Printer Friendly

Fairness of taxes called into question.

Contrary to the letter, "An Opinion on Dividends Taxation" (JofA, Aug.03, page 13), an "honest study of the facts" does in fact prove double taxation of dividends. The real question is whether it is fair to tax corporate earnings and profits multiple times--once at the corporate level and again at the individual level upon distribution. The arguments presented in the letter do not alter reality.

In the universe of taxation, there are many subsets--for example, federal corporate income tax, state corporate income tax, federal individual income tax and state individual income tax. Likewise, corporate taxable income is a subset of corporate earnings and profits. By short definition, dividends generally are cash distributions of previously taxed earnings and profits. Therefore, to tax dividends at any level is to tax previously taxed income.

Regarding stockholders, to assert "they simply own a piece of paper that entitles them to a share of net assets on dissolution and to dividends if corporate management declares any" is simply to ignore the whole truth. Stockholders own a current, undivided interest in the net assets of the corporation. They also have, but are not limited to, the rights to vote for and replace the board of" directors (management), to approve the auditors and to vote on other issues reserved solely to their discretion.

Frank L. King, CPA

Lakewood, Colorado
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:King, Frank L.
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Feb 1, 2004
Previous Article:High score for JofA.
Next Article:Income, not dividends, double-taxed.

Related Articles
TEI urges rejection of proposal for IRS to use private collection agencies.
TEI Salutes Interest-Offset Budget Proposal in Canada.
Openness Is to Implementing Ex Parte Ban on Appeals Communications.
Letters in the Editor's Mailbag.
Letters in the Editor's Mailbag.
Comments on IRS proposed use of private debt collection agencies: June 12, 2002.
Letters in the Editor's Mailbag.
TEI comments on interest imposed on GST: December 20, 2002.
Battling for integrity. (NCEW vs. Planted Opinions).
Tax reform tops TEI's fall advocacy agenda: comments also submitted to the MTC, IRS Chief Counsel, and IRS Oversight Board.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters