Falsely low urinary albumin concentrations after prolonged frozen storage of urine samples.
We investigated the effects of storage at -20 [degrees]C for up to 24 months, mixing methods, and baseline UAC on samples in the normo- and microalbuminuric ranges. Urine samples were collected during the prospective PREVEND study in the general population initiated to investigate urinary albumin excretion as a predictor of renal and cardiovascular disease (28). The participants were asked to collect urine for two 24-h periods and to store it in two 3-L plastic containers at 7 [degrees]C and deliver it within 2 days to the clinic. Immediately after delivery, the urine sample volume was determined, and a portion of each of the 24-h samples was stored in 2-mL polypropylene aliquots at -20 [degrees]C for albumin assessment after freezing. For measurement of UAC in fresh samples, portions were kept at 7[degrees]C in 10-mL polystyrene tubes until the UAC was measured.
All participants gave written informed consent. The PREVEND study was approved by the local medical ethics committee and was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.
On the basis of the fresh UAC and duration of storage, we selected 1785 urine samples for the study. Samples were obtained from storage (-20 [degrees]C) 1-3 days before analysis, thawed at 7 [degrees]C, and randomly assigned to 3 groups. Samples in the first group (I; n = 600) were not mixed before analysis, samples in the second group (II; n = 596) were subjected to 3-4 hand inversions before analysis, and samples in the third group (III; n = 689) were vortex-mixed for 5-10 s. All samples were centrifuged before analysis and analyzed directly after centrifugation. At the time of analysis the samples were at room temperature. Samples were thawed and analyzed in the same laboratory.
UAC was measured by immunonephelometry (Dade Behring Diagnostics) with a lower limit of detection of 2.3 mg/L (defined as the concentration of the lowest calibrator solution). The intra- and interassay CVs, evaluated in our laboratory, were 2.7% and 4.5%, respectively.
All data were analyzed with SPSS 12.0 software. Data are presented as mean (SD) percentage differences in albumin, which had a gaussian distribution. Differences among groups were assessed by AMOVA, and differences between groups by post hoc analysis according to Tukey. t-Tests for single groups were used to test whether differences in UAC were statistically different from zero. To investigate whether the effect of duration of storage and baseline UAC were independent of UAC difference, we performed a multiple linear regression analysis using percentage UAC difference as an independent variable. Potential interactions were tested. Statistical significance was determined as a P value <0.05.
After 3-5 months of storage, there was a considerably larger change in UAC in unmixed samples than in samples that were subjected to either vortex-mixing or hand inversions [-34.9 (28.6)% vs -5.3 (30.6)% and -2.6 (27.5)%, respectively; P <0.001]. These latter two changes were not markedly different from zero. Only the samples of groups II and III were included in further analyses. The differences amounted to -23.7 (26.2)% and -26.1 (24.7)% after 18-24 months of storage, respectively (P <0.001 in both groups). Overall post hoc analysis showed no major differences in albumin decrease between groups II and III (P >0.05) for all durations of storage and concentration categories; therefore, for further analysis, we combined the 2 groups. The combined data for percentage change according to concentration categories and duration of storage are shown in Table 1. The UAC difference stabilized at ---30% after 8 months of storage. The large SD in the changes in UAC suggests large differences among samples in the response of UAC to freezing.
The percentage changes in albumin concentration in individual samples after 3-5 months or 18-24 months are shown in Fig. 1. Specimens with a high baseline UAC responded differently to freezing than those with a low UAC. A maximum change of -28 (33)% was seen in the 10-20 mg/L category. The samples in the concentration group 200-500 mg/L showed a markedly smaller change compared with the samples in the other groups (P <0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed no interaction between initial UAC and duration of storage.
The data indicate that urine samples can be stored for 5 months without great changes in mean albumin concentration when samples are mixed adequately after thawing. The change in UAC varies among samples with large variations in the lower concentration ranges.
Although several studies have investigated the effect of freezing on UAC, most studied only shorter storage times, different concentrations of albumin, and smaller numbers of urine samples. Innanen et al. (21) and Collins et al. (22) found no substantial difference after 6 months. Two authors reported no substantial change in UAC after 24 (29) and 26 months (30); the UACs in those studies, however, were considerably higher than in ours. In the first study (29), a nonsignificant 10% loss in albumin was seen in 10 samples, a change consistent with the -10% decrease we found in samples with a concentration of 200-500 mg/L. Shield et al. (30) also reported that urine samples with higher albumin concentrations are less prone to change in UAC after freezing for up to 6 months. We emphasize the importance of the effect of freezing on samples in the microalbuminuric (20-200 mg/L) range because microalbuminuria is an early predictor of cardiovascular and renal disease (7,14,16,17).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED
Why UAC decreases during freezing is still unknown. It may be that albumin molecules are trapped in the precipitate because of an alteration in pH of the urine samples during freezing and thawing (20, 31). Bacterial contamination may also affect UAC. Falsely low values may reflect hydrolysis by bacterial proteases (32). Moreover, storage tube materials might play a role in preventing albumin loss after freezing. Collins et al. (22), however, found no difference in concentration when they studied the effect of different tube materials on UAC after freezing. Conformational changes that occur during freezing may lead to loss of the antibody recognition site that is needed to measure albumin with immunochemical methods (22, 32).
Our study is limited by the fact that we did not investigate possible mechanisms of loss of UAC or the effect of storage at -70 [degrees]C, at which temperature MacNeil et al. (26) found no substantial decrease in UAC after 160 days of storage. We found a large variability in UAC change, a common phenomenon in other studies as well (18, 21, 24, 25, 33, 34). A thorough investigation of all the circumstances that might be involved in the change in albumin after freezing was beyond the scope of our study.
We recommend that albumin be measured in fresh urine samples whenever possible-because specimens respond differently to freezing and thawing and because albumin appears to be less stable in normo- and microalbuminuric samples than in samples with higher albumin concentrations. This effect of freezing must be taken into consideration when microalbuminuria is used as a risk predictor.
This study was supported financially by Grant E.013 of the Dutch Kidney Foundation (Bussum, The Netherlands). We thank Dade Behring (Marburg, Germany) for supplying equipment (Behring Nephelometer 11) and reagents for nephelometric measurement of urinary albumin. We also thank J. van der Wal-Hanewald (laboratory assistant) for concise and meticulous work.
(1.) Parving HH, Oxenboll B, Svendsen PA, Christiansen JS, Andersen AR. Early detection of patients at risk of developing diabetic nephropathy: a longitudinal study of urinary albumin excretion. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1982; 100:550-5.
(2.) Viberti GC, Hill RD, Jarrett RJ, Argyropoulos A, Mahmud U, Keen H. Microalbuminuria as a predictor of clinical nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1982;1:1430-2.
(3.) Mogensen CE. Microalbuminuria as a predictor of clinical diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 1987;31:673-89.
(4.) Mogensen CE, Christensen CK, Vittinghus E. The stages in diabetic renal disease. With emphasis on the stage of incipient diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes 1983;32(Suppl 2):64-78.
(5.) Mogensen CE, Christensen CK. Predicting diabetic nephropathy in insulindependent patients. N Engl J Med 1984;311:89-93.
(6.) Mogensen CE. Microalbuminuria predicts clinical proteinuria and early mortality in maturity-onset diabetes. N Engl J Med 1984;310:356-60.
(7.) Jarrett RJ, Viberti GC, Argyropoulos A, Hill RD, Mahmud U, Murrells TJ. Microalbuminuria predicts mortality in noninsulin-dependent diabetics. Diabet Med 1984;1:17-9.
(8.) Schmitz A, Vaeth M. Microalbuminuria: a major risk factor in noninsulindependent diabetes. A 10-year follow-up study of 503 patients. Diabet Med 1988;5:126-34.
(9.) Messent JW, Elliott TG, Hill RD, Jarrett RJ, Keen H, Viberti GC. Prognostic significance of microalbuminuria in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a twenty-three year follow-up study. Kidney Int 1992;41:836-9.
(10.) Rossing P, Hougaard P, Borch-Johnsen K, Parving HH. Predictors of mortality in insulin dependent diabetes: 10 year observational follow up study. BMJ 1996;313:779-84.
(11.) Allen KV, Walker JD. Microalbuminuria and mortality in long-duration type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2389-91.
(12.) Weis U, Turner B, Gibney J, Watts GF, Burke V, Shaw KM, et al. Long-term predictors of coronary artery disease and mortality in type 1 diabetes. QJM 2001;94:623-30.
(13.) Damsgaard EM, Froland A, Jorgensen OD, Mogensen CE. Eight to nine year mortality in known noninsulin dependent diabetics and controls. Kidney Int 1992;41:731-5.
(14.) Damsgaard EM, Froland A, Jorgensen OD, Mogensen CE. Microalbuminuria as predictor of increased mortality in elderly people. BMJ 1990;300:297300.
(15.) Borch-Johnsen K, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Strandgaard S, Schroll M, Jensen JS. Urinary albumin excretion. An independent predictor of ischemic heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:1992-7.
(16.) Hillege HL, Janssen WM, Bak AA, Diercks GF, Grobbee DE, Crijns HJ et al. Microalbuminuria is common, also in a nondiabetic, nonhypertensive population, and an independent indicator of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular morbidity. J Intern Med 2001;249:519-26.
(17.) Hillege HL, Fidler V, Diercks GF, van Gilst WH, De Zeeuw D, van Veldhuisen DJ et al. Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in general population. Circulation 2002;106:1777-82.
(18.) Giampietro 0, Penno G, Clerico A, Cruschelli L, Cecere M. How and how long to store urine samples before albumin radioimmunoassay: a practical response. Clin Chem 1993;39:533-6.
(19.) Torffvit 0, Wieslander J. A simplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for urinary albumin. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1986;46:545-8.
(20.) Townsend JC. Effect of storage temperature on the precipitation of albumin from urine. Clin Chem 1986;32:1986-7.
(21.) Innanen VT, Groom BM, de Campos FM. Microalbumin and freezing. Clin Chem 1997;43:1093-4.
(22.) Collins AC, Sethi M, MacDonald FA, Brown D, Viberti GC. Storage temperature and differing methods of sample preparation in the measurement of urinary albumin. Diabetologia 1993;36:993-7.
(23.) Tencer J, Thysell H, Andersson K, Grubb A. Stability of albumin, protein HC, immunoglobulin G, ic- and A-chain immunoreactivity, orosomucoid and a 1-antitrypsin in urine stored at various conditions. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1994;54:199-206.
(24.) Osberg I, Chase HP, Garg SK, DeAndrea A, Harris S, Hamilton R, et al. Effects of storage time and temperature on measurement of small concentrations of albumin in urine. Clin Chem 1990;36:1428-30.
(25.) Elving LID, Bakkeren JA, Jansen MJ, Kat Angelino CM, de Nobel E, van Munster PJ. Screening for microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes mellitus: frozen storage of urine samples decreases their albumin content. Clin Chem 1989;35:308-10.
(26.) MacNeil ML, Mueller PW, Caudill SP, Steinberg KK. Considerations when measuring urinary albumin: precision, substances that may interfere, and conditions for sample storage. Clin Chem 1991;37:2120-3.
(27.) d'Eril GM, Valenti G, Pastore R, Pankopf S. More on stability of albumin, N-acetylglucosaminidase, and creatinine in urine samples. Clin Chem 1994;40:339-40.
(28.) Pinto-Sietsma SJ, Janssen WM, Hillege HL, Navis G, De Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. Urinary albumin excretion is associated with renal functional abnormalities in a nondiabetic population. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:1882-8.
(29.) Tencer J, Thysell H, Andersson K, Grubb A. Long-term stability of albumin, protein HC, immunoglobulin G, ic- and A-chain-immunoreactivity, orosomucoid and a1-antitrypsin in urine stored at -20 degrees C. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1997;31:67-71.
(30.) Shield JP, Hunt LP, Morgan JE, Pennock CA. Are frozen urine samples acceptable for estimating albumin excretion in research? Diabet Med 1995;12:713-6.
(31.) Townsend JC, Blair PJ, Forrest AR. Effect of storage pH on precipitation of albumin from urine from diabetics. Clin Chem 1988;34:1355-6.
(32.) Rowe DJ, Dawnay A, Watts GF. Microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus: review and recommendations for the measurement of albumin in urine. Ann Clin Biochem 1990;27:297-312.
(33.) Schultz CJ, Dalton RN, Turner C, Neil HA, Dunger DB. Freezing method affects the concentration and variability of urine proteins and the interpretation of data on microalbuminuria. The Oxford Regional Prospective Study Group. Diabet Med 2000;17:7-14.
(34.) Silver AC, Dawnay A, Landon J. Specimen preparation for assay of albumin in urine. Clin Chem 1987;33:199-200. DOI : 10.1373/clinchem.2005.053777
Jacoline W. Brinkman,  Dick de Zeeuw,  Jacko J. Duker,  Ronald T. Gansevoort,  Ido P. Kema,  Hans L. Hillege,  Paul E. de Jong,  and Stephan J.L. Bakker *
(Departments of Clinical Pharmacology,  Internal Medicine, and  Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and the  Trial and Coordination Center, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; * address correspondence to this author at: University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands; fax 31-50-3639069, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org)
Table 1. Percentage difference in UAC between fresh and thawed samples subjected to mixing according to duration of storage and categories of baseline albumin concentration. Duration of storage, (a) months 3-5 5-8 UAC, mg/L % change n (b) % change n 0-10 -6.7 (31.0) (c) 51 -8.9 (27.8) 66 10-20 -12.0 (35.3) 55 -17.8 (28.2) 38 20-40 -6.2 (30.3) (c) 53 -7.9 (21.4) 33 40-80 3.2 (22.8) (c) 52 -14.9 (25.8) 45 80-200 2.5 (18.3) (c) 33 -16.0 (20.3) 30 200-500 11.3 (10.2) 8 -6.4 (14.4) (c) 13 Total -3.9 (29.0) (c) 252 -12.3 (25.1) 225 P 0.03 0.32 Duration of storage, (a) months 8-12 12-18 UAC, mg/L % change n % change n 0-10 -30.7 (26.4) 44 -19.3 (25.6) 56 10-20 -43.0 (29.0) 38 -39.4 (30.2) 58 20-40 -30.3 (27.3) 51 -28.0 (27.4) 45 40-80 -21.8 (22.0) 45 -27.0 (24.1) 40 80-200 -26.6 (16.8) 37 -19.2 (20.3) 36 200-500 -13.2 (14.7) 9 -15.4 (20.0) 11 Total -29.7 (25.4) 224 -26.7 (27.2) 246 P 0.002 <0.001 Duration of storage, (a) months 18-24 Total UAC, mg/L % change n % change n P 0-10 -25.2 (23.1) 47 -17.2 (28.4) 264 <0.001 10-20 -30.0 (28.3) 43 -28.2 (32.8) 232 <0.001 20-40 -37.4 (30.3) 42 -22.2 (30.3) 224 <0.001 40-80 -22.5 (21.5) 43 -15.7 (25.6) 225 <0.001 80-200 -16.2 (16.6) 34 -15.7 (21.7) 170 <0.001 200-500 -12.6 (16.6) 29 -9.2 (17.4) 70 0.004 Total -24.9 (25.4) 238 -19.3 (28.3) 1185 <0.001 P <0.001 <0.001 (a) Data are presented as the mean (SD). The P values for the overall ANOVA analyses are shown. (b) Number of urine samples. (c) The mean value is not significantly different from zero (t-test, P >0.05).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Technical Briefs|
|Author:||Brinkman, Jacoline W.; de Zeeuw, Dick; Duker, Jacko J.; Gansevoort, Ronald T.; Kema, Ido P.; Hillege|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||The toll-Like receptor 4 Asp299G1y and Thr399Ile polymorphisms influence the late inflammatory response in human endotoxemia.|
|Next Article:||Use of fully denaturing HPLC for UGT1A1 genotyping in Gilbert syndrome.|