Printer Friendly

Environmental perception and use of fauna from a Private Natural Heritage Reserve (RPPN) in Brazilian semiarid/Percepcao ambiental e usos da fauna de uma Reserva Particular do Patrimonio Natural (RPPN) no semiarido brasileiro.

Introduction

The growing environmental problems have required concrete measurements towards the nature protection; in this context we highlight the creation of the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC). The Conservation Units (UC's), created from this system, are one of the strategies of nature protection that aims to conserve and preserve natural resources. However, Diegues (2001) states that the mere lack of UC's does not mean the absence of biodiversity conservation, as the implementation of new conservation areas, alone, has not produced expected results. This author also mentions that, besides this alternative, should consider the relationship man--nature, as well as the analysis of socio-cultural knowledge characteristic of traditional societies, which may point more appropriate ways to occupy the space based on the sustained management of the environment. Hence the relevance of the studies about environmental perception of communities that keep direct contact with the environment and depend on it (MAROTI et al., 2000, SANTOS et al., 2000, WHYTE, 1978).

The concept of Environmental Perception (PA) employed in this study, encompasses the awareness and understanding of the environment by the man, in a broadest sense, involving much more than a single sensory perception, such as vision or hearing, as indicated by Whyte (1978).

Coupled to this concept of PA, will be used tools from ethnozoology research to better understand the relationship between man and animals and his knowledge about the fauna. Studies about the use of animals by rural communities are essential to adequately manage these resources, preventing their exhaustion.

The communities living surrounding the UC's, which had already lived before their creation, have their customs and practices of uses related to native species. As Tuan (1980) says, the life of these farmers is linked to the great cycles of nature; is rooted in the birth, growth and death of living things. Still according to Arruda (2000), the knowledge from these communities may point more suitable ways to occupy the based on the sustained management of the environment.

Therefore, the present study analyzed the Environmental Perception and the faunistic use from the community surrounding a Private Natural Heritage Reserve (RPPN), in order to recover the popular knowledge of this community about the fauna and its uses, aiming to define conservation strategies and subsidies the elaboration of the Management Plan for this RPPN.

Material and methods

Study area

The Private Natural Heritage Reserve (RPPN) Stoessel de Britto, created by the Federal Ordinance 0052/94-N, in May 05, 1994, is located at 6[degrees] 13'4" S and 37[degrees] 2' 25" W and has an area of 756 ha, in the municipality of Jucurutu (Rio Grande do Norte State), Mesorregiao Central Potiguar.

In the vicinity of this RPPN, about 3 km, we found a rural community of Laginhas (06[degrees]14' S and 37[degrees]03' W), municipality of Caico (Rio Grande do Norte State) (Figure 1). This community has 434 inhabitants (214 men and 220 women), with the economy based on subsistence farming and livestock and goat creation (IBGE, 2008).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

This field in inserted in the Caatinga domain, covered by a dry tropical vegetation of the type trees-hrub hiperxerofila Caatinga, with a well defined herbaceous extract during the rainy period (VARELA-FREIRE, 2002). In the Reserve area, there is the Serra do Estreito, with 637 meters high, creating a unique environment that contemplates rich mountain biodiversity.

Methodological procedures

Preliminary exploratory study of the Laginhas community was accomplished through field visits, for a subsequent development of forms to be applied to the residents of the community (one person from each domicile) aged over 18 years, and with time housing over 10 years (CUNHA et al., 2007)

Afterwards, based on the tools from the Environmental Perception applied by Whyte (1977), and used in researches with communities around Conservation Units by Maroti et al. (2000) and Santos et al. (2000), were used forms with open and closed questions.

Between the months of January and February 2009, we applied the forms with 90 persons in the Laginhas community, which corresponds to 87% of occupied domiciles (n = 104). The forms about the perception of the fauna existing within the RPPN were composed by the following questions: do you know the animals present at the RPPN? If so, what? Have you already caught any of these animals? If so, what? For what these animals serve? Food? Trade? For creating at home? Medicine? Others? What do you think about the hunting of animals at the RPPN?

All informations provided were transcribed literally into the forms. The names of the animals were recorded as pronounced by the interviewees, and then they were identified with the aid of experts in each zoology field and named according to scientific standards. The official list of species endangered species from the Ministerio do Meio Ambiente was also consulted to verify whether the most used species in the community is listed as threatened.

From the obtained results we performed quantitative and qualitative analyses with the data. For the quantitative analysis we used the Excel software to tabulate the data and to calculate simple percentage.

Results and discussion

Among the 90 interviewees from the rural community of Laginhas, 30% demonstrated knowledge of the animals from the RPPN. 367 citations were made of animals with occurrence for the RPPN, classified into 79 species (81 vernacular names), 78 genera and 55 families. Among the 79 species, the community uses 41for several purposes.

These results reflect the popular wisdom and show the knowledge about the animals, as well as the uses of wildlife by humans, as suggested by Costa Neto (2000).

The species mentioned as occurring at the RPPN are distributed in percentage into the following zoological groups: birds (52%), reptiles (19%), mammals (17%), fishes (9%), arachnids (2%) and insects (1%; Figure 2).

The birds compose the group with the highest number of vernacular names identified by the interviewees (42); however, the mammals had the greatest number of citations (210) for 14 vernacular names identified. According to Razera et al. (2006), this result may be the result of the visibility of the mammals and greater utility for them, both from the feeding point of view as for other uses. The reptiles were cited 101 times for 15 identified names. The least cited were the arachnids with 2 names and the insects with 1 (Table 1). The latter are usually not remembered by the interviewees since they have no use. Therefore, we observe that the vertebrates are the most cited than the invertebrates, corroborating the data obtained by Razera et al. (2006) and Costa Neto and Resende (2004), which report that the larger-sized animals are easier to be noted, have usefulness and greater contact in daily life. The invertebrates are smaller, less visible and are not so useful. Still according to these authors, in the perceptions from the interviewees, small bugs that may cause diseases and hazards are considered as "insects".

The most mentioned animal by the community was the three-banded armadillo with 27 citations, followed by rattlesnake with 19, scaled dove with 12 and the curimata and wolf fish with 9 citations. All these animals belong to daily life of studied community and are related to the uses of feeding, medicinal and trade.

The three- armadillo is one of the most wanted mammal species for feeding and trade in the studied community, corroborating the studies from Rocha-Mendes et al. (2005) and Costa Neto (2000), which also mention the armadillo as very wanted by people both for feeding as for trade.

The rattlesnake presents medicinal use by the residents of this community, since its lard is employed in the treatment of throat, spine and even to heal other animals. In the studies carried out by Costa Neto (2000, 2006), Almeida and Albuquerque (2002) and Barbosa et al. (2007), the snakes were also included in medicinal item, serving to cure diseases. According to Alves et al. (2007), in study about the use of snakes in folk medicine of Northeastern of Brazil, the rattlesnake was the most cited.

The most mentioned birds by the birds were the scaled dove and picazuro pigeon; the latter being for feeding and trade, and the first indicated by some as valueless or use, and by others for creating at home.

The most mentioned fish were the wolf fish and curimata, quite used by the community for feeding.

The use of faunistic resources by the community

The categories selected for the identifications of the faunistic use by the residents of the Laginhas community were defined according to the uses mentioned for the animals from the RPPN: 1- feeding, 2- trade, 3- create at home, 4- medicinal and 5without value or use (Figure 3). The category 5 with the highest representativeness was the number (without value or use), with 149 citations. This because the informant quoted the animal, but he did not know the use, and immediately said that it was good for nothing.

The second most mentioned category was the number 1--feeding: with 25% of the answers and 105 citations (Figure 3). The most cited animals in this category were the three-banded armadillo, Spix's yellow-toothed cavy and rock cavy, which are commonly consumed as food by this community. This category is also quoted as the most representative in the studies of (RAZERA et al., 2006; SILVA et al., 2010). Apparently the consumption of these animals by the community has a significant nutritional relevance, considering the low economic resources and the consequent lack of material conditions for the purchase of beef.

The trade category was third, with 86 citations and 20% of the answers (Figure 3). The most mentioned animals for the trade were the Spix's yellow-toothed cavy, three-banded armadillo and rattlesnake. These are much sought species by the people to buy, especially in neighboring cities due to their medicinal relevance. According to Alves et al. (2008), in Brazil, as in other countries, the rural communities developed an accurate knowledge of the therapeutic and medicinal properties of the animals. The existence of trade of biological resources with medicinal property also in the cities reveals that the traditional use of biodiversity for therapeutic purposes has been incorporated by urban communities (ALVES et al., 2008).

The medicinal use was a very important category for the community, with 46 citations (11% of the answers) and 11 animals indicated for medicinal uses. The most prominent animals were the snakes (rattlesnake, Red-tailed boa, Caatinga lancehead viper and rainbow boa), and Argentine Black and White Tegu. These are recognized by the community as good medicinal resources (Table 2). These animals were also recorded for medicinal uses in the studies from Costa Neto (2006), Almeida and Albuquerque (2002) and Silva et al. (2010), especially for the treatment of diseases as the rheumatism, asthma, and throat, among others.

The most used part of the animals for medicinal purposes by the rural community of Laginhas was the lard, with nine citations; this lard is used to take or apply on the local of the disease. The disease with the highest number of citations (6), for the animal use, was the throat inflammation. The animal with more medicinal indications was the rattlesnake and the fox, each one with three healing indications. In a study similar to this in the ESEC-Serido, the fox is also used for several medicinal uses (SILVA et al., 2010).

The hunting of animals at the RPPN

Ninety per cent of responses from the interviewed residents of the Laginhas community stated that they do not agree with the hunting at the RPPN, and 10% agree. When they are questioned if they ever had caught any animal at the RPPN, 100% said that they never hunted in the RPPN, since it is prohibited by the IBAMA (Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources) and by the owner of the reserve, but they had already hunted in the area before it become a reserve, because the owner released the hunting and there was no problem. Although they assure that there is no hunting at the RPPN, there are evidences of the entry of hunters in the area, according to information from the owner of the RPPN. Furthermore, the own residents of the community say that the hunt occurs at the RPPN, but neither identifies or points the hunter.

The interviewees say that they think is wrong practice hunting in the reserve, but sometimes is the only way to get food. They think is right, hunt for feeding, however they do not agree with the practice when just for fun or to sell. All are aware that in the reserve, the hunting is not legally released.

Species as the Southern tamandua, rock cavy, oncilla, Argentine Black and White Tegu, nine-banded armadillo and the three-banded armadillo are species endemic of the Caatinga and are the prime targets for hunters. According to MMA (2003)--Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, two species from these, the Leopardus tigrinus (oncilla) and the Tolypeutes tricinctus (three-banded armadillo) are included in the national list of Brazilian species threatened with extinction.

Conclusion

The commercial use of animals is important for this community, because is an activity that supplements the income of families that, mostly, are needy. This fact is corroborated by the uses for feeding and as medicine uses, stemming from the lack of income, but also reveals the traditional customs in this community.

Despite the low percentage of informants from the community that knew the animals from the RPPN, the knowledge about faunistic species and their uses were high. Therefore the knowledge from this community in relation to the use of animals should be considered and used to define conservation strategies and to subsidies the elaboration of the Management Plan for the RPPN Stoessel de Britto.

Doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v34i3.8763

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the residents around the RPPN Stoessel de Britto for their contributions and informations used in this study. We also thank teachers Alfredo Langguth (UFPB), Liana de Figueiredo Mendes and Mauro Pichorim (UFRN) the collaboration with the identification of the species studied.

References

ALVES, R. R. N.; SILVA, C. C.; ALVES, H. N. Aspectos socio-economicos do comercio de plantas e animais medicinais em area metropolitanas do Norte e Nordeste do Brasil. Revista de Biologia e Ciencias da Terra, v. 8, n. 1, p. 181-189, 2008.

ALVES, R. R. N.; PEREIRA FILHO, G. A.; DELIMA, Y. C. C. Snakes used in ethnomedicine in northeast Brazil. Environment, Development and Sustainability, v. 9, n. 4, p. 455-464, 2007.

ALMEIDA, C. F. C. B. R.; ALBUQUERQUE, U. P. Uso e conservacao de plantas e animais medicinais no Estado de Pernambuco (nordeste do Brasil): um estudo de caso. Interciencia, v. 27, n. 6, p. 276-285, 2002.

ARRUDA, R. S. V. "Populacoes Tradicionais" e a protecao dos recursos naturais em unidades de conservacao. In: DIEGUES, A. C. (Org.). Etnoconservacao: novos rumos para a conservacao da natureza. Nupaub-USP, Sao Paulo: Hucitec, 2000. p. 273-290.

BARBOSA, A. R.; NISHIDA, A. K.; COSTA, E. S.; CAZE, A. L. R. Abordagem etnoherpetologica de Sao Jose da Mata, Estado da Paraiba, Brasil. Revista de Biologia e Ciencias da Terra, v. 7, n. 2, p. 117-123, 2007.

COSTA-NETO, E. M. Conhecimento e usos tradicionais de recursos faunisticos por uma comunidade Afrobrasileira. Resultados preliminares. Interciencia, v. 25, n. 9, p. 423-431, 2000.

COSTA-NETO, E. M. A Etnozoologia do semi-arido da Bahia: estudo de casos. In: QUEIROZ, L. P.; RAPINI, A.; GIULIETTI, A. M. (Ed.). Rumo ao amplo conhecimento da biodiversidade do semi-arido brasileiro. Brasilia: Ministerio da Ciencia e Tecnologia, 2006. p. 111-114.

COSTA-NETO, E. M.; RESENDE, J. J. A percepcao de animais como 'insetos' e sua utilizacao como recursos medicinais na cidade de Feira de Santana, Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, v. 26, n. 2, p. 143-149, 2004.

CUNHA, H. F.; VALE, M. S.; JUNIOR, C. A. S.; CAMPOS, R. F.; CARLOS, L. O. Conhecimento empirico dos moradores da comunidade do entorno do Parque Municipal da Cachoeirinha (Ipora, Estado de Goias). Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, v. 29, n. 2, p. 203-212, 2007.

DIEGUES, A. C. O mito moderno da natureza intocada. 3. ed. Sao Paulo: Hucitec, 2001.

IBGE-Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. Censo Demografico. Rio Grande do Norte, 2008.

MMM-Ministerio do Meio Ambiente. Lista Nacional das Especies da Fauna Brasileira Ameacadas de Extincao. Instrucao Normativa no 3, de 26 de maio de 2003.

MAROTI, P. S.; SANTOS, J. E.; PIRES, J. S. R. Percepcao ambiental de uma unidade de conservacao por docentes do ensino fundamental. In: SANTOS, J. E.; PIRES, J. S. R. (Org.). Estudos integrados em ecossistemas: Estacao Ecologica de Jatai. 1. ed. Sao Paulo: Sao Carlos, 2000. p. 207-217.

RAZERA, J. C. C.; BOCCARDO, L.; PEREIRA, J. P. R. Percepcoes sobre a fauna em estudantes indigenas de uma tribo tupinamba no Brasil: um caso de etnozoologia. Revista Electronica de Ensenanza de las Ciencias, v. 5, n. 3, p. 466-480, 2006.

ROCHA-MENDES, F.; MIKICH, S. B.; BIANCONI, G. V.; PEDRO, W. A. Mamiferos do municipio de Fenix, Parana, Brasil: Etnozoologia e Etnoconservacao. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 22, n. 4, p. 991-1002, 2005.

SANTOS, J. E.; JESUS, T. P.; HENKE-OLIVEIRA, C.; BALLESTER, M. V. R. Caracterizacao perceptiva da Estacao Ecologica de Jatai (Luiz Antonio, SP) por diferentes grupos socio-culturais de interacao. In: SANTOS, J. E.; PIRES, J. S. R. (Org.). Estudos integrados em ecossistemas: Estacao Ecologica de Jatai. 1. ed. Sao Paulo: Sao Carlos, 2000. p. 163-206.

SILVA, T. S.; CANDIDO, G. A.; FREIRE, E. M. X. Perception and use of resources in communities surrounding a conservation unit in northeast Brazil. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, v. 32, n. 4, p. 357-364, 2010.

TUAN, Y. Topofilia. Um estudo da percepcao, atitudes e valores do meio ambiente. Sao Paulo: Difel, 1980.

VARELA-FREIRE, A. A. Caatinga hiperxerofila serido: caracterizacao e estrategias para a sua conservacao. Sao Paulo: Aciesp/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2002.

WHYTE, A. V. T. Guidelines for field studies in environmental perception. Paris: Unesco, 1977. p. 117.

WHYTE, A. V. T. La Perception de environnement: lignes directrices methodologiques pour les etudes sur le terrain. Paris: Unesco, 1978. p. 134.

Received on October 15, 2009.

Accepted on August 4, 2010.

Mycarla Miria Araujo de Lucena (1) * and Eliza Maria Xavier Freire (2) (1) Programa de Pos-graduacao em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Cx. Postal 1524, 59078-970, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. (2) Departamento de Botanica, Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. * Author for correspondence. E-mail: mycarlamiria@yahoo.com.br
Table 1. Animals mentioned by the rural community of Laginhas,
according to vernacular name, scientific identification, number
of citations, categories of value or use (1--feeding, 2- trade,
3--create at home, 4--medicinal, 5--only occurrence,
without value or use).

Vernacular name                          Scientific name

Bird                                          BIRD
                                        Fam. Accipitridae
Savanna Hawk                Heterospizias meridionalis (Latham, 1190)
                                          Fam. Anatidae
White-faced                   Dendrocygna viduata (Linnaeus, 1766)
Whistling-Duck
Southern Pochard               Netta erythrophthalma (Leach, 1820)
                                          Fam. Aramidae
Limpkin                         Aramus guarauna (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                          Fam. Ardeidae
Rufescent Tiger-Heron          Tigrisoma lineatum (Boddaert, 1783)
Snowy Egret                       Egretta thula (Molina, 1782)
                                         Fam. Bucconidae
Spot-backed Puffbird            Nystalus maculatus (Gmelin, 1788)
                                         Fam. Columbidae
White-tipped Dove              Leptotila verreauxi Bonaparte, 1855
Picui Ground-Dove               Columbina picui (Temminck, 1813)
Eared Dove                     Zenaida auriculata (Des Murs, 1847)
Scaled Dove                    Columbina squammata (Lesson, 1831)
Picazuro Pigeon               Patagioenas picazuro (Temminck, 1813)
                                          Fam. Corvidae
White-naped Jay                Cyanocorax cyanopogon (Wied, 1821)
                                         Fam. Cariamidae
Red-legged Seriema              Cariama cristata (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                         Fam. Cuculidae
Smooth-billed Ani                 Crotophaga ani Linnaeus, 1758
Guira Cuckoo                       Guira guira (Gmelin, 1788)
                                        Fam. Charadriidae
Southern Lapwing                Vanellus chilensis (Molina, 1782)
                                          Fam. Cracidae
White-browed Guan                 Penelope jacucaca Spix, 1825
                                        Fam. Cathartidae
Black Vulture                  Coragyps atratus (Bechstein, 1793)
                                        Fam. Emberizidae
Chopi Blackbird                Gnorimopsar chopi (Vieillot, 1819)
White-throated Seedeater       Sporophila albogularis (Spix, 1825)
Red-cowled Cardinal           Paroaria dominicana (Linnaeus, 1758)
Saffron Finch                   Sicalis flaveola (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                         Fam. Falconidae
Southern Caracara                Caracara plancus (Miller, 1777)
Laughing Falcon             Herpetotheres cachinnans (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                        Fam. Fringillidae
Purple-throated Euphonia      Euphonia chlorotica (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                        Fam. Hirundinidae
White-winged Swallow         Tachycineta albiventer (Boddaert, 1783)
                                         Fam. Icteridae
Yellow-rumped Cacique             Cacicus cela (Linnaeus, 1758)
Campo Troupial                   Icterus jamacaii (Gmelin, 1788)
                                         Fam. Jacanidae
Wattled Jacana                    Jacanajacana (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                          Fam. Mimidae
Chalk-browed Mockingbird      Mimus saturninus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
                                        Fam. Nyctibiidae
Common Potoo                     Nyctibiusgriseus (Gmelin, 1789)
                                       Fam. Podicipedidae
Least Grebe                  Tachybaptus dominicus (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                        Fam. Psittacidae
Cactus Parakeet                  Aratinga cactorum (Kuhl, 1820)
Blue-winged Parrotlet          Forpus xanthopterygius (Spix, 1824)
Blue-fronted Parrot             Amazona aestiva (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                          Fam. Picidae
Ochraceous Piculet                Picumnus limae (Leach, 1820)
                                          Fam. Rallidae
Common Moorhen                Gallinula chloropus (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                         Fam. Tinamidae
Small-billed Tinamou        Crypturellus parvirostris (Wagler, 1827)
                                         Fam. Tyrannidae
Great Kiskadee                Pitangus sulphuratus (Linnaeus, 1766)
Common Tody-Flycatcher        Todirostrum cinereum (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                        Fam. Trochilidae
Glittering-bellied             Chlorostilbon lucidus (Shaw, 1812)
Emerald
REPTILE                                      REPTILE
                                           Fam. Boidae
Rainbow boa                      Epicrates assivi (Wagler, 1830)
Red-tailed boa                   Boa constrictor Linnaeus, 1758
                                         Fam. Colubridae
Chicken Snake                    Spilotes puuatus (Lineu, 1758)
Brown Vine Snake                 Oxybelis aeneus (Wagler, 1824)
                                          Fam. Chelidae
Geoffroy's side-necked       Phrynopsgeoffroanus (Schweigger, 1812)
turtle
                                         Fam. Dipsodidae
Paraguay Green Racer        Philodryas nattereri (Steindachner, 1870)
Mussurana *                      Boiruna sertaneja (Zaher, 1996)
                                          Fam. Elapidae
Caatinga Coral Snake              Micrurus ibiboca Merrem, 1820
                                         Fam. Iguanidae
Common Green iguana              Iguana iguana (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                       Fam. Polychrotidae
Brazilian Bush Anole            Polychrus acutirostris Spix, 1825
                                          Fam. Teiidae
Argentine Black and                    Tupinambis merianae
White Tegu                          (Dumeril et Bibron, 1839)
Spix's Whiptail                Cnemidophorus oceUifer (Spix, 1825)
                                         Fam. Viperidae
Rattlesnake                    Caudisoma durissa (Linnaeus, 1578)
Caatinga lancehead viper    Bothropoides erythromelas (Amaral, 1923)
MAMMAL                                       MAMMAL
                                          Fam. Caviidae
Spix's Yellow-toothed              Galea spixii (Wagler, 1831)
Cavy
Rock Cavy                        Kerodon rupestris (Wied, 1820)
                                      Fam. Callithrichidae
Common Marmoset                 CaUithrixjacchus (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                          Fam. Canidae
Common Fox                      Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                          Fam. Cebidae
Black-striped Capuchin             Cebus Ubidinosus Spix, 1823
                                        Fam. Dasypodidae
Three-banded armadillo       Tolypeutes tricinctus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Nine-banded armadillo         Dasypus novemcinctus (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                        Fam. Didelphidae
White-eared Opossum             Didelphis albiventris Lund, 1840
                                          Fam. Felidae
Jaguarundi                              Puma yagouaroundi
                                   (E. G. Saint--Hilaire, 1803)
Oncilla                        Leopardus tigrinus (Schreber, 1775)
Striped Hog-nosed Skunk      Conepatus semistriatus (Boddaert, 1785)
Lesser Grison                     Galictis cuja (Molina, 1782)
Lesser Grison                         Fam. Mymercophagidae
Southern Tamandua            Tamandua tetradactyla (Linnaeus, 1758)
                                        Fam. Procyonidae
Crab-eating Raccoon            Procyon cancrivorus (Cuvier, 1798)
FISH                                          FISH
                                        Fam. Anostomidae
Piau                        Leporinus steindachneri (Eigenmann, 1907)
                                      Fam. Auchenipteridae
Driftwood catfish           Parauchenipterusgaleatus (Linnaeus, 1766)
                                         Fam. Cichlidae
Peacock bass                   Cichla ocellaris (Schneider, 1801)
                                         Fam. Characidae
Piranha                                 Serrassalmus sp.
                                        Fam. Erythrinidae
Wolf fish                       Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch, 1794)
                                        Fam. Loricariidae
Pleco                              Plecostomus (Walbaum, 1792)
                                      Fam. Prochilodontidae
Curimata                                Prochilodus spp.
ARACHNID                                    ARACHNID
                                       Fam. Scolopendridae
Centipede                               Scolopendra spp.
                                       Fam. Theraphosidae
Bird-eater spider                         Lasiodora sp.
Insect                                       Insect

                                            Use
                            no.
Vernacular name             cit    1    2    3    4    5

Bird
Savanna Hawk                 3                         3
White-faced                  3     3
Whistling-Duck
Southern Pochard             4          4
Limpkin                      2     2
Rufescent Tiger-Heron        2     2
Snowy Egret                  1                         1
Spot-backed Puffbird         1                         1
White-tipped Dove            5     2                   3
Picui Ground-Dove            3     3    1    3
Eared Dove                   6     4    5              1
Scaled Dove                  12              6         6
Picazuro Pigeon              4     2                   2
White-naped Jay              2     1    1
Red-legged Seriema           1                         1
Smooth-billed Ani            2                         2
Guira Cuckoo                 1                         1
Southern Lapwing             2                         2
White-browed Guan            2     1                   1
Black Vulture                4                         4
Chopi Blackbird              3          2              1
White-throated Seedeater     1                         1
Red-cowled Cardinal          3          3    3
Saffron Finch                5          4    5
Southern Caracara            3                         3
Laughing Falcon              1                         1
Purple-throated Euphonia     1                         1
White-winged Swallow         1                         1
Yellow-rumped Cacique        1                         1
Campo Troupial               5          3    3         2
Wattled Jacana               1                         1
Chalk-browed Mockingbird     2     2
Common Potoo                 1                         1
Least Grebe                  1                         1
Cactus Parakeet              3               3
Blue-winged Parrotlet        2               2
Blue-fronted Parrot          5          3    4         1
Ochraceous Piculet           1                         1
Common Moorhen               3     2                   1
Small-billed Tinamou         2     2
Great Kiskadee               1                         1
Common Tody-Flycatcher       1                         1
Glittering-bellied           2                         2
Emerald
REPTILE
Rainbow boa                  7                    7
Red-tailed boa               17         6         11
Chicken Snake                2                         2
Brown Vine Snake             2                         2
Geoffroy's side-necked       1     1              1
turtle
Paraguay Green Racer         10                        10
Mussurana *                  9                         9
Caatinga Coral Snake         4                         4
Common Green iguana          3     2              1
Brazilian Bush Anole         1                         1
Argentine Black and          10    8              2
White Tegu
Spix's Whiptail              1                         1
Rattlesnake                  19         9         10
Caatinga lancehead viper     15                   9    6
MAMMAL
Spix's Yellow-toothed        14    7    6         1
Cavy
Rock Cavy                    11    6              1    4
Common Marmoset              1                         1
Common Fox                   5                    2    3
Black-striped Capuchin       9     1         5         3
Three-banded armadillo       27    16   8         1    2
Nine-banded armadillo        6     5                   1
White-eared Opossum          3                         3
Jaguarundi                   3     1                   2
Oncilla                      5     1    2              3
Striped Hog-nosed Skunk      13    4    5              4
Lesser Grison                1                         1
Lesser Grison
Southern Tamandua            9     3         3         3
Crab-eating Raccoon          5                         5
FISH
Piau                         4
Driftwood catfish            3                         3
Peacock bass                 6     6    6
Piranha                      2
Wolf fish                    9     9    9
Pleco                        3                         3
Curimata                     9     9    9
ARACHNID
Centipede                    1                         1
Bird-eater spider            3                         3
Insect                       5                         5

* The species that corresponds to this vernacular name Lachesis muta
(Viperidae), does not occur at Caatingas. As in other locations of
caatingas, this name is applied to Boiruna sertaneja,
herein we used this name.

Table 2. Medicinal uses of animals occurring at the RPPN,
according to citations from the community and related by
vernacular name, indicated diseases and part of the animal used.

Vernacular name                Indication             Used part
                                                    of the animal

Rattlesnake               Throat/spine/animal           Lard
                                swelling

Red-tailed boa                   Throat                 Lard

Caatinga lancehead         Throat/snake bite         Lard/Venon
viper

Rainbow boa                    Rheumatism               Lard

Common Green iguana              Throat                 Lard

Geoffroy's               Antiinflamatory/Throat       Meat/Lard
sidenecked turtle

Rock cavy                   Antiinflamatory             Meat

Spix's yellow-                 Hair loss                Lard
toothed cavy

Common Fox             Hemorrhoids/cracked feet/        Lard
                       inflammation of the uterus

Argentine Black and              Throat                 Lard
White Tegu

Nine-banded                    Rheumatism               Meat
armadillo

Figure 2. Percentage of zoological groups mentioned by the
residents of the Laginhas community, as occurring at the RPPN
Stoessel de Britto, Rio Grande do Norte State.

Zoological groups

Insects      1%
Arachnids    2%
Fishes       9%
Mammals     17%
Reptiles    19%
Birds       52%

Frequency (%)

Note: Table made from bar graph.

Figure 3. Percentage of animal species occurring at the RPPN,
mentioned by the residents of the Laginhas community, according to
the following categories: 1- Feeding, 2- Trade, 3Create at home,
4-Medicinal, 5- Without value or use.

Categories of use

5   35%
4   11%
3    9%
2   20%
1   25%

Frequency (%) of citations of animals

Note: Table made from bar graph.
COPYRIGHT 2012 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:de Lucena, Mycarla Miria Araujo; Freire, Eliza Maria Xavier
Publication:Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences (UEM)
Date:Jul 1, 2012
Words:4327
Previous Article:Evaluating water resource maintenance for lakes of the middle Doce river/Avaliacao da manutencao dos recursos hidricos dos lagos do medio rio Doce.
Next Article:Histology of the digestive tract of Satanoperca pappaterra (Osteichthyes, Cichlidae)/Histologia do trato digestivo de Satanoperca pappaterra...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |