Printer Friendly

Estimating bacterial diversity in Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) via next generation sequencing.

Thrips, order Thysanoptera, are emerging as a globally important group of plant pests, damaging crops through direct feeding and transmission of tospoviruses and non-viral diseases (Morse & Hoddle 2006). Only a few hundred of the 5,500 identified thrips species are pests (Brunner et al. 2002), and of these, only 14 are documented virus vectors (Riley et al. 2011). Chilli thrips Scirtothrips dorsalis is both a virus vector (Chu et al. 2001; Meena et al. 2005; Gopal et al. 2010) and a pest of many crops around the world including tea (Saha & Mukhopadhyay 2013), mango (Aliakbarpour & Md. Rawi 2012; Choi et al. 2013), roses (Hegde et al. 2011; Mannion et al. 2013), and citrus (Gao et al. 2012; Hyun et al. 2012). It is a highly polyphagous species, feeding on >100 plant species in 40 different families, many containing important U.S. crops (Hodges et al. 2007; Kumar et al. 2013). S. dorsalis is globally invasive and has been established in Florida and Texas since 2005 (Mannion et al. 2013).

Bacterial associations with insects are ubiquitous and are often beneficial to the insect (Duron & Hurst 2013). Bacteria have been implicated in the manipulation of reproduction (Duron et al. 2008), body color (Tsuchida et al. 2010), disease transmission (Weiss & Aksoy 2009), development (Chouaia et al. 2012), and protection from parasites (Brownlie & Johnson 2009). Thrips on the whole have received little attention regarding this important aspect of arthropod ecology. Previous work has largely focused on the most frequently encountered bacterium (identified as a near-Erwinia species) within a single thrips species, the Western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (de Vries et al. 2001a; de Vries et al. 2001b; de Vries et al. 2004; de Vries et al. 2006; Chanbusarakum & Ullman 2008, 2009; de Vries et al. 2012) with a few studies on other species (Wells et al. 2002; Gitaitis et al. 2003; de Vries et al. 2008).

In this study, next generation semiconductor sequencing was conducted on invasive chilli thrips in Florida from which we present the first metagenomic survey of any thrips. This expands our understanding of the bacterial symbioses of thrips in general and is a first step toward a bacterial transfection biocontrol strategy for this important pest.


Next Generation Sequencing

A single DNA extraction from 97 adult and nymph S. dorsalis was made using a DNeasy[TM] Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen[TM], Valencia, California). Eluted DNA was concentrated to a volume of ~10 mL in a SpeedVac[TM] DNA 110 Concentrator (Savant, Farmingdale, New York), subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel, and high molecular weight genomic DNA (> 10Kb) was cut out and purified with a Nucleospin Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, Pennsylvania, USA). One hundred ng of purified DNA was used for library preparation using an Ion Xpress[TM] Plus Fragment Library Kit. End repair, adapter ligation, size selection, nick repair and amplification (16 cycles) were performed as described in the Ion Torrent protocol associated with the kit. 300 bp fragments were isolated using a SizeSelect 2% Gel in an E-Gel electrophoresis system (all Life Technologies, California, USA).

The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and the associated High Sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent Technologies, Englewood, Colorado) were used to determine quality and concentration of the library. The amount of library required for template preparation was calculated using the Template Dilution Factor calculation described in the protocol. Next-generation sequencing was conducted using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine using an Ion PGM 200 Sequencing kit following sequencing template preparation with the OneTouch[TM] 2 System and Ion PGM[TM] Template OT2 200 Kit according to manufacturer's instructions (all products: Life Technologies). The library was sequenced on a single Ion 318 semiconductor chip (Life Technologies) with a barcode.

Contig Assembly and Metagenomics

Contigs were assembled from the raw reads using the following parameters in Geneious v6; word length, 12; index word length, 11; maximum gap size, 5; maximum gaps per read, 10%; maximum mismatches, 5%; and maximum ambiguity, 16. Assembled contigs were compared against the NCBI nt database (Retrieved 9-XII-2012) and to a custom combined LSU and SSU Silva database (Release SSURef_111 and LSURef_111) (Quast et al. 2013) with BLASTN 2.2.27+ (Camacho et al. 2009) with an E-value of 1e-10 with BLAST data outputted in XML format. XML outputs from BLAST coupled with the corresponding assembly input data were provided as input to MEGAN v4.70.4 (Huson et al. 2011) and analyzed with default lowest common ancestor parameters. The minimum support filter was set to one ensuring rare taxa were represented. Contigs compared to the Silva database were mapped to taxa using the silva_2_ncbi roadmap. The taxonomic tree generated by MEGAN was manually parsed to present the data at the level of microbial Genus. To accomplish this, the tree was uncollapsed at the level of Genus, followed by the collapse of all non-microbial taxa at the level of Kingdom. Using the summarize feature of MEGAN the number of both direct and summed (assigned to a more specific taxon) contigs were exported in a tabular format, including non-microbial Kingdoms, microbial Genera, as well as nodes representing low complexity sequences, sequences which had no BLAST hit, and those not assigned to a given taxa. Contigs assigned to nodes below the Genus threshold and lost/not processed contigs were calculated using total reads in raw files, the number of reads placed in the MEGAN root taxon, and the total assigned to selected nodes. Summary data was exported to Microsoft Excel and graphed. A listing of the various implicated bacterial species is provided in supplementary material for this article in Suppl. Table 1 in Florida Entomologist 97(2) (2014) online at


The sequencing yield was 6,204,869 million raw reads averaging 164 bases. From these reads, 615,073 contigs were assembled averaging 483 bases. More than 99.99% of contigs were processed successfully through the metagenomics pipeline. 28,416 contigs were identified as having microbial origin and 189 bacterial genera were identified as the best match for a minimum of 4 different contigs (Table 1, Suppl. Table 1). The relative abundance of sequences from identified genera was highest for the phyla Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria (Fig. 1). This is consistent with the dominant bacterial phyla found for other animals (Jones et al. 2013).

Eight genera identified by this study have previously been associated with other thrips species. Erwinia, pantoea, Enterobacter, Serratia, Escherichia and pseudomonas have been identified internally from thrips (de Vries et al. 2001a; Gitaitis et al. 2003; Chanbusarakum & Ullman 2008; de Vries et al. 2008; de Vries et al. 2012). Erwinia herbicola and Enterobacter agglomerans have been synonymized with pantoea agglomerans so these 3 genera identified in chilli thrips could represent a single taxon found in association with several insects (Medina et al. 2011). agrobacterium, Methylobacterium, pseudomonas and Escherichia have been isolated from the exoskeleton of Sericothrips staphylinus (Yamoah et al. 2008).

Many of the genera identified by this study have members with documented insect associations (Table 1, Suppl. Table 1), though a thorough literature search on all 189 genera was not conducted. Notably absent from the list are heritable genera reported as globally common in insects by Duron & Hurst (2013), arsenophonus, Wolbachia, Rickettsia, Spiroplasma, and cardinium. In the 3 thrips species with literature records of endosymbiotic bacterial associations, it has generally been argued that the bacteria are facultative, and acquired from the environment through feeding (de Vries et al. 2001b; Gitaitis et al. 2003; de Vries et al. 2008). Our results suggest this may also be the case for S. dorsalis. In Frankliniella occidentalis, a geographically ubiquitous association with a near Erwinia species provisionally identified as pantoea agglomerans, is promoted behaviorally since thrips individuals prefer thrips-damaged leaves (de Vries et al. 2006). Future work should investigate whether any of the dominant bacteria identified in S. dorsalis could be maintained in a similar fashion as this could provide a mechanism for the spread of transfected bacteria through the thrips population for the purpose of biological control.

There are several factors limiting the inferences that can be drawn from this dataset. First, we are unable to distinguish internal symbionts from those associated with the surface of the insect or possible contaminants (see Hail et al. 2012). Second, we cannot gauge the bacterial communities of individuals or life-stages. Both of these limitations can be overcome within the context of this sequencing and bioinformatics framework at an increased cost. That being said, the abundance of genera identified in the order: Enterobacteriales and those with documented insect associations (Table 1, Suppl. Table 1) argue that many of the identified taxa are thrips associated.

Massively parallel, high throughput, primer independent sequencing has some benefits over bacterial culturing, traditional PCR with cloning, and target enriched next-generation sequencing for estimating bacterial diversity. It not only does away with the assumption of culturability, but also with the assumption of equivalent primer-template compatibility for all bacteria. As such, it has the ability to recover taxa that may not have been detected with primer dependent methods (Mao et al. 2012). The primer independent method presented here identified a large number of bacterial taxa, free of these assumptions, for an insect with no prior information about its microbiome.

Caption: Fig. 1. Relative abundance of dominant bacterial taxa in Scirtothrips dorsalis. Abundance based on 23,068 contigs classified to 189 genera (supplimental table). Genera were included if identified as the best match for >3 contigs.


Genus(# Matches)                               Phylum

Propionibacterium(5072) (1)                    Actinobacteria
Stenotrophomonas(3143) (1) ([double dagger])   Proteobacteria
Pseudomonas(2717) (1) ([double dagger])        Proteobacteria
Methylobacterium(827) (1) ([double dagger])    Proteobacteria
Ralstonia(614) (1)                             Proteobacteria
Streptococcus(455) (1) ([double dagger])       Firmicutes
Deinococcus(398) (1) ([double dagger])         Deinococcus-Thermus
Bradyrhizobium(350) (1) ([double dagger])      Proteobacteria
Enterobacter(338) (1) * ([double dagger])      Proteobacteria
Achromobacter(289) (1) ([double dagger])       Proteobacteria
Mycobacterium(286) (2)                         Actinobacteria
Nocardioides(275) (2)                          Actinobacteria
Rothia(270)                                    Actinobacteria
Sphingomonas(270) (1) ([double dagger])        Proteobacteria
Sphingobium(268) (3)                           Proteobacteria
Arthrobacter(244) (1)                          Actinobacteria
Acidovorax(238) (1)                            Proteobacteria
Burkholderia(233) (1)                          Proteobacteria
Agrobacterium(210) (1)                         Proteobacteria
Streptomyces(194) (1)                          Actinobacteria
Nakamurella(193)                               Actinobacteria
Rhodopseudomonas(186) (1)                      Proteobacteria
Novosphingobium(185) (1)                       Proteobacteria
Thermus(177)                                   Deinococcus-Thermus
Nostoc(161) (4)                                Cyanobacteria
Sphingopyxis(151)                              Proteobacteria
Geobacillus(138)                               Firmicutes
Microbacterium(121) (1)                        Actinobacteria
Corynebacterium(109) (1)                       Actinobacteria
Escherichia(108) (1) *                         Proteobacteria
Acinetobacter(107) (1) ([double dagger])       Proteobacteria
Anabaena(105) (2)                              Cyanobacteria
Chroococcidiopsis(89)                          Cyanobacteria
Klebsiella(89) (1) *                           Proteobacteria
Variovorax(93)                                 Proteobacteria
Bordetella(92) (1)                             Proteobacteria
Caulobacter(90) (3)                            Proteobacteria
Brevundimonas(87) (1)                          Proteobacteria
Azospirillum(81)                               Proteobacteria
Rhodobacter(80) (5)                            Proteobacteria
Alicycliphilus(79)                             Proteobacteria
Mesorhizobium(79) (2)                          Proteobacteria
Geodermatophilus(76)                           Actinobacteria
Delftia(75) (1)                                Proteobacteria
Cupriavidus(74) (3)                            Proteobacteria
Ramlibacter(74)                                Proteobacteria
Xanthomonas(72) (1)                            Proteobacteria
Rubrivivax(70) (5)                             Proteobacteria
Sinorhizobium(70) (2)                          Proteobacteria

(1-6) Genus previously documented associated with insects:
(1) (Minard et al. 2013), (2) (Hail et al. 2012), (3) (Shelomi
et al. 2012), (4) (Duron and Hurst 2013), (5) (Duguma et al.
2013), Reed and Hafner 2002)

* Order: Enterobacteriales

([double dagger]) Also hit in Silva database


Genus(# Matches)              Phylum
Micrococcus(68) (1)           Actinobacteria
Conexibacter(68) (3)          Actinobacteria
Bacillus(68) (1)              Firmicutes
Rhizobium(68) (1)             Proteobacteria
Modestobacter(66)             Actinobacteria
Phenylobacterium(66) (2)      Proteobacteria
Actinoplanes(65) (2)          Actinobacteria
Staphylococcus(63) (1)        Firmicutes
Pseudoxanthomonas(58) (1)     Proteobacteria
Erythrobacter(58) (5)         Proteobacteria
Cellulomonas(57) (2)          Actinobacteria
Rhodococcus(57) (1)           Actinobacteria
Clavibacter(56)               Actinobacteria
1* Serratia(56) (1) *         Proteobacteria
Pseudonocardia(55) (2)        Actinobacteria
Starkeya(55)                  Proteobacteria
Stanieria(53)                 Cyanobacteria
Leptothrix(52) (1)            Proteobacteria
Kribbella(51)                 Actinobacteria
Pantoea(49) (1) *             Proteobacteria
Dyadobacter(47)               Bacteroidetes
Gordonia(45) (6)              Actinobacteria
Intrasporangium(44)           Actinobacteria
Methylibium(44)               Proteobacteria
Nocardia(42) (1)              Actinobacteria
Blastococcus(38)              Actinobacteria
Frankia(38)                   Actinobacteria
Microlunatus(37)              Actinobacteria
Azoarcus(37) (6)              Proteobacteria
Nitrobacter(37)               Proteobacteria
Oligotropha(37) (2)           Proteobacteria
Anaeromyxobacter(36)          Proteobacteria
Paracoccus(36) (3)            Proteobacteria
Micromonospora(33) (1)        Actinobacteria
Rhodospirillum(33) (6)        Proteobacteria
Haemophilus(31) (1)           Proteobacteria

Acidiphilium(31)              Proteobacteria
Isoptericola(30) (2)          Actinobacteria
Anoxybacillus(30) ([dagger])  Firmicutes
Azotobacter(28)               Proteobacteria
Brachybacterium(26) (2)       Actinobacteria
Amycolatopsis(26)             Actinobacteria
Saccharothrix(26)             Actinobacteria
Calothrix(26) (1)             Cyanobacteria
Gloeocapsa(26)                Cyanobacteria
Neisseria(26) (1)             Proteobacteria
Azorhizobium(26)              Proteobacteria
Hyphomicrobium(26) (3)        Proteobacteria
Xanthobacter(26)              Proteobacteria

(1-6) Genus previously documented associated with insects:
(1) (Minard et al. 2013), (2) (Hail et al. 2012), (3)
(Shelomi et al. 2012), (4) (Duron and Hurst 2013), (5)
(Duguma et al. 2013), Reed and Hafner 2002)

* Order: Enterobacteriales

([dagger]) Also hit in Silva database


Genus(# Matches)          Phylum

Gemmatimonas(25)          Gemmatimonadetes
Thauera(25)               Proteobacteria
Saccharopolyspora(24)     Actinobacteria
Streptosporangium(24)     Actinobacteria
Polaromonas(24)           Proteobacteria
Kitasatospora(23) (6)     Actinobacteria
Actinosynnema(23)         Actinobacteria
Kineococcus(23)           Actinobacteria
Thermomonospora(23)       Actinobacteria
Xylanimonas(23)           Actinobacteria
Cylindrospermum(23)       Cyanobacteria
Cellvibrio(23)            Proteobacteria
Herbaspirillum(23) (1)    Proteobacteria
Pseudogulbenkiania(23)    Proteobacteria
Tistrella(23)             Proteobacteria
Beutenbergia(20)          Actinobacteria
Microcoleus(19) (3)       Cyanobacteria
Oscillatoria(19)          Cyanobacteria
Comamonas(19) (1)         Proteobacteria
Bifidobacterium(18) (4)   Actinobacteria
Sanguibacter(18) (3)      Actinobacteria
Cyanothece(18)            Cyanobacteria
Kocuria(17) (1)           Actinobacteria
Nocardiopsis(16)          Actinobacteria
Verrucosispora(16)        Actinobacteria
Lactococcus(16) (1)       Firmicutes
Chromobacterium(16) (1)   Proteobacteria
Thermobispora(15)         Actinobacteria
Azospira(15) (3)          Proteobacteria
Opitutus(15)              Verrucomicrobia
Flavobacterium(14) (1)    Bacteroidetes
Fibrella(14)              Bacteroidetes
Prevotella(14) (1)        Bacteroidetes
Lactobacillus(14) (1)     Firmicutes and
Sorangium(14)             Proteobacteria
Collimonas(14)            Proteobacteria
Thiobacillus(14)          Proteobacteria
Kytococcus(12)            Actinobacteria
Leifsonia(12)             Actinobacteria
Bacteroides(12) (1)       Bacteroidetes
Spirosoma(12)             Bacteroidetes
Exiguobacterium(12) (1)   Firmicutes
Corallococcus(12)         Proteobacteria
Myxococcus(12)            Proteobacteria

(1-6) Genus previously documented associated with
insects: (1) (Minard et al. 2013), (2) (Hail et
al. 2012), (3) (Shelomi et al. 2012), (4) (Duron
and Hurst 2013), (5) (Duguma et al. 2013), Reed
and Hafner 2002)

* Order: Enterobacteriales

([dagger]) Also hit in Silva database


Genus(# Matches)       Phylum

Crinalium(11)          Cyanobacteria
Faecalibacterium(11)   Firmicutes
Magnetospirillum(11)   Proteobacteria
Haliangium(10)         Proteobacteria
Aeromonas(10) (1)      Proteobacteria
Pelagibacterium(10)    Proteobacteria
Tsukamurella(9) (2)    Actinobacteria
Catenulispora(9)       Actinobacteria
Rubrobacter(9)         Actinobacteria
Niastella(9) (2)       Bacteroidetes
Eubacterium(9)         Firmicutes
Thiomonas(9)           Proteobacteria
Ochrobactrum(9) (3)    Proteobacteria
Chelativorans(9)       Proteobacteria
Ruegeria(9)            Proteobacteria
Erwinia(7) (1) *       Proteobacteria
Geobacter(7) (6)       Proteobacteria
Albidiferax(7)         Proteobacteria
Verminephrobacter(7)   Proteobacteria
Methylocella(7)        Proteobacteria
Parvibaculum(7) (2)    Proteobacteria
Methylocystis(7) (1)   Proteobacteria
Rhodomicrobium(7)      Proteobacteria
Granulicella(6)        Acidobacteria
Stackebrandtia(6)      Actinobacteria
Finegoldia(6)          Firmicutes
Cronobacter(6) *       Proteobacteria
Desulfovibrio(6)       Proteobacteria
Halomonas(6)           Proteobacteria
Shewanella(6) (1)      Proteobacteria
Thioalkalivibrio(6)    Proteobacteria
Rivularia(5)           Cyanobacteria
Ruminococcus(5)        Firmicutes
Veillonella(5)         Firmicutes
Planctomyces(5) (2)    Planctomycetes
Dickeya(5) *           Proteobacteria
Nitrosomonas(5)        Proteobacteria
Terriglobus(4) (8)     Acidobacteria
Salinispora(4)         Actinobacteria
Fluviicola(4) (5)      Bacteroidetes
Synechococcus(4) (4)   Cyanobacteria
Blautia(4)             Firmicutes
Coprococcus(4)         Firmicutes
Citrobacter(4) (1) *   Proteobacteria
Alcanivorax(4) (3)     Proteobacteria
Hyphomonas(4)          Proteobacteria
Roseobacter(4)         Proteobacteria

(1-6) Genus previously documented associated with insects:
(1) (Minard et al. 2013), (2) (Hail et al. 2012), (3) (Shelomi
et al. 2012), (4) (Duron and Hurst 2013), (5) (Duguma et al.
2013), Reed and Hafner 2002)

* Order: Enterobacteriales

([double dagger]) Also hit in Silva database

Caption: Fig. 1. Relative abundance of dominant bacterial taxa in Scirtothrips dorsalis. Abundance based on 23,068 contigs classified to 189 genera (supplimental table). Genera were included if identified as the best match for >3 contigs.


DUGUMA, D., RUGMAN-JONES, P., KAUFMAN, M. G., HALL, M. W., NEUFELD, J. D., STOUTHAMER, R., AND WALTON, W. E. 2013. Bacterial communities associated with Culex mosquito larvae and two emergent aquatic plants of bioremediation importance. PLoS ONE 8(8): e72522.

DURON, O., AND HURST, G. D. D. 2013. Arthropods and inherited bacteria: From counting the symbionts to understanding how symbionts count. BMC Biol. 11: 45.

HAIL, D., DOWD, S. E., AND BEXTINE, B. 2012. Identification and location of symbionts associated with potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) lifestages. Environ. Entomol. 41(1): 98-107.

MINARD, G., MAVINGUI, P., AND MORO, C. V. 2013. Diversity and function of bacterial microbiota in the mosquito holobiont. Parasites and Vectors 6: 146.

REED, D. L., AND HAFNER, M. S. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial communities associated with ectoparasitic chewing lice of pocket gophers: A culture-independent approach. Microb. Ecol. 44(1): 78-93.

SHELOMI, M., LO, W. S., KIMSEY, L. S., AND KUO, C. H. 2013. Analysis of the gut microbiota of walking sticks (Phasmatodea). BMC Res. Notes 6: 368.


We thank John Prokop and Florian Grant for technical support.


ALIAKBARPOUR, H., and MD. RAWI, C. S. 2012. Seasonal abundance of thrips hawaiiensis (Morgan) and Scirtothrips dorsalis (Hood) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in mango orchards in Malaysia. Petranika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 35(3): 637-645.

BROWNLIE, J. C., AND JOHNSON, K. N. 2009. Symbiont-mediated protection in insect hosts. Trends Micro biol. 17: 348-354.

BRUNNER, P. C., FLEMING, C., AND FREY, J. E. 2002. A molecular identification key for economically important thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae using direct sequencing and a pcr-rflp-based approach. Agric. For. Entomol. 4: 127-136.

CAMACHO, C., COLULOURIS, G., AVAGYAN, V., MA, N., PAPADOPOULOS, J., BEALER, K., AND MADDEN, T. 2009. Blast+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinforma 10: 421.

CHANBUSARAKUM, L., AND ULLMAN, D. 2008. Characterization of bacterial symbionts in Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), western flower thrips. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 99(3): 318-325.

CHANBUSARAKUM, L. J., AND ULLMAN, D. E. 2009. Distribution and ecology of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) bacterial symbionts. Environ. Entomol. 38(4): 1069-1077.

CHOI, K. S., YANG, J. Y., PARK, Y. M., KIM, S., CHOI, H., LYU, D., AND KIM, D. S. 2013. Pest lists and their damages on mango, dragon fruit and atemoya in Jeju, Korea. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 52(1): 45-51.

CHOUAIA, B., ROSSI, P., EPIS, S., MOSCA, M., RICCI, I., DAMIANI, C., ULISSI, U., CROTTI, E., DAFFONCHIO, D., BANDI, C., AND FAVIA, G. 2012. Delayed larval development in anopheles mosquitoes deprived of asaia bacterial symbionts. BMC Microbiol. 12(Suppl 1): S2.

CHU, F. H., CHAO, C. H., PENG, Y. C., LIN, S. S., CHEN, C. C., AND YEH, S. D. 2001. Serological and molecular characterization of peanut chlorotic fan-spot virus, a new species of the genus tospovirus. Phytopathology 91(9): 856-863.

DE VRIES, E. J., BREEUWER, J. A. J., JACOBS, G., AND MOLLEMA, C. 2001a. The association of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, with a near Erwinia species gut bacteria: Transient or permanent? J. Invertebr. Pathol. 77(2): 120-128.

DE VRIES, E. J., JACOBS, G., AND BREEUWER, J. A. J. 2001b. Growth and transmission of gut bacteria in the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. J, Invertebr. Pathol. 77(2): 129-137.

DE VRIES, E. J., JACOBS, G., SABELIS, M. W., MENKEN, S. B. J., AND BREEUWER, J. A. J. 2004. Diet-dependent effects of gut bacteria on their insect host: The symbiosis of Erwinia sp and western flower thrips. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 271(1553): 2171-2178.

DE VRIES, E. J., VAN DE WETERING, F., VAN DER HOEK, M. M., JACOBS, G., AND BREEUWER, J. A. J. 2012. Symbiotic bacteria (Erwinia sp.) in the gut of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) do not affect its ability to transmit tospovirus. European J. Entomol. 109(2): 261-266.

DE VRIES, E. J., VAN DER WURFF, A. W. G., JACOBS, G., AND BREEUWER, J. A. J. 2008. Onion thrips, thrips tabaci, have gut bacteria that are closely related to the symbionts of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. J. Insect Sci. 8(23): 1-11.

DE VRIES, E. J., VOS, R. A., JACOBS, G., AND BREEUWER, H. A. J. 2006. Western flower thrips (Thysanoptera:Thripidae) preference for thrips-damaged leaves over fresh leaves enables uptake of symbiotic gut bacteria. European J. Entomol. 103(4): 779-786.

DURON, O., BOUCHON, D., BOUTIN, S., BELLAMY, L., ZHOU, L., ENGELSTADTER, J., AND HURST, G. D. 2008. The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone. BMC Biol 6: 27.

DURON, O., AND HURST, G. D. D. 2013. Arthropods and inherited bacteria: From counting the symbionts to understanding how symbionts count. BMC Biol 11: 45.

GAO, J. Y., GUO, J., WANG, Z. R., ZHOU, D. G., PENG, M. X., AND YUE, J. Q. 2012. Study on insect pest species and occurrence rule of main species in Dehong lemon orchard of Yunnan province. Acta Agric. Jiangxi 24(6): 70-73.

GITAITIS, R. D., WALCOTT, R. R., WELLS, M. L., PEREZ, J. C. D., AND SANDERS, F. H. 2003. Transmission of pantoea ananatis, causal agent of center rot of onion, by tobacco thrips, Frankliniella fusca. Plant Dis. 87(6): 675-678.

GOPAL, K., REDDY, M. K., REDDY, D. V. R., AND MUNIYAPPA, V. 2010. Transmission of peanut yellow spot virus (PYSV) by thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood in groundnut. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 43: 421-429.

HEGDE, J. N., CHAKRAVARTHY, A. K., NAGAMANI, M. K., AND PRABHAKAR, M. S. 2011. Management of thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood, on rose under open-field and protected conditions. J. Hort. Sci. 62(2): 118-122.

HODGES, A., LUDWIG, S., OSBORNE, L., CIOMPERLIK, M., AND HODGES, G. 2007. National pest alert: Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood. USDA-CSREES.

HUSON, D. H., MITRA, S., WEBER, N., RUSCHEWEYH, H., AND SCHUSTER, S. C. 2011. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res. 21: 1552-1560.

HYUN, J. W., HWANG, R. Y., LEE, K. S., SONG, J. H., YI, P. H., KWON, H. M., HYUN, D. H., AND KIM, K. S. 2012. Seasonal occurrence of yellow tea thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in citrus orchards and its damage on citrus fruits. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 51(1): 1-7.

JONES, R. T., SANCHEZ, L. G., AND FIERER, N. 2013. A cross-taxon analysis of insect-associated bacterial diversity. PLoS ONE 8(4): e61218.

KUMAR, V., KAKKAR, G., MCKENZIE, C. L., SEAL, D. R., AND OSBORNE, L. S. 2013. An overview of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) biology, distribution and management in S. Soloneski and M. Larramendy [eds.],Weed and pest control--conventional and new challenges. InTech, DOI: 10.5772/55045. Available from: http://www. dorsalis-thysanoptera-thripidaebiology-distribution-and-m

MANNION, C. M., DERKSEN, A. I., SEAL, D. R., OSBORNE, L. S., AND MARTIN, C. G. 2013. Effects of rose cultivars and fertilization rates on populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in southern Florida. Florida Entomol. 96(2): 403-411.

MAO, D. P., ZHOU, Q., CHEN, C. Y., AND QUAN, Z. X. 2012. Coverage evaluation of universal bacterial primers using the metagenomic datasets. BMC Mi crobiol. 12(66).

MEDINA, R. F., NACHAPPA, P., AND TAMBORINDEGUY, C. 2011. Differences in bacterial diversity of host-associated populations of phylloxera notabilis Pergande (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) in pecan and water hickory. J. Evol. Biol. 24(4): 761-771.

MEENA, R. L., RAMASUBRAMANIAN, T., VENKATESAN, S., AND MOHANKUMAR, S. 2005. Molecular characterization of tospovirus transmitting thrips populations from India. American J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1(3): 167-172.

MINARD, G., MAVINGUI, P., AND MORO, C. V. 2013. Diversity and function of bacterial microbiota in the mosquito holobiont. Parasites and Vectors 6: 146.

MORSE, J. G., AND HODDLE, M. S. 2006. Invasion biology of thrips. Annu Rev Entomol 51: 67-89.

QUAST, C., PRUESSE, E., YILMAZ, P., GERKEN, J., SCHWEER, T., YARZA, P., PEPLIES, J., AND GLOCKNER, F. O. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal rna gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(D1): D590-D596.

RILEY, D. G., JOSEPH, S. V., SRINIVASAN, R., AND DIFFLE, S. 2011. Thrips vectors of tospoviruses. J. Integ. Pest Mgt. 1(2).

SAHA, D., AND MUKHOPADHYAY, A. 2013. Insecticide resistance mechanisms in three sucking insect pests of tea with reference to north-east India: An appraisal. Intl. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 33(1): 46-70.

SHELOMI, M., LO, W. S., KIMSEY, L. S., AND KUO, C. H. 2013. Analysis of the gut microbiota of walking sticks (Phasmatodea). BMC Res. Notes 6: 368.

TSUCHIDA, T., KOGA, R., HORIKAWA, M., TSUNODA, T., MAOKA, T., MATSUMOTO, S., SIMON, J. C., AND FUKATSU, T. 2010. Symbiotic bacterium modifies aphid body color. Science 330: 1102-1104.

WEISS, B., AND AKSOY, S. 2009. Microbiome influences in insect host vector competence. Trends Parasitol. 27(11): 514-522.

WELLS, M. L., GITAITIS, R. D., AND SANDERS, F. H. 2002. Association of tobacco thrips, Frankliniella fusca (Thysanoptera : Thripidae) with 2 species of bacteria of the genus pantoea. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 95(6): 719-723.

YAMOAH, E., JONES, E. E., WELD, R. J., SUCKLING, D. M., WAIPARA, N., BOURDOT, G. W., HEE, A. K. W., AND STEWART, A. 2008. Microbial population and diversity on the exoskeletons of four insect species associated with gorse (Ulex europaeus L.). Australian J. Entomol. 47: 370-379.


(1) Mid-Florida Research & Education Center, University of Florida, 2725 Binion Rd., Apopka, FL 32703, USA

(2) Biology Department, University of Nebraska Omaha, 6001 Dodge St., Omaha, NE 68182, USA

(3) Indian River Research & Education Center, University of Florida, 2199 South Rock Rd, Fort Pierce, FL 34945

(4) USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, 2001 South Rock Rd., Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA

* Corresponding author; E-mail:

Summarized from a presentation and discussions at the "Thrips: small players with big damage", Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the Florida Entomological Society, 16 July 2013, Naples, Florida.

Supplementary material for this article in Florida Entomologist 97(2) (2014) is online at


Genus(# Matches)                                       Phylum

propionibacterium (5072) (1)                     Actinobacteria
Stenotrophomonas (3143) (1) ([double dagger])    Proteobacteria
Pseudomonas (2717) (1) ([double dagger])         Proteobacteria
Methylobacterium (827) (1) ([double dagger])     Proteobacteria
Ralstonia (614) (1)                              Proteobacteria
Streptococcus (455) (1) ([double dagger])        Firmicutes
deinococcus (398) (1) ([double dagger])          Deinococcus-Thermus
Bradyrhizobium(350) (1) ([double dagger])        Proteobacteria
Enterobacter (338) (1) * ([double dagger])       Proteobacteria
achromobacter (289) (1) ([double dagger])        Proteobacteria
Mycobacterium (286) (2)                          Actinobacteria
Nocardioides (275) (2)                           Actinobacteria
Rothia (270)                                     Actinobacteria
Sphingomonas (270) (1) ([double dagger])         Proteobacteria
Sphingobium (268) (3)                            Proteobacteria

(1-3) Genus previously documented associated with insects:

(1) (Minard et al. 2013)

(2) (Hail et al. 2012)

(3) (Shelomi et al. 2013)

* Order: Enterobacteriales

([double dagger]) Also hit in Silva database


Please note: Some tables or figures were omitted from this article.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Dickey, Aaron M.; Trease, Andrew J.; Jara-Cavieres, Antonella; Kumar, Vivek; Christenson, Matthew K.
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2014
Previous Article:Current status of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Vidalia onions in Georgia.
Next Article:Effect of pollens of various ornamental pepper cultivars on the development and reproduction of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters