Experimental exposure to 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol from the pre-puberty causes damage in sperm production and motility in adulthood/Exposicao experimental ao 3-monocloropropano-1,2-diol, a partir da pre-puberdade, causa alteracao na producao e motilidade espermatica na idade adulta.
3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol(3-MCPD) is a well-known food contaminant, and has been detected in processed foods, including cereals, coffee, fish, meat products, dairy products, soy sauce based on acid hydrolyzed vegetable protein (Baer, De La Calle, & Taylor, 2010). This compound can be found as free form or esterified with long-chain fatty acids (Zelinkova, Svejkovska, Velisek, & Dolezal, 2006, Fu et al., 2007).
The exact mechanism of 3-MCPD formation is still unknown (Rahn & Yaylayan, 2011). However, the compound may be formed during thermic processing, as a reaction product of triacylglycerols, phospholipids or glycerol and hydrochloric acid in fat-based or fat-containing foods, and refinement process in vegetable fats and oils (Jcdrkiewicz, Kupska, Glowacz, Gromadzka, & Namiesnik, 2016). Moreover, domestic processing (e.g. grilling and toasting) and the migration from coating materials treated with epichlorohydrin also can increase the 3MCPD levels in foods (Crews, Brereton, & Davies, 2001, Hamlet & Sadd, 2009).
The maximum tolerable daily intake of the 3MCPD is 2 [micro]g [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1]. According its food occurrence and consumption, the exposure calculated of the compound for general population might range 0.02 - 0.7 [micro]g [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1]. However, high consumers might ingest of 0.06 to 2.3 [micro]g [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1] of 3-MCPD (Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO] & World Health Organization [WHO], 2007).
The presence of this contaminant in the diet raises concerns for the risks it may pose to health, due potential carcinogenic, effect possibly mediated by mechanisms involving either hormonal disturbances or cytotoxicity (Robjohns, Marshall, Fellows, & Kowalczyk, 2003). Moreover, Cho et al. (2008) indicate kidneys, testis and ovary as potential targets of the 3-MCPD toxicity.
3-MCPD has been associated to reproductive impact in adult rats (Sun et al., 2013, Sawada et al., 2015), but the effects of the exposure from the prepubertal period are unknown. Spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis are not yet fully established during prepuberty, which in rat occurs at postnatal day 36-55 or 60 (Clegg, 1960, Ojeda, Andrews, Advis, & White, 1980). This phase of the postnatal sexual development has been related as a critical period and more susceptible to reproductive impairment caused by chemical agents (Johnson, Welsh, & Wilker, 1997). That is why the possible reproductive insults caused by exposure in prepuberty should be particularly investigated (Perobelli, 2014).
Children and adolescents may be more exposed to the 3-MCPD than the adults (Li, Nie, Zhou, & Xie, 2015). Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on reproductive endpoints of the 3-MCPD-exposure from the prepuberty. For this, testicular and epididymal histology and sperm parameters were analyzed, using the reproductive tract of Wistar rats as the experimental model.
Material and methods
Male (45 days old, n = 40) Wistar rats supplied by the Central Vivarium of Unoeste--Universidade do Oeste Paulista--were housed in the Vivarium of Experimentation at the Unoeste. During the experiment, animals were allocated into polypropylene cages (43 X 30 X 15 cm) with laboratory-grade pine shavings as bedding. Rats were maintained under controlled temperature (23 [+ or -] 1[degrees]C) and lighting conditions (12L, 12D photoperiod). Rat chow and filtered tap water were provided ad libitum. The experimental protocol followed the Ethical Principles in Animal Research of the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation and was approved by the Ethics Committee for Use of Animals at the Unoeste (Protocol # 2055-CEUA).
Experimental design and treatment
The study was conducted according to the experimental design described below. Rats were randomly assigned into four experimental groups. Control animals (n = 10) received vehicle (saline solution 0.9%), for 30 days by gavage. Rats from the 3-MCPD groups (n = 10 [group.sup.-1]) received 2.5 (treated A - TA); 5 (treated B - TB) or 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1] (treated C - TC) of 3-MCPD (Sigma Chemical CO, St. Louis, U.S.A.) diluted in saline solution 0.9%, for 30 days by gavage. Rats were weighed three times for week and had your daily intake estimated ration (in g) and water (in milliliter). In addition, clinical signs of toxicity were observed.
At the end of treatment rats from each experimental group were euthanized with sodium thiopental (100 mg [kg.sup.-1]), by intraperitoneal administration.
The right testis, epididymis and vas deferens, ventral prostate, seminal vesicle (without the coagulating gland and full of secretion), liver, kidneys and pituitary were removed and their weights (absolute and relative to body weights) were determined.
Immediately after euthanasia, the left vas deferens was collected and spermatozoa were obtained with the aid of a syringe and needle, through internal rinsing with 1.0 mL of PBS solution at 34[degrees]C. Warmed Newbauer chamber was loaded with a small aliquot of sperm solution. Sperm motility evaluation was performed by the same person throughout the study and was assessed by visual estimation (200 spermatozoa per animal, in duplicate) under a phase-contrast microscope (Leica DMLS) at 200X magnification. Spermatozoa were classified as: immotile, motile without progression and motile with progressive movement. With the aid of a syringe and needle, sperm were removed from the right vas deferens through internal rinsing with 1.0 mL of buffered formalin. Sperm morphology analysis was performed according to Seed et al. (1996) and abnormalities were classified according to Filler (1993).
Right testes were decapsulated and caput/corpus and cauda segments of right epididymis were separated. Homogenization-resistant testicular spermatids (stage 19 of spermiogenesis) and sperm in the caput/corpus epididymis and cauda epididymis were assessed as described previously by Robb, Amann, and Killian (1978), with adaptations of Fernandes et al. (2007). To calculate daily sperm production (DSP) the number of spermatids was divided by 6.1 (number of days that these cells are present in the seminiferous epithelium). The sperm transit time through the epididymis was determined by dividing the number of sperm in each portion by DSP.
Histological procedures and quantitative analysis of spermatogenesis
The left testis and epididymis were collected and fixed in buffered formalin (10%) for 24 hours. After this period, these organs was sectioned and returned to the buffered formalin for additional 24 hours. The pieces were embedded in paraffin wax and sectioned at 5 [micro]g. The sections used for histological evaluation were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and Masson's trichrome and examined by light microscopy.
One hundred random tubular sections per animal (n = 10 animals [group.sup.-1]) in three nonconsecutive testis cross-sections were classified into four categories, according to the type of germ cell present. The groups of stages I-VI (one spermatids generation), VII-VIII (spermatozoa), IXXIII (two generations of spermatids) and XIV (secondary spermatocyte) of the seminiferous epithelium cycle (Leblond & Clemont, 1952) were identified under a light microscope (Leica DMLS) at x 200 magnification.
Nucleus of Sertoli cells and germ cells (spermatogonia type A, pachytene primary spermatocyte and round spermatid) were counted in 20 seminiferous tubules per rat (n = 10 animals [group.sup.-1]) at stage VII of spermatogenesis, under a light microscope (Leica DMLS), at x 400 magnification. The number was corrected for nucleolus/nucleus size and section thickness, according to Abercrombie (1946).
Statistical analyses were conducted by the ANOVA, with a posteriori Tukey test or nonparametric KruskallWallis test, with a posteriori Dunn test, according to the characteristics of each variable. The results were expressed as mean [+ or -] standard deviation (SD) or median and quartile 1 and 3 (Q1/Q3). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Results and discussion
There was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) in the body weight among experimental groups (Table 1) during the treatment period. The feed intake and water consumption were affected by the 3-MCPD-exposure only at the end of the treatment period (data not shown). On the 27 and 30th of exposure, there was an increase (p < 0.05) of the feed intake in the TA group compared to the control group. It was also observed difference (p < 0.05) between the TA and TB groups on the 27th day of treatment. On the 30th day of treatment, there was a lower (p < 0.05) water consumption in the TC group compared to the TA group, but not in relation to other experimental groups.
The absolute and relative weights of reproductive organs, pituitary, liver and kidneys are shown in Table 1. Significant augmentation (p < 0.01) in the absolute weight of the kidneys in rats from TC group in comparison to the control group was observed. However, relative weight of this organ was similar among experimental groups. The weight of the vas deferens was increased (p < 0.05) in TA group, when compare to control group.
Sperm number per gram of testis and daily sperm production per gram of testis were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in TC and TB groups, when compared to control and TA groups, respectively (Table 2). Nevertheless, sperm number in the caput/corpus epididymis, epididymal transit time and sperm morphology were similar among experimental groups (Table 2). The number of sperm with progressive movement was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) so that, consequently, the percentage of immotile sperm was increased (p < 0.05) in the TB and TC groups in relation to control group (Figure 1).
Histopathological analysis of testis and epididymis from rats exposed to 3-MCPD showed that the morphological structures of the seminiferous tubules, interstitial tissue (Leydig cells) and different regions of the caput, corpus and cauda of the epididymis were similar to those of control, indicating the absence of pathological changes (Figure 2).
The stages of spermatogenesis were not significantly affected by different doses of 3-MCPD exposure (Table 3). On the other hand, the number of Sertoli cells and germ cells was lower in the TB and TC groups, when compared to control and TA groups (Table 3).
3-MCPD is a food contaminant found in various foods that are part of daily diet. Experimental studies with adult rodents have shown toxic effects of this compound, especially on the urinary and reproductive systems (Cho et al., 2008, Bakhiya, Abraham, Gurtler, Appel, & Lampen, 2011, Kim et al., 2014). However, the reproductive studies caused by exposure from prepubertal phase, which could have a relevant exposure, are scarce.
Although the levels of exposure to food contaminated by 3-MCPD is not high for the general population, the growing consumption of some foods, such as frozen meals, which have higher levels of the contaminant, raise a concern (Arisseto, Vicente, Furlani, & Toledo, 2013). Furthermore, the presence of this compound in infant formulas and breast milk (Zelinkova et al., 2008, Wohrlin, Fry, Lahrssen-Wiederholt, & PreiB-Weigert, 2015) also indicates the need for further toxicological research in this area.
The assessment of body weight and nutritional status is extremely important to obtain information on the overall health of the animals exposed to chemicals (Clegg, Perreault, & Klinefelter, 2001). The reproduction is often one of the first functions to be affected when there is inadequate nutrition and loss body weight (Krasnow & Steiner, 2006). Thus, the analysis of these parameters is essential to interpretation of the effects of chemicals on the reproductive system. In the current study, final body weight of rats from different experimental groups was similar; corroborating study of Onami et al. (2014).
Similarly food intake also were unaffected by 3MCPD as observed by Yamada, Inoue, Sato, Yamagishi, and Sato (1995). However, Cho et al. (2008) observed decrease in the body weight of adult B6C3F1 mice, only after nine (female) and twelve (male) weeks of exposure to 400 ppm of 3-MCPD (approximately 76.79 mg [kg.sup.-1]). The absence of change in body weight of the animals indicates that the observed reproductive impact is result of the direct action of the 3-MCPD and not a secondary effect of the systemic toxicity.
The kidney is a toxicity target for 3-MCPD (Lynch, Bryant, Hook, Nestmann, & Munro, 1998). The increase of the absolute weight of kidneys observed in TC group is concordant with nephrotoxicity related by several studies (Cho et al., 2008, Sawada et al., 2015). Renal tubular hyperplasia was observed after chronic exposure to 3-MCPD in rats (Hwang, Yoon, Kim, Jang, & Yoo, 2009). Onami et al. (2014) also observed increase in absolute and relative kidney weight after exposure of F344 gpt delta rats to 3-MCPD. After subchronic exposure to 36.97 and 76.79 mg [kg.sup.-1] of 3-MCPD in male mice, Cho et al. (2008) observed increase in relative weight of kidneys. This change was accompanied by interstitial nephritis, basophilic tubules and mineralization of the kidneys, but there was no statistically significant impact. In spite absence of histopathological lesions, proteome alterations associated to metabolic pathways may be found in this organ (Sawada et al. 2015).
As reported by Yamada et al. (1995), weights of reproductive organs were similar in the experimental groups. Kim et al. (2012) also observed no change in reproductive organ weights, with exception of increase in the absolute weight of epididymis (30 mg [kg.sup.-1] be [day.sup.-1] of 3-MCPD for 7 days).
Sperm parameters were impaired by 3-MCPD exposure. Sperm number per gram of testis and daily sperm production per gram of testis were significantly reduced in the rats from groups exposed to higher doses of food contaminant (5 and 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1]). These data corroborate with the reduction of the germ cells number observed. However, Kim et al. (2012) related that the exposure of adult rats (3, 10, and 30 mg [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1] 3-MCPD for 7 days) no caused changes in the number of sperm head in the testis.
The impact on relative sperm production was not changed the cytoarchitecture of seminiferous tubules and the frequencies of different stages of the spermatogenic process. This absence of histological injury also was observed in study of Kwack et al. (2004). These researchers found impairment on fertility and pregnancy outcome, without histopathological changes in testis and epididymis, after paternal exposure to 5 mg [kg.sup.-1] bw of 3-MCPD for four weeks. Despite this, Cho et al. (2008) observed degeneration of the seminiferous epithelium in adult mice after subchronic exposure to higher doses of 36.97 and 76.79 mg [kg.sup.-1] of 3-MCPD.
In the present study, in spite the maintenance of the general morphological characteristics of the testes and absence of evident histological alterations, 3-MCPD exposure affected the number of germ cells per seminiferous tubules. In adult rats, Madhu, Sarkar, Biswas, Behera, and Patra (2011) observed reduction in seminiferous tubular areas, secondary spermatocytes and nuclear diameter of Leydig and Sertoli cells after 45 days of exposure to 1 mg [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1] of 3-MCPD. Moreover, spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes and Sertoli cells increased at 15 and 45 days of exposure. On the other hand, in the current study the number of Sertoli cells was decreased in seminiferous tubules of rats exposed to 5 and 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1] of the food contaminant when compared to control and TA groups. This result suggests that there was cell death and not a reduction of its proliferation, since the exposure began after the end of Sertoli cell proliferation period (Orth, Gunsalos, & Lampert, 1988). The decrease in Sertoli cell number may have triggered the reduction observed in counts of the spermatogonias type A, pachytene primary spermatocytes and round spermatids. This fact might be related to control on spermatogenesis magnitude exercised by Sertoli cell (Hess & Franga, 2005).
In the current study, epididymis histology was no impaired by 3-MCPD, corroborating study of Kwack et al. (2004). On the other hand, Kim et al. (2012) found spermatic granuloma, cell debris, epithelial cell vacuolization and oligospermia in proximal caput epididymis of adult rats after treatment with 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] bw [day.sup.-1] of 3-MCPD for seven days.
Evaluation of sperm morphology by light microscopy indicated no difference among the experimental groups, as related by Kim et al. (2012). Nevertheless, electron microscopy analysis realized by Madhu et al. (2011), revealed sperm abnormalities, including deglutination of the acrosomal part, loss of head capsules, and fragmentation of tail fibrils.
3-MCPD did not affect the transit time through the epididymis; however, sperm motility was reduced, suggesting changes in the sperm maturation process. Several authors also observed impairment in sperm motility of adult rats after 3MCPD exposure at different doses (Kwack et al., 2004, Kim et al., 2012). Decrease in H + ATPase expression in the cauda epididymis (Kwack et al., 2004) and enzymes inhibition of sperm glycoloysis, especially enzymes glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and triosephosphate isomerase (Jones & Porter, 1995, Lynch et al., 1998) have been associated to motility change.
These results show that prepubertal rats exposed to 3-MCPD might present alterations, number of Sertoli and germ cells, relative sperm production and motility, with impact on sperm quality, similar to impairment caused by exposure of adult animals reported in the literature. Since chloropropanols are present in the daily diet of population is essential determining their potential risks to human reproductive health. Thus, additional studies are needed to investigate more deeply the mechanisms involved in these reproductive effects observed and the relationship between the changes in sperm parameters and possible impact on fertility capacity.
Grant support: CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico).
Abercrombie, M. (1946). Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections. The Anatomical Record, 94(2), 239-247.
Arisseto, A. P., Vicente, E., Furlani, R. P. Z., & Toledo, M. C. F. (2013). Estimate of dietary intake of chloropropanols (3-MCPD and 1,3-DCP) and health risk assessment. Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 33(1), 125-133.
Baer, I., De La Calle, B., & Taylor, P. (2010). 3-MCPD in food other than soy sauce or hydrolysed vegetable protein (HVP). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 396(1), 443-456.
Bakhiya, N., Abraham, K., Gurtler, R., Appel, K. E., & Lampen, A. (2011). Toxicological assessment of 3chloropropane-1,2-diol and glycidol fatty acid esters in food. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 33(4), 509-521.
Cho, W. S., Han, B. S., Lee, H., Kim, C., Nam, K. T., Park, K., ... Jang, D. D. (2008). Subchronic toxicity study of 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol administered by drinking water to B6C3F1 mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46(5), 1666-1673.
Clegg, E. (1960). The age at which male rats become fertile. Journal of Reproductive & Fertililty, 1(1), 119-120.
Clegg, E. D., Perreault, S. D., & Klinefelter, G. R. (2001). Assessment of male reproductive toxicology. In H. Wallace (Ed.), Principles and methods of toxicology (4th ed., p. 1263-99). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Crews, C., Brereton, P., & Davies, A. (2001). The effects of domestic cooking on the levels of 3monochloropropanediol in foods. Food Additive and Contaminants, 18(4), 271-280.
Fernandes, G. S., Arena, A. C., Fernandez, C. D., Mercadante, A., Barbisan, L. F., & Kempinas, W. G. (2007). Reproductive effects in male rats exposed to diuron. Reproductive Toxicology, 23(1), 106-112.
Filler, R. (1993). Methods for evaluation of rat epididymal sperm morphology. In R. E. Chapin, & J. H. Heindel (Eds.), Methods in toxicology: Male reproductive toxicology (p. 334-343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Food and Agriculture Organization., & World Health Organization. (2007). Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Genebra, CH: FAO/WHO.
Fu, W. S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Li, J. G., Tang, C. D., Miao, H., ... Wu, Y. N. (2007). Occurrence of chloropropanols in soy sauce and other foods in China between 2002 and 2004. Food Additive and Contaminants, 24(8), 812-819.
Hamlet, C. G., & Sadd, P. A. (2009). Chloropropanols and chloroesters. In R. H. Stadler, & D. R. Lineback (Eds.), Process-Induced food toxicants: occurrence, formation, mitigation, and health risks (p. 175-214). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Hess, R. A, & Franga, L. R. (2005). Structure of the Sertoli cell. In M. K. Skinner, & M. Dgiswold (Eds.), Sertoli cell biology (p. 19-40). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Hwang, M., Yoon, E., Kim, J., Jang, D. D., & Yoo, T. M. (2009). Toxicity value for 3-monochloropropane-1, 2diol using a benchmark dose methodology. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 33(2), 102-106.
Jedrkiewicz, R., Kupska, M., Glowacz, A., Gromadzka, J., & Namiesnik, J. (2016). 3-MCPD: A worldwide problem of food chemistry. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 36(14), 2268-2277.
Johnson, L., Welsh, T. H. J., & Wilker, C. E. (1997). Anatomy and physiology of the male reproductive system and potential targets of toxicants. In K. Boekleheide, R. E. Chapin, P. B. Hoyer, & C. Harris (Eds.), Comprehensive toxicology (p. 5-61). New York City, NK: Pergamon.
Jones, A. R., & Porter, L. M. (1995). Inhibition of glycolysis in boar spermatozoa by alphachlorohydrin phosphate appears to be mediated by phosphatase activity. Reproductive, Fertility and Development, 7(5), 1089-1094.
Kim, S. H., Lee, I. C., Baek, H. S., Moon, C., Bae, C. S., Kim, S. H., ... Kim, J. C. (2014). Ameliorative effects of pine bark extract on spermatotoxicity by achlorohydrin in rats. Phytotherapy Research, 28(3), 451-457.
Kim, S. H., Lee, I. C., Lim, J. H., Moon, C., Bae, C. S., Kim, S. H., ... Kim, J. C. (2012). Spermatotoxic effects of a-chlorohydrin in rats. Laboratory Animal Research, 28(1), 11-16.
Krasnow, S. M., & Steiner, R. A. (2006). Physiological mechanisms integrating metabolism and reproduction. In E. Knobil, & J. D. Neill (Eds.), The physiology of Reproduction (3rd ed., p. 2559-2561). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Kwack, S. J., Kim, S. S., Choi, Y. W., Rhee, G. S., Da Lee, R., Seok, J. H., ... Lee, B. M. (2004). Mechanism of antifertility in male rats treated with 3-monochloro1,2-propanediol (3-MCPD). Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A, 67(23-24), 2001-2011.
Leblond, C. P., & Clemont, Y. (1952). Spermatogenesis of rat, mouse, hamster and guinea pig as revealed by the periodic acid-fuchsinsulfureous acid technique. The American Journal of Anatomy, 90(2), 167-215.
Li, C., Nie, S. P., Zhou, Y. Q., & Xie, M. Y. (2015). Exposure assessment of 3-monochloropropane-1, 2diol esters from edible oils and fats in China. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 75(1), 8-13.
Lynch, B. S., Bryant, D. W., Hook, G. J., Nestmann, E. R., & Munro, I. C. (1998). Carcinogenicity of mo nochloro-1,2-propanediol (a-chloro hydrin, 3 MCPD). International Journal of Toxicology, 17(1), 47-76.
Madhu, N. R., Sarkar, B., Biswas, S. J., Behera, B. K., & Patra, A. (2011). Evaluating the anti-fertility potential of a-chlorohydrin on testis and spermatozoa in the adult male wild Indian house rat (Rattus rattus). Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 30(2), 93-102.
Ojeda, S. R., Andrews, W. W., Advis, J. P., & White, S. S. (1980). Recent advances in the endocrinology of puberty. Endocrine Reviews, 1 (3), 228-257.
Onami, S., Cho, Y. M., Toyoda, T., Horibata, K., Ishii, Y., Umemura, T., ... Ogawa, K. (2014). Absence of in vivo genotoxicity of 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol and associated fatty acid esters in a 4-week comprehensive toxicity study using F344 gpt delta rats. Mutagenesis, 29(4), 295-302.
Orth, J. M., Gunsalos, G. L., & Lampert, A. A. (1988). Evidence from Sertoli cell depleted rats indicates that spermatid number in adults depends on numbers of Sertoli cells produced during perinatal development. Endocrinology, 122(3), 787-794.
Perobelli, J. E. (2014). The male peripubertal phase as a developmental window for reproductive toxicology studies. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20(34), 5398-5415.
Rahn, A. K. K., & Yaylayan, V. A. (2011). What do we know about the molecular mechanism of 3-MCPD ester formation? European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 113(3), 323-329.
Robb, G. W., Amann, R. P., & Killian, G. J. (1978). Daily sperm production and epididymal sperm reserves of pubertal and adult rats. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 54(1), 103-107.
Robjohns, S., Marshall, R., Fellows, M., & Kowalczyk, G. (2003). In vivo genotoxicity studies with 3monochloropropan-1,2-diol. Mutagenesis, 18(5), 401-404.
Sawada, S., Oberemm, A., Buhrke, T., Meckert, C., Rozycki, C., Braeuning, A., & Lampen, A. (2015). Proteomic analysis of 3-MCPD and 3-MCPD dipalmitate toxicity in rat testis. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 83(1), 84-92.
Seed, J., Chapin, R. E., Clegg, E. D., Dostal, L. A., Foote, R. H., Hurtt, M. E., ... Wise, L. D. (1996). Methods for assessing sperm motility, morphology, and counts in the rat, rabbit, and dog: a consensus report. ILSI risk science institute expert working group on sperm evaluation. Reproductive Toxicology, 10(3), 237-244.
Sun, J., Bai, S., Bai, W., Zou, F., Zhang, L., Su, Z., ... Huang, Y. (2013). Toxic mechanisms of 3monochloropropane-1,2-diol on progesterone production in R2C rat Leydig cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(41), 9955-9960.
Wohrlin, F., Fry, H., Lahrssen-Wiederholt, M., & Preiss-Weigert, A. (2015). Occurrence of fatty acid esters of 3-MCPD, 2-MCPD and glycidol in infant formula. Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment, 32(11), 1810-1822.
Yamada, T., Inoue, T., Sato, A., Yamagishi, K., & Sato, M. (1995). Effects of short-term administration of alphachlorohydrin on reproductive toxicity parameters in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 20(3), 195-205.
Zelinkova, Z., Novotny, O., Schurek, J., Velisek, J., Hajslova, J., & Dolezal, M. (2008). Occurrence of 3MCPD fatty acid esters in human breast milk. Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment, 25(6), 669-676.
Zelinkova, Z., Svejkovska, B., Velisek, J., & Dolezal, M. (2006). Fatty acid esters of 3-chloropropane-1,2-diol in edible oils. Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment, 23(12), 1290-1298.
Received on March 14, 2016.
Accepted on March 14, 2017.
Katia Cristina de Melo Tavares Vieira and Ana Paula Alves Favareto *
Programs de Pos-graduacao em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Regional, Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Rodovia Raposo Tavares, km 572, 19067-175, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
* Author for correspondence. E-mail: email@example.com
Caption: Figure 1. Sperm motility of rats from control (C) and exposed to 3-MCPD groups (TA = 2.5, TB = 5, and TC = 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1]). Values expressed as median (Q1 - Q3). Kruskall-Wallis test, with a posteriori Dunn test. Different letters indicate statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Caption: Figure 2. Photomicrographs of testis sections from control (A) and 3-MCPD (2.5 mg [kg.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1] - B) groups and epididymis sections from control (C) and 3-MCPD (5 mg [kg.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1] - D) groups. Observe the absence of pathological changes. 100x. H & E stain.
Table 1. Final body weight and reproductive organ weights of rats from control and treated with 2.5 (TA), 5 (TB) and 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1] (TC) of 3-MCPD groups. Control TB Final body 289.33 [+ or -] 38.99a 317.50 [+ or -] 24.08a weight (g) Absolute weights Testis (g) 1.50 [+ or -] 0.09a 1.57 [+ or -] 0.15a Epididymis (mg) 502.30 [+ or -] 45.30a 536.30 [+ or -] 77.87a Vasdeferens (mg) 111.40 [+ or -] 17.86a 137.70 [+ or -] 29.35bc Ventral 424.10 [+ or -] 131.88a 461.00 [+ or -] 97.07a prostate (mg) Full seminal 663.40 [+ or -] 286.15a 826.50 [+ or -] 167.37a vesicle (g) Empty seminal 389.70 [+ or -] 140.00a 520.20 [+ or -] 46.20a vesicle (mg) Pituitary (mg) 6.00 [+ or -] 1.55a 5.50 [+ or -] 1.12a Liver (g) 11.92 [+ or -] 2.69a 13.07 [+ or -] 1.92a Kidney 1.13 [+ or -] 0.38a 1.38 [+ or -] 0.17ab (right) (g) Kidney 1.23 [+ or -] 0.20a 1.40 [+ or -] 0.17ab (left) (g) Relative weights Testis (g 100 0.52 [+ or -] 0.06a 0.49 [+ or -] 0.04a [g.sup.-1]) Epididymis 57.84 [+ or -] 8.13a 60.09 [+ or -] 7.16a (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Vasdeferens 263.42 [+ or -] 36.35a 241.53 [+ or -] 56.37a (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Ventral prostate 73.99 [+ or -] 21.42a 71.31 [+ or -] 12.49a (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Full seminal 54.72 [+ or -] 29.34a 40.26 [+ or -] 9.89a vesicle (g 100 [g.sup.-1]) Empty seminal 83.87 [+ or -] 31.29a 61.35 [+ or -] 5.45a vesicle (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Pituitary (mg 100 2.10 [+ or -] 0.60a 1.75 [+ or -] 0.40a [g.sup.-1]) Liver (g 100 4.09 [+ or -] 0.55a 4.12 [+ or -] 0.56a [g.sup.-1]) Kidney (right) 0.39 [+ or -] 0.12a 0.44 [+ or -] 0.04a (g 100 [g.sup.-1]) Kidney (left) 0.42 [+ or -] 0.03a 0.44 [+ or -] 0.05a (g 100 [g.sup.-1]) TA TC Final body 306.57 [+ or -] 23.53a 319.76 [+ or -] 18.91a weight (g) Absolute weights Testis (g) 1.58 [+ or -] 0.12a 1.61 [+ or -] 0.12a Epididymis (mg) 495.30 [+ or -] 34.34a 499.78 [+ or -] 50.04a Vasdeferens (mg) 126.10 [+ or -] 10.53ac 112.56 [+ or -] 17.28ac Ventral 432.40 [+ or -] 107.39a 387.33 [+ or -] 79.78a prostate (mg) Full seminal 693.60 [+ or -] 229.15a 618.00 [+ or -] 263.91a vesicle (g) Empty seminal 459.10 [+ or -] 151.44a 371.00 [+ or -] 160.94a vesicle (mg) Pituitary (mg) 4.90 [+ or -] 1.58a 5.89 [+ or -] 2.18a Liver (g) 12.08 [+ or -] 2.21a 13.19 [+ or -] 2.35a Kidney 1.33 [+ or -] 0.14ab 1.52 [+ or -] 0.14bc (right) (g) Kidney 1.30 [+ or -] 0.14ab 1.51 [+ or -] 0.18bc (left) (g) Relative weights Testis (g 100 0.52 [+ or -] 0.05a 0.50 [+ or -] 0.02a [g.sup.-1]) Epididymis 62.10 [+ or -] 5.51a 64.49 [+ or -] 6.23a (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Vasdeferens 244.42 [+ or -] 22.63a 290.92 [+ or -] 48.13a (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Ventral prostate 75.20 [+ or -] 18.01a 85.41 [+ or -] 15.82a (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Full seminal 48.78 [+ or -] 15.17a 49.21 [+ or -] 12.04a vesicle (g 100 [g.sup.-1]) Empty seminal 73.82 [+ or -] 23.50a 82.44 [+ or -] 20.82a vesicle (mg 100 [g.sup.-1]) Pituitary (mg 100 1.60 [+ or -] 0.50a 1.85 [+ or -] 0.71a [g.sup.-1]) Liver (g 100 3.93 [+ or -] 0.58a 4.10 [+ or -] 0.57a [g.sup.-1]) Kidney (right) 0.43 [+ or -] 0.04a 0.47 [+ or -] 0.03a (g 100 [g.sup.-1]) Kidney (left) 0.42 [+ or -] 0.04a 0.47 [+ or -] 0.04a (g 100 [g.sup.-1]) Values expressed as mean [+ or -] S.D. ANOVA with a posteriori Tukey test. Different letters indicate statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Table 2. Sperm parameters of rats from control and treated with 2.5 (TA), 5 (TB) and 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1] (TC) of 3-MCPD groups. Parameter Control TA (a) Sperm counts and epididymal transit Sperm number per 179.24 [+ or -] 23.71a 159.66 [+ or -] 18.83a testis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm number per 144.97 [+ or -] 16.45ac 145.03 [+ or -] 18.08a gram of testis (x [10.sup.6] [g.sup.-1]) Daily sperm 29.38 [+ or -] 3.89a 26.71 [+ or -] 3.09a production (x [10.sup.6] [testis.sup.-1]) Relative daily 23.77 [+ or -] 2.70ac 23.77 [+ or -] 2.96a sperm production (x [10.sup.6] per [g.sup.-1] [testis.sup.-1]) Sperm number in 92.26 [+ or -] 15.01a 92.39 [+ or -] 14.36a the caput/corpus epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm number per 337.57 [+ or -] 22.36a 325.24 [+ or -] 29.13a gram of caput/ corpus epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm transit 3.18 [+ or -] 0.63a 3.55 [+ or -] 0.48a time in the caput/corpus (days) Sperm number in 184.67 [+ or -] 27.62a 205.70 [+ or -] 42.03a the cauda epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm number per 806.25 [+ or -] 30.62a 819.38 [+ or -] 40.01a gram of cauda epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm transit 6.42 [+ or -] 1.45a 7.99 [+ or -] 2.10a time in the cauda (days) (b) Sperm morphology Normal sperm (%) 91.75 (89.50 - 93.25)a 90.00 (86.12 - 94.37) Morphological 5.5 (4.62 - 6.37)a 5.5 (3.87 - 10.12)a abnormalities of the sperm head (%) Morphological 2.00 (1.25 - 3.75)a 3.00 (2.00 - 4.37)a abnormalities of the flagellum (%) TB TC (a) Sperm counts and epididymal transit Sperm number per 166.53 [+ or -] 15.76a 164.48 [+ or -] 13.93a testis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm number per 124.56 [+ or -] 18.80bc 118.79 [+ or -] 12.18b gram of testis (x [10.sup.6] [g.sup.-1]) Daily sperm 27.30 [+ or -] 2.58a 26.96 [+ or -] 2.28a production (x [10.sup.6] [testis.sup.-1]) Relative daily 20.42 [+ or -] 3.08bc 19.47 [+ or -] 2.00b sperm production (x [10.sup.6] per [g.sup.-1] [testis.sup.-1]) Sperm number in 81.08 [+ or -] 13.13a 82.05 [+ or -] 16.10a the caput/corpus epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm number per 330.18 [+ or -] 20.26a 314.30 [+ or -] 18.35a gram of caput/ corpus epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm transit 2.97 [+ or -] 0.37a 3.06 [+ or -] 0.64a time in the caput/corpus (days) Sperm number in 197.06 [+ or -] 26.21a 194.18 [+ or -] 23.68a the cauda epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm number per 787.50 [+ or -] 41.14a 805.56 [+ or -] 45.23a gram of cauda epididymis (x [10.sup.6]) Sperm transit 7.28 [+ or -] 1.17a 7.22 [+ or -] 0.88a time in the cauda (days) (b) Sperm morphology Normal sperm (%) a 92.75 (89.12 - 94.00)a 90 (86.50 - 92.00)a Morphological 5.75 (4.12 - 7.62)a 8.00 (6.00 - 9.50)a abnormalities of the sperm head (%) Morphological 1.50 (1.00 - 2.87)a 2.50 (2.00 - 3.50)a abnormalities of the flagellum (%) (a) Values expressed as mean [+ or -] S.D. ANOVA with a posteriori Tukey test. (b) Values expresses as median (Q1 - Q3). Kruskall-Wallis test, with a posteriori Dunn test. Different letters indicate statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Table 3. Stages of spermatogenesis and Sertoli cells and germ cells number in rats from control and treated with 2.5 (TA), 5 (TB) and 10 mg [kg.sup.-1] [day.sup.-1] (TC) of 3-MCPD groups. Parameter Control TA (a) Stages of spermatogenesis I-VI 46.50 (45.25-47.75)a 45.00 (43.25-46.00)a VII-VIII 26.50 (26.00-27.00)a 25.50 (24.25-26.75)a IX-XIII 22.50 (22.00-24.00)a 24.00 (24.00-25.50)a XIV 3.50 (2.25-5.00)a 5.00 (4.25-5.75)a (b) Cell counts Sertoli cell 11.75 [+ or -] 2.30a 11.60 [+ or -] 2.37a Spermatogonia 9,28 [+ or -] 1,62a 9,22 [+ or -] 1,64a type A Pachytene 48,61 [+ or -] 3,74a 49,03 [+ or -] 2,34a spermatocyte Round spermatid 147,11 [+ or -] 4,33a 148,24 [+ or -] 2,83a Parameter TB TC (a) Stages of spermatogenesis I-VI 46.00 (45.00-46.00)a 46.00 (44.0-47.00)a VII-VIII 26.50 (26.00-27.00)a 26.00 (25.00-26.00)a IX-XIII 23.50 (23.00-24.75)a 24.00 (23.00-24.00)a XIV 4.50 (4.00-5.75)a 5.00 (4.00-6.00)a (b) Cell counts Sertoli cell 10.83 [+ or -] 2.04b 10.49 [+ or -] 1.96b Spermatogonia 8,13 [+ or -] 1,15b 7,60 [+ or -] 1,14b type A Pachytene 45,97 [+ or -] 2,59b 45,31 [+ or -] 2,38b spermatocyte Round spermatid 143,53 [+ or -] 3,84b 142,66 [+ or -] 3,01b (a) Values expressed as median (Q1-Q3).Kruskall-Wanis test, with a posteriori Dunn test. (b) Values expressed as mean [+ or -] S.D. ANOVA with a posteriori Tukey test. Different letters indicate statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Vieira, Katia Cristina de Melo Tavares; Favareto, Ana Paula Alves|
|Publication:||Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences (UEM)|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||Useful woody species and its environmental availability: the case of artisanal fishermen in Itaunas, Brazil/Especies lenhosas uteis e sua...|
|Next Article:||Germination and seedling structure of Ruprechtia laxiflora Meissn. (Polygonaceae)/Germinacao dos diasporos e estrutura das plantulas de Ruprechtia...|