Printer Friendly

Evaluation of Serum Endocan Levels in Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

INTRODUCTION

Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is known to be a major debilitating factor for subjects at any age. It is usually considered as age-related, noise-induced, or idiopathic. To date, several theories, such as viral diseases, immune-mediated processes, and vascular compromise, have been proposed to explain the underlyng mechanisms leading to hearing loss [1-4]. Among the proposed theories, diminished blood supply to the inner ear secondary to microvascular endothelial dysfunction has gained increasing acceptance. According to the literature, endothelial dysfunction is triggered or induced by several factors, such as redox protein p66, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVACM-1), factor V Leiden polymorphism, prothrombin G20210A variants, and P2X4 activation [5-8].

In a study by Cox et al. [9], endocan, a novel serum endothelial cell-specific molecule 1, was found to be a more reliable marker than its predecessors in determining the severity of experimentally induced endothelial dysfunction. The implication of endocan in the diagnosis and prognosis of several other endothelial dysfunction-associated diseases has been well-documented [10, 11]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the association between serum endocan levels and presence or severity of SNHL has not been investigated.

To reveal the possible role of endothelial dysfunction in SNHL, we aimed to determine the serum endocan levels of patients with varying degrees of SNHL and compared them with those of healthy subjects. We also discussed the implications of the study findings under the scope of the existing literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary research setting between February and May 2017. Patients with a known history of chronic inflammatory condition, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, ischemic heart disease, stroke, uncontrolled hypertension, malignancy, chronic otitis media, or any metabolic disorder were excluded from the study. Despite a negative medical history, patients with a documented abnormality in blood biochemistry, including high fasting glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, and creatinine levels, were also excluded from the study. In addition, a recent history of glucocorticoids, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, or any ototoxic medications use was also accepted as an exclusion criterion due to its potential impact on endocan synthesis and metabolism.

All pure tone thresholds were measured by the same senior audiometrist in a high-standard silent audiometry cabin. For the testing, a two-channel audiometer was used (Interacoustics AC 40, Denmark). Prior to the audiometric analysis, all the subjects underwent an otoscopic examination, and those with abnormal otoscopic findings were excluded. Patients with documented SNHL (total, 89; 42 female and 47 male) and 25 healthy controls (14 female and 11 male) were included in the study. Patients with SNHL had varying degrees of hearing loss and were classified as having mild (n=27; 12 female, 15 male), moderate (n=31; 19 female, 12 male), or severe (n=31; 11 female, 20 male) SNHL according to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) guideline [12]. The mean ages of the control, mild, moderate, and severe SNHL groups were 57.420, 57.221, 58.640, and 58.114 years, respectively. The control subjects were enrolled as healthy volunteers following pure tone threshold testing. Informed consent of all the subjects who were enrolled in the study was obtained. The research ethics committee of Namik Kemal University granted ethics approval to conduct this research (Date: 26/01/2017; No: 2017/16).

Following overnight fasting, blood samples were collected from the patients and controls. The antecubital vein was used to draw blood samples, which were then collected into vials containing 3.8% sodium citrate in a proportion of 9:1. Whole blood samples were centrifuged at 300 rpm, and plasma samples were obtained. The samples were stored at -86[degrees]C. The serum endocan levels were measured using Elabscience ELISA kit (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd, WuHan, China). The intra- and inter-assay variabilities of the ELISA kit were 6.36% and 6.09%, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

For the statistical analysis of the data, PASW Statistics for Windows version 18 was used. Categorical variables were expressed as the mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage. For the comparison of variables that showed a normal distribution, analysis of variance (ANO-VA) was used. For the comparison of the subgroups, the Tukey test was used. The associations between variables were tested using the Pearson correlation analysis. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean serum endocan levels of patients in the control and study groups are summarized in Table 1. The comparison of the subgroups showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the severe SNHL and other groups (p<0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the control, mild SNHL, and moderate SNHL groups (p>0.05; Table 2). Despite the gradually increasing hearing loss observed in the mild and moderate SNHL groups compared with the control group, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05; Figure 1). However, the serum endocan levels in the severe SNHL group were higher than those in the other groups, and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). A post hoc power analysis along with one-way ANOVA indicated that the groups had 97%-99% power, with an alpha value of 1% (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

Endocan is a proteoglycan derived from the endothelium and has been recently discovered by Lassalle et al. [13] in 1996 as a new human endothelial cell-specific molecule. The molecule ESM-1 was found to be specifically distributed in the vascular endothelial cells, and subsequent studies identified it as a novel member of the proteoglycan family and named it as endocan [14]. Ongoing studies have shown that endocan can be isolated not only from the vasculature of the lung tissue but also from the adipose tissue, skin, and heart [15-17].

Endocan can bind a number of biologically active molecules that participate in cellular migration, adhesion, and proliferation. The roles of endocan in healing, inflammation, and tumorigenesis have been previously documented [18, 19]. A literature review revealed that serum endocan level was a reliable marker for both the diagnosis of various diseases and surveillance of their post-therapeutic responses [20, 21].

In a recent study, Lv et al. [17] proposed that serum endocan levels could be used as a useful marker for the early diagnosis of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Moreover, in his review, Azimi et al. [21] pointed out the role of endocan as a reliable marker for renal tubular injury and suggested it to be a potential equivalent of troponin in the field of nephrology. Furthermore, the prognostic implication of endocan in triple negative breast cancer was evaluated in a study by Sagara et al. [22], who concluded that endocan could be used as a blood-based biomarker for patients with breast cancer. In another study, serum and urinary levels of endocan were found to be higher in patients with bladder cancer [23].

To reveal the role of endocan in various clinical settings associated with endothelial dysfunction, including endotoxemia, obstructive sleep apnea, and migraine, numerous studies have been performed [24-26]. Elevated levels of endocan have been found to be associated with disease severity.

From an otorhinolaryngological point of view, the possible role of endothelial dysfunction in SNHL has been investigated in the literature. In their study, Berjis et al. [27] concluded that endothelial dysfunction is associated with SNHL. They also emphasized that this association was independent of other cardiovascular risk factors [27]. The reversal of peripheral endothelial dysfunction by rheopheresis in patients with SNHL was found to be beneficial in a study by Balletshofer et al. [28], in which patients with SNHL showed endothelial dysfunction evidenced by diminished flow-mediated vasodilatation.

Specifically, the role of soluble adhesion molecules in the pathogenesis of idiopathic sudden SNHL was investigated in two prospective studies. Ramunni et al. [29] hypothesized that the reduction of adhesion molecule levels by low-density lipoprotein-apheresis could have a role in the treatment of SNHL. In another study, Quaranta et al. [30] evaluated 37 patients with sudden SNHL and indicated the role of elevated sICAM-1 and sVACM-1 levels in these patients.

Although many studies have shown such an association, some studies have denied the role of endothelial dysfunction in SNHL. Haubner et al. [31] reported that they did not observe any increase in the serum levels of endothelial dysfunction markers, including ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in patients with SNHL. They denied the presence of an association of vascular endothelia dysfunction with hearing loss and concluded that further studies should be conducted to elucidate the role of vascular endothelial dysfunction in this disorder [31]. sICAM1, sVCAM-1, E-selectin, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 levels were not significantly elevated in the patient group. Despite the findings of other researches, Haubner's study revealed no association between sudden SNHL and typical vascular risk factors. Soluble adhesion molecule levels were not elevated in the ISSHL group. The study concluded that the association between increased levels of soluble adhesion molecules and SNHL pathogenesis remains unclear.

The possible role of endothelial dysfunction in SNHL has been previously suggested; however, to the best of our knowledge, the implication of the novel endothelial dysfunction marker endocan has not been previously investigated. Endocan is accepted as one of the most potent immune inflammatory markers for the diagnosis and surveillance of many endothelial disorders. Endocan is known to have a crucial role in cell adhesion regulation, and increased levels in the plasma are associated with endothelial dysfunction [32]. The null hypothesis of the present study was that the possible association between SNHL and endothelial dysfunction could be clearly demonstrated using the novel and reliable marker endocan in patients with varying degrees of SNHL. Serum endocan levels were found to be increased in the mild and moderate SNHL groups compared with the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the severe SNHL group showed a statistically significant difference compared with the control group.

The secretion of endocan is restricted to the endothelial cells, and preanalytical variations may be observed when samples are collected at different time intervals following endothelial cell injury. The onset of hearing loss ranged from 6 months to 10 years in our study, which may be considered a limitation. Further studies with more homogenous study groups would be more convenient in evaluating the impact of endothelial dysfunction.

Senility alone can negatively affect endothelial dysfunction, which in turn contributes to organ failure [33]. The aging process is also associated with neurodegenerative disorders, which may independently be a risk factor for SNHL [34, 35]. The relatively small size of the control and study groups and the relative shift toward increasing age of the study population may also be considered as limitations of this study.

CONCLUSION

A statistically significant difference was observed in the serum endocan levels of patients with severe SNHL compared with other groups in this study. This finding would support the substantial implication of endothelial dysfunction in SNHL. Further clinical researches with larger populations should be conducted to delineate the significance of this association. A better understanding of the underlying processes in the pathogenesis of SNHL may be beneficial for both the prevention and treatment of the disorder.

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the ethics committee of Namik Kemal University (Date: 26/01/2017; No: 2017/16).

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from patients who participated in this study.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept--E.G., Z.C.; Design--E.G., Z.C.; Supervision--E.G., Z.C.; Resources--T.E., O.B.D., B.T.; Materials--O.B.D., O.K.; Data Collection and/or Processing--T.E., O.B.D., O.K., B.T.; Analysis and/or Interpretation--E.G., Z.C., T.E.; Literature Search--O.B.D., T.E., Z.C.; Writing Manuscript--E.G., Z.C.; Critical Review--E.G., Z.C.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

REFERENCES

[1.] Yang D, Zhang JN, Zhou HF. Endothelial progenitor cells in patients with age-related hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 2014; 35: 695-8. [CrossRef]

[2.] Yamasoba T, Lin FR, Someya S, Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Kondo K. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res 2013; 303: 30-8. [CrossRef]

[3.] Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet 2014; 383: 1325-32. [CrossRef]

[4.] Rossini BAA, Penido NO, Munhoz MSL, Bogaz EA, Curi RS. Sudden Sensorioneural Hearing Loss and Autoimmune Systemic Diseases. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 21: 213-23. [CrossRef]

[5.] Fetoni AR, Eramo SL, Paciello F, Rolesi R, Samengo D, Paludetti G, et al. The redox protein p66(shc) mediates cochlear vascular dysfunction and transient noise-induced hearing loss. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 25450. [CrossRef]

[6.] Haubner F, Martin L, Steffens T, Strutz J, Kleinjung T. The role of soluble adhesion molecules and cytokines in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144: 575-80. [CrossRef]

[7.] Spiezia L, Vasques F, Bovo R, Martini A, Simioni P. Role of factor V Leiden polymorphism or G20210A prothrombin variant in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a meta-analysis of the literature. Thromb Res 2015; 135: 565-7. [CrossRef]

[8.] Wu T, Dai M, Shi XR, Jiang ZG, Nuttall AL. Functional expression of P2X4 receptor in capillary endothelial cells of the cochlear spiral ligament and its role in regulating the capillary diameter. Am J Physiol Heart CircPhysiol 2011; 301: H69-78. [CrossRef]

[9.] Cox LA, van Eijk LT, Ramakers BP, Dorresteijn MJ, Gerretsen J, Kox M, et al. Inflammation-induced increases in plasma endocan levels are associated with endothelial dysfunction in humans in vivo. Shock 2015; 43: 322-6. [CrossRef]

[10.] Altintas N, Mutlu LC, Akkoyun DC, Aydin M, Bilir B, Yilmaz A, et al. Effect of CPAP on new endothelial dysfunction marker, endocan, in people with obstructive sleep apnea. Angiology 2016; 67: 364-74. [CrossRef]

[11.] Bilir B, Ekiz Bilir B, Yilmaz I, Soysal Atile N, Yildirim T, Kara SP, et al. Association of apelin, endoglin and endocan with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20: 892-8.

[12.] Clark JG. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA 1981; 23: 493-500.

[13.] Lassalle P, Molet S, Janin A, Heyden JV, Tavernier J, Fiers W, et al. ESM-1 is a novel human endothelial cell-specific molecule expressed in lung and regulated by cytokines. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 20458-64. [CrossRef]

[14.] Bechard D, Gentina T, Delehedde M, Scherpereel A, Lyon M, Aumercier M, et al. Endocan is a novel chondroitin sulfate/dermatansulfate proteoglycan that promotes hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor mitogenic activity. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 48341-9. [CrossRef]

[15.] Orbegozo D, Rahmania L, Irazabal M, Mendoza M, Annoni F, De Backer D, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Endocan as an early biomarker of severity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7: 93. [CrossRef]

[16.] Zhang SM, Zuo L, Zhou Q, Gui SY, Shi R, Wu Q, et al. Expression and distribution of endocan in human tissues. Biotech Histochem 2012; 87: 172-8. [CrossRef]

[17.] Lv Y, Zhang Y, Shi W, Liu J, Li Y, Zhou Z, et al. The association between endocan levels and subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med Sci 2017; 353: 433-8. [CrossRef]

[18.] Lee W, Ku SK, Kim SW, Bae JS. Endocan elicits severe vascular inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Physiol 2014; 229: 620-30. [CrossRef]

[19.] Scherpereel A, Gentina T, Grigoriu B, Senechal S, Janin A, Tsicopoulos A, et al. Overexpression of endocan induces tumor formation. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 6084-9.

[20.] Tadzic R, Mihalj M, Vcev A, Ennen J, Tadzic A, Drenjancevic I. The effects of arterial blood pressure reduction on endocan and soluble endothelial cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) and CAMs ligands expression in hypertensive patients on Ca-channel blocker therapy. Kidney Blood Press Res 2013; 37: 103-15. [CrossRef]

[21.] Azimi A. Could "calprotectin" and "endocan" serve as "Troponin of Nephrologists"? Med Hypotheses 2017; 99: 29-34. [CrossRef]

[22.] Sagara A, Igarashi K, Otsuka M, Kodama A, Yamashita M, Sugiura R, et al. Endocan as a prognostic biomarker of triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 161: 269-78. [CrossRef]

[23.] Hu ZD. Serum and urinary endocan levels for bladder cancer diagnosis. Ann Clin Biochem 2016; 53: 717. [CrossRef]

[24.] Cox LA, van Eijk LT, Ramakers BP, Dorresteijn MJ, Gerretsen J, Kox M, et al. Inflammation-induced increases in plasma endocan levels are associated with endothelial dysfunction in humans in vivo. Shock 2015; 43: 322-6. [CrossRef]

[25.] Kanbay A, Ceylan E, Koseoglu Hi, Caliskan M, Takir M, Tulu S, et al. Endocan: A novel predictor of endothelial dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Clin Respir J 2018; 12: 84-90. [CrossRef]

[26.] Yucel M, Kotan D, Gurol Ciftci G, Ciftci IH, Cikriklar HI. Serum levels of endocan, claudin-5 and cytokines in migraine. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20: 930-6.

[27.] Berjis N, Moeinimehr M, Hashemi SM, Hashemi SM, Bakhtiari EK, Nasiri S. Endothelial dysfunction in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Adv Biomed Res 2016; 5: 5. [CrossRef]

[28.] Balletshofer BM, Stock J, Rittig K, Lehn-Stefan A, Braun N, Burkart F, et al. Acute effect of rheopheresis on peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients suffering from sudden hearing loss. Ther Apher Dial 2005; 9: 385-390. [CrossRef]

[29.] Ramunni A, Quaranta N, Saliani MT, Fallacara RA, Ria R, Ranieri G. Does a reduction of adhesion molecules by LDL-apheresis have a role in the treatment of sudden hearing loss? Ther Apher Dial 2006; 10: 282-6. [CrossRef]

[30.] Quaranta N, Ramunni A, Brescia P, D'Elia A, Vacca A, Ria R. Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 in sudden hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 470-4. [CrossRef]

[31.] Haubner F, Martin L, Steffens T, Strutz J, Kleinjung T. The role of soluble adhesion molecules and cytokines in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144: 575-80. [CrossRef]

[32.] Balta S, Mikhailidis DP, Demirkol S, Ozturk C, Celik T, Iyisoy A. Endocan: A novel inflammatory indicator in cardiovascular disease? Atherosclerosis 2015; 243: 339-43. [CrossRef]

[33.] Chang F, Flavahan S, Flavahan NA. Impaired activity of adherens junctions contributes to endothelial dilator dysfunction in ageing rat arteries. J Physiol 2017; 595: 5143-58. [CrossRef]

[34.] Tarantini S, Tran CHT, Gordon GR, Ungvari Z, Csiszar A. Impaired neurovascular coupling in aging and Alzheimer's disease: Contribution of astrocyte dysfunction and endothelial impairment to cognitive decline. Exp Gerontol 2017; 94: 52-8. [CrossRef]

[35.] Frisina RD, Ding B, Zhu X, Walton JP. Age-related hearing loss: prevention of threshold declines, cell loss and apoptosis in spiral ganglion neurons. Aging (Albany NY) 2016; 8: 2081-99. [CrossRef]

Erdogan Gultekin [iD], Tolga Ersozlu [iD], Oral Burak Demirel [iD], Ozlem Kaymaz [iD], Birol Topcu [iD], Zafer Ciftci [iD]

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey (EG, TE, OBD, ZC)

Department of Biochemistry, Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey (OK)

Department of Biostatistics, Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Tekirdag, Turkey (BT)

Corresponding Author: Erdogan Gultekin E-mail: erdogangultekin@hotmail.com

Submitted: 22.12.2017 * Revision Received: 26.02.2018 * Accepted: 02.03.2018 * Available Online Date: 15.10.2018

ORCID IDs of the authors: E.G. 0000-0002-8017-3854; T.E. 0000-0001-8629-6022; O.B.D. 0000-0001-7066-2294; O.K. 0000-0001-5710-3316; B.T. 0000-0003-0771-2505; Z.C. 0000-0003-3307-085X.

Cite this article as: Gultekin E, Ersozlu T, Demirel OB, Kaymaz O, Topcu B, Ciftci Z. Evaluation of Serum Endocan Levels in Sensorineural Hearing Loss. J Int Adv Otol 2019; 15(1): 83-6.

DOI: 10.5152/iao.2018.5051
Table 1. Mean serum endocan levels in the control and the study groups
(ng/mL)

         Group           n   Mean[+ or -]sd        (p)

Endocan  Control         25  4.400.62             0.001
         Mild SNHL*      27  4.440.73
         Moderate SNHL*  31  4.550.51
         Severe SNHL*    31  6.150.65 (a1,b1,c1)

(a) Comparison of control and severe SNHL groups.
(b) Comparison of mild and severe SNHL groups.
(c) Comparison of moderate and severe SNHL groups.
(1) p<0.01
SNHL: Sensorineural hearing loss

Table 2. Tukey Multiple Comparison results

                                                        95%
                                                        Confidence
                                                        Interval
(I) grup  (J) grup   Mean              Std.Error  Sig.  Lower Bound
                     Difference (I-J)

Control   Mild        -.04150          .17589     .995   -.5003
          Moderate    -.14898          .17034     .818   -.5934
          Severe     -1.74837 (*)      .17034     .001  -2.1927
Mild      Control      .04150          .17589     .995   -.4173
          Moderate    -.10749          .16682     .917   -.5427
          Severe     -1.70687 (*)      .16682     .001  -2.1420
Moderate  Control      .14898          .17034     .818   -.2954
          Mild         .10749          .16682     .917   -.3277
          Severe     -1.59938 (*)      .16096     .001  -2.0193
Severe    Control     1.74837 (*)      .17034     .001   1.3040
          Mild        1.70687 (*)      .16682     .001   1.2717
          Moderate    1.59938 (*)      .16096     .001   1.1795

(*) The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Table 3. Post-hoc power analysis

Difference  Size  Power

3           25    0.978296
3           27    0.987082
3           31    0.995655
3           31    0.995655

[alpha]=0.01 Assumed standard deviation=2 d=3 Factors: 1 Number of
levels: 4
COPYRIGHT 2019 AVES
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Gultekin, Erdogan; Ersozlu, Tolga; Demirel, Oral Burak; Kaymaz, Ozlem; Topcu, Birol; Ciftci, Zafer
Publication:The Journal of the International Advanced Otology
Article Type:Report
Date:Apr 1, 2019
Words:3482
Previous Article:Auditory Reasoning Skills of Cochlear Implant Users.
Next Article:A Novel Approach for Classifying Native Chinese and Malay Speaking Persons According to Cortical Auditory Evoked Responses.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |