Printer Friendly

Essential oils in the control of dry bubble disease in white button mushroom/Oleos essenciais no controle da doenca bolha seca em champignon.

INTRODUCTION

Dry bubble disease, among the infections affect most severely white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) production, and is caused by a fungus, Lecanicillium fungicola (Preuss) Zare & W. Gams (ZARE & GAMS, 2008), inflicting an estimated 2-4% loss per year (BERENDSEN et al., 2012). Control measures that appear effective against dry bubble disease include implementing sanitary practices and spraying fungicides (GEA et al., 2005). However, to control the pests and diseases in mushrooms, while stringent specifications have been laid down regarding the use of chemical products, reports on tolerance to fungicides have triggered the urgency to develop disease resistant strains via genetic enhancement, as an environmentally sustainable and successful strategy (LARGETEAU & SAVOIE, 2010).

Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture has no registered disease control products for the commercial cultivation of A. bisporus (MAPA--IN 18, 2009); however, the producers apply fungicides daily, following the recommendations made in other countries, particularly the United States. Some modern facilities permitting prophylactic measures are considered onerous; therefore, their implementation is limited only to those mushroom producers possessing high investment capacities (ZIED et al., 2015).

In light of this, essential oils appear to potentially hold out promise as a feasible alternative to fungicides that can control both pests and diseases, and can safely be used to cultivate organic products (MAPA-IN 18, 2009; SEIXAS et al., 2011). Besides, essential oils are easily obtainable and inexpensive, as well as highly advantageous as they involve minimal issues of toxicity to humans and the environment as against synthetic products (PERINI et al., 2013).

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the essential oils of Cinnamomum zeylanicum (cinnamon), Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus), Melissa officinalis (lemon balm), Origanum vulgare (oregano), Syzygium aromaticum (clove) and Thymus vulgaris (thyme) on the development of in vitro and in vivo L. fungicola isolates and evaluate the ultrastructural pathogen-host interaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The L. fungicola isolates, termed LF.1 and LF.2, were drawn from the culture collection of the Laboratory of Edible Mushrooms, Biology Department of the UFLA. They were maintained in the PDA (potato-dextrose-agar) medium at 25[degrees]C. The essential oils extractions were done using dry vegetable materials through hydrodistillation employing a modified Clevenger apparatus adapted to a round bottom flask (4 liters) for 2 hours (FARMACOPEIA BRASILEIRA, 2010).

Evaluation of the fungicidal activity of the essential oils on the mycelial development of the LF.1 and LF.2 strains was done with 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.8% and 1.6% v/v concentrations (TANOVIC, et al., 2009). Each essential oil was pre-diluted in a sterile commercial milk powder solution (10g.[L.sup.-1]). The 1ml of each concentration was added to 9mL of PDA culture medium at 45[degrees]C mean temperature. At the center of each plate a 5-mm diameter disk was placed with mycelium of the monosporic culture grown prior for 7 days in PDA. The plates were then incubated at 25[degrees]C (AQUINO et al., 2014). Estimations were conducted through daily measurements of the colony diameters until day ten, after which, the Mycelial Growth Index (MGI) was determined, applying the equation adopted by ABREU et al. (2008).

Antifungal effect evaluation of the essential oils on the conidial germination of the LF.1 and LF.2 strains were done in the same concentrations of the six oils as in the prior assay. Thus, to the plates containing 9mL of 2% agar-water medium a mixture of 1mL of sterile commercial milk powder solution (10g.[L.sup.-1]) with essential oil was added. The spore assay was obtained earlier by the addition of 10mL of sterile water to the monosporic culture of each strain. The mycelium was scraped with the Drigalski loop, after which it was filtered and quantified in the Neubauer chamber. Spore suspension was then adjusted to a concentration of [10.sup.6][ml.sup.-1] conidia, and 100[micron]L of the L. fungicola spore suspension was used to inoculate each plate. Plates were then incubated at 25[degrees]C. Next, under a light microscope 50 spores per area (2[cm.sup.2]) were counted, as well as the percentage of conidia which germinated after 20 hours of incubation. The assay involved three replicates per treatment, for a total of 150 spores. Positive antifungal activity was achieved when there was no evidence of growth; spores showing germ tube emission were regarded as having germinated, indicating negative antifungal activity (ITAKO et al., 2008).

Besides the treatments involving the six essential oils, an inhibition standard constituted by the Sportak fungicide (160[micron]L.[mL.sup.-1] for LF.1 and 320[micron]L.[mL.sup.-1] for LF.2) was used, a control made up of the culture medium and 1mL of powdered milk solution (10g.[L.sup.-1]) and an absolute control.

When tested in vivo, the lowest oil concentrations that successfully achieved total inhibition in the in vitro pathogen tests were used. "Sitio dos Micelios", a company in Barbacena-MG provided the commercial compound for the mushroom production. For treatment with the essential oil, 2kg blocks were assembled with 5 replicates, besides the controls made up of the Sportak fungicide and absolute control. A covering layer of dystroferric red latosol and calcitic limestone 2:1 (v/v) was added after the substrate was completely colonized by A. bisporus. The soil surface was ruffled seven days after the cover layer was added. After total colonization, temperature adjustments to 18 [+ or -] 1[degrees]C were made and the relative humidity was maintained at 80%, throughout the mushroom growth cycle. After two days, a spore suspension ([10.sup.6][mL.sup.-1] conidia) from each strain of L. fungicola was sprayed (5mL per block) onto the surface of the compound cover layer, as a post-infestation treatment measure. The treatment was completed by adding 5ml of a spray solution of the essential oils by block (TANOVIC et al., 2009). Pre-infestation treatment involved application of the essential oils on day one and the spore suspension on day two (REGNIER & COMBRINCK, 2010). Mushrooms were then harvested and weighed. They were distinguished as healthy or diseased for further calculation of the incidence of the disease and productivity of the mushroom.

The pathogen-inoculated basidiocarps were hand-chopped into pieces (2[cm.sup.2]) using a scalpel and studied under a scanning electron microscope. Sample collection was done at 13, 16, 19 and 23 hours post inoculation. Fixing of these samples was then done in a modified Karnovsky's solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.05M sodium cacodylate buffer, 0.001M CaCl2, pH 7.2) and treated according to the method of ALVES et al. (2008). Images produced were recorded and studied using the Photopaint software of the Corel Draw X6 package.

For both the in vitro tests, a completely randomized experimental design was adopted, in a factorial scheme (oils x concentrations x strains) involving three replicates. Data were submitted to the analysis of variance and the Scott-Knott test was used to compare the means (P<0.05). For the in vivo test a randomized complete block design was selected for the experiment, in a factorial scheme (oils x strains x mode of application) which included five replicates. Data were submitted to the analysis of variance and the Tukey test was used to compare the means (P<0.05). The R Core Development Team software was employed for the data analysis (VENABLES & SMITH, 2007).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

On analysis of all the treatments, the essential oils of lemon balm, eucalyptus and oregano induced a decrease in the variables analyzed, based on the concentration used; unfortunately, these oils were inadequate to control the L. fungicola (Table 1 and 2). In this context, BARRERA-NECHA et al (2008) verified that eucalyptus oil could not inhibit the mycelial growth of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in various concentrations. However, SOYLU et al (2006) reported contrasting results, as they confirmed the antifungal activity of the oregano essential oil, evident from the complete inhibition of the Phytophthora infestans mycelial growth. Similarly, TAGAMI et al (2009) revealed that the raw extract of lemon balm exhibited a fungitoxic effect on the mycelial growth of fungus Alternaria alternata and C. graminicola.

The strains of L. fungicola revealed different responses to treatments. Most frequently, the LF.1 strain showed a higher degree of success in inhibiting mycelial growth, in terms of the LF.2 strain. However, for the spore germination variable, the inhibitory effect exerted by the treatments differed between the two strains in such a manner that, for a specific oil concentration, one strain experienced a higher degree of mycelial growth inhibition, while the other experienced a higher degree of spore germination inhibition. For instance, for lemon balm 1.6%, the LF.1 strain showed a lower MGI, while in the LF.2 strain the percentage of conidia germination was lower. From these results it is evident that the different effects are possible for the two variables within the same strain. This implies an interesting possibility of combining the oils to guarantee disease control in a situation in which different lineages of the pathogen may possibly be present.

In the same context, it must be noted that for treatments which did not show a completely inhibition of the variables analyzed, a huge variation in the inhibition rate was evident in the L. fungicola spores, ranging between 54 and 90% inhibition (Table 2). From these treatments could be pointed out 1.6% lemon balm, 1.6% eucalyptus and 0.4% thyme which provided percentage of conidia germination from 10 to 18%, considering the two strains. Therefore, although strong inhibition of the mycelial growth is not visible, a few of these treatments could exert a high spore germination inhibition rate in L. fungicola, which could effectively control the disease.

Besides the positive control (Sportak fungicide), cinnamon and clove oils at 0.4%, 0.8% and 1.6% concentrations and thyme oil at 0.8% and 1.6% exhibited 100% inhibition of mycelial growth and conidial germination for the two strains (Table 1 and 2). TEIXEIRA et al, (2013) reported similar results, which confirmed that the thyme, clove and cinnamon oils in concentrations above 0.025% could totally inhibit the mycelial growth and spore germination in the fungus Stenocarpella maydis. Therefore, these oils offered a greater potential of use in L. fungicola control, as a viable alternative, superior to utilizing chemical fungicides in A. bisporus cultivation.

Thus, for the in vivo test, clove and cinnamon oils (0.4%) and thyme (0.8%) were chosen and applied prior to (pre-infestation) or after (post-infestation) inoculation of the pathogen; the findings are listed in table 3. In the case of the LF.1 strain, when post-infestation application of the oils was done, all the treatments exhibited lower incidence of the disease. However, for the LF.2 strain, only the thyme oil exhibited this effect, because for cinnamon and clove, the time of the oil application seemed to have no significant effect on the incidence of the disease. These results imply that the effectiveness of any treatment is dependent on the genetic variability of the pathogenic strains. Therefore, the findings of this study showed greater evidence that using a combination of essential oils is a safer way to explore treatment effectiveness.

Using the scanning electron microscope, an increase in the number of L. fungicola spores and the higher prevalence of germination was evident over time, implying the presence of the infection within approximately 19 hours (Figure 1). This finding concurs with the results of ZIED et al. (2015), who reported conidial germination after 15 hours of inoculation. Most likely, occurrence of the disease is higher when the oils are applied pre-infestation, which occurs because of the volatility of the oils employed. As a large percentage of the spores do not germinate within the first hours, it is possible that this dormancy period is long enough for the oil to be at a concentration lower than required to be effective. In light of this, in practice, it is not possible to control the time when the spores will be present; therefore, the findings of this study emphasized the importance of applying the essential oil, or a combination of essential oils, sequentially, through the whole course of the production cycle.

Thus, essential oils are a promising option for the cultivation of pesticide-free mushrooms, avoiding inflicting harm to either man or environment. However, the two aspects of cost-effectiveness and application efficiency must be taken into account, which justify the necessity for greater research into the practical utilization of essential oils in mushroom cultivation.

CONCLUSION

Cinnamon, thyme and clove oils were reported to be most effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth and germination of the L. fungicola spores, and hence identified as the most suitable for use in the studies on disease control in the A. bisporus cultivation.

Generally, the post-infestation applications of the essential oils were demonstrated to more effectively control the disease, rather than their application during the pre-infestation stage.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr2016078Q

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author expresses gratitude for the financial support extended by the Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq). Thanks also to the company Sitio dos Micelios for the champignon compounds provided at concession.

REFERENCES

ABREU, G.F. et al. Bioprospecting of marine seaweeds and aquatic plants for controlling the bean anthracnose. Summa Phytopathologica, Botucatu, v.34, n.1, p.22-26, Jan./Feb. 2008. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S0100-54052008000100017&lng=en&nrm=iso>. Accessed: Jun. 28, 2014. doi: 10.1590/S0100-54052008000100017.

AQUINO, C.F. et al. Chemical composition and in vitro activity of three essential oils on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides from passion fruit. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, Campinas, v.16, n.2, p.329-336, Jan. 2014. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-05722014000500004&lng=pt&nrm=iso>. Accessed: Nov. 15, 2014. doi: 10.1590/1983-084X/12_115.

BARRERA-NECHA, L.L. et al. Efficacy of essential oils on the conidial germination, growth of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. and Sacc and control of postharvest diseases in papaya (Carica papaya L.). Plant Pathology Journal, Oxford, v.7, n.2, p.174-178, Mar. 2008. Available from: <http://scialert.net/ fulltext/?doi=ppj .2008.174.178>. Accessed: Nov. 26, 2014. doi: 10.3923/ppj.2008.174.178.

BERENDSEN, R.L. et al. Effects of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. isolated from mushroom cultures on Lecanicillium fungicola. Biological Control, Orlando, v.63, n.2, p.210-221, Nov. 2012. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1049964412001636>. Accessed: Dec. 09, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j. biocontrol.2012.07.012.

FARMACOPEIA BRASILEIRA. 4.ed. Sao Paulo: Ateneu, 2010. Parte I, p.2-7.

GEA, FJ. et al. Reduced sensitivity of the mushroom pathogen Verticillium fungicola to prochloraz-manganese in vitro. Mycological Research, Cambridge, v.109, n.6, p.741-745, June 2005. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0953756208614768>. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2015. doi: 10.1017/S095375620500242X.

ITAKO, A.T. et al. Antifungal activity and protection of tomato plants by extracts of medicinal plants. Tropical Plant Pathology, Brasilia, v.33, n.3, p.241-244, May/June 2008. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1982-56762008000300011&lng=pt&nrm=iso>. Accessed: Feb. 10, 2015. doi: 10.1590/S1982-56762008000300011.

LARGETEAU, M.; SAVOIE, J.M. Microbially induced diseases of Agaricus bisporus: biochemical mechanisms and impact on commercial mushroom production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v.86, n.1, p.63-73, Mar. 2010. Available from: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-010-2445-2>. Accessed: Jun. 16, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2445-2.

MAPA (INSTRUCAO NORMATIVA CONJUNTA No. 18, DE 28 DE MAIO DE 2009). Available from: <http://www.agricultura. gov.br/arq_editor/file/Desenvolvimento_Sustentavel/Organicos/ Legislacao/Nacional/Instrucao_Normativa_n_0_018_de_28-052009.pdf>. Accessed: Aug. 08, 2016.

PERINI, V.B.M. et al. Effect of vegetal extract in the inhibition of mycelial growth of Pyricularia grisea. Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, Tocantins, v.4, n.1, p.70-77, Feb. 2013. Available from: <http://revista.uft.edu.br/index.php/ JBB/article/view/433>. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2015. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-474X(00)00016-3.

REGNIER, T.; COMBRINCK, S. In vitro and in vivo screening of essential oils for the control of wet bubble disease of Agaricus bisporus. South African Journal of Botany, Pretoria, v.76, n.4, p.681-685, Oct. 2010. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0254629910001961>. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.018.

SEIXAS, P.T.L. et al. Fungitoxic activity of essential oil of citronella grass (Cymbopogon nardus L.) and compound citronellal. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, Botucatu, v.13, n. esp, p.523-526, 2011. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-05722011000500003&lng =pt&nrm=iso>. Accessed: Aug. 02, 2015. doi: 10.1590/S1516-05722011000500003.

SOYLU, E.M. et al. Antimicrobial activities of the essential oils of various plants against tomato late blight disease agent Phytophthora infestans. Mycopathologia, Den Hague, v.161, n.2, p.119-128, Feb. 2006. Available from: <http://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s11046-005-0206-z>. Accessed: Jul. 28, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s11046-005-0206-z.

TAGAMI, O.K. et al. Fungitoxicty of Bidens pilosa, Thymus vulgaris, Lippia alba and Rosmarinus officinalis in the in vitro development of phytophatogens fungi. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias, Londrina, v.30, n.2, p.285-294, April/June 2009. Available from: <http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/ semagrarias/article/viewArticle/2578>. Accessed: Jul. 14, 2016. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2009v30n2p285.

TANOVIC, B. et al. In vitro effect of essential oils from aromatic and medicinal plants on mushroom pathogens: Verticillium fungicola var .fungicola, Mycogone perniciosa, and Cladobotryum sp. Archives of Biological Sciences, Belgrade, v.61, n.2, p.231-237, Apr. 2009. Available from: <http://serbiosoc.org.rs/arch/>. Accessed: Sept. 18, 2013. doi: 10.2298/ABS0902231T.

TEIXEIRA, G.A. et al. Essential oils on the control of stem and ear rot in maize. Ciencia Rural, Santa Maria, v.43, n.11, p.1945-1951, Nov. 2013. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782013001100004&lng =pt&nrm=iso>. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2014. doi: 10.1590/S010384782013-001100004.

VENABLES, W.N.; SMITH, DM. Development core team. An introduction to R. Notes on R: a programming environment for data analysis and graphics, 2007. Available from: <http://www. math.vu.nl/sto/onderwijs/statlearn/R-Binder.pdf>. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2015.

ZARE, R.; GAMS, W. A revision of the Verticillium fungicola species complex and its affinity with the genus Lecanicillium. Mycological Research, Cambridge, v.112, n.7, p.811-824, July 2008. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0953756208000464>. Accessed: May 24, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.01.019.

ZIED, D.C. et al. Tolerance to Lecanicillium fungicola and yield of Agaricus bisporus strains used in Brazil. Scientia Horticulturae, v.190, p.117-122, July 2015. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S030442381500223X>. Accessed: Oct. 12, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.021.

Tamara Leite dos Santos (1) * Leonidas Leoni Belan (2) Diego Cunha Zied (3) Eustaquio Souza Dias (1) Eduardo Alves (2)

(1) Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG, Brasil. E-mail: tamaraleite@yahoo.com.br

* Corresponding author.

(2) Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG, Brasil.

(3) Departamento de Ciencias do Solo e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Dracena, SP, Brasil.

Received 08.20.16 Approved 01.18.17 Returned by the author 03.06.17

Caption: Figure 1--Scanning electron micrographs of A. bisporus inoculated with L. fungicola. Sample collect times after inoculation. (A) 13 hours, (B) 16 hours, (C) 19 hours and (D) 23 hours.

===============re-work TABLE 1&2 E20160780
Table 1--Treatments means of Mycelial Growth Index
(MGI) of Lecanicillium fungicola.

Treatments      Means MGI    Treatments     Means MGI    Treatments
                  (mm)                        (mm)

FUN (1)            0 a      EUC (1.6%/1)     2.86 b     THY (0.4%/2)
FUN (2)            0 a      CLO (0.2%/1)     3.93 c     EUC (0.2%/1)
CIN (0.4%/1)       0 a      EUC (0.8%/1)     4.33 e     ORE (0.8%/2)
CIN (0.4%/2)       0 a      EUC (1.6%/2)     4.43 c     LEM (0.4%/1)
CIN (0.8%/l)       0 a      LEM (1.6%/1)     4.90 e     ORE (0.2%/1)
CIN (0.8%/2)       0 a      THY (0.2%/1)     5.76 d     LEM (0.2%/1)
CIN (1.6%/1)       0 a      THY (0.4%/1)     5.83 d     ORE (0.4%/1)
CIN (1.6%/2)       0 a      CIN (0.2%/2)     5.90 d        CON (1)
CLO (0.4%/l)       0 a      CLO (0.2%/2)     6.06 d     ORE (0.4%/2)
CLO (0.4%/2)       0 a      EUC (0.4%/1)     6.36 d     EUC (0.4%/2)
CLO (0.8%/1)       0 a      ORE (0.8%/1)     6.46 d        CON (2)
CLO (0.8%/2)       0 a      CIN (0.2%/1)     6.66 d     LEM (0.2%/2)
CLO (1.6%/1)       0 a      LEM (0.8%/1)     6.70 d     LEM (0.4%/2)
CLO (1.6%/2)       0 a      ORE (1.6%/1)     6.70 d     LEM (0.8%/2)
THY (0.8%/l)       0 a      THY (0.2%/2)     6.73 d     EUC (0.2%/2)
THY (0.8%/2)       0 a      ORE (1.6%/2)     6.83 d     ORE (0.2%/2)
THY (1.6%/1)       0 a      EUC (0.8%/2)     6.93 d       MILK (2)
THY (1.6%/2)       0 a      LEM (1.6%/2)     7.30 e       MILK (1)

Treatments       Means MGI
                    (mm)

FUN (1)            7.30 e
FUN (2)            7.33 e
CIN (0.4%/1)       7.43 e
CIN (0.4%/2)       7.56 e
CIN (0.8%/l)       7.66 e
CIN (0.8%/2)       7.70 e
CIN (1.6%/1)       7.90 e
CIN (1.6%/2)       8.23 f
CLO (0.4%/l)       8.60 f
CLO (0.4%/2)       8.60 f
CLO (0.8%/1)       8.63 f
CLO (0.8%/2)       8.76 f
CLO (1.6%/1)       8.76 f
CLO (1.6%/2)       8.83 f
THY (0.8%/l)       8.83 f
THY (0.8%/2)       8.90 f
THY (1.6%/1)       9.30 f
THY (1.6%/2)       9.43 f

THY--essential oil of thyme; CLO--essential oil of clove;
CIN--essential oil of cinnamon; FUN--Sportak fungicide;
EUC--essential oil of eucalyptus; LEM--essential oil of lemon balm;
ORE--essential oil of oregano; CON--absolute control;
MILK--control of milk solution; 1--strain LF.1; 2--strain LF.2.

* Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly by
Scott-Knott test (P<0.05). 9V

Table 2--Treatments means (%) of conidial germination of
Lecanicillium fungicola.

Treatments      Means (%)    Treatments     Means (%)    Treatments

FUN (1)            0 a      THY (1.6%/1)       0 a      EUC (0.8%/1)
FUN (2)            0 a      THY (1.6%/2)       0 a      CLO (0.2%/2)
ON (0.2%/1)        0 a      LEM (1.6%/2)      10 b      ORE (0.8%/1)
CIN (0.2%/2)       0 a      EUC (1.6%/2)       12b      ORE (0.8%/2)
CIN (0.4%/1)       0 a      THY (0.4%/1)      12 b      THY (0.2%/2)
CIN (0.4%/2)       0 a      LEM (1.6%/1)      14 c      EUC (0.4%/1)
CIN (0.8%/1)       0 a      LEM (0.4%/1)       16c      EUC (0.4%/2)
CIN (0.8%/2)       0 a      CLO (0.2%/1)       16c      ORE (0.2%/1)
CIN (1.6%/1)       0 a      THY (0.4%/2)       16c      EUC (0.2%/2)
CIN (1.6%/2)       0 a      EUC (1.6%/1)      18 d      EUC (0.2%/1)
CLO (0.4%/1)       0 a      LEM (0.2%/2)      20 d      LEM (0.2%/1)
CLO (0.4%/2)       0 a      LEM (0.4%/2)      20 d      ORE (0.4%/1)
CLO (0.8%/1)       0 a      LEM (0.8%/1)      20 d      ORE (0.2%/2)
CLO (0.8%/2)       0 a      ORE (1.6%/1)      24 e      ORE (0.4%/2)
CLO (1.6%/1)       0 a      THY (0.2%/1)      24 e         CON (1)
CLO (1.6%/2)       0 a      EUC (0.8%/2)      26 f         CON (2)
THY (0.8%/1)       0 a      ORE (1.6%/2)      26 f        MIL K (1)
THY (0.8%/2)       0 a      LEM (0.8%/2)      30 g        MILK (2)

Treatments      Means (%)

FUN (1)            30 g
FUN (2)            30 g
ON (0.2%/1)        30 g
CIN (0.2%/2)       32 h
CIN (0.4%/1)       32 h
CIN (0.4%/2)       34 h
CIN (0.8%/1)       34 h
CIN (0.8%/2)       34 h
CIN (1.6%/1)       36 h
CIN (1.6%/2)       40 l
CLO (0.4%/1)       40 l
CLO (0.4%/2)       44 j
CLO (0.8%/1)       46 j
CLO (0.8%/2)       46 j
CLO (1.6%/1)      100 k
CLO (1.6%/2)      100 k
THY (0.8%/1)      100 k
THY (0.8%/2)      100 k

THY--essential oil of thyme; CLO--essential oil of clove;
CIN--essential oil of cinnamon; FUN--Sportak fungicide;
EUC--essential oil of eucalyptus; LEM--essential oil of lemon balm;
ORE--essential oil of oregano; CON--absolute control;
MILK--control of milk solution; 1--strain LF.1; 2--strain LF.2.

* Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly by
Scott-Knott test (P<0.05).

Table 3--Dry bubble disease incidence means (%) according to
strains and period of essential oils application.

                LF.1

                Cinnamon   Thyme      Clove
Post-           18.66 Ab   19.56 Ab   33.4 Ab
  Infestation
Pre-            91.34 Aa   62.94 Ba   54.92 Ba
  Infestation

                LF.2

                Cinnamon   Thyme      Clove
Post-           23.36 Aa   5.94 Ab    17.70 Aa
  Infestation
Pre-            31.64 Ba   52.07 Aa   19.99 Ba
  Infestation

* Means followed by the same capital letter in the row and lower
case in the column, do not differ by Tukey test (P<0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2017 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CROP PROTECTION
Author:Santos, Tamara Leite dos; Belan, Leonidas Leoni; Zied, Diego Cunha; Dias, Eustaquio Souza; Alves, Ed
Publication:Ciencia Rural
Article Type:Ensayo
Date:May 1, 2017
Words:4336
Previous Article:Time domain heart rate variability in Boxer dogs with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/ Variabilidade da frequencia cardiaca no...
Next Article:Multisystemic eosinophilic epitheliotropic disease in a horse in Brazil/Doenca multissistemica eosinofilica epiteliotropica em um equino no Brasil.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |