Printer Friendly

Epigenetic Mechanisms of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Head and Neck Cancer.

Growing evidence suggests that as many as half of all oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) harbor human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. (1) Human papillomavirus DNA in these tumors (overwhelmingly genotype 16, a high-risk type also found in most cervical cancers) is often transcriptionally active (ie, coexpresses the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7). Despite being more advanced at diagnosis, HPV-positive OPSCC is associated with a better response to therapy and longer patient survival than HPV-negative OPSCC. (2-4) Human papillomavirus-positive OPSCCs have also been shown to have distinct host gene expression profiles compared with HPV-negative OPSCCs, (5,6) indicating that HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCCs are clinically and biologically distinct. New evidence suggests that HPV-associated changes in OPSCC also exist at the epigenetic level, which may be important for cancer progression. We recently reported that, when compared with DNA from normal, adjacent tissue, HPV-positive OPSCC has significantly more differentially methylated CpG loci than HPV-negative OPSCC. (7) In addition to differential methylation of the host genome, there is evidence of changes to other epigenetic mechanisms in HPV-positive OPSCCs. These include modification of chromatin structure, differential expression of microRNAs, and differential methylation of the HPV genome. Another primary risk factor for OPSCC is tobacco smoking, which may also have an impact on epigenetic changes in the tumor. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence of the epigenetic mechanisms that may contribute to HPV-associated disease and the role of tobacco smoking in OPSCC, with analogies to cervical cancer.

HPV-ASSOCIATED OPSCC DISPLAYS DISTINCT DNA METHYLATION PROFILES

By far, the most common epigenetic event in the human genome is the addition of a methyl group to the carbon-5 position of cytosine nucleotides. This covalent DNA modification occurs predominantly in cytosines immediately preceding guanine nucleotides (the CpG dinucleotide). Evidence has now established that aberrant DNA methyla tion and chromatin remodeling associated with promoters, or first exons of genes, are mechanisms frequently associated with the transcriptional silencing of critical genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and other cancers. In HNSCC, numerous studies have identified promoter DNA methylation of such genes as CDKN2A (p16), DAP kinase (DAPK), and DNA repair genes MGMT and MLH1 (8) In comparisons of epigenetic profiles of HNSCCs, there is also evidence that epigenetic changes observed in head and neck cancer are subsite dependent. (9) It has also been shown that subsets of epigenetic events associated with individual genes have prognostic value in HNSCC tumors. (9) For example, methylation of the promoter region of MGMT is associated with increased tumor recurrence and decreased patient survival, independent of other factors. (10) It is therefore likely that epigenetic events associated with active HPV infection may influence OPSCC progression.

Recent evidence suggests that HPV-driven HNSCC primary tumors display a unique epigenetic profile. (11) A recent study by our group looking at differential methylation in different anatomic sites of HNSCC revealed that when separating OPSCC by HPV status, almost three times as much differential methylation (tumor to adjacent normal) was observed in HPV-positive cases compared with their HPV-negative counterparts. (7) Similarly, Sartor and colleagues (12) used similar high-throughput array platforms to show that HPV-positive OPSCC cell lines have significantly higher methylation in genic and LINE-1 regions than corresponding HPV-negative cell lines. The methylated loci observed in cell lines correlated with levels observed in OPSCC primary tumors when stratified by HPV status.

More recently, our group has used such differences in DNA methylation to identify a 22-CpG loci panel that showed a statistically significant difference in methylation when comparing HPV-positive with HPV-negative OPSCC. (13) Among these 22 CpGs were 4 CDKN2A-specific loci located downstream of the p16(INK4A) transcription start site. DNA hypermethylation of this CDKN2A-specific region correlated with a significant increase in p14(ARF) and p16(INK4A) expression in HPV-positive OPSCC primary tumors, suggesting a potential mechanism connecting HPV positivity and expression of CDKN2A transcripts that is separate from tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb, and may involve direct epigenetic regulation.

Recent studies have shown that HPV-positive OPSCC tumors have higher levels of gene promoter methylation compared with HPV-negative tumors. (14) Kostareli and colleagues (15) used an array-based approach to identify specific alterations in genome-wide promoter methylation in HPV-positive OPSCCs, and they identified a signature that predicted clinical outcome. (15) Similarly, Wilson and colleagues (16) identified 43 hypermethylated promoter regions associated with HPV in HNSCC, including 3 cadherins of the polycomb group target genes.

The process of DNA methylation is catalyzed by a group of enzymes known as DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), the most well-studied of which is the major maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT1. In the case of HPV-driven OPSCC, our work has shown increased DNMT1 expression in HPV-positive OPSCC cancers, based on bead chip expression data. (13) Overexpression of DNMT1 has been reported in cervical cancer, so it may be a common mechanism of HPV-driven cancers. (17) Similarly, work by Sartor and colleagues (12) has shown increased expression of a second DNA methyltransferase [DNMT3A] in HPV-positive cells. In addition to altering expression levels, there is evidence that the HPV16 viral oncoprotein E7 can directly interact with the major DNA methyltransferase enzyme DNMT1 via its CR3 zinc finger domain, and is able to stimulate methyltransferase activity in vitro. (18)

The viral E6 oncoprotein may also drive overexpression of DNMT1 through the Sp1 transcription factor. Sp1 is inactive when bound to p53, but in the presence of E6, p53 can be ubiquitinated and degraded. (19) Additionally, transcription of DNMT1 can be regulated by the E2F/Rb pathway. E7 inactivates Rb and causes release of E2F, which can then act as an initiator of DNMT1 transcription. (20) Overall, these observations suggest that one of the underlying mechanisms by which HPV-driven OPSCC tumors alter their DNA methylation profiles is by the targeting of the enzymes catalyzing this epigenetic modification.

TOBACCO SMOKING MAY ALSO HAVE AN IMPACT ON DNA METHYLATION CHANGES IN OPSCC

Tobacco smoke has previously been associated with DNA hypermethylation of CpG sites within promoter regions and exons of tumor suppressor genes, and with global hypomethylation of DNA in HNSCC. (21-24) There have been a number of competing mechanisms proposed for tobaccoinduced changes in DNA methylation. These include DNA damage caused by carcinogens found in tobacco smoke, such as arsenic, chromium, formaldehyde, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and nitrosamines. These carcinogens also increase expression of the eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases DNMT1 and DNMT3B. Cigarette smoke may also modulate DNA methylation through nicotine effects on gene expression. (25) Furthermore, smoking may act indirectly on DNA methylation through inactivation of folate, vitamin B6 and vitamin Bi2, (26,27) which mediate 1-carbon transfers in the methylation pathway, and are critical for ensuring an appropriate balance in methylation capacity. (28) Local (eg, mucosal) levels of 1-carbon moieties (such as folate) can be depleted by chronic exposure to tobacco smoke. (29) Other proposed mechanisms include the hypoxic effects of carbon monoxide, (30) and de novo methylation during embryogenesis as a result of tobacco exposure in utero. (31) The extent to which these tobacco-induced changes have an impact on HPV-positive OPSCC is unknown.

A number of case-control studies have evaluated the association between DNA methylation and OPSCC as well as other head and neck cancer sites, (14,32-34) but no population-based estimates of tobacco use and DNA methylation in normal oral tissue exist to date. From these case-control studies, a number of candidate genes with CpG-rich regions have been found to be hypermethylated. The strongest evidence for DNA hypermethylation (25%60%) exists for the promoter region of CDKN2A gene. (35-47) CDKN2A serves to inhibit the binding of cyclin D1 to cyclin-dependent protein kinase 4, which may also be hypermethylated in lung cancer and OPSCC, and has been identified as a marker of carcinogenesis. (48,49) Other tumor suppressor genes frequently hypermethylated in OPSCC and other smoking-related cancers include RARb, (50-53) RASSFI, (44,54,55) MGMT, (10,47,50,56,57) and GATA4. (58-60) Hyper-methylation of DAPK has also been reported in saliva and tissue samples of oral carcinoma patients, with significantly higher levels (40%) found in patients who smoked for more than 20 years (40%) compared with 11% in those who smoked for less than 20 years. (61) Other genes that have been found to be hypermethylated in multiple studies of smoking-related cancers include TIMP3, FHIT, RUNX3, MLH1, and CHFR. (50,60,62,63)

In addition to gene-specific hypermethylation events, tobacco smoking has been associated with global DNA hypomethylation. (64,65) Repetitive element sequences, including Alu, LINE-1, and Sat2, have been analyzed (66,67) as a surrogate marker for genome-wide methylation levels because these constitute a substantial portion (more than 30%) of the human genome. Tobacco smoking has been significantly associated with LINE-1 methylation in blood, (24) as well as in noncancerous esophageal biopsies in a dose-response fashion with smoking duration, number of cigarettes a day, and pack-years. (23) Evaluating the changes in DNA methylation in OPSCC that may be caused by tobacco smoking versus HPV will be important in future studies.

EPIGENETIC CHANGES IN HPV-POSITIVE CANCERS EXTEND TO CHROMATIN MODIFICATIONS

Epigenetic regulation of gene expressions requires interplay between DNA methylation, histone covalent modifications, and nucleosomal remodeling. In addition to DNA methyltransferases, the enzymes that contribute to chromatin modifications and nucleosome remodeling include histone deacetylases, histone methyltransferases, and a complex of nucleosomal remodeling factors. Transcriptionally active genes are generally characterized by nonmethylated CpG dinucleotides in promoter regions, and nucleosomes arranged in a more disperse manner that favors access to transcription factors and other regulatory proteins. These nucleosome-depleted regions generally have extensive lysine acetylation of histones and are flanked by nucleosomes marked by the histone modification H3 trimethylated on lysine 4 (H3K4me3). (68) In contrast, transcriptionally inactive genes are generally characterized by the presence of inhibitory polycomb group complex proteins, such as enhancer of zeste 2 (EZH2), a histone-lysine N-methyltransferase that catalyzes the repressive histone modification trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3).

Changes in levels of histone modifications as well as the activity of histone-modifying enzymes have also been identified in HPV-associated cancers. As in the case of DNA methylation, the epigenetic changes appear to favor a more transcriptionally repressed state for many target genes. In addition to the increased expression of DNMT3A, Sartor and colleagues (12) reported that promoter regions of poly-comb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) targets tend to be much more highly methylated in HPV-positive HNSCC cell lines than in HPV-negative cells when compared with promoters of corresponding non-PRC2 targets. PRC2 (poly-comb repressive complex 2) is one of the two classes of polycomb-group proteins, along with a group of proteins comprising polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1). In HPV-positive cervical cancer cells, it has been shown that the PRC2 complex protein EZH2 is a direct downstream target of viral oncoproteins, activating EZH2 at the transcriptional level via E7-mediated release of E2F from pocket proteins. (69) PRC2 has also been shown to mediate H3K27me3 trimethylation and recruit the DNMTs, furthering the link between chromatin changes and DNA methylation. (70) In OPSCC, it has already been shown that primary tumors positive for p16(INK4A) had global elevations of H3K27me3, the product of EZH2 catalysis, as well as increased levels of histone H4 monomethylated lysine 20 (H4K20me1). (71) These changes were accompanied by a depletion of H4 trimethylated lysine 20 (H4K20me3). Taken together, the observed chromatin changes point to a global alteration in epigenetic mechanisms associated with regulatory control of gene expression that may contribute to resistance to apoptosis through epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Moreover, EZH2 may serve as a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of HPV-positive OPSCC in future studies.

CHANGES IN DNA METHYLATION ARE ALSO OBSERVED IN HPV-ASSOCIATED CERVICAL NEOPLASIA

Viral infections can trigger host defense mechanisms, such as methylation machinery activation and epigenetic events in both the viral and the host genome. (72,73) Human genomes harbor DNA sequences that resemble retroviral long terminal repeats that, under certain situations, can be inappropriately activated and play a role in malignant transformation. (74) Also, some viruses can themselves regulate expression of their genes through modulation of DNA methylation. (72) Thus, a virus may suppress activation of its genes in a manner that favors the establishment of persistent infection while evading host immune defenses. (72,75) Cervical cancer cell line studies demonstrate that hypermethylation occurs in the late genes of HPV, whereas the long control region and the E6 and E7 oncogenes are unmethylated. (76,77)

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias that contain oncogenic HPV, such as HPV16, are more likely to persist and progress. (78,79) However, the vast majority of low-grade lesions regress spontaneously without treatment.80,81 Although there are many reports demonstrating that tumor suppressor genes belonging to nearly every cancer pathway have diminished expression due to abnormal promoter hypermethylation in cervical cancer, (72,82,83) hypermethylation of only some of these genes has been detected in cervical precancerous lesions, (84,85) and the association of these events with HPV infection is still unknown. (86) For example, a number of studies have found associations between aberrant methylation of CDKN2A with cervical cancer (82) and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. (84) Cervical cell line data suggest hypermethylation of CDKN2A occurs heterogeneously during cervical cancer progression. (12,87,88)

To date, evidence of aberrant methylation in host genes in cervical carcinogenesis has come primarily from cross-sectional studies. (89,90) In addition to CDKN2A, (91-93) these studies have described hypermethylation of cancer genes like HIC1, (92,93) APC, (92) MGMT, (91,92) RAR[beta], (91,93) and GSTP1. (91) Other genes that have been shown to be differentially expressed include APC, Fas, MMP-1, and TNF-[alpha]. (94) However, because of the cross-sectional design of the studies it remains unclear whether the identified epigenetic changes preceded or followed the disease. Also, prior studies each assessed a limited number of potential epigenetic loci targeting primarily gene promoter regions normally responsible for silencing genes, with the broad profile of aberrant DNA methylation events within genes associated with cervical tumorigenesis still unknown.

DISTINCT MOLECULAR PROFILES OF HPV-ASSOCIATED HNSCC INCLUDE ALTERATIONS IN MicroRNA EXPRESSION

An additional epigenetic mechanism that has been recently implicated in HPV-associated cancer is the deregulation of microRNA expression. MicroRNAs are small non-protein-coding RNAs that regulate RNA translation and decay. Global alterations in microRNA expression have been observed in multiple human cancers, and specific microRNAs have been identified with oncogenic as well as tumor-suppressive potential. (95,96) For example, in HNSCC including the oropharynx, miR-21 is reported to be one of the most consistently overexpressed microRNAs, and it has been shown to target several tumor suppressor targets for degradation, including PTEN, TPM1, and Bd-2. (97) Micro-RNAs originating from the miR-106b-25 gene cluster were also reported to be overexpressed in HNSCC. In contrast, decreased expression of microRNAs, such as miR-375, let-7d, and miR-205, has also been reported in HNSCC tumors, with low levels of miR-375, miR-205, and let-7d significantly correlating with decreased overall patient survival. (97-99) Such changes are known to alter cancer phenotype at the molecular level. For example, a companion paper by Jimenez and colleagues (100) in this Special Section shows that suppression of tumor cell invasion by overexpression of miR-375 acts via a reduction in extracellular matrix degradation and mature invadopodia formation.

Although expression of microRNAs, such as miR-21 and miR-375, is commonly altered in HNSCC, there are also changes in expression of other microRNAs that are more specific to HPV-associated disease. Previous work by Lajer and colleagues (101) has shown that HPV-positive HNSCCs have a distinct microRNA profile that distinguishes them from HPV-negative disease, and they were able to identify 36 differentially expressed microRNAs when comparing HPV-positive with HPV-negative HNSCC tumors. These include overexpression of microRNAs, such as hsa-miR363_st and hsa-miR-21_st, when comparing HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors, in conjunction with decreased expression of microRNAs, such as hsa-miR-31_st and hsamiR-193b-star_st. In addition, the authors found significant overlap in differentially expressed microRNAs when comparing HPV-positive HNSCC and cervical squamous cell carcinoma, suggesting common HPV-dependent perturbations in microRNA expression that are irrespective of the anatomic site of the tumor. These groups of HPV-associated microRNAs included increased expression of miR-15a and miR-16, with corresponding decreased expression of miR-195 and miR-497. (101) There is now further evidence in cervical cancer that suggests some of these expression changes (eg, miR-15a and miR-16) maybe driven directly by viral E6 and E7 oncoproteins. (102) Although intriguing, many of these HPV-associated microRNA changes have not been studied in OPSCC, and they may represent an opportunity for further investigation into mechanisms of carcinogenesis in HPV-driven OPSCC.

METHYLATION OF THE VIRAL GENOME MAY ALSO PLAY A ROLE IN HPV-POSITIVE OPSCC

Like the human genome, the HPV genome is subject to epigenetic regulation through alterations in DNA methylation. As described earlier, the E6 and E7 oncoproteins can modulate the activity of DNMT1. It has been proposed that methylation of viral DNA may be a defense mechanism of the host cell, (103) and/or that methylation may be a mechanism used by HPV to establish persistent infection. (77)

Methylation of the viral genome is an emerging area of study. In cervical neoplasia, viral methylation may be a diagnostic or predictive marker, (104,105) but it is unknown whether or not viral methylation in OPSCC has a similar association with malignant disease status. One important difference in comparing OPSCC and cervical cancer is the fact that studies of HPV-associated cervical carcinogenesis have looked at clearly defined stages, including asymptomatic infection, intraepithelial neoplasia stages I to III, and cancer, (106) whereas OPSCC studies conducted to date have focused on primary cancers. (107)

However, recent studies have suggested there may be some similarities between cervical cancers and HNSCCs with respect to viral methylation. In a small study of 3 HPV-positive HNSCCs, Wilson and colleagues (16) detected increased methylation at the boundary of the late viral genes L1 and L2 compared with other viral genes that have also been reported in cervical cancer. Methylation of the HPV16 long control region was also detected in the HPV-positive samples collected. This is significant because the long control region is important for the expression of E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins. (108-110) However, a large study subsequently reported hypomethylation of the long control region and heterogeneous methylation at other regions of the viral genome in OPSCC. (107) Therefore, more research remains to be done to clarify the role of viral methylation in HPV-driven OPSCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike in the cervix, where HPV is a necessary cause, HPV is associated with only a subset of HNSCCs. In this review we summarize the existing evidence of the epigenetic mechanisms that may contribute to maintaining a malignant cell phenotype in HPV-associated OPSCC. The association between HPV detection in OPSCC tumors and improved patient prognosis is well established. Given this, many of the epigenetic mechanisms described in this review have potential as novel drug targets or as biomarkers for response to treatment in HPV-positive OPSCC.

With the availability of 2 prophylactic HPV vaccines, it is clear that there will be a change in the landscape of HPV-associated cancers. However, any impact on the incidence of HPV-associated OPSCC will not be observed for several decades yet. Understanding the epigenetic changes that determine which few cases will progress to malignant disease remains a major goal with clear clinical implications.

References

(1.) Friedman JM, Stavas MJ, Cmelak AJ. Clinical and scientific impact of human papillomavirus on head and neck cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2014; 5(4): 781-791.

(2.) Gillison ML, Shah KV. Human papillomavirus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: mounting evidence for an etiologic role for human papillomavirus in a subset of head and neck cancers. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001; 13(3):183-188.

(3.) Smith EM, Wang D, Kim Y, et al. P16INK4a expression, human papillomavirus, and survival in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2008; 44(2): 133-142.

(4.) Shaw R, Robinson M. The increasing clinical relevance of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) infection in oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 49(6):423-429.

(5.) Schlecht NF, Burk RD, Adrien L, et al. Gene expression profiles in HPV-infected head and neck cancer. J Pathol. 2007; 213(3):283-293.

(6.) Slebos RJ, Yi Y, Ely K, et al. Gene expression differences associated with human papillomavirus status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(3, pt 1):701-709.

(7.) Lleras RA, Smith RV, Adrien LR, et al. Unique DNA methylation loci distinguish anatomic site and HPV status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19(19):5444-5455.

(8.) Maruya S, Issa JP, Weber RS, et al. Differential methylation status of tumor-associated genes in head and neck squamous carcinoma: incidence and potential implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(11):3825-3830.

(9.) Noorlag R, van Kempen PM, Moelans CB, et al. Promoter hyper-methylation using 24-gene array in early head and neck cancer: better outcome in oral than in oropharyngeal cancer. Epigenetics. 2014; 9(9):1220-1227.

(10.) Zuo C, Ai L, Ratliff P, et al. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene: epigenetic silencing and prognostic value in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. 2004; 13(6):967-975.

(11.) Parfenov M, Pedamallu CS, Gehlenborg N, et al. Characterization of HPV and host genome interactions in primary head and neck cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111 (43):15544-15549.

(12.) Sartor MA, Dolinoy DC, Jones TR, et al. Genome-wide methylation and expression differences in HPV(+) and HPV(-) squamous cell carcinoma cell lines are consistent with divergent mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Epigenetics. 2011; 6(6):777-787.

(13.) Schlecht N, Anayannis N, Lleras R, et al. Epigenetic changes in the CDKN2A locus are associated with differential expression of P16INK4A and P14ARF in HPV positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [published online ahead of print January 26, 2015]. Cancer Med. doi:10.1002/cam4.374.

(14.) van Kempen PM, Noorlag R, Braunius WW, Stegeman I, Willems SM, Grolman W. Differences in methylation profiles between HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Epigenetics. 2014; 9(2):194-203.

(15.) Kostareli E, Holzinger D, Bogatyrova O, et al. HPV-related methylation signature predicts survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. J Clin invest. 2013; 123(6):2488-2501.

(16.) Wilson GA, Lechner M, Koferle A, et al. Integrated virus-host methylome analysis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Epigenetics. 2013; 8(9):953-961.

(17.) Sawada M, Kanai Y, Arai E, Ushijima S, Ojima H, Hirohashi S. Increased expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) protein in uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesion. Cancer Lett. 2007; 251(2):211-219.

(18.) Burgers WA, Blanchon L, Pradhan S, de Launoit Y, Kouzarides T, Fuks F. Viral oncoproteins target the DNA methyltransferases. Oncogene. 2007; 26(11): 1650-1655.

(19.) Koutsodontis G, Tentes I, Papakosta P, Moustakas A, Kardassis D. Sp1 plays a critical role in the transcriptional activation of the human cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(WAF1/Cip1) gene by the p53 tumor suppressor protein. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276(31):29116-29125.

(20.) Kimura H, Nakamura T, Ogawa T, Tanaka S, Shiota K. Transcription of mouse DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) is regulated by both E2F-Rb-HDAC-dependent and -independent pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(12):3101-3113.

(21.) Zeilinger S, Kuhnel B, Klopp N, et al. Tobacco smoking leads to extensive genome-wide changes in DNA methylation. PloS One. 2013; 8(5):e63812.

(22.) Breitling LP, Yang R, Korn B, Burwinkel B, Brenner H. Tobacco-smoking-related differential DNA methylation: 27K discovery and replication. Am J Hum Genet. 2011; 88(4):450-457.

(23.) Shigaki H, Baba Y, Watanabe M, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation in noncancerous esophageal mucosae is associated with smoking history. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(13):4238-4243.

(24.) Searles Nielsen S, Checkoway H, Butler RA, et al. LINE-1 DNA methylation, smoking and risk of Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2012; 2(4):303-308.

(25.) Lee EW, D'Alonzo GE. Cigarette smoking, nicotine addiction, and its pharmacologic treatment. Arch intern Med. 1993; 153(1):34-48.

(26.) Piyathilake CJ, Johanning GL, Macaluso M, et al. Localized folate and vitamin B-12 deficiency in squamous cell lung cancer is associated with global DNA hypomethylation. Nutr Cancer. 2000; 37(1):99-107.

(27.) Piyathilake CJ, Bell WC, Johanning GL, Cornwell PE, Heimburger DC, Grizzle We. The accumulation of ascorbic acid by squamous cell carcinomas of the lung and larynx is associated with global methylation of DNA. Cancer. 2000; 89(1):171-176.

(28.) Ross SA. Diet and DNA methylation interactions in cancer prevention. Ann N YAcad Sci. 2003; 983:197-207.

(29.) Gabriel HE, Crott JW, Ghandour H, et al. Chronic cigarette smoking is associated with diminished folate status, altered folate form distribution, and increased genetic damage in the buccal mucosa of healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83(4):835-841.

(30.) Liu Q, Liu L, Zhao Y, et al. Hypoxia induces genomic DNA demethylation through the activation of HIF-1alpha and transcriptional upregulation of MAT2A in hepatoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011; 10(6):1113-1123.

(31.) Breton CV, Byun HM, Wenten M, Pan F, Yang A, Gilliland FD. Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure affects global and gene-specific DNA methylation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009; 180(5):462-467.

(32.) Demokan S, Dalay N. Role of DNA methylation in head and neck cancer. Clin Epigenet. 2011; 2(2):123-150.

(33.) Arantes LM, de Carvalho AC, Melendez ME, Carvalho AL, Goloni-Bertollo EM. Methylation as a biomarker for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2014; 50(6):587-592.

(34.) Gasche JA, Goel A. Epigenetic mechanisms in oral carcinogenesis. Future Oncol. 2012; 8(11):1407-1425.

(35.) Rosas SL, Koch W, da Costa Carvalho MG, et al. Promoter hyper-methylation patterns of p16, O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase, and death-associated protein kinase in tumors and saliva of head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(3):939-942.

(36.) Zochbauer-Muller S, Lam S, Toyooka S, et al. Aberrant methylation of multiple genes in the upper aerodigestive tract epithelium of heavy smokers. int J Cancer. 2003; 107(4):612-616.

(37.) Jarmalaite S, Kannio A, Anttila S, Lazutka JR, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K. Aberrant p16 promoter methylation in smokers and former smokers with nonsmall cell lung cancer. int J Cancer. 2003; 106(6):913-918.

(38.) Belinsky SA, Palmisano WA, Gilliland FD, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation in bronchial epithelium and sputum from current and former smokers. Cancer Res. 2002; 62(8):2370-2377.

(39.) Esteller M, Corn PG, Baylin SB, Herman JG. A gene hyper-methylation profile of human cancer. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(8):3225-3229.

(40.) Bearzatto A, Conte D, Frattini M, et al. p16(INK4A) Hyper-methylation detected by fluorescent methylation-specific PCR in plasmas from non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 8(12):3782-3787.

(41.) Kashiwabara K, Oyama T, Sano T, Fukuda T, Nakajima T. Correlation between methylation status of the p16/CDKN2 gene and the expression of p16 and Rb proteins in primary non-small cell lung cancers. int J Cancer. 1998; 79(3): 215-220.

(42.) Seike M, Gemma A, Hosoya Y, et al. Increase in the frequency of p16INK4 gene inactivation by hypermethylation in lung cancer during the process of metastasis and its relation to the status of p53. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6(11):4307-4313.

(43.) Farias LC, Fraga CA, De Oliveira MV, et al. Effect of age on the association between p16CDKN2A methylation and DNMT3B polymorphism in head and neck carcinoma and patient survival. int J Oncol. 2010; 37(1):167-176.

(44.) Steinmann K, Sandner A, Schagdarsurengin U, Dammann RH. Frequent promoter hypermethylation of tumor-related genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2009; 22(6):1519-1526.

(45.) Ha PK, Califano JA. Promoter methylation and inactivation of tumour-suppressor genes in oral squamous-cell carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(1):7782.

(46.) Shaw RJ, Liloglou T, Rogers SN, et al. Promoter methylation of P16, RARbeta, E-cadherin, cyclin A1 and cytoglobin in oral cancer: quantitative evaluation using pyrosequencing. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94(4):561-568.

(47.) Esteller M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Rosell R, Sidransky D, Baylin SB, Herman JG. Detection of aberrant promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in serum DNA from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Res. 1999; 59(1):67-70.

(48.) Mishra R, Das BR. Cyclin D1 expression and its possible regulation in chewing tobacco mediated oral squamous cell carcinoma progression. Arch Oral Biol. 2009; 54(10):917-923.

(49.) Petty WJ, Dragnev KH, Dmitrovsky E. Cyclin D1 as a target for chemoprevention. Lung Cancer. 2003; 41(suppl 1):S155-S161.

(50.) Zochbauer-Muller S, Fong KM, Virmani AK, Geradts J, Gazdar AF, Minna JD. Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(1):249-255.

(51.) Virmani AK, Rathi A, Zochbauer-Muller S, et al. Promoter methylation and silencing of the retinoic acid receptor-beta gene in lung carcinomas. J Natl Cancer inst. 2000; 92(16):1303-1307.

(52.) Ostrow KL, Hoque MO, Loyo M, et al. Molecular analysis of plasma DNA for the early detection of lung cancer by quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16(13):3463-3472.

(53.) Chen K, Sawhney R, Khan M, et al. Methylation of multiple genes as diagnostic and therapeutic markers in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133(11):1131-1138.

(54.) Burbee DG, Forgacs E, Zochbauer-Muller S, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A in lung and breast cancers and malignant phenotype suppression. J Natl Cancer inst. 2001; 93(9):691-699.

(55.) Kwok WK, Pang JC, Lo KW, Ng HK. Role of the RARRES1 gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2009; 194(1):58-64.

(56.) Palmisano WA, Divine KK, Saccomanno G, et al. Predicting lung cancer by detecting aberrant promoter methylation in sputum. Cancer Res. 2000; 60(21): 5954-5958.

(57.) Zhang S, Guo C, Kong W, Liu Z. Promoter hypermethylation of DNA repair gene MGMT in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2006; 26(1):101-104.

(58.) De Jong WK, Verpooten GF, Kramer H, Louwagie J, Groen HJ. Promoter methylation primarily occurs in tumor cells of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009; 29(1):363-369.

(59.) Guo M, House MG, Akiyama Y, et al. Hypermethylation of the GATA gene family in esophageal cancer. int J Cancer. 2006; 119(9):2078-2083.

(60.) Guo M, Akiyama Y, House MG, et al. Hypermethylation of the GATA genes in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(23):7917-7924.

(61.) Liu Y, Zhou ZT, He QB, Jiang WW. DAPK promoter hypermethylation in tissues and body fluids of oral precancer patients. Med Oncol. 2012; 29(2):729-733.

(62.) Zochbauer-Muller S, Fong KM, Maitra A, et al. 50 CpG island methylation of the FHIT gene is correlated with loss of gene expression in lung and breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(9):3581-3585.

(63.) Sundar IK, Mullapudi N, Yao H, Spivack SD, Rahman I. Lung cancer and its association with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: update on nexus of epigenetics. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011; 17(4):279-285.

(64.) Subbalekha K, Pimkhaokham A, Pavasant P, et al. Detection of LINE-1s hypomethylation in oral rinses of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Oral Oncol. 2009; 45(2):184-191.

(65.) Guerrero-Preston R, Baez A, Blanco A, Berdasco M, Fraga M, Esteller M. Global DNA methylation: a common early event in oral cancer cases with exposure to environmental carcinogens or viral agents. P R Health Sci J. 2009; 28(1):24-29.

(66.) Phokaew C, Kowudtitham S, Subbalekha K, Shuangshoti S, Mutirangura A. LINE-1 methylation patterns of different loci in normal and cancerous cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(17):5704-5712.

(67.) Terry MB, Delgado-Cruzata L, Vin-Raviv N, Wu HC, Santella RM. DNA methylation in white blood cells: association with risk factors in epidemiologic studies. Epigenetics. 2011; 6(7):828-837.

(68.) Baylin SB, Jones PA. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome biological and translational implications. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011; 11(10):726-734.

(69.) Holland D, Hoppe-Seyler K, Schuller B, et al. Activation of the enhancer of zeste homologue 2 gene by the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(23):9964-9972.

(70.) McCabe MT, Brandes JC, Vertino PM. Cancer DNA methylation: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(12):3927-3937.

(71.) Biron VL, Mohamed A, Hendzel MJ, Alan Underhill D, Seikaly H. Epigenetic differences between human papillomavirus-positive and -negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 41(suppl 1):S65-S70.

(72.) Duenas-Gonzalez A, Lizano M, Candelaria M, Cetina L, Arce C, Cervera E. Epigenetics of cervical cancer: an overview and therapeutic perspectives. Mol Cancer. 2005; 4:38.

(73.) Verma M. Viral genes and methylation. Ann N YAcadSci. 2003; 983:170-180.

(74.) Tao Q, Huang H, Geiman TM, et al. Defective de novo methylation of viral and cellular DNA sequences in ICF syndrome cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2002; 11(18):2091-2102.

(75.) Tao Q, Robertson KD. Stealth technology: how Epstein-Barr virus utilizes DNA methylation to cloak itself from immune detection. Clin Immunol. Oct 2003; 109(1):53-63.

(76.) Rosl F, Arab A, Klevenz B, zur Hausen H. The effect of DNA methylation on gene regulation of human papillomaviruses. J Gen Virol. 1993; 74(pt 5):791-801.

(77.) Badal V, Chuang LS, Tan EH, et al. CpG methylation of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical cancer cell lines and in clinical specimens: genomic hypomethylation correlates with carcinogenic progression. J Virol. 2003; 77(11):6227-6234.

(78.) Castle PE, Solomon D, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM. Human papilloma-virus type 16 infections and 2-year absolute risk of cervical precancer in women with equivocal or mild cytologic abnormalities. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97(14): 1066-1071.

(79.) Khan MJ, Castle PE, Lorincz AT, et al. The elevated 10-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97(14):1072-1079.

(80.) Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, Munoz N, Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2003; 88(1):63-73.

(81.) Bosch FX, de Sanjose S. Chapter 1: human papillomavirus and cervical cancer-burden and assessment of causality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2003; (31): 3-13.

(82.) Nuovo GJ, Plaia TW, Belinsky SA, Baylin SB, Herman JG. In situ detection of the hypermethylation-induced inactivation of the p16 gene as an early event in oncogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999; 96(22):12754-12759.

(83.) Brebi P, Hoffstetter R, Andana A, et al. Evaluation of ZAR1 and SFRP4 methylation status as potentials biomarkers for diagnosis in cervical cancer: exploratory study phase I. Biomarkers. 2014; 19(3):181-188.

(84.) Lea JS, Coleman R, Kurien A, et al. Aberrant p16 methylation is a biomarker for tobacco exposure in cervical squamous cell carcinogenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190(3):674-679.

(85.) Brebi P, Maldonado L, Noordhuis MG, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiling reveals Zinc finger protein 516 (ZNF516) and FK-506-binding protein 6 (FKBP6) promoters frequently methylated in cervical neoplasia, associated with HPV status and ethnicity in a Chilean population. Epigenetics. 2014; 9(2):308-317.

(86.) Feng Q, Balasubramanian A, Hawes SE, et al. Detection of hyper-methylated genes in women with and without cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97(4):273-282.

(87.) Kang S, Kim J, Kim HB, et al. Methylation of p16INK4a is a non-rare event in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2006; 15(2):74-82.

(88.) Nehls K, Vinokurova S, Schmidt D, et al. p16 methylation does not affect protein expression in cervical carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2008; 44(16):2496-2505.

(89.) Wentzensen N, Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Wang SS. Utility of methylation markers in cervical cancer early detection: appraisal of the state-of-the-science. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 112(2):293-299.

(90.) Wang SS, Smiraglia DJ, Wu YZ, et al. Identification of novel methylation markers in cervical cancer using restriction landmark genomic scanning. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(7):2489-2497.

(91.) Virmani AK, Muller C, Rathi A, Zoechbauer-Mueller S, Mathis M, Gazdar AF. Aberrant methylation during cervical carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2001; 7(3):584-589.

(92.) Dong SM, Kim HS, Rha SH, Sidransky D. Promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Cancer Res. 2001; 7(7): 1982-1986.

(93.) Narayan G, Arias-Pulido H, Koul S, et al. Frequent promoter methylation of CDH1, DAPK, RARB, and HIC1 genes in carcinoma of cervix uteri: its relationship to clinical outcome. Mol Cancer. 2003; 2:24.

(94.) Martin CM, Astbury K, O'Leary JJ. Molecular profiling of cervical neoplasia. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006; 6(2):217-229.

(95.) Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005; 435(7043):834-838.

(96.) Sassen S, Miska EA, Caldas C. MicroRNA: implications for cancer. Virchows Arch. 2008; 452(1):1-10.

(97.) Hui AB, Lenarduzzi M, Krushel T, et al. Comprehensive microRNA profiling for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16(4):1129-1139.

(98.) Childs G, Fazzari M, Kung G, et al. Low-level expression of microRNAs let-7d and miR-205 are prognostic markers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2009; 174(3):736-745.

(99.) Harris T, Jimenez L, Kawachi N, et al. Low-level expression of miR-375 correlates with poor outcome and metastasis while altering the invasive properties of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2012; 180(3):917-928.

(100.) Jimenez L, Sharma V, Condeelis J, et al. MicroRNA-375 suppresses extracellular matrix degradation and invadopodial activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 139(11):1349-1361.

(101.) Lajer CB, Garnaes E, Friis-Hansen L, et al. The role of miRNAs in human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated cancers: bridging between HPV-related head and neck cancer and cervical cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012; 106(9):1526-1534.

(102.) Zheng ZM, Wang X. Regulation of cellular miRNA expression by human papillomaviruses. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011; 1809(11-12):668-677.

(103.) Fernandez AF, Esteller M. Viral epigenomes in human tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2010; 29(10):1405-1420.

(104.) Sun C, Reimers LL, Burk RD. Methylation of HPV16 genome CpG sites is associated with cervix precancer and cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 121(1):59-63.

(105.) Mirabello L, Schiffman M, Ghosh A, et al. Elevated methylation of HPV16 DNA is associated with the development of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 2013; 132(6):1412-1422.

(106.) Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007; 370(9590):890-907.

(107.) Park IS, Chang X, Loyo M, et al. Characterization of the methylation patterns in human papillomavirus type 16 viral DNA in head and neck cancers. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011; 4(2):207-217.

(108.) Balderas-Loaeza A, Anaya-Saavedra G, Ramirez-Amador VA, et al. Human papillomavirus-16 DNA methylation patterns support a causal association of the virus with oral squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2007; 120(10): 2165-2169.

(109.) Stunkel W, Bernard HU. The chromatin structure of the long control region of human papillomavirus type 16 represses viral oncoprotein expression. J Virol. 1999; 73(3):1918-1930.

(110.) Romanczuk H, Villa LL, Schlegel R, Howley PM. The viral transcriptional regulatory region upstream of the E6 and E7 genes is a major determinant of the differential immortalization activities of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18. J Virol. 1991; 65(5):2739-2744.

Nicole V. J. Anayannis, MSc; Nicolas F. Schlecht, PhD; Thomas J. Belbin, PhD

Accepted for publication December 16, 2014.

Published as an Early Online Release May 15, 2015.

From the Departments of Pathology (Ms Anayannis and Dr Belbin), Epidemiology & Population Health (Dr Schlecht), and Medicine (Oncology) (Dr Schlecht), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Reprints: Thomas J. Belbin, PhD, Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461 (e-mail: tom.belbin@einstein.yu.edu).
COPYRIGHT 2015 College of American Pathologists
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Anayannis, Nicole V.J.; Schlecht, Nicolas F.; Belbin, Thomas J.
Publication:Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Date:Nov 1, 2015
Words:6570
Previous Article:The Role of High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus Testing in the Surveillance of Cervical Cancer After Treatment.
Next Article:The Pathologist Workforce in the United States: II. An Interactive Modeling Tool for Analyzing Future Qualitative and Quantitative Staffing Demands...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters