Fatal gastrointestinal perforations in sudden death cases in last 10 years at UMMC--Malaysia.
KEY WORDS: Gastrointestinal perforation, peptic ulcer perforation, peritonitis, sudden deaths, silent perforations in sudden death, autopsy.
Gastrointestinal perforation is one of the major complications that may result in sudden death. Perforation of the intestine leads to leakage of intestinal contents into the abdominal cavity causing peritonitis.
Perforation can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract like esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, small intestine, large intestine, sigmoid colon and rectum. The common site is duodenum where is called peptic ulcer (1).
Gastrointestinal perforation can be caused by chronic inflammation due to Helicobacter pylori, NSAIDs like aspirin, stress, and life style factors like excessive smoking, alcohol, tea or coffee consumption. It can also caused by a variety of illnesses, including appendicitis, diverticulitis, ulcer disease, Crohn's disease, and less commonly, infections of the bowel, such as infectious colitis (1, 2).
Symptoms of a gastrointestinal ulceration can be abdominal pain, hematemesis, melena, weight loss. Rarely, an ulcer can lead to a gastric or duodenal perforation. Complications includes bleeding, infection, and formation of intra-abdominal abscesses (1).
MATERIAL AND METHOD:
The autopsy reports of a period 10 years from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2005 available in the Forensic Unit of the Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur were scrutinized in respect of age, sex, dietary habits, ethnic groups, site of perforation, time of perforation, presenting symptoms and relation between perforation and death . The risk factors that could contribute to the formation of ulcers and later perforation of the gastrointestinal tract such as smoking cigarettes, consumption of foods and beverages containing caffeine, alcohol abuse, and physical stress were also studied.
Out of 61 cases subjected to post mortem examination following sudden death due to gastrointestinal perforation at this hospital over a period of ten years, there were 49 males (80.3%) and 12 female (19.7%), giving a male to female ratio of 4.076:1 [Figure 1]. According to ethnicity, over ten years, incidence of gastrointestinal perforation predominantly occurred in Chinese with 27 cases (44.3%), followed by Indian with 18 cases (29.5%), Malays with 5 cases (8.2%) and other races with 11 cases (18%) [Figure 2]. The frequency in 2005 which was 11 cases (18%) was the highest over the ten years. We conclude that the frequency of death that related with gastrointestinal perforation was on increase throughout the 10 years except for 1999, 2002 and 2004. The lowest frequency was 3 cases. It was in 1996, 1997 and 1999 and this is 4.9% of the whole cases [Figure 3]. In terms of ethnic groups, Malay showed the highest incidence in 2002 with 2 cases; Chinese, in 2005 with 6 cases; Indian, in 2005 with 5 cases; and others with 4 cases in 2001. The average age of the deceased was 43.99 years old (range 5 months--82 years), with an almost equal age of occurrence for males (43.37 years) and females (43 years). The average age group of the deceased was 41 to 50 years old. The highest incidence occurred in 31-40 years old category and the > 60 years old category, which comprised of 23% each. . The lowest incidence occurred in 11-20 years old category, which comprised of 1.7% only [Figure 4]. In our study, majority of the perforation cases occurred as single perforation was (67.2%). There were 32.8% of multiple perforations. The most common site for gastrointestinal perforation was at the stomach (45.7%), followed by duodenum (18.5%), large intestine (16.0%), esophagus (9.9%), and small intestine (9.9%) [Figure 5]. In our study, 23.8% of the deceased were asymptomatic but there was some limitations of the detail as some autopsy reports had incomplete histories. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom complained by the deceased (23.8%), followed by hematemesis (14.3%) and vomiting (14.3%) [Figure 6]. 34 of the deceased had peritonitis, which was 55.74%. Peritonitis is probably a complication of gastrointestinal perforation. 13 of the deceased were alcohol consumers, which was 21.31%. 7 deceased were smokers, which was 11.48%. One deceased was a tea/ coffee consumer, which was 1.64%. One deceased was taking aspirin, which was 1.64%. A total of 36.07% deceased was associated with at least one risk factor.
The incident rate of fatal gastrointestinal perforation in autopsy cases in last 10 years at this hospital was 1.09%.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
From the result, we conclude that gastrointestinal perforations occur more frequently among men than women. This is believed to be due to the lifestyles and also the risk factors that could contribute to the formation of ulcers and later perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. These factors included cigarette smoking, consumption of foods and beverages containing caffeine, alcohol abuse, and physical stress. Men are more prone to these effects, as for example they smoke rather than women. This can explain why the sex ratio is 4.076:1. From the literature review, male incidence is slightly higher than female which is in duodenal ulcer the ratio between men and women is 2:1 while in gastric ulcer the ratio is 1:1. The ratio in gastric ulcer is the same due to predominant use of NSAIDs in women (3).
Based on the differences of frequencies of cases compared with ethnics groups, we conclude that there is a relationship with death due to gastrointestinal perforation and ethnic groups. One of the factors probably is lifestyle. For example in terms of drinks, Muslim mostly Malay, do not take alcohol which is one of the risk factors in getting perforation, compared to Chinese and Indian, who consume alcohol. From literature review, no specific relationship between ethnic groups and the occurrence of duodenal ulcer exists in United States (4). In Malaysia, there are various multi ethnic groups and this hospital area has 55% population of Chinese, and thus comparison with other countries may not be relevant.
Predominant age for duodenal ulcer was 25-75 years old, and it was not seen before the age of 15. For gastric ulcer, the peak incidence occurred at age of 55-65 years old and it was rare below the age of 40. Overall peak incidence of gastrointestinal ulcer was found over the age of 60 year (3). In our study, the highest incidence happened in 31-40 year old category and the > 60 years old category, which comprised of 23% each. Thus, the highest category (> 60 years old) of our study is similar to other reviews. As for 31-40 year old age group, we found out that 42.86% of them had at least one risk factor, i.e. tobacco, alcohol, aspirin intake or tea/coffee consumption.
Duodenal ulcer is 4 times more common than gastric ulcer. For gastric ulcer, the lesser curvature of the stomach is the most likely site. Less than 5 % of ulcers lead to perforation. Duodenal ulcers perforate more commonly than gastric ulcers, usually into peritoneal cavity (5). In our study, the most common site for gastrointestinal perforation was at the stomach (45.7%), followed by duodenum (18.5%), large intestine (16.0%), esophagus (9.9%), and small intestine (9.9%). Our result is different from other studies for which we did not have any reasonable explanation.
The risk factors that can contribute to the formation of ulcers and later perforation of the gastrointestinal tract include cigarettes smoking, foods and consumption of beverages containing caffeine, alcohol abuse, and physical stress. In our study, there were 36.07% deaths which were associated with at least one risk factor. 23.8% did not give symptom prior to death, probably these were silent perforations.
This is a retrospective study conducted by reviewing autopsy reports of 10 years period (1996-2005). During that period there were 61 cases of gastrointestinal perforation. The conclusions from this study are as follows:
* The incident rate of fatal gastrointestinal perforation was 1.09%.
* Male was the predominant sex for gastrointestinal perforation, with M: F ratio 4:1.
* Chinese with 27 cases (44.3%) was the highest ethnic group affected, followed by Indians with 18 cases (29.5%), Malays with 5 cases (8.2%) and other races with 11 cases (18%).
* The frequency in 2005 which had 11 cases (18%) was the highest during the ten years.
* The average age group of the deceased was 41 to 50 years old. The highest incidence happened in 31-40 years old category and the > 60 year old category, which comprised 23% each.
* Majority of the perforation occurred as single perforation that was 67.2%. There were 32.8% of multiple perforations.
* The most common site for gastrointestinal perforation was at the stomach (45.7%), followed by duodenum (18.5%), esophagus (9.9%), small intestine (9.9%), and large intestine (16.0%).
* Abdominal pain was the most common symptom presented by the deceased and that was seen in 23.8%.
* The 36.07% cases had positive correlation with one of the known risk factors.
* Silent perforation was present in 23.8% in total perforations observed here.
(Received 02 July 2006 and accepted 01 August 2006)
(1.) Norman S Kato. Gastrointestinal perforation. July2004;(14): http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/a rticle/000235.htm Accessed on 2/6/2006.
(2.) Gupta Sanjay, Kaushik Robin, Sharma Rajeev, Attri Ashok. The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers. BMC Surgery 2005;5:15. http://www.biomedcentral.com/14712482/5/15. Accessed on 16/2/2006.
(3.) Mark R Dambro. 2006 Griffith's 5 Minute Clinical Consult, Ver: 8.0.1/2005.9.28.
(4.) Shane M Devlin. Duodenal Ulcer. July2005;(18): http://www.emedicine.com. Accessed on 2/6/2006.
(5.) Ballinger, Patchett. Saunder's Pocket Essentials Clinical Medicine-3/e, Ver:7.0.0/2004.4.16.
Dr. OP Murty, Dr. Lye Yik Fan, Dr. Tan Ley Siang, Dr. Nurull Eddayu binti Hasbullah, Dr. Nurul Azwa binti Mohd Ismail
Forensic Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Corresponding Address: Dr. O.P. Murty, Associate Professor and Head, Forensic Pathology Unit, University of Malaya, 59100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Email: email@example.com
Figure 1: M: F Ratio following fatal GI perforations 4.076: 1 Female 19.7% Male 80.3% Note: Table made from pie chart. Figure 3: Frequencies of cases from 1996 to 2005 YEAR 1996 3 1997 3 1998 4 1999 3 2000 4 2001 10 2002 8 2003 10 2004 5 2005 11 Note: Table made from bar graph. Figure 4: Number of cases according to age in decades Age group Missing 2 1-10 years 5 11-20 yrs 1 21-30 yrs 6 31-40 yrs 14 41-50 yrs 11 51-60 yrs 8 >60 ys 14 Note: Table made from bar graph. Figure 6: Frequencies of symptoms presented by deceased SYMPTOMS Percent no symptom 24 haematemesis 14 abdominal pain 24 fever 8 nausea 2 vomiting 14 loss of appetite melene 6 weight loss chest pain 5 Note: Table made from bar graph.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Murty, O.P.; Fan, Lye Yik; Siang, Tan Ley; Hasbullah, Nurull Eddayu binti; Ismail, Nurul Azwa binti|
|Publication:||Internet Journal of Medical Update|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2007|
|Previous Article:||Management of clostridium difficile diarrhoea in district general hospital, audit for 3 months and review of literature.|
|Next Article:||A mole in the sole: case report on eccrine poroma.|