Fatal vascular retroperitoneal injury following bone marrow biopsy.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy are thought to be safe procedures. Although some hazards are recognised, the true incidence of the adverse effects was unknown until an investigation by members of the British Society of Haematologists, (1) prompted by the death of a patient in 2001 as a result of retroperitoneal haemorrhage after an aspirate and a trephine biopsy from the posterior iliac fossa. (2)
This survey of 54 890 procedures included 26 adverse events, 1 death directly attributable to the procedure and 1 death from sepsis that may have been indirectly attributable to the procedure. The most common adverse event was bleeding (14 cases). Since serious adverse events were reported in less than 0.05% of procedures they can be regarded as rare. Only 2 deaths have been reported in the UK over a period of 30 years. The common complications of this procedure include bleeding, infection and chronic pain. In these cases haemorrhage was associated with risk factors (myeloproliferative disorders, aspirin, platelet dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, obesity and disseminated intravascular coagulation) and the patients required sustained blood transfusion. Some of them developed secondary infection and subsequently died. Surveys (2,3) suggest that retroperitoneal haemorrhage may be more hazardous than haemorrhage into the buttock, possibly because of delayed diagnosis. In patients with retroperitoneal haemorrhage, embolisation of a bleeding vessel may obviate the need for hazardous surgery. Fatal complications have been reported following sternal aspirations resulting in cardiac tamponade.
Our patient sustained laceration to the left superior gluteal artery. Superior gluteal artery laceration as a complication of iliac crest bone graft surgery was first described by Kahn (3) in 1978. Recommended management of superior gluteal artery or vein injuries has included direct pressure, surgical procedures and angiographic embolisation. A surgical technique to control bleeding from the superior gluteal artery has been described. (4) This technique involves extension of the posterior iliac bone graft incision, detachment of the origin, and reflection of the gluteus maximus thus providing excellent exposure for haemostasis of the iatrogenic laceration of the superior gluteal artery. This technique is simple and effective and may prevent the need for transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches or angiographic embolisation. It allows control of a haemorrhage by a simple extension orthopaedic exposure.
This method of exposure was an option for this patient, for whom major surgery posed a high risk. However, following unsuccessful embolisation, surgical intervention was not undertaken because of his cardiac morbidity.
(1.) Bain BJ. Bone marrow biopsy morbidity and mortality. Br J Haematol 2003; 121: 949-951.
(2.) Bain BJ. Bone marrow biopsy morbidity: review of 2003. J Clin Pathol 2003; 58: 406-408.
(3.) Kahn B. Superior gluteal artery laceration, A complication of iliac bone graft surgery. Clin Orthop 1979; 140: 204-207.
(4.) Shin AY, Moran ME. Superior gluteal artery injury secondary to posterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting. A surgical technique to control haemorrhage. Spine 1996; 21: 1371-1374.
Dr Chamisa is a general surgeon currently working at Prince Mishyeni Hospital, Durban. He did his postgraduate training in Zimbabwe, South Africa, Scotland, England and Wales. His interests include evidence-based medicine.
Corresponding author: I Chamisa (email@example.com)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Clinical Images|
|Publication:||South African Medical Journal|
|Article Type:||Case study|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2007|
|Previous Article:||Life-threatening angio-oedema and death associated with the ACE inhibitor enalapril.|
|Next Article:||Assessing scimitar syndrome--use of MRI and MRA.|