Printer Friendly

Estate of Allen v. City of Rockford.

U.S. Appeals Court


Estate of Allen v. City of Rockford, 349 F.3d 1015 (7th Cir. 2003). A pretrial detainee sued a city and several police officers under [section] 1983, alleging due process violations stemming from unwanted medical treatment received at a hospital following her arrest for driving under the influence of drugs. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The appeals court affirmed. The appeals court held that the officers owed the detainee a duty of care and safety during the time that the detainee was at the hospital, and that the officers' failure to intervene with the forcible medical treatment of the detainee did not violate her due process rights. The officers had taken the detainee to a hospital for the purpose of obtaining a urine sample. An emergency room physician stated that the detainee was not competent to make medical decisions regarding her health and might suffer a potentially life-threatening drug overdose if a drug screen was not conducted. The officers did not prevent the forcible extraction of blood and urine samples. (City of Rockford, Illinois)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of due process of law
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IL
Date:Feb 1, 2004
Previous Article:Dodge v. County of Orange.
Next Article:Evans v. City of Zebulon, GA.

Related Articles
Services- prisoner.
Daniels v. Woodside.
Daniels v. Woodside.
Jones v. Ray.
Estate of Allen v. City of Rockford.
Webster v. City of New York.
Webster v. City of New York.
Habeas corpus.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters