Printer Friendly

Electronic Structure and Magnetic Coupling of Pure and Mg-Doped KCu[F.sub.3].

1. Introduction

Strong correlation of electrons in solids leads to a variety of phenomena that are still very far to be really understood. They range from superconductivity in cuprates, to colossal magnetoresistance in manganites, to heavy fermions formation in rare earth intermetallics. It is widely recognized that one of the reasons for the lack of understanding of these systems is that several degrees of freedom are intimately interconnected and that the identification of the leading interaction is a challenging task, a typical example being the interplay between orbital ordering (OO) and cooperative Jahn-Teller distortion (cJTd). As pointed out by Kugel and Khomskii in their seminal work [1], in presence of strong electron correlation orbitals are subject to exchange interaction and a preexisting OO tends to amplify any lattice instability. In this scenario, OO is the leading interaction that causes the setting up of cJTd. The pseudocubic perovskite KCu[F.sub.3] has always been considered as a model system for testing the Kugel-Khomskii model. However, the argument is still a matter of debate. LDA + DMFT calculations [2], for example, showed that the superexchange mechanisms in KCu[F.sub.3] are not strong enough to stabilize the cJTd up to the high temperature regime where it is experimentally still found to survive. While orbital degrees of freedom are not directly accessible in this system, the resonant X-ray Scattering (RXS) signal is dominated by the distortions in the F- ion positions [3, 4], and melting of cJTd has been observed in perovskite samples of composition K[Cu.sub.1-x][Mg.sub.x][F.sub.3], with T increasing linearly at decreasing x [5, 6]. When extrapolated to x=0, a value of 0.166 eV is found, which can be considered as a reasonable estimate of the cJTd energy in the pure KCu[F.sub.3] compound. This experimental result is in nice agreement with the LDA + DMFT calculations [2] and supports the conclusion that the electron phonon coupling is the most important interaction in stabilizing the peculiar structure of KCu[F.sub.3]. The subtle interplay between spin, orbital, and vibrational degrees of freedom of this material is still the subject of experimental and theoretical investigations [7-18], adopting a variety of techniques ranging from inelastic Raman and X-rays scattering and absorption, [11, 13], neutron scattering [10, 14], DFT based electronic structure computations [8], and lattice dynamics [7, 15] and, more recently, calculations within the variational Green's function formalism [17, 18].

With the aim of better understanding the relevance of these experimental findings and to gather them in the wider context of electronic structure of strongly correlated electron systems, here we present an ab initio study of Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3]. To this purpose, also the electronic and magnetic properties of pure KCu[F.sub.3] are investigated and discussed in comparison with the doped system and with previous calculations. Even for the pure compound, we present an accurate characterization of all the four possible magnetic structures, which has never been previously discussed in detail. However, the main target of our investigation is to characterize the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3] and to determine how Mg doping affects the properties of this material.

The paper is organized as follows: in the next section we present the details of our computations, along with a brief excursion on the atomistic arrangement and the energetic in pure and Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3]. Then we discuss the electronic structure of these materials, using either the typical instruments of solid state physics and the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM), which is based on a direct space analysis of the electron density distribution and provides a description closest to the chemists' point of view. Third, we present the magnetic coupling parameters obtained for the pure and the Mg-doped samples. The last section contains a general discussion about the effect of Mg-doping in KCu[F.sub.3] together with conclusions and perspectives.

2. Computational Details and Structure Optimization

The electronic structure and magnetic coupling of pure and Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3] have been determined by means of first principles periodic computations, as implemented in the CRYSTAL [19] code. For most computations we adopted the unrestricted B3LYP Hamiltonian, which proved to be successful in describing low-dimensional magnetic copper insulators [20]. Several other exchange-correlation functionals have been selected to perform different tests. The electronic wavefunctions have been expanded in terms of all electrons Gaussian basis sets designed for solid state computations. We assigned to potassium atoms a 21s13p3d basis set contracted to 5s4p1d [21], to copper a 21s13p5d set contracted to 6s5p2d [22], to fluorine a 12s5p set contracted to 4s3p [23], and to magnesium a 15s7p1d set contracted to 4s3p1d [24]. To obtain the wavefunctions of four different magnetic phases of KCu[F.sub.3], in each computation we locked properly the atomic spin of copper atoms during the first 30 cycles of the iterative procedure within the CRYSTAL code, and then we let the wavefunction free to evolve towards the converged solution. The four magnetic phases considered in this study are all the possible combinations of ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AF) order among neighbouring Cu atoms pairs in the ab plane and along the c axis (see Figure 1). In particular, in the AF1 phase there is AF order along the c axis and FM order in the ab plane. The AF2 phase presents FM order along the c axis and AF order in the ab plane. In the AF3 and in the F phases the order is entirely AF and FM, respectively.

As a first step, we optimized the structure of the AF1 phase of pure KCu[F.sub.3] within the I4/mcm space group. This corresponds to the optimization of two cell parameters (a=b, c), and of the relative position of fluorine atoms ([x.sub.F]) on the internuclear axis of Cu-Cu neighbours in ab planes. The resulting data are reported in Table 1, and they are in fair agreement with the experimental results, relative errors in the estimate of a and c being about 1-1.5% [25]. The optimized position of F atoms ([x.sub.F]=0.230) confirms that in the AF1 phase copper is surrounded by a distorted octahedron of fluorine atoms. The optimized Cu-F distances in ab planes are 1.93 and 2.26 [Angstrom] and 1.99 [Angstrom] along the c axis.

To compute the wavefunction of the four magnetic phases of pure and Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3], we defined a supercell in the Pmmm space group. The new cell vectors are defined as a'=a+b, b'=a-b, and c'=c, and the arrangement of the atoms within this choice is reported in Figure 1. Our calculations confirm that the AF1 phase is the ground state for pure KCu[F.sub.3]. The AF3 phase, where the FM interactions in ab planes are turned into AF ones, presents a very small increase in energy, with [E.sub.AF3] - [E.sub.AF1]=12 meV/cell. A more marked energy increase is found when the AF interactions along the c axis are turned into FM ones: [E.sub.AF2]-[E.sub.AF1]=229 meV/cell, and [E.sub.F]-[E.sub.AF1]= 234 meV/cell.

Doping of KCu[F.sub.3] with Mg atoms is described as a regular substitution of a single copper atom in each supercell, which corresponds to the overall composition of [KCu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125][F.sub.3]. To account for the geometrical distortions introduced by Mg in the crystal network, we optimized the structure of the AF1 phase of Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3]. We optimized the cell parameters a (=b') and c', as well as the position of the 6 fluorine atoms closer to Mg. Though in principle a much larger set of coordinates should be considered to perform a complete optimization of the structure, we are confident that the perturbation induced in the electronic properties by Mg doping is properly accounted for by considering just the distortion of the first shell of neighbours surrounding the doping site. This assumption is strengthened by the results obtained as discussed in the following, as the perturbation induced by Mg doping is indeed very short-ranged. The geometrical parameters obtained for the AF1 phase have been adopted also for the AF2, AF3, and F magnetic arrangements. Test computations for the AF1 phase, conducted on a larger supercell, proved that no noticeable displacements occur for other atoms than the first fluorine neighbours of Mg.

The doping of KCu[F.sub.3] with a 12.5% percentage of Mg has no relevant effect on the cell parameters, at variance with experimental findings [26]. The dopant element reduces the distortion of the surrounding fluorine octahedron, and the three unique Mg-F distances measures are 1.94 and 2.20 A in ab planes and 1.98 A along c. It should be noted that in our calculations each Mg ion is surrounded by six Cu ions, while in real samples clusters of dopant ions can be formed, and they may affect the cell parameters in a more effective manner. However, the investigation of complex defect structures is beyond the scope of the present paper.

The changes of the Mg-F distances with respect to the corresponding Cu-F ones in the undoped material clearly reflect also on the environment of the neighbouring Cu atoms, and this has the effect of reducing also the distortions of the fluorine octahedra surrounding copper. Noticeably, Mg doping does not alter the ordering in energy of the four magnetic phases considered, but the energy differences become significantly smaller: [E.sub.AF3]-[E.sub.AF1]=4 meV/cell, [E.sub.AF2]- [E.sub.AF1] = 168 meV/cell, and [E.sub.F]-[E.sub.AF1] =184 meV/cell. The steep decrease of the energy difference between the AF1 and the F phases is in agreement with experimental determinations [26].

3. Electronic Structure

A very useful approach to get insight into the chemistry of a given material is represented by the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules. This theory is based on the real space analysis of the electron density distribution, as a way to uniquely define the atomic and bonding properties of a given chemical system. The basic notions of this theory, several applications of the QTAIM to solid state systems, and the formalism adopted by the authors can be found in [27-29]. The QTAIM computations have been carried out using the TOPOND code [30], interfaced with CRYSTAL [19]. Figures 2 and 3 report the electron density, the negative of the Laplacian of the electron density, and the spin density in selected crystallographic planes, while we collected in Table 2 the properties of Cu-F bonds in pure KCu[F.sub.3], along with the Cu-F bonding properties in K[Cu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125][F.sub.3] for the three unique copper atoms closer to Mg (see also Figure 4). We reported just the results obtained for the AF1 phase, because no relevant change in Cu-F bonds occurs when the magnetic ordering of spins changes. Data in Table 2 are typical of interactions between closed shells, confirming that Cu-F bonds are indeed dominated by the large charge transfer from copper to fluorine (assuming the neutral atoms as reference). The value of the electron density at the bond critical point (bcp) is always small. The Laplacian at the bcp is large and positive, and hence it is dominated by its positive eigenvalue [[lambda].sub.3] corresponding to the curvature along the Cu-F internuclear axis. The bcp of Cu-F falls into a region of charge depletion; i.e., the electron density is not accumulated on the Cu-F axis but is removed from it, which is typical of interactions between closed shells. The differences among the Cu-F bonds can be entirely attributed to the different Cu-F internuclear distances: as Cu-F lengthens, [[rho].sub.b], [[nabla].sup.2][[rho].sub.b], and [[lambda].sub.3b] decrease in absolute value. We observed no change in the nature of Cu-F bonds due to the presence of Mg into the lattice, and also in this case the variations of the bonding properties are strictly related to the changes of the internuclear Cu-F distance.

The atomic properties of pure KCu[F.sub.3] according to the QTAIM are collected in Table 3. We first note that the charge of copper atoms deviates significantly from the formal value of +2e, while the charge of potassium is quite close to +1e. Accordingly, the charge of fluorine atoms is far from the formal value of -1e, and its value is -0.76e for F atoms along the c axis and -0.78e for F atoms in ab planes. This indicates that the material is not fully ionic.

The local distribution of electronic density within the atomic basins can be rationalized analyzing its traceless quadrupole moment tensor, Q. The eigenvectors of Q associated with negative (positive) eigenvalues correspond to the directions of charge accumulation (depletion) with respect to an ideal spherical distribution. In pure and Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3] potassium ions are nearly spherical, and the eigenvalues of Q are very small. Conversely, the charge distribution in the atomic basins of copper atoms presents a large anisotropy. The electron density is preferentially accumulated along the long Cu-F bonds at 2.26 [Angstrom], with the corresponding eigenvalue of Q that measures about -1, and it is removed from the directions of the shorter Cu-F bonds at 1.93 and 1.99 [Angstrom], with the eigenvalues of Q that measure +0.36 (Cu-F(c) at 1.99 [Angstrom]) and +0.69 (Cu-F(ab) at 1.93 [Angstrom]). As already observed in the literature [29-31], there is a nice agreement between orbital view and quadrupole moment tensor analysis in systems containing transition metals compounds. Consistently, in our material both approaches predict that the electron density of copper is removed from the axes of the short Cu-F bonds and accumulated along the longest bonds.

Quite interestingly, also the charge distribution of F anions is significantly anisotropic. The positive eigenvalues of Q (+0.97 for F(c), +0.85 for F(ab)) indicate that fluorine atoms remove electron density from the Cu-F bonding direction and accumulate charge away from copper neighbours. As can be seen in Table 3, copper atoms behave similarly in all the magnetic phases considered, and the same is found also for the other atoms of the crystals. The very small variations of the atomic properties observed among the four magnetic phases considered do not follow any recognizable trend.

The insertion of Mg atoms in the structure induces a strong local perturbation. In fact, the QTAIM charge of Mg is about +1.77e, significantly larger as compared to copper, and hence about 0.4e is delivered in the structure. Furthermore, the atomic volume of Mg is 33[bohr.sup.3], much smaller than the value of 61[bohr.sup.3] exhibited by Cu. Finally, the distribution of the electron density in the atomic basin of Mg atoms is almost spherical, with eigenvalues of Q comparable to those of K atoms.

The strong perturbation due to Mg doping is nearly entirely counterbalanced by the six fluorine atoms closer to Mg. The electron population of fluorine atoms increase by 0.10, 0.07, and 0.04e for F neighbours at 1.93, 1.98, and 2.20 [Angstrom], respectively. The atomic volumes increase accordingly: +6[bohr.sup.3] for F atoms at 1.93 and +5[bohr.sup.3] and +4[bohr.sup.3] for F atoms at 1.98 and 2.20 [Angstrom]. It is worth noting that also the distribution of electron density within the atomic basins of F atoms close to Mg becomes less anisotropic: the positive eigenvalue of Q for F neighbours in ab planes decreases from about +0.85 in the pure sample to about +0.55 in the doped compound and from +0.97 to +0.71 for F neighbours along the c axis. No relevant change in the atomic properties of other atoms is observed.

A complementary view to the real space description of the electron density distribution is given by the band structure and the analysis of the Density of States (DOS) obtained by the band structure. First of all, at the B3LYP level of theory our computations correctly predict that the system is an insulator whatever the magnetic phase considered, and Mg doping does not alter significantly the band gap. The system remains nonconducting even imposing an orbitally ordered solution to the undistorted cubic structure. Figure 1 of the SI section confirms that the valence states of pure and Mg-doped distorted KCu[F.sub.3] comes from a partial hybridization between copper and fluorine orbitals, consistently with the picture of the mixed covalent-ionic character of Cu-F bonds, as evidenced above by QTAIM analysis. The contribution of fluorine orbitals to valence states becomes relevant at 2.25 eV below the Fermi level and increases moving to states at even lower energies. The Mg and K atoms act just as electron donors, and their orbitals do not concur to the formation of electronic states in the valence region.

In Figure 5 we reported the DOS projected onto the d orbitals of copper in the pure crystal with AF1 magnetic ordering. To analyze the population of individual orbitals within the copper d shell, we applied a rotation of the reference frame such that the z axis is directed along the longest Cu-F bonds at 2.26 [Angstrom], while x and y are aligned to the shorter Cu-F bonds. For the sake of clarity, the [d.sub.xy], [d.sub.xz], and [d.sub.yz] are grouped together in Figure 5 and labelled "[t.sub.2g]" (black curve) while [mathematical expression not reproducible] (blue curve) and [mathematical expression not reproducible] (red curve) orbitals are drawn separately. Figure SI2 of the SI reports the DOS of individuals "[t.sub.2g]" orbitals. It is easily seen that the d orbitals of copper are completely filled but for the [mathematical expression not reproducible] one, which is empty in just one spin component neglecting a small contribution at about 5 eV below the Fermi level. This is consistent with the QTAIM analysis, in particular with the analysis of Q, indicating that copper distributes its electron density preferentially along the axis of the longest Cu-F bonds, while the axes of the Cu-F intermediate and short bonds are somewhat depleted. Furthermore, this confirms that at this level of theory the system is completely orbitally ordered, consistently with theoretical [2, 20, 32-34] and experimental [35, 36] results for this system. We further note that the DOS coming from [t.sub.2g] orbitals ([d.sub.xy], [d.sub.xz], and [d.sub.yz]) is mainly concentrated in sharp peaks, while the [mathematical expression not reproducible] one is closer to the Fermi level and distributed onto a wider range of energies. This picture does not change when different magnetic orderings are considered, and also the insertion of magnesium as dopant is not able to alter the filling and the ordering of copper orbitals. The only noticeable difference between the pure and doped materials is that the sharp peaks in the DOS of copper atoms become slightly broader (see Figure SI1).

As for the electron population, formally in KCu[F.sub.3] copper should be doubly positively charged and hence exhibit [d.sup.9] population. The Mulliken population analysis on the computed wavefunctions assigns to the d shell of copper a population of about 9.3 electrons in the pure and the Mg-doped crystals, which is consistent with the QTAIM outcome. The orbital population of copper does not depend on the spin ordering within the lattice, as we registered changes of about 0.01e among the different magnetic phases. The insertion of Mg into the crystal lattice and the relaxation of the position of fluorine atoms have no relevant effects onto the population of the d orbitals of copper, suggesting that (i) the perturbation due to Mg doping is extremely localized, (ii) slight modifications of the Jahn-Teller distortion around Cu have little effect on the orbital ordering, and therefore (iii) the Jahn-Teller distortion and the orbital ordering have different energy scales.

The orbital occupation of copper atoms implies that spin polarization around Cu is concentrated along the intermediate and short Cu-F bonds, as can be appreciated in Figure 2 for the AF1 phase. In the doped material no relevant spin polarization is found at the Mg sites, while neighbouring copper atoms remain essentially unchanged (Figure 3, AF1 phase). It is worth noting that a small amount of spin polarization is found also on fluorine atoms, and it depends strictly on the spin of neighbouring Cu atoms. In fact, copper neighbours at 1.93 [Angstrom] in ab planes induce a spin population of about 0.08e on fluorine; the two Cu neighbours at 1.99 [Angstrom] along c induce a polarization of 0.04e each, and the effect due to Cu atoms at 2.26 [Angstrom] is negligible. As a result, in all magnetic phases fluorine atoms in ab planes have a net alfa-beta population of 0.08e, whose sign is the same of the closest copper atom. Conversely, F atoms along c have a zero net alfa-beta population in AF1 and AF3, and twice 0.04e = 0.08e in F and AF2. These simple rules apply also in the Mg-doped crystals, with the remark that no spin polarization comes from Mg atoms, as can be seen in Figure 3. Interestingly, these results are in agreement with LDA+U calculations [4], according to which Cu(3d)-F(2p) hybridization induces a finite spin density on the fluorine ions.

4. Magnetic Coupling

The magnetic coupling in pure and Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3] has been investigated according to the Ising model [37, 38], which is derived from the phenomenological Heisenberg spin Hamiltonian for the isotropic interaction between localized magnetic moments. Its application to solid state systems is based on quite rough approximations, but it is widely used because it gives reliable results and has the advantage of relating the magnetic coupling parameters J to quantities directly available from first principles computations. We refer the interested reader to [20, 39, 40] for a thorough discussion on this subject and applications.

We assumed that in KCu[F.sub.3] the magnetic Hamiltonian contains just two relevant terms, describing the superexchange interaction between first neighbouring Cu pairs in ab planes and along the c axis. The total energy difference between two magnetic phases can then be expressed using the simple formula:

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (1)

where E is the total energy per cell, [J.sub.i] are the magnetic coupling parameters, S is the magnetic moment of Cu atoms (taken as the average between the values in the two phases), [z.sub.i] is the number of first neighbours of a single Cu atom changing spin from one phase to the other, and n is the number of Cu atoms per cell. Considering the magnetic phases referred to as F, AF1, AF2, and AF3, there are four magnetic transitions that allow directly computing [J.sub.ab] and [J.sub.c]:

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (2)

In fact, in the phase transitions F to AF1 and AF2 to AF3 the magnetic coupling between Cu-Cu neighbours in ab planes remains unchanged, while the two neighbours of each copper atom directed along the c axis change spin. The opposite happens for the AF1 to AF3 and the F to AF2 transitions, where the four first neighbours of each Cu atom in ab planes change spin, while the ordering along the c axis is preserved.

When KCu[F.sub.3] is doped with Mg, the copper atoms become in equivalent, and hence the magnetic coupling cannot be described just in terms of the two magnetic parameters [J.sub.ab] and [J.sub.c]. However, as discussed in the previous section, the perturbation induced by Mg on the electronic properties of Cu atoms is extremely localized, and doping does not alter the properties of copper atoms nor the Cu-Cu internuclear distances. We then applied also in K[Cu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125] [F.sub.3] the formulae used for the pure compound. We averaged the magnetic moment S of all Cu atoms within the cell and considered just that the insertion of Mg into the lattice reduces the number of Cu-Cu superexchange interactions as compared to the pure compound. The computed magnetic coupling parameters [J.sub.ab] and [J.sub.c] in KCu0.875 Mg0125 F3 are thus effective values averaged over all the Cu-Cu interactions in the ab planes and along the c axis, respectively. The magnetic coupling parameters computed for pure and Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3] at the B3LYP level of theory for the optimized structure are reported in Table 4.

It is well known that the evaluation of the magnetic coupling depends critically on the functionals adopted in the computation [41], and our computations confirm that a change in the percentage of Hartree-Fock exchange included in the Hamiltonian induces dramatic changes in the evaluation of J terms. Even worse, literature studies prove that no systematic rule allows apriori defining the best functional for a given system. However, as will be discussed in the following, the B3LYP approach proves adequate for the materials under investigation in the present study.

First of all, B3LYP magnetic coupling parameters computed for the pure optimized structure compare well with the experimental data [35, 36, 42-46], and to vary the Hartree-Fock exchange contribution associated with the BECKE/LYP functionals leads to largely inadequate results, which even fail to reproduce the correct order of magnitude of the J terms. Data obtained on KCu[F.sub.3] with these same exchange and correlation functionals but different Hartree-Fock exchange contributions are collected in Tables 1SI and 2SI of the SI section.

We also checked that, at the B3LYP level of theory, the ideal undistorted structure is not an energy minimum, and whatever small perturbation in the cubic lattice induces relaxation to the distorted minimum. An orbitally ordered solution has been obtained also for the undistorted lattice, and its energy is slightly smaller than the nonorbitally ordered one. Test computations conducted with completely different functionals, namely, the PBE and the VBH ones, foresee that orbital ordering is not complete even in the distorted structure (the population of the [mathematical expression not reproducible] orbital decreases) and disappears when an undistorted geometry around copper atoms is applied. At the VBH level of theory the system is conducting not just in the cubic phase but also upon distortion of the lattice.

According to B3LYP results, the antiferromagnetic ordering of Cu spins along the c axis is largely favoured, while the ferromagnetic ordering is preferred in ab planes. Considering the F to AF1 transition or the AF2 to AF3 one gives very similar results for [J.sub.c], and the same happens for [J.sub.ab] determined with the AF1 to AF3 or the AF2 to F phase transition. The computed value for [J.sub.c] measures about -600 K, while the order of magnitude of [J.sub.ab] is +10 K. These data compare very favourably with first principles computations on this same material conducted by Moreira et al. [20], and they are also consistent with the experiments [35, 36, 42-46] conducted on pure KCu[F.sub.3] samples.

Magnetic coupling parameters obtained for the Mg-doped material are very close to the values of the pure compound. The insertion of a single Mg atom on all 8 Cu sites clearly reduces the number of Cu-Cu superexchange interactions, thus decreasing the energy differences between AF1 and F magnetic phases, in agreement with the experiment [26], but their average strength remains nearly unchanged. These findings suggest that a 12.5% Mg doping of KCu[F.sub.3] does not alter the fundamental mechanism and the magnitude of the interactions building up the magnetic ordering of copper spins within the structure. The magnetic coupling between copper atoms (and hence the energy difference between different magnetic phases) is therefore strictly related to their local environment, i.e., to the number of superexchange interactions between neighbouring Cu atoms, regardless of the presence of Mg as doping element. This result is consistent with previous literature data obtained with first principles cluster simulations of the pure compound [47, 48].

5. General Discussion and Conclusions

In this paper we investigated the electronic and magnetic properties of pure KCu[F.sub.3] and of the Mg-doped K[Cu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125][F.sub.3] compound, by means of first principles periodic Density Functional computations. Tests conducted with various functionals indicated that the B3LYP scheme is adequate for these systems.

Optimized structural parameters for the pure compound agree well with experimental data. Conversely, our approach does not reproduce the observed crystal cell variations upon substitution of Cu with Mg atoms. A reason for such discrepancy might be the clustering of Mg atoms in real samples, while in our study they are regularly distributed within the lattice. The structural effect of Mg insertion is just a reduction of the anisotropy of Mg-F distances upon relaxation.

Both in pure and doped compounds, we considered the four possible combinations of ferromagnetic (FM) and anti-ferromagnetic (AF) ordering between Next Nearest Neighbours (NNN) Cu-Cu pairs: the F, AF1, AF2, and AF3 phases. Our calculations correctly predict an insulating AF1 orbitally ordered ground state. Switching the FM interaction in the ab plane into AF has a very limited energy cost, while a marked energy increase is found when the AF interactions along the c axis are turned into FM ones. These energy differences reflect on the estimate of the magnetic coupling parameters [J.sub.ab] and [J.sub.c] computed according to the Ising model (about +10 K and -600 K, respectively) and nicely agree with available experimental results. Doping with Mg has a very limited effect on the estimate of [J.sub.ab] and [J.sub.c]. Overall, the properties of all atoms, with the exception of the six first neighbouring fluorine, seem to be unaffected by Mg insertion, suggesting that doping with Mg induces a strong but extremely localized perturbation. In particular, the bond properties, the absolute charges, and the electronic distribution in the 3d orbitals of Cu ions NNN of Mg are identical to the pure KCu[F.sub.3] compound. It is worth noticing that a complete orbital ordering of the 3d electrons is retained in the doped sample even for Cu(a) ion (see Figure 4), despite the significant elongation of the shortest Cu(a)-F bond from 1.93 to 1.99 [Angstrom]. In other words the OO seems to be quite unaffected by structural distortions. This is in accord with the disentanglement of OO and cJTD foreseen by the model of Kugel and Khomskii [1]. Since Mg doping does not alter significantly the estimate of [J.sub.ab] and [J.sub.c], the energy ordering of the four magnetic phases is maintained, and the lowering of the energy difference between the AF1 and F phases can be explained just considering the reduced number of Cu-F-Cu superexchange interactions in the unit cell.

In agreement with previous literature, either in the pure or in the doped compound, the 3d shell of Cu atoms is only partially filled, and residual spin polarization is found also on fluorine atoms. Copper atoms preferentially accumulate electron density along the two long Cu-F bonds, while they exhibit a depletion along the four shortest Cu-F bonds. The Cu-F interactions are dominated by the charge transfer from the metal to the halogen atom but retain a partially shared character, and hence KCu[F.sub.3] should not be considered a purely ionic material. This is confirmed by the relatively small charge of the Cu ion (+1.38e), which is quite far from the formal value of +2e. Mg delivers a larger amount of electron density towards the neighbouring atoms as compared to Cu, but this is almost entirely counterbalanced by neighbouring F atoms, which explains the moderate changes in the magnetic coupling parameters.

All the above findings converge in suggesting the extreme localization of the perturbation due to Mg doping in the KCu[F.sub.3] system. The absence of long range effects, which should affect the physical properties of the hosting compounds in a more complex way, makes Mg a suitable dopant for the investigation of strongly correlated electronic systems by means of orbital dilution, and this is particularly true in Cu based compounds, due to the very similar ionic radii of [Cu.sup.2+] and [Mg.sup.2+] in octahedral coordination (0.73 and 0.72 A, respectively).

Data Availability

All data relevant to this publication are included in the text and hence are available to everyone.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Davide Ceresoli for useful discussions

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data include total and projected DOS of pure and Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3] (Figure SI), projected density of states on copper atoms of pure KCu[F.sub.3] (Figure SI), and magnetic coupling parameters between Cu pairs determined with different functionals and Hartree-Fock exchange contributions (Tables 1SI and 2SI). (Supplementary Materials)


[1] K. I. Kugel and D. I. Khomskii, "The jahn-teller effect and magnetism: Transition metal compounds," Soviet Physics--Uspekhi, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 621-641, 1982.

[2] E. Pavarini, E. Koch, and A. I. Lichtenstein, " Mechanism for Orbital Ordering in," Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 26, 2008.

[3] L. Paolasini, R. Caciuffo, A. Sollier, P. Ghigna, and M. Altarelli, "Coupling between spin and orbital degrees of freedom in KCuF3," Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1064031-1064034, 2002.

[4] N. Binggeli and M. Altarelli, "Orbital ordering, Jahn-Teller distortion, and resonant x-ray scattering in KCuF3," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1-85117, 2004.

[5] M. Scavini, M. Brunelli, C. Ferrero, C. Mazzoli, and P. Ghigna, "Experimental estimation of the cooperative Jahn-Teller energy in orbitally ordered KCu 0.8Mg 0.2F 3 perovskite," The European Physical Journal B, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 187-190, 2008.

[6] P. Ghigna, M. Scavini, C. Mazzoli, M. Brunelli, C. Laurenti, and C. Ferrero, "Experimental disentangling of orbital and lattice energy scales by inducing cooperative Jahn-Teller melting in K[Cu.sub.1-x] [Mg.sub.x] [F.sub.3] solid solutions," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 81, no. 7, 2010.

[7] I. Leonov, D. Korotin, N. Binggeli, V. I. Anisimov, and D. Vollhardt, "Computation of correlation-induced atomic displacements and structural transformations in paramagnetic KCu[F.sub.3] and LaMnO3," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 81, no. 7, 2010.

[8] C.-Z. Wang, D.-Y. Liu, H.-B. Tang, J. Liu, and L.-J. Zou, "Spin flop transitions under strong magnetic fields in orbital ordered KCuF3," Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 405, no. 5, pp. 1423-1427, 2010.

[9] E. Pavarini, "Lattice distortions in KCuF3: A paradigm shift?" Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), vol. 523, no. 10, pp. 865-866, 2011.

[10] J.-S. Zhou, J. A. Alonso, J. T. Han, M. T. Fernandez-Diaz, J.-G. Cheng, and J. B. Goodenough, "Jahn-Teller distortion in perovskite KCuF3 under high pressure," Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 1117-1121, 2011.

[11] J. C. T. Lee, S. Yuan, S. Lal et al., "Two-stage orbital order and dynamical spin frustration in KCu[F.sub.3]," Nature Physics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63-66, 2012.

[12] V. Gnezdilov, J. Deisenhofer, P. Lemmens et al., "Phononic and magnetic excitations in the quasi-one-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet KCuF 3," Low Temperature Physics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 419-427, 2012.

[13] S. Yuan, M. Kim, J. T. Seeley et al., "Inelastic light scattering measurements of a pressure-induced quantum liquid in KCu[F.sub.3]," Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 21, 2012.

[14] L. G. Marshall, J. Zhou, J. Zhang et al., " Unusual structural evolution in KCuF ," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 87, no. 1, 2013.

[15] D. Legut and U. D. Wdowik, "Vibrational properties and the stability of the KCu[F.sub.3] phases," Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 25, no. 11, 2013.

[16] V.V. Iglamov and M. V. Eremin, "Orbital order fluctuations in KCu[F.sub.3]," Optics and Spectroscopy (English translation of Optika i Spektroskopiya), vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 828-831, 2014.

[17] K. Bieniasz, M. Berciu, M. Daghofer, and A. M. Oles, "Green's function variational approach to orbital polarons in KCuF3," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 94, no. 8, 2016.

[18] K. Bieniasz, M. Berciu, and A. M. Oles, "Orbiton-magnon interplay in the spin-orbital polarons of KCu[F.sub.3] and LaMnO3," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 95, no. 23, 2017.

[19] R. Dovesi, V. R. Saunders, C. Roetti et al., CRYSTAL06 Users Manual, University of Torino, Turin, Italy, 2006.

[20] I. D. P. R. Moreira and R. Dovesi, "Periodic approach to the electronic structure and magnetic coupling in KCuF3, K2CuF4, and Sr2CuO 2Cl2 low-dimensional magnetic systems," International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 805-823, 2004.

[21] R. Dovesi, C. Roetti, C. Freyria-Fava, M. Prencipe, and V. R. Saunders, "On the elastic properties of lithium, sodium and potassium oxide. An ab initio study," Chemical Physics, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 11-19, 1991.

[22] K. Doll and N. M. Harrison, "Chlorine adsorption on the Cu(111) surface," Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 317, no. 3-5, pp. 282-289, 2000.

[23] R. Nada, C. R. A. Catlow, C. Pisani, and R. Orlando, "An abinitio hartree-fock perturbed-cluster study of neutral defects in lif," Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 165-187, 1993.

[24] L. Valenzano, Y. Noel, R. Orlando, C. M. Zicovich-Wilson, M. Ferrero, and R. Dovesi, "Ab initio vibrational spectra and dielectric properties of carbonates: Magnesite, calcite and dolomite," Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 117, no. 5-6, pp. 991-1000, 2007.

[25] R. H. Buttner, E. N. Maslen, and N. Spadaccini, "Structure, electron density and thermal motion of KCu[F.sub.3]," Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 131-138, 1990.

[26] C. Oliva, M. Scavini, S. Cappelli, C. Bottalo, C. Mazzoli, and P. Ghigna, "Melting of orbital ordering in KMgxCu1- xF3 solid solution," The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 111, no. 21, pp. 5976-5983, 2007.

[27] C. Gatti, "Chemical bonding in crystals: new directions," Zeitschrift fur Kristallographie--Crystalline Materials, vol. 220, no. 5/6, pp. 399-457, 2005.

[28] F. Cargnoni and M. Scavini, "Direct-space analysis of the electronic structure of the YBa2Cu3O6 and YBa2Cu3O7 crystals," Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 235-244, 2002.

[29] L. Bertini, F. Cargnoni, and C. Gatti, "Chemical insight into electron density and wave functions: Software developments and applications to crystals, molecular complexes and materials science," Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 117, no. 5-6, pp. 847-884, 2007.

[30] C. Gatti, TOPOND-98 Users Manual, CNR-CSRSRC, Italy, Milan, 1998.

[31] R. Bianchi, C. Gatti, V. Adovasio, and M. Nardelli, "Theoretical and Experimental (113 K) Electron-Density Study of Lithium Bis(tetramethylammonium) Hexanitrocobaltate(III)," Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 471-478, 1996.

[32] A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, "Density-functional theory and strong interactions: orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. R5467-R5470, 1995.

[33] M. D. Towler, R. Dovesi, and V. R. Saunders, "Magnetic interactions and the cooperative Jahn-Teller effect in KCu[F.sub.3]," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 52, no. 14, pp. 10150-10159, 1995.

[34] I. Leonov, N. Binggeli, D. Korotin, V. I. Anisimov, N. Stojic, and D. Vollhardt, "Structural relaxation due to electronic correlations in the paramagnetic insulator KCuF3," Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 9, 2008.

[35] D. A. Tennant, R. A. Cowley, S. E. Nagler, and A. M. Tsvelik, "Measurement of the spin-excitation continuum in one-dimensional KCu[F.sub.3] using neutron scattering," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 52, no. 18, pp. 13368-13380, 1995.

[36] D. A. Tennant, S. E. Nagler, D. Welz, G. Shirane, and K. Yamada, "Effects of coupling between chains on the magnetic excitation spectrum of KCu[F.sub.3]," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 52, no. 18, pp. 13381-13389, 1995.

[37] L. J. De Jongh and A. R. Miedema, "Experiments on simple magnetic model systems," Advances in Physics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-260, 1974.

[38] L. J. De Jongh and R. Block, "On the exchange interactions in some 3d-metal ionic compounds. I. The 180[degrees] superexchange in the 3d-metal fluorides XMF3 and X2MF4 (X=K, Rb, Tl; M=Mn, Co, Ni)," Physica B+C, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 568-593, 1975.

[39] Y.-S. Su, T. A. Kaplan, S. D. Mahanti, and Y.-S. Harrison, "Crystal Hartree-Fock calculations for La2NiO4 and La2CuO4," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol.

59, no. 16, pp. 10521-10529, 1999.

[40] I. de P. R. Moreira and F. Illas, " Ab initio theoretical comparative study of magnetic coupling in ," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 4129-4137, 1997.

[41] N. Wannarit, C. Pakawatchai, I. Mutikainen et al., "Hetero triply-bridged dinuclear copper(ii) compounds with ferromagnetic coupling: A challenge for current density functionals," Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1966-1975, 2013.

[42] S. K. Satija, J. D. Axe, G. Shirane, H. Yoshizawa, and K. Hirakawa, "Neutron scattering study of spin waves in one-dimensional antiferromagnet KCu[F.sub.3]," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2001-2007, 1980.

[43] S. Kadota, I. Yamada, S. Yoneyama, and K. Hirakawa, "Formation of one-dimensional antiferromagnet in KCuF3 with the perovskite structure," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 751-756, 1967.

[44] K. Iio, H. Hyodo, K. Nagata, and I. Yamada, "Study of Magnetic Energy in One-Dimensional S=1/2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet KCuF3 by Optical Birefringence," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1393-1394, 1978.

[45] M. T. Hutchings, E. J. Samuelsen, G. Shirane, and K. Hirakawa, "Neutron-diffraction determination of the antiferromagnetic structure of KCu[F.sub.3]," Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 919-923, 1969.

[46] S. E. Nagler, D. A. Tennant, R. A. Cowley, T. G. Perring, and S. K. Satija, "Spin dynamics in the quantum antiferromagnetic chain compound KCuF3," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 12361-12368, 1991.

[47] I. D. P. R. Moreira, F. Illas, and D. Maynau, "Local character of magnetic coupling in ionic solids," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. R6593-R6596, 1999.

[48] I. D. P. R. Moreira and F. Illas, "Ab initio study of magnetic interactions in KCu[F.sub.3] and K2CuF4 low-dimensional systems," Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 5179-5185, 1999.

Fausto Cargnoni, (1) Simone Cenedese, (1) Paolo Ghigna (iD), (2) Mario Italo Trioni, (1) and Marco Scavini (iD) (1,3)

(1) Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Molecolari, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy

(2) Dipartimento di Chimica, Universita di Pavia and Unita INSTM di Pavia, Viale Taramelli 13, 27100 Pavia, Italy

(3) Dipartimento di Chimica, Universita degli Studi di Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Marco Scavini;

Received 23 January 2018; Revised 18 June 2018; Accepted 3 July 2018; Published 15 August 2018

Academic Editor: Da-Ren Hang

Caption: Figure 1: Stick-and-ball representation of KCu[F.sub.3] in the Pmmm space group (see text for details). For the sake of clarity, only half a cell is shown in the figure (0[less than or equal to]y[less than or equal to]0.5). The shifts of the position of F ions in the ab plane, in respect to the middle of the Cu-Cu internuclear axis as in cubic perovskite, are enlarged to highlight the deformation of CuF6 octahedra. The partially filled [d.sub.x2-y2] orbitals responsible for orbital ordering are schematically represented in red.

Caption: Figure 2: Contour plots of the electron density, the Laplacian of the electron density changed in sign and spin density in pure KCu[F.sub.3]. Left panels refer to the ab and the right panels to the ac plane. Full and dashed lines indicate positive and negative values of the plotted function, respectively. Plots refer to the AF1 phase.

Caption: Figure 3: Contour plots of the electron density, the Laplacian of the electron density changed in sign and spin density in Mg-doped KCu[F.sub.3]. Left panels refer to the ab and the right panels to the ac plane. Full and dashed lines indicate positive and negative values of the plotted function, respectively. Plots refer to the AF1 phase.

Caption: Figure 4: Stick-and-ball representation of the atoms surrounding Mg in the doped compound. Mg is 2.20 and 1.94 [Angstrom] from fluorine atoms shared with Cu(a) and Cu(b), respectively.

Caption: Figure 5: Projected density of states on copper atoms of pure KCu[F.sub.3] determined at the B3LYP level of theory for the AF1 phase. DOS in arbitrary units. Upper and bottom panels refer to different spin components. For the sake of clarity, [d.sub.xy], [d.sub.xz], and [d.sub.yz] are grouped together and called "[t.sub.2g]" (black curve) while [mathematical expression not reproducible] (blue curve) and [mathematical expression not reproducible] (red curve) ones are drawn separately
Table 1: Crystallographic parameters of pure KCuF3 in the AF1
magnetic phase (I4/mcm space group).

Reference         a, b ([Angstrom])    c ([Angstrom])   [x.sub.F]

this work                5.92               7.96          0.230
Experiment [25]       5.8569(6)          7.8487(8)      0.2276(1)

Table 2: Cu-F bonding properties in the AF1 phase of pure and
Mg-doped Kcu[F.sub.3].

                                                 [[rho].sub.] x
System                 bond       distance (a)   [10.sup.2 b,c]

Kcu[F.sub.3]       Cu-F (ab)          1.93            7.8
                   Cu-F (ab)          2.26            3.7
                   Cu-F (c)           1.99            6.5
K[Cu.sub.0.875]    Cu(a)-F (ab)       1.99            6.7
  [Mg.sub.0.125]   Cu(a)-F (ab)       2.26            3.7
  [F.sub.3]        Cu(a)-F (c)        1.99            6.5
                   Cu(b)-F (ab)       1.93            7.7
                   Cu(b)-F (ab)       2.25            3.8
                   Cu(b)-F (c)        1.99            6.5
                   Cu(c)-F (ab)       1.93            7.8
                   Cu(c)-F (ab)       2.26            3.7
                   Cu(c)-F (c)        2.00            6.4

System                 bond             x [10.sup.2 b,d]

Kcu[F.sub.3]       Cu-F (ab)                   51
                   Cu-F (ab)                   15
                   Cu-F (c)                    41
K[Cu.sub.0.875]    Cu(a)-F (ab)                41
  [Mg.sub.0.125]   Cu(a)-F (ab)                15
  [F.sub.3]        Cu(a)-F (c)                 40
                   Cu(b)-F (ab)                51
                   Cu(b)-F (ab)                16
                   Cu(b)-F (c)                 41
                   Cu(c)-F (ab)                51
                   Cu(c)-F (ab)                15
                   Cu(c)-F (c)                 40

                                  [[lambda].sub.3 b]
System                 bond        x [10.sup.2 b,e]

Kcu[F.sub.3]       Cu-F (ab)              71
                   Cu-F (ab)              23
                   Cu-F (c)               58
K[Cu.sub.0.875]    Cu(a)-F (ab)           58
  [Mg.sub.0.125]   Cu(a)-F (ab)           23
  [F.sub.3]        Cu(a)-F (c)            57
                   Cu(b)-F (ab)           71
                   Cu(b)-F (ab)           24
                   Cu(b)-F (c)            58
                   Cu(c)-F (ab)           71
                   Cu(c)-F (ab)           23
                   Cu(c)-F (c)            56

(a) Values in [Angstrom]; (b) the subscript b indicates that the
properties are evaluated at the bond critical point; (c) [rho] is the
electron density; (d) [[nabla].sup.2] [rho] is the Laplacian of the
electron density; (e) [[lambda].sub.3] is the positive eigenvalue of
the Hessian of the electron density.

Table 3: Atomic properties in pure KCu[F.sub.3] computed with the
QTAIM approach.

System     Atom      q (a)      V (b)      Q (c)

AF1         K         0.93       124        -0.02
            Cu        1.38        61        -1.05
           F(c)      -0.76        93        -0.49
          F (ab)     -0.78        96        -0.44
AF2         Cu        1.39        61        -1.00
AF3         Cu        1.39        61        -1.06
F           Cu        1.39        61        -1.02

(a) Atomic charge (electrons); (b) atomic volume ([bohr.sup.3]);
(c) eigenvalues of the traceless quadrupole moment tensor (a.u.);
positive (negative) values indicate that the electron density is
preferentially removed (accumulated) along the direction of the
corresponding eigenvector. The first eigenvalue for Cu
atoms corresponds to the direction of the longest Cu-F bonds.

Table 4: Magnetic coupling parameters between Cu pairs in ab
planes ([J.sub.ab]) and along the c axis ([J.sub.c]).

                                                      Jab    Jc
Material                                 Transition   (K)   (K)

KCu[F.sub.3]                               F-AF1            -631
KCu[F.sub.3]                              AF2-AF3           -620
KCu[F.sub.3]                              AF1-AF3     17
KCu[F.sub.3]                               F-AF2       7
K[Cu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125][F.sub.3]     F-AF1            -655
K[Cu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125][F.sub.3]    AF2-AF3           -611
K[Cu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125][F.sub.3]    AF1-AF3      8
K[Cu.sub.0.875][Mg.sub.0.125][F.sub.3]     F-AF2      28
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Cargnoni, Fausto; Cenedese, Simone; Ghigna, Paolo; Trioni, Mario Italo; Scavini, Marco
Publication:Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Previous Article:Optical Modeling Analysis of Red, Green, and Yellow Phosphors with a Blue LED.
Next Article:Angle-Scanning Surface Plasmon Resonance System with 3D Printed Components for Biorecognition Investigation.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters