Printer Friendly

FREQUENCY OF GASTRIC VARICES IN PATIENTS WITH PORTAL HYPERTENSION BASED ON ENDOSCOPIC FINDINGS.

Byline: Abdul Wahab Mir, Awais Ali Khan, Ammar Anwar Chaudry, Safa Mir, Maria Shahzadi and Naseer Ahmed

ABSTRACT

Objective: To find out the frequency of gastric varices in patients with portal hypertension based on endoscopic findings.

Study Design: Descriptive Study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Gastroenterology, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from Jan to Jun 2011.

Material and Methods: All patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected through consecutive sampling. The patients presenting with hematemesis, melena or ascites with portal hypertension on ultrasound abdomen were admitted in the hospital. The patients were first stabilized hemodynamically and then kept empty stomach for at least four hours before endoscopy. The patients were sedated with intravenous midazolam and endoscopic findings obtained were entered on the patient proforma.

Results: The overall frequency of gastric varices was 11%, whereas 89% had no gastric varices.

Conclusion: A large number of patients with portal hypertension have gastric varices. It is recommended that endoscopy be carried out in all patients with identified portal hypertension.

Keywords: Esophageal varices, Gastric varices, N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, Portal hypertension.

INTRODUCTION

Portal hypertension is defined as a pressure in the portal veins that is at least 5mm higher than the pressure in the inferior vena cava1. The increased pressure is due to a functional obstruction to blood flow from any point in the portal system's origin, through the hepatic veins, into the systemic circulation or from an increase in blood flow in the system. Normal portal pressure is defined between 5 and 10 mm Hg. However, once the portal pressure rises to 12mm Hg or greater, complications can occur, such as varices and ascites. Many conditions are related with portal hypertension, of which cirrhosis is the most common. When portal hypertension is present in lack of cirrhosis, the condition is called "non-cirrhotic portal hypertension". The causes of noncirrhotic portal hypertension can be separated into prehepatic, intrahepatic (presinusoidal, sinusoidal, and post sinusoidal), and post hepatic causes1.

Portal venous pressure (P) is the product of vascular resistance (R) and blood flow (Q) in the portal bed2 In cirrhosis, both intrahepatic.

vascular resistance and portal flow are increased3 Portal hypertension leads to the development of Porto systemic collaterals. However, due to their higher resistance and increased portal venous inflow, these collaterals are unable to diminish the hypertension.

Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage is a common and serious complication of portal hypertension and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Advanced liver failure, failure in controlling variceal bleeding, early rebleed, and marked elevations in portal pressure are related with increased mortality4. Varices are Porto systemic collaterals created after preexisting vascular channels have been dilated by portal hypertension. The most commonly used measurement for portal pressure is the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), (normal gradient being <5 mm Hg). At a hepatic venous pressure gradient of 20% from baseline6. Patients whose HVPG decreases to 1.5, a portal vein diameter of >13 mm, and thrombocytopenia have been found to be predictive of the possibility of varices being present in cirrhotics. If none, one, two, or all three of these conditions are present, then 90% of the patients are likely to have varices, respectively10. The existence of one or more of these conditions represents an indication for endoscopy to search for varices and carry out primary prophylaxis against bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

Although gastric variceal bleeding occurs less often than esophageal varix bleeding, whenever it occurs it tends to be more severe and has a higher mortality than esophageal variceal bleeding11. In a local study, prevalence of gastric varices in patients with portal hypertension was 15 percent12. The management of gastric varices differs from that of esophageal varices in that gastric variceal bleeding are usually much more difficult to control, especially endoscopically13.

Endoscopic therapy for variceal hemorrhage involves use of band ligation, sclerotherapy and tissue glue. Because gastric varices are located deeper in the submucosa than esophageal varices, sclerotherapy and ligation are usually ineffective in controlling acute bleeding from gastric varices and may be harmful. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (tissue glue) has been proven to be effective for bleeding gastric varices14.

Present study will assess the frequency of gastric varices in patients with portal hypertension based on endoscopic findings, which would help to sensitize the treating physicians regarding the load of patients with gastric varices. This study will also help to quantify the patients which require alternative approaches like use of tissue glue for control of variceal bleed. Quantifying patients with gastric varices will help in allocation of hospital budgets for tissue glue purchase, since it's the only endoscopic modality available for treatment of gastric varices at present.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In our study 100 outdoor patients with previously diagnosed portal hypertension, presenting with hematemesis, melena or ascites were selected by non-probability consecutive sampling. Both male and female patients between 15 and 75 years of age and having portal hypertension, either cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic were included in the study. Patients having Shock,atlantoaxial subluxation,possible visceral perforation, severe respiratory disease, recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina and cardiac arrhythmiaswere not included in the study. One hundred patients were selected, admitted, stabilized hemodynamically and kept empty stomach for at least four hours before endoscopy. Permission from hospital ethical committee was obtained (approval attached). All the patients before being subjected to endoscopy were given complete information about the purpose and nature of the study and their consent was obtained.

The patients were sedated with intravenous midazolam and local anesthetic was applied at the back of throat. Patients were made to lie on their left side and endoscopes introduced in the mouth, findings thus obtained wererecorded. Hospital registration number, name, age, gender, address and phone number (optional) were noted.

Table-I: Mean age +- standard deviation of subjects.

###n###Minimum###Maximum###Mean###Std. Deviation

Age in years###100###15###75###52.19###12.744

Table-II: Frequency of gastric varices.

GASTRIC Varices###Frequency###Percent###Valid Percent###Camulative Percent

Positive###11###11.0###11.0###11.0

Negative###89###89.0###89.0###100.0

Total###100###100.0###100.0

Table-III: Gender related frequency of gastric varices.

Gender###Varices###Total

###Positive###Negative

Male###7###60###67

Female###4###29###33

Total###11###89###100

Control of bias and confounding factors was done by strictly following the exclusion criteria. All the data had been analysed through Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 14.0). Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize the data. Mean and standard deviation (+-SD) were calculated for the quantitative variables i.e. age.Frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables i.e. gender, gastric varices and cirrhosis.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were recruited for study after careful scrutiny using above mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria. Mean age was 52.19 years (SD +- 12.744) (table-I). There were 67% males whereas 33% were females. The overall frequency of gastric varices was 11%, whereas 89% had no gastric varices (table-II) (fig). Out of 11 patients positive for gastric varices, 7 were males, and 4 were females (table-III). Among the selected group 1% had non-cirrhotic portal hypertension, whereas 99% had cirrhotic portal hypertension.

DISCUSSION

Portal hypertension is the rise in Porto-systemic pressure gradient in any portion of the portal venous system. Although portal hypertension can result from pre-hepatic abnormalities (e.g. portal or splenic vein thrombosis), post-hepatic abnormalities (e.g. Budd-Chiari syndrome) or intrahepatic non-cirrhotic causes (e.g. schistosomiasis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome), cirrhosis is by far the most common etiology of portal hypertension.

An HVPG above 5 mmHg defines portal hypertension, however an HVPG of 10 mmHg or greater points towards clinically significant portal hypertension as this pressure gradient predicts clinical course in patients with cirrhosis including development of varices15, clinical decompensation (i.e. development of ascites, variceal hemorrhage and encephalopathy)16, decompensation or death after liver resection, and hepatocellular carcinoma17.

The complications that result directly from portal hypertension are the development of varices and variceal hemorrhage. Esophageal varices are the most frequent types of varices in patients with portal hypertension. Gastric varices although uncommon, can result in significant mortality due to complicated control of acute hemorrhage. Compared to endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) or endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), endoscopic variceal obturation with a tissue adhesive such as N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, or isobutyl-2-cyanoacrylate is more effective for acute fundic gastric variceal bleeding. The results include a better rate of control of initial hemorrhage as well as lower re-bleeding rate18,19. It is therefore important to identify the frequency of patients who have gastric varices due to portal hypertension, since these are the patients who require tissue glue instead of band ligation for prevention as well as control of acute variceal hemorrhage.

Examination of the results of study revealed that the overall frequency of gastric varices was 11%. Interpretation of the results show this much frequency of patients with portal hypertension presenting in outpatient departments have gastric varices.

Variceal hemorrhage is a frequent complication of portal hypertension and chief cause of disability and death in patients with liver cirrhosis. Advanced stage of liver failure, failure to control acute hemorrhage, early rebleeding and markedly elevated portal pressure is associated with poor prognosis4. Variceal hemorrhage is seen in 25 to 30% of patients with cirrhosis and is responsible for 80 to 90% of bleeding episodes in these patients. Combined treatment with vasoactive drugs, prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic techniques is the suggested standard of care for patients with acute variceal bleeding20. However treatment failure occurs in 10 to 15% of patients21. These patients need repeat endoscopic therapy and multiple transfusions. The 6-week mortality with each episode of variceal hemorrhage is about 15 to 20%, ranging from 0% among patients with child class A disease to approximately 30% among patients with Child class C disease22,23.

Gastric varices are less common than esophageal varices and are present in 5%-33% of patients with portal hypertension with a reported incidence of bleeding of about 25% in 2 years, with a higher bleeding incidence for fundal varices24.

CONCLUSION

A large number of patients with portal hypertension have gastric varices. It is recommended that endoscopy be carried out in all patients with identified portal hypertension.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

This study has no conflict of interest to declare by any author.

REFERENCES

1. Bari K, Garcia-Tsao G. Treatment of portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol2012; 18(11): 1166-1175.

2. Arruda SMB, Barreto VST, Amaral FJ. Duplex sonography study in schistosomiasis portal hypertension: characterization of patients with and without a history of variceal bleeding. Arqgastroenterol 2008; 45(1):11-6.

3. Garcia-Pagan JC, Groszmann R, Bosch J. Measurement of portal pressure. In: Weinstein WM, Hawkey CJ, Bosch J, eds. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2005:981-986.

4. Garcia JC, Caca K, Bureau C, Laleman W, Appenrodt B, Luca A, et al. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:2370-9.

5. Suk KT. Hepatic venous pressure gradient: Clinical use in chronic liver disease. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014; 20(1):6-14.

6. Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genesca J, Abraldes JG, Calleja JL, Aracil C, et al. Development of hyperdynamic circulation and response to beta blockers in compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Hepatology, 2016; 63(1):197-206.

7. D'Amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, Bosch J. Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systemic review. Gastroenterology 2006; 131(5): 1611.

8. Gralnek IM, Barkun AN, Bardou M. Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:928-37.

9. Akhtar N, Zuberi BF, Hasan SR, Kumar R, Afsar S. Determination of correlation of adjusted blood requirement index with outcome in patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15(19):2372-2375.

10. LaBrecque D, Khan AG, Sarin SK, LeMair AW. Esophageal varices. WGO Practice guidelines 2014.

11. Liu C, Zhi W, Chang L, Feng C, Qiyang H, Enqiang L, et al. Treatment of gastric varices by endoscopic sclerotherapy using butyl cyanoacrylate: 10 years experience of 635 cases. Chin Med J 2007; 120(23):2081-5.

12. Mumtaz K, Majid S, Shah H, Hameed K, Ahmed A, Hamid S, et al. Prevalence of gastric varices and results of sclerotherapy with N-butyl 2 cyanoacrylate for controlling acute gastric variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13:1247-51.

13. Sarin SK, Negi S. Management of gastric variceal hemorrhage. Indian J Gastroenterol 2006; 25:S25-8.

14. Noophun P, Kongkam P, Gonlachanvit S, Rerknimitr R. Bleeding gastric varices: Results of endoscopic injection with cyanoacrylate at king chulalongkorn memorial hospital. World J gastroenterol 2005; 11(47): 7531-7535.

15. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Planas R, et al. B-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 2254-61.

16. Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G, Grace N, Burroughs A, Planas R, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 481-8.

17. Ripoll C, Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace N, Burroughs A, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts development of hepatocellular carcinoma independently of severity of cirrhosis. J Hepatol2009; 50: 923-8.

18. Tan PC, Hou MC, Lin HC, Liu TT, Lee FY, Chang FY, et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic treatment of acute gastric variceal haemorrhage: n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection versus band ligation. Hepatology. 2006; 43: 690-7.

19. Lo GH, Liang HL, Chen WC, Chen MH, Lai KH, Hsu PI, et al. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus cyanoacrylate injection in the prevention of gastric variceal rebleeding. Endoscopy2007; 39: 679-85.

20. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, et al. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal haemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007; 46:922.

21. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC. Portal hypertension and gastrointestinal bleeding. Semin Liver Dis 2008; 28:3-25.

22. Abraldes JG, Villanueva C, Banares R, Aracil C, Catalina MV, Garci A-Pagan JC, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient and prognosis in patients with acute variceal bleeding treated with pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy. J Hepatol 2008; 48:229-36.

23. Bosch J, Thabut D, Albillos A, Carbonell N, Spicak J, Massard J, et al. Recombinant factor VIIa for variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2008; 47:1604-14.

24. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Prevention and management of Gastroesophageal varices and variceal haemorrhage in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 2086-102.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Article Type:Clinical report
Date:Feb 28, 2017
Words:2568
Previous Article:COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF TOPICAL CYCLOSPORINE WITH FLUROMETHALONE IN TREATMENT OF DRY EYE DISEASE.
Next Article:EFFICACY OF HYPOFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY IN LOCO-REGIONAL TUMOR CONTROL IN BREAST.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters