Printer Friendly

Enteric pathogen co-infections in the paediatric population from rural communities in the Vhembe District, South Africa.

Gastroenteritis in children is a major global problem. [1] In sub-Saharan Africa, children are 15 times more likely to die from diarrhoeal diseases before the age of 5 years than children living in developed countries. [2] The Vhembe District in Limpopo Province, South Africa, consists mostly of rural communities that still lack access to clean drinking water and proper sanitation. [3] Some people living in these rural communities rely mainly on open water sources such as rivers as their source of drinking water, posing a serious health risk to young children. [3-5]

Diarrhoeal diseases are caused by various bacterial, parasitic and viral pathogens. Among these, diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) are frequently recognised enteric pathogens in children throughout the world. [6-10] DEC pathotypes co-infections with other enteric pathogens are increasingly detected in children less than 5 years of age. [11-14] Studies suggest that co-infections might result in increased clinical complications in infected children. In rural communities of the Vhembe District, few studies have been conducted on the prevalence of diarrhoeal pathogens in children. [4, 5, 15-18] Consequently, data on the prevalence of co-infections have not been documented in these settings, which could be due to cost and the long waiting period for data analysis before treatment starts. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of co-infections of diarrhoea-causing pathogens in children in rural communities of the Vhembe District, South Africa.

Materials and methods

Setting, collection of stool samples and study design

This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in rural communities of the Vhembe District in Limpopo Province, in the northern part of South Africa. Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Venda (Ref: SMNS/12/MBY/0212) and the Department of Health (Ref: 4/2/2). Informed and signed consent forms were obtained from participating parents and/or primary caretakers before collection of stools.

Between July 2014 and June 2015, 237 diarrhoeal stool samples from children under the age of 5 years were collected from primary healthcare facilities in the Vhembe District. Diarrhoea was defined as the passage of [greater than or equal to] 3 loose stools within 24 hours.

A standard questionnaire was used to record demographic and clinical data of each study participant. Samples were collected by a qualified nurse using a sterile stool container. The specimens were then kept at -20[degrees]C until further analysis.

Bacterial analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from all stool specimens using the QIAamp Fast DNA stool mini kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Germany). Three published multiplex-PCR (m-PCR) protocols were used in this study.

A m-PCR protocol was used to indicate the presence of E. coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Vibrio spp. as previously described. [19] Briefly: the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a total volume of 20 [micro]L containing 1 X QIAGEN multiplex PCR master mix (Qiagen, Germany) and consisted of 100 pmol of each primer, 2 [micro]L of the DNA template, and PCR-grade water.

Samples that tested positive for E. coli were further analysed using the 11-gene m-PCR as described previously [20] to detect diarrhoeagenic E. coli (DEC) pathotypes, namely: enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). [20] Each reaction consisted of 1X Qiagen PCR multiplex mix (containing HotstartTaq DNA polymerase, m-PCR buffer and dNTP mix) (Qiagen, USA); 2 [micro]L of the primer mixture, 2 [micro]L of the DNA sample, 1 [micro]L of gapdh (external control) and 5 [micro]L of PCR-grade water.

Samples that tested positive for Shigella spp. and Salmonella spp. were further analysed using a m-PCR protocol specifically to detect S. flexneri, Shigella spp., S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis as described previously. [19] Each reaction consisted of 1X Qiagen PCR multiplex mix (containing HotstartTaq DNA polymerase, m-PCR buffer and dNTP mix), 2 [micro]L of the primer, 4 [micro]L of DNA sample and 4 [micro]L of PCR-grade water.

All PCR reactions were conducted using a BIORAD Mcycler thermal cycler. The following PCR conditions were used: initial activation at 95[degrees]C for 15 mins, followed by 35 cycles that consisted of denaturation at 94[degrees]C for 45 s, annealing at 55[degrees]C for 45 s, extension at 68[degrees]C for 2 mins and elongation at 72oC for 5 mins.

All PCR products were analysed using 2.5% (w/v) agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 [micro]g) and TAE buffer (40 mM tris acetate, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.3). The DNA was electrophoresed for 1-2 hrs in an electric field strength of 80-100 V, and visualised using UV light (Gene Genius Bio imaging system, Vacutec, Costa Mesa, CA, USA). The relative sizes of the DNA fragments were estimated by comparing their electrophoretic mobility with the standards on each gel using 100 bp markers (Fermentas).

Viral analysis

Viral pathogens were determined using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). Enteric adenovirus type 40/41 was detected using Premier Adenoclone 40/41 kit (Meridian Bioscience, Europe), rotavirus using Rotavirus EIA kit (R-Biopharm, Germany) and norovirus using RIDASCREEN Norovirus 3rd Generation EIA kit (R-Biopharm, Germany) according to manufacturers, instructions.

Data analysis

Data from the EIA and PCR samples were entered into Microsoft Excel (2010) spreadsheets. Data from questionnaires were entered into separate Excel spreadsheets. The average and median of the samples were calculated using Microsoft Excel (2010) when needed.

Results

Demographic data of study population

A total of237 diarrhoeal stool specimens were collected from children younger than 5 years in primary healthcare facilities. The median age of the study participants was 10 months (range 0 - 60 months). Most of the study participants were age 0 - 12 months (58.2%, n=138) and 12-24 months (21.9%, n=52). Gdender distribution was 122 (51.5%) male and 105 (44.3%) female.

Prevalence of enteric pathogens

At least 1 enteric pathogen was detected in 140 (59.1%) of the diarrhoeal specimens (Table 1). Single diarrhoeagenic E. coli (DEC) pathotypes, ETEC 7 (3.0%), EAEC 13 (5.5%) and atypical EPEC 2 (0.8%) were detected. Single viral pathogens detected were rotavirus 9 (3.8%), norovirus 12 (5.1%) and adenovirus 40/41 6 (2.5%) (Table 1).

Mixed infections of 2 or more bacterial pathogens were detected in 58 (24.5%); t-EPEC co-infected with ETEC (5.5%, n=13) and ETEC co-infected with EAEC (4.2%, n=10) were the most frequent co-infecting pathogens detected (Table 2). Bacterial and viral co-infections were detected in 34 (14.3%); EAEC and rotavirus were detected in 10 (2.5%) of the diarrhoeal specimens (Table 2). Fig. 1 indicates single and mixed pathogens on electrophoresis gel using E. coli as positive control.

Children under 12 and 24 months were mostly infected with ETEC (34.8% and 28.8%, respectively) and EAEC (26.0% and 28.8%, respectively) (Table 3). Overall, 190 of the children under the age of 2 years (0 - 24 months) were infected with EAEC (26.8%, n=51), ETEC (27.9%, n=53) and atypical EPEC (17.9%, n=34).

Other bacterial pathogens such as S. flexneri (4.2%, n=10), S. enteritidis (1.3%, n=3) and S. typhimurium (0.4%, n=1) were detected across the age groups. Adenovirus 40/41 was detected in 10 (7.2%) of the children aged 12 months, 4 (7.7%) of the children aged 24 months and 4 (11.1 %) of the children aged 60 months (Table 3).

Of the 48 children infected with t-EPEC, 13 (27.1%) had diarrhoea only, while 36 (75%) had diarrhoea accompanied by other symptoms such as fever (25.0%, n=12), vomiting (25.0%, n=12) and dehydration (6.3%, n=3) (Table 4). Children infected with ETEC and a-EPEC (41.0% and 48.6%, respectively) had watery stools while those infected with EAEC had formed stools (53.2%, n=33) (Table 4).

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of enteric pathogens was investigated in children suffering from diarrhoea in rural communities of the Vhembe District, South Africa. The prevalence rate of enteric pathogens in this study was 59.1%. Of all the diarrhoeal pathogens detected, diarrhoeagenic E. coli (DEC) pathotypes were more prevalent, with ETEC (30.8%) and EAEC (26.1%) being detected at high rates. Other studies have also reported on the prevalence of EAEC in countries such as Mozambique, [8] Kenya, [10] India, [21] Sudan [9] and Vietnam [7] as a major cause of moderate to severe diarrhoea in children under 2 years. ETEC has been reported to cause diarrhoea in children under 5 years [8, 13, 22] EPEC has been recognised as a diarrhoea-causing pathogen in children less than 2 years [6, 14, 23] and is reported to cause deaths in infants. [2, 24] EPEC is characterised mainly by the presence or absence of the bundle-forming pili (bfp). In the present study, typical EPEC of 20.3% (with bfp and eae) was higher when compared with atypical EPEC of 15.6% (no bfp, only eae gene) across all age groups. The Global Multicenter Study (GEMS) which focused on major countries located in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa also reported ETEC, typical EPEC, rotavirus and Shigella as some of the major causes of moderate to severe diarrhoea in children under the age of 2 years. [2]

Enteric viruses such as rotavirus were detected in 10.1% of samples as compared with other studies [25-28] which could mainly be due to the introduction of the rotavirus vaccine in South Africa. [29] Adenovirus 40/41 and norovirus were detected in low frequencies across all age groups. Other studies have reported these viruses cause diarrhoea in children, especially under the age of 5 years. [23, 26, 28, 30] The low detection rate of viruses has led to children, especially those under 2 years of age, to be susceptible to other enteric pathogens as seen in this study. One of the limitations in this study due to financial constraints, was the use of EIAs for detection of enteric viruses instead of PCR. As PCR is more sensitive than EIA, commercially available EIA cannot detect certain types of viral recombinant genes [31] and, as a result, enteric viruses were detected in a limited number of samples. Another limitation was that demographic and clinical data of study participants were not consistently collected by some of the professional nurses as some of the data were missing.

Conclusion

Children living in rural settings of the Vhembe District have been previously reported to be infected with diarrhoeal pathogens such as norovirus [18] rotavirus [5, 17] EAEC, [4, 15] ETEC, EPEC [4] Shigella spp. and Salmonella spp. [5] In the present study, children under the age of 24 months were found to be more susceptible to enteric infections, with an occurrence of 2 or more pathogens detected in most of the study participants. DEC pathotypes occurred frequently in mixed infections with other bacterial and viral pathogens. There are several studies that have reported on the occurrence of co-infecting pathogens in children [12, 16, 30, 32] The most frequent DEC co-infection was ETEC and typical EPEC in 5.5% of the episodes. Crane et al. [33] studied the interaction of EPEC and ETEC in vitro and found that ETEC virulence genes were significantly increased when co-infected with EPEC.

The high detection rate of DEC pathotypes, especially in co-infections, raises serious health concerns for the well-being of young children. Further studies are therefore needed to determine the interaction of DEC pathotypes and the role that these pathogens play in severity of disease during co-infections, as this has not been well defined. Clinical symptoms of all the DEC infections were almost similar, and most cases of diarrhoea were accompanied by other symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomiting, fever and dehydration. In conclusion, enteric pathogens are important aetiological agents of diarrhoea in children. DEC infections were more prevalent, posing a health risk to children less than 2 years of age in rural communities of the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Acknowledgements. The authors would like to acknowledge all the nurses at the primary healthcare facilities in the study area who assisted in the collection of stool samples.

Author contributions. NP was the project leader and supervisor of SEL. ANT was co-supervisor and mentor. JPK and SEL collected samples. SEL and TGB did the molecular analyses. SEL did the ELISA analysis and concept manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing and approval of the manuscript.

Funding. This work was funded by the Water Research Commission (WRC) of South Africa (grant number K3/1750), the National Research Foundation (NRF), and the Research and Innovation Directorate of the University of Venda (registration number SMNS/14/MBY/28).

Conflicts of interest. None.

[1.] Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: An updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2015;385(9966):430-440. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6

[2.] Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): A prospective, case-control study. Lancet 2013;382(9888):209-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60844-2

[3.] Traore AN, Mulaudzi K, Chari GJ, et al. The impact of human activities on microbial quality of rivers in the Vhembe District, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13(8):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080817

[4.] Obi CL, Green E, Bessong PO, et al. Gene encoding virulence markers among Escherichia coli isolates from diarrhoeic stool samples and river sources in rural Venda communities of South Africa. Water SA 2004;30(1):37-42. https://doi. org/10.4314/wsa.v30i1.5024

[5.] Obi CL, Potgieter N, Bessong PO, Igumbor EO, Green E. Prevalence of pathogenic bacteria and rotaviruses in stools of patients presenting with diarrhoea from rural communities in Venda, South Africa. S Afr J Sci 2003;99(11-12):589-592.

[6.] Youssef M, Shurman A, Bougnoux ME, Rawashdeh M, Bretagne S, Strockbine N. Bacterial, viral and parasitic enteric pathogens associated with acute diarrhea in hospitalized children from northern Jordan. Pathog Dis 2000;28(3):257-263.

[7.] Nguyen TV, Le Van P, Le Huy C, Gia KN, Weintraub A. Detection and characterization of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from young children in Hanoi, Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43(2):755-760. https://doi.org/10.1128/ JCM.43.2.755-760.2005

[8.] Nhampossa T, Mandomando I, Acacio S, et al. Diarrheal disease in rural Mozambique : Burden, risk factors and etiology of diarrheal disease among children aged 0-59 months seeking care at health facilities. PLoS One 2015;10(5):e0119824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119824

[9.] Saeed A, Abd H, Sandstrom G. Microbial aetiology of acute diarrhoea in children under five years of age in Khartoum, Sudan. J Med Microbiol 2015;64(4):432-437. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000043

[10.] Shah M, Kathiiko C, Wada A, et al. Prevalence, seasonal variation, and antibiotic resistance pattern of enteric bacterial pathogens among hospitalized diarrheic children in suburban regions of central Kenya. Trop Med Health 2016;44(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-016-0038-1

[11.] Iijima Y, Oundo JO, Hibino T, et al. High prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli among children with diarrhea in Kenya. Jpn J Infect Dis 2017;70(1):80-83. https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2016.064

[12.] Vilchez S, Reyes D, Paniagua M, Bucardo F, Mollby R, Weintraub A. Prevalence of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in children from Leon, Nicaragua. J Med Microbiol 2009;58(5):630-637. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.007369-0

[13.] Kabayiza JC, Andersson ME, Nilsson S, et al. Diarrhoeagenic microbes by realtime PCR in Rwandan children under 5 years of age with acute gastroenteritis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20(12):1128-1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/14690691.12698

[14.] Nitiema LW, Nordgren J, Ouermi D, et al. Burden of rotavirus and other enteropathogens among children with diarrhea in Burkina Faso. Int J Infect Dis 2011;15(9):e646-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2011.05.009

[15.] Samie A, Obi CL, Dillingham R, Pinkerton RC, Guerrant RL. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in Venda, South Africa: Distribution of virulence-related genes by multiplex polymerase chain reaction in stool samples of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative individuals and primary school children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007;77(1):142-150.

[16.] Samie A, Guerrant RL, Barrett L, Bessong PO, Igumbor EO, Obi CL. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic and bacterial pathogens in diarrhoeal and non-diarroeal human stools from Vhembe district, South Africa. J Heal Popul Nutr 2009;27(6):739-745.

[17.] Potgieter N, De Beer MC, Taylor MB, Steele AD. Prevalence and diversity of rotavirus strains in children with acute diarrhea from rural communities in the Limpopo Province, South Africa, from 1998 to 2000. J Infect Dis 2010;202(Suppl 1):S148-155. https://doi.org/10.1086/653561

[18.] Kabue JP, Meader E, Hunter PR, Potgieter N. Norovirus prevalence and estimated viral load in symptomatic and asymptomatic children from rural communities of Vhembe district, South Africa. J Clin Virol 2016;84:12-18. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.09.005

[19.] Mieta SIK, Potgieter N, Sobsey MD, Barnard TG. Optimisation of methods for the collection and detection of bacterial pathogens from diarrhoeal human faecal samples using a novel stool collection kit. Water SA 2010;36(2):159-166.

[20.] Omar KB, Barnard TG. Detection of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in clinical and environmental water sources in South Africa using single-step 11-gene m-PCR. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2014;30(10):2663-2671. https://dx.doi. org/10.1007%2Fs11274-014-1690-4

[21.] Shrivastava AK, Kumar S, Mohakud NK, Suar M, Sahu PS. Multiple etiologies of infectious diarrhea and concurrent infections in a pediatric outpatient based screening study in Odisha, India. Gut Pathog 2017;9(1):16. https://doi. org/10.1186/s13099-017-0166-0

[22.] Trainor E, Iturriza-Gomara M, Ngwira B, Cunliffe N. Detection of enterotoxigenic E. coli in hospitalised children with and without diarrhoea in Blantyre, Malawi. Paediatr Int Child Health 2016;36(2):102-105. https://doi.org /10.1179/2046905515Y.0000000014

[23.] Bodhidatta L, McDaniel P, Sornsakrin S, Srijan A, Serichantalergs O, Mason CJ. Case-control study of diarrheal disease etiology in a remote rural area in Western Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010;83(5):1106-1109. https://doi. org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0367

[24.] Platts-Mills JA, Babji S, Bodhidatta L, et al. Pathogen-specific burdens of community diarrhoea in developing countries: A multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED). Lancet Glob Health 2015;3(9):e564-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2214-109X(15)00151-5

[25.] Mans J, de Villiers JC, du Plessis NM, Avenant T, Taylor MB. Emerging norovirus GII.4 2008 variant detected in hospitalised paediatric patients in South Africa. J Clin Virol 2010;49(4):258-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2010.08.011

[26.] Lekana-Douki SE, Kombila-Koumavor C, Nkoghe D, Drosten C, Drexler JF, Leroy EM. Molecular epidemiology of enteric viruses and genotyping of rotavirus A, adenovirus and astrovirus among children under 5 years old in Gabon. Int J Infect Dis 2015;34:90-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.03.009

[27.] Borrows CL, Turner PC. Seasonal screening for viral gastroenteritis in young children and elderly hospitalized patients : Is it worthwhile? J Hosp Infect 2014;87(2):98-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2014.02.011

[28.] Moyo SJ, Maselle SY, Matee MI, Langeland N, Mylvaganam H. Identification of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from infants and children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/14712334-7-92

[29.] Groome MJ, Page N, Cortese MM, et al. Effectiveness of monovalent human rotavirus vaccine against admission to hospital for acute rotavirus diarrhoea in South African children: A case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14(11):1096-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70940-5

[30.] Stockmann C, Pavia AT, Graham B, et al. Detection of 23 gastrointestinal pathogens among children who present with diarrhea. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2016;6(3):231-238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piw020

[31.] Kele B, Lengyel G, Deak J. Comparison of an ELISA and two reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction methods for norovirus detection. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;70(4):475-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. diagmicrobio.2011.04.002

[32.] Soli KW, Maure T, Kas MP, et al. Detection of enteric viral and bacterial pathogens associated with paediatric diarrhoea in Goroka, Papua New Guinea. Int J Infect Dis 2014;27:54-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.02.023

[33.] Crane JK, Choudhari SS, Naeher TM, Duffey ME. Mutual enhancement of virulence by enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 2006;74(3):1505-1515. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.74.3.1505-1515.2006

Accepted 11 June 2018.

S E Ledwaba, (1) MSc; J P Kabue, (1) PhD; T G Barnard, (2) PhD; A N Traore, (1) PhD; N Potgieter, (3) PhD

(1) Department of Microbiology, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo Province, South Africa

(2) School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo Province, South Africa

(3) Water and Health Research Unit, University of Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa

Corresponding author: N Potgieter (natasha.potgieter@univen.ac.za)

Caption: Fig. 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis results for multiplex PCR amplification of diarrhoeagenic E. coli. Lane 1, 11 and 20 molecular weight marker; Lane 2 positive control eae (917 bp), stx2 (779 bp), ial (630 bp), bfp (410 bp), LT (330 bp), Gapdh (238 bp), Eagg (194 bp), ST (160 bp), Asta (106 bp)); Lane 3 negative control; Lane 4 extraction negative; Lane 5-10, 12-19 samples that tested positive for single and multiple pathogens.
Table 1. Prevalence of enteric pathogens in children less than 5
years of age (N=237)

Diarrhoeal pathogen                   n (%)

Samples positive                      140 (59.1%)
Positive for only one diarrhoeal
  pathogen                            64 (27.0%)
 ETEC                                 7 (3.0%)
 EAEC                                 13 (5.5%)
 Atypical EPEC                        2 (0.8%)
 Typical EPEC                         2 (0.8%)
 EIEC                                 9 (3.8%)
 Shigella spp.                        2 (0.8%)
 S. enteritidis                       1 (0.4%)
 Vibrio spp.                          1 (0.4%)
 Adenovirus 40/41                     6 (2.5%)
 Norovirus                            12 (5.1%)
 Rotavirus                            9 (3.8%)
Bacterial and bacteria co-infections  58 (24.5%)
Bacterial and virus co-infections     34 (14.3%)
Virus and virus co-infections         2 (0.8%)
No pathogen detected                  97 (40.1%)

ETEC = enterotoxigenic E. coli; EAEC = enteroaggregative E. coli;
EPEC = enteropathogenic E. coli; EIEC = enteroinvasive E. coli.

Table 2. Frequency of co-infecting pathogens in children
less than 5 years of age (N=237)

Combination of pathogens                          n (%)

Bacterial and bacteria co-infections            58 (24.5%)
 ETEC + typical EPEC                            13 (5.5%)
 EAEC + ETEC                                    10 (4.2%)
 EAEC + typical EPEC                             5 (2.1%)
 ETEC + EHEC                                     1 (0.4%)
 ETEC + atypical EPEC                            4 (1.7%)
 EAEC + atypical EPEC                            1 (0.4%)
 EIEC + typical EPEC                             1 (0.4%)
 ETEC + S. flexneri                              2 (0.8%)
 EAEC + S. flexneri                              1 (0.4%)
 Atypical EPEC + S. flexneri                     1 (0.4%)
 S. flexneri + S. enteritidis                    1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + ETEC + typical EPEC                      7 (3.0%)
 ETEC + t-EPEC + EIEC                            1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + ETEC + EIEC                              1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + ETEC + atypical EPEC                     4 (1.7%)
 EAEC+ atypical EPEC + EIEC                      1 (0.4%)
 EAEC+ ETEC + atypical EPEC                      2 (0.8%)
 EAEC + typical EPEC + S. flexneri               1 (0.4%)
 ETEC + typical EPEC + S. flexneri               1 (0.4%)

Virus and virus co-infections                    2 (0.8%)
 Rotavirus + norovirus                           1 (0.4%)
 Rotavirus + adenovirus 40/41                    1 (0.4%)

                                      Combination of pathogens

Bacterial and bacteria co-infections  Bacterial and virus co-
                                      infections
 ETEC + typical EPEC                  EAEC + rotavirus
 EAEC + ETEC                          EAEC + adenovirus 40/41
 EAEC + typical EPEC                  EAEC + norovirus
 ETEC + EHEC                          ETEC + adenovirus 40/41
 ETEC + atypical EPEC                 Shigella spp. + rotavirus
 EAEC + atypical EPEC                 atypical EPEC + EIEC +
                                      rotavirus
 EIEC + typical EPEC                  ETEC + typical EPEC +
                                      norovirus
 ETEC + S. flexneri                   ETEC + atypical EPEC +
                                      rotavirus
 EAEC + S. flexneri                   EIEC + rotavirus
 Atypical EPEC + S. flexneri          Typical EPEC + norovirus
 S. flexneri + S. enteritidis         EAEC + atypical EPEC +
                                      norovirus
 EAEC + ETEC + typical EPEC           EAEC + atypical EPEC +
                                      adenovirus 40/41
 ETEC + t-EPEC + EIEC                 Atypical EPEC + rotavirus +
                                      norovirus
 EAEC + ETEC + EIEC                   EIEC + rotavirus + adenovirus
                                      40/41
 EAEC + ETEC + atypical EPEC          EAEC + ETEC + atypical EPEC +
                                      norovirus
 EAEC+ atypical EPEC + EIEC           EAEC + ETEC + typical EPEC +
                                      adenovirus 40/41
 EAEC+ ETEC + atypical EPEC           ETEC + atypical EPEC + S.
                                      flexneri + rotavirus
 EAEC + typical EPEC + S. flexneri    EAEC + ETEC + EIEC +
                                      adenovirus 40/41
 ETEC + typical EPEC + S. flexneri    EAEC + ETEC + EHEC + norovirus
Virus and virus co-infections         ETEC + atypical EPEC +
                                      adenovirus 40/41
 Rotavirus + norovirus                ETEC + atypical EPEC + EIEC +
                                      norovirus
 Rotavirus + adenovirus 40/41         Typical EPEC + S. enteritidis
                                      typhimurium + adenovirus 40/41

                                                  n (%)

Bacterial and bacteria co-infections            34 (14.3%)
 ETEC + typical EPEC                             6 (2.5%)
 EAEC + ETEC                                     1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + typical EPEC                             1 (0.4%)
 ETEC + EHEC                                     1 (0.4%)
 ETEC + atypical EPEC                            1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + atypical EPEC                            1 (0.4%)
 EIEC + typical EPEC                             4 (1.7%)
 ETEC + S. flexneri                              1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + S. flexneri                              1 (0.4%)
 Atypical EPEC + S. flexneri                     1 (0.4%)
 S. flexneri + S. enteritidis                    1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + ETEC + typical EPEC                      1 (0.4%)
 ETEC + t-EPEC + EIEC                            1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + ETEC + EIEC                              1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + ETEC + atypical EPEC                     2 (0.8%)
 EAEC+ atypical EPEC + EIEC                      3 (1.3%)
 EAEC+ ETEC + atypical EPEC                      1 (0.4%)
 EAEC + typical EPEC + S. flexneri               1 (0.4%)
 ETEC + typical EPEC + S. flexneri               1 (0.4%)
                                                 1 (0.4%)
Virus and virus co-infections                    1 (0.4%)
 Rotavirus + norovirus                           1 (0.4%)
 Rotavirus + adenovirus 40/41                    1 (0.4%)

EAEC = enteroaggregative E. coli; ETEC = enterotoxigenic E.
coli; EHEC = enterohaemorrhagic; E. coli; EPEC =
enteropathogenic E. coli; EIEC = enteroinvasive E. coli.

Table 3. Distribution of diarrhoea-causing pathogens based
on age of population

                                Age group (months)

Pathogen            All age groups
                    (N=237)        0 - 12          12 - 24
                                   (n=138,        (n=52, 22%)
                                     58%
Bacterial pathogen
 EAEC               62 (26.1%)    36 (26.0%)      15 (28.8%)
 Typical EPEC       48 (20.3%)    31 (22.5%)      9 (17.3%)
 Atypical EPEC      37 (15.6%)    25 (18.1%)      9 (17.3%)
 ETEC               73 (30.8%)    48 (34.8%)      15 (28.8%)
 EIEC               18 (7.6%)     7 (5.1%)        4 (7.7%)
 EHEC               2 (0.8%)      0 (0%)          1 (1.9%)
 S. flexneri        10 (4.2%)     4 (2.9%)        3 (5.8%)
 Shigella spp.      3 (1.3%)      1 (0.7%)        0 (0%)
 S. typhimurium     1 (0.4%)      0 (0%)          1 (1.9%)
 S. enteritidis     3 (1.3%)      2 (1.4%)        1 (1.9%)
 Vibrio spp.        1 (0.4%)      1 (0.7%)        0 (0%)
Viral pathogen
 Adenovirus 40/41   18 (7.6%)     10 (7.2%)       4 (7.7%)
 Norovirus          21 (8.9%)     11 (8.0%)       5 (9.6%)
 Rotavirus          24 (10.1%)    7 (5.1%)        9 (17.3%)

                     Age group (months)

                    24 - 60,       No data
                    (n=36, 15%    (n=11, 5%)

Bacterial pathogen
 EAEC               9 (25.0%)     2 (18.1%)
 Typical EPEC       8 (22.2%)     0 (0%)
 Atypical EPEC      3 (8.3%)      0 (0%)
 ETEC               9 (25.0%)     1 (9.1%)
 EIEC               7 (19.4%)     0 (0%)
 EHEC               0 (0%)        1 (9.1%)
 S. flexneri        3 (8.3%)      0 (0%)
 Shigella spp.      2 (5.6%)      0 (0%)
 S. typhimurium     0 (0%)        0 (0%)
 S. enteritidis     0 (0%)        0 (0%)
 Vibrio spp.        0 (0%)        0 (0%)
Viral pathogen
 Adenovirus 40/41   4 (11.1%)     0 (0%)
 Norovirus          1 (2.7%)      4 (36.4%)
 Rotavirus          5 (13.8%)     3 (27.2%)

EAEC = enteroaggregative E. coli; EPEC = enteropathogenic E. coli;
ETEC = enterotoxigenic E. coli; EIEC = enteroinvasive E. coli;
EHEC = enterohaemorrhagic E. coli.

Table 4. Clinical symptoms of children infected with
diarrhoeagenic E. coli pathotypes (N=237)

Properties                         EAEC (n=62)     Atypical EPEC
                                                   (n=37)

Clinical symptoms                  10 (16.1%)      18 (48.6%)
  Diarrhoea only
 Diarrhoea/other symptoms          52 (83.9%)      19 (51.4%)
 Abdominal cramps                  8 (12.9%)       4 (10.8%)
 Fever [greater than or equal to]
  38[degrees]C                     16 (25.8%)      6 (16.2%)
 Vomiting                          19 (30.6%)      8 (21.6%)
 Dehydration                       9 (14.5%)       1 (2.7%)
Stool type
 Watery                            19 (30.6%)      18 (48.6%)
 Loose/mushy                       10 (16.1%)      5 (13.5%)
 Formed                            33 (53.2%)      14 (37.8%)

Properties                         Typical EPEC    ETEC (n=73)
                                   (n=48)

Clinical symptoms                  13 (27.1%)      27 (37.0%)
  Diarrhoea only
 Diarrhoea/other symptoms          36 (75.0%)      46 (63.0%)
 Abdominal cramps                  9 (18.8%)       11 (15.1%)
 Fever [greater than or equal to]
  38[degrees]C                     12 (25.0%)      17 (23.3%)
 Vomiting                          12 (25.0%)      13 (17.8%)
 Dehydration                        3 (6.3%)        5 (6.8%)
Stool type
 Watery                            20 (41.7%)      30 (41.0%)
 Loose/mushy                       10 (20.8%)      13 (17.8%)
 Formed                            19 (39.6%)      30 (41.0%)

Properties                         EIEC (n=18)     EHEC (n=2)

Clinical symptoms                  5 (27.8%)       0 (0%)
  Diarrhoea only
 Diarrhoea/other symptoms          13 (72.2%)      2 (100%)
 Abdominal cramps                  4 (22.2%)       1 (50%)
 Fever [greater than or equal to]
  38[degrees]C                     3 (16.7%)       1 (50%)
 Vomiting                          4 (22.2%)       0 (0%)
 Dehydration                        2 (11.1%)      0 (0%)
Stool type
 Watery                            9 (50.0%)       1 (50%)
 Loose/mushy                       6 (33.3%)       0 (0%)
 Formed                            3 (16.7%)       1 (50%)

EAEC = enteroaggregative E. coli; EPEC = enteropathogenic E. coli;
ETEC = enterotoxigenic E. coli; EIEC = enteroinvasive E. coli;
EHEC = enterohaemorrhagic E. coli.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Health & Medical Publishing Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Ledwaba, S.E.; Kabue, J.P.; Barnard, T.G.; Traore, A.N.; Potgieter, N.
Publication:South African Journal of Child Health
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:6SOUT
Date:Dec 1, 2018
Words:4889
Previous Article:Red blood cell concentrate transfusion strategies utilised at a tertiary-level paediatric intensive care unit: A descriptive study on impact and cost.
Next Article:Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: Identifying newborns who will benefit from therapeutic hypothermia in developing countries.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |