Printer Friendly

Evaluation of Sperm Chromatin Integrity Using Aniline Blue and Toluidine Blue Staining in Infertile and Normozoospermic Men.


Male factor has been implicated in about 50% of the infertile cases (1). An estimated 15% of men with normal basic sperm analysis have been associated with infertility (2, 3). Success rates of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) depend mostly on the structural and functional integrity of the gametes and have a decisive role. Current techniques employed in the field of andrology can be improved by the addition of a new tests for assessment of semen quality (4). It is evident from current studies that sperm chromatin defect is due to many reasons, which are associated with decreased fertilization rate and poor ART outcomes (5) and the higher incidence of pregnancy loss (6). Sperm chromatin carries also half of the genomic material to offspring and the integrity of sperm chromatin has fundamental importance for balanced transmission to future generations (7).

Subjectivity and variability of traditional semen parameters, abnormalities in the male genome, maybe disturbed chromatin packaging and sperm DNA are the conditions that disturb standard semenparameters (8-10). Inconsistently reports showed sperm chromatin screening was essential to infertility diagnosis (11). Normal and fertile donors were found to have lower levels of chromatin defects when compared to men receiving fertility services (12).

Sperm DNA integrity can be assayed in methods such as single cell electrophoresis or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) directly (13) and techniques such as sperm chromatin structural assay (SCSA) and chromomycine A3 (CMA3) indirectly. These methods necessitate the provision of expensive apparatus and they are often inaccessible to most andrology lab in IVF centers (14). Since abnormal chromatin integrity is more frequent in infertile men than fertile men, some techniques have been developed to evaluate sperm chromatin integrity status referred as cytochemical assays including aniline blue (AB) and toluidine blue (TB) staining tests (15-17).

These methods are based on the ability of some stains to assess the conformation of sperm chromatin, which in turn depends on DNA interaction with proteins (18, 19). The AB stain discriminates between lysine-rich histones and arginine/cysteine-rich protamines. This method provides a specific positive reaction for lysine and reveals differences in the basic nuclear protein composition of human spermatozoa (20, 21). TB is a basic nuclear dye used for metachromatic staining of the chromatin. The phosphate residues of sperm DNA in nuclei with loosely packed chromatin or impaired DNA become more prone to binding with basic TB dye, providing a metachromatic alteration due to dimerization of the dye molecules from light blue to purple-violet (22, 23). So far, these tests were introduced as simple, fast, and accurate for the analysis of sperm chromatin integrity. In addition, these methods do not require complex instrumentation (3). A significant difference and a wide range of chromatin defect were observed already between normal donors and patients with asthenozoospermia and oligoasthenozoospermia by using acridine orange (24). However, the correlation of AB and TB test with sperm count, motility, morphology and the assessment of sperm chromatin status are not well noted in different subfertile men.

With focusing on the chromatin integrity, evidence suggests a negative relationship between the incompetence of the chromatin material in sperm chromatin and the fertility potential of spermatozoa (25). Therefore, chromatin integrity can be measured as a reliable predictor of a couple's ability to conceive. So, the objective of the present investigation was to evaluate semen samples for the status of sperm chromatin to find the relationship of the chromatin integrity with conventional sperm quality parameters in normozoospermia and different groups of subfertile men by using AB and TB tests.


This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. In this retrospective study, the medical archives of 1386 couples referring to research and clinical center for infertility treatment between April 2011 to December 2016 were revised. Records of sperm from men who had undergone infertility treatment were reviewed. 342 men were normospermia whose partners were infertile and 1044 were infertile including idiopathic ones or the individuals affected by oligoasthenospermia, asthenospermia, and oligospermia. Patients with lack of sufficient clinical data and patients with testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or other surgical sperm retrieval were excluded from our study.

All specimens were collected by masturbation at the andrology laboratory, after an abstinence period of 2-3 days. After complete liquefaction at room temperature and before the semen preparation, the following characteristics were observed according to WHO guidelines: ejaculate volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count and motility (26). For each measurement, a 10 [micro]l aliquot from the semen sample was loaded into a microcell chamber (Conception technologies, San Diego, CA) and analyzed for sperm concentration and motility. Seminal smears were stained with Diff-Q uick stain and sperm morphology was assessed according to WHO criteria. 10 [micro]l of the sample was taken on a slide and smear was prepared. Based on Diff-quik commercial kits Hemacolor[R] (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) slides was kept for air drying and the slides were immersed in fixative (95% ethanol) for 15 seconds and the excess solution was drained by placing slides vertically on absorbent paper. The slides were immersed sequentially in step 1 to Eosin for 10 s and in step 2 in Methylene Blue for 5 s. Then the slides were rinsed briefly in tap water to remove excess stain and kept for air dry. Each slide was examined withoil immersionat x1000 magnification in bright field microscopy (27).

Aniline blue staining: To perform this staining, fresh sperm smear of each case was air dried and then fixed in 3% buffered glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH=7.2) for 30 min at room temperature. Each smear was treated with 5% aqueous AB stain (BDH, Poole, UK, Cat. No. 34003) 5 g powder in 100 ml distilled water) in 4% acetic acid (pH=3.5) for 5 min. At least, 200 spermatozoa were counted in each slide by light microscopy (28). Unstained or pale blue stained cells and dark blue cells were considered normal and abnormal spermatozoa, respectively. At least 200 sperm cells were evaluated in each slide and the percentage of abnormal spermatozoa was reported.

Toluidine blue staining: To do this staining, after air drying of smears, they were fixed in fresh 96% ethanol-acetone (1:1) at 4[degrees]C for 30 min and then hydrolyzed in 0.1 NHCl at 4[degrees]C for 5 min. The slides were rinsed thrice in distilled water for 2 min and finally stained with 0.05% TB in 50% McIlvaine buffer (pH=3.5) for 10 min at room temperature (29). The chromatin quality of spermatozoa was determined according to metachromatic staining of sperm heads with the aid of light microscopy at x1000 magnification. Pale blue sperm heads were considered as normal and dark blue or violet or purple spermatozoa were categorized in to abnormal cells.

Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago. IL, USA). Regarding the analysis of semen parameters, a nonparametric test was used because of the large range of values. Statistical tests including non parametric Mann-Whitney U tests to determine the relationships between sperm parameters in two study groups, Kruskal-Wallis for multiple comparisons and spearman's rank correlation for comparison of measured parameters were applied as well. Data is presented as mean[+ or -] SD, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval: Data collection and document review in this study were in accordance with the standards of the Ethics Committee of the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


Our data analysis showed that the mean age of the men in our study groups didn't differ significantly, 37.8[+ or -]4.2 in fertile patients vs. 35.1[+ or -]5.6 in infertile patients (p=0.098). Mean of the ejaculation volume was 3.8[+ or -]1.5 in normozoospermic men and 3.4[+ or -]1.2 in infertile group and they were not significantly different (p=0.078). The semen parameters were analyzed in all the patients according to WHO criteria.

As listed in table 1, percentages of sperm count, normal morphology and progressive motility in idiopathic infertility are lower than normospermia but they are higher than subfertile groups. Also percentage of sperm with abnormal AB and TB staining was higher in idiopathic infertility compared to normospermia but it was higher than other infertile subgroups.

As shown in table 2, there is a negative correlation between sperm chromatin integrity with sperm count, normal morphology and progressive motility.

Table 3 shows a negative correlation between sperm count and sperm with abnormal AB and TB staining in all groups but the correlation was significant just in idiopathic patients.

Also, a negative correlation exists between normal morphology and sperm with abnormal AB staining in all infertile groups and the correlation is significant except in oligoasthenozoospermia.


Semen analysis was done for normozoospermia and infertile groups and the results show a high significant difference (p=00.1) between two groups (Table 1). In total participants, chromatin results of AB and TB staining were correlated to sperm parameters (Table 1) and a negative correlation between sperm chromatin integrity and maturity with sperm count, normal morphology and progressive motility was observed (Table 2). These results are in line with Ali et al.'s study that recorded a high significant difference in sperm decondensation between fertile and infertile men by AB and TB tests. Also, they revealed a high significant negative association between sperm AB (+ )and TB (+) with sperm morphology, concentration and progressive motility (30). Although Hammadeh et al. reported a significant difference between patients and healthy donors by AB staining, they found no correlation between chromatin maturity with sperm morphology, count and motility (31). However, in another study, a significant association between chromatin condensation with strict morphology by AB and TB staining was found (22). Sellami et al. found a significant correlation between sperm chromatin maturity and the average number of sperm head abnormalities in infertile men by AB test but they didn't find any correlation with sperm motility, vitality, and count (20). In another study, investigators reported a negative correlation between AB (+) sperm cells with sperm morphology and progressive motility (32).

AB and TB staining results and sperm parameters were similar in normozoospermic men and idiopathic individuals. So, the etiology of chromatin defect should be sought in other factors like the aberration in protamine or apoptosis rather than the excess of histone or lower sperm condensation in male idiopathic infertility. In idiopathic cases, sperm parameters correlated with the chromatin results. Talebi et al. investigated the possible contribution of sperm in recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA); they assessed semen quality of a group of male patients whose partners had at least three repeated abortions following natural conception. AB and TB staining results revealed that majority of samples in RSA patients exhibited high percentages of abnormal spermatozoa than cut off values regarding different cytochemical assays (33). Perhaps the difference between their report and ours is related to the fact that some participants who were classified as idiopathic were not typical cases of idiopathic infertility, for the reason that the current study is retrospective. Although the results of AB staining have shown a clear relationship between abnormal sperm chromatin condensation and male infertility (34), the correlation between the percentage of AB staining reacted spermatozoa and other sperm parameters remains controversial (35-37). Talebi et al. showed the results of analysis of sperm chromatin condensation and DNA integrity status using different assays between different experimental diabetic groups in mice. There were significant differences between groups regarding TB staining test, but there was not any significant difference in AB staining (38).

Most important is the finding that chromatin integrity as visualized by AB or TB staining is a predictor for ART outcomes, although these cannot determine the fertilization potential and the cleavage and pregnancy rates following ICSI (21, 39). In AB staining, basic proteins are loosely associated with DNA and unable to bind to the chromatin of normal sperm which is densely packed. A transition of histones to more basic protamines occurring during spermiogenesis neutralizes DNA charge and decreases the absorbing DNA-specific dyes (20, 22).

TB staining may be considered a quite reliable method to assess sperm chromatin. However, in normal sperm, the polymerization of the dye is stopped (40) and abnormal sperm may impair dye binding and polymerization. Looser chromatin has looser interactions with chromatin proteins, which can be easily displaced from the DNA in favor of metachromatic binding of the dye to DNA phosphate groups (41).

Abnormal nuclei as purple-violet sperm heads have been shown to be correlated with results by the acridine orange method. Moreover, correlations between the results of the TB staining, SCSA, and TUNEL tests have been verified (42).

AB staining cut-off at 6% normal morphology were 90% specificity and 62% sensitivity (28) and TB. TB staining threshold for the proportion of cells with violet heads was set at 45%, it provides 92% specificity and 42% sensitivity for male infertility detection (43).


In the present study, a negative correlation existed between sperm chromatin integrity with sperm count, normal morphology and progressive motility by TB and AB staining, cut-off value in specificity and sensitivity of AB and TB staining was considered as a predictor for male infertility. So, the AB and TB test may be useful for the assessment of male fertility potential. Also, through focusing on the chromatin integrity, our data suggest a negative relationship between the incompetence of chromatin material and fertility potential of spermatozoa; chromatin integrity assessment by using AB and TB can be as a reliable predictor of conception in different subfertile groups.


The authors thank the staff from the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran, for their skillful technical assistance during the course of this study. The study was supported financially by Research Deputy of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial or nonfinancial conflicts of interest.


(1.) Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37.

(2.) Lewis SE, Agbaje I, Alvarez J. Sperm DNA tests as useful adjuncts to semen analysis. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2008;54(3):111-25.

(3.) Evgeni E, Charalabopoulos K, Asimakopoulos B. Human sperm DNA fragmentation and its correlation with conventional semen parameters. J Reprod Infertil. 2014;15(1):2-14.

(4.) Varghese A, Bragais F, Mukhopadhyay D, Kundu S, Pal M, Bhattacharyya A, et al. Human sperm DNA integrity in normal and abnormal semen samples and its correlation with sperm characteristics. Andrologia. 2009;41(4):207-15.

(5.) Lewis S, Aitken R. DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;322(1):33-41.

(6.) Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(12): 2663-8.

(7.) Pourmasumi S, Ghasemi N, Talebi AR, Mehrabani M, Sabeti P. The effect of vitamin E and selenium on sperm chromatin quality in couples with recurrent miscarriage. Int J Med Lab. 2018;5(1):1-10.

(8.) Sivanarayana T, Krishna CR, Prakash GJ, Krishna K, Madan K, Sudhakar G, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation assay by sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD): correlation between DNA fragmentation and outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Med Biol. 2014;13(2):87-94.

(9.) Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(4):331-45.

(10.) Pourmasumi S, Sabeti P, Rahiminia T, Mangoli E, Tabibnejad N, Talebi AR. The etiologies of DNA abnormalities in male infertility: An assessment and review. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2017;15 (6):331-44.

(11.) Emelyanov AV, Fyodorov DV. Thioredoxin-dependent disulfide bond reduction is required for protamine eviction from sperm chromatin. Genes Dev. 2016;30(24):2651-6.

(12.) Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA[R]) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1289-95.

(13.) Sergerie M, Laforest G, Boulanger K, Bissonnette F, Bleau G. Longitudinal study of sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by terminal uridine nick end-labelling assay. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(7): 1921-7.

(14.) Mehta A, Sigman M. Identification and preparation of sperm for ART. Urolc Clin North Am. 2014;41 (1):169-80.

(15.) Talebi A, Vahidi S, Aflatoonian A, Ghasemi N, Ghasemzadeh J, Firoozabadi R, et al. Cytochemical evaluation of sperm chromatin and DNA integrity in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Andrologia. 2012;44 Suppl 1: 462-70.

(16.) Talebi AR, Khalili MA, Vahidi S, Ghasemzadeh J, Tabibnejad N. Sperm chromatin condensation, DNA integrity, and apoptosis in men with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(2):140-6.

(17.) Sabeti P, Amidi F, Kalantar SM, Sedighi Gilani MA, Pourmasumi S, Najafi A, et al. Evaluation of intracellular anion superoxide level, heat shock protein A2 and protamine positive spermatozoa percentages in teratoasthenozoospermia. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2017;15(5):279-86.

(18.) Evenson DP. The sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA[R]) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;169: 56-75.

(19.) Practice committee of the American society for reproductive medicine. The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(3):673-7.

(20.) Sellami A, Chakroun N, Ben Zarrouk S, Sellami H, Kebaili S, Rebai T, et al. Assessment of chromatin maturity in human spermatozoa: useful aniline blue assay for routine diagnosis of male infertility. Adv Urol. 2013;2013:578631.

(21.) Irez T, Sahmay S, Ocal P, Goymen A, Senol H, Erol N, et al. Investigation of the association between the outcomes of sperm chromatin condensation and decondensation tests, and assisted reproduction techniques. Andrologia. 2015;47(4):438-47.

(22.) Kim HS, Kang MJ, Kim SA, Oh SK, Kim H, Ku SY, et al. The utility of sperm DNA damage assay using toluidine blue and aniline blue staining in routine semen analysis. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2013;40(1):23-8.

(23.) Hamidi J, Frainais C, Amar E, Bailly E, Clement P, Menezo Y. A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index. Zygote. 2015;23(4): 556-62.

(24.) Varghese AC, Bragais FM, Mukhopadhyay D, Kundu S, Pal M, Bhattacharyya AK, et al. Human sperm DNA integrity in normal and abnormal semen samples and its correlation with sperm characteristics. Andrologia. 2009;41(4):207-15.

(25.) Sabeti P, Pourmasumi S, Rahiminia T, Akyash F, Talebi AR. Etiologies of sperm oxidative stress. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2016;14(4):231-40.

(26.) World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human

semen. 5th ed. Switzerland: WHO press; 2010. 287 p.

(27.) Abdulla M, Ahmed M, Barakat A. Comparison of Swim Down and Density Gradient Sperm Preparation Methods in Terms of Motility, Morphology and DNA Fragmentation. Am J Life Sci Res. 2015; 3(2):169-77.

(28.) Franken DR, Franken CJ, de la Guerre H, de Villiers A. Normal sperm morphology and chromatin packaging: comparison between aniline blue and chromomycin A3 staining. Andrologia. 1999;31 (6):361-6.

(29.) Erenpreisa J, Erenpreiss J, Freivalds T, Slaidina M, Krampe R, Butikova J, et al. Toluidine blue test for sperm DNA integrity and elaboration of image cytometry algorithm. Cytometry A. 2003;52(1):19-27.

(30.) Al-Fahham AA, Al-Sultani YK, Muhammad-Ali AK. Using Sperm chromatin Staining Techniques as a Predictive Diagnostic Tool for Male Infertility. Kufa J Nursing Sci. 2014;4(2):56-64.

(31.) Hammadeh M, Zeginiadov T, Rosenbaum P, Georg T, Schmidt W, Strehler E. Predictive value of sperm chromatin condensation (aniline blue staining) in the assessment of male fertility. Arch Androl. 2001;46(2):99-104.

(32.) Kazerooni T, Asadi N, Jadid L, Kazerooni M, Ghanadi A, Ghaffarpasand F, et al. Evaluation of sperm's chromatin quality with acridine orange test, chromomycin A3 and aniline blue staining in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26(11-12):591-6.

(33.) Talebi AR, Vahidi S, Aflatoonian A, Ghasemi N, Ghasemzadeh J, Firoozabadi RD, et al. Cytochemical evaluation of sperm chromatin and DNA integrity in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Andrologia. 2012;44 Suppl 1: 462-70.

(34.) Muratori M, Tamburrino L, Marchiani S, Cambi M, Olivito B, Azzari C, et al. Investigation on the origin of sperm DNA fragmentation: role of apoptosis, immaturity and oxidative stress. Mol Med. 2015;21:109-22.

(35.) Talebi AR, Sarcheshmeh AA, Khalili MA, Tabibnejad N. Effects of ethanol consumption on chromatin condensation and DNA integrity of epididymal spermatozoa in rat. Alcohol. 2011;45(4):403-9.

(36.) Talebi AR, Moein MR, Tabibnejad N, Ghasemzadeh J. Effect of varicocele on chromatin condensation and DNA integrity of ejaculated spermatozoa using cytochemical tests. Andrologia. 2008; 40(4):245-51.

(37.) Talebi AR, Khalili MA, Hossaini A. Assessment of nuclear DNA integrity of epididymal spermatozoa following experimental chronic spinal cord injury in the rat. Int J Androl. 2007;30(3):163-9.

(38.) Rahimipour M, Talebi AR, Anvari M, Sarcheshmeh AA, Omidi M. Effects of different doses of ethanol on sperm parameters, chromatin structure and apoptosis in adult mice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):423-8.

(39.) Simon L, Liu L, Murphy K, Ge S, Hotaling J, Aston K, et al. Comparative analysis of three sperm DNA damage assays and sperm nuclear protein content in couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(5):904-17.

(40.) Dada R, Kumar BS, Kumar M, Oberoi AS, Shamsi MB. Sperm DNA damage assessment: techniques and relevance in male infertility diagnostics. In: Talwar CP, editor. Manual of cytogenetics in reproductive biology. India: Jaypee Brothers meical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2014. p. 135-43.

(41.) Pourentezari M, Talebi AR, Mangoli E, Anvari M, Rahimipour M. Additional deleterious effects of alcohol consumption on sperm parameters and DNA integrity in diabetic mice. Andrologia. 2015; 48(5):564-9.

(42.) Ribas-Maynou J, Garcia-Peiro A, Fernandez-Encinas A, Abad C, Amengual M, Prada E, et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology. 2013;1(5):715-22.

(43.) Tsarev I, Bungum M, Giwercman A, Erenpreisa J, Ebessen T, Ernst E, et al. Evaluation of male fertility potential by Toluidine Blue test for sperm chromatin structure assessment. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(7):1569-74.

Soheila Pourmasumi (1), Arezoo Khoradmehr (2), Tahereh Rahiminia (3), Parvin Sabeti (4), Ali Reza Talebi (2*), Jalal Ghasemzadeh (2)

1- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran

2- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

3- Gametogenesis Research Center, Fertility, and Infertility Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

4- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

(*) Correspondi ng Aut hor: Ali Reza Talebi, Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd, Iran


Received: Aug. 26, 2018

Accepted: Nov. 10, 2018
Table 1. Sperm parameters in normospermia group and infertile sub

Sperm            Normozoospermic     Infertile
parameters       n=342               n=1044

Count (x106)     94.33[+ or -]48.22  73.55[+ or -]54.96
Motility (%)
Progressive      59.52[+ or -]8.04   44.61[+ or -]15.71
Non progressive  10.61[+ or -]3.1    13.16[+ or -]4.95
Immotile         29.59[+ or -]5.91   42.4[+ or -]17.39
Morphology       39.17 [+ or -]9.24  16.76[+ or -]10.75
AB               49.75[+ or -]18.45  54.29[+ or -]19.12
TB               58.95[+ or -]20.78  62.52[+ or -]20.06

Sperm            Idiopathic          Oligo spermia
parameters       infertile ones      n=13

Count (x106)     88.41[+ or -]54.22  10.00[+ or -]3.10
Motility (%)
Progressive      52.39[+ or -]7.75   47.84[+ or -]4.50
Non progressive  12.4[+ or -]3.31    13.84[+ or -]2.99
Immotile         35.57[+ or -]11.63  39.07[+ or -]5.58
Morphology       18.64[+ or -]11.00  14.69[+ or -]9.60
AB               51.35[+ or -]18.9   67.76[+ or -]14.41
TB               60.95[+ or -]21.00  69.76[+ or -]12.63

Sperm            Asthenospermia      Oligoasthenospermia
parameters       n=184               n=93

Count (x106)     50.09[+ or -]34.66   8.34[+ or -]4.20
Motility (%)
Progressive      25.90[+ or -]10.92  18.11[+ or -]12.67
Non progressive  16.5[+ or -]7.1     12.55[+ or -]7.68
Immotile         56.99[+ or -]14.28  69.35[+ or -]19.13
Morphology        3.63[+ or -]8.30    8.01[+ or -]6.65
AB               58.71[+ or -]17.91  67.49[+ or -]15.54
TB               64.17[+ or -]17.9   71.00[+ or -]13.79

Sperm            p-value between
parameters       groups

Count (x106)     0.001
Motility (%)
Progressive      0.001
Non progressive  0.001
Immotile         0.001
Morphology       0.001
AB               0.001
TB               0.001

Note: Values are presented by mean[+ or -] SD. AB= Aniline blue
staining, TB= Toluidine blue staining. Relationships between sperm
parameters in normospermia and infertile groups were determined with
the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Also, P-value obtained from
thedifference between means innormospermia and infertile sub groups
was tested for significance, by Kruskal-wallis one way ANOVA on ranks
and post hoc analysis was performed using Dunn's for all pair- wise
comparisons. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant

Table 2. Correlation between sperm parameters with sperm nuclear
maturity tests

Sperm parameters      Correlation coefficient  p

Count (x[10.sup.6])   -0.262  (**)             0.001
Motility (%)
Progressive           -0.249 (**)              0.001
Non progressive        0.078 (**)              0.001
Immotile               0.258 (**)              0.001
Morphology (%normal)  -0.237 (**)              0.001
Count (x[10.sup.6])   -0.147  (**)             0.001
Motility (%)
Progressive           -0.249 (**)              0.001
Non progressive        0.088 (**)              0.001
Immotile               0.127 (**)              0.001
Morphology (%normal)  -0.107 (**)              0.001

Note. AB= Aniline blue staining, TB= Toluidine blue staining.
Spearman'snonparametric correlation coefficient was calculated for
data that were not normally distributed.
(**) Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

Table 3. Correlation between semen parameters and sperm chromatin
quality tests based on study groups

Sperm parameters
                             AB      TB

Count (x106)              R  -0.095  -0.098
                          p   0.080   0.070
Progressive motility      R   -.080  -0.118 (*)
                          p   0.139   0.029
Non progressive motility  R   0.025   0.113 (*)
                          p   0.649   0.037
Immotile motility         R   0.084   0.065
                          p   0.121   0.233
Morphology(% normal)      R  -0.050  -0.027
                          p   0.353   0.621

Sperm parameters          individuals
                          AB           TB

Count (x106)              -0.244 (**)  -0.144 (**)
                           0.001        0.001
Progressive motility      -0.248 (**)  -0.132 (**)
                           0.001        0.057
Non progressive motility   0.048        0.068
                           0.121        0.062
Immotile motility          0.213 (**)   0.037
                           o.oo1        0.313
Morphology(% normal)      -0.229 (**)  -0.995
                           0.001        0.001

Sperm parameters          infertile in dividuals
                          AB           TB

Count (x106)              -0.157 (**)  -0.092 (*)
                           0.001        0.011
Progressive motility      -0.141 (**)  -0.069
                           0.001        0.057
Non progressive motility   0.050        0.068
                           0.168        0.062
Immotile motility          0.080 (*)    0.037
                           0.029        0.313
Morphology(% normal)      -0.132 (**)  -0.995
                           0.001        0.001

                          Oligospermia         Asthenospermia
Sperm parameters
                          AB           TB      AB           TB

Count (x106)              -0.061       -0.040  -0.031       -0.052
                           0.842        0.896   0.673        0.486
Progressive motility      -0.405        0.08    0.050        0.006
                           0.170        0.086   0.500        0.941
Non progressive motility  -0.099       -0.358  0-.046        0.017
                           0.747        0.230   0.534        0.815
Immotile motility          0.361        0.149   0.032        0.023
                           0.225        0.627   0.665        0.761
Morphology(% normal)      -0.735 (**)  -0.205  -0.273 (**)  -0.095
                           0.004        0.501   0.001        0.202

perm parameters            spermia
                          AB       TB

Count (x106)               0.105    0.061
                           0.317    0.561
Progressive motility       0.042    0.024
                           0.687    0.816
Non progressive motility  -0.024   -0.103
                           0.819    0.324
Immotile motility         -0.020    0.025
                           0.850    0.808
Morphology(% normal)      -0.199   -0.050
                           0.056    0.631

AB=Aniline blue staining, TB=Toluidine blue staining. Spearman's
nonparametric correlation coefficient was calculated for data that
were not normally distributed. (*) Correlation is significant at the
0.05 level (2-tailed), (**) Correlation is significant at the 0.01
level (2-tailed)
COPYRIGHT 2019 Avicenna Research Institute
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Pourmasumi, Soheila; Khoradmehr, Arezoo; Rahiminia, Tahereh; Sabeti, Parvin; Talebi, Ali Reza; Ghase
Publication:Journal of Reproduction and Infertility
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2019
Previous Article:Can Amlodipine Improve the Pre-ovulatory Follicle Blood Flow in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome?
Next Article:Home Delivery Practices and Associated Factors in Ethiopia.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters