Printer Friendly


Laboratory examination of scat contents of forest predators such as Pacific Marten (Martes americana caurina; hereafter marten) provides information on diet that is important to understanding habitat relationships for the species and its prey (Cumberland and others 1997; Bull 2000). Food habits of marten in the Pacific states may be more diverse than elsewhere (Zielinski and others 1983; Martin 1994; Bull 2000). For example, in the east-central Cascade Range, Washington, arthropods (bees, ants, wasps, and beetles) occurred most often in marten scats (Newby 1951), whereas in north-eastern Oregon, vole-sized mammals dominated (Bull 2000). To our knowledge, these are the only published studies on the Pacific Marten for these states. We present findings of contents of marten scats as indicators of their feeding habits in a south-central Oregon location and forest type where information has not been previously reported, and compare results with the northeastern (NE) Oregon study (Bull 2000), which paralleled our study.

Our study was located on the Fremont-Winema National Forest, east of the Cascade Range crest northeast of Chemult, Oregon (Jones and others 1996). The approximate Winema center is at latitude 42.929[degrees], longitude -121.153[degrees] (Google Earth imagery date, 31 December 1969, accessed 19 September 2016); general elevation was approximately 1700 m. Forest cover was dominated by climax Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta)-Bitterbrush shrub (Purshia tridentata) forest, and higher hills on that pumice plateau supported Ponderosa Pine (P. ponderosa), Sugar Pine (P. lambertiana), Western White Pine (P. monticola), White Fir (Abies concolor) and Red Fir (A. magnifica) (Franklin and Dyrness 1988). Mean annual temperature at that period (1997) was 5.3[degrees]C ([bar.x] January min. =-11.1[degrees]C, and [bar.x] July max. = 28.2[degrees]C). Mean annual precipitation was 0.68 m with 4.2 m snow accumulation (Raphael and Jones 1997). Salvage logging following beetle damage occurred during the study, with some removal of down wood and snags and a large accumulation of slash piles for a habitat-manipulation study that was not implemented (Jones and others 1996; Katnik and others 1996). The area has been described at multiple scales from remotely-sensed data (Shirk and others 2014).

Each sample contained [less than or equal to]10 scats per collection event, mostly from capture sites, dens, and rest sites discovered during radio-tracking research (Jones and others 1997; Raphael and Jones 1997; Holyan and others 1998; Shirk and others 2014) between January 1993 and September 1998. We used standard methods to process contents and identified items from guard hairs and bones using available keys (Maser and Storm 1970; Brunner and Coman 1974; Korschgen 1980) and reference collections of potential prey. It was not always possible to accurately count the number of items in each sample, so we used frequency of occurrence (FO; the percentage of samples in which an item occurred) to describe composition (Klare and others 2011).

We assigned samples to a season based on collection date: summer, from 21 March to 20 September; winter, from 21 September to 20 March; and unknown. The dates during 5 of the 6 y of our study were comparable to the NE Oregon marten study (summer, 18 April to 14 October; winter, 15 October to 17 April), although our study had 8 additional samples in 1998, 1 y following the NE study. We also fixed 3 microscope slides from a random sample of 45 scats to identify the presence of hypogeous fungi.

We used 95% confidence interval (CI) overlap rules to compare pairs of independent means of scat contents. Rules for P-values are as follows: if CIs touch or very slightly overlap, P [approximately equal to] 0.01; if the gap between arms is approximately 1/3 the length of a single arm, P [approximately equal to] 0.001; and if the gap is larger, P < 0.001. For overlap to about 1/2 the length of an arm, P [approximately equal to] 0.05; so for the area between slight overlap to 1/2 arm length, P [less than or equal to] 0.05 (dimming 2009). For fixed Ns, the error bars are asymmetrical when P is closer to 0 or 1. We used exploratory software for CIs to compute and display proportions (Cumming 2012) and to report them as percentages. Significant results in the text include the CI as a range with the P-value.

We collected 250 scats from 22 females and 31 males, with 97 samples from marten of unknown sex. Overall, 98.0% of scats contained remains from 26 mammal species, followed by arthropods, birds, plant material, and reptiles. In general, we observed no differences in the FOs of items within the 5 groups between summer and winter (Table 1). However, 61.2% of the total scats had collection dates for marked individuals (n = 153), and with this filter, we found seasonal differences in the FO of bird remains between females and males (Fig. 1).

By FO, the majority of scat samples contained vole-sized (CI = 67-78%) and squirrel-sized mammals (41-53%), which were proportionally different (P < 0.01) (Table 1). However, between-season proportions were not different within each size group (Table 1). The FO of Microtus spp. in female marten scats in winter (21.2%, 11-38%) was significantly greater than in male scats (4.9%, 1-16%) (P [approximately equal to] 0.05). Peromyscus spp. FO in male marten scats in summer (24.2%, 13-41%) was greater than in female scats (4.3%, 1-15%) (P < 0.05), and overall, the FO in male samples (17.6%, 11-28%) was greater than in female samples (6.3%, 3-14%) (P [approximately equal to] 0.05).

The FO of both vole- and squirrel-size prey in our study was greater than in the NE Oregon study (vole = 60-66%, P < 0.01; squirrel = 26-31%, P < 0.001) conducted by Bull (2000). Differences in occurrence of vole-sized prey were mainly due to proportions of chipmunks (Neotamias spp.) that were 10 times greater than in the NE Oregon study, and ground squirrels (Spermophilus spp.) in squirrel-sized samples, which were nearly absent in the NE Oregon study. In the NE Oregon study, identifications were mostly undetermined (Table 1). We identified 9 mammalian species in our study scats in addition to those identified in the NE Oregon study, and 2 species found in the NE Oregon study were not found in our scat samples (Table 1).

The FO of Microrus spp. (13-22%) and Myodes spp. (4-10%) voles in our study were less than in the NE Oregon study, where they were the 2 dominant small-bodied mammals (Microtus spp., 25-30%; Myodes spp., 22-27%) (both P < 0.001) (Table 1). In summer in our study, Microtus spp. FO (16-34%) was as high as Neotamias spp. FO (15-33%), but on an annual basis was lower than Neotamias spp. (22-33%) (P [approximately equal to] 0.01) (Table 1).

We did not observe a seasonal shift from small- to larger-bodied small mammals in winter as reported in the NE Oregon study. Such shifts have been hypothesized to synchronize with abundance and availability of prey, to optimize metabolic energy, and to minimize predation risk (Zielinski and others 1983; Zielinski 1988; Drew and Bissonette 1997). Hibernation and snow cover concealing prey, and energy constraints on marten were posited as reasons for the winter shift to larger prey in the NE Oregon study (Bull 2000). The evenness of seasonal occurrence between the small and larger body-size groups in our study may confirm a good year-round availability in the mammalian prey base. Anecdotal reporting from preliminary small mammal live-trapping in our study area noted an "... unusually high abundance of ground squirrels and chipmunks, which may explain the abundance of marten in this atypical habitat" (Katnik and others 1996: 3). The climate is less harsh in winter in our study area than in the NE Oregon study area, likely contributing to an increased availability and vulnerability of hibernating ground squirrels and chipmunks to predation during this season. Chipmunks and ground squirrels hibernating in winter burrows may be vulnerable to marten in a way similar to the hypothesized vulnerability of Tamiasciurus spp. in subnivean middens when resting at night (Zielinski and others 1983; Drew and Bissonette 1997).

Both our study area and the NE Oregon study area sites had relatively low FO of arboreal squirrels in samples (Tamiasciurus spp. and Glaucomys spp., 4-7%) (Table 1). Salvage logging in our study area and partial overstory removals of >80% in NE Oregon likely diminished habitat quality for arboreal squirrels. However, the species-specific relative importance of arboreal squirrels in both studies was also likely confounded by the relatively high proportions of undetermined squirrel species in the samples (Table 1).

Other mammals with high FO that were more frequent in our study than in NE Oregon include Thomymys spp. (7-14% > 2-4%; P < 0.001), owing to the high FO in summer (9-24% > 2-7%; P < 0.01); Peromyscus spp. (11-19% > 6-10%; P < 0.01); and Phenacomys spp. (12-22%), which was not reported from NE Oregon (Table 1).

Birds could not be determined to species from scat remains, but cameras used at marten dens documented 2 sequences of predation on Darkeyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis) (Jones and others 1997). In summer, the FO of birds in male scats (33.3%, 20-50%) was greater than in female scats (10.9%, 5-23%) (P < 0.05), but in winter, this was reversed (F [30.3%, 17-47%] > M [7.3%, 2.5-19%] (P [approximately equal to] 0.01) (Fig. 1). Also, the FO of birds in female scats in winter was greater than in summer (P [approximately equal to] 0.05), and the FO of birds in male scats in winter was less than in summer (P [approximately equal to] 0.01). This seasonal shift may be related to the different activities of female and male marten. In general, marten are focused on birds during the nesting season (Walankiewicz 2002; Weidinger 2009), but marked females in our study were observed rearing young in mostly ground-level dens (Raphael and Jones 1997). In winter, which included pre-denning with more movement by females (including tree searches for den cavities), there may have been increased opportunities for bird encounters.

The arthropod group with the highest FO was coleopterans (beetles; 12%), of which 3.2% were identified as the Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonas ponderosae). We found that 9.2% of samples contained the hymenopteran vespid wasps, yellowjackets (Vespula spp.), and Bald-faced Hornets (Dolichovespula maculata) (Table 1). We also identified Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets, etc.; 4.8%), Diptera (flies; 2.0%), Ixodida (ticks; 0.4%), and Formicidae (ants; 0.4%).

The FO of arthropods in our study (30-42%) was greater than in the NE Oregon study (Bull 2000) (20-25%) (P < 0.001), whereas birds, plant material, and lagomorphs were similar between locations (Table 1). However, the FO of plant material varied seasonally between the 2 studies: in summer, NE Oregon (FO = 23-33%) was greater than in our study (4-16%) (P <0.001); it reversed in winter (our study = 8-22%, NE Oregon = 4-8%; P < 0.01) (Table 1). Note that arthropods in the table are grouped for direct comparison with the table formatted by Bull (2000).

In our study, we reported the 2nd highest FO for insects (arthropods) in the marten diet, comprised primarily of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.), Bald-faced Hornets, and yellow-jackets. Only Newby (1951) reported a higher FO (42.8%) for insects in the diet, and Bull (2000) reported the 3rd highest FO in the NE Oregon study (Table 1). Newby (1951) also reported a FO of 54.7% for arthropods in the summer diet of martens at the eastern Cascades site in Washington (compare to Table 1). Yellowjackets are consumed by marten primarily in the west, where yellowjacket (aerial/ground) and hornet (aerial) nests occur at high frequency, which marten appear to skillfully pilfer (Newby 1951; Bull 2000). Vespid FO was relatively large in our study, and with coleopterans and orthopterans, comprised 24.8% of the identified arthropods. The FO for Mountain Pine Beetles (as well as carpenter ants) was likely greater than we determined, considering the beetle-damaged forest of our study area, but amounts were likely hidden in the 20.0% of samples containing specimens that we could not classify to a lower taxonomic level for more specific identification.

Plant material had relatively low FO as undetermined seeds (7.6%), undetermined plants (1.6%), and lichen (0.4%). Fungi occurred in 53% of the random subsamples. Rhizopogon spp. spores occurred in 47% of those samples, and Gnutieria spp. and Hysterangium spp. were present in 2 samples each. Melanogaster spp., Sclerogaster spp., Cortinariacea (order Agaricales, gilled mushrooms), and order Mucorales (pin molds) each were identified in 1 sample.

Because volumes of plants and insects (arthropods) are small, their occurrence in scats may not necessarily indicate their relative importance, and although mustelids like marten are known to eat plants and fungi (Fogel and Trappe 1978; North and others 1997), their occurrence in scats may also reflect stomach contents of herbivorous prey such as voles, mice, chipmunks, and flying squirrels (Martin 1994; Klare and others 2011). In our study, each type of item was counted only once per sample, which could have underestimated the occurrence and importance of these small items. For example, in Washington, Newby (1951) found that 34.7% of marten scats contained only arthropods, which demonstrated that large volumes were eaten and that they were a main food item.

Compared to 24 marten food studies across North America that we reviewed (Buskirk and Ruggiero 1994; Martin 1994), and the NE Oregon study (Bull 2000), our study reports the highest FO for chipmunks and ground squirrels in marten scats, which we speculate is habitat related. The warm and dry south-central Oregon plateau has an open pine canopy with meadows, scattered brush, and many slash piles that have replaced stumps and fallen tree trunks, which is typical of Yellow-pine Chipmunk (Neotamias amoenus) and ground squirrel habitat. Spermophilus spp. are known to rapidly colonize new clearcuts (or recent burns) often connected by roads, and they burrow under or near a wide variety of natural and human-made structures (Gashwiler 1970; Sutton 1992; Bartels and Thompson 1993). In moist to mesic conifer-dominated closed-canopy forests that are more typical of marten habitat, red-backed voles, as well as Microtus spp. voles are the main marten prey species (Buskirk and Ruggiero 1994; Buskirk and Zielinski 2003; Verts and Carraway 1998). In the western states, Myodes spp. in scats in these forests ranged from 28-42% (Martin 1994), greater than in our samples (Table 1). Arboreal squirrel FOs in these studies were larger than the findings for both Oregon sites. For example, research from Washington, California, and Montana reported the FO of Tamiasciurus between 10 and 38%, and 21% for Glaucomys (Montana) (Marshall 1946 [winter]; Newby 1951 [1 y]; Hargis and McCullough 1984 [winter]). Note that results from referenced studies, unless specified, are relative because occurrence may vary with season and year within a study's duration in relation to cycles of small-mammal populations.

In our study area, slash piles likely lessened logging impacts on ground-level habitat structure and created exceptional hunting opportunities for marten (Lisgo and others 2002; Andruskiw and others 2008). For example, slash piles and windrows on clearcuts enhanced species-specific abundance and persistence, species richness, and increased winter activity of forest-floor small mammals (particularly red-backed voles, Myodes spp.) in British Columbia (Sullivan and others 2012). In our study area, slash piles were the most frequently used structures for marten denning (44% of telemetry locations) and resting (40%), often with females using multiple den sites (Raphael and others 1998). Presumably, slash piles were the main ground structures because removal of snags and large downed woody debris was part of the experimental treatment (Katnik and others 1996). Woody debris (in this case, slash piles) provides visual cues to marten, which enhances predation efficiency (see Andruskiw and others 2008).

Our findings support describing marten as generalist predators (Buskirk and Ruggiero 1994; Martin 1994). The high occurrence of chipmunks and ground squirrels and their relative evenness in seasonal occurrence, as well as the prevalence of vole- and squirrel-sized species groups in general in the diet of marten is novel. Slash piles in quantities greater than those created during operational-scale salvage logging may be a practical and important habitat-management approach for maintaining prey and marten in the south-central Oregon pine forests. For example, before salvage logging, there were about 4.8 larger slash piles/[km.sup.2] and 10.7 smaller piles/[km.sup.2] in the core study area (Jones and Raphael 1990); by the end of the study, there were >1500 slash piles in the study area (Raphael and others 1998), an implied density of >17.6/[km.sup.2]. Slash pile configurations were highly variable and were artificially constructed multi-layered stacks of branches and foliage, logs, ordered log decks for firewood cutting, stumps, and other debris that were [greater than or equal to]4 [m.sup.2] in ground-level surface area (Jones and others 1996; Raphael and Jones 1997). These quantities may be particularly important to chipmunks and ground squirrels, which were staples in the year-round diet of marten. Slash piles may also have allowed for the persistence of Myodes, a genus that requires downed logs, but is often absent in more xeric habitats (Verts and Carraway 1998) such as our study area. As an endnote, we point forest managers to the specific guidelines for woody debris structures (slash piles and windrows) from the landmark experiment in beetle-damaged salvage-logged Lodgepole Pine forests in British Columbia (Sullivan and others 2012).

Acknowledgments.--LLC Jones (lead) and field biologists LA Clark, MH Dennis, LA Fehl-Peterson, JT Forbes, JA Hoylan, LL Irwin, DD Katnik, TL Simpson (national forest liaison), and J. Trappe were primary contributors. CL Sato did the laboratory work and specimen identification. M Parker, M Ben-David and the editor R Hoffman provided thoughtful reviews that greatly improved this work.


ANDRUSKIW M, JM FRYXELL, ID THOMPSON, JA BAKER. 2008. Habitat-mediated variation in predation risk by the American Marten. Ecology 89:2273-2280.

BARTELS MA, THOMPSON DF. 1993. Spermophilus lateralis. Mammalian Species 440:1-8.

BULL EL. 2000. Seasonal and sexual differences in American Marten diet in northeastern Oregon. Northwest Science 74:186-191.

BRUNNER H, COMAN BJ. 1974. The identification of mammalian hair. Hong Kong: Shanghai Printing Press. 91 p.

BUSKIRK SW, RUGGIERO LF. 1994. American Marten. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Buskirk SW, Lyon LJ, Zielinski WJ, editors. The scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores: American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, and Wolverine in the western United States. General Technical Report RM-254. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, p 7-38.

BUSKIRK SW, ZIELINSKI WJ. 2003. Small and mid-sized carnivores. In: Zabel CJ, Anthony RG, editors. Mammal community dynamics management and conservation in the coniferous forests of western North America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 207-249.

CUMBERLAND RE, DEMPSEY JA, FORBES GJ. 1997. Should diet be based on biomass? Importance of larger prey to American Marten. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:1129-1130.

CUMMINC G. 2009. Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine 28:205-220.

CUMMINC G. 2012. Understanding the new statistics. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 519 p.

DREW GS, BISSONETTE JA. 1997. Winter activity patterns of American Martens (Martes americana): Rejection of the hypothesis of thermal-cost minimization. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75:812-816.

FOGEL R, TRAPPE JM. 1978. Fungus consumption (mycophagy) by small mammals. Northwest Science 51:1-31.

FRANKLIN JF, DVRNESS CT. 1988. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. 452 p.

GASHWILER JS. 1970. Plant and mammal changes on a clearcut in west-central Oregon. Ecology 51:1018-1026.

HARGIS CD, McCULLOUGH DR. 1984. Winter diet and habitat selection of marten in Yosemite National Park. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:140-146.

HOLYAN JA, JONES LLC, RAPHAEL MG. 1998. American Marten use of cabins as resting sites in central Oregon. Northwestern Naturalist 79:68-70.

*JONES LLC, RAPHAEL MG. 1990. Marten ecology and management in fragmented habitats of the Pacific Northwest. Olympia, WA: US Department of Ariculture, Forest Service. 44 p. Available from Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512.

*JONES LLC, RAPHAEL MG, IRWIN LL. 1996. Ecology and management of American Marten in a Lodgepole Pine ecosystem in central Oregon. Olympia, WA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 36 p. Available from Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512.

JONES LLC, RAPHAEL MG, FORBES JT, CLARK LA. 1997. Using remotely activated cameras to monitor maternal dens of martens. In: Proulx G, Bryant HN, Woodard PM, editors. Martes: Taxonomy, techniques, and management. Edmonton, AB: The Provincial Museum of Alberta, p 329-349.

*KATNIK DD, RAPHAEL MG, JONES LLC. 1996. Natural history and habitat use by American Marten in a central Oregon Lodgepole Pine ecosystem. Olympia, WA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 4 p. Available from Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512.

KLAKE U, KAMLER JF, MACDONALD DW. 2011. A comparison and critique of different scat-analysis methods for determining carnivore diet. Mammal Review 41:294-312.

KORSCHGEN LJ. 1980. Procedures for food-habits analyses. In: Schemnitz SD, editor. Wildlife techniques manual. Washington, DC: The Wildlife Society, p 113-127.

LISGO KA, BUNNELL FL, HARESTAD. 2002. Summer and fall use of logging residue piles by female Short-tailed Weasels. In: Laudenslayer WF, Shea PJ, Valentine BE, Weatherspoon CP, Lisle TE, technical editors. Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology and management of dead wood in western forests. 2-4 November 1999 Reno, NV. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-181. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, p 319-329.

MARSHALL WH. 1946. Winter food habits of the Pine Marten in Montana. Journal of Mammalogy 27:83-84.

MARTIN SK. 1994. Feeding ecology of American Marten and Fishers. In: Buskirk SW, Harestad AS, Raphael MG, Powell RA, editors. Biology and conservation of Marten, Sables, and Fishers: A new synthesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p 297-315.

MASER C, STORM RM. 1970. A Key to the Microtinae of the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho). Puget Sound Museum of Natural History. 162 P.

NEWSY FE. 1951. Ecology of the marten in the Twin Lakes area, Chelan County, Washington [thesis]. Pullman, WA: State College of Washington (Washington State University). 38 p.

NORTH M, TRAPPE J, FRANKLIN J. 1997. Standing crop and animal consumption of fungal sporocarps in Pacific Northwest forests. Ecology 78:1543-1554.

PATTERSON BD, NORRIS RW. 2016. Towards a uniform nomenclature for ground squirrels: The status of the Holarctic chipmunks. Mammalia 80:241-251.

RAPHAEL MG, JONES LLC. 1997. Characteristics of resting and denning sites of American Marten in central Oregon and western Washington. In: Proulx G, Bryant HN, Woodard PM, editors. Martes: Taxonomy, techniques, and management. Edmonton, AB: The Provincial Museum of Alberta, p 146-165.

*RAPHAEL MG, JONES LLC, CLARK L, DENNIS M, HOYLAN J, IRWIN, L. 1998. Natural history and habitat use by American Marten in a central Oregon Lodgepole Pine ecosystem. Olympia, WA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2 p. Available from Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512.

SHIRK AL, RAPHAEL MG, CUSHMAN SA. 2014. Spatiotemporal variation in resource selection: Insights from the American Marten (Martes americana). Ecological Applications 24:1434-1444.

SULLIVAN TP, SULLIVAN DS, LINDGREN PMF, RANSOME B. 2012. If we build habitat, will they come? Woody debris structures and conservation of forest mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 93:1456-1468.

SUTTON DA. 1992. Tamias amoenus. Mammalian Species 390:1-8.

VERTS BJ, CARRAWAY LN. 1998. Land mammals of Oregon. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 668 p.

WALANKIEWICZ W. 2002. Breeding losses in the Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicllis) caused by nest predators in the Bialowieza National Park (Poland). Acta Ornithologica 37:21-26.

WEIDINGER K. 2009. Nest predators of woodland open-nesting songbirds in central Europe. Ibis 151:352-360.

ZIHLINSKI WJ. 1988. The influence of daily variation in foraging cost on the activity of small carnivores. Animal Behavior 36:239-249.

ZIELINSKI WJ, SPENCER WD, BARRETT RH. 1983. Relationships between food habits and activity patterns of Pine Martens. Journal of Mammalogy 64:387-396.

(*) Unpublished

USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625 93rd Avenue, SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 (RJW, MGR: emeritus); Submitted 25 October 2016, accepted 25 April 2017. Corresponding Editor: Michael Parker.
TABLE 1. Frequency of occurrence (%) of items found in scat samples
from radio-collared Pacific Marten in south-central (SC, this study)
and northeastern Oregon (NE, Bull 2000). This table is closely
formatted after Bull (2000) to facilitate direct comparisons.

                                                       Summer    Winter
                                                     SC     NE    SC

 Shrew Sorex spp. (2)                               1.1     4.9   1.1
 Fossorial mammal                                   1.1       -   3.2
 Bat Myotis spp.                                    -         -     -
 Chipmunk Neotamias spp. (4)                       22.7     6.5  23.2
 N. Pocket Gopher Thomymys talpoides               14.8     3.4   5.3
 Great Basin Pocket Mouse Perognathus parvus        2.3       -     -
 Western Harvest Movise Reithrodontomys megalotis   1.1       -     -
 Deer Mouse Peromyscus spp.                        12.5    10.4  12.6
 Red-backed Vole Myodes spp. (5)                    9.1    30.3   6.3
 Heather Vole Phenacomys intermedins               11.4       -  11.6
 Vole Microtus spp.                                23.9    50.2  15.8
 Undetermined vole (microtine)                      4.5    12.4  14.7
 Sagebrush Vole Lemmiscus curtatus                  -         -   1.1
 Common Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus                  1.1       -     -
 W. Jumping Mouse Zapus princeps                    2.3       -     -
 Undetermined cricetid                              2.3       -   4.2
 Total vole-sized prey                             67.0    83.1  70.5
 Undetermined squirrel                             10.2    11.1  15.8
 N. Hying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus               3.4     2.6   2.1
 Squirrels Tamiasciurus spp. (6)                    1.1     2.9   2.1
 Bushy-tailed Woodrat Neotoma cinerea               -       1.3   1.1
 Ground Squirrel Spermophilus spp. (7)             28.4       -  20.0
 Weasel Mustek spp.                                 1.1     0.7   1.1
 Total squirrel-sized prey                         43.2    18.6  41.1
 Undetermined rodent                               15.9       -  14.7
 Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana              1.1       -     -
 American Badger Taxidea taxus                      -         -   1.1
 Mountain Cottontail Sylvilagus nuttallii           -         -     -
 Undetermined Lepus spp. (8)                        -       2.2   2.1
 Undetermined lagomorph                             2.3       -   1.1
 Total hares and rabbits                            2.3     2.2   3.2
 Undetermined cervid (9)                            5.7       -   5.3
 Porcupine Erethizon darsatum                       -       0.3     -
 Domestic cattle                                    1.1       -     -
Birds                                              18.2    15.3  16.8
 Garter Snake Thamnophis spp.                       1.1       -   1.1
FISH                                                -         -     -
Arthropods/ Insects
 Wasps Vespidae                                    12.5    24.9   9.5
 Ants Formicidae                                    -       4.2     -
 Other arthropods/insects'"                        31.8    11.1  22.1
 Total arthropods/insects                          33.0    31.3  29.5
Plant Material                                      8.0    27.5  13.7
Total samples                                      88      307   95

                                                 Winter   All year (1)
                                                    NE    SC   NE

 Shrew Sorex spp. (2)                               6.4   1.2   4.7
 Fossorial mammal                                  0.43   1.6  0.23
 Bat Myotis spp.                                    0.2     -   0.1
 Chipmunk Neotamias spp. (4)                        0.6  27.6   2.7
 N. Pocket Gopher Thomymys talpoides                2.0  10.0   2.6
 Great Basin Pocket Mouse Perognathus parvus          -   1.2     -
 Western Harvest Movise Reithrodontomys megalotis     -   0.4     -
 Deer Mouse Peromyscus spp.                         8.4  14.4   7.8
 Red-backed Vole Myodes spp. (5)                   19.4   6.0  24.6
 Heather Vole Phenacomys intermedins                  -  16.4     -
 Vole Microtus spp.                                 4.6  16.8  27.4
 Undetermined vole (microtine)                     11.0  11.2  12.7
 Sagebrush Vole Lemmiscus curtatus                    -   0.4     -
 Common Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus                    -   0.4     -
 W. Jumping Mouse Zapus princeps                      -   0.8     -
 Undetermined cricetid                                -   2.8     -
 Total vole-sized prey                             46.1  72.4  62.7
 Undetermined squirrel                             24.4  13.6  17.3
 N. Hying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus               7.2   2.0   4.3
 Squirrels Tamiasciurus spp. (6)                    3.0   2.4   3.3
 Bushy-tailed Woodrat Neotoma cinerea               4.0   0.4   2.5
 Ground Squirrel Spermophilus spp. (7)              0.2  28.0   0.1
 Weasel Mustek spp.                                 1.0   0.8   0.8
 Total squirrel-sized prey                         39.7  47.2  28.2
 Undetermined rodent                                  -  18.8     -
 Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana                -   0.4     -
 American Badger Taxidea taxus                        -   0.4     -
 Mountain Cottontail Sylvilagus nuttallii           1.8     -   0.9
 Undetermined Lepus spp. (8)                        1.2   0.8   1.4
 Undetermined lagomorph                               -   1.2   0.1
 Total hares and rabbits                            3.0   2.0   2.4
 Undetermined cervid (9)                            2.6   4.4   2.0
 Porcupine Erethizon darsatum                         -     -   0.2
 Domestic cattle                                      -   0.4     -
Birds                                              19.8  23.2  19.5
 Garter Snake Thamnophis spp.                         -   0.2     -
FISH                                                0.4     -   0.2
Arthropods/ Insects
 Wasps Vespidae                                     7.6   9.2  15.6
 Ants Formicidae                                    3.8   0.4   3.9
 Other arthropods/insects'"                         0.6  32.4   7.8
 Total arthropods/insects                          15.6  36.0  22.4
Plant Material                                      5.2   9.2  13.3
Total samples                                      501    250  1014

(1) Includes samples with collection dates not known.
(2) Tn SC, species--palustris in summer and winter, and monticolus in
all year.
(3) Coast Mole (Scapanus orarius).
(4) In SC, most if not all were N. amoenus (J. A. Allen, 1890),
Yellow-pine species (see Patterson and Morris 2016).
(5) Species californcus in SC and gapperi in NE.
(6) Species hudsonicus (Red) in NE and douglasii (Douglas') in SC.
(7) In SC, includes Golden-mantled species lateralis, and Belding's,
species beldingi.
(8) In both locations, species = americanus (Snowshoe Hare), and in SC
= townsendii (White-tailed Jaekrabbit).
(9) In SC Elk, Cervus elaphus; and Mule or Black-tailed Deer,
Odocoileus hemionus, identified.
(10) All other arthropods not in the above 2 categories include order
Coleoptera 12.0%; Orthoptera 4.8%; Diptera 2.0%; and Ixodida 0.4%.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Society for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Wilk, Randall J.; Raphael, Martin G.
Publication:Northwestern Naturalist: A Journal of Vertebrate Biology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 22, 2017

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters