Printer Friendly

FEDERAL COURT ENDS SEAGATE SECURITIES LITIGATION; Summary Judgment Cites No Evidence of Fraud.

SCOTTS VALLEY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 10, 1995-- Seagate Technology is pleased to announce that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants in a securities litigation entitled "In re Seagate Technology II Securities Litigation," dismissing with prejudice all of plaintiffs' allegations.

The class action litigation which had been pending since 1988, alleged violations of the federal securities laws by Seagate and several of its current and former officers and directors with respect to the period from April 13, 1988 to July 18, 1988. U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled that summary judgement was proper because, despite protracted litigation and extensive discovery, "... for a number of reasons...plaintiffs have failed to substantiate (their) claims with sufficient evidence..." "...and of fraud there is simply no proof..."

Seagate, which was scheduled to go to trial on March 15, 1995, has vigorously defended this action over the past six years. "This is a broad sweeping victory for Seagate, its directors and officers," said Alan Shugart, company president and CEO. "While the final outcome is gratifying, it is important to note that it has taken many years, a tremendous amount of mindshare, and millions of dollars to dispose of this unfounded lawsuit. This case exemplifies the need for legislative reform to rid America's high technology industry of the burden of meritless securities litigation with impedes this nation's competitive position and does a grave disservice to the company's shareholders."

Seagate Technology is a data technology company that provides products for storing, managing and accessing digital information on the world's computer and data communications systems. Seagate's stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "SEG."

CONTACT: Seagate Technology, Scotts Valley

Julie A. Still, 408/438-6550, Media Relations

Nancy Hamm, 408/438-6550, Investor Relations
COPYRIGHT 1995 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Feb 10, 1995
Words:305
Previous Article:Cubic Field Services wins three contracts totaling $9.3 million for Navy simulator O&M services.
Next Article:ROBERT C. SLEDD ELECTED CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER; C. MICHAEL GRAY ELECTED PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER; OTHER EXECUTIVE...
Topics:


Related Articles
Client's alleged negligence does not relieve auditors' responsibilities.
Privilege doesn't apply to litigation support services.
Auditors granted summary judgment in securities case.
Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions.
The after-acquired evidence doctrine: an insidious defense.
Streamlining EPA's NPDES permit program with administrative summary judgment: Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority v. Environmental Protection...
Trial by summary judgment? Erosion of the Seventh Amendment.
Tort reform revolution.
O'Connor's Federal Rules: Civil Trials.
Supreme Court opens door to RICO suits against health insurers.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters