FDA advisory panel supports five-in-one childhood vaccine.
The panel voted unanimously to support the safety of Sanofi-Pasteur's Pentacel, which has been licensed in Canada since 1997 and used exclusively there since 1998, with over 12 million doses distributed. It also is used in several European countries.
All 15 of the panel's permanent and temporary voting members also endorsed the efficacy of the vaccine's diphtheria, tetanus, and polio components. However, a few panelists expressed concern about its protection against pertussis and Hib, based on conflicting study findings regarding noninferiority of Pentacel compared with currently licensed vaccines or their equivalents. But even the members who voiced those concerns still generally supported the vaccine's licensure, with the caveat that ongoing disease surveillance continues and that extra efforts are made to monitor Hib rates in high-risk populations.
"For the [Hib] component, I don't feel I have adequate data," said biostatistician Steven Self, Ph.D. But, he later stated, "On balance, yes, the vaccine has public health benefit."
Indeed, several panel members noted that a small diminution in immunogenicity of one vaccine component might well be counterbalanced by improved overall vaccine coverage rates resulting from the reduction in injections. Compared with giving DTaP IPV, and Hib separately, use of Pentacel in children at 2, 4, 6, and 15-18 months of age would reduce the total required number of shots in infants and toddlers by seven, said Dr. David Greenberg, Sanofi-Pasteur's director of scientific and medical affairs.
Panel member Dr. John Modlin, professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, pointed out another potential advantage to Pentacel: It would avoid the "conundrum" regarding hepatitis B vaccine, which is included in the currently licensed combination vaccines Comvax (Hib and hepatitis B) and Pediarix (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and polio). Since those combinations can't be given prior to 2 months of age, infants who receive their first dose of hepatitis B vaccine at birth end up with an extra dose of hepatitis B vaccine by the time they finish the primary series.
Although safe, this is a cost issue in some settings and has been cited as a disincentive to giving the first hepatitis B dose at birth, a practice that has been endorsed by multiple advisory bodies. "Introducing this vaccine would add versatility," Dr. Modlin, former chair of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevenrion's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, said in an interview.
Sanofi-Pasteur's U.S. licensure application was based on data from five clinical studies involving a total of 7,146 Pentacel recipients. Safety and immunogenicity were examined in four studies, and one additional study examined immunogenicity compared with the company's currently licensed Daptacel (DTaP) vaccine. Two of the studies examined the concomitant use of Pentacel with Prevnar for the infant series, and with Prevnar, measles-mumps-rubella, and varicella vaccines at 15-18 months.
Safety data, presented by Dr. Luc Kuykens, Sanofi-Pasteur's vice president for regulatory affairs, showed no unexpected adverse events.
The FDA's safety review of Pentacel, presented by Dr. Karen Farizo, also did not detect any unexpected problems.
However, FDA reviewer Theresa Finn, Ph.D., did identify two "concerns" with regard to Pentacel's immunogenicity, noting that the criteria for "noninferiority" were not met for the Hib and pertussis components in some of the studies.
In response to Dr. Finn's analysis of the pertussis data, Dr. Michael Decker, Sanofi-Pasteur's vice president of scientific and medical affairs, noted that a pertussis vaccine's ability to produce immune responses to individual pertussis antigens has been shown not to correlate with degree of protection, and that Pentacel's overall protection against pertussis is comparable to currently used vaccines. As for Hib, only one of two studies had not demonstrated noninferiority. Moreover, the comparator in the former study was not a U.S.-licensed product, he explained.
In an interview following the hearing, Dr. Decker noted that only about half of U.S. physicians are using the currently available combination vaccines Comvax and Pediarix for routine infant immunization, while the other half still use the separate ones. "That tells you physicians are not fully happy with their choices."
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Tucker, Miriam E.|
|Publication:||Family Practice News|
|Date:||Feb 15, 2007|
|Previous Article:||New drug labels highlight pediatric information.|
|Next Article:||Herceptin too costly for many patients.|