Printer Friendly

Emerging technology in diabetes mellitus: glucose monitoring and new insulins. (Review Article).


Modern diabetes management requires intensive self-monitoring of blood glucose levels, often coupled with a multicomponent insulin program. Recent advances include alternate site blood glucose testing devices, which facilitate more frequent sampling by individuals with diabetes. Continuous glucose monitoring through interstitial fluid analysis is now available and appears to give a more representative picture of the glycemic variations typical for type 1 diabetes. Recombinant DNA technology has led to the development of new insulin analogs that provide more physiologic insulin delivery. Inhaled and oral insulin formulations may replace multiple injections in future insulin therapy regimens.


THE Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (1) and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (2) have clearly established the benefit of near-normalization of blood glucose levels to reduce the risk of chronic complications in individuals with diabetes mellitus. An integral part of the treatment program for all affected individuals is self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). (3) This requires lancing the fingertip, applying a blood sample to a test strip, and recording the result from a portable meter. Patients must learn problem-solving skills regarding daily events, and health care professionals must be able to accurately interpret glucose data and provide meaningful feedback in the setting of a brief office visit. Patients complain about the discomfort, inconvenience, and expense of testing. Self-reported data are not necessarily a reliable and accurate representation of the patient's true glycemic pattern. (4,5) However, with the current treatment trends of more flexible diets and complex medication schedules, SMBG is absolutely essential to achieve the ADA standards of glycemic control. (3) For those patients on multicomponent intensive insulin regimens, multiple daily tests both before and after meals are necessary. The quest for noninvasive monitoring and more comprehensive glucose data collection has provided new monitoring technologies to assist the health care professional and the patient. (6) Recombinant DNA technology has facilitated the development of new insulin analogs that provide more physiologic delivery of insulin. These advances will enable more individuals with diabetes to approach optimal glucose control in the future. This discussion will review new glucose monitoring devices, products in development, and the status of new insulin analogs.


Avoiding the pain associated with lancing the fingertips for blood glucose sampling has led to the development of several devices that obtain samples from other less-sensitive areas of the body, hence the term "alternate-site" or "off-site" testing. Examples of these areas include the forearm and thigh. Alternate-site testing is also desirable for individuals in occupations such as health care and certain industrial workers. The first such device available in early 2000 was the AtLast meter (Amira Medical, Scotts Valley, Calif). This device is a single unit that uses a custom lancet to obtain a small blood sample from the desired site. The opposite end of the AtLast holds a test strip that acquires the blood sample for glucose analysis. Clinical studies show an excellent correlation with venous glucose readings. Patients surveyed have indicated a distinct preference for the forearm as a test site. (7)

In mid-2000 the Freestyle meter (TheraSense Inc, Alameda, Calif) became available. This system includes a lancet device that produces a "pin-head" sized blood sample painlessly from the forearm. The blood sample is analyzed by a separate meter unit to provide a glucose result. Figure 1 shows forearm testing with the Freestyle meter, and the inset shows the small blood sample (0.3 [micro]L) obtained with the Freestyle lancet. Lifescan (Milpitas, Calif) has introduced a new FastTake test strip, which has the approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use on alternate sites such as the forearm because of its required small sample size and capillary action. Recently, Lifescan has introduced the ONE TOUCH Ultra, and MediSense (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill) has introduced the Soft-Tact meter for alternate-site testing.

Many patients prefer an alternate site to traditional fingertip testing, but bruising can occur at the site of sampling and there is evidence that rapid changes in glucose levels are more accurately reflected in the fingertip than in the forearm or thigh. Therefore, some manufacturers recommend fingertip testing if rapidly changing glucose levels are suspected.


Current SMBG systems provide only limited data that may not be representative of the glucose excursions typical for the individual with type 1 diabetes. (8) Blood glucose levels change from minute to minute, and frequent insulin injections or an insulin infusion pump are necessary to achieve near-normal glucose 1evels. (9) Hypoglycemia is a major risk, especially in patients who lack awareness and require assistance to recover from such episodes. (10) Intense efforts in recent years have been directed toward developing methods of continuous glucose monitoring to provide a more accurate view of the glycemic changes seen in type I diabetes. Such a system is also a necessary component to make the artificial pancreas a reality. (11) Many of these systems measure interstitial fluid glucose levels that correlate with capillary glucose levels, with minimal differences only when there are abrupt changes in serum glucose levels. (12-14)

In early 2000, MiniMed Inc (Northridge, Calif) gained FDA approval to market the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. (15) The key components are a pager-sized monitor; small implantable sensor, communication station, and computer software for data analysis. Figure 2 shows an implanted sensor and a monitor clipped to a belt. The sensor samples interstitial fluid glucose continuously, usually from the abdominal wall, sending an electrical signal to the monitor every 10 seconds. The monitor converts the signal to a glucose value that is averaged every 5 minutes. As a result, the monitor provides 288 glucose values per 24-hour period. The monitor must be calibrated with a capillary glucose value at least four times a day. The current monitor does not have a visual display of the monitored values. The usual life span of the implanted sensor is 72 hours. The monitored data are downloaded to a computer via the communication station and are then organized for analysis by a software program. Figure 3 provides a dram atic display of the glucose excursions provided by the continuous monitor during a 24-hour period in an individual on an intensive insulin regimen for type 1 diabetes. The top portion of the Figure shows the patient's entered capillary glucose values; the curve in the bottom part of the Figure represents the continuous monitor data. During the period of monitoring, the patient maintains an event diary of meals, activity, and insulin doses, which is critical to data interpretation.

Preliminary reports indicate that most patients benefit from a single session of monitoring with a reduction in hemoglobin [A.sub.1c] levels and hypoglycemic events. (16-18)

Our early experience with the first 12 patients receiving intensive insulin therapy at the University of Kentucky showed patterns of glycemic excursions not previously recognized with usual SMBG in all patients. Previously unrecognized events included unsuspected hypoglycemia requiring a change in basal insulin rates (7 of 12 patients), inappropriate insulin dosing for meals or hyperglycemia (5 of 12 patients), and improper food choices noted on the event diary (3 of 12 patients). The average [HbA.sub.1c] of the patients studied decreased from 8.1% to 7.2% (P < .0017, t test) after implementation of changes based on the continuous monitor data.

Reviewing the glucose data and the event diary is a time consuming, challenging task aided by modal day glucose curves provided by the accompanying computer software program. Limitations include premature sensor failure with loss of data and discordant glucose curves on successive days, making therapeutic recommendations difficult. It is anticipated that improvements in sensor stability and other technical advances, including alarm capacity and visual display for the user, will be available in the near future. Software improvements are also needed to assist the health care professional in data analysis. We are in the process of developing a quantitative data instrument based on an area under the curve analysis that will facilitate data interpretation, and we plan to include that in future analyses.

The Glucowatch Biographer (Cygnus Inc, Redwood City, Calif) has been tested extensively in clinical trials and has recently received FDA approval. (19,20) The device consists of an oversized watch that calculates and displays glucose values and an autosensor that extracts interstitial glucose readings transdermally from the forearm tissues by means of reverse iontophoresis. A low electrical current facilitates the migration of glucose molecules through the skin to the gel disk in the autosensor. The autosensor measures glucose values every 10 minutes for up to 12 hours and gives an immediate visual display as well as storing those values for later analysis. An alarm capability can alert the user to abnormal high or low glucose values. The Glucowatch also requires periodic calibration with capillary glucose values and can give false readings if the user is sweating excessively. The first commercial units have been shipped to the United Kingdom, and it is anticipated that the device will be available in the Uni ted States in mid-2002.


Several laboratories are working intensively to develop noninvasive glucose monitoring using novel technologies such as infrared radiation spectroscopy, Raman (vibrational) spectroscopy, polarized light rotation, and miniaturized systems to harvest interstitial fluid glucose. (6,21) Near-infrared and mid-infrared spectroscopy uses an external light source to measure glucose transcutaneously. Many technical problems must be overcome before such technology can be perfected for clinical use. Numerous companies are developing systems to extract interstitial fluid glucose through minimally invasive methods such as transdermal patches similar to the Glucowatch and microneedles. (22,23) The interstitial fluid extraction devices are being applied in clinical testing, whereas most noninvasive infrared technology requires further refinement. (24-26) The implantable glucose sensor with long-term stability is still in its infancy but is a necessary component to the future artificial pancreas. (27,28)


Basal insulin glargine (Lantus, Aventis Pharmaceuticals) became available in mid-2001. This insulin analog is produced by recombinant DNA technology with 2 changes from the human insulin structure: substitution of glycine for asparagine at position 21 in the A chain and the addition of 2 arginine molecules to the end of the B chain. This chemical change results in a less soluble insulin, which is absorbed slowly from the subcutaneous injection site. The resulting pharmacokinetic properties include an onset within 2 hours, a flat or square wave action profile, and a 24-hour duration of action, making it an ideal basal insulin. (29,30) Absorption of injected glargine did not vary by injection site, leading to less intrasubject variability than with typical intermediate insulins. In clinical trials, patients have had fewer hypoglycemic events and achieved lower fasting glucose levels than those treated with NPH insulin. (31,32) More frequent injection site discomfort has been noted, but this did not lead to disc ontinuance of therapy. Glargine insulin appears to offer great promise as a basal insulin component to an intensive insulin program for type 1 diabetes and may also be a superior insulin for people who need an extra complement of insulin to combine with oral hypoglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes.

Insulin aspart (Novolog, Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals) is a rapid-acting analog produced by substitution of aspartic acid for proline at position B28. This alteration leads to more rapid absorption, with an onset of action within 10 to 20 minutes and peak within 45 minutes, corresponding with the postprandial blood glucose peak. (33) Clinical trials have shown reduced postprandial hyperglycemia with improved hemoglobin [A.sub.1c] levels and no increase in hypoglycemic events when compared with human regular insulin. (34,35) This rapid-acting insulin became available in late 2001.

Many patients find multiple daily insulin injections painful and inconvenient and therefore unacceptable. This has spurred intense efforts to develop alternate systems of insulin delivery. Clinical trials have shown inhaled insulin to be as effective as injected regular insulin in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. (36,37) Pulmonary safety has been shown for up to 2 years. (36) Orally ingested insulin in its native unmodified form is degraded in the upper gastrointestinal tract and shows no metabolic activity. An oral insulin spray (Oralin, Generex Biotechnology) that is absorbed rapidly through the buccal mucosa is currently in clinical trials and may also provide an alternative to injected insulin.

The new insulins will be important components to insulin treatment programs in the near future, improving our ability to simulate endogenous insulin action. The inhaled/oral formulations promise to provide patient acceptable systems that will translate to improved glycemic control for greater numbers of people with diabetes mellitus.



(1.) The Diabetes control and complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986

(2.) UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 1998;352:837-853

(3.) American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2000;23 (suppl 1):S32-s42

(4.) Mazze RS, Shamoon H, Pasmantier R, et al: Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 1984;77:211-217

(5.) Ziegler O, Kolopp M, Got I, et al: Reliability of self-monitoring of blood glucose by CSII-treated patients with type I diabetes. Diabetes Care 1989; 12:184-188

(6.) Marwick C: Development of noninvasive methods to monitor blood glucose levels in people with diabetes. JAMA 1998;280:312-313

(7.) Kruger D, White K, Galpern A: Accuracy of the AtLast Blood Glucose System: clinical correlation evaluations of multiple blood sampling sites. Diabetes 1999; 48:A62

(8.) Bolinder J, Hagstrom-Toft E, Ungerstedt U, et al: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type I diabetic patients: comparison with continuous microdialysis measurements of glucose in subcutaneous adipose tissue during ordinary life conditions. Diabetes Care 1997; 20:64-70

(9.) American Diabetes Association: Implications of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 1993; 42:1555-1558

(10.) American Diabetes Association: Implications of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 2000; 23(suppl 1):s24-s26

(11.) Pfeiffer EF: The glucose sensor: the missing link in diabetes therapy. Horm Metab Res Suppl 1990; 24:154-164

(12.) Bantle J, Thomas W: Glucose monitoring using dermal interstitial fluid. Diabetes 1997; 46:160A

(13.) Boyne M, Silver D, Kaplan J, et al: Timing of changes in interstitial and blood glucose measured with a continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes 2000; 49(suppl 1):398

(14.) Sternberg F, Meyerhoff C, Mennel FJ, et al: Does fall in tissue glucose precede fall in blood glucose? Diabetologia 1996; 39:609-612

(15.) Mastrototaro J: The MiniMed Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS). J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 1999; 12 (suppl 3):751-758

(16.) Bode BW, Gross TM, Thornton KR, et al: Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: a pilot study. [Published erratum appears in Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 47:225.] Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1999; 46:183-190

(17.) Bode BW, Gross TM, Thornton KR, et al: Continuous glucose monitoring facilitates sustainable improvements in glycemic control. Diabetes 2000; 49 (suppl 1):393

(18.) Gibson LC, Halvorson MJ, Carpenter S, et al: Short-term use of the MiniMed Continuous Monitoring System to determine patterns of glycemia in pediatric patients with type 1 DM. Diabetes 2000; 49(suppl 1):438

(19.) Garg S, Potts R, Ackerman N, et al: Correlation of finger-stick blood glucose measurements with Glucowatch Biographer glucose results in young subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22:1708-1713

(20.) Tamada J, Garg S, Jovanovic L, et al: Noninvasive glucose monitoring: comprehensive clinical results. JAMA 1999; 282:1839-1845

(21.) Peterson CM, Chaiken J, Finney W, et al: Non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose using Raman spectroscopy. Diabetes 2000; 49(suppl 1):490

(22.) Meyerhoff C, Mennel FJ, Sternberg F, et al: Current status of the glucose sensor. Endocrinologist 1996; 6:332-339

(23.) Pickup J: Sensitive glucose sensing in diabetes. Lancet 2000; 355:426-427

(24.) Lutgers HL, Hullegie LM, Hoogenberg K, et al: Microdialysis measurement of glucose in subcutaneous adipose tissue up to three weeks in type 1 diabetic patients. Neth J Med 2000; 57:7-12

(25.) Ito N, Saito A, Kayashima S, et al: Transcutaneous blood glucose monitoring system based on an ISFET glucose sensor and studies on diabetic patients. Front Med Biol Eng 1995; 6:269-280

(26.) Heinemann L, Schmelzeisen-Redeker G: Non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring in type I diabetic patients with optical glucose sensors. Non-Invasive Task Force (NITF). Diabetologia 1998; 41:848-854

(27.) Gerritsen M: Problems associated with subcutaneously implanted glucose sensors (Editorial; Comment). Diabetes Care 2000; 23:143-145

(28.) Updike SJ, Shults MC, Gilligan BJ, et al: A subcutaneous glucose sensor with improved longevity, dynamic range, and stability of calibration. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:208-214

(29.) Heinemann L, Linkeschova R, Rave K, et al: Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:644-649

(30.) Lepore M, Pampanelli S, Fanelli C, et al: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and Ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro. Diabetes 2000; 49:2142-2148

(31.) Raskin P, Klaff L, Bergenstal R, et al: A 16-week comparison of the novel insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH human insulin used with insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:1666-1671

(32.) Ratner RE, Hirsch IB, Neifing JL, et al: Less hypoglycemia with insulin glargine in intensive insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes. US Study Group of Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:639-643

(33.) Kaku K, Matsuda M, Urae A, et al: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart, a rapid-acting analog of human insulin, in healthy Japanese volunteers. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 49:119-126

(34.) Raskin P, Guthrie RA, Leiter L, et al: Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:583-588

(35.) Home PD, Lindholm A, Riis A: Insulin aspart vs. human insulin in the management of long-term blood glucose control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. European Insulin Aspart Study Group. Diabet Med 2000; 17:762-770

(36.) Cephalu WT, Landschultz WH, Gelfand RA: Sustained efficacy and pulmonary safety of inhaled insulin during 2 years of outpatient therapy. Diabetes 2000; 49 (suppl 1):406

(37.) Pfutzner AHT, Steiner S, Heinemann L, et al: Inhaled Technosphere/Insulin shows a low variability in metabolic action in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 2000; 49(suppl 1):492


* The quest for noninvasive monitoring and more comprehensive glucose data collection has provided new monitoring technologies to assist the health care professional and the patient.

* Recombinant DNA technology has facilitated the development of new insulin analogs that provide more physiologic delivery of insulin.

* These advances will enable more individuals with diabetes to approach optimal glucose control in the future.

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington.

Reprint requests to L. Raymond Reynolds, MD, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Division of Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, 800 Rose St, MN 525, Lexington, KY 405346-0298.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Southern Medical Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Karounos, Dennis G.
Publication:Southern Medical Journal
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2002
Previous Article:Breastfeeding rates at an urban medical university after initiation of an educational program.
Next Article:Thoracoscopic management of pleural effusions in Kaposi's Sarcoma: a rapid and effective alternative for diagnosis and treatment. (Case Reports).

Related Articles
Cold facts on diabetes.
Importance of Postprandial Glucose Control.
Diabetes Mellitus. (Editorial).
Current Status of Diabetes Treatment. (Featured CME Topic: Diabetes Mellitus).
Selected guidelines. (Featured CME Topic: Diabetes Mellitus).
Improving glycemic control in adults with diabetes mellitus: shared responsibility in primary care practices.
Perioperative glucose control in the diabetic or nondiabetic patient.
Revolutions in the care of diabetes with the help of dogs and lizards.
Physiological and behavioral aspects of glycemic control and hypoglycemia in diabetes.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters