Printer Friendly

Everyone in Georgia is about to die!

(PHOENIX, AZ April 25, 2014) In. April, the governor of Georgia--the southern U.S. state, not the Eastern European republic--signed a new law that is tantamount to signing Death Warrants on thousands--if not tens of thousands--of his state's citizens. Or at least that's what the anti-rights crowd and their friends in the hunestream media would have people believe based on the screeching headlines and breathless stories.

OK, maybe they weren't quite that bad. hut the headlines used terms like "Controversial," "Unprecedented," "Sweeping," and "Guns Everywhere" to describe the new law which actually brings the Peach State's gun carry regulations closer into line with the vast majority of other states.

In the stories themselves, there were almost always comments and quotes from professional anti-rights advocates like Mark (Mr. Gabby Giffords) Kelly, decrying the "irresponsible" nature of' the law and insinuating that some dire consequences will inevitably result. The Mike Bloomberg subsidiary, Moms Demand Action, called it "a very, very dangerous kill bill."

What the bill actually does is ease blanket bans on carry of firearms in houses of worship (allowing each church, synagogue, etc. to make their own decisions on the matter) in certain government buildings that don't have controlled entry with metal detectors, etc. to enforce a gun ban, and in bars and taverns.

It also gives school districts the option of authorizing some staff members to legally carry on school grounds, and provides a specific mechanism for someone who inadvertently carries a gun into the security area of an airport to legally backpedal and leave the area prior to going through the checkpoint In addition, it makes some adjustments to who can and can't receive a license to carry.

The worried hand-wringing is typical whenever some state liberalizes their gun laws. The anti-rights folks always paint a picture of doom and gloom and blood in the streets, but their warnings never come true, and the media almost never reports that fact. The hoplophobes insinuate the dangerous and scary nature of the laws by conjuring up images of drunken hooligans opening fire across crowded dance floors. Or suggestions that terrorists will be more likely to try and smuggle guns onto planes if they can--with a license--legally get the guns-closer to the checkpoint.

Of course these scare tactics, don't comport with real world experience. In real life, prohibitions on licensed firearms carry in bars and churches are the exception. not the rule; few states actually ban these activities, and if they do. there is nothing to keep thugs, criminals, and terrorists from ignoring the bans.

Meanwhile, licensed carriers try to obey the laws and arc sometimes punished for it. For instance when a rushed traveler starts pulling things from his pockets at the airport checkpoint and suddenly realizes that the gun that's always on his belt is still on his belt.

Under existing Georgia law, anyone wishing to legally carry a handgun in public must have a Georgia Weapons License--meaning submitting to extensive scrutiny. People who submit to, and pass, the rigorous investigation arc not generally the sort of people who irresponsibly consume alcohol while carrying, or get into fights in bars--or anywhere else.

And the evidence in Georgia and dozens of other states bears this out. Concealed carry licensees are among the most law-abiding and responsible members of society. Some studies indicate that the crime rate among people licensed to carry concealed firearms is lower than that of law enforcement officers. Shooting histories show that licensed civilians are also more judicious and more accurate than LEOs when involved in a shooting incident. They are significantly less likely to hit a bystander, more likely to hit the bad guy, and typically fire far fewer shots than do police. (Of course there are other factors that play into those statistics, but they are still significant.)

The focus of *laws should always be on actual good and real harm, not supposed good and imagined harm. and not irrational fears and mistrust. Georgia lawmakers and Governor Nathan Deal applied a little common sense to what were unreasonable restrictions. They recognized specific problems--such as innocent carry licensees being prosecuted for inadvertent actions at airports. and school districts unable to effectively protect the children in their care---and they provided some rational solutions for those problems.

They also recognized that there were "solutions" on the books to "problems" that didn't really ex-ist--like the "problem" of licensed people carrying guns in churches and bars--so they removed those false "solutions" and dramatically reduced complications for people who choose to routinely and responsibly carry.

The end result is an expansion of Liberty and a repeal of irrational and harmful restrictions on individual rights. These were a few small steps in the right direction. After the laws go into effect this July, and no negative consequences materialize, perhaps a few more states will follow Georgia's lead and we'll see more reasonable, responsible-actions like this in the future.

[c]2014 The Firearms bnilition, all rights reserved. Reprinting, posting, and distributing permitted with inclusion or this copyright statement. www.FirearmsCoalition.org.
COPYRIGHT 2014 InterMedia Outdoors, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:From The Firearms Coalition
Author:Knox, Jeff
Publication:Shotgun News
Date:Jun 20, 2014
Words:838
Previous Article:"There's a price to be paid".
Next Article:ARs now is the time to buy: if you regret missing out on some deals in the past, spend your money while prices are low.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters