Printer Friendly

Evaluation of the clinical and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol microemulsion in dogs/Efeitos clinicos e cardiorespiratorios do propofol em microemulsao em caes.

INTRODUCTION

When new formulations of a drug are developed, studies are required to check for possible alterations in its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Some studies have observed differences related to the effects of new propofol formulations (FECHNER et al., 2004; DUBEY & KUMAR, 2005), such as pain on injection, and hemodynamic and respiratory effects. Formulations in microemulsion have also been proposed to minimize some undesired characteristics from the propofol in lipid emulsion, such as the relatively short storage time, the requirement of controlled temperature and the support for bacterial growth (MOREY et al., 2006).

Differently from the propofol in lipid emulsion, the pharmaceutical composition used in this study is an injectable oil-water microemulsion of propofol, with reduced dispersed hydrophobic particles (1-50nm), transparent and with a viscosity comparable to that of an aqueous solution. So, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that this new propofol formulation would have different clinical and cardiorespiratory characteristics compared to the lipid emulsion formulation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six healthy female mongrel dogs, aged 1-4 years, were enrolled in the study. The mean [+ or -] SD weight of the dogs was 14.8 [+ or -] 1.2kg. Health status was assessed on the basis of results of a physical examination, complete blood count, and serum biochemical analyses. Dogs were housed in individual cages, fed with dry dog food, and provided with water ad libitum.

Food and water were withheld for 12 and 2 hours, respectively, prior to the instrumentation period. General anesthesia was induced by the inhalation of isoflurane (a) (5v%) in 5L [minute.sup.-1] oxygen using a mask connected to a circle breathing circuit.

Venous catheters (b) (20-gauge) were placed in both cephalic veins, one for the infusion of lactated ringer solution (5mL [kg.sup.-1] [hour.sup.-1]) and another for propofol administration. In order to monitor the arterial blood pressure, a 20-gauge catheter was placed in the femoral artery and connected to a disposable transducer and a multiparametric monitor (c). The cardiac output (CO) was obtained using the thermodilution technique. For this, a six French catheter introducer (d) was placed into the jugular vein and a pulmonary artery catheter (e) (5 French, 4 lumen) was then advanced via the introducer, until its distal lumen was positioned in the main pulmonary artery. Its correct location was confirmed on the observation of characteristic pressure waveforms. The proximal lumen recorded the central venous pressure (CVP), while its distal lumen recorded the mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). PAOP was obtained by inflating temporarily the balloon located at the tip of the pulmonary artery catheter.

In order to perform the CO measurements, 5mL boluses of cold saline solution (0.9% NaCl) were administered into the central venous port of the pulmonary artery catheter. This solution was always administered by the same person at the end of expiration. The CO was measured three times, and the arithmetic mean of the three values was used for each time point. Measures with a difference higher than 10% from the previous one were excluded.

At the end of the instrumentation period, all the catheters were filled with 0.9% NaCl solution containing heparin (5IU [mL.sup.-1]) and occluded until the start of baseline data collection. A 60 minute-period was given to allow complete recovery from inhalant anesthesia.

Experimental design

All the animals were submitted to a randomized, crossover design, receiving both formulations of propofol (f,g) IV to induce and maintain anesthesia. Each animal was its own control and a 15-day period was allowed between each treatment.

Baseline cardiorespiratory variables were measured 10 minutes before the propofol induction (T-10) and included: heart rate (HR; beats [minute.sup.-1]), systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP; mmHg), CVP (cm[H.sub.2]O), CO (L [minute.sup.-1]), mPAP (mmHg) and PAOP (mmHg), respiratory rate ([f.sub.R]; breaths [minute.sup.-1]), body temperature (BT; [degrees]C) and arterial blood gas (partial pressure of oxygen--pa[O.sub.2] and carbon dioxide--paC[O.sub.2] (mmHg), pH, HC[O.sub.3.sup.-] (mEq [L.sup.-1]), base excess- BE (mEq [L.sup.-1]), and oxyhemoglobin saturation - Sa[O.sub.2] (%)). Variables obtained by calculation included: cardiac index (CI; L [minute.sup.-1] [m.sup.-2]) and stroke volume index (SVI; mL [beat.sup.-1] [kg.sup.-1]), the pulmonary (PVRI; dynes seconds [cm.sup.-5] [m.sup.-2]) and systemic (SVRI; dynes seconds [cm.sup.-5] [m.sup.-2]) vascular resistance indices, and the left (LVSWI; cJ) and right (RVSWI; cJ) ventricular stroke work indices.

Anesthesia was induced with propofol administered by slow IV injection to effect, and the end point was considered to achieve lateral recumbency and reduction in jaw tone sufficient to allow orotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained using a syringe pump (h) at a constant rate infusion (CRI) of 0.4mg [kg.sup.-1] [minute.sup.-1], and the animals were allowed to breathe spontaneously. After induction of anesthesia, data were collected approximately 1 minute after intubation, and also at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes (T0, T15, T30, T45, T60, T75 and T90). Arterial blood samples (0.3mL) were obtained from the femoral artery using heparinized insulin syringes and analyzed for blood gas analysis at the same time points, except at T45 and T75.

The occurrence of adverse effects, the presence of excitement or pain during propofol injection, as well as the intubation quality were evaluated. During the recovery period, possible adverse effects, time (minutes) for extubation (EXT), sternal recumbency (STR), ambulation (AMB) and total recovery (TREC) were also recorded.

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used to evaluate within-group changes in parametric variables over time, followed by Dunnet post hoc analysis. The paired t-test was used for paired data to detect differences between the groups (P<0,05).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The induction dose did not differ significantly between treatments (8.3 [+ or -] 1.0mg [kg.sup.-1] and 7.9 [+ or -] 0.4mg [kg.sup.-1] for the MICRO and EMU treatment, respectively). All the animals had a smooth and rapid induction, with no signs of excitement, pain on injection or any other undesired effect. Intubation was easily performed in all animals. The constant rate infusion (0.4mg [kg.sup.-1] [min.sup.-1]) was selected based on a previous study performed by OLESKOVICZ (2009).

As obtained by FERRO et al. (2005) with the use of a conventional propofol CRI of 0.4mg [kg.sup.-1] [minute.sup.-1] in dogs, the HR in our study did not present significant alterations throughout the experiment period when both formulations were used (Table 1). Increases heart rate in response to a reduction in the arterial blood pressure are usually not observed when propofol is being used, this may be due to the fact that propofol can decrease the baroreflex sensitivity (BRANSON, 2007).

No significant differences were observed in SAP, DAP and MAP values between treatments, but a similar significant reduction of these parameters occurred in both groups (Figure 1). This reduction is probably related to both the reduction of the SVRI and the CI, as seen below. A decrease in blood pressure in dogs receiving propofol was also seen by FERRO et al. (2005). Although our mean pressure values are above the ones considered sufficient to maintain perfusion to all vital organs and tissues (MAP>65mmHg; Table 1), this reduction could be important in populations affected by systemic disease.

In animals receiving MICRO, a decrease of 22% in the CI was observed in comparison to baseline values, and the SVI was significantly lower during all the infusion period, presenting a 25% decrease, with mean values significantly lower with the use of the MICRO, at T15 and from T45 to T90.

According to NAKAIGAWA et al. (1995), the CI decrease is related to the change in SVI during propofol anesthesia and it is believed that the same situation happened on our study (Figure 1). Changes in SVI depend on several factors, such as changes in preload and in myocardial contractility. HETTRICK et al. (1997) observed a reduction in stroke volume in dogs receiving a propofol CRI of 0.3mg [kg.sup.-1] [min.sup.-1]. It was found that this reduction on stroke volume was due to a reduction in myocardial contractility. Some authors use the LVSWI as an indicator of cardiac contractility, but based on the research data, it cannot be affirmed that there was a direct myocardial depression in our study. A reduction of the LVSWI values was seen at T15 and at T30 in animals receiving EMU, and during all the infusion period with the use of MICRO, and this effect was more evident in this latter (Table 1).

A decrease in CVP was observed in both groups, but this reduction was significant only in animals in EMU group (Figure 1). The reduced CVP values in this study was probably related to vasodilatation and the greater compliance of vascular beds caused by propofol, as demonstrated by the reduction in SVRI seen in this study. The mechanisms involved in the vasodilatation caused by propofol are controversial and it may be due to different factors, among them, the release of nitric oxide, which may be more related to the lipid emulsion used in the propofol formulation (Intralipid[R]) (DOURSOUT et al., 2002).

The RVSWI was significantly lower from the beginning to the end of the infusion in both groups, while the pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) did not have a significant alteration over time (Table 1). The highest PVRI values observed in the MICRO treatment are explained by the constant higher values of mPAP observed in this group.

Whilst the mean pulmonary arterial pressure has remained with higher values in animals receiving MICRO, a more significant reduction of this parameter was observed in this group in relation to baseline values--32.7% in comparison with 22.1% using EMU. No significant alterations were observed for the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure.

Respiratory depression is one of the most important side effects reported following propofol administration, with both a respiratory center depression and a decrease in the response to the arterial carbon dioxide tension in dogs (MUIR & GADAWSKI, 1998). The respiratory rate (fR) was significantly lower from T15 until the end of infusion compared to the baseline values in dogs receiving MICRO, and for a shorter period in EMU (from T0 to T30). Although this significant reduction in fR was observed in our study, no mean values dropped below 12 and 11 breaths per minute (MICRO and EMU, respectively).

The PaC[O.sub.2] values were below the reference range at the baseline evaluation in both groups, probably due to an hyperventilation, a physiological change expected in situations of stress (MUIR, 2008), result of the handling and restraint required during the recovery period after instrumentation. The normal pH values, the decreased PaC[O.sub.2], and the low bicarbonate suggests the occurrence of a compensatory respiratory alkalosis at T-10, as explained by MADIAS (2008). Perhaps these alterations could have been attenuated if a longer recovery period was given after the instrumentation.

After the induction of anesthesia, the pH values decreased rapidly, reaching values compatible with a mild acidemia in both groups, corroborating with the findings of LOPES et al. (2007). It is suggested that the sudden alteration of the C[O.sub.2] concentration after starting the infusion--low PaC[O.sub.2] values to normal ones--caused a slight increase in the bicarbonate and [H.sup.+] concentration due to the dissociation of [H.sub.2]C[O.sub.3], leading to acidemia.

The Pa[O.sub.2] only reached values close to 250mmHg, even with the use of 100% oxygen. Whilst there is no data that can prove our hypothesis, it is believed that these findings may be due to the formation of atelectasis already during the instrumentation period. High oxygen concentrations have been associated with an increase in atelectasis formation that persists during the postoperative period (MAGNUSSON & SPAHN, 2003).

In the recovery period, the animals presented a similar behavior with both formulations. The time for EXT, STR, AMB and TREC were 16.5 [+ or -] 7.6, 42,5 [+ or -] 23.8, 54.0 [+ or -] 19.0 and 60.5 [+ or -] 21.0 for the lipid emulsion and 6.5 [+ or -] 3.9, 38.8 [+ or -] 8.4, 54.7 [+ or -] 25.3 and 56.3 [+ or -] 23.0 for the microemulsion, showing no significant difference between treatments. The extubation time obtained with MICRO was similar to that observed by BEIER et al. (2009) after a target-controlled propofol administration of 120 minutes.

TSAI et al. (2007) demonstrated that 89.7% of the dogs anesthetized with a continuous infusion of propofol showed an excellent recovery without any signs of excitement or vocalization. However, opisthotonus was observed in two animals in the EMU group after the infusion ceased, lasting approximately 10 minutes. One of the animals receiving MICRO had a short lasting hyperextension of the right thoracic limb and on the left forelimb during the infusion, followed by the occurrence of opisthotonus, which disappeared when the infusion was discontinued at T90. One animal treated with MICRO had opisthotonus in the recovery period, which began 17 minutes after the infusion was stopped.

Transient signs of neurologic excitement during or after propofol administration have been reported, including opisthotonus (TSAI et al., 2007). According to BEVAN (1993), propofol seems to have an antagonistic effect on spinal aminoacid glycine and strychnine receptors, which could explain the opisthotonus and the myoclonus.

CONCLUSION

The new microemulsion used in our study presented some similarities when compared to the conventional propofol in lipid emulsion. Both formulations presented similar respiratory and recovery characteristics, but some differences were observed in hemodynamic parameters, highlighted by a marked reduction in CI and SVI with the use of the microemulsion of propofol.

Based only in the cardiorespiratory and clinical results, no advantages are seen in the use of microemulsion in dogs. Pharmacokinetic studies are being performed to search for possible advantages in its use.

BIOETHICS AND BIOSSECURITY COMMITTEE

(Protocol 1.03/09).

SOURCES AND MANUFACTURERS

a--Isoforine[R], Cristalia Produtos Quimicos e Farmaceuticos, Itapira, SP.

b--BD Angiocath[TM], BD, Sao Paulo, SP.

c--Multiparameteric monitor 90496, Spacelabs Medical, Issaquah, Washington, USA.

d--Intro-Flex, Edwards Critical Care Division, Irvine, CA, USA.

e--Swan-Ganz Catheter Model 132F5, Edwards Critical Care Division, Irvine, CA, USA.

f--Propovet (10 mg [mL.sup.-1]), pilot batch 001/2009, Ouro Fino Saude Animal, Cravinhos, SP.

g--Propovan (10 mg [mL.sup.-1]), Cristalia Produtos Quimicos e Farmaceuticos, Itapira, SP.

h--LIGNEA SEP-S10 Plus, Biosensor, Americana, SP.

REFERENCES

BEIER, S.L. et al. Effect of remifentanil on requirements for propofol administered by use of a target-controlled infusion system for maintaining anesthesia in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.70, n.6, p.703-709, Jun. 2009. Available from: <http://avmajournals.avma.org/doi/pdf/10.2460/ajvr.70.6.703>. Accessed: Nov. 26, 2012. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.6.703.

BEVAN, J.C. Propofol-related convulsions. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, v.40, n.9, p.805-809, Sept. 1993. Available from: <http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF03009247>. Accessed: Nov. 27, 2012.

BRANSON, K.R. Injectable and alternative anesthetics techniques. In: TRANQUILLI, W.J.T.; GRIMM, K.A. (Ed.). Lumb & Jones' veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. 4.ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. p.273-300.

DOURSOUT, M.F. et al. Role of propofol and its solvent, intralipid, in nitric oxide-induced peripheral vasodilatation in dogs. British Journal of Anaesthesia, v.89, n.3, p.492-498, Sept. 2002. Available from: <http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/89/3/492.long>. Accessed: Nov. 27, 2012. doi: 10.1093/bja/89.3.492.

DUBEY, P.K.; KUMAR, A. Pain on injection of lipid-free propofol and propofol emulsion containing medium-chain triglyceride: a comparative study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, v.101, n.4, p.1060-1062, Oct. 2005. Available from: <http://www.anesthesiaanalgesia.org/content/101/4/1060.long>. Accessed: Nov. 28, 2012. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166951.72702.05.

FECHNER, J. et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new propofol prodrug GPI 15715 and propofol emulsion. Anesthesiology, v.101, n.3, p.626-639, Sept. 2004. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15329587>. Accessed: Nov. 26, 2012.

FERRO, P.C. et al. Variaveis fisiologicas em caes submetidos a infusao continua de diferentes doses de propofol. Ciencia Rural, v.35, n.5, p.1103-1108, May 2005. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cr/v35n5/a18v35n5.pdf>. Accessed: Nov. 27, 2012. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782005000500018.

HETTRICK, D.A. et al. Alterations in canine left ventricular-arterial coupling and mechanical efficiency produced by propofol. Anesthesiology, v.86, n.5, p.1088-1093, May 1997. Available from: <http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/Fulltext/1997/05000/Alterations_in_Canine_Left_Ventricular_arterial.12.aspx>. Accessed: Nov. 27, 2012.

JUNIOR, A.S.C. et al. Microemulsoes como veiculo de drogas para administracao ocular topica. Arquivo Brasileiro de Oftalmologia, v.66, p.385-391, May/June, 2003. Available from: < http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abo/v66n3/v66n03a24.pdf>. Accessed: Nov. 26, 2012. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27492003000300025.

LOPES, P.C.F. et al. Efeitos de diferentes fracoes inspiradas de oxigenio sobre a dinamica respiratoria em caes submetidos a infusao continua de propofol e mantidos em ventilacao espontanea. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Resarch and Animal Science, v.44, p.30-37, 2007. Available from: <http://www.revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/26587>. Accessed: Nov. 29, 2012.

MADIAS, N.E.A. Respiratory alkalosis and acidosis. In: ALPERN, R.J.H. (Ed.). Seldin and Giebisch's the kidney: physiology and pathophysiology. 4.ed. St. Louis: Elsevier, 2008. V.1, p.1721-1745.

MAGNUSSON, L.; SPAHN, D.R. New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaestheia, v.91, n.1, p.61-72, Jul. 2003. Available from: <http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/91/1/61.long>. Accessed: Nov. 28, 2012. doi: 10.1093/ bja/aeg085.

MOREY, T.E. et al. Anesthetic properties of a propofol microemulsion in dogs. Anesthesia & Analgesia, v.103, n.4, p.882-887, Oct. 2006. Available from: <http://www.anesthesiaanalgesia.org/content/103/4/882.long>. Accessed: Nov. 28, 2012. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237126.57445.80.

MUIR, W.W., III; GADAWSKI, J.E. Respiratory depression and apnea induced by propofol in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.59, n.2, p.157-161, Feb. 1998. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9492929>. Accessed: Nov. 27, 2012.

MUIR, W.W., III. Pain and stress. In: GAYNOR, J.S.M. (Ed.). Handbook of veterinary pain management. New York: Elsevier, 2008. V.1, chapt.3, p.42-46.

NAKAIGAWA, Y. et al. Effects of graded infusion rates of propofol on cardiovascular haemodynamics, coronary circulation and myocardial metabolism in dogs. British Journal of Anaesthesia, v.75, n.5, p.616-21, Nov. 1995. Available from: <http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/75/5/616.long>. Accessed: Nov. 26, 2012.

OLESKOVICZ, N.C. et al. Efeitos clinicos da administracao de duas formulacoes de medicacao pre-anestesica em cadelas submetidas a ovariosalpingohisterectomia sob infusao continua de propofol em microemulsao. In: SEMINARIO DE INICIACAO CIENTIFICA DA UDESC, 19., 2009 Lages, SC. Anais ... Florianopolis: UDESC, 2009. p.116.

TSAI, Y.C. et al. Clinical comparison of recovery from total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, v.69, n.11, p.1179-1182, Nov. 2007. Available from: <https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jvms/69/11/69_n_1179/_article>. Accessed: Nov. 28, 2012. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.1179.

Andre Luis Correa (I) Renato Batista Tamanho (II) Aury Nunes de Moraes (II) Suzane Lilian Beier (III) Doughlas Regalin (II) Felipe Hertzing Farias (II) Pamela Spolti (II) Nilson Oleskovicz (II)

(I) Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP), Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 455, Cerqueira Cesar, 01246-000, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil. E-mail: andrecorrea@usp.br. Autor para correspondencia.

(II) Departamento de Medicina Veterinaria, Centro de Ciencia Agroveterinarias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages, SC, Brasil.

(III) Departamento de Clinica e Cirurgia Veterinarias, Escola de Veterinaria, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Received 02.09.12 Approved 11.30.12 Returned by the author 04.24.13 CR-6769

Table 1--Mean values and standard deviation of heart rate
(HR; beats [minute.sup.-1]), mean and pulmonary arterial
pressure (MAP, mPAP), systemic vascular resistance index
(SVRI; dynes seconds [cm.sup.-5] [m.sup.-2]), left and
right ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI; cJ; RVSWI; cJ),
pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI; dynes seconds
[cm.sup.-5] [m.sup.-2]), pH, arterial partial pressure
of carbon dioxide (PaC[O.sub.2]; mmHg) in female dogs
submitted to anesthetic induction and maintenance using
propofol in microemulsion (M; n=6) or lipid emulsion (E; n=6).

                G   T-10                 T0

HR              M   118 [+ or -] 18      123 [+ or -] 25
                E   120 [+ or -] 19      126 [+ or -] 6

MAP             M   102 [+ or -] 8       85 [+ or -] 9 *
                E   97 [+ or -] 12       82 [+ or -] 7 *

SVRI            M   2645 [+ or -] 625    2569 [+ or -] 491
                E   2419 [+ or -] 527    2166 [+ or -] 554

LVSWI           M   1.58 [+ or -] 0.4    1.04 [+ or -] 0.23 *
                E   1.44 [+ or -] 0.44   1.19 [+ or -] 0.38

mPAP            M   13 [+ or -] 3        13 [+ or -] 2 (a)
                E   12 [+ or -] 4        10 [+ or -] 2 *(b)

PVRI            M   254 [+ or -] 81      264 [+ or -] 80
                E   232 [+ or -] 92      208 [+ or -] 93

RVSWI           M   0.21 [+ or -] 0.07   0.15 [+ or -] 0.04 *
                E   0.18 [+ or -] 0.07   0.14 [+ or -] 0.04 *

pH              M   7.40 [+ or -] 0.04   7.29 [+ or -] 0.04 *
                E   7.42 [+ or -] 0.02   7.32 [+ or -] 0.04 *

PaC[O.sub.2]    M   26.6 [+ or -] 3.2    40.8 [+ or -] 5.7 *
                E   27.0 [+ or -] 3.4    39.1 [+ or -] 5.1 *

                G   T15                    T30

HR              M   123 [+ or -] 23        119 [+ or -] 20
                E   114 [+ or -] 13        108 [+ or -] 15

MAP             M   72 [+ or -] 12 *       71 [+ or -] 11 *
                E   67 [+ or -] 7 *        74 [+ or -] 12 *

SVRI            M   2434 [+ or -] 672      2277 [+ or -] 479
                E   1859 [+ or -] 550 *    2274 [+ or -] 542

LVSWI           M   0.80 [+ or -] 0.2 *    0.82 [+ or -] 0.13 *
                E   1.02 [+ or -] 0.35 *   1.03 [+ or -] 0.25 *

mPAP            M   10 [+ or -] 3 * (a)    10 [+ or -] 3 *(a)
                E   7 [+ or -] 2 * (b)     7 [+ or -] 2 *(b)

PVRI            M   257 [+ or -] 69 (a)    256 [+ or -] 46
                E   162 [+ or -] 92 (b)    171 [+ or -] 87

RVSWI           M   0.11 [+ or -] 0.03 *   0.12 [+ or -] 0.03 *
                E   0.10 [+ or -] 0.03 *   0.10 [+ or -] 0.03 *

pH              M   7.34 [+ or -] 0.03 *   7.33 [+ or -] 0.03 *
                E   7.30 [+ or -] 0.04 *   7.32 [+ or -] 0.02 *

PaC[O.sub.2]    M   37.5 [+ or -] 5.0 *    39.5 [+ or -] 3.6 *
                E   41.4 [+ or -] 9.0 *    40.4 [+ or -] 5.0 *

                G   T45                      T60

HR              M   120 [+ or -] 16          121 [+ or -] 13
                E   111 [+ or -] 23          108 [+ or -] 25

MAP             M   75 [+ or -] 13 *         83 [+ or -] 13 *
                E   78 [+ or -] 12 *         83 [+ or -] 11 *

SVRI            M   2501 [+ or -] 531        2689 [+ or -] 369
                E   2230 [+ or -] 403        2588 [+ or -] 482

LVSWI           M   0.8 [+ or -] 0.27 *(a)   0.94 [+ or -] 0.18 *
                E   1.16 [+ or -] 0.31 (b)   1.16 [+ or -] 0.22

mPAP            M   10 [+ or -] 3 *          11 [+ or -] 3 *(a)
                E   9 [+ or -] 2 *           8 [+ or -] 3 *(b)

PVRI            M   248 [+ or -] 92          243 [+ or -] 57 (a)
                E   187 [+ or -] 91          183 [+ or -] 72 (b)

RVSWI           M   0.11 [+ or -] 0.03 *     0.12 [+ or -] 0.04 *
                E   0.12 [+ or -] 0.03 *     0.11 [+ or -] 0.04 *

pH              M   -                        7.34 [+ or -] 0.03 *
                E   -                        7.35 [+ or -] 0.03 *

PaC[O.sub.2]    M   -                        38.0 [+ or -] 4.4 *
                E   -                        37.0 [+ or -] 4.7 *

                G   T75                    T90

HR              M   121 [+ or -] 18        129 [+ or -] 17 (a)
                E   105 [+ or -] 1         108 [+ or -] 20 (b)

MAP             M   89 [+ or -] 13 *       93 [+ or -] 15
                E   88 [+ or -] 13         92 [+ or -] 14

SVRI            M   2877 [+ or -] 531      2899 [+ or -] 611
                E   2533 [+ or -] 561      2806 [+ or -] 856

LVSWI           M   1.00 [+ or -]          1.03 [+ or -]
                    0.16 *(a)              0.16 * (a)
                E   1.36 (b) [+ or -]      1.36 (b) [+ or -]
                    0.37                   0.37

mPAP            M   11 [+ or -] 4          12 [+ or -] 3 (a)
                E   8 [+ or -] 3 *         9 [+ or -] 3 * (b)

PVRI            M   236 [+ or -] 49        233 [+ or -] 42
                E   177 [+ or -] 76        184 [+ or -] 82

RVSWI           M   0.12 [+ or -] 0.04 *   0.13 [+ or -] 0.02 *
                E   0.13 [+ or -] 0.04 *   0.12 [+ or -] 0.05 *

pH              M   -                      7.35 [+ or -] 0.03 *
                E   -                      7.35 [+ or -] 0.02 *

PaC[O.sub.2]    M   -                      36.9 [+ or -] 4.9 *
                E   -                      36.6 [+ or -] 3.8 *

* statistically significant difference from T-10, Dunnet's test
(P<0,05). (a,b) in the columns, indicate a different value
between the groups, paired t test (P<0,05).
COPYRIGHT 2013 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Correa, Andre Luis; Tamanho, Renato Batista; de Moraes, Aury Nunes; Beier, Suzane Lilian; Regalin, D
Publication:Ciencia Rural
Date:Jun 1, 2013
Words:4158
Previous Article:Fermentative enzymes activity in soybean roots and nodules under hypoxia and post-hypoxia conditions/Atividade de enzimas fermentativas em raizes e...
Next Article:Animal and vegetal production of a natural pasture under different forage allowances for cattle/Producao animal e vegetal em pastagem nativa manejada...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters