Printer Friendly

FACTORS AFFECTING PRE-HARVEST SPROUTING RESISTANCE IN WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.): A REVIEW.

Byline: X. Gao, C. H. Hu, H. Z. Li, Y. J. Yao, M. Meng, J. Dong, W. C. Zhao, Q. J. Chen and X. Y. Li

ABSTRACT

Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) is one of the most important factors to affect the yield and quality of crops worldwide especially in wet harvest period. Breeding PHS-resistant cultivars has important implications to improve the wheat quality and production. The PHS is determined by environmental conditions, inner factors and interaction between these factors. We here reviewed recent advances influencing factors of PHS, including seed dormancy, seed coat permeability and color, a-amylase activities, endogenous hormones levels, genes and QTLs. The present article will provide basic materials for mining new genes and developing new molecular makers to improve the tolerance of PHS in wheat as well as increase wheat production.

Key words: wheat, pre-harvest sprouting (PHS), influencing factors, review, breeding.

INTRODUCTION

Continuous rains after seed maturity may induce the grain sprouting when it is still on the ear before harvest (Groos et al., 2002). The pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) has been recognized one of the main factors that decreases the yield and quality of crops worldwide especially in wet harvest period. The tolerance of PHS could be induced by environmental conditions, genotypes, quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and the interaction between these factors (Flintham, 2000; Mares et al., 2005). Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), one of the world's largest food crops, is mainly planted in the north latitude 67 degrees to the south latitude 45 degrees. Generally, the seeds tend to be dormant in low temperature and long photoperiod, but sometimes the low temperature and high moisture would break dormancy and promote the seed sprouting (Argel et al., 1983; Ceccato et al., 2011).

Temperature and moisture are the main environmental factors those affect PHS especially during the late maturity stage of wheat (Hilhorst,1995; Yanagisawa et al., 2005; Gao et al., 2006). However, the influence of environmental conditions to PHS is very small usually less than 6% (Biddulph et al., 2008).

The major factors beside environment conditions affecting the tolerance to PHS are seed dormancy, seed coat permeability and color, a-amylase activities, endogenous hormones levels, genes and QTLs. Dormancy was regarded as the primary inner factor which leaded to the wheat resistance to PHS (Lan et al.,2005; Lin et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2011).

The seed coat permeability is the first protecting wall which could increase the wheat PHS tolerance. The seed coat color also plays an important role in PHS. Generally, white wheat varieties have higher germination rates than the red 1 These authors contributed equally to this work. ones (He et al., 2000). The a-amylase is also regarded as one of the factors that affect wheat germination rate, cold tolerance and production. Some other endogenous factors like gibberellic acid (GA), abscisic acid (ABA) and indole acetic acid (IAA) could also affect PHS through all kinds of ways.

PHS is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes. Viviparous-1(Vp-1) has been identified as the main gene that regulated seed germination and dormancy. Some other genes were also regarded to participate in embryos maturing, seed dormancy and germination through network regulation with Vp-1 to control PHS. QTLs for dormancy and PHS were found in different materials through molecular markers. They were located on almost each chromosome (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A,3B, 3D, 4A, 4B, 5B, 5D, 6A, 6B, 6D, 7A, 7B and 7D) in wheat (Flintham et al., 2000; Kato et al., 2001; Flintham et al., 2002; Groos et al., 2002; Osa et al., 2003; Kulwal et al., 2005; Lohwasser et al., 2005; Mori et al., 2005; Kottearachchi et al., 2006; Ogbonnaya et al., 2008; Ren et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2009; Munkvold et al., 2009; Fofana et al., 2009; Mohan et al., 2009; Mares et al.,2009; Zhu et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011;Knox et al.,2012).

To avoid the grain sprouting on the ear and increase wheat production especially in wet harvest period, many studies were focused on the factors affecting PHS in the last decade. Here, we reviewed these new advances as influencing factors to wheat PHS, including seed dormancy, seed coat permeability and color, a-amylase activities, endogenous hormones levels, genes and QTLs.

Seed dormancy: Different wheat varieties have various period of dormancy. The varieties having shorter period of dormancy would easily germinate before harvest under continuous raining conditions after seed maturation. For seed development, the dormancy capacity could be reduced with the mature of seed, but the ability to germinate could be formed at the fifth day after flowering and reach the peak after the seed physiological maturity (Gao et al., 2006). Different dormant levels could be determined by varied seed endogenous inhibitors, which usually affect seed dormancy by complicatedly interacting with each other (McCrate et al., 1982). The dormancy was also partially caused by high level of phenolic compounds in seeds through inhibiting the cell division. Most of the phenolic compounds existed as soluble ester, such as caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and sinapic acids (Weidner et al., 1999).

For seed development, the free phenolic compounds usually exist mainly at the early stage of seed development when the germination rate is low. At this point, the concentration of phenolic compounds significantly varied in different kinds of PHS resistant cultivars. The quantity of phenolic compounds was identified to present a negative relationship with the PHS tolerance (Weidner et al.,2002). Therefore, the relationship between seed dormancy and germination was revealed as varieties with stronger seed dormancy not prone to germinate before harvest and with stronger resistant to PHS.

Seed coat: Seed coat is the first protecting wall which could prevent water absorbed into seed to increase the PHS tolerance. The external water especially the rains once imbibed into the epidermic cells of seed, the a- amylase will be activated in the aleuronic layer and then the seeds will be germinated. Therefore, the seed coat especially the epidermic cells are very important for the tolerance to PHS. Once the epidermic cells of the seed coat arranged very loosely, the varieties will be very susceptible to PHS. On the contrary, the seeds of the PHS resistant varieties always have tightly arranged epidermal cells which could form a wall against absorbing water. (He et al., 2000; Cai and Chen, 2008; Wang et al., 2008). Beside the epidermal cells, an enzymatic oxidation of phenolic compounds was predicted to decrease the seed coat permeable against water and increase the PHS tolerance (Debeaujon et al., 2000).

Generally, the PHS resistant varieties usually have voidless glumes and high level of lixivium of seed coat, which could prevent the embryos from germination in case of continuous raining after seed maturation before harvest.

The influences of seed color on dormancy and germination were indentified though creating recessive mutant Arabidopsis white seeds. The dormancy could be broken by cold treatment with most examined white mutants' seeds' dormancy reduced and germination easily (Debeaujon et al., 2000; Toradal and Amano,2002). The color of seed coat has also been found as another influential factor to the tolerance of PHS in wheat. Generally, the white wheat varieties have a higher germination rate than the red ones (He et al., 2000).This may be caused by different anthocyanin amounts of seed color between two wheat varieties. The deficiency of oligo proanthocyanidin in seed coat especially of the white wheat was found to absorb water fast and caused high germination rate of seeds (Wu et al., 1996).

The red wheat varieties were tolerance to PHS, but the white ones with higher quality were planted on larger areas than the red ones, which may be better valued and have great demand especially in Asia. Fortunately, the color of seed coat is determined by R gene and could transfer to the offspring. Therefore, the tolerance of PHS could be improved in white wheat through crossed with the red wheat varieties. Their offspring resistance to PHS of the self-crossed hybrids after 4-5 generations could be detected as strong as the red seed donor parent (DE PAUW and McCAIG, 1983; Groos et al., 2002). The white wheat varieties with high quality and production could be improved the PHS tolerance and planted in the wet harvest period.

a-Amylase activity: The a-amylase widely exists and participates in many physiology processes in plants, which could hydrolyze with a-1.4-glycosidic bond in the saccharides. The expression of a-amylase was involved in plant metabolism and could affect the germination rate, cold tolerance and production of seed (Khursheed and Rogers, 1988; Gubler and Jacobsen, 1992; Sogaard et al.,1993; Autio et al., 2001; Masojc and Milczarski, 2009). The relationship between a-amylase activity and PHS resistance was deemed to be very remarkable (Wu et al.,2002). This may be due to activity of a-amylase that would increase quickly once absorbed enough water and then promoted the seed sprouting (Wang et al., 2008). The activity of a-amylase was also found to have a significant difference between the resistant and sensitive varieties to PHS in wheat (Wang et al., 2008).

Three isozymes of a-amylase in wheat have been identified affecting PHS, namely malt-a-amylase (a-amylase-1) located on homologous chromosomes 6, green-a-amylase (a-amylase-2) located on homologous chromosomes 7 and a-amylase-3 (Gale and Ainsworth, 1984). The expression level of a-amylase-1 and a-amylase-2 could be regulated by GA3 (Marchylo et al., 1983). The activity of a-amylase-1 was deemed to correlate with the degree of seed dormancy, which accounted for 84% of seed germination (Gale and Ainsworth, 1984). Besides the variation of a-amylase, the a-amylase/subtilisin inhibitors (ASI) in wheat, barley, rice and rye were indentified via restraining the activity of a-amylase to restrain the seeds germination (Mundy et al., 1984; Henry et al., 1992). Ten ASI isomerides were found through isoelectric focusing electrophoresis and monoclonal antibody immune imprinting (Macgregor et al., 1988; Masojc et al., 1993).

The activity of a-amylase could be reduced by the combing complex of ASI and a-amylase-1 to increase the variety's tolerance to PHS (Yuan et al., 2005). However, the mechanism of a-amylase regulating varieties tolerance to PHS still needs to be discussed, since the activity and quantity of a-amylase certainly increased after seed sprouting and very low in the dormant seed.

Growth hormones: The growth hormones, such as GA, ABA and IAA, affected wheat varieties tolerance to PHS through inducing or delaying seed dormancy and germination (Wickham et al., 1984; Weidner et al., 2002; Cai and Chen, 2008). Many studies have been focused to explain the relationship between them and indentified the genes involved them. The GA has been regarded to take part in promoting the seed sprouting. The ABA is one of the most important hormones regulating the development of plants and promoting the seed sprouting through promoting the ecclasis of separation layer and the maturation of embryo (Chen et al., 1999; Xia et al.,2000). It has been confirmed that there was a completely opposite relationship between the expression of GA and ABA.

Various mutants have been used to analyze the regulation process of the GA, ABA and IAA to seed dormancy and germination. The GA mutants failed to germinate and formed physically abnormal seed (Mitsunaga et al., 1994; Steber et al., 1998). The level of GA has been identified as a key determinant of seed germination, and could soften the tissue around the embryo to promote the embryo development by breaking the limitation of glume tenacity (McCrate et al., 1982). The GA could break seed dormancy by counterbalancing the primal endogenous inhibitors and promote seed germination (Wickham et al., 1984; Gashi et al., 2012). It also could induce the a-amylase hydrolyzing starch in endosperm and seed germination through regulating the expression of a-amylase synthetic related genes. The level of ABA could increase quickly to be 2.5-fold in dormant seeds but with no changes in the non-dormant ones (Ried and Walker-Simmons, 1990).

The expression of ABA-response genes represented a long period delayed in the hydrated dormant seeds (Morris et al.,1991).

Lots of genes have been indentified in regulating the expression of GA, ABA and IAA, which have been found to participate in regulating seed dormancy and germination. The RGL2 and ABI5 could regulate the expression of ABA and GA (Piskurewicz et al., 2008). Some dwarf genes participated in regulating seed dormancy and germination in GA insensitive materials (Mitsunaga et al., 1994). One of the Rht alleles, named Rht3, was found to increase the varieties tolerance to PHS tolerance through reducing the amount of late maturity a- amylase (Flintham and Gale, 1982; Mrva and Mares,1996; Wan et al., 2001). The activity of GA was also could be up-regulated by fusca3 (fus3) and leafy cotyledon 2 (lec2) which led to germinate before maturity of Arabidopsis seed (Curaba et al., 2004; Lu et al., 2010).

Transcription factors interacted with ABA mainly contained B3 domain or ring finger domain such as AFL, VAL, DESPIERTO, ATHB20 and ABA insensitive protein 2 (AIP2), which directly regulated seed dormancy. The sensitivity to ABA and the expression of ABI3 could be down-regulated by DESPIERTO (the mutant completely lost the ability of dormancy) and up-regulated by ATHB20 to promote seed dormancy of plant (Barrero et al., 2010). The development and maturation of seeds could be modulated by ABI3 through binding AtGA3ox2 promoter with the B1 and B3 domain of ABI3 (Monke et al., 2004). The FUS3, LEC2, and ABI3 were also indentified to cooperate with each other and regulated the sensitivity to ABA during seed development (Nambara et al., 2000). The FUS3 and LEC2 could participate in regulating the abundance of ABA at the early stage of seed maturation (Nambara et al., 2000).

The ABA was mainly regarded to regulate the germination pathways but not responsible for the loss of seed dormancy (Jacobsen et al., 2002). However, the level of ABA was significantly different in PHS resistant varieties compared with in PHS susceptible strains. Therefore, the tolerance to PHS would be improved in the future through spraying growth hormones with more and more genes identified to regulate the expression of growth hormones especially for the GA, ABA and IAA.

Controlled genes of PHS resistant: The dormancy of seeds and resistant to PHS were controlled by genotypes, environments and the interaction between these factors (Marzougui et al., 2012). During kernel development, the Vp-1 gene expressed in cytoplasm after flowering regulated seed dormancy at the transcriptional level, promoted the seed maturation and repressed the expression of germination related genes (Hoecker et al.,1995; Paek et al., 1998; Wilkinson et al., 2002). There were multiple allelic variation of Vp-1 gene in different cereal crops, but the predicted protein of Vp-1 was conserved with four DNA binding regions A1, B1, B2, and B3 (Nakamura and Toyama, 2001).

Three alleles Vp-1A, Vp-1B, Vp-1D of Vp-1, located on 3A, 3B and 3D homologous chromosomes in wheat, respectively, have been indentified (Yang et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2010).

Many studies also focused on the allele's variation of Vp-1 to explain how Vp-1 regulated the tolerance to PHS. Six alleles of Vp-1A, namelyVp-1Aa, Vp-1Ab, Vp-1Ac, Vp-1Ad, Vp-1Ae and Vp-1Af, were discovered in 81 wheat cultivars and advanced lines (Chang et al., 2010). Six alleles of Vp-1B termed Vp-1Ba,Vp-1Bb, Vp-1Bc, Vp-1Bd, Vp-1Be and Vp-1Bf were also found in wheat (Yang et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2010; Divashuk et al., 2012). However, no alleles of Vp-1D were found in wheat. The wheat variations with alleles of Vp-1Ab and Vp-1Ad were regarded to have low germination index (GI) and strong PHS tolerance (Chang et al., 2010). However, the wheat variations with the allele Vp-1Ba have higher GI and more sensitive to PHS than the other five ones, which even positively affected on the reduction of germination rate (Yang et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2010; Divashuk et al., 2012).

And many researches also studied the expression level of Vp-1, which increased with the growth of caryopsis and reached highest at 40 days after flowering (McKibbin et al., 2002; Wilkinson et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2007). The allele of Vp-1B was more highly expressed than Vp-1A and Vp-1D during the seed development period in wheat (McKibbin et al., 2002; Wilkinson et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2007). The alternative splicing resulted in different tolerance and sensitivity to PHS, indentified at 35 days after flowering (McKibbin et al., 2002; Wilkinson et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2007).Only the correctly spliced Vp-1 gene could encode the complete Vp-1 protein.

The Vp-1gene was also found to be regulated by some other genes participated in embryos maturing, seed dormancy and germination. They controlled PHS through network regulation. For example, the LEC1, ABI3 and FUS3 belonged to the members of B3 transcription factors family were involved into embryos maturing and seed germination (Meinke et al., 1994; Suzuki et al.,2007; Angeles-Nunez and Tiessen, 2011). The ABRE (ABA responding element), DREB (dehydration responsive element binding protein), MYB (v-myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog) and GARE (GA responding element), four elements predicted in the Vp-1B promoter sequence, were involved in regulating seed dormancy and germination (Sun et al., 2011). The genetic mechanisms of the tolerance to PHS of wheat varieties would be revealed though more and more genes related to PHS indentified in further studies.

QTLS related to PHS resistant: The genetics of PHS resistant controlled by both additive and epistatic effects were easily affected by environment. However, the varieties resistant to PHS were regarded not significantly associated with environment by analyzing the interaction and contribution of main effect QTL and environmental effect QTL to PHS (Mohan et al., 2009). QTLs controlled the PHS were indentified to locate on almost each chromosome of wheat (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3D,4A, 4B, 5B, 5D, 6A, 6B, 6D, 7A, 7B and 7D) (Table 1) (Flintham et al., 2000; Kato et al., 2001; Flintham et al.,2002; Groos et al., 2002; Osa et al., 2003; Kulwal et al.,2005; Lohwasser et al., 2005; Mori et al., 2005; Kottearachchi et al., 2006; Ogbonnaya et al., 2008; Ren et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2009; Munkvold et al., 2009; Fofana et al., 2009; Mohan et al., 2009; Mares et al.,2009; Chao et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2010; Zhang et al.,2011; Knox et al., 2011).

Some QTLs were associated with the activity of a-amylaselase in rye and barley (Masojc' and Milczarski, 2009). The explanation and interacting genes of different QTLs controlled the PHS resistant were different. QTLs located on chromosome 4A could interact with red seed (R) gene to affect the tolerance of PHS (Fofana et al., 2009). However, a QTL located on chromosome 5D independently from R gene has also been identified for the tolerance of PHS in wheat (Fofana et al., 2009). Although the PHS is quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes and QTLs, a major QTL controlled over 40% of phenotypic variation of PHS resistant in wheat has been indentified on chromosome 4A (Mares et al., 2005; Torada et al., 2005; Ogbonnaya et al., 2008).

Different QTLs on the same chromosome were identified through multiple materials with molecular markers in wheat. Although several QTLs have already been identified, it will take a long time to apply them to molecular marker assisted selection (MAS) for wheat breeding.

Molecular makers for PHS resistant: Nowadays, MAS, the use of genetic markers, could facilitate the identification of favorable (or deleterious) alleles in a collection of diverse genotypes (Lazo et al., 2004). MAS could be used in the indirect selection of the objective trait, with labor-and time-saving (Anjali et al., 2007). The genetic markers were developed mainly on morphology, cytology, protein and DNA composition. Among them, the first three markers, mainly based on the consequence of gene expression, are the indirect reflection of gene. But DNA markers could directly reflect the information of genetic variation at molecular level.

The Vp-1 gene- specific STS marker of Vp1B3 and MST101, SSR markers of Vp1-b2, Xgwm937, Xgwm894 and Xgwm15, STMS markers of Xwmc468, Xgwm397 and wmc104have been developed and used to identify PHS resistant in different cultivars, and analyze the allelic variations of Vp-1 (Yang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Ogbonnaya et al., 2008; Xia et al., 2009; Guo et al., 2009; Miao et al.,2011; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2010; Yang et al.,2011). The makers of Xgwm937 and Xgwm894 were indentified to be significantly associated with PHS resistance and could be utilized in wheat molecular breeding to improve the PHS resistance (Ogbonnaya et al., 2008). With more genes related to the tolerance of PHS identified, more and more markers especially the functional markers associated with PHS resistance would be developed and utilized in wheat molecular breeding to improve the varieties PHS resistance.

Prospect and conclusion: PHS-resistant cultivars are highly desirable in wheat growing areas where long periods of wet weather occur frequently during harvest. However, only a small number of PHS-resistant cultivars have been used in the field, and the grain quality of these cultivars remained to be improved. Studying the effect of factors to PHS is essential to improve the PHS-resistance in wheat. Besides, selecting and mining new materials also could help breeding PHS-resistant varieties. For example, RSP (Triticum turgidum-Aegilops tauschii) with extreme PHS resistance is the artificial synthetic hexaploid wheat crossed between Aegilops tauschii Cosson and tetraploid wheat (T. turgidum L.) (Lan et al.,2005). With the deepening research on PHS, varieties with PHS resistance, high quality and yield, and high good comprehensive traits will be bred and used in the future crop breeding program.

Acknowledgement: This work is supported, in part, by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31101138), Special Funds for Basic Research (QN2012003) and the Special Funds for Talents in Northwest A and F University (2010BSJJ033).

REFERENCES

Angeles-Nunez, J. G., and A. Tiessen (2011). Mutation of the transcription factor LEAFY COTYLEDON 2 alters the chemical composition of Arabidopsis seeds, decreasing oil and protein content, while maintaining high levels of starch and sucrose in mature seeds. J. Plant Physiol. 168: 1891-1900.

Argel, P. J., and L. R. Humphreys (1983). Environmental effects on seed development and hardseededness in Stylosanthes hamata cv. Verano. I. Temperature. Aust. J. Agric. Res.34: 261-270.

Anjali S. Iyer-Pascuzzi, Susan R. McCouch (2007). Functional markers for xa5-mediated resistance in rice (Oryza sativa, L). Mol. Breeding 19: 291-296.

Autio, K., T. Simoinen, T. Suortti, M. Salmenkallio- Marttila, K. Lassila, A. Wilhelmson (2001).Structural and Enzymic Changes in Germinated

Barley and Rye. J. Inst. Brew. 107: 19-25. Barrero, J. M., A. M. Anthony, J. Griffiths, T.Czechowski, W. R. Scheible, M. Udvardi, J. B. Reid, J. J. Ross, J. V. Jacobsen, F. Gubler (2010). Gene expression profiling identifies two regulatory genes controlling dormancy and ABA sensitivity in Arabidopsis seeds. The Plant Journal 61: 611-622.

Biddulph, T. B., J. A. Plummer, T. L. Setter, D. J. Mares (2008). Seasonal conditions influence dormancy and preharvest sprouting tolerance of wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) in the field. Field Crops Res. 107: 116-128.

Cai, J. X., and W. Chen (2008). Study on the physiological biochemistry of pre-harvest sprouting and scanning electron microscopy of glume in rice. Agric. Sci. Technol. 9: 75-80. (in Chinese)

Ceccato, D. V., H. D. Bertero, D. Batlla (2011).Environmental control of dormancy in Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa) seeds: two potential genetic resources for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. Seed Sci. Res. 21: 133-141.

Chang, C., H. P. Zhang, J. M. Feng, B. Yin, H. Q. Si, C.X. Ma (2010). Identifying alleles of Viviparous-1B associated with pre-harvest sprouting in micro-core collections of Chinese wheat germplasm. Mol. Breeding 25: 481-490.

Chao, S., S. S. Xu, E. M. Elias, J. D. Faris, M. E. Sorrells (2010). Identiication of chromosome locations of genes affecting preharvest sprouting and seed dormancy using chromosome substitution lines in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Crop Sci. 50: 1180-1187.

Chen, K. S., F. Li, S. L. Zhang (1999). Role of abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid in kiwifruit ripening.Acta. Horticulturae Sinica 26: 81-86 (in Chinese).

Curaba, J., T. Moritz, R. Blervaque, F. Parcy, V. Raz, M.Herzog, G. Vachon (2004). AtGA3ox2, a key gene responsible for bioactive gibberellin biosynthesis, is regulated during embryogenesis by LEAFY COTYLEDON2 and FUSCA3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 136: 3660-3669.

Debeaujon, I., K. M. Leon-Kloosterzie, M. Koornneef (2000). Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, and longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 122: 403-414.

DE PAUW, R. M., and T. N. McCAIG (1983).Recombining dormancy and white seed color in a spring wheat cross. Can. J. Plant Sci.63: 581-519.

Divashuk, M., N. Mayer, P. Kroupin, V. Rubets, V.Pylnev, N. Tkhi, T. Lin, A. Soloviev, G. Karlov (2012). The association between the allelic state of Vp-1B and pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in red-seeded hexaploid triticale. Open J. Genet. 2: 51-55.

Flintham, J. E., and M. D. Gale (1982). The tom thumb dwarfing gene, Rht3 in wheat, i. reduced pre- harvest damage to breadmaking quality. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62: 121-126.

Flintham, J. E., R. Adlam, M. Bassoi, M. Holdsworth, M.Gale (2002). Mapping genes for resistance to sprouting damage in wheat. Euphytica 126: 39-45.

Flintham, J. E. (2000). Different genetic components control coat-imposed and embryo-imposed dormancy in wheat. Seed Sci. Res. 10: 43-50.

Fofana, B., D.G. Humphreys, G. Rasul, S. Cloutier, A. Brule-Babel, S. Woods, O. M. Lukow , D. J. Somers (2009). Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a red white seeded spring wheat cross. Euphytica165: 509-521.

Gale, M. D., and C. C. Ainsworth (1984). The relationship between a-amylase species found in developing and germinating wheat grain. Biochem.Genet. 22: 1031-1036.

Gao, J. B., J. M. Pan, Q. W. Lu, J. F. Pan, M. G. Xu (2006). Influencing factors of wheat sprout in field and its prevention measures. Seed science and technology 25: 75-77 (in Chinese).

Gashi, B., K. Abdullai, V. Mata, E. Kongjika (2012).Effect of gibberellic acid and potassium nitrate on seed germination of the resurrection plants Ramonda serbica and Ramonda nathaliae. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11: 4537-4542.

Groos, C., G. Gay, M. R. Perretant, L. Gervais, M.Bernard, F. Dedryver, G. Charmet (2002). Study of the relationship between pre-harvest sprouting and grain color by quantitative trait loci analysis in a white x red grain bread wheat cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 39-47.

Gubler, F., and J. V. Jacobsen (1992). Gibberellin- responsive elements in the promoter of a barley high-pI alpha-amylase gene. Plant Cell 4: 1435-1441.

Guo, F. Z., W. G. Liang, Q. Q. Fan, C. Y. Huang, Q. R.Gao, G. Y. Li (2009). The distribution and evolution of allelic variation of Vp1B3 in Shandong Wheat. J. Triticeae Crops 29: 575-578 (in Chinese).

He, Z. T., X. L. Chen, Y. P. Han (2000). Progress on preharvest sprouting resistance in white. J. Triticeae Crops 20: 84-87 (in Chinese).

Henry, R. J., V. G. Battershell, P. S. Brennan, K. Oono (1992). Control of wheat a-amylase using inhibtors from cereals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 58:28l-284

Hilhorst, H. W. M. (1995). A critical update on seed dormancy.I. primary dormancy. Seed Sci. Res.5: 61-73.

Hoecker, U., I. K. Vasil, D. R. McCarty (1995).Integrated control of seed maturation and germination programs by activator and repressor functions of Viviparous-1 of maize. Genes Devel. 9: 2459-2469.

Jacobsen, J. V., D. W. Pearce, A. T. Poole, R. P. Pharis, L. N. Mander (2002). Abscisic acid, phaseic acid and gibberellin contents associated with dormancy and germination in barley. Physiol. Plant 115: 428-441.

Kato, K., W. Nakamura, T. Tabiki, H. Miura, S. Sawada (2001). Detection of loci controlling seed dormancy on group 4 chromosomes of wheat and comparative mapping with rice and barley genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 980-985.

Khursheed, B., and J. C. Rogers (1988). Barley alpha- amylase genes quantitative comparison of steady state mRNA levels from individual members of the two different families expressed in aleurone cells. J. Biot. Chem. 263: 18953-18960.

Knox, R. E., F. R. Clarke, J. M. Clarke, S. L. Fox, R. M.DePauw, A. K. Singh (2012). Enhancing the identification of genetic loci and transgressivesegregants for preharvest sprouting resistance in a durum wheat population. Euphytica 186: 193-206.

Kottearachchi, N. S., N. Uchino, K. Kato, H. Miura (2006). Increased grain dormancy in white- grained wheat by introgression of preharvest sprouting tolerance QTLs. Euphytica 152: 421-428.

Kulwal, P. L., N. Kumar, A. Gaur, P. Khurana, J. P.Khurana, A. K. Tyagi, H. S. Balyan, P. K. Gupta (2005). Mapping of a major QTL for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance on chromosome 3A in bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 1052-1059.

Kumar, A., J. Kumar, R. Singh, T. Garg, P. Chhuneja, H.S. Balyan, P. K. Gupta (2009). QTL analysis for grain colour and pre-harvest sprouting in bread wheat. Plant Sci. 177: 114-122.

Lazo, G. R., S. Chao, D. D. Hummel, H. Edwards, C. C.Crossman, N. Lui, D. E. Matthews, V. L. Carollo, D. L. Hane, F. M. You, G. E. Butler, R. E. Miller, T. J. Close, J. H. Peng, N. L. Lapitan, J. P. Gustafson, L. L. Qi, B. Echalier, B. S. Gill, M. Dilbirligi, H. S. Randhawa, K. S. Gill, R. A. Greene, M. E. Sorrells, E. D. Akhunov, J. Dvorak, A. M. Linkiewicz, J. Dubcovsky, K. G. Hossain, V. Kalavacharla, S. F. Kianian, A. A. Mahmoud, X. F. Ma, E. J. Conley, J. A. Anderson, M. S. Pathan, H. T. Nguyen, P. E. McGuire, C. O. Qualset, O. D. Anderson (2004). Development of an expressed sequence tag (EST) resource for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): EST generation, unigene analysis, probe selection and bioinformatics for a 16,000-locus bin-delineated map. Genetics 168: 585-593.

Lan, X. J., Y. L. Zheng, X. B. Ren, D. C. Liu, Y. M. Wei, Z. H. Yan (2005). Utilization of preharvest sprouting tolerance gene of synthetic wheat RSP. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 6: 204-209 (in Chinese).

Lu, Q. S., J. D. Paz, A. Pathmanathan, R. S. Chiu, A. Y.Tsai, S. Gazzarrini (2010). The C-terminal domain of FUSCA3 negatively regulates mRNA and protein levels, and mediates sensitivity to the hormones abscisic acid and gibberellic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 64: 100-113.

Lin, R. S., R. D. Horsley, P. B. Schwarz (2008).Associations between caryopsis dormancy, a- amylase activity, and pre-harvest sprouting in barley. J. Cereal Sci. 48: 446-456.

Lohwasser, U., M. S. Roder, A. Borner (2005). QTL mapping for the domestication traits pre-harvest sprouting and dormancy in wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). Euphytica 143: 247-249.

Macgregor, A. W., B. A. Marchylo, J. E. Kruger (1988).Multiple a-amylase components in germinated cereal grains determined by isoelectric focusing and chromatofocusing. Cereal Chem. 65: 326-333.

Marchylo, B. A., J. E. Kruger, A. W. Macgregor (1983).Production of multiple forms of a-amylase in germinated, incubated, whole, de-embryonated wheat kernels. Cereal Chem. 61: 305-310.

Mares, D., K. Marv, J. Cheong, K. Williams B.Watson, E. Storlie, M. Sutherland, Y. Zou (2005). A QTL located on chromosome 4A associated with dormancy in white-and red- grained wheats of diverse origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 1357-1364.

Mares, D., J. Rathjen, K. Mrva, J. Cheong (2009).Genetic and environmental control of dormancy in white-grained wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 168: 311-318.

Marzougui, S., K. Sugimoto, U. Yamanouchi, M.Shimono, T. Hoshino, K. Hori, M. Kobayashi, K. Ishiyama, M. Yano (2012). Mapping and characterization of seed dormancy QTLs using chromosome segment substitution lines in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124: 893-902.

Masojc, P., and P. Milczarski (2009). Relationship between QTLs for preharvest sprouting andalpha-amylase activity in rye grain. Mol. Breeding 23: 75-84.

Masojc, P., J. Zawistowski, N. K. Howes, T. Aung, M. D.Gale (1993). Polymorphim and chromosomal location of endogenous a-amylase inhibitor genes in common wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet.85: 1043-1048.

McCrate, A. J., M. T. Nielsen, G. M. Paulsen, E. G.Heyne (1982). Relationship between sprouting in wheat and embryo response to endogenous inhibition. Euphytica 31: 193-200.

McKibbin, R. S., M. D. Wilkinson, P. C. Bailey, J. E.Flintham, L. M. Andrew, P. A. Lazzeri, M. D. Gale, J. R. Lenton, M. J. Holdsworth (2002). Transcripts of Vp-1 homeologues are misspliced in modern wheat and ancestral species. Plant Biol. 99: 10203-10208.

Meinke, D. W., L. H. Franzmann, T. C. Nickle, E. C.Yeung (1994). Leafy cotyledon mutants of Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 6(8): 1049-1064. Miao, X. L., D. S. Wang, L. Q. Xia, Y. H. Zhang, Z. W.

Wang, Z. H. He, X. M. Chen (2011). Analysis on the mechanism of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in white-grain wheat. J. Triticeae Crops 31: 741-746 (in Chinese).

Mitsunaga, S., T. Tashiro, J. Yamaguchi (1994).Identification and characterization of gibberellin-insensitive mutants selected from among dwarf mutants of rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 705-712.

Mohan, A., P. Kulwal, R. Singh, V. Kumar, R. R. Mir, J.Kumar, M. Prasad, H. S. Balyan, P. K. Gupta (2009). Genome-wide QTL analysis for pre- harvest sprouting tolerance in bread wheat. Euphytica 168: 319-329.

Mori, M., N. Uchino, M. Chono, K. Kato, Miura H. (2005). Mapping QTLs for grain dormancy onwheat chromosome 3A and group 4 chromosomes, and their combined effect. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:1315-1323.

Morris, C. F., R. J. Anderberg, P. J. Goldmark, M. K.Walker-Simmons (1991). Molecular cloning and expression of abscisic acid sponsive genes in embryos of dormant wheat seeds. Plant Physiol.95: 814-821.

Monke, G., L. Altschmied, A. Tewes, W. Reidt, H. P.Mock, H. Baumlein, U. Conrad (2004). Seed- specific transcription factors ABI3 and FUS3: molecular interaction with DNA. Planta 219:158-166.

Mrva, K., and D. J. Mares (1996). Expression of late maturity a-amylase in wheat containing gibberellc acid insensitivity genes. Euphytica 88: 69-76.

Mundy, J., J. Hejgaard, I.Svendsen (1984). Characterization of a bifunctional wheat inhibitor of endogenous a-amylase and subtilisin. FEBS Lett. 167: 210-214

Munkvold, J. D., J. Tanaka, D. Benscher, M .E. Sorrells (2009). Mapping quantitative trait loci for preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119: 1223-1235.

Nakamura, S., and T. Toyama (2001). Isolation of a VP1 homologue from wheat and analysis of its expression in embryos of dormant and non- dormant cultivars. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 875-876.

Nambara, E., R. Hayama, Y. Tsuchiya, M. Nishimura, H.Kawaide, Y. Kamiya, S. Naito (2000). The Role of ABI3 and FUS3 loci in Arabidopsis thaliana on phase transition from late embryo development to germination. Dev. Biol. 220:412-423.

Ogbonnaya, F. C., M. Imtiaz, G. Ye, P. R. Hearnden, E.Hernandez, R. F. Eastwood, M. V. Ginkel, S. C. Shorter, J.M. Winchester (2008). Genetic and QTL analyses of seed dormancy and preharvest sprouting resistance in the wheat germplasm CN10955. Theor. Appl. Genet. 116: 891-902.

Osa, M., K. Kato, M. Mori, C. Shindo, A. Torada, H.Miura (2003). Mapping QTLs for seed dormancy and Vp1 homologue on chromosome 3A of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 1491-1496.

Paek, N. C., B. M. Lee, D. GyuBai, J. D. Smith (1998).Inhibition of germination gene expression by Viviparous-1 and ABA during maize kernel development. Mol. Cells. 8:336-342.

Piskurewicz, U., Y. Jikumaru, N. Kinoshita, E. Nambara, Y. Kamiya, L. Lopez-Molina (2008). The gibberellic acid signaling repressor RGL2 inhibits arabidopsis seed germination by stimulating abscisic acid synthesis and ABI5 activity. The Plant Cell 20: 2729-2745.

Ren, X. B., X. J. Lan, D. C. Liu, J. L. Wang, Y. L. Zheng (2008). Mapping QTLs for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance on chromosome 2D in a synthetic hexaploid wheatxcommon wheat cross. J. Appl. Genet. 49: 333-341.

Ried, J. L., and M. K. Walker-Simmons (1990).Synthesis of abscisic acid-responsive, heat- stable proteins in embryonic axes of dormant wheat grain. Plant Physiol. 93: 662-667.

Sun, Y. W., L. N. Nie, Y. Z. Ma, Z. S. Xiu, L. Q. Xia (2011). Cloning and functional analysis of viviparous-1 promoter in wheat. Acta. Agronomica Sinica. 37: 1743-1751 (in Chinese).

Suzuki, M., H. H. Wang, D. R. McCarty (2007).Repression of the LEAFY COTYLEDON 1/B3 Regulatory Network in Plant Embryo Development by VP1/Abscisic Acid Insensitive 3-like B3 genes. Plant Physiol. 143: 902-911. Sogaard, M., A. Kadziola, R. Haser, B. Svensson (1993). Site-directed mutagenesis of histidine 93, aspartic acid 180, glutamic acid 205, histidine 290, and aspartic acid 291 at the active site and tryptophan 279 at the raw starch binding site in Barley alpha-Amylase 1.. J. Biof. Chem. 268:22480-22484.

Steber, C. M., S. E. Cooney, P. McCourt (1998).Isolation of the GA-response mutant sly1 as a suppressor of ABI1-1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 149: 509-521.

Torada, A., S. Ikeguchi, M. Koike (2005). Mapping and validation of PCR-based markers associated with a major QTL for seed dormancy in wheat. Euphytica 143: 251-255.

Toradal, A., and Y. Amano (2002). Effect of seed coat color on seed dormancy in different environments. Euphytica 126: 99-105.

Wan, P., Z. Q. Ma, P.D. Chen, D. J. Liu (2001).Expression of a-Amy1 affected by Rht3 gene in wheat. J. Triticeae Crops. 21: 1-4 (in Chinese).

Wang, X. G., J. P. Ren, J. Yin (2008). The mechanism on wheat pre-harvest resistant sprouting. Chin. Agric. Sci. 24: 243-250 (in Chinese).

Weidner, S., U. Krupa, R. Amarowicz, M. Karamac, S. Abe (2002). Phenolic compounds in embryos of triticale caryopses at different stages of development and maturation in normal environment and after dehydration treatment. Euphytica 126: 115-122.

Weidner, S., R. Amarowicz, M. Karamac, G. Dabrowski (1999). Phenolic acids in caryopses of two cultivars of wheat, rye and triticale that display different resistance to pre-harvest sprouting. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 210: 109-113.

Wickham, L. D., H. C. Passam, L. A. Wilson (1984).Tuber development, storage and germination in yams (Dioscorea Spp.) in response to pre- harvest application of plant growth regulators. J. Agric. Sci. 102: 437-442.

Wilkinson, M. D., R. S. McKibbin, P. C. Bailey, J. E.Flintham, M. D. Gale, J. R. Lenton, M. J. Holdsworth (2002). Use of comparative molecular genetics to study pre harvest sprouting in wheat. Euphytica 126: 27-33.

Wilkinson, M., J. Lenton, M. Holdsworth (2005).Transcripts of Vp-1 homoeologues are alternatively spliced within the Triticeae tribe. Euphytica 143: 243-246.

Wu, Y., H. Q. Hu, G. Wang, Y. Z. Zhang, J. Ji (2002).Relationship between a-amylase activity and resistance of pre-harvest sprouting in spring wheat. J. Jilin Agric. University 24: 22-25 (in Chinese).

Wu, Y. L., Y. F. Yang, R. S. Ding (1996). Studies on preharvest sprouting of proanthocyanidin-free barley. J. Zhejiang Agric. University 22: 647- 650 (in Chinese).

Xia, G. H., D. P. Zhang, W. S. Jia (2000). Effects of IAA, GA and ABA on14C-sucrose import and metabolism in grape berries. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 27: 6-10 (in Chinese).

Xia, L. Q., Y. Yang, Y. Z. Ma, X. M. Chen, Z. H. He, M.S. Roder, H. D. Jones, P. R. Shewry (2009). What can the Viviparous-1 gene tell us about wheat pre-harvest sprouting. Euphytica 168:385-394.

Yanagisawa, A., T. Nishimura, Y. Amano, A. Torada, S.Shibata (2005). Development of winter wheat with excellent resistance to pre-harvest sprouting and rain damage. Euphytica 143: 313-318.

Yang, Y., Y. Z. Ma, Z. S. Xu, X. M. Chen, Z. H. He, Z.Yu, M. Wilkinson, H. D. Jones, P. R. Shewry, L. Q. Xia (2007). Isolation and characterization of Viviparous-1 genes in wheat cultivars with distinct ABA sensitivity and pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 2863-2871.

Yang, J. H., Y. X. Yu, J. S. Cheng, X. L. Tan, W. P. Shen (2011). Study on the pre harvest sprouting tolerance in Triticum aestivum ssp. Yunnanense King. J. Triticeae Crops 31: 747-752 (in Chinese).

Yang, Y., C. L. Zhang, X. M. Chen, D. S. Wang, L. Q.Xia, Z. F. Liu (2011). Identification and validatation of molecular markers for PHS tolerance in red-grained spring wheat. J. Triticeae Crops 31: 54-59 (in Chinese).

Yang, Y., C. L. Zhang, X. M. Chen, X. M. Chen, L. Q.Xia, D. S. Wang, Z. H. He, Z. Yu (2007). Identification of Wheat genotypes with pre- harvest sprouting tolerance by combinated analysis of spike germination rate, germination index and molecular marker Vp1B3. J. Triticeae Crops 27: 577-582 (in Chinese).

Yang, Y., X. L. Zhao, Y. Zhang, X. M. Chen, Z. H.He, Y. Zhou, L. Q. Xia (2008). Evaluation and validation of four molecular markers associated with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in Chinese wheats. Acta. Agronomica Sinica 34: 17-24.

Yuan, Y. P., X. Chen, S. H. Xiao, W. Zhang (2005).Extraction and identification of barley a- amylase/subtilisin inhibitor. J Triticeae Crops 25: 40-43 (in Chinese).

Zhang, H. P., J. M. Feng, C. Chang (2011). Investigation of main loci contributing to strong seed dormancy of Chinese wheat landrace. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 19: 270-277 (in Chinese).

Zhang, H. P., C. Chang, G. X. You, X. Y. Zhang, C. S.Yan, S. H. Xiao, H. Q. Si, J. Lu, C. X. Ma (2010). Identification of molecular markers associated with seed dormancy in mini core collections of Chinese wheat and landraces. Acta. Agronomica Sinica 36: 1649-1656.

Zhao, B., Y. X. Wan, R. Wang (2010). Screening of wheat cultivar resources with pre-harvest sprouting resistance. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 38:8900-8902 (in Chinese).

Zhu, Z. L., B. Tian, B. Liu, Q. G. Xie, J. C. Tian (2010).Quantitative trait loci analysis for pre-harvest sprouting using intact spikes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Shandong Agric. Sci. 6: 19-23 (in Chinese).
COPYRIGHT 2013 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences
Date:Jun 30, 2013
Words:6805
Previous Article:CASSAVA (Manihot esculenta Crantz) PERFORMANCE AS INFLUENCED BY NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZERS IN UYO, NIGERIA.
Next Article:EFFECTS OF DEFOLIATION AND NITROGEN UPTAKE ON FORAGE NUTRITIVE VALUES OF PENNISETUM SP.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters