Printer Friendly

Expression of Cdc25B mRNA in duodenal mucosa of chicken.

INTRODUCTION

Cell division cycle 25(Cdc25) phosphatases family are key regulators of the eukaryotic cell cycle that are highly conserved in the process of organic evolution (Nisson et al., 2000). Cdc25 phosphatases are involved in the control of the earlier embryonic development and when the phosphatases were activated abnormally which is frequently associated with genesis of a series of human tumors. It is widely considered that overexpression of Cdc25B is correlated with the genesis, development and prognosis of various cancers (Hortwell, 1994). Detection of the expression level of Cdc25B in cells is promising to represent a molecular index judging the mitosis index and reproductive activity of tumour cell (Zai et al., 2006). Chicken is a most important model system in developmental biology. There is no duodenal gland in the muscularis mucosae of chicken which is different from that of mammals. And the studies about conservative genetic structure and function of chicken not only can explain its role in developmental biology, but also apply to the prophylaxis and control of diseases in mammal and human (Claudio, 2005). An extended ananlysis of Cdc25B expression in adult mice had been carried out by Dineli Wickramainghe et al. (1995), and the result revealed that transcripts were observed in the kidney, liver, heart and muscle. But the expression pattern of Cdc25B in adult chicken hasn't been reported yet. The intestinal crypt and epithelium mucosae of mammals was divided into the five regions, including the region of the stem cell and Paneth's cell in basilar part, the region of proliferation cell in the middle part of intestinal gland, the region of maturation in upper half of intestinal gland, function region and shedding part of upper half of intestinal villus. However, the functional partition of chicken intestinal gland has not been reported yet. Our studies are meant to investigate the distribution of Cdc25B in the duodenal mucosa of chicken, and compare it with the expression pattern of Cdc25B in adult tissues of mammals, providing some molecular evidences at the gene level that could elucidate the regular pattern of avian intestinal tract epitheliosis and functional partition. Sense and antisense digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA probes were designed to detect the distribution of Cdc25B mRNA in the duodenal mucosa of chicken, by means of in situ hybridization histochemistry (ISHH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All protocols were approved by the Chinese Committee for Animal Use for Research and Education.

Tissue preparation

Ten adult male or female tender chickens with age of 65 days and weight of 1.5-2.0 kg were purchased from Nanjing Farm product market (Nanjing, Eastern China). The birds were housed for an adaptation period of 3-4 days and were then anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ethylurethane at 1 g/kg and were fastened onto a stereotaxic frame. A horizontal incision, about 5 cm long, was made in the infrapubic region of the abdominal wall, 2 cm ventrally to the shaft of the pubis.

The musculus obliquus externus abdominus, musculus rectus abdominus, musculus transversus abdominus, and the very thin peritoneum were then cut open. The small intestine was exposed through this incision. The small intestine from the pylorus of stomach to duodenojejunal flexure was tentatively regarded as the duodenum. The chickens were deeply anaesthetized and were perfused downward through the left common carotid artery with physiological saline, followed by a fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, (4[degrees]C, pH 7.4). The duodenum portion was dissected out separately from the small intestine. Tissues were immersed in the same fresh fixative for 4 h and then stored overnight in a 20% sucrose solution at 4[degrees]C. Frozen serial sections (10 ^m) were prepared by cutting in the longitudinal plane of the duodenum, and were placed on polylysine-coated glass slides.

Embryos

Fertile hens' eggs were incubated at 38[degrees]C in a humidified incubator to yield embryos of appropriate stages (HH 10) (Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951) according to Hamburger and Hamilton, and isolated embryos from yolk (Mozdziak et al., 2008).

Probe preparations

For the preparation of sense and antisense Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA probes, total RNA was isolated from chicken embryos using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Fragment of Cdc25B mRNA genes was obtained by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR from the total RNA of chicken embryos. The following primers which according to Benazeraf et al. (2006) were used to amplify a 575 bp cDNA of Cdc25B mRNA by PCR: 5'-GGAGCCCTGCGTGCCGAG-3 '(AJ720997: 800-818) and 5'-CAATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGTCCTGGTGTTTG CC-3'(AJ720997:1359-1375). The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel.

The amplified cDNA fragment by PCR was subcloned into pGM-T easy vector (TIANGEN, Peking, China) using the TA cloning system. And then the plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5a and chosen by "white-blue plaque selection". Subsequently, the positive recombinant Cdc25B/ pGM-T easy vector plasmids were identified by sequencing. The recombinants were linearized with the restriction enzymes NcoI and Spel (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The linearized recombinant plasmid was used as templates for in vitro transcription. Sense and antisense Digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes of the Cdc25B RNA were produced in vitro transcription by using SP6 and T7 RNA polymerase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), respectively, according to the manufacturer's instructions of "DIG RNA Labeling Kit (SP6/T7)" (Roche). Certificated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel and determined by spectrophotometer, both the sense and antisense RNA probes were prepared.

In situ hybridization

For the in situ hybridization experiments, the custom service from Young et al. (1986) and Su (1998) was performed essentially with the following modifications for the detection of Cdc25B mRNA transcripts. Briefly, tissue sections were rinsed 2 times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PBS) at pH 7.4 for 5 min, in glycine-PBS at 0.1 mol/L for 5 min, in 0.3% TritonX-100-PBS for 5 min and were digested with proteinase-K-PBS for 30 min at 37[degrees]C, followed by fixing in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, treating with triethanolamine-acetic anhydride, and washing. Then sections were prehybridized for 2 h and hybridized at 42[degrees]C for 18 h in hybridization solution containing DIG-labeled RNA antisense probe at 2 ^g/ml.

After hybridization the tissue was subjected to stringent washing in 50% 2 x standard saline citrate (SSC), 1 x SSC, and 0.1 x SSC, at 37[degrees]C, for 10 min each. Then the sections were rinsed again in PBS, blocked for 30 min with 1.5% normal goat serum (TIANGEN BIOTECH CO., LTD. Peking, China) in PBS, and rinsed in PBS. The sections were then incubated with goat anti-DIG antibody (Roche, Nutley, NJ) at 1:100 to 1:1,000 for 2 h at 4[degrees]C. After a rinse in PBS for 10 min, the sections were incubated in 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT; Roche USA) complex for 1 h-16 h at room temperature

and examined under a standard light microscope. Every 3 serial sections of duodenum portion of intestine were designated as a group, and within each group, the first section was stained with Haematoxylin and eosin (HE) to display epithelia cells; the second one was stained with antisense probe of Cdc25B mRNA, and the last one was used as control of ISHH, in which the antisense probe was replaced with sense probe of CDC25B mRNA.

Statistical data

The reacted sections were examined with a BH-2 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The positive cells were distributed in corresponding campus visualize in the 2 serial sections that had been hybridized with Cdc25B antisense probe, and stained with Haematoxylin and eosin, respectively, were counted. The numbers of Cdc25B-positive cells and Haematoxylin and eosin-stained cells observed at each location were expressed as the mean [+ or -] SE (n = 10 chickens) in Table 1.

RESULTS

Results of probe preparation

Figure 1 showed the gelectrophoresis of the fragments from RT-PCR. After PCR, 3 [micro]l of product was run on agarose gel of 2% to check the DNA band. There were two bands, one was between 500 bp and 750 bp and the other one was with the size of 250 bp. Then the bands were cut out, followed by purification using the gel kit of DNA purification kit (TIANGEN, Peking, China). Both of the fragments were subcloned into pGM-T easy vectors (TIANGEN, Peking, China) using the TA cloning system respectively. And then the plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5a and chosen by "white-blue plaque selection". Subsequently, the positive recombinant Cdc25B/pGM-T easy vector plasmids were identified by sequencing. The sequence results confirmed that the 575 bp does the target Cdc25B gene. And the product with the size of 250 bp was a non-specific PCR reaction. Figure 2 showed the result of Cdc25B/pGM-Teasy digested with EcoRI.

Results of ISHH

The mucous membrane chorioepithelium of avian digestive tract is composed of absorptive cells, goblet cells and endocrine cells. In addition to above three kinds of cells, intestinal crypt of chicken contains the undifferentiated cells and Paneth's cells. The undifferentiated cells are mainly distributed in lower half of intestinal gland and have columnar shape in interphase of mitosis. The cytoplasm of these cells appears basophilia and stains with eosin and their nucleus are elongated near to basal surface (Shown as Figure 3A and B). The labeled cells stained with BCIP/NBT and appear amethyst. The positive signals of Cdc25B mRNA hybridizated with antisense were observed mainly distributing in the undifferentiated cells of intestinal gland (Shown as Figure 3C-E).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Under lower power lens, there were many labeled cells distributing in the duodenal mucosa of adult chicken. The signals of ISHH were decreased from basilar part to upper in the crypt of lieberkuhn and disappeared in the inferior of villi of small intestine. Figure 3C showed that the labeled cells were both negative in the lamina muscularis mucosae and muscular layer. And turned to the high power lens, most of these labeled cells observed were positive in the regions of the stem cell and proliferation localized districts of undifferentiated cells. The positive signals were both in the cytoplasm and cell nucleus (Shown as Figure 3E). Control experiment was performed as above method of ISHH by sense probe of DIG-labelled Cdc25B- mRNA instead of anti-sense probe and the signal of hybridization was negative (Shown as Figure 3F).

Results of statistics

Many Cdc25B mRNA-positive cells that were labeled by Cdc25B mRNA antisense probes were distributed in the basilar and upper part of the crypt of lieberkuhn, and the positive signals were both in the cytoplasm and cell nucleus. The signals of ISHH were decreased from basilar part to upper in the crypt of lieberkuhn and weakened in the inferior of villi of small intestine observed from Table 1. The percentages of Cdc25B mRNA-positive neurons in the basilar part and midportion of crypt of lieberkuhn were 81.60% and 36.21% in the upper part of the crypt of lieberkuhn and inferior of the intestinal villis of adult chicken, which were shown in Table 1.

DISCUSSION

The previous studies suggested that Cdc25 homologues control the entry into mitosis through dephosphorylating and activating specific substrate cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) to regulate the progression of cell division cycle and transition (Gould and Nurse, 1989; Dunphy and Kumagai, 1991; Gautier et al., 1991; Millar et al., 1991; Strausfeld et al., 1991; Lee et al., 1992). Cdc25 phosphatase was first identified in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (S. pombe; Russell and Nurse, 1986). Then it was found that Cdc25 existed in all eukaryotic organisms except plants (Boudolf, 2006). Three isoforms have been identified in mammalian: Cdc25A, Cdc25B and Cdc25C (Sadhu, 1990; Galaktionov, 1991; Nagata, 1991). Only Cdc25A and Cdc25C have been found in xenopus laevis and two isoforms (Gallus gallus; Cdc25A and Cdc25B) were found in chicken (Lzumi et al., 1993; Okazaki et al., 1996; Benaeraf et al., 2006). To date, the existence of Cdc25C in chicken has not been reported yet (Rose Boutros, 2007).

As an inducer, Cdc25B phosphatase plays a crucial role at the onset of mitosis. Several studies support the concept that the G2/M checkpoint response in cells to DNA damage is closely correlated with tumorigenesis and Cdc25B functions as a key regulator of the cell cycle progression which represents an effective target for cancer therapy (Ma et al., 2006). In the study of Lammer (1998), injection of anti-body against Cdc25B caused cells to arrest after they reach G2 phase. Dineli et al. used the method of ISHH to detect the existence of Cdc25B in most organs of adult mouse, and the results indicated that lower level of Cdc25B were observed in the adrenal gland, kidney, liver and muscle. The expression level of Cdc25B was higher in the brain and small intestine, and was the highest in lung and spleen (Dineli et al., 1995). The expression pattern of Cdc25B suggested that the expression level of Cdc25B was related with the development of mouse. With regard to the expression pattern of Cdc25B in chicken, only few have been reported by Bertrand Benazeraf (2006) in the early embryos experiment. There is not any paper about the distribution of Cdc25B in duodenal mucosa of chicken till now. In order to investigate the association between the expression level of Cdc25B and proliferative cells, we designed the sense and antisense probes of digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA probes to analysis the expression condition of Cdc25B mRNA in chicken and found that Cdc25B mRNA was distributed widely in duodenal mucosa of chicken, especially in the stem cells of intestinal gland which were in the mitosis phase. The widely distribution pattern of Cdc25B mRNA indicated that Cdc25B played a critical role in proliferation, migration and differentiation of small intestinal epithelium mucosa in chicken.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

The avian small intestinal epithelium mucosae is composed of absorptive cells, goblet cells and endocrine cells. Like epithelium, intestinal crypt contains undifferentiated cells and Paneth's cells besides above three kinds of cells. The undifferentiated cells lie in the lower halves of the gland and represent the major stem cells which are often in the mitosis phase. The replenishment of the absorptive cells and goblet cells fallen off from the top of intestinal villus is provided by the continual proliferation of the undifferentiated cells. Both the enteroendocrine cell and Paneth's cell are deriving from the undifferentiated cell which is considered as stem cell of enteric epithelium. When the undifferentiated cell differentiates and migrates from basilar to upper part of intestinal villus, the microvillus become more and longer and the content of RNA becomes fewer. According to the renewal process of enterocytes, epithelium mucosae of small intestine of mammal is divided into five regions, containing the region of the stem cell and Paneth's cell in basilar part, the region of proliferation cell in the middle of intestinal gland, the region of maturation in upper half of intestinal gland, function region and shedding part of upper half of intestinal villus. The stem cells of proliferation region migrate upward and displace millions of cells falling off from upper half of gastrointestinal tract. Only intestinal crypt has proliferative activities in small intestine (Cheng et al., 2003). Large numbers positive Cdc25B mRNA cells were observed in the present study. Of these labeled cells, 81.60 [+ or -] 9.63% and 36.21 [+ or -] 8.81% Cdc25B mRNA positive cells were distributed in the basilar and midportion part and middle and inferior portion of intestinal villi of adult chickens respectively. The distribution pattern suggested that the existence of Cdc25B mRNA and athletic proliferation activities in the duodenal mucosa of adult chicken. This result corresponded with the version that intestine crypt has proliferating and the proliferation tendency kept concordance with the divided regions of mammals. Consequently, we presumed that the intestinal crypt and epithelium mucosae of chicken were also divided into the same five regions as that of mammals.

Cdc25B is a short-half-life protein (Gabrielli et al., 1996). There are five Cdc25B splice variants and they represent different levels in human and mammalian cells. The physiology discrepancy of these variants is still unclear because most previous related studies did not distinguish the variants (Rose Boutros, 2006). However, it is clear that Cdc25B variants shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm between S phase and mitosis, and this process is mediated by a combination of 14-3-3 binding and the existence of both Nuclear Export Signal(NES) and Nuclear Localization Signal (NLS) in Cdc25B sequence (Bulavind et al., 2001; Lindqvist, 2004; Uchida, 2004). The expression levels of Cdc25 mRNA, protein, activity of kinase appear to be constant during the cell cycle. And the expression of Cdc25B is detected throughout the whole cell cycle. Inactived Cdk1/cyclinB complex localizes in the cytoplasm and Cdc25B in the nucleus during the interphase. But in the G1 phase, Cdc25B localizes both in cytoplasm and nucleus, then it accumulates during the late S and early G2 phases of the cell cycle and its activity peaks at the G2/M transition. In the late G2 phase, Cdc25B is transported into the cytoplasm again and activated through dephosphorylating and activating Cdk1/cyclinB complex to enhance the entry into mitotic phase (Gabrielli, 1996; Lindqvist, 2005). However, Cdc25B is transported to nuclear zone again in the mitotic phase (Gasparotto, 1997). The positive signals of ISHH observed in the present study were both in the cytoplasm and cell nucleus, which is strongly supported the concept in molecule morphologically that Cdc25B is presented during each stage of cell cycle and accumulates during the late S and early G2 phases of the cell cycle and its activity peaks at the G2/M transition, shuttling between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Dr Fabienne Pituello (CNRS) for helping us to designing primers. This study was supported by grants (no 30671513 and no 30871833) from the National Science Foundation of China.

REFERENCES

Bertrand, B., Q. S. Chen, E. Peco and P. Fabienne. 2006. Identification of an unexpected link between the Shh pathway and a G2/M regulator. the phosphatase CDC25B. Dev. Biol. 294:133-147.

Boudolf, V., D. Inze and L. De Veylder. 2006. What it higher Plants lack a CDC25 phosphatase? Trends Plant Sci. 11:474-479.

Boutros, R., C. Dozier and B. Ducommun. 2006. The when and where of Cdc25 phosphatases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18:1-7.

Boutros, R., V. Lobjois and B. Ducommun. 2007. CDC25 phosphatases in cancer cells: key players? Good targets? Cancer 7:495-507.

Bulavind, V., Y. Higashimoto and J. Popoffi. 2001. Initiation of a G2/M checkpoint after ultraviolet radiation requires P38 kinase. Nature 411- 6833:102-107.

Cheng, L. Z., C. P. Zhong and W. Q. Cai. 2003. Modern histology. Publishing company of Shanghai science technology literature. Shanghai.

Claudio, D. 2005. The chick: A great model system commentary becomes even greater. Dev. Cell 8:9-17.

Dunphy, W. G. and A. Kumagai. 1991. The cdc25 protein contains an intrinsic phosphatase activity. Cell 67:189-196.

Lammer, C. and S. Wagerer. 1998. The cdc25B phosphatase is essential for the G2/M phase transition in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 111:2445-2453.

Feng, Y. M., J. X. Liu and Q. S. Chen. 2008. Preparation of chicken SP-mRNA probe and its detection in INR by in situ hybridizati on histochem istry. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 39(1):117-122.

Gaberielli, B., C. Desouza and K. Ellem. 1996. Cytoplasmic accumulation of cdc25B phosphatase in mitosis triggers centrosomal microtubule nucleation in HeLa cells. J. Cell Sci. 109:1081-1093.

Galaktionov, K. and D. Beach. 1991. Specific activation of CDC25 tyrosine phosphatases by B-type cyclins: evidence for multiple roles of mitotic cyclins. Cell 67:1181-1194.

Gasparotto, D., R. Maestro and S. Piccinin. 1997. Overexpression of CDC25A and CDC25B in head and neck cancers. Cancer Res. 57-12:2366-2368.

Gautier, J., M. J. Solomon, R. N. Booher, J. F. Bazan and M. W. Kirschner. 1991. Cdc25 is a specific tyrosine phosphatase that directly activates p34cdc2. Cell 67:197-211.

Gould, K. L. and P. Nurse. 1989. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the fission yeast cdc2+ protein kinase regulates entry into mitosis. Nature 342:39-45.

Hamburger, V. and H. L. Hamilton. 1951. A series of normal stages in thedevelopment of the chick embryo. Dev. Dyn. 195: 23-272.

Hortwell, L. H. and M. B. Kastan. 1994. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science 266:1821-1828.

Izumi, T. and J. Maller. 1993. Elimination of cdc2 phosphorylation sites in the CDC25 phosphatase blocks initiation of M-phase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1337-1350.

Lee, M. S., S. Ogg, M. Xu, L. L. Parker, D. J. Donaghue, J. M. Maller and H. Piwnica-Worms. 1992. Cdc25+ encodes a protein phosphatase that dephosphorylates [p34.sup.cdc2]. Mol. Biol. Cell 3:73-84.

Lindqvist, A., H. Kallstrom and C. Rosenthalk. 2004. Characterisation of Cdc25B localisation and nuclear export during the cell cycle and in response to stress. J. Cell Sci. 117: 4979-4990.

Lindqvist, A., H. Kallstrom and A. Lundgren. 2005. CDC25B cooperates with CDC25A to induce mitosis but has a unique role in activating cyclin B1/Cdk1 at the cent rosome. J. Cell Biol. 171-1: 35-45.

Ma, Y. T. and H. Qi. 2006. Functions and regulation mechanisms of CDC25 in cell cycle progression and response to cell cycle checkpoint. Journal of Xi'an University of Art s & Science (Nat. Sci. Ed). 9-4.

Millar, J. B. A., C. H. McGowan, G. Lenaers, R. Jones and P. Russell. 1991. [p80.sup.cdc25] mitotic inducer is the tyrosine phosphatase that activates [p34.sup.cdc2] kinase in fission yeast. EMBO J. 10:4301-4309.

Mozdziak, P. E., D. Hodgson and J. N. Petitte. 2008. Avian somatic cell chimeras using surrogate eggshell technology. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21:801-806.

Nagata, A., M. Igarashi and S. Jinno. 1991. An additional homolog of the fissonyeast CDC25 gene occurs in humans and is highly expressed in some cancer cells. New Biol. 3:959-968.

Nisson, I. and I. Hoffmann. 2000. Cell cycle regulation by the Cdc25 phosphatase family. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 4:107-114.

Okazaki, K. 1996. Isolation of a cDNA encoding the xenopus homologue of mammalian CDC25A that can induce meiotic maturation of oocytes. Gene 178:111-114.

Russell, P. and P. Nurse. 1986. Cdc25 function as an inducer of the mitotic control of fission yeast. Cell 45:145-153.

Sadhu, K., S. Reed and H. Richardson. 1990. Human homolog of fission yeast CDC25 mitotic inducer is predominantly expressed in G2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:5139-5143.

Strausfield, U., J. C. Labbe, D. Fesquet, J. C. Caradore, A. Picard, K. Sadhu, P. Russell and M. Doree. 1991. Dephosphorylation and activation of a [p34.sup.cdc2]/cyclin B complex in vitro by human CDC25 protein. Nature 351:242-245.

Su, B. Y., W. Q. Cai and C. G. Zhang. 1998. Expression of nov in spinal cord of vertebrates. Chin. J. Neurosci. 14-3:237-241.

Uchidas, Ohtsubom and Shimuram. 2004. Nuclear export signal in CDC25B. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 316:226-232.

Wickramasinghe, D., S. Becker and P. Donovan. 1995. Two CDC25 homologues are differentially expressed during mouse. Dev. 121:2047-2056.

Young, W., T. Bonner and M. Brann. 1986. Mesencephalic dopamine neurons regulate the expression of neuropeptide mRNAs in the rat forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83:9827-9831.

Zai, D. Z. and Q. Huang. 2006. Study of cdc2 and tumorigenesis in malignant tumor. Cancer 26-5.

Junhui Qin (a), Hui Zhang (a), Huijun Bao, Qiang Zhou, Yi Liu, Chunsheng Xu, Xiaohong Chu and Qiusheng Chen **

College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China

* This study was supported by grants (no 30671513 and no 30871833) from the National Science Foundation of China.

** Corresponding Author: Qiusheng Chen. Tel: +86-25-84395 817, Fax: +86-25-84398699, E-mail: chenqsh305@yahoo.com.cn

(a) These authors have contributed equally to this work.

Received July 16, 2009; Accepted October 8, 2009
Table 1. Percentages of cell devision cycle 25 mRNA-positive cells
in the basilar part and midportion of crypt of lieberkuhn and
middle and basilar portion of villi of small intestine in adult
chickens

        Basilar part and midportion of crypt of lieberkuhn

                           Haematoxylin and
n     Result of ISHH (1)    eosin staining    Percentage (%)

 1           297                 324              91.67
 2            54                  73              73.97
 3           394                 459              85.84
 4           553                 712              77.67
 5           306                 324              94.44
 6           578                 644              89.75
 7           287                 375              76.53
 8           418                 477              87.63
 9           467                 632              73.90
10           115                 178              64.61
             Mean                                 81.60
             S.D.                                  9.63

      Middle and basilar portion of villi of small intestine

                           Haematoxylin and
n     Result of ISHH (1)    eosin staining    Percentage (%)

 1            34                 145              23.45
 2            15                  39              38.46
 3            67                 169              39.64
 4            87                 317              27.44
 5            55                 176              31.25
 6            91                 209              43.54
 7            24                  56              42.86
 8            68                 257              26.46
 9            78                 206              37.86
10            23                  45              51.11
                                                  36.21
                                                   8.81

(1) ISHH = In situ hybridization histochemistry.
COPYRIGHT 2010 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Qin, Junhui; Zhang, Hui; Bao, Huijun; Zhou, Qiang; Liu, Yi; Xu, Chunsheng; Chu, Xiaohong; Chen, Qius
Publication:Asian - Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9CHIN
Date:Mar 19, 2010
Words:4102
Previous Article:Evaluation of multi-microbial probiotics produced by submerged liquid and solid substrate fermentation methods in broilers.
Next Article:Effects of individuals and behaviors on acoustic features of ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters