundity

1              87.36            16.56
2               100             13.28
3              95.01            21.64
4              91.25            16.50
5              99.52            15.44
6              97.44            11.70
7              92.13            13.91
8              98.57            16.84
9              98.26            14.93
10             98.42            18.74
11             90.26            14.44
12             99.27            16.52
13             96.43            17.36
14             93.25            21.39
15             97.41            11.44
16             98.93            18.70
17             98.84            16.19
18             96.15            14.56
19             96.04            18.70
20             97.85            18.93
Mean           96.11            16.4
SD              3.51             2.79
SE              0.78             0.62
COPYRIGHT 2009 Universidad de Costa Rica
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Ortega-Salas, Armando A.; Cortes G., Isabel; Reyes-Bustamante, Hugo
Publication:Revista de Biologia Tropical
Article Type:Report
Date:Sep 1, 2009
Words:2577
Previous Article:Natural and human-induced variability in the composition of fish assemblages in the Northwestern Cuban shelf.
Next Article:Diversity and distribution of vascular epiphytes in an insular Brazilian coastal forest.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters