Printer Friendly

Expert: commercial buildings should reduce bomb risks.

While tougher building codes may help new construction withstand bomb attacks, existing buildings also can take steps to lessen the damage of potential bombs, said Darrell Barker, vice president of extreme loads and structural risks for ABS Consulting in San Antonio.

After the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City in 1995, the federal government changed requirements for its new construction, Barker said.

For instance, it required windows to be glazed to prevent shattering, as well as requiring improved wall construction and the structural integrity of buildings.

"In Oklahoma City, an external column failed and a large girder on the outside failed, and the building collapsed into itself. So now they've put more continuity into the structure, so if they lose a column, it doesn't bring the rest of the building down," Barker said.

The federal government also evaluated its existing buildings, and began to systematically retrofit them to become more resistant to bombs. Barker said he expects to see commercial building codes--especially those for multistory buildings--also strengthened.

There are a number of steps companies are already taking to make their buildings more resistant to bombs. For instance, putting a film over windows to help prevent the glass from shattering, which can serve double-duty in that it also helps the building become more energy efficient, Barker said.

Installing safety film on glass is one of the cheapest ways to mitigate damage from a bomb, he said. It costs $5 to $10 per square foot of glass, as compared to $50 per square foot to replace windows with laminated glass.

It's also a good idea to have a strong and very visible security force that patrols outside of the building, as well as inside, Barker said. Also, companies can defend their perimeter by installing concrete barriers, such as large planters, so vehicles can't get too close to the building. That can cost about $100 per foot, Barker said.
COPYRIGHT 2004 A.M. Best Company, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Loss/Risk Management Notes
Author:Green, Meg
Publication:Best's Review
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 1, 2004
Words:320
Previous Article:Pull the plug.
Next Article:Aggressive accounting practice may lead to increased lawsuits.
Topics:


Related Articles
Security alert as WTC bombing anniversary marked.
Bomb threat guidelines for association events.
Editor's corner.
Munitions sector 'in trouble,' despite new funds: Defense department warned about problems with declining supplier base. (Analysis).
A megabyte of prevention. (Up front: news, trends & analysis).
Security and risk management: a fundamental business issue: all organizations must focus on the management issues of security, including...
Trial by fire: insurers are using technology to manage wildfire risk more effectively.
Sunrise or sunset: agents and brokers fear an end to TRIA could signal an end to the industry.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters