Printer Friendly

Enhanced thermostability of a fungal alkaline protease by different additives.

1. Introduction

Proteases are one of the largest groups of hydrolytic enzymes having 60% share in world enzyme market. Among them, alkaline proteases have been maximally exploited in food, leather, silk, detergent industries, and waste management. They are also used as important tools in studying the structure of certain oligopeptides, proteins, and polypeptides [1]. However, their overall potential in industrial processes is yet to be fully exploited. The use of enzymes for industrial purpose usually depends on their stability during isolation, purification, storage, and tough operational conditions. Higher thermostability is one of the crucial requirements of an enzyme for its application in industrial processes as it increases the efficiency of enzyme. Therefore, search for thermostable enzymes or enhancing thermostability of enzymes has been the priority of the industries or researchers.

Stabilization of enzymes in soluble form is very important as it is impossible to use insoluble enzymes in several biotechnological applications including detergent, food, cosmetic, and textile industries. Several approaches were carried out to improve stabilization of enzymes in soluble form, including changing the environment by means of additives such as sugars and osmolytes [2], alteration of primary structure of the enzyme by chemical modification [3], protein engineering [4], and introduction of disulphide bridge and covalent immobilization [5], through the formation of a reversible enzyme-inhibitor complex [6]. Addition of stabilizing agents is the simplest and cheapest method to achieve enhanced thermostability of enzymes. Various types of additives have been reported in the literature such as polyols, sugars, metals, surfactants, and salts. New additives are screened every day, which reflect the effectiveness of this method. However, some of these additives may interfere with the final use of the enzyme due to incompatibility with reaction system, mostly in pharmaceutical sector. Despite this, soluble additives were widely practiced in textile, leather, detergent industries, and waste management as a reliable stabilization method. For this study, only those compounds with a well-documented stabilizer for protease were considered. Stabilization by using such additives follows two paths: one by additive-solvent (water) interactions and another by additive-protein interaction. In most of the cases, additive-water interaction favors the thermostability of protein following preferential hydration principle where enzymes get stabilized. On the other hand, in additive-protein interaction most of the proteins are destabilized.

A large proportion of commercially available proteases are derived from Bacillus strains [7]. Fungal sources are being increasingly used [8, 9]. Although bacterial proteases have been used in industrial processes long before, the high cost to obtain microbe-free enzyme limited its further promotion. Proteases from fungal origin offer an advantage where the mycelium can be easily removed by filtration. The optimization of fermentation parameters as well as scale up of production of this fungal alkaline protease has been reported earlier [8]. This protease has the potential for application in leather, silk degumming, and detergent industries. The present paper describes the temperature stability of a fungal alkaline protease and its improvement by different additives.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals. Malt extract, yeast extract, and peptone were obtained from Hi-Media Chemicals, India. Hammerstein casein was obtained from M/s Sisco Research Laboratories, India. Xylitol and trehalose were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., USA. All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

2.2. Microorganism and Enzyme Production. The fungal strain (Conidiobolus brefeldianus MTCC 5184) used in the present study was isolated from plant detritus and maintained on MGYP (0.3% malt extract; 1.0% glucose; 0.3% yeast extract; 0.5% peptone) agar slants. Protease was produced in 400 L fermentor in a simple medium containing glucose (2.0%), yeast extract (0.3%), and soybean meal (3.0%) as described by Khandelwal [8]. Inoculum and seed for protease production were developed in 1 L conical flask and 35 L fermentor, respectively. Inoculum was developed by inoculating spores from 2- to-3-day-old MGYP slants in 200 mL GYEP medium (1% glucose, 0.3% yeast extract, and 0.5% peptone). After incubation at 28[degrees]C and 180 rpm for 12-16 h, vegetative growth (10% v/v) was transferred to 35 L seed fermentor containing 25 L GYE (1% glucose and 0.3% yeast extract) medium. Ten percent (v/v) of the vegetative growth was used to inoculate the 400 L fermentor containing 300 L medium. Aeration was maintained between 0.8 and 1 vvm. Agitation was kept initially at 70 rpm and slowly increased to reach 80 rpm at 45 h and was kept constant till the end of fermentation (48-55 h). Dissolved oxygen and temperature were maintained at 60-80% and 26-28[degrees]C, respectively. Fermentor was terminated when activity started declining and mycelial biomass was separated from the broth by centrifugation in bucket centrifuges. The cell-free supernatant was concentrated by membrane filtration with

10 kDa cut-off (PM-10 membrane) and used for stability studies.

2.3. Stability Studies. Effect of additives on thermal stability was determined by incubating the enzyme (1000 unit) preparation in the presence of additives at the desired concentrations and temperatures for a stipulated period oftime. Sugars, sugar alcohols, metal ions, salts, and polyethylene glycol were used as additives. Aliquots were withdrawn at regular time intervals and cooled on ice for 15 min and residual activity was estimated at optimum condition 50[degrees]C, pH 9 [8]. The activity of enzyme without additive was considered as control and taken as 100%.

2.4. Enzyme Assay. Protease activity was determined at 50[degrees]C and pH 9 with 1% casein as substrate as described earlier [10] with slight modification. Briefly, the reaction mixture contained 1mL of suitably diluted enzyme and 1mL of 1% Hammerstein casein in 0.1 M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer pH 9.0. After incubation at 50[degrees]C for 10 min, the reaction was terminated by the addition of 3 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid. The precipitate formed was filtered through Whatman number 1 filter paper after standing at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of trichloroacetic acid soluble fraction was measured at 280 nm. Amount of tyrosine produced is calculated from a precalibrated graph of absorbance at 280 nm against tyrosine concentration. One unit of protease activity was defined as the amount of enzyme liberating 1 [micro]g Tyr/mL/min under assay conditions.

2.5. Statistical Analysis. The experiments were run in triplicate. Data were presented as mean values with standard deviations. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out and mean comparisons were run using Duncan's multiple range tests.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermostability of Protease. Thermostability of protease was evaluated by incubating the crude enzyme (1000 units) at temperatures ranging from 30 to 80[degrees]C for 1h (Figure 1). The enzyme was stable up to 40[degrees]C and around 50% activity was retained at 50[degrees]C while complete loss was observed above this temperature. These results are consistent with thermal stabilities of other fungal proteases reported in literature. Penicillium protease was not stable above 35[degrees]C and residual activities after 1h at 35, 45, and 50[degrees]C were 90, 60, and 20%, respectively [11]. Aspergillus parasiticus protease was stable up to 40[degrees]C for 1 h incubation but was inactivated above this temperature [12]. This is comparable to the present fungal protease which retained around 90% of activity at 40[degrees]C after 1 h. The present fungal protease retained more than 65% activity at 28[degrees]C during 24 h of incubation (data not shown). These results are consistent with alkaline protease from Conidiobolus coronatus which was stable at 28[degrees]C for 20 h and at 40[degrees]C for 1 h 13].

The alkaline proteinase from Fusarium culmorum was heat labile and residual activities after 50 min at 24,40,50, and 60[degrees]C were 88, 55, 29, and 0%, respectively [14]. Our fungal protease was more thermostable at 50[degrees] C (half-life around 50 min) than the proteases from A. clavatus ES1 (half-life: 30 min) and A. clavatus CCT2759 (half-life: 18min) [15,16]. The present fungal protease was less stable than Aspergillus fumigatus TKU003 protease which retained its initial activity from 25 to 50[degrees]C and 47% of its activity at 60[degrees]C but was completely inactivated at 70[degrees]C after 30min [17]. However, FAP was optimally active at 50[degrees]C [8]. Hence, all further stability studies were carried out at 50[degrees]C.

3.2. Effect of [CaCl.sub.2] and [MgCl.sub.2]. [Ca.sup.2+] is a known activator of protease activity and also offers protection against thermal inactivation. Effect of [Ca.sup.2+] and [Mg.sup.2+] on stability of fungal alkaline protease was studied by incubating the enzyme with varying concentrations of [CaCl.sub.2] and [MgCl.sub.2] (5 to 20 mM) at 50[degrees]C up to 3h (Tablet). In general, residual activity of FAP decreased as the incubation time increased (P < 0.05). However, decrease in residual activity was lowered in FAP with additives as compared to control (P < 0.05). [Ca.sup.2+] was found to be a better protectant compared to [Mg.sup.2+] at all the concentrations tested. Increasing the metal ion concentration increased the thermostability of FAP at 50[degrees]C. 20 mM [Ca.sup.2+] increased the stability by 2-3 times compared to control especially after 60 min. Residual activities at the end of 3 h of incubation at 50[degrees]Cin control, in presence of 20 mM [Ca.sup.2+] and 20 mM [Mg.sup.2+], were 174%, 56.9%, and 41.7%, respectively. The protective effect of 5 mM [Ca.sup.2+] was similar to that with 10 mM [Mg.sup.2+], but effect of 20 mM [Mg.sup.2+] was less than 10 mM [Ca.sup.2+]. Similar pattern of increase in thermostability by [Ca.sup.2+] was also observed in alkaline proteases from P lilacinus, Aspergillus oryxae, A. tamarii, and Conidiobolus coronatus [13, 18-20]. 5mM [CaCl.sub.2] offered maximum protection against thermal inactivation of A. tamarii protease increasing the half-life at 55[degrees] C from 20 to 140 min. But the protective effect gradually decreased with increasing [CaCl.sub.2] concentration, while the addition of other salts such as [MgCl.sub.2], [MnCl.sub.2], and NaCl did not offer any protection [20]. Addition of 1mM [Ca.sup.2+] increased the stability of P lilacinus proteinase at 60[degrees] C by 2.5 times [18]. [Ca.sup.2+] ion played a vital role in maintaining the active confirmation of the enzyme at higher temperatures [21]. The protective effect of [Ca.sup.2+] against thermal inactivation is speculated to be due to the strengthening of intramolecular interactions in the protein molecule as well as the binding of [Ca.sup.2+] to autolysis sites.

3.3. Effect of Glycine. Effect of 0.5 and 1M glycine was investigated on thermostability of FAP. Glycine at both concentrations (0.5 and 1 M) increased the stability of the enzyme by almost 1.7-2.2 times over control, especially after 1h of incubation (Table 2). There was no additional benefit in increasing the concentration of glycine beyond 0.5 M as the residual activities for 0.5 and 1 M glycine after 3 h were 31.6 and 35.2, respectively, as compared to 16.11% in control. Addition of1M glycine was found to be effective in improving the stability of C. coronatus protease which retained 31% of activity after incubation at 50[degrees]C for 1h as compared to control and the half-life of the enzyme increased from 17 to 42min [13]. Anjum et al. [22] studied the compatibility of osmolytes (glycine, proline, and sarcosine) with the Gibbs energy of stabilization of proteins (on heat induced denaturation of lysozyme, ribonuclease A, cytochrome c, and myoglobin). They observed an increase in [T.sub.m] (midpoint of the denaturation) with an increase in osmolyte concentration without change in Gibbs energy of stabilization. The main factor responsible for the stabilizing effect was correlated with the preferential exclusion of the osmolytes from the protein domain leading to the protein with lower exposed surface, thereby displacing the denaturation equilibrium towards native state. Thus, osmolytes are known to be effective in increasing thermostability and function by promoting the refolding and reactivation of the thermally unfolded proteins.

3.4. Effect of Trehalose. Effect of trehalose ([alpha]-D-glucopyranosyl-[alpha]-D-glucopyranoside), a nonreducing sugar on thermostability of FAP, was investigated in the concentration range of 10 to 50%. Extent of stability of the protease was dependent on trehalose concentration and nearly 2-6-fold increase was observed in comparison with control (Figure 2). More than 80% activity was retained even after 4 h at 50[degrees]C in presence of 50% trehalose compared to 12% in controls under identical conditions. At the concentration of 30% trehalose, more than 50% of FAP activity was observed. Trehalose is reported to effectively prevent protein denaturation and aggregation of denatured proteins at high temperatures. It is known to increase the thermostability of an enzyme by changing its microenvironment [23].

Therefore, trehalose plays an important role in preventing protein denaturation at high temperature by changing its microenvironment and suppressing the aggregation of denatured proteins.

3.5. Effect of Polyols. Stability of FAP in presence of sugar alcohols including glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, and xylitol was investigated. All sugar alcohols increased the stability by several folds over control, with the effect being more pronounced where enzyme was incubated for longer times (Table 3). At 10% concentration, the half-life of the enzyme increased from 50 min in control in the absence of additive to 80, 60, 90, and 75 min for glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, and xylitol, respectively. At 20% concentration, the half-life of the enzyme further increased from 50 min in control to 90, 115, 135, and 95 min for glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol, and xylitol, respectively. Since sugar alcohols were found to be very effective, all the sugar alcohols were also evaluated at 50% which increased the half-lives from 50 min in control to more than 240 min, the longest duration tested (data not shown). It is worth mentioning that 50% sorbitol increased the stability by 4-5 times as compared to control when incubated beyond 1h with 80% original activity being retained even after 4h while it was 16% in control under identical conditions (Figure 3). The residual activities after 1h at 60[degrees]C in absence and presence of 50% sorbitol were <1% and 52.9%, respectively. Though 50% sorbitol increased the stability of protease at 60[degrees] C, it could not offer protection above this temperature and complete loss in activity was noticed within 1h even in presence of 50% sorbitol (data not shown). Water plays an important role in influencing the thermostability of enzymes. A range of low-molecular weight additives, such as sugars and polyols, exert stabilizing effect by inducing preferential hydration of proteins. At least in case of polyols, the preferential hydration arises from an increase in the surface tension of solvent water [24]. Loss of the protein's compact, properly folded structure increases the protein solvent interface which in turn tends to increase the degree of thermodynamically unfavourable interaction between the additive and the protein molecule resulting in the stabilization of protein by the additive [22]. 1% glycerol and 800 mM sorbitol offered limited protection against thermal inactivation of C. coronatus protease at 50[degrees]C 13].

Addition of glycerol, sucrose, mannitol, sorbitol, and starchincreased the half-life of an alkaline protease from B mojavensis at 60[degrees]C by 2-2.2-fold [25]. Addition of 3M sorbitol also improved the thermal stability of B. cereus BG1 alkaline protease at 60[degrees]Cby2-fold [26]. The protective effects were explained by the strengthening of the hydrophobic interactions inside protein molecules and by indirect action of polyols on water structure.

3.6. Effect of PEG 6000. PEG 6000 in concentration range of 5-15% had no beneficial effect on stability of protease. In fact, there was slight decrease in the residual activity at all the concentrations and at all the incubation times tested (Table 4). 10% PEG 8000 offered limited protection against thermal inactivation of C. coronatus protease at 50[degrees]C [13]. Actual mechanism of stabilization by polyethylene glycols (PEGs) is not yet well understood. It has been suggested that ethylene glycol is likely to stabilize polar proteins, while destabilizing nonpolar ones [23]. The effectiveness of PEG on proteins highly depends on the polymer molecular weight and on the protein structure. PEGs with high molecular weights are believed to prevent protein-protein interactions, leading to stabilization. In the present investigation, PEG 6000 showed slight inactivation/denaturation, and inactivation increased with an increase in PEG added. It suggested that increased hydrocarbon chain affects the protease structure which interferes with its refolding.

3.7. Effect of NaCl and [K.sub.2]HP[O.sub.4]. Inorganic salts have been investigated for their influence on the stability of enzymes [13, 20]. Effect of NaCl (0.5 and 1M), [K.sub.2][HPO.sub.4] (0.5 and 1M), and [([NH.sub.4]).sub.2][SO.sub.4] (5,10, and 15%) on thermostability of protease at 50[degrees]C was investigated. Both 0.5 and 1 M NaCl increased stability of protease by 2 times. Residual activity after 3 h in case of control was around 17.4%, which increased to 37.4% in presence of NaCl (Table 5). There was no added advantage of 1M NaCl as residual activities were more or less similar to 0.5 M NaCl. Effect of 0.5 M [K.sub.2][HPO.sub.4] was not very significant but stabilizing effect of 1M [K.sub.2][HPO.sub.4] was similar to that of 0.5 M NaCl. 0.2 M NaCl had no beneficial effect on the stability of C. coronatus protease [13].

Ammonium sulphate, a known stabilizer, was examined for its stabilizing effect in the concentration range of 5 to 15% (concentration at which no precipitation was observed). Ammonium sulphate increased the stability which was found to be concentration dependent (Figure 4). 15% ammonium sulphate increased the stability at 50[degrees]C by 3-fold. Salts such as [MgCl.sub.2], [MnCl.sub.2], and NaCl were found to be ineffective in protecting A. tamarii protease against thermal inactivation [20]. Salts play an important role in thermostabilization by known mechanism of "salting in" at low concentration; here, it also obeys preferential principle of hydration and addition of 15% ammonium sulphate resulted in 3-fold increase in stability as compared to control.

4. Conclusions

The fungal alkaline protease retained more than 60% activity after 24 h at 28[degrees]C and 1hat 40[degrees]C and around 50% activity was retained at 50[degrees] C, while a complete loss was observed above this temperature. Ca and Mg, trehalose, sugar alcohols, and salts like NaCl and ammonium sulphate offered protection to varying degrees against thermal inactivation at 50[degrees]C, while Ca was better than Mg. Among the additives tested, trehalose and the sugar alcohols especially sorbitol were found to be the best stabilizers with 80% residual activity after 4h incubation at 50[degrees]C. Thermal stability increases the efficiency of enzymes and is one of the essential features for their commercial exploitation. The present fungal protease is more thermostable than proteases from Penicillium sp., Fusarium culmorum, A. clavatus, Beauveria bassiana, S. brevicaulis, and C. coronatus but less stable than protease from Aspergillus tamarii.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR, Government of India) for financial assistance. The work was carried out under NMITLI Project on Biotechnology of Leather towards cleaner processing.


[1] C. G. Kumar and H. Takagi, "Microbial alkaline proteases: from a bioindustrial viewpoint," Biotechnology Advances, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 561-594,1999.

[2] M. N. Gupta, "Thermostabilization of proteins," Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, vol. 14, pp. 1-11,1991.

[3] C. Bieniarz, M. J. Cornwell, and D. F. Young, "Alkaline phosphatase activatable polymeric cross-linkers and their use in the stabilization of proteins," Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 390-398,1998.

[4] P. N. Bryan, "Protein engineering of subtilisin," Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1543, no. 2, pp. 203-222, 2000.

[5] J. Parrado, F. Millan, and J. Bautista, "Kerase immobilization by covalent attachment to porous glass," Process Biochemistry, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 735-741,1995.

[6] J. Pandhare, K. Zog, and V. V. Deshpande, "Differential stabilities of alkaline protease inhibitors from actinomycetes: effect of various additives on thermostability," Bioresource Technology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 165-169, 2002.

[7] R. Gupta, Q. K. Beg, S. Khan, and B. Chahuan, "An overview on fermentation, down stream processing and properties of microbial alkaline proteases," Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 60, pp. 381-395, 2002.

[8] H. Khandelwal, Production, purification and characterization of fungal alkaline protease and its applications, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India, 2013.

[9] S. U. Phadatare, V V Deshpande, and M. C. Srinivasan, "High activity alkaline protease from Conidiobolus coronatus (NCL 86.8.20): enzyme production and compatibility with commercial detergents," Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 72-76,1993.

[10] R. S. Laxman, A. P Sonawane, S. V. More et al., "Optimization and scale up of production of alkaline protease from Conidiobolus coronatus," Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 3152-3158, 2005.

[11] S. Germano, A. Pandey, C. A. Osaku, S. N. Rocha, and C. R. Soccol, "Characterization and stability of proteases from Penicillium sp. produced by solid-state fermentation," Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 246-251, 2003.

[12] R. Tunga, B. Shrivastava, and R. Banerjee, "Purification and characterization of a protease from solid state cultures of Aspergillus parasiticus," Process Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1553-1558, 2003.

[13] S. H. Bhosale, M. B. Rao, V. V. Deshpande, and M. C. Srinivasan, "Thermostability of high-activity alkaline protease from Conidiobolus coronatus (NCL 86.8.20)," Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 136-139,1995.

[14] A. I. Pekkarinen, B. L. Jones, andM. Niku-Paavola, "Purification and properties of an alkaline proteinase of Fusarium culmorum," European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 269, no. 3, pp. 798-807, 2002.

[15] M. Hajji, S. Kanoun, M. Nasri, and N. Gharsallah, "Purification and characterization ofan alkaline serine-protease produced by a new isolated Aspergillus clavatus ES1," Process Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 791-797, 2007.

[16] C. R. Tremacoldi, R. Monti, H. S. Selistre-De-Araujo, and E. C. Carmona, "Purification and properties of an alkaline protease of Aspergillus clavatus," World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 295-299, 2007.

[17] S. Wang, Y. Chen, C. Wang, Y. Yen, and M. Chern, "Purification and characterization of a serine protease extracellularly produced by Aspergillus fumigatus in a shrimp and crab shell powder medium," Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 36, no. 5-6, pp. 660-665, 2005.

[18] E. K. Kotlova, N. M. Ivanova, M. P. Yusupova, T L. Voyushina, N. E. Ivanushkina, and G. G. Chestukhina, "Thiol-dependent serine proteinase from Paecilomyces lilacinus: purification and catalytic properties," Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 117-123, 2007.

[19] K. Ikegaya, S. Sugio, K. Murakami, and K. Yamanouchi, "Kinetic analysis of enhanced thermal stability of an alkaline protease with engineered twin disulfide bridges and calcium-dependent stability," Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 187-192, 2003.

[20] C. G. Boer and R. M. Peralta, "Production of extracellular protease by Aspergillus tamarii," Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 75-81, 2000.

[21] H. S. Joo, C. G. Kumar, G. C. Park, S. R. Paik, and C. S. Chang, "Oxidant and SDS-stable alkaline protease from Bacillus clausii I-52: production and some properties," Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 267-272, 2003.

[22] F. Anjum, V. Rishi, and F. Ahmad, "Compatibility of osmolytes with Gibbs energy of stabilization of proteins," Biochimica et Biophysica Acta--Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, vol. 1476, no. 1, pp. 75-84, 2000.

[23] C. O. Fagain, "Enzyme stabilization-recent experimental progress," Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 33, pp. 137-149, 2003.

[24] J. K. Kaushik and R. Bhat, "Thermal stability of proteins in aqueous polyol solutions: role of the surface tension of water in the stabilizing effect of polyols," Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 36, pp. 7058-7066, 1998.

[25] Q. K. Beg and R. Gupta, "Purification and characterization of an oxidation-stable, thiol-dependent serine alkaline protease from Bacillus mojavensis," Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 294-304, 2003.

[26] B. Ghorbel, A. Sellami-Kamoun, and M. Nasri, "Stability studies of protease from Bacillus cereus BG1," Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 513-518, 2003.

Nilesh P. Nirmal (1) and R. Seeta Laxman (2)

(1) Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Burapha University, 169 Bangsaen Road, Saensook, Muang, Chonburi 20131, Thailand

(2) Division of Biochemical Sciences, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411 008, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Nilesh P. Nirmal;

Received 24 February 2014; Revised 12 June 2014; Accepted 17 June 2014; Published 3 July 2014

Academic Editor: Qi-Zhuang Ye

TABLE 1: Effect of Ca[Cl.sub.2] and Mg[Cl.sub.2] on thermostability of
fungal alkaline protease during 3 h of incubation at 50[degrees]C.

Time                   Residual activity (%)


0                100                      100
30      73.4 [+ or -] 0.91 (d)   81.5 [+ or -] 1.92 (c)
60      44.4 [+ or -] 0.48 (f)   61.1 [+ or -] 0.65 (d)
120     22.7 [+ or -] 0.19 (g)   44.0 [+ or -] 0.44 (e)
180     17.4 [+ or -] 0.38 (g)   34.8 [+ or -] 0.42 (d)

Time                 Residual activity (%)
                        Ca[Cl.sub.2] (mM)

                  10                       20

0                100                      100
30      91.7 [+ or -] 1.3 (b)    96.9 [+ or -] 1.64 (a)
60      73.2 [+ or -] 0.35 (b)   79.8 [+ or -] 1.34 (a)
120     63.8 [+ or -] 1.00 (b)   68.1 [+ or -] 1.13 (a)
180     54.6 [+ or -] 2.44 (b)   56.9 [+ or -] 0.89 (a)

Time                   Residual activity (%)
                         Mg[Cl.sub.2] (mM)

                  5                        10

0                100                      100
30      72.7 [+ or -] 0.21 (d)   91.9 [+ or -] 0.89 (b)
60      54.7 [+ or -] 0.72 (e)   64.3 [+ or -] 1.16 (d)
120     39.0 [+ or -] 0.49 (f)   47.2 [+ or -] 0.48 (d)
180     28.3 [+ or -] 0.40 (f)   32.2 [+ or -] 0.46 (e)

Time    Residual activity (%)
          Mg[Cl.sub.2] (mM)


0                100
30      91.8 [+ or -] 0.64 (b)
60      70.3 [+ or -] 1.37 (c)
120     58.8 [+ or -] 0.31 (c)
180     41.7 [+ or -] 0.41 (c)

Values represent mean [+ or -] SD from triplicates. Different small
letters in the same row indicate significant difference
(P < 0.05).

TABLE 2: Effect of glycine on thermostability of fungal
alkaline protease during 3 h of incubation at 50[degrees]C.


0                100
60      43.8 [+ or -] 0.72 (c)
120     23.3 [+ or -] 0.38 (c)
180     16.1 [+ or -] .043 (c)

Time                  Residual activity (%)
                            Glycine (M)

                 0.5                       1

0                100                      100
60      54.2 [+ or -] 0.60 (b)   56.3 [+ or -] 0.41 (a)
120     39.9 [+ or -] 0.53 (a)   40.1 [+ or -] 0.63 (a)
180     31.6 [+ or -] 0.43 (b)   35.2 [+ or -] 0.12 (a)

Values represent mean [+ or -] SD from triplicates. Different
small letters in the same row indicate significant difference
(P < 0.05).

TABLE 3: Effect of different sugar alcohols on thermostability of
fungal alkaline protease during 3 h of incubation at 50[degrees]C.

        Residual activity (%)

Time           Control

0                100
30      69.7 [+ or -] 1.42 (d)
60      43.6 [+ or -] 0.93 (e)
120     23.8 [+ or -] 0.25 (f)
180     17.0 [+ or -] 0.10 (e)

                     Residual activity (%)

Time                        Glycerol
                 10%                      20%

0                100                      100
30      68.0 [+ or -] 0.31 (d)   74.7 [+ or -] 1.10 (c)
60      55.9 [+ or -] 1.26 (d)   62.0 [+ or -] 1.66 (b)
120     35.3 [+ or -] 0.65 (e)   37.0 [+ or -] 0.46 (d)
180     28.0 [+ or -] 0.19 (d)   31.7 [+ or -] 0.26 (c)

                      Residual activity (%)

Time                        Mannitol
                 10%                      20%

0                100                      100
30      68.1 [+ or -] 0.74 (d)   74.1 [+ or -] 1.72 (c)
60      54.1 [+ or -] 0.88 (d)   64.4 [+ or -] 0.15 (b)
120     33.6 [+ or -] 0.61 (e)   48.7 [+ or -] 0.31 (b)
180     27.2 [+ or -] 0.47 (d)   40.7 [+ or -] 0.46 (b)

                      Residual activity (%)

Time                        Sorbitol
                 10%                      20%

0                100                      100
30      79.2 [+ or -] 1.78 (b)   84.0 [+ or -] 1.84 (a)
60      59.7 [+ or -] 0.09 (c)   70.7 [+ or -] 0.58 (a)
120     42.5 [+ or -] 0.50 (c)   51.6 [+ or -] 0.39 (a)
180     31.1 [+ or -] 0.21 (c)   47.1 [+ or -] 0.55 (a)

                      Residual activity (%)

Time                         Xylitol
                 10%                      20%

0                100                      100
30      68.1 [+ or -] 2.08 (d)   74.3 [+ or -] 1.72 (c)
60      55.3 [+ or -] 0.17 (d)   63.4 [+ or -] 0.31 (b)
120     38.5 [+ or -] 0.68 (d)   44.6 [+ or -] 1.07 (c)
180     29.3 [+ or -] 0.19 (d)   39.2 [+ or -] 0.48 (b)

Values represent mean [+ or -] SD from triplicates. Different
small letters in the same row indicate significant difference
(P < 0.05)

TABLE 4: Effect of PEG 6000 onthermostability of fungal alkaline
protease during 3 h of incubation at 50[degrees]C.

                                 Residual activity (%)

Time           Control                  PEG (%)

0                100                      100
30      68.0 [+ or -] 1.17 (a)   52.4 [+ or -] 0.75 (b)
60      43.2 [+ or -] 0.20 (a)   37.9 [+ or -] 1.03 (b)
120     22.5 [+ or -] 0.05 (a)   21.2 [+ or -] 0.50 (a)
180     16.7 [+ or -] 0.12 (a)   12.4 [+ or -] 0.05 (b)

                      Residual activity (%)

Time                         PEG (%)
                  10                       15

0                100                      100
30      53.6 [+ or -] 2.15 (b)   38.9 [+ or -] 1.02 (c)
60      32.9 [+ or -] 0.29 (c)   19.1 [+ or -] 0.16 (d)
120     18.6 [+ or -] 0.29 (b)   11.6 [+ or -] 0.18 (c)
180     10.9 [+ or -] 0.30 (c)    8.5 [+ or -] 0.14 (d)

Values represent mean [+ or -] SD from triplicates. Different
small letters in the same row indicate significant difference
(P < 0.05).

TABLE 5: Effect of NaCl and [K.sub.2]HP[O.sub.4] on
thermostability of fungal alkaline protease during 3 h of
incubation at 50[degrees]C.

Time           Control

0                100
30      70.4 [+ or -] 0.91 (c)
60      44.4 [+ or -] 0.48 (d)
120     21.8 [+ or -] 0.58 (d)
180     17.4 [+ or -] 0.38 (d)

                      Residual activity (%)

Time                        NaCl (M)
                 0.5                       1

0                100                      100
30      77.8 [+ or -] 0.71 (b)   80.5 [+ or -] 0.57 (a)
60      54.1 [+ or -] 1.16 (b)   62.0 [+ or -] 0.53 (a)
120     48.8 [+ or -] 0.57 (a)   49.2 [+ or -] 0.25 (a)
180     37.4 [+ or -] 0.30 (a)   37.6 [+ or -] 0.62 (a)

                      Residual activity (%)

Time                [K.sub.2]HP[O.sub.4] (M)
                 0.5                       1

0                100                      100
30      70.1 [+ or -] 1.85 (c)   71.3 [+ or -] 0.80 (c)
60      50.0 [+ or -] 0.71 (c)   57.5 [+ or -] 0.94 (b)
120     36.7 [+ or -] 0.13 (c)   47.1 [+ or -] 0.31 (b)
180     24.9 [+ or -] 0.22 (c)   28.7 [+ or -] 0.14 (b)

Values represent mean [+ or -] SD from triplicates. Different
small letters in the same row indicate significant difference (P
< 0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2014 COPYRIGHT 2010 SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Nirmal, Nilesh P.; Laxman, R. Seeta
Publication:Enzyme Research
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2014
Previous Article:Partial purification and characterization of a heat stable [alpha]-amylase from a thermophilic actinobacteria, streptomyces sp. MSC702.
Next Article:Prolonged laccase production by a cold and pH tolerant strain of Penicillium pinophilum (MCC 1049) isolated from a low temperature environment.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |