Printer Friendly

Evaluation of skeletal variations and establishment of Cephalometric Norms in Saudi Sub Population using Bjork Jarabak's analysis.

Byline: Ibrahim Alshahrani, Muhammad Abdullah Kamran, Ali Alhaizaey and Noura Abumelha


Objective: To evaluate the skeletal variations amongst individuals and to compare the measurements with the standardized linear and angular values of Bjork Jarabak's analysis.

Methods: This study was conducted at POS Department, King Khalid University on 100 adult Saudi patients recruited through convenience sampling. It was conducted between April to September 2017, had inclusion criteria of patients between the age group 17 to 22 years showing normal occlusion. After history and examinations, lateral cephalographs were taken, scanned and traced using Dolphin Imaging Software and Cephalometric points were recognized. Linear and angular dimensions were calculated according to Bjork-Jarabak's method.

Results: Analysis and assessment of Saudi male and female values revealed considerable variation in the anterior and posterior cranial base lengths (p<0.05), anterior and posterior face height, ramus height, and mandibular length. Male measurements in contrast to Jarabak's values showed noteworthy variances in articular angle, anterior and posterior cranial base, ramus height, length of mandible, anterior face height and Jarabak's ratio. Female dimensions in relation to Jarabak's norms showed considerable variances in articular angle, anterior cranial base, posterior facial height with less significant values in Saudi females while compared with Jarabak's norms apart from mandibular body length which is more in Saudi females.

Conclusion: Skeletal variations amongst Saudi males and females were significant and comparison with standardized linear and angular values of Bjork Jarabak's analysis was also significant.

KEYWORDS: Face, Cephalometry, Population, Male, Female.


Cephalometric radiography was introduced by Broadbent and Hofrath in 1931 and since then it is widely used as an essential tool in clinical orthodontics for the study of malocclusion and skeletal structure and research orthodontics by researchers.1 A cephalometric radiograph and cephalometric norms plays a significant role in assessing the anteroposterior jaw relation,2 class of occlusion,3 growth prediction4 and act as a substantive tool in Orthodontics which aids Orthodontic clinicians and research workers in the formulation of final treatment plan.5 An ethnic group is a nature or populations that shares the same geographic boundary, language or culture and are either historically or racially related.5 Diverse ethnic and cultural collection of people have dissimilar facial and dental distinctiveness that justify the role of cephalometric standards for every racial group.

Majority cephalometric studies have demonstrated that the 'norms' should be based on ethnic, sex and age differences.6 Studies revealed that the Saudi people has discrete facial and dental appearance when compared with European and American people, as established by diverse analysis.7 Arne Bjork practiced dentistry from 1937 to 1951. He gave seven structural signs to determine the mandibular growth rotations. He constructed a facial diagram to determine the distribution of facial pragmatism using the linear and angular measurements. The plane of reference used by him was the SN plane.8 Jarabak's cephalometric investigation was based on the foundation of the exploratory research of Bjork. A facial diagram (polygon) consisting of linear and angular configurations determining the extent of facial prognathous, makes up the Bjork Jarabak's Analysis.4

One of the basic troubles in orthodontic management is prediction of growth. particularly, Jarabak effort with fragment of the dentofacial complex to judge the association of these section and how they amplify the standard development of any person. Some studies done previously on Saudi population comprises of small sample size and they have suggested that prospective cephalometric researches on Saudi population from diverse areas of the Saudi kingdom are desirable to confirm the result offered in their study with better sample amount.9,10 Therefore, this study was planned to analyze the craniofacial pattern of Saudi adults cephalometrically, to evaluate the skeletal variations amongst individuals and to compare the measurements with the standardized linear and angular values of Bjork Jarabak's analysis.


This cross-sectional study involved the collection and analysis of lateral cephalometric radiographs done at the department of pediatric and orthodontics, King Khalid University and was conducted on 100 non-growing Saudi patients including 50 males and 50 females. The duration of the study was 6 months from April to September 2017. A sample size of 100 patients was recruited through Raosoft software, in which margin of error was 5%, confidence interval of 95%, population size of 134 and response distribution of 50%. The inclusion criterion was patients who consented for the study having age group 17 to 22 years old having normal occlusions as based on the British standards institute (Williams and Stephens, 1992).

A normal occlusion fulfill the requirements of aesthetics and of function with class I incisor relationship (lower incisor edges occlude with or lie immediately below the cingulum plateau of upper central incisors), subjects that had no previous orthodontic treatment, little or no incisor crowding, no skeletal abnormality, full dentition from second molar to second molar, No craniofacial malformation or syndromes, no history of trauma and whose both parents and grandparents are Saudis. The exclusion criterion was patients who did not gave consent for the study. All the patients were recruited through convenience sampling. After taking history, informed verbal consent and examination, the patients were referred to the radiology department for lateral cephalography and orthopantomography. Every lateral cephalometric radiograph was captured under standardized conditions that is occluded teeth, lips in rest position and head in natural head posture by an experienced radiographer.

Every radiograph was scanned into a digital system by means of Epson perfection 4990 photo scanner (Seiko Epson Corporation, Nagano, Japan). The digital tracing was carried out using Dolphin Imaging Software Version 11 (Dolphin Imaging and Management, Chatsworth, CA). The computer analysis software was attuned for the intensification issue by a calibration procedure which includes recognition of identified distance linking two points of the Dolphin ruler on the tracing monitor. Cephalometric markers were identified (Fig.1 and Table-I). Linear and angular measurements were measured according to the Bjork-Jarabak's Method (Bjork1947, Jarabak et al. 1972) (Fig.1) and the inaccuracy/ intra examiner trustworthiness was resolute by taking haphazardly selected 25 radiographs at one-month interval, devoid of references to previous tracings. All measurements were recorded on a predesigned proforma.

Control of Error: To control the error in tracings and measurements Dalhberg's formula (sprigate, 2012) was applied. ME = s (x1-x2)2/2nWhere x1 = the first measurement, x2 = the second measurement, and n = number of repeated records (Houston WJB, 1983) Twenty-five lateral cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected traced and measured at 1-month interval to determine the difference between two readings.

Statistical Analysis: All the data was recorded and analyzed statistically using SPSS 20 with confidence level set at 5% (P < 0.05). Descriptive analysis including mean and standard deviations were obtained. Independent t-test was applied to compare the difference among both the sexes and the difference between Pakistani adults and standard Bjork Jarabak's value.

Table-I: Showing cephalometric measurements of jarabak's analysis.


Angular measurements(Adeg)

1. Saddle angle: N-S-AR###Measured at the angle between anterior and posterior cranial base.

2. Articular angle: S-AR-GO###Measured at the angle between posterior cranial base and ramus height.

3. Gonial angle: AR-GO-ME###Measured at the angle between ramus height and mandibular plane.

4. Upper gonial angle: AR-GO-N###Measured at the angle between ramus height and Gonion

###constructed-Nasion line

5. Lower gonial angle: N-GO-ME###Measured at the angle between Gonion constructed-Nasion line

###and mandibular plane

6. Jarabak Sum###Sum of angles (Saddle angle + Articular angle + Gonial angle)

Linear measurements(mm)

1. Anterior cranial base: S-N###A linear distance from Sella to Nasion.

2. Posterior cranial base: S-AR###A linear distance from Sella to Articulare.

3. Ramus height: AR-GO###A linear distance from Articulare to Gonion constructed.

4. Anterior facial height: N-ME###A linear distance from Nasion to Menton.

5. Posterior facial height S -GO:###A linear distance from Sella to Gonion constructed.

6. Mandibular body length. GO-ME###A linear distance from Gonion to Menton

###Proportional measurements (%)###A ratio of the Posterior and Anterior facial height.

###% Jarabak Facial Proportion:

Table-II: Showing statistical significance of different variables of Jarabak Analysis.


Saddle angle###0.8724

Articular angle###0.7391

Gonial angle###0.8373

Total sum###0.1358

Ant cranial base###*0.0001

Post cranial base###*0.0025

Ramus height###*0.0001

Mandibular body length###*0.0100

Post. facial height###*0.0001

Ant. facial height###*0.0001

Jarabak ratio###0.988

Table-III: Statistical difference between Jarabak's norms and Saudi males mean.

Variable###Jarabak norms Mean +-SD###Saudi males Mean +- SD###P value

Saddle Angle###123.0 +- 6###125.650 +- 5.163###0.8724

Articular angle###143.0 +- 5###139.806 +- 6.302###0.0076

Gonial Angle###130.0 +- 6###130.412 +- 6.413###0.5217

Total Sum###396.0 +- 5###395.932 +- 4.604###0.9920

Posterior Cranial Base###32mm +- 3###34.18 +-5.591###0.0162

Anterior Cranial Base###71 mm +- 3###74.644 +-4.851###0.0001

Ramus height###44mm +- 5###49.340 +-4.797###0.0001

Mandibular body length###71mm +- 5###78.327 +- 6626###0.0001

Posterior facial height###77.5 +- 7.5###78.448 +- 7.090###0.3066

Anterior facial height###112.5+- 7.5###120.608 +- 6.009###0.0001

Jarabak ratio###63.51 +-1.5###65.04 +- 3###0.0016

Table-IV: Statistical difference between Jarabak's norms and Saudi Females mean.

Variable###Jarabak norms Mean +- SD###Saudi females Mean +- SD###P value

Saddle Angle###123 +- 6###125.842 +- 6.661###0.7337

Articular angle###143 +- 5###139.328 +- 7.916###0.0066

Gonial Angle###130 +- 6###130.182 +- 4.134###0.9802

Total Sum###396 +- 5###397.302 +- 4.504###0.1744

Posterior Cranial Base###32 +- 3###31.11 +- 4.241###0.2286

Anterior Cranial Base###71 +- 3###68.08 +- 4.851###0.0001

Ramus height###44 +- 5###44.250 +- 5.597###0.8143

Mandibular body length###71 +- 5###74.970 +- 6.135###0.0006

Posterior facial height###77.5 +- 7.5###72.020 +- 6.192###0.0001

Anterior facial height###112.5 +- 7.5###112.118 +- 6.099###0.7805

Jarabak ratio###63.5 +- 1.5###64.28 +- 3###0.2944


The results of test of level of error revealed that the combined errors for any of the variables were small (less than 0.24 mm for linear measurements and 0.36 degree for angular measurements) and were within acceptable limit. Descriptive statistics (Means and standard deviation) of craniofacial morphology of Saudi adults are shown in Fig.3. Evaluation of gender difference among Saudis revealed considerable variation in the anterior and posterior cranial base lengths whereas males have superior anterior and posterior face height, ramus height, and mandibular length (p<0.05) (Table-II). The means and standard deviations of angular and linear measurements for Saudi males and females contrast with Jarabak's norms are presented in Table-III and Table-IV.

On comparison of cephalometric dimensions of males as contrast to Jarabak's norms exposed noteworthy dissimilarity in the articular angle, Anterior cranial base, posterior cranial base, ramus height, mandibular length, Anterior facial height and Jarabak's ratio with greater values in Saudi males as compared to Jarabak's norms (Table-III). Comparison of findings of females as compared to Jarabak's norms exposed remarkable differences in the articular angle, anterior cranial base, posterior facial height and mandibular body length. All values were lesser in Saudi females when compared with Jarabak's norms except mandibular body length which is more in Saudi females (Table-IV).


The results of this study revealed significant difference in most of the variables. Many aspects for example sex, age, ethnic origin, as well as face type, add to facial differences. Overlay on these aspects are individuality which is specific to every person. Since such innate differences are different for every population, values developed for any population should be used only as orientation line and not as complete standards to which all the persons in that population should match and be labeled as "normal".11 Perception of an appealing face is basically subjective by means of ethnicity, age, gender, culture, and personality influencing average facial traits12 and different races and ethnic groups have different dental facial pattern thus making cephalometric norms specific to particular ethnic group.13

Earlier cephalometric researches performed on Saudi population with reasonable contour and standard occlusion revealed that Saudis have extra protrusive dental and facial distinctiveness in contrast to North Americans and British Caucasian persons.14,15 Al-Jasser16 performed two researches which compares Saudi students and North Americans Caucasians in accordance with Steiner's and Down's analyses. It was revealed that Saudi population have different dental and facial characteristics. Al Barakati and Talic17 recognized cephalometric norms in accordance with McNamara's investigations and evaluate their statistics to values of North Americans and Europeans. It was accomplished that Saudis had class II facial profile as compare to North Americans and Europeans. In additon Saudis have additional protrusive dental and alveolar configuration.

This research suggests that there was only significant increase among the males in the linear measurements in comparison to females whereas angular measurements didn't show any difference between the two genders which is supported by another study in Saudi population by Nabeel F Talic And Sahar F. Al-Barakati18 and Wei19 and Foo20 who found that in Chinese and Malaysian population respectively, most of the linear measurements were significantly greater in males in comparison to females however in Bangladeshi population there were more significant difference among angular measurements between both the sexes. Bjork stated that during growth Anterior Facial Height (AFH) should be approximately 2.3 mm/ year and Posterior Facial Height (PFH) should2.9 mm/year i.e posterior growth slightly greater than anterior growth. Typical growth of TMJ is anticlockwise as the glenoid fossa and condylar growth surpass anterior vertical growth, thus pushing the symphysis forward.

In brachy facial individuals this imbalance is greater and clockwise growth is characteristic of dolichofacial subjects.14 Outcome of the present research revealed that Saudi males have considerably more anterior face height in comparison with Jarabak's values. Judgment of anterior face height is imperative while taking into consideration hyper divergent profiles preceding to treatment planning of orthodontic and/or orthognathic treatments. Comparable outcomes be established by AlBarakati and Talic, which notified the prototype of rearward and downward rotation of the mandible and propensity near a class II prototype amongst the Saudi population.17This can elucidate greater anterior face height detected in current study Saudi adults PFH/AFH ratio is on the higher side of Jarabak norms for Caucasians resulting in slightly more increase in AFH and downward and backward growth of symphysis.

Which is opposite in Pakistani population where PFH/AFH ratio is slightly greater than Caucasians resulting in slightly more increase in PFH and greater advancement of symphysis.20 A study carried out on Japanese-Brazilian descendants it was reported that they also had greater PFH/AFH ratio in comparison to Caucasians.21 Nada Mahdi Hussein Alhussiny22 in Iraqi population found that most of the linear measurements according to Jarabak analysis are greater in Iraqi males compared to Iraqi females and Caucasians which is also supported by our study. At the same time Iraqi females showed greater length of the mandible, posterior cranial base length and articular angle in comparison with Iraqi males whereas our study reported that Saudi Females have lesser above mentioned values than Saudi males.

Abdullah M. Aldrees23 in his meta-analysis on lateral cephalometric norms found that Saudis have a greater tendency towards Class II facial pattern and more convex profile than Caucasians which is in favor of our study results. Dr. Eman I Salama, et al24 in their study on Sudan population reported that there was noteworthy sexual characteristics difference in upper and lower anterior facial heights. There is increased upper and lower anterior facial height in males as compared to females which is like Egyptians and Saudis as confirmed by our study. Mona A Abbassy and Amal Abushal25 in their study reported that Saudi females tended to have a more vertical mandibular growth pattern than Japanese which is supported by our study. It has been evaluated from the results of the study and it substantiate the idea that Saudi males and females have distinct cranial and facial appearance when compared to Caucasians.

The use of cervical vertebral maturation along with other biological assessment measures can also help to predict the pattern of mandibular growth.26 These separate facial appearances should be kept in mind when orthodontists and orthognathic surgeons lay down their management rationales. It is recommended that further longitudinal multicenter studies with large sample size should be planned in order to bring the results more representative of the population. Orthodontists should consider the specific features of Saudi population while planning their treatment.

Limitations of the study: It has small sample size and cross sectional design.


The skeletal variations i.e. anterior and posterior cranial base lengths, anterior and posterior face height, ramus height, mandibular length amongst Saudi males and females were significant and comparison with the standardized linear and angular values of Bjork Jarabak's analysis was also significant.

Conflict of Interest: None

Grant support and Financial Disclosure: None.


1. Purmal K, Alam MK, ZamZam NM. Cephalometric norms of Malaysian adult Chinese. Int Med J. 2013;20(1):87-91.

2. Purmal K, Alam MK, ZamZam NM. Cephalometric comparison of skeletal, Dental, Soft tissue, Nose and Chin prominence between Malaysian Indian Malaysian Chinese. Int Med J. 2013;20(1):335-341.

3. Mohammad HA, Abu Hassan MI, Hussain SF. Cephalometric evaluation for Malaysian Malay by Steiner analysis. Scient Res Essays. 2011;6:627-634.

4. Qamruddin I, Shahid F, Firzok H, Maryam, Tanwir A. Beta angle: A cephalometric analysis performed in a sample of Pakistan population. J Pak Dent Assoc. 2012;21(4):206-209.

5. Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J. Craniofacial morphology of Bangladeshi adult using Tweed's and Wit's analysis. Int Med J. 2013;20(2):197-200.

6. Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J. Determining cephalometric norms for Bangladeshi adult using Bjork-Jarabaks' analysis. Int Med J. 2012;19(4):329-332.

7. Khan F, Mahroof V, Kamran A, Shafiqullah, Alam MK, Qamruddin I. Cephalometric Lip Morphology in a Sample from Pakistani Population. Int Med J. 2017;24(1):140-143.

8. Wua JYC, Hagg U, Wong RWK, McGrath C. Comprehensive cephalometric analyses of 10 to 14-year old Southern Chinese. Open Anthropol J. 2010;3:85-89. doi: 10.2174/1874912701003010085

9. Asbell MB, Hill C. A brief history of orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;98:206-213.

10. Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J. Cephalometric evaluation for Bangladeshi adult by Steiner's analysis. Int Med J. 2012;19(3):262-265.

11. AlBarakati S. The wits appraisal in a Saudi population sample. Saudi Dent J. 2002;14:89-92.

12. Gregoret J. Orthodontics and orthognathic surgery diagnosis and treatment planning, 2003; Ch.6: 113-120.

13. Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J. Determining cephalometric norms for Bangladeshi adult using Bjork-Jarabaks' analysis. Int Med J. 2012;19:329-332.

14. Kamran AK, Shahbaz S, Kashif M. Assessment of Periapical Root Resorption after Six Months of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment. ASH and KMDC. 2016;21(1):42-47.

15. Mandall NA, McCord JF, Blinkhorn AS, Worthington HV, O'Brien KD. Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self-perceptions in 14-15-year-old Asian and Caucasian children in Greater Manchester. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22(2):175-183.

16. Al Jasser N. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variation in normal Saudi population according to Steiner analysis. Saudi Med J. 2000;21:746-750.

17. Al Barakati S, Talic N. Cephalometric norms for Saudi sample using McNamara analysis. Saudi Dent J. 2007;19:139-145.

18. Nabeel FT, Barakati SF. cephalometric measurements of a Saudi adult sample according to Jarabak's analysis; Pak Oral Dent J. 2009;29(2):281-286.

19. WeiSHY. A roentgenographic cephalometric study of prognathism in Chinese males and females. Angle Orthod. 1986;38:305-320.

20. Foo GC. A cephalometric study of Chinese in profile, Aust Orthod J. 1968;9:285-288.

21. Vieira FP, Pinzan A, Janson G, Fernandes TMF, Sathler RC, Henriques RP. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion. Dent Press J Orthod. 2014S;19(5):54-66. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.054-066.

22. Hussein NM, Al hussiny. Cephalometric Measurements and Morphological Evaluation for Head and face of an Iraqis adult for cephalic x-ray. Eng Tech. J. 2015;33(2):346-372.

23. Abdullah M. Aldrees. Lateral cephalometric norms for Saudi adults: A meta-analysis. Saudi Dent J. 2011;23(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.09.002.

24. Salama EI, Abuaffan AH. Cephalometric Hard and Soft Tissue Norms for Sudanese Adults. Orthod J Nepal. 2015;5(2):28-32.

25. Abushal AM. Class I malocclusion in Saudi and Japanese. J Orthod Sci. 2015;4(3):86-91.

26. Ball G, Woodside D, Tompson B, Hunter WS, Posluns J. Relationship between cervical vertebral maturation and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:(5):455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.035
COPYRIGHT 2018 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Oct 31, 2018
Previous Article:Sociodemographic Characteristics as Predictors of Satisfaction in Public and Private Dental Clinics.
Next Article:Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic surgery combined with triptorelin acetate in patients with endometriosis and infertility.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |