Printer Friendly

Exposure draft issued on outsourcing; focuses on disclosure, oversight.

In response to recent discussion and debate by members of Congress, the media and federal and state regulators about the responsibilities of businesses to disclose to customers and clients when they outsource services, the Professional Ethics Executive Committee earlier this year formed a task force to explore issues surrounding outsourcing to third-party service providers. On Aug. 9, the PEEC issued an exposure draft that focuses on disclosure to clients, the member's responsibility for all work, and maintaining the confidentiality of client information. Specifically, the proposals include a revision to Ethics Ruling No. 1 under Rule 301, "Computer Processing of Clients' Returns," and new ethics rulings under Rule 102, "Integrity and Objectivity"; Rule 201, "General Standards"; and Rule 202, "Compliance With Standards."

The proposed ethics ruling under Rule 102, "Integrity and Objectivity," would require that a member inform the client that he or she may be using a third-party service provider when providing professional services to the client, prior to sharing confidential client information with the service provider.

The proposed ethics ruling under Rule 201, "General Standards," and Rule 202, "Compliance With Standards," clarifies the application of Rules 201 and 202 to members who use a third-party service provider in providing professional services to clients, and makes clear the committee's position that the member is responsible for all work performed by the service provider.

Finally, the proposed revisions to ethics ruling No. 1 under Rule 301, "Computer Processing of Clients' Returns," would update and broaden the application of the ethics ruling beyond that of an outside tax service bureau and make it applicable to any third-party service provider used by the member. The revised ethics ruling also clarifies that disclosing confidential client information to a third-party service provider for the purpose of providing professional services to clients or for administrative support purposes would not be in violation of Rule 301, "Confidential Client Information"; however, the member would be required to enter into a contractual agreement with the third-party service provider to maintain the confidentiality of the client's information, and use reasonable care in determining that the third-party service provider has appropriate procedures in place to prevent the unauthorized release of confidential client information.

Responses to the exposure draft must be received at the AICPA by Oct. 8, 2004. Interested parties can view the exposure draft at:

www.aicpa.org/members/div/ethics/ed_outsourcing.htm
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Professional Ethics Executive Committee
Publication:CPA Letter
Date:Sep 1, 2004
Words:394
Previous Article:Complying with ethics interpretation 101-3 on providing non-attest services to attest clients.
Next Article:AICPA supports concept of regulating tax preparers, refund anticipation loan providers.
Topics:


Related Articles
Exposure Draft Issued on Modernized Independence Rules.
Ensuring ethical effectiveness: new rules mean virtually every company will need a code of ethics.
Exposure drafts outstanding.
Exposure drafts outstanding.
Exposure drafts outstanding.
AICPA considers additional outsourcing guidance.
Exposure drafts outstanding.
More talk, more action: a changing role for corporate boards and CPAs.
Unexpected pitfalls in offshore patent preparation.
Effective date approaches for new ethics rulings on outsourcing.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |