Printer Friendly

Equilibrio acido-base: el mejor enfoque clinico.

Acid-base equilibrium: The best clinical approach


Over time, researchers like Henderson, Hasselbalch, Stewart, Siggaard and Andersen, among others have contributed to the basic understanding of acid-base equilibrium. However, discussions are still ongoing regarding which should be the approach in clinical practice: a simple, reproducible approach or a complex approach with multiple laboratory parameters? Considering that, in the end, the clinical approach to the patient has diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications, a fast accurate process is imperative (1-7).


A non-systematic review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and OvidSP databases. The following MESH terms were used for the advanced search: Acid-Base, Equilibrium OR Acid-Base imbalance OR Acidosis OR Alkalosis OR Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, included in the title, the abstract or the key words. The search was restricted to articles published after 2002.

The articles were then selected according to the title and the abstract and sorted by topics considered relevant by the authors for detailed review, including history, pathophysiology, consequences, divergences, clinical approach (according to various authors), diagnosis, prognosis and management.

Physiology in the Henderson and Hasselbalch traditional approach

Free hydrogen ions ([H.sup.+]) are found in arterial blood at a concentration between 35 and 45 nmol/L, which is the same as maintaining a pH between 7.45 and 7.35; pH is defined as the negative logarithm (base 10) of hydrogen ion concentration in blood (8-10). Hydrogen ion ([H.sup.+]) concentration is one of the most important parameters in acid-base equilibrium and depends on the interactions between partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaC[O.sub.2]), bicarbonate ion (HC[O.sub.3.sup.-]) plasma concentration, constant dissociation of carbonic acid, and carbon dioxide solubility, as determined by the Henderson and Hasselbalch equation. Carbon dioxide (C[O.sub.2]) reacts with water in a reversible way to form carbonic acid, which later dissociates into HC[O.sub.3.sup.-] + [H.sup.+] (C[O.sub.2] + [H.sub.2]O [left and right arrow] [H.sub.2]C[O.sub.3] [left and right arrow] [H.sup.+] + HC[O.sub.3.sup.-]). This reaction is catalysed by carbonic anhydrase, an enzyme found in red blood cells, nephrons, gut, pancreas, striated muscle, and lung capillary endothelia (7,8,10,11).

Compensatory mechanisms

In order to maintain the acid-base balance in extracellular fluid, changes are compensated by:

(1) The respiratory system, which clears or retains C[O.sub.2] through alveolar ventilation changes (hyperventilation or hypoventilation, respectively, in response to changes sensed by the chemoreceptors), leading to changes in PaC[O.sub.2]. Because of its low molecular weight and high solubility, C[O.sub.2] crosses easily between the different membranes and biological compartments, altering [[H.sup.+]] (4-6,9,12-16).

(2) The renal system, through the proximal tubule, which increases or lowers [H.sup.+] secretion (acid) and resorbs close to 80% of filtered HC[O.sub.3.sup.-] 16% into the large ascending segment and the distal convoluted tubule, and the remaining 4% into the collecting tubule. But new bicarbonate is also produced through two mechanisms: (1) From glutamine (2/1) by deamination in the proximal tubule, resulting in alpha-ketoglutarate which is metabolised with C[O.sub.2] and [H.sub.2]O to form HC[O.sub.3.sup.-], while ammonium (N[H.sub.4.sup.+]) dissociates into ammonia (N[H.sub.3]) for transport to the tubular lumen. (2) From phosphates in the form of neutral salts filtered by the glomerulus that bind to [H.sup.+] in the lumen, generating HC[O.sub.3.sup.-] in the cells of the proximal and distal tubules and the collecting duct in a 1:1 ratio, although they represent only a small fraction (titratable acidity). Bicarbonate then becomes the main non-respiratory metabolic control factor in acid-base equilibrium (4-6,9,12-16).

Importance of pH maintenance

Acute changes in blood pH induce regulatory effects on protein and enzyme structure and function, leading to changes in cell function such as glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, mitosis, and DNA synthesis, among others (12,13). Hence it is important to understand the concurrence of elements governing pH maintenance within physiologic boundaries, such as HC[O.sub.3.sup.-], [H.sup.+], phosphates, albumin, [Na.sup.+], [K.sup.+], [Cl.sup.-] lactate, urates, keto acids and others, enabling the preservation of complex and efficient cell functions related to acid-base balance (12-14,17).

The Stewart approach

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Canadian physiologist Peter Stewart proposed a different approach to acid-base equilibrium physiology and disturbances based on a mathematical model in which body fluids were considered as a physicochemical system, supported by three basic principles: (1) Maintenance of the electric charge; (2) maintenance of mass; (3) the law of mass action. The approach derived from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation does not consider all the factors influencing [[H.sup.+]] and, consequently, does not explain the complex metabolic abnormalities of acid-base balance (13,14,18,19). Therefore, in the Stewart approach, HCO3is presented as a dependent variable, implying that changes in [[H.sup.+]] and, consequently in pH, could only occur through the modification of three variables: (1) PaC[O.sub.2]; (2) total concentration of weak, non-volatile gases ([ATOt]); (3) differences among strong ions (SID) (1,2,7,13,14,18,19).

PaC[O.sub.2] is defined as the pressure exerted by C[O.sub.2] on arterial blood in the gas mix (independently of each gas), with the physiological implications already mentioned. [Atot] refers to albumin, inorganic phosphates and HC[O.sub.3.sup.-] (weak ions), which are partially dissociated in the blood buffer (1,2,7,13,14,18,19). SID is the difference between the sum of plasma concentrations of strong positive charges (cations) and strong negative charges (anions), the most important being sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chlorine and lactate, which are totally dissociated and do not participate in proton transfer reactions. In plasma there is normally cation excess, explaining why SID is a positive value usually ranging between 40 and 48 mEq/L (charges and ions present). An increased SID reflects a rise in pH (alkalosis) and a lower SID reflects a drop in pH (acidosis) (2,14,20).

In order to determine the metabolic component in acid-base equilibrium using the Stewart model, the strong ion gap (SIG) calculation must be taken into consideration and, for this, the strong ion difference apparent ([SID.sub.a]) and the strong ion difference effective ([SID.sub.e]) must be calculated first. [SID.sub.a] is determined by the formula [SID.sub.a] = ([[Na.sup.+]] + [[K.sup.+]] + [[Mg.sup.2O+]] + [[Ca.sup.2+]])--([[Cl.sup.-]] + [[Lactate.sup.-]]), where the contribution of weak acids is not considered, whereas [SID.sub.e] is determined by the formula [SID.sub.e] = [(2.46 x [10.sup.-8]) x (PC[O.sub.2]/10-pH)] + [[Albumin]g/L x 0.123 x (pH -0.631)] + [[Phosphates]mmol/L x 0.309 x (pH -0.469)], in which weak acids are also included. Therefore, to calculate SIG, the difference between [SID.sub.a] and [SID.sub.e] is determined (SIG=[SID.sub.a]--[SID.sub.e]) and indicates the presence of other non-measured weak anions such as keto acids, sulphates, urates, citrate, pyruvate, acetate and gluconate (2,3,13,15,21-26).

SIG equals zero when only plasma buffers (bicarbonate, albumin and phosphates) are added to [[Cl.sup.-]] and to [[lactate.sup.-]]. In other words, SIG = 0, when [SID.sub.a] = [HC[O.sub.3.sup.-]] + [[Albumin.sup.-]] + [HP[O.sub.3.sup.2-]] (2,3,13,21-25). The Siggaard-Andersen approach

In 1960 Siggaard and Andersen implemented a method using capillary blood to determine acid-base balance based on the Van Slyke equation. This method emphasizes the use of base excess (BE) or deficit, representing the number of additional acid or base milliequivalents needed to be added to a litre of blood in order to normalise pH at 37[degrees]C. In this calculation, PaC[O.sub.2] and pH (measured) are considered. This variable is divided into BE and standard BE (SBE), the difference being that the gas machine calculates the latter based on an estimated haemoglobin concentration of 5 g/dl in extracellular fluid (6,24,27-33).

There is a direct relationship between SBE and changes in SID and weak acid concentrations. This means that a base deficit (negative SBE) corresponds to a positive SID and reflects the presence of non-measured anions (e.g. lactate), while positive SBE corresponds to a negative SID. Consequently, it represents a reliable measurement of the metabolic component and constitutes a practical tool for clinical application (6,24,27-33).


Derksen et al (19). showed that the Henderson-Hasselbalch method may be considered a simplified version of Stewart's general model and that the two are not different despite the fact that the latter considers more variables, because, in the end, the clinical interpretation is the same. When Stewart's theoretical model is compared with the traditional rationale, we find that it offers a clearer understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanism, but is no different when it comes to the diagnosis of acid-base imbalances, or the initial therapeutic management (19,34-38).

There is no consensus so far regarding prognostic implications, because a higher SID has been associated with unfavourable results in some groups (19,39), and base and lactate deficits have been found to be independent mortality risk factors in trauma patients and patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery (39,40). On the other hand, Kurtz et al (2). concluded that both approaches are quantitatively interchangeable and do not offer diagnostic or prognostic advantages (2,20).

Clinical application: step-by-step diagnosis of acid-base imbalances

Acid-base disturbances may be primary, although they are more commonly secondary to diseases such as Diabetes Mellitus, renal failure, seizures, sepsis, gastroenteritis, pancreatic leaks, bowel obstruction, or the use of medications such as isoniazid, furosemide or linezolid. Likewise, other systems may be affected during the course of a disease with acid-base imbalances, including the immune system, and bone resorption and formation abnormalities. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms have not been clearly elucidated (5,41,42).

The approach to the diagnosis of acid-base imbalances requires establishing the relationship between the clinical history (vomiting, diarrhoea, oedema, dyspnoea, trauma, transfusions or medications), the physical examination (signs of dehydration or oedema, polypnea, tetany, coma) and blood gas parameters. This requires determining which is the predominant component (respiratory or metabolic), and analysing the consistency of the compensatory mechanism, always bearing in mind that there are physiological overcompensations that lead to mixed or combined acid-base disturbances (5,26,43-46).

A simple, expedite approach without complex and multiple variables that can estimate metabolic components is of the utmost importance to help with the interpretation and diagnosis of acid-base imbalances. Therefore, we recommend the use of the approach that implements SBE and to follow the algorithm proposed in Fig. 1, with the following analytical sequence:

1. Patient: knowledge and analysis of the patient's clinical context.

2. Primary disorder: determine whether blood pH indicates acidosis (<7.35), alkalosis (>7.45) or if it is within the reference rage (7.35-7.45), where the possibilities are total compensation, or absence of acid-base disturbances.

3. Origin of primary disorder: in accordance with the clinical context, determine whether to analyse the respiratory (PaC[O.sub.2]) or the metabolic (SBE) component in order to determine the origin or the predominance of the acid-base imbalance:

* PaC[O.sub.2] lower than 35 mmHg indicates respiratory alkalosis, and PaC[O.sub.2] greater than 45 mmHg indicates respiratory acidosis (reference range between 35 and 45 mmHg).

* SBE less than -3mmol/L indicates metabolic acidosis, and SBE greater than a +3mmol/L indicates metabolic alkalosis (reference range between -3 and +3mmol/L).

4. Consistency of the compensatory mechanism or mixed disorder (combined): once the origin of the primary disorder is determined (respiratory or metabolic), a determination is made of whether the other component tries to compensate, or totally compensates, the pH (e.g. respiratory acidosis with metabolic alkalosis); or if, on the contrary, it helps perpetuate the disorder (e.g. metabolic acidosis with respiratory acidosis) (5,6,26,29,32,43-45,47-50). (Fig. 1).


Illustrative cases

The following cases will be analysed applying the diagnostic algorithm for acid-base disturbances proposed in Fig. 1:

Case 1: A 35-year-old male patient with a history of alcohol abuse was found unconscious in his apartment by a neighbour. He is taken to the emergency service where he arrives with a blood pressure of 100/60 mmHg, heart rate of 124x min, no fever, mild response to painful stimuli. Blood gases are taken on admission, with the following results: pH 6.92, PaC[O.sub.2] 80 mmHg and SBE -14.2mmol/L.

According to the proposed algorithm, the first thing to do is to use pH to determine whether there is acidosis, alkalosis or normal balance. In this case, pH is 7.35, corresponding to acidosis. Next is the metabolic component, and BE is less than -3mmol/L, indicating metabolic acidosis. Finally, PaC[O.sub.2] is greater than 45 mmHg, leading unexpectedly to the initial diagnosis of respiratory acidosis, meaning that there is no respiratory compensation. The conclusion from the analysis is a diagnosis of mixed acidosis (51).

Case 2: A 72-year-old female patient is admitted to the emergency service with symptoms of fever, lower abdominal pain, dyspnoea, and anuria lasting for 2 days. She has a history of diabetes mellitus type II, treated with metformin. Findings on physical examination include dehydration, tachypnea, heart rate 120 x min, blood pressure 110/80 mmHg, and no other abnormal findings. The results of blood gases taken on admission are pH 6.82, PaC[O.sub.2] 20.2 mmHg, SBE--30.2mmol/L.

In this case, pH is lower than 7.35, indicating acidosis. BE is less than -3mmol/L, so there is metabolic acidosis. Finally, PaC[O.sub.2] is found to be less than 35 mmHg, leading to the diagnosis of respiratory alkalosis. Based on all the results, we may conclude that the diagnosis is metabolic acidosis with partial compensation (the physiological mechanisms cannot bring the pH within the reference range) (19).

Case 3: A 51-year-old female patient admitted to hospital with symptoms of fever, dyspnoea and cough. She had been discharged five days before after presenting with CMV gastroenteritis. She has a history of hypertensive renal failure with renal transplant 15 months before and was given prednisolone, valganciclovir, metoprolol, acetaminophen, mycophenolate mofetil and ranitidine. On physical examination, temperature is 41[degrees]C, heart rate 90 x min, blood pressure 170/80 mmHg, respiratory rate 33 x min, and there is left basal crepitation. Blood gases show the following results: pH 7.42, PaC[O.sub.2] 19.5 mmHg, BE -10.4mmol/L.

In this case, pH is within the reference value (7,42), but given the history of grastroenteritis and renal transplant due to renal failure, the first step is to look for the metabolic component, and the SBE is found at -10.4 mmol/L, revealing metabolic acidosis. Then, expecting a compensatory response, a low PaC[O.sub.2] (19.5 mmHg) indicates respiratory alkalosis. Results lead to a final diagnosis of totally compensated metabolic acidosis. It is of the utmost importance to establish an adequate clinical correlation when evaluating blood gas parameters in order to avoid making a wrong diagnosis. In this case, failure to make the correlation would lead to a diagnosis of totally compensated respiratory alkalosis (19,52).


Almost all the physiological variables available in plasma are used for analysing the acid-base equilibrium with the Stewart model, although the model is difficult to apply in clinical practice. The traditional Henderson-Hasselbalch approach may be considered a simplified and readily measured model, which does not change the diagnosis or the initial management.

BE is calculated by the blood gas machine from values like pH and PaC[O.sub.2], the same used in the traditional approach, and it provides an accurate estimate of the metabolic component of the acid-base equilibrium calculated by the Stewart method. So, for practical purposes, the three variables--pH, PaC[O.sub.2], and SBE---may be used to achieve a correct diagnosis of acid-base disturbances, using the proposed algorithm (Fig. 1) in clinical practice.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


The authors did not receive sponsorship to undertake this article.


(1.) Story DA. Bench-to-bedside review: a brief history of clinical acid-base. Crit Care. 2004;8:253-8.

(2.) Kurtz I, Kraut J, Ornekian V, Nguyen MK. Acid-base analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered approaches. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294:F1009-31.

(3.) Corey HE. Stewart and beyond: new models of acid-base balance. Kidney Int. 2003;64:777-87.

(4.) Paulev PE, Zubieta-Calleja GR. Essentials in the diagnosis of acid-base disorders and their high altitude application. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;56:155-70.

(5.) Prieto de Paula JM, Franco Hidalgo S, Mayor Toranzo E, Palomino Doza J, Prieto de Paula JF. Alteraciones del equilibrio acido-base. Dial Traspl. 2012;33:25-34.

(6.) Durward A, Murdoch I. Understanding acid-base balance. Paediatr Child Health. 2003;13:513-9.

(7.) Edwards SL. Pathophysiology of acid base balance: the theory practice relationship. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008;24:28-38.

(8.) Guidet B, Soni N, Della Rocca G, Kozek S, Vallet B, Annane D, et al. A balanced view of balanced solutions. Crit Care. 2010;14:325.

(9.) Boron WF. Acid-base transport by the renal proximal tubule. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;17:2368-82.

(10.) Tresguerres M, Buck J, Levin LR. Physiological carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, and pH sensing. Pflugers Arch. 2010;460:953-64.

(11.) Koeppen BM. The kidney and acid-base regulation. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009;33:275-81.

(12.) Greenbaum J, Nirmalan M. Acid-base balance: the traditional approach. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2005;16:137-42.

(13.) Story DA, Kellum JA. Acid-base balance revisited: Stewart and strong ions. Semin Anesth. 2005;24:9-16.

(14.) Greenbaum J, Nirmalan M. Acid-base balance: Stewart's physicochemical approach. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2005;16:133-5.

(15.) Rice M, Ismail B, Pillow MT. Approach to metabolic acidosis in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2014;32:403-20.

(16.) Poupin N, Calvez J, Lassale C, Chesneau C, Tome D. Impact of the diet on net endogenous acid production and acid-base balance. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:313-21.

(17.) Moe OW, Fuster D. Clinical acid-base pathophysiology: disorders of plasma anion gap. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;17:559-74.

(18.) Liborio AB, da Silva Alexandre C, Noritomi DT, Andrade L, Seguro AC. Impact of chloride balance in acidosis control: the Stewart approach in hemodialysis critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2006;21:333-8.

(19.) Derksen R, Scheffer GJ, van der Hoeven JG. Quantitative acid-base physiology using the Stewart model. Does it improve our understanding of what is really wrong? Eur J Intern Med. 2006;17:330-3.

(20.) Wooten EW. Science review: quantitative acid-base physiology using the Stewart model. Crit Care. 2004;8: 448-52.

(21.) Rinaldi S, De Gaudio AR. Strong ion difference and strong anion gap: the Stewart approach to acid base disturbances. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2005;16:395-402.

(22.) Maciel AT, Park M. Differences in acid-base behavior between intensive care unit survivors and nonsurvivors using both a physicochemical and a standard base excess approach: a prospective, observational study. J Crit Care. 2009;24:477-83.

(23.) Rastegar A. Clinical utility of Stewart's method in diagnosis and management of acid-base disorders. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:1267-74.

(24.) Morgan TJ. The meaning of acid-base abnormalities in the intensive care unit: part III--effects of fluid administration. Crit Care. 2005;9:204-11.

(25.) Kaplan LJ, Frangos S. Clinical review: acid-base abnormalities in the intensive care unit--part II. Crit Care. 2005;9:198-203.

(26.) Cowley NJ, Owen A, Bion JF. Interpreting arterial blood gas results. BMJ. 2013;346:f16.

(27.) FitzSullivan E, Salim A, Demetriades D, Asensio J, Martin MJ. Serum bicarbonate may replace the arterial base deficit in the trauma intensive care unit. Am J Surg. 2005;190:941-6.

(28.) Noritomi DT, Soriano FG, Kellum JA, Cappi SB, Biselli PJ, Liborio AB, et al. Metabolic acidosis in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a longitudinal quantitative study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2733-9.

(29.) Boyle M, Baldwin I. Introduction to an alternate view of acid/base balance: the strong ion difference or Stewart approach. Aust Crit Care. 2002;15:14-20.

(30.) Martin MJ, FitzSullivan E, Salim A, Brown CV, Demetriades D, Long W. Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit: which one do you trust? Am J Surg. 2006;191:625-30.

(31.) Englehart MS, Schreiber MA. Measurement of acid-base resuscitation endpoints: lactate, base deficit, bicarbonate or what? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:569-74.

(32.) Zehtabchi S, Soghoian S, Sinert R. Utility of Stewart's strong ion difference as a predictor of major injury after trauma in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:938-41.

(33.) Morgan TJ. Invited commentary: putting standard base excess to the test. J Crit Care. 2009;24:492-3.

(34.) Moviat M, van Haren F, van der Hoeven H. Conventional or physicochemical approach in intensive care unit patients with metabolic acidosis. Crit Care. 2003;7:R41-5.

(35.) Mallat J, Michel D, Salaun P, Thevenin D, Tronchon L. Defining metabolic acidosis in patients with septic shock using Stewart approach. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:391-8.

(36.) Wooten EW. A new predictive formula for calculation of equilibrium pH: a step back in time. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;298:F471.

(37.) Adrogue HJ, Gennari FJ, Galla JH, Madias NE. Assessing acid-base disorders. Kidney Int. 2009;76:1239-47.

(38.) Berend K. Acid-base pathophysiology after 130 years: confusing, irrational and controversial. J Nephrol. 2013;26:254-65.

(39.) Kaplan LJ, Kellum JA. Initial pH, base deficit, lactate, anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap predict outcome from major vascular injury. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1120-4.

(40.) Laverde Sabogal CE, Correa Rivera AF, Joya Higuera AY. Lactate and base deficit in trauma: prognostic value. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2014;42:60-4.

(41.) Kellum JA, Song M, Li J. Science review: extracellular acidosis and the immune response: clinical and physiologic implications. Crit Care. 2004;8:331-6.

(42.) Arnett TR. Extracellular pH regulates bone cell function. J Nutr. 2008;138:415S-8S.

(43.) Wiener SW. Toxicologic acid-base disorders. Emerg Med Clin NAm. 2014;32:149-65.

(44.) Day J, Pandit JJ. Analysis of blood gases and acid-base balance. Surgery (Oxford). 2011;29:107-11.

(45.) Dzierba AL, Abraham P. A practical approach to understanding acid-base abnormalities in critical illness. J Pharm Pract. 2011;24:17-26.

(46.) Palmer BF. Approach to fluid and electrolyte disorders and acid-base problems. Prim Care. 2008;35:195-213.

(47.) Whittier WL, Rutecki GW. Primer on clinical acid-base problem solving. Dis Mon. 2004;50:122-62.

(48.) Baylis C, Till C. Interpretation of arterial blood gases. Surgery. 2009;27:470-4.

(49.) Goel N, Calvert J. Understanding blood gases/acid-base balance. Paediatr Child Health. 2012;22:142-8.

(50.) Centor RM, Wargo KA. ABCs of ABGs: a guide to interpreting acid-base disorders. Hosp Pharm. 2008;43:808-15.

(51.) Kellum JA. Disorders of acid-base balance. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2630-6.

(52.) Mahaldar AR. Acid base and fluid electrolyte disturbances in chronic kidney disease. Clin Queries: Nephrol. 2012;1:295-9.

Raul E. Aristizabal-Salazar (a), L. Felipe Calvo-Torres (b), *, Luis Alfonso Valencia-Arango (c), Mauricio Montoya-Canon (b), Oscar Barbosa-Gantiva (c), Vanessa Hincapie-Baena (d)

(a) Specialist in Critical Care Medicine, Intensive Care Unit, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de adultos Clinica Saludcoop y Clinica Pinares Medica (DUMIAN), Pereira, Colombia

(b) Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Research Group, Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia

(c) Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia

(d) Undergraduate Medical Student, Health Sciences School, Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia


Article history:

Received 22 April 2014

Accepted 18 April 2015

Available online 12 June 2015

** Please cite this article as: Aristizabal-Salazar RE, Calvo-Torres LF, Valencia-Arango LA,Montoya-Cany onM, Barbosa-GantivaO,Hincapie- Baena V. Equilibrio Acido-Base: el mejor enfoque clinico. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2015;43:219-224.

* Corresponding author at: Manzana 49, Casa 11, Jardin primera Etapa, Pereira, Colombia.

E-mail address: (L.F. Calvo-Torres).
COPYRIGHT 2015 Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Aristizabal-Salazar, Raul E.; Calvo-Torres, L. Felipe; Valencia-Arango, Luis Alfonso; Montoya-Canon,
Publication:Revista Colombiana de Anestesiologia
Date:Jul 1, 2015
Previous Article:Lactato de Ringer vs. Solucion salina normal para trasplante renal. Revision sistematica y metaanalisis.
Next Article:Videolaringoscopios: ?la solucion para el manejo de la via aerea dificil o una estrategia mas? Revision no sistematica.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters