Printer Friendly

Evolution of Acoustical, Geometrical, Physical, and Mechanical Parameters from Seedling to Cutting Age in Eucalyptus Clones Used in the Pulp and Paper Industries in Brazil.

The quality of the raw materials evaluated in the forest will determine the future of the forest industry. The increased competitiveness of the timber sector will be dependent on technological modernization, which will allow for the evaluation of wood quality from standing trees. Better estimates of this characterization will lead to greater gains in productivity and quality.

The effectiveness of wave propagation techniques for the selection of wood according to the stiffness has been evaluated by many authors, who have applied these techniques to standing trees and freshly felled logs (Grabianowski et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2007a, 2007b; Goncalves et al. 2011, 2013; Lenz et al. 2013; Sharma et al. 2016). In the more advanced programs of genetic improvement, the velocity of wave propagation obtained in measurements in standing trees has been considered efficient for the selection of trees by stiffness (Lindstrom et al. 2002, Gapare et al. 2009) and the determination of juvenile wood quality (Wielinga et al. 2009). According to Apiolaza et al. (2013), for structural uses, selecting wood early on the basis of stiffness is more appropriate than selecting on the basis of density.

However, any parameter included in this type of analysis, especially in young trees, requires knowledge of the parameter's behavior during tree growth or its ability to propagate with age. In this sense, results in the literature have indicated that the acoustic wave propagation velocity increases with age, especially until the transition period from juvenile to adult wood (Grabianowski et al. 2006, Innes 2007, Goncalves et al. 2012). The results of these surveys (Thomas et al. 2009, Gongalves et al. 2013) indicate a positive trend between an increase in age and an increase in bending properties (strength and stiffness). Apiolaza et al. (2013) did not use seedlings and instead started their research in young trees (2 yr), which is closer to the objective of this research, and they indicated that foresters believed that tree selection would be performed at approximately 10 years old to provide accurate results. However, the authors (Apiolaza et al. 2013) commented that tree selection should be performed at 2 years old because for conifers, the microfibril angle (MFA) decreases from 50[degrees] to 30[degrees] in the first 2 years. Huang et al. (2003) also indicated that 2-year-old trees could be analyzed by nondestructive methods and suggested that trees with a MFA > 35[degrees] could be used to predict a low quality of wood in the future. The early selection of conifer and hardwood trees with wood with smaller MFA indicates a better quality of wood in the future (Apiolaza et al. 2013).

The basic density of wood was the first variable used as a parameter for the selection of wood quality in genetic improvement programs almost 30 years ago (Merlo et al. 2008, Santaclara et al. 2011) because it is highly correlated with other properties of interest and presents a high degree of genetic propagation (Merlo et al. 2008, Santaclara et al. 2011). Padua (2006) reported on different parameters of quality selection and included density because of its inheritance and correlations with several properties. Apiolaza (2009) suggested that the correlation between the basic density of juvenile and adult wood makes it an important parameter for early selection in genetic improvement programs. In certain conifers, the genetic correlation (R) between the density measured at 3 years old and the final density is 0.83, and this value increases to 0.96 using the 10th growth ring (Kumar et al. 2002). This result shows that this parameter can be used to select trees for future quality.

The basic density usually increases abruptly in the juvenile period, more slowly during the transition period, and remains more or less constant at maturity. However, researchers have obtained another pattern in which uniform variation occurs, with the density increasing or decreasing over the life of the tree or decreasing during the juvenile period and then increasing at maturity (Haygreen and Bowyer 1982, Lorensani et al. 2015). These discrepant results show that density does not present a definite or consolidated pattern of variations with tree growth.

The height of trees and their diameter at breast height (DBH) present a gradual increase with age and are influenced by several factors, such as the spacing between individuals (Simoes et al. 1980, Alves Ferreira et al. 2014), geographic localization (Bhat et al. 1987), and clonal differences (Neves et al. 2013), thus demonstrating the high sensitivity of these traits to changes in the environment.

Although a large number of studies have been conducted on the progression of mechanical properties with age, few authors have analyzed several parameters in the same study and initiated the investigations at such young ages as those used in this research. Considering the aforementioned aspects and the goal of estimating wood selection, the objective of this research was to verify whether seedlings should be judged on the basis of diameter, height, basic density, strength, or stiffness tension and determine whether the velocity of ultrasonic wave propagation remains consistent with tree growth until 6 years of age (cutting age used by the pulp and paper companies in Brazil).

Materials and Methods

Material

The samples in this study were composed of three clones: A, B, and C (Table 1). The number of nursery seedlings and trees at each age was determined according to the availability and logistics of the company that was the partner in this research (International Paper). For all clones, nursery seedlings at 3 months old could be obtained, whereas the available ages of trees were 12, 24, 48, and 72 months.

Clone C was randomly adopted from the beginning of the research as validation material, and its tests were performed only in the nursery seedlings (3 mo old) and in trees at the cutting age (72 mo old). From each site and each age, 30 trees were chosen randomly, and trees at the edge were avoided because they were more likely to contain reaction wood. All seedlings and trees (Table 1) were submitted to ultrasonic and tension tests as well as basic density calculations and diameter and height measurements. After the ultrasound tests, the 30 trees from each site were graded using the following tree groups for ultrasonic velocity: extreme velocities (major and minor) and intermediate velocities. From each group, at least two trees were chosen to compose the sample of trees to be cut to obtain logs for the static bending tests (Table 1).

For density determination, specimens from 30 to 50 mm long were obtained from the seedling stems, which were approximately 150 mm long, and these samples were used for the basic density determination. In the case of the trees, an increment borer was used at breast height to obtain cylindrical samples that were 6 mm in diameter. Each sample was packed in a plastic bag and refrigerated to maintain moisture for subsequent laboratory measurements.

The trees from the three clones at different ages were planted in different sites of the company. All sites presented the same type of soil and altitude, and the average annual temperatures and average annual precipitation were similar (Table 2). The altitude presented the greatest variation among the sites (coefficient of variation [CV] of 9% for clone A and 5% for clone B; Table 1). However, according to Kiaei and Samariha (2011) and Topaloglu et al. (2016), in the range of altitudes from 610 to 750 m, property variations should not occur.

Experimental procedures

Measurements of height and diameter.--To measure the height of the nursery seedlings, the stem was considered to extend from the ground level to its extremities in the region where budding occurred, with extreme leaves disregarded. The diameter was measured at the ground level.

For the trees (from 12 mo onward), the height was measured with a hypsometer (Vertex IV; Haglof, Switzerland).

The diameter of the nursery seedlings was measured at the ground line, whereas the DBH was measured at 1.30 m from the ground using calipers.

Ultrasound testing.--Ultrasound equipment (USLab; Agricef, Brazil) with 45-kHz-frequency exponential transducer tips were used in the tests. The transducer tips are interchangeable, thus allowing the seedlings tests to be performed with needle tips and the tree tests with 3-mm rounded tips. The needle tips were designed and manufactured by the research group.

For the test in the nursery seedlings, a wooden support was constructed to position the probes within a distance of 150 mm for all measurements. The distance between the probes (wave propagation length) was previously established to include at least three wavelengths ([lambda] = velocity of wave propagation/transducer frequency), and wave disturbance was avoided. The seedlings were tested indirectly by ultrasound, with the transducers positioned at 45[degrees] from the stem axis (Fig. 1a). The indirect test allowed the nursery seedlings to be tested alive, and this methodology was also applied for the trees.

As in the case of nursery seedlings, the ultrasound test on trees was performed indirectly, with the transducers positioned at 45[degrees] from the trunk axis (Fig. 1b). In trees, the distance between the transducers was 0.7 m, and they were located 0.35 m above and below the breast height (1.3 m from the ground line). The ultrasound test on each tree was repeated on two opposite sides of the trunk.

The wave propagation time and distance between the transducers were used to calculate the velocities for both the nursery seedlings and trees (sample detailed in Table 1).

Strength and stiffness.--In the case of the 3-month-old seedlings, the strength and stiffness were determined using the sample detailed in Table 1 via the tension parallel to the fiber test, which was performed using a universal machine (DL30000, EMIC, Brazil; Fig. 2a). The seedlings were clamped using tensile test strips. As there are no standards for this specific test, the loading rate used was that proposed in the Brazilian Standard (Associacao Brasiliera de Normas Tecnicas [ABNT] 1997) tension test in small and clear wood specimens (10 MPa/min). The load and the deformation were obtained simultaneously by the software of the machine that receives the signals from the load cell and the extensometer.

In trees, strength and stiffness were obtained using the log samples detailed in Table 1 via static bending tests in 3.5-m-length saturated base logs. The tests were performed on a servo-hydraulic load frame using an eight-channel data acquisition system (Quantun; HBM, Germany) in which the load cell and the electronic linear position transducer with 0.001-mm resolution (PC-M-0300; Gefran, Italy) were coupled, thus allowing for the automatic reading of load and vertical displacement during the test. The application of the load (two symmetrical points) was performed according to the European standard EN 408 (European Committee for Standardization [CEN] 2010; Fig. 2b).

Brazilian standard (ABNT 1997) equations used in the specimen tension tests (Eqs. 1 and 2) were also used to determine the strength ([f.sub.t]) and modulus of elasticity ([E.sub.t]) of the seedling stems in tension.

[f.sub.t] = [[F.sub.t,max]/A] (1)

where [F.sub.t,max] is the maximum load applied during the test and A is the transversal section area at the central part of the stem.

[f.sub.t] = [[[[sigma].sub.50%] - [[sigma].sub.10%]]/[[[epsilon].sub.50%] - [[epsilon].sub.10%]]] (2)

where [[sigma].sub.10%] and [[sigma].sub.50%] are the tension stresses corresponding to 10 and 50 percent of the tension strength, respectively, and [[epsilon].sub.10%] and [[epsilon].sub.50%] are the specific strains measured on the central part of the stem corresponding to ([[sigma].sub.10%] and [[sigma].sub.50%], respectively.

For the static bending tests on the tree logs, the modulus of elasticity ([E.sub.M]) was calculated using Equation 3 (global modulus from EN 408; CEN 2010), with the shear modulus (G) considered an infinite value (simplification allowed by EN 408; CEN 2010).

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (3)

where [P.sub.40%] and [P.sub.10%] are 40 and 10 percent of the maximum load applied to the log during the bending tests, respectively; [f.sub.40%] and [f.sub.10%] are the vertical displacements corresponding to the loads [P.sub.40%] and [P.sub.10%], respectively; L is the span; a is L/3; I is the inertia of round timber and the value is [[pi][D.sup.4]/64]; and D is the diameter of the cross-section of the log at the center point under the bark.

The bending strength was also calculated according to EN 408 (CEN 2010) using Equation 4.

[f.sub.m] = [[3[F.sub.max]a]/[[bh.sup.2]]] = [[3[F.sub.max]a]/[AD]] (4)

where [f.sub.M] is the bending strength, [F.sub.max] is the maximum load (N), D is the diameter of the cross-section of the log at the center point under the bark, and A represents the transversal section area of the round timber and the value is [[pi][D.sup.2]/4].

Basic density.--The volume of the specimens (from seedlings and trees) was obtained in the saturated condition, and then the specimens were dried in an oven at 103[degrees]C [+ or -] 2[degrees]C until a constant mass was achieved (ovendry condition), and the weights were then determined. The ovendry mass and saturated volume were used to determine the basic density (Eq. 5).

BD = [[m.sub.s]/[V.sub.s]] (5)

where BD is the basic wood density, [m.sub.s] is the ovendry mass (103[degrees]C [+ or -] 2[degrees]C), and [V.sub.s] is the saturated volume of the specimen.

Nondestructive techniques can be used to determine the wood density directly from trees because the trees do not need to be cut to remove discs for evaluation in the laboratory; thus, these techniques are more economical and agile. In addition to the increment borer method, studies have also reported the use of penetration resistance (Pilodyn) and drilling resistance (Resistograph; Isik and Li 2003, Padua 2006, Lima et al. 2007, Couto et al. 2013, Sotomayor 2013). Downes et al. (1993), who were cited by Padua (2006), stated that density determined using a single tree disk consumes five times as much time and is five times more expensive than the density obtained using a motorized increment borer. Downes et al. (1993; cited by Padua 2006) warned that seven trees would be required to obtain the same accuracy as the motorized increment borer. In this research, 30 trees of each clone and each age were used to calculate the density (Table 1).

Data analysis.--First, the parameters (diameter, height, velocity, strength, stiffness, and basic density) were analyzed for normality to verify the feasibility of applying parametric analyses.

For each parameter, the central tendency (average data) and its deviation were summarized. Additionally, for each parameter, the statistical differences in the ages for the same clone and among clones were verified. To statistically test the differences among ages, we used a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the parameter under analysis the dependent variable and age the independent factor (five levels: 3, 12, 24, 48, and 72 mo old). On the basis of this procedure, the software constructs different tests to compare the mean values of the parameter for the five different levels (ages). The F test in the ANOVA table tests whether significant differences occur among the means, and the multiple range test is used to determine the means that are significantly different from the others. To test for differences among the clones, we compared the means using two tests: 95% CI for the mean and the t test.

Finally, the actual average values in each age were subjected to a regression analysis (parameters under analysis by age) to verify the behavior of the parameter over time. The regression models were also used to analyze whether the differences among clones observed in the nursery seedlings were maintained until the cutting age.

Results and Discussion

Diameter and height

The rates of increase in the diameter and height are dependent on the site (Alves Ferreira et al. 2014) and species. Downes et al. (1993) found a 1.24-m average height increment for fast-growing Pinus radiata from 13 to 24 months of age. Even for clones, the CV of the diameter (from 7.2% to 16.1%) and height (from 2.6% to 14.9%) were high (Table 3). These values were higher than the ranges obtained by Simoes et al. (1980) and Neves et al. (2013), whose studies considered trees growing in the same sites. Similar to this research, Bhat et al. (1987) tested trees from different ages planted (DAP) in different sites and obtained CV values (13% to 21% for height and 19% to 27% for DAP) that were higher than those obtained by Simoes et al. (1980) and Neves et al. (2013).

The rate of increase in diameter from 12 to 72 months of age was higher for clone A (3.23%/mo) than for clone B (1.8%/mo). Alves Ferreira et al. (2014) obtained an intermediate value for a Eucalyptus urophylla x E. grandis clone (2.03%/mo) on the basis of close spacing (3.0 by 2.5 m for Alves Ferreira et al. [2014] and 3.0 by 3.0 m in this research). Ikeda et al. (2015) showed large differences in diameter with age (60% by year and 19% by year) in Japanese cedar trees grown at different sites. As expected, the seedling growth from 3 to 9 months of age was much more significant than the tree growth for both clones and was higher for clone B (161%/mo) than for clone A (144%/mo).

The diameter presented significant differences at all ages in both clones (Table 3), and significant differences between clones were also observed at different ages (Table 3). Clone B was significantly different from clones A and C and presented a larger average diameter. At the cutting age, the three clones differed statistically; however, an inversion was then observed, with clone A presenting the largest average diameter (Table 3).

The rate of increase in height was greater for clone A (4.48%/mo) than for clone B (2.52%/mo) in the trees from 12 to 72 months of age, although the results were reversed for the rate of increase in height of seedlings from 3 to 12 months old (212%/mo for clone B and 139%/mo for clone A). As for diameter growth, Alves Ferreira (2014) obtained intermediate values (3.7%/mo) for clones from 3 to 6 years of age. Ikeda et al. (2015) showed large differences in height with age (33% by year and 16% by year) in Japanese cedar trees grown at different sites.

Significant differences in height were observed for all ages and clones, although differences among the clones were not observed for all ages (Table 3). In addition, differences in the nursery seedlings were not significant, although over time, the order of the differences was not maintained, with an inversion occurring at 72 months (Table 3).

The behavior of height with age and diameter with age can be statistically represented by the S-curve model (Figs. 3 and 4). On the basis of the regression models, the clones presented differences in diameter and height at 12 months of age.

As previously discussed, the values reported here are the averages among the trees and do not represent values reported in the same trees at different ages, which might explain the variation observed between the actual behavior and the model results, particularly for the height, diameter, strength and [E.sub.M]. This aspect of our study design represents a source of error, and if the same plants were tested during growth, the model would likely fit better with the actual results. However, such a process would extend the time of the research. Another source of error was related to the different edaphoclimatic conditions of the sites for the clones planted at different times. Although the differences among sites were not significant, as previously discussed, certain parameters might have been more affected than others by the sites. Although the ideal conditions for the research are known, the ideal conditions must be adjusted to actual conditions provided by the partner company.

Density

The CV of the basic densities varied from 3.8 to 17.8 percent for the different clones at the different ages of measurement (Table 3). These values were within the ranges reported in the literature (Downes et al. 1993, Padua 2006, Stackpole et al. 2011, Sharma et al. 2016). Similar to the case of strength and stiffness, the highest CV values for the basic density were found for the nursery seedlings.

The basic density is expected to increase with age, although this parameter is variable within and between trees up to 3 years of age (Raymond 2002 in Padua et al. 2006). Different studies using Eucalyptus obtained incompatible results concerning the density variation with age, with certain authors indicating that density decreased with age (Ferreira 1972, Padua et al. 2006), increased with age (Sturion et al. 1987, Shimoyama and Barrichelo 1991), initially increased and then decreased with age (Manfredi 1985, Purnell 1988, Wilkins and Home 1991, Lima et al. 1992, Lausberg et al. 1995, Gominho et al. 2001, McKenzie et al. 2003, Alzate et al. 2005, Oliveira et al. 2005), initially decreased and then increased with age (Brasil et al. 1977, Rosado 1982, Oliveira et al. 2006), and showed no variation with age (Teixeira and Vargas Filho 1994).

The multiple-comparison test indicated that the basic densities of clone A at 3 and 12 months old were significantly different, and the values were also different from the densities at the other ages (Table 3); however, only the density of clone B at 3 months presented variations from the density at other ages (Table 3).

Similar to the strength and stiffness, age-density variations can be statistically represented by a double reciprocal model (Fig. 5). Numerically, both the experimental data and those obtained by the regression model indicate that the densities at 3 months (seedling) and 12 months (tree) were not consistent with the density at the cutting age (Fig. 5). After 24 months, clone A presented higher density than clone B until the cutting age. Wu et al. (2007) used two mature genetic trials of P. radiata planted in two different sites (A and B) with thinning (one with no thinning and the other thinned three times). Using only the trend of wood density from 1 to 28 years of age (not a statistical analysis), Wu et al. (2007) showed that the density of wood from the A and B sites was equal at 1 year, the wood density from site A was slightly greater than that of site B from 2 to 5 years, the wood density from site B was greater than that from site A from 6 to 13 years, but the wood density from site A was again greater than that of site B from 14 years until the final age of analysis (28 yr of age).

Ultrasound

The CV of the velocities ranged from 5.9 to 16.7 percent for the different clones at different measurement ages (Table 4). These values were compatible with those referenced in the literature (Wang et al. 2007a; Emms et al. 2012; Chauhan et al. 2013; Goncalves et al. 2011, 2013; Sharma et al. 2016), which reported CV values from 1.0 to 17 percent.

Direct comparisons of the velocity values of trees obtained by different authors should be performed with caution because this parameter varies with the species and growth conditions. However, the mean values in trees at different ages (from 2,697 to 4,654 m [s.sup.-1]) obtained in this work (Table 4) show the same order of magnitude as those obtained by different authors (Grabianowski et al. 2006; Johnson and Gartner 2006; Wang et al. 2007a, 2007b; Cherry et al. 2008; Moore and Lyon 2008; Santaclara 2010; Apiolaza et al. 2011, 2013; Goncalves et al. 2011; Vikran et al. 2011; Merlo and Santaclara 2012; Sharma et al. 2016), who obtained velocities varying from 1,260 to 4,800 m [s.sup.-1] in trees with ages close to those analyzed in this study. These results indicate that for both the CV and velocity, the values reported here are consistent with those obtained in the literature.

The velocity is expected to increase with the age of the tree until maturity. The maturity of the tree depends on the species, although it generally occurs above 6 years of age, which was the maximum age evaluated in this research. For Pinus elliotti, Goncalves et al. (2012) reported a growth of approximately 50 percent in the wave propagation velocity in trees from 8 to 15 years old, whereas this growth was only 3 percent in trees from 15 to 23 years old. For Pinus taeda, Ballarin and Lara Palma (2003) concluded that juvenile wood was present up to the 14th ring. In this study (Table 4), the velocity growth from the nursery seedling age (3 mo) to the trees at cutting age (72 mo) was similar for the three clones (107% for clone A, 88% for clone B, and 89% for clone C). In clones A and B, we obtained velocities at different ages, and the results indicated that the average velocity (obtained at each age) increased linearly with age (Fig. 6) and the velocity order of magnitude obtained at the seedling age (velocities in clones, B < A) was consistent with that at the cutting age (Table 4). The slope of the linear regression model (Fig. 6) showed that variations in velocity with age in clone A were approximately 6 percent higher than that of clone B. Ikeda et al. (2015) performed tests on Japanese cedar trees grown in different sites and found a 25 percent increase in stress-wave velocity propagation measured |from 2 to 6 years of age and a 14 percent increase in trees measured from 4 to 7 years of age.

A statistical analysis using all the data obtained at each age (Table 1) instead of just the average values (Table 4) showed that the velocities not only increased but were significantly different at different ages (Table 4). Moreover, for clones A and B, the velocities obtained at the same age were significantly different in all age ranges (Table 4), indicating the potential of the tool to differentiate properties among clones.

The nursery seedlings of clones B and C presented statistically equivalent velocities, which were both lower (on average by 9%) than that of clone A (Table 4). This same behavior was repeated at the cutting age (Table 4), although at this age, the difference increased to approximately 20 percent, showing that the grading of nursery seedling clones by velocities remained until the cutting age. This same result was obtained by analyzing the velocities in clones A and B at 12, 24, and 48 months, which showed that at these ages, the clones could also be graded by velocity.

Although it was not the focus of this research, Huang et al. (2003) noted that positive and statistically significant correlations (R = 0.92) occurred between wave propagation velocity and fiber length. Because fiber length is an important parameter for paper and pulp companies, the early screening of clones by velocity may also be interesting for estimating fiber length.

Strength and stiffness

The variability in the strength and stiffness, which was measured by the CV (Table 4), was high for the seedlings. At other ages, the CV was within the order of magnitude observed in the literature for Eucalyptus roundwood, although the trees were older (McKinley et al. 2002, Christoforo et al. 2011, Ziangiacomo et al. 2013, Ruy 2016). For other species and purposes, Zhu et al. (2012) also performed tests on young plants (2 mo old) and obtained the tension strength (20 [+ or -] 9 MPa and 17 [+ or -] 6 MPa) for two species with the same order of magnitude as those obtained in this study (19.8 [+ or -] 1.86 for clone A and 33.2 [+ or -] 12.5 for clone B) but with greater variability. Zhu et al. (2012) commented that the variability is generally high in young plants for all properties, including the MFA and density. Downes et al. (1993) obtained lower stiffness values (mean [E.sub.M] = 530 MPa) and similar strength values (mean [f.sub.m] = 15 MPa) on logs of 2-year-old P. radiata using the same methodology in roundwood bending tests. The CVs of [E.sub.M] and [f.sub.m] obtained by Downes et al. (1993) were inferior (mean 11% and 6.5%, respectively) to the ones obtained in this research (Table 4).

Despite the oscillations observed in the average properties at 24, 48, and 72 months, the increased strength and stiffness with age (Table 4) can be statistically represented by a double reciprocal model (Figs. 7 and 8). In general, the mean mechanical properties obtained in the tests decreased at 72 months (Table 4), which was not expected. However, the values represent the average and do not represent the values obtained in the same trees at different ages. Thus, this behavior suggests that the mechanical parameters of the clones presented limited changes with age in this period (24, 48, and 72 mo).

Moreover, the significant differences in the strength and stiffness of the nursery seedlings ([f.sub.m]: A = C < B and [E.sub.M]: A = B > C in Table 4) were not maintained until the cutting age, at which all clones presented similar values (Table 4). However, the regression model of the mechanical properties (Figs. 7 and 8) showed that after 12 months, the differences in these values between clones A and B (A > B) were maintained up to cutting age. This result indicates that differences in the mechanical properties between these clones at 12 or 24 months could be estimated, which represents a significant finding for forest companies.

Wu et al. (2007) used two mature genetic trials of P. radiata planted in two very different sites (named here A and B) and performed thinning (one with no thinning and the other thinned three times). Using only the trend of the [E.sub.M] from 1 to 28 years of age (not a statistical analysis), Wu et al. (2007) showed that wood from site B had a greater [E.sub.M] from 1 to 13 years of age. Wu et al. (2007) showed that the data from 14 to 28 years of age presented an inversion trend, with site A presenting wood stiffness slightly greater than that of site B.

Conclusions

In this work, changes in certain wood properties that occur from the seedling to cutting age were analyzed to determine whether these properties can be used to estimate the future quality of clones. The results indicate that the ultrasound wave propagation velocity can be used to distinguish the clones at the nursery seedling age and the differentiation order is coherently maintained up to the cutting age. The ultrasound wave velocity was used as a tool to grade clones at 12 or 24 months old and presents the same behavior, thus indicating that clones could be differentiated by acoustic methods at these ages.

The age-related mechanical properties indicated that after 12 months of age, the distinction between the clones was maintained, showing that the quality could be estimated at 12 or 24 months of age, which is a significant finding for forestry companies.

The age-related density was consistent with the statistical regression model for age-related mechanical properties after 24 months of age, with the differentiation among the clones maintained from this age up to the cutting age.

The age-related height and diameter were represented by the same statistical regression model, and the clones could be differentiated at 12 months of age.

In general, the results indicate that all parameters have the potential to be used in a predictive model to estimate the quality of clones, although the predictive value of the parameters varies.

Literature Cited

Alves Ferreira, D. H. A., P. S. S. Feles, E. C. Machado, A. H. M. Abreu, and F. M. Abilio. 2014. Crescimento de clone de Eucalyptus urophylla x E. Grandis em diferentes espacamentos. Floresta. 44(3):431-440.

Alzate. S. B. A., M. Tomazello Filho, S. M. S. Piedade. 2005. Variacao longitudinal da densidade basica da madeira de clones de Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden, E. saligna Sm. e E. grandis x urophylla. Sci. Forestalls. Piracicaba 68:87-95.

Apiolaza, L. A. 2009. Very early selection for solid wood quality: Screening for early winners. Ann. Forest Sci. 66:601.

Apiolaza, L. A., B. Butterfield, S. Chauhan, and J. C. F. Walker. 2011. Characterization of mechanically perturbed young stems: Can it be used for wood quality screening. Ann. Forest Sci. 68(2):407-414. DOI: 10.1007/s 13595-011-0028-8

Apiolaza, L. A., S. Chauhan, M. Hayes, R. Nakada, M. Sharma, and J. Walker. 2013. Selection and breeding for wood quality. A new approach. N. Z. J. Forestry 58(1):32-37.

Associacao Brasileira de Normas Tecnicas (ABNT). 1997. NBR 7190: Projeto de Estruturas de Madeira. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro. 107 pp.

Ballarin, A. W. and H. A. Lara Palma. 2003. Resistance and rigidity properties of juvenile and mature Pinus tueda wood. Rev. Arvore 27(3):371-380.

Bhat, K. M., K. V. Bhat, and T. K. Dhamodaran. 1987. Effect of age and location on pulpwood quality of Eucalyptus graiulis. Div. of Wood Sci., Kerala Forest Research Institute, Thrissur, India. Volume 49, 19p.

Brasil, M. A. M., R. A. Veiga, and M. Ferreira. 1977. Variagao da densidade basica nas seccoes transversals do caule da base do tronco para a copa de eucalipto. Inst. Pesq. Estud. Florestais Piracicaba 15:73-82.

Chauhan. S. S., M. Sharma, J. Thomas, L. A. Apiolaza, D. A. Collings, and J. C. F. Walker. 2013. Methods for the very early selection of Pinus radiata D. Don for solid wood products. Ann. Forest Sci. 70:439-449.

Cherry, M. L., V. Vikram, D. Briggs, D. W. Cress, and G. T. Howe. 2008. Genetic variation in direct and indirect measures of wood stiffness in coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. Forest Res. 38(9):2476-2486. DOI:10.1139/X08-087

Christoforo, A. L., T. H. Panzera, F. B. Batista, P. H. Borges, F. A. L. Rocco, and C. F. Franco. 2011. The position effect of structural Eucalyptus round timber on the flexural modulus of elasticity. Rev. Eng. Agric. 31:1219-1225.

Couto, A. M., P. F. Trugilho, T. A. Neves, T. de P. Protasio, and V. A. Sa. 2013. Modeling of basic density of wood from Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using nondestructive methods. CERNE 19(1):27-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-77602013000100004

Downes. G. M., E. P. J. Beckers, N. D. Turvey, and H. Porada. 1993. Strength and structure of stems from fast grown Pinus radiata. Trees 7:131-136.

Emms, G., B. Nanayakkara, and J. Harrington. 2012. A novel technique for non-damaging measurement of sound speed in seedlings. Eur. J. Forest Res. 131:1449. doi: 10.1007/s 10342-012-0614-9

European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2010. EN 408: Timber structures--Structural timber and glued laminated timber--Determination of some physical and mechanical properties. CEN, Brussels. 42 pp.

Ferreira. M. 1972. Variacao da densidade basica da madeira de povoamentos comerciais de Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden nas idades de 11, 12, 13, 14 e 16 anos. Inst. Pesq. Estud. Florestais, Piracicaba. 4:65-89.

Gapare, W. J., B. S. Baltunis, C. M. Ivkovi', and II. X. Wu. 2009. Genetic correlations among juvenile wood quality and growth traits and implications for selection strategy in Pinus radiata D. Don. Ann. Forest Sci. 66(6):606.

Gominho, J., J. Figueira, and H. Pereira. 2001. Within-tree variation of heartwood, extractives and wood density in eucalypt hybrid urograndis (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla). Wood Fiber Sci. 33(1):3-8.

Goncalves. R., F. Batista, and R. G. M. Lorensani. 2013. Selecting Eucalyptus clones using ultrasound test on standing trees. Forest Prod. J. 63:112-118.

Goncalves, R., C. Bertoldo, M. V. Massak, F. A. F. Batista, and C. B. Secco. 2011. Velocity of ultrasonic waves in live trees and freshly felled logs. Wood Fiber Sci. 43(2):232-235.

Goncalves, R., C. B. Pedroso, and M. V. Massak. 2012. Acoustic and bending properties in Pinus elliottii beams obtained from trees of different ages. J. Wood Sci. 59:127-132.

Grabianowski, M., B. Manley, and J. C. F. Walker. 2006. Acoustic measurements on standing trees, logs and green lumber. Wood Sci. Technol. 40:205-216

Haygreen, J. G. and J. L. Bowyer. 1982. Forest Products and Wood Science: An Introduction. Iowa State University, Ames. 495 pp.

Huang, C. L., H. Lindstrom, R. Nakada, and J. Ralston. 2003. Cell wall structure and wood properties determined by acoustics--A selective review. Holz. Roh- Werkst. 61:321-335.

Ikeda, K., S. Yamamoto, T. Hakamata, S. Yamada, and A. Kondo. 2015. Early age evaluation by the stress wave speed for the breeding of high Young's modulus Japanese cedar. In: 19th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, R. J. Ross, R. Goncalves, and X. Wang (Eds.), September 2015, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.

Innes, T. C. 2007. Processing and wood properties of four ages of Eucalyptus obliqua. Holz. Roh- Werkst. 65: 197-200

Isik, F. and B. L. Li. 2003. Rapid assessment of wood density of live trees using the Resistograph for selection in tree improvement programs. Can. J. Forest Res. 33( 12):2426-2435.

Johnson, G. R. and B. L. Gartner. 2006. Genetic variation in basic density and modulus of elasticity of coastal Douglas-fir. Tree Genet. Genomes 3:25-33.

Kiaei, M. and A. Samariha. 2011. Relationship between altitude index and wood properties of Pinus eldarica medw (case study in north of Iran). G. U. J. Sci, 24(4):911-918.

Kumar, S., K. J. S. Jayawickrama, J. Lee, and M. Lausberg. 2002. Direct and indirect measures of stiffness and strength show high heritability in a wind-pollinated radiata pine progeny test in New Zealand. Silvae Genet. 51:256-261.

Lausberg, M. J. F., K. F. Gilchrist, and J. H. Skipwith. 1995. Wood properties of Eucalyptus nitens grown in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Forestry Sci. 25(2): 147-163.

Lenz, P., D. Auty, A. Achim, J. Beaulieu, and .1. Mackay. 2013. Genetic improvement of White Spruce mechanical wood traits--Early screening by means of acoustic velocity. Forests 4:575-594. doi: 10.3390/f4030575

Lima, J. T., S. C. S. Rosado, and A. D. Oliveira. 1992. Variacao da densidade da madeira de Eucalyptus grandis, Eucalyptus terenticornis e Eucalyptus camuldulensis no sentido longitudinal dos caules. Rev.sta Cie. Prat. 16(1): 123-127.

Lima, J. T., R. C. Sartorio, P. F. Trugilho, C. R. Cruz, and R. S. Vieira. 2007. Uso do resistografo para estimar a densidade basica e a resistencia a perfuracao da madeira de Eucalyptus. Sci. Forestalis 75:85-93.

Lindstrom, H., P. Harris, and R. Nakada. 2002. Methods for measuring stiffness of young trees. Holz. Roh- Werkst. 60:165-174.

Lorensani, R. G. M., C. S. Alves, and R. Goncalves. 2015. Prediction of basic density using parameters measured on trees. In: 19th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. R. J. Ross, R. Goncalves, and X. Wang (Eds.), September 2015, Rio de Janeiro. Brazil; USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.

Manfredi, V. 1985. Variacoes no rendimento da polpa sulfate ao longo do tronco de Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden e Eucalyptus saligna Smith. Doctoral dissertation. Escola Superior de Agriculture "Luiz de Queiroz", Piracicaba, Brazil. 105 pp.

McKenzie, II. M., C. J. A. Shelbourne, M. O. Kimberley, R. B. McKinley, and R. A. J. Britton. 2003. Processing young plantation-grown Eucalyptus nitens for solid-wood products: 2. Predicting product quality from tree, increment core, disc and 1-m billet properties. N. Z. J. Forestry Sci. 33(1):79-113.

McKinley, R. B., C. J. A. Sheibourne, C. B. Low, B. Penellum, and M. O. Kimberley. 2002. Wood properties of young Eucalyptus nitens. E. globulus, and E. maidenii in Northland, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Forestry Sci. 32:334-356.

Merlo, E. and O. Santaclara. 2012. Wood quality screening with acoustic methods in 3 years old pinaster pine progenies. Report. Madera Plus Calidad Forestal S.L., Parque Tecnologico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Vinas, Ourense, Spain. 14 pp.

Merlo, E., R. Zas, G. Pineiro, and F. Pedras. 2008 Variabilidad de parametros de calidad de madera entre y dentro de procedencias de Pseudo Tsugamenziesii. Cuad. Soc. Esp. Cie. Forestales 24:262-266.

Moore, J. and A. Lyon. 2008. Effects of rotation length on the grade recovery and wood properties of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) structural timber grown in Great Britain. Report of the Centre for Timber Engineering, Napier University, Edinburgh.

Neves, T. A., T. P. Protasio, P. F. Trugilho, M. L. A. Valle, L. C. Sousa, and C. M. Vieira. 2013. Qualidade da madeira de clones de Eucalyptus em diferentes idades para a producao de bioenergia. Rev. Cie. Agr. 56(2): 139-148. doi:10.4322/rca.2013.022

Oliveira, F. L., I. L. Lima, J. N. Garcia, and S. M. B. Florsheim. 2006. Wood properties of Pinus taeda depending on the age and the radial position in the log. Rev. Inst. Florestal 18:59-70.

Oliveira, J. T. S., J. C. Hellmeister, and M. Tomazello Filho. 2005. Variacao do teor de umidade e da densidade basica na madeira de sete especies de eucalipto. Rev. Arv: 29(1):115-127.

Padua, F. A., P. F. Trugilho, and J. T. Lima. 2006. Amostragem da madeira para a avaliacao da densidade basica em Eucalyptus. In: Encontro Brasileiro em Madeiras e Estruturas de Madeiras, Vol. 10, UNESP/CEVEMAD/IBRAMEM, Anais, Sao Pedro, Brazil. CD-ROM.

Purnell, R. C. 1988. Variation in wood properties of Eucalyptus nitens in a provenance trial on eastern Transvaal Flighveld in South Africa. S. Afr. Forestry J. 144:10-22.

Rosado, S. C. S. 1982. Avaliacao da densidade basica da madeira com um novo aparelho e correlacoes entre caracteres, em diferentes idades, em Eucalyptus spp. Doctoral dissertation. Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, Brazil. 89 pp.

Ruy, M. 2016. Classificacao de madeira rolica de Eucalipto por ultrassom. Doctoral dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. 116 pp.

Santaclara, O. 2010. Modelizacion de la calidad estructural de la madera sobre arbol en pie en masas de Pinus pinaster de Galicia. Trabajo de Diplomatura de Estudios Avanzados (DEA). 24 pp. (in Spanish).

Santaclara, O., J. G. Alvarez, and E. Merlo. 2011. Modeling structural lumber quality for Pinus pinaster Ait. in northwestern Spain using standing tree acoustic assessment, tree characteristics and stand variables. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, September 14-16, 2011, Sopron, Hungary; University of West Hungary, Sopron.

Sharma, M., L. A. Apiolaza, S. Chauhan, J. P. Mclean, and J. Wikaira. 2016. Ranking very young Pinus radiata families for acoustic stiffness and validation by microfibril angle. Ann. Forest Sci. 73:393. doi: 10.1007/s13595-015-0529-y

Shimoyama, V. R. S. and L. E. G. Barrichelo. 1991. Influencia anatomica e quimica sobre a densidade basica da madeira de Eucalyptus spp. In: Congresso Anual de Celulose e Papel da ABTCP, No. 24; ABTCP, Anais, Sao Paulo, Brazil. pp. 23-35.

Simoes, J. W., A. S. R. Coelho, H. A. Mello, and H. T. Z. Couto. 1980. Crescimento e Producao de Madeira de Eucalipto. IPEF, Piracicaba, Brazil. No. 20, pp. 77-97.

Sotomayor, J. F. M. 2013. Determinacao de Biomassa aerea em florestas nativas num ambiente agricola do Estado de Sao Paulo. Doctoral thesis. Universidade de Sao Paulo/ESALq, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 130 pp.

Stackpole, D. J., R. E. Vaillancourt, A. Alves, J. Rodrigues, and B. M. Potts. 2011. Genetic variation in the chemical components of Eucalyptus globulus wood. G3-Genes Genom. Genet. 1(2):151-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000372; PMID: 22384327

Sturion, J. A., J. C. D. Pereira, J. C. Albino, and M. Morita. 1987. Variacao da densidade basica da madeira de doze especies de Eucalyptus plantadas em Uberaba, MG. Bol. Pesqu. Florestal 14:28-38.

Teixeira, M. L. and R. Vargas Filho. 1994. Estudo da variabilidade da madeira de E. grandis ao longo do tronco e sua influencia nas caracteristicas do carvao vegetal. Rev. Cie. Prat. 18(1):90-98.

Thomas, D., M. Henson, B. Joe, S. Boyton, and R. Dickson. 2009. Review of growth and wood quality of plantation-grown Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden. Aust. Forestry 72(1):3-11.

Topaloglu, E., A. Y. Nurgul, L. Altun, and B. Serdar. 2016. Effect of altitude and aspect on various wood properties of Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) wood. Turk. J. Agric. Forestry 40(3):397-406. DOI:10.3906/tar-1508-95

Vikran, V., M. L. Cherry, D. Briggs, D. W. Cress, R. Evans, and G. T. Howe. 2011. Stiffness of Douglas-fir lumber: Effects of wood properties and genetics. Can. J. Forest Res. 41:1160-1173.

Wang, X., P. Carter, R. J. Ross, and B. K. Brashaw. 2007a. Acoustic assessment of wood quality of raw forest materials--A path to increased profitability. Forest Prod. J. 57(5):6-14.

Wang, X., R. J. Ross, P. Carter, and C. H. Harvey. 2007b. Acoustic evaluation of wood quality in standing trees. Part I. Acoustic wave behavior. Wood Sci. Technol. 39(1):28-38.

Wielinga, B., C. A. Raymond, R. James, and A. C. Matheson. 2009. Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interactions for green and basic density and stiffness of Pinus radiata d. don estimated using acoustics. Silvae Genet. 58:112-122.

Wilkins, A. P. and R. Horne. 1991. Wood density variation of young plantation grown Eucalyptus grandis in response to silvicultural treatments. Forest Ecol. Munag. 40(1/2):39-50.

Wu, H. X., M. B. Powell, J. L. Yang, M. Ivkovich, and T. A. McRae. 2007. Efficiency of early selection for rotation-aged wood quality traits in radiata pine. Ann. Forest Sci. 64:1-9.

Zangiacomo, A. L., A. L. Christoforo, and F. A. R. Lahr. 2013. Modulos de elasticidade longitudinal e transversal em vigas rolicas de madeira de Corymbia citriodora. Vertices 15(1):63-68. DOI: 10.5935/1809-2667.20130006

Zhu, G.., M. Zhang, T. Cao., L. Ni, A. Zhong, and H. Fu. 2012. Effects of sediment type on stern mechanical properties of the submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata (L.F) Royle. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 21:468-474.

Raquel Goncalves Rafael Gustavo Mansini Lorensani Monica Ruy Nadia Schiavon Veiga Gabriela Muller Cilene da Silva Alves Guilherme Alonso Martins

The authors are, respectively, Professor, Nondestructive Testing Lab. (raquel@agr.unicamp.br [corresponding author]); and PhD Student, PhD Student, PhD Student, Undergraduate Student, Undergraduate Student, and Undergraduate Student (rafaelmansini@hotmail.com, monkaruy@gmail.com, nadiasveiga@gmail.com, gabrielmcesar@gmail.com, cilenealves7@gmail.com, guimartins93@gmail.com), School of Agric. Engineering (FEAGRI), Univ. of Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil. This paper was received for publication in February 2017. Article no. 17-00013.

[c]Forest Products Society 2019.

Forest Prod. J. 69(1):5-16.

doi: 10.13073/FPJ-D-17-00013
Table 1.--Sampling of seedlings, trees, and logs used for ultrasound,
basic density, tension, and bending tests for three different clones
from 3 to 72 months of age.

                                             Age (mo)
Clone                               3    12  24  48  72  Total

Sampling of seedlings and trees
A                                    51  30  30  30  30  171
B                                    20  30  30  30  30  140
C                                    50  --  --  --  30   80
Total                               121  60  60  60  90  391
Sampling for mechanical evaluation
A                                    35   6  10  10  6    32
B                                    10  10  10  10  6    36
C                                    40  --  --  --  6     6
Total                                85  16  20  20  18   74

Table 2.--Characteristics of altitude (m), temperature ([degrees]C),
and precipitation (mm) of the planting sites of clones A, B, and C.(a)



Clone          12         Age (mo)
A
Altitude         610      24       48       72       Average

Temperature       20.2
Precipitation      1.305    680      750      650      673
B                            20.3     20.3     20.3     20.3
Altitude         676      1,305    1,305    1,344    1,315
Temperature       20.0
Precipitation  1,299        730      748      684      710
C                            20.3     20.3     20.6     20.3
Altitude                  1,305    1,305    1,273    1,296
Temperature
Precipitation                                 684
                                               20.6
                                            1.273

Clone          Coefficient
A              of variation
Altitude       (%)

Temperature
Precipitation  9
B              0
Altitude       1
Temperature
Precipitation  5
C              1
Altitude       1
Temperature
Precipitation

(a) Altitude, temperature, and precipitation data provided by
International Paper Company.

Table 3.--Average values of diameter (a) (mm), height (m), and basic
density (kg [m.sup.-3]); coefficient of variation (CV, %) of clones
A, B, and C at different ages (mo); and analysis of statistical
differences between ages (lowercase letters in the rows) and between
clones (numbers in the columns); different letters and numbers indicate
statistically different values.

                                          Age (mo)
Clone          Parameters   3             24
Diameter                           12               48      72

A              Average       2.5          110.6
               CV            7.2    64.7   14.3     124.5   190.1
               Statistical   a 1     7.6    c 1       9.2     8.9
B              Average       2.8     b 1  119.9       d 1     e 3
               CV           12.5    81.2   12.2     143.0   168.7
               Statistical   a 2    16.1    c 2       9.1     6.4
C              Average       2.5     b 2              d 2     e 2
               CV           10.1                            139.5
               Statistical   a 1                             12.4
Height                                                        b 1
A              Average      0.31          16.12
               CV            9.3    7.78    2.8     17.52   28.72
               Statistical  a 1-2   13.7    c 1       2.6     3.6
B              Average      0.28     b 1  16.47       d 1     e 3
               CV            7.5   10.66   14.9     20.87   26.75
               Statistical   a 1     5.8    c 1       3.0     2.6
C              Average      0.31     b 2              d 2     e 2
               CV           10.1                            20.45
               Statistical    a2                              5.7
Basic density                                                 b 1
A              Average       350            480
               CV           17.8     430    6.8       470     480
               Statistical   a 1     5.2    c 1       3.8     4.6
B              Average       360     b 1    470       c 1     c 1
               CV           15.7     460   10.0       460     460
               Statistical   a 1     4.1    b 1       5.S     5.0
C              Average       270     b 2              b 1     b 2
               CV           17.0                              470
               Statistical   a 2                              4.8
                                                              b 2

(a) In the case of trees, corresponds to the diameter at breast height.

Table 4.--Average values of velocity of ultrasound wave propagation
(m [s.sup.-1]), strength in seedling stem (3 mo; [f.sub.t], MPa) and in
wood from trees ([f.sub.m], MPa), average values of modulus of
elasticity in seedlings stem ([E.sub.t], MPa) and in wood from trees
([E.sub.M], MPa); coefficient of variation (CV, %); and analysis of
statistical difference between ages (lowercase letters in rows)
and between clones (numbers in columns); different letters and
numbers indicate statistically different values.

                                          Age (mo)
Clone             Parameter    3          12       24       48
Velocity of
ultrasound
wave propagation

A                 Average      2,249      2,697    3,130    3,811
                  CV              10.1        7.7     16.7      9.2
                  Statistical    a 1        b 1      c 1      d 1
B                 Average      2,048      2,475    2,835    3,133
                  CV               4.7        5.6     10.5     12.3
                  Statistical    a 2        b 2      c 2      d 2
C                 Average      2,095
                  CV               7.7
                  Statistical    a 2
Strength
A                 Average         19.8       31.7     42.5     57.9
                  CV              27.3       20.8     13.1      9.4
                  Statistical    a 1        b 1      d 1      d 1
B                 Average         23.2       30.6     40.7     51.4
                  CV              44.9       20.7      9.3      8.2
                  Statistical    a 2        a 1      b 2     cd 2
C                 Average         19.0
                  CV              36.5
                  Statistical    a 1
Modulus
of elasticity
A                 Average      1,822      5,858    9,704    9,772
                  CV              58.2       25.6     11.8     14.8
                  Statistical    a 1        b 1     de 1      e 1
B                 Average          2.241  5,440    6,283    5,843
                  CV              60.1       12.2     14.7     11.5
                  Statistical    a 1        b 1     bc 2      b 2
C                 Average      1,256
                  CV              59.1
                  Statistical    a 2

Clone             72
Velocity of
ultrasound
wave propagation

A                 4,654
                      8.1
                    e 1
B                 3,852
                      9.6
                    e 2
C                 3,954
                      5.9
                    b 2
Strength
A                    46.0
                     12.0
                    c 1
B                    44.2
                     16.0
                   bc 1
C                    47.7
                      5.7
                    b 1
Modulus
of elasticity
A                 8,257
                     18.3
                   cd 1
B                 7,346
                      8.6
                   cd 1
C                 7,295
                     30.6
                    b 1
COPYRIGHT 2019 Forest Products Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Goncalves, Raquel; Gustavo, Rafael; Lorensani, Mansini; Ruy, Monica; Veiga, Nadia Schiavon; Muller,
Publication:Forest Products Journal
Geographic Code:3BRAZ
Date:Mar 22, 2019
Words:8706
Previous Article:Tribological Behavior of Microtextured Cemented Carbide in Contact with Wood.
Next Article:Using Acoustic Emission Technique to Detect Termite Activities in Wood: Laboratory Experiment.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters