Printer Friendly

Experimental analysis on solar water heater with and without phase change materials.

INTRODUCTION

The energy used in today's world mainly include conventional and non-conventional sources. Since the conventional sources of energy provide more efficient energy, their overuse have created depletion of resources from the earth crust. Non-conventional sources due to their wide availability are therefore used in day to day times. Solar energy is one of the sources that are used widely for domestic applications such as cooking food, distilating water and even for water heating applications. According to the survey conducted by the World Energy Council (2007) and the Energy Saving Trust (2005), the use for solar water heating devices had reached to 105 Giga Watt Thermal (GWTh) and the reduction in electrical energy cost was minimised as they play a major role in the environmental impact by reducing C[O.sub.2] emissions about 0.4- 0.75 tons a year [1]. But due to their certain time dependent characteristics of solar radiation and unsteady condition, the wide use of this solar energy lead to the availability and reliable use of many energy storage devices. In traditional times, solar thermal energy was stored in the form of sensible heat by increasing the temperature of water or rocks for later use [2]. But due to their inefficient storage capabilities, their storage capacities were limited. The main drawback on solar water heating systems is that they have great thermal losses during the night and cold season. Based on these reasons, the solar thermal energy can be stored in another form of energy known as latent heat by using certain specific materials such as Phase Change Materials (PCM's) which can offer high storage capacity per unit volume and per unit mass [3]. PCMs are generally a group of substances that absorb large amounts of heat and releases them, thus maintaining the environmental conditions. By installing PCM as the storage material in the water storage tank, the maximum temperature of the hot water is controlled and the capacity for storing more heat is increased. In addition to the storage capability of the PCM, the temperature of the water in the solar water tank should be at maximum possible level [4]. Encapsulating PCM's are a must as they provide larger heat transfer area, controls the volumetric changes when the expansion takes place and reduces their reactivity to the outer environment [5]. Paraffin was chosen as the PCM due to certain properties such as low cost, congruent melting temperatures, high latent heat storage capacity and also have a phase change temperature of about 56 [degrees]C [6]. Other inorganic compounds such as salt hydrates which are non-ignitable and chemically stable can be used as PCM's. But, when compared to their behaviour with that of Paraffin, the latter is more suitable for domestic applications. Over a past few years, there has been a major experiments conducted on based on the advancements for these type of heating systems. Mehling et al. [7] had applied PCM modules to the upper layers of the water storage tank in the shape of cylindrical reservoirs in order to increase the hot water provision period and also investigated the specific role of the phase change materials in the water storage tank. Tay et al. [8] had developed and experimented the characteristics of a tube in tube tank based on e-NTU which showed the heat exchange effectiveness between the heat transfer fluid and the phase change front. Wang et al. [9] developed a solar water heater with organic solar thermal energy storage material which was able to harness the solar energy and convert them to stored thermal energy during the phase change. Zang [10] had experimented his study on the thermal performance of micro encapsulated phase change material placing it in a rectangular shaped box which resulted in a positive effect on natural convection of heat transfer. Canbazoglu et al. [11] experimented the solar thermal energy storage with sodium thiosulphate pentahydrate as the phase change material which resulted in the accumulation of total heat and production of hot water up to 2.59-3.45 times than a normal conventional solar water heating system. Another study based on numerical analysis for solar water heating systems was carried out by Talmatsy [12], in which he stated that, adding the PCM in the hot storage water tank does not show a much positive reading on the commercial based application systems as the PCM stores less heat than the energy required to maintain the water temperature during the night. With the statement said by Talmatsy, Kousksou [13] had also conducted numerical analysis proving Talmatsy's point of view which resulted that the efficiency of the SWH not only depends on the melting of Phase Change Material but also we have to consider the layout of the heat storage material. Another investigation on the energy storage density for each number of modules was carried out by Cebeza et al. [14] on the effect of sodium acetate trihydrate with graphite in the shape of cylindrical capsules on the water temperature in the solar water heater. Farid et al. investigated the characteristics and capabilities of paraffin wax for various thermal applications and stated that it was most suitable to use them as Phase Change Material.

Experimental Investigations:

The experimental setup consists of a cylindrical water tank within which it holds a container that is filled with the phase change material, a solar collector plate and the collector tubes through which the heat transfer fluid passes. The water tank has a storing capacity to store 50 litres of water which is capable of supplying water for a family of 4 members.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The setup consists of a flat plate collector box of 1.10 m x 0.7 m x 0.038 m though which 6 copper tubes of passes placed at north-south direction with a tilt angle of 35[degrees] based on the geometrical location of Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The collector box is covered with a single glass cover of 0.004m and the absorber tubes are painted black in order to provide maximum heat absorptivity. The storage tank is made up of galvanized iron sheet of 0.001 m thick and is insulated with 0.002 m thick foam tape of very less porosity which acts as a best insulator. The temperature measurement system included implementation of 6 K-type thermocouples with an accuracy of [+ or -]1[degrees]C having a range of 0-150[degrees]C: Two situated on far opposite end sides of the water storage tank, one at the inlet side and the other situated at the outlet of the water storage tank. One thermocouple placed at the center portion of the PCM box, the other placed on the absorber copper coil and the last placed on the glass cover. All these thermocouples where in-turn connected to a digital temperature indicator. The solar radiation was measured using pyranometer. The experiments were conducted during the period from 2nd - 20th March 2016 at the campus of Hindustan University, Chennai. Comparison was made between readings taken using with and without PCM.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

A. Properties of the PCM used in SWH:
Melting area                    55-61 [degrees]C
Congealing area                 61-55 [degrees]C
Heat storage capacity           160 kJ/kg
Specific heat capacity          2 kJ/kgK
Volumetric expansion            12.5%
Maximum operating temperature   80 [degrees]C


B. Experimental principle:

The solar water heater works on thermosiphon principle in which during the heat absorption process, by convection, the heated liquid is moved in the system and is simultaneously replaced by cooler liquid which returns by gravitational force. In order for the thermosiphon principle to take place the liquid should have a very little hydraulic resistance. The relative height that separates the tank and the collector influences the thermosiphon principle. The solar collector heats the water in the riser tubes which in turn rises to heat the water in the storage tank whereas the denser cold water flows down.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The comparative temperature readings of water was taken with PCM and without PCM
Table 1: Charging without PCM.

Charging without Phase Change Material

Time (hr)   Temperature of    Temperature of
                 water             coil
             ([degrees]C)      ([degrees]C)

8:00              38                42
9:00              41                44
10:00             45                51
11:00             53                62
12:00             57                66
13:00             61                69
14:00             58                64
15:00             54                58
16:00             50                53
17:00             45                48
18:00             43                44

Table 2: Charging with PCM.

Charging with Phase Change Material

Time (hr)   Temperature of    Temperature of
                 water              PCM
             ([degrees]C)      ([degrees]C)

8:00              43                45
9:00              45                48
10:00             48                50
11:00             52                54
12:00             57                59
13:00             60                63
14:00             58                61
15:00             57                59
16:00             56                57
17:00             55                56
18:00             53                54


[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Figure 4 shows the comparison with the two readings; i.e. using the phase change material and without using it, which are based on the charging and discharging process of the solar water heater. According to the graph, it's been found that during the charging process, both the values attain a peak point. But during the discharging process, the temperature reduces more in the case where the PCM is not used compared to using it.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Figure 5 shows the variation of water temperature in the water storage tank in the both cases where the PCM is used and also not used. It's been found that the temperature of the water will be maintained hot even a longer time when used with PCM, as they releases the heat stored within them to the surrounding water during the discharging process which is what actually is required.

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Figure 6 shows the variation of graphs in the two cases where the PCM is used and not used. It is found that the energy stored by the PCM is more than compared to the case where it's not used.

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

Figure 7 shows the variation of graphs with respect to the energy stored at the both cases where PCM is used and not used. It's been found that during the discharging process, the energy liberated is more in the case where PCM is not used rather when it is used. It can be also said that, the cooling rate of water is less when the PCM is used compared when it is not used.

Conclusion:

Solar water heating systems always play an important role worldwide providing sustainable energy management. Thus, the main objective of this experimentation was to find out how to improve the performance of solar water heating systems by applying heat storing materials. It was found that there was a good improvement upon using paraffin wax as the phase change material which acted as the heat storage medium. The study resulted in the reduction in the cooling rate of water during evening hours and increase in overall performance of the SWH with the existence of phase change material.

II. Future Scope:

In future stage, it's been planned to increase the efficiency of the solar water heater by using nano-fluids in place of the heat transfer fluid which thus helps in regaining the collector efficiency.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We would like to thank Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Chennai, India, for providing facilities to conduct the experiments and every others who had helped us directly and indirectly for this project.

REFERENCES

[1.] Razali Thaib, Hamdani, Irwansyah and Zaini, 2014. Investigation performance of solar water heater system using paraffin wax. ARPNjournal of engineering and applied sciences, 9-1.

[2.] Al- Hinti, A., Al-Ghandoor, A. Maaly, I. Abu Naqeera, Z. Al-Khateeb, O. Al-Sheikh, 2010. Experimental investigation on the use of water-phase change material storage in conventional solar water heating systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 51: 1735-1740.

[3.] Dincer, I., 1999. Evaluation and selection of energy storage systems for solar thermal applications. International journal of Energy Research, 23:1017-28.

[4.] Mohammad Ali Fazilati, Ali Akbar Alemrajabi, 2013. Phase change material for enhancing solar water heater, an experimental approach. Energy conversion and management, 71: 138-145.

[5.] Farid, M.M., A.M. Khudhair, S.A.K. Razack, S. Al- Hallaj, 2004. A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications. Energy conversion and management, 1597-615.

[6.] Salwa Bouadila, Mehdi Fteiti, Mohamed Mehdi Oueslati, Amenallah Guizani, Abdelhamid Farhat, 2014. Enhancement of latent heat storage in a rectangular cavity: Solar water heater case study. Energy conversion and management, 78: 904-912.

[7.] Mehling, H., L.F. Cabeza, S. Hippeli, S. Hiebler, 2003. PCM- Module to improve hot water heat stores with stratification. Renewable Energy, 28: 699-711.

[8.] Tay, N.H.S., M. Belusko, F. Bruno, 2012. An effectiveness- NTU technique for characterising tube in tank phase change thermal energy storage systems. Applied Energy, 91: 309-19.

[9.] Wang, Y., B. Tang, S. Zhang, 2012. Novel organic solar thermal energy storage materials: efficient visible light driven reversible solid -liquid phase transition. JMater Chem., 22:18145-50.

[10.] Zhang, Y., Z. Rao, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, X. Li, 2012. Experimental evaluation on natural convection heat transfer of micro- encapsulated phase change materials slurry in a rectangular heat storage tank. Energy conservation and Management, 59: 33-9.

[11.] Canbazoglu, S., A. Sahinaslan, A. Ekmekyapar, Y.G. Aksoy, F. Akarsu, 2005. Enhancement of solar thermal energy storage performance using sodium thiosulphate pentahydrate of a conventional solar water heating system. Energy Build, 37: 235-42.

[12.] Talmatsky, E., A. Kribus, 2008. PCM storage for solar DHW: an unfulfilled promise. Solar Energy, 82: 861-869.

[13.] Kousksou, T., P. Bruel, G. Cherreau, V. Leoussoff and T. El Rhafiki, 2010. PCM storage DHW: from an unfulfilled promise to a real benefit, 9th International Conference on phase change materials and slurries for refrigeration and air conditioning, Sofia, Bulgaria.

[14.] Cabeza, L.F., M. Ibanez, C. Sole, J. Roca, M. Nogues, 2006. Experimentation with a water tank including a PCM module. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 90: 1273-82.

(1) Bonskey Samson Samuel and (2) Shaik Mohhamed Shafee

(1) PG, Department of mechanical engineering Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science Chennai, India

(2) Associate Professor, Department of mechanical engineering Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science Chennai, India

Received 25 April 2016; Accepted 28 May 2016; Available 5 June 2016

Address For Correspondence: Bonskey Samson Samuel PG, Department of mechanical engineering Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science Chennai, India

E-mail: boney2mail@gmail.com
COPYRIGHT 2016 American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Samuel, Bonskey Samson; Shafee, Shaik Mohhamed
Publication:Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences
Date:Jun 15, 2016
Words:2390
Previous Article:Experimental study on self curing concrete with and without polypropylene fibre.
Next Article:Phase disposition PWM multicarrier based 5 level Modular Multilevel Inverter for PV applications.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters