Printer Friendly

Efficacy of four molluscicides against the giant African snail, Lissachatina fulica (Gastropoda: pulmonata: achitinidae).

The control of the giant African snail (GAS), Lissachatina fulica Bowdich (Gastropoda: Achatinidae) has been the subject of much debate for decades. GAS is a notorious generalist that consumes over 500 plant species and ranks consistently among the world's most invasive pests (Lowe et al. 2000). This species has been intercepted or introduced all over the world, and aggressive tactics have been implemented to mitigate the risk of dispersal via trade routes through international quarantines and surveillance protocols (USDA-APHIS 2007). Additionally, GAS serves as a vector in the transmission of several vertebrate parasites (Civeyrel & Simberloff 1996; Thiengo et al. 2007).

In Sep 2011, an established population of L. fulica was discovered in Miami, Florida. This population was discovered in an urban neighborhood with moderately sized homes on relatively small lots (< 0.5 acres). An abundant supply of host material was available to the snails in this area consisting of ornamental plants, subtropical fruit trees and an abundant supply of detritus. This part of Florida is known for its high rainfall, mild winters and high humidity making it an ideal habitat for GAS establishment. Within days of this first find, an eradication program was initiated by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services in conjunction with the United States Department of Agriculture. Small populations of this pest have been eradicated in Australia (Colman 1977) and once before in Florida in 1975 (Poucher 1975; Mead 1979; Simberloff 2003). Successful eradication efforts rely heavily on molluscicides (Simberloff 2003) particularly metaldehyde and carbamate formulations, supplemented with mechanical collection.

Use of metaldehyde as a molluscicide was developed in the late 1930s and carbamate in the 1950s. Molluscicides formulated with varying proportions of these compounds have been highly efficacious over the years (Kemp & Newell 1985; Sparks et al. 1996; Ebenso et al. 2005). However, concerns have been raised regarding the negative environmental impacts of those formulations, particularly non-target effects on vertebrates (USDA-APHIS 2007). Additionally, molluscicides are typically formulated with bran to increase palatability and act as an attractant for slugs and snails (Howlett et al. 2008). Unfortunately, these bait formulations may be highly attractive to domesticated animals (e.g., dogs). Several alternative compounds have been developed and incorporated in molluscicide formulations. These include calcium arsenate, calcium cyanamid, and DDT, all highly toxic and of limited use or no longer available. Other products are formulated with iron sulphate, boric acid and iron phosphate, which are considered less toxic and often promoted as more environmentally "friendly."

The current GAS eradication program in South Florida is concentrated in a densely populated urban area. This poses unique challenges as it may be necessary to exclude or limit the use of several restricted use molluscicides with proven efficacy due to potential non-target impacts. It is, therefore, prudent to evaluate the efficacy of less toxic alternative molluscicides relative to the known efficacy of metaldehyde-carbamate formulations. The purpose of this experiment was to explore the efficacy of several safer alternative molluscicides. It was hypothesized that at least one of the safer alternatives would have effects comparable to that of a metaldehyde-carbamate-based product. Therefore, the effect of each molluscicide on the mortality, mobility and food consumption of GAS was tested.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used choice and no-choice tests to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the metaldehyde/carbamate molluscicide Ortho Bug-Geta Plus, relative to 3 alternatives Sluggo (a.i. = iron phosphate), Niban (a.i. = orthoboric acid) and Ferroxx (a.i. = sodium ferric EDTA) to induce mortality in GAS.

Molluscicide trials were conducted in the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services' Florida Biological Control Laboratory (FBCL) quarantine facility, at the Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida. Approximately 1,500 GAS were hand-collected from Miami-Dade County, Florida and established in quarantine. The snails were provided organic romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.; Asterales: Asteraceae) as the main food source along with cuttlebone as a source of calcium. The snails were organized into 3 classes, based on their developmental stage: neonates (7 to 20 mm), juveniles (20-45 mm) and adults (45-110 mm) (Ciomperlik et al. 2013). Only snails close to the median measurement for each respective size class were used in the experiment. This was done in an effort to minimize the possibility of snails developing into a new size class during the experiment.

A treatment consisted of 10 snails (one snail per container) of each life stage being exposed to a molluscicide along with 10 snails of each same life stage with no molluscicide acting as a control (Fig. 1). Four molluscicides were tested, resulting in 4 replications using 150 snails in each replication (Table 1). Consequently, 1,200 GAS were used in choice and no-choice tests.

The entire experiment was divided into 2 test types: choice and no-choice. In the no-choice tests, only bait and water were provided in the first 48 h. After the initial 48 h, food was provided to prevent starvation from obscuring the results. In the choice tests, bait and food were provided from beginning to end. Each vented container (18 x 28 x 10 cm) was supplied with water via moistened braided cotton wicks in a Petri dish (Fig. 1). After the first 48 h, lettuce was replaced every other day or as needed.

Initial doses of the molluscicide baits were provided at the maximum labeled rates based on the surface area of the testing arena for each individual unit. Subsequent applications were made every 4 days so that bait was always available to the snails (Table 2). The bait was replaced sooner if fully consumed, mildewed or fouled by the snail.

Mortality, mobility and consumption (feeding or not feeding) were documented daily for 15 days. A snail was considered to be immobile if it was completely withdrawn into its shell. Snails that were unresponsive to vigorous, mechanical stimulation (probing) were considered dead.

Percent mortality was analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) of percent dead at the end of 15 days by treatment type, with multiple mean comparison via Tukey-Kramer's (HSD) test ([alpha] = 0.05).

RESULTS

The provision of a food source as an option within the first 48 hours of the experiment proved to significantly influence molluscicide-induced mortality in the snails. Without a food source in the first 48 hrs, both Ferroxx and Niban demonstrated a much greater mortality when compared to their performance in the choice test. In the no-choice test, Niban caused the highest mortality and was not statistically different from the Ortho Bug-Geta Plus (74.2% and 71.7% mortality, respectively); Ferroxx caused 50.8% mortality, which was also not statistically different from Ortho Bug-Geta Plus (Table 3).

In the choice test, however, Ortho Bug-Geta Plus caused the greatest mortality (69.2%), followed by Sluggo and Niban with 49.2% and 48.3%, respectively. Ferroxx did not perform well, causing only 35.8% mortality. There was less than 3% average mortality in the controls for both choice and no-choice tests, and all treatments were different from the control (Table 3).

In choice and no-choice tests, adults and neonates exhibited greater susceptibility to the molluscicides compared to juveniles (Figs. 2 and 3). For all 4 molluscicides, the juveniles averaged 32.5% mortality in the choice tests, compared to 60.6% in adults and 58.8% in neonates (F = 5.90, df = 2, 45, P = 0.0053). Similar results were observed in the no-choice experiment where juveniles averaged 45.6% mortality compared to 76.3% in adults and 70.0% in neonates (F = 7.55, df = 2, 45, P = 0.0015).

The amount of time required to induce snail mortality varied over time with each molluscicide, in both the choice and no-choice tests. The percent mortality from OrthoBug-Geta Plus grad ually increased over time. In Sluggo and Ferroxx, the mortality peaked very early, often within the first 2 to 5 days; however, Niban-induced mortality peaked later in the study (approximately 10 days after the initial contact with the product) (Figs. 2 and 3).

DISCUSSION

Results from this study clearly demonstrated that while select alternatives to metaldehyde/ carbamate-based molluscicides can elicit mortality in populations of GAS they simply are not as effective as traditional metaldehyde based products. It was determined that the results of the choice tests were more instructive as GAS are unlikely to encounter molluscicides in a no-choice scenario under field conditions. This decision was reinforced by the high mortality induced by Niban in the no-choice tests (74.2%) compared to its relatively poor performance in the choice tests (48.3% mortality).

Results from the choice tests demonstrate that the metaldehyde/carbamate formulation (OrthoBug-Geta Plus) induced the highest percent mortality (69.2%) of all the molluscicides evaluated. This would suggest that metaldehyde/carbamate formulations remain one of the most useful tools for chemical control of pest molluscs outside of environmentally sensitive areas. Sluggo and Niban both had a lower percent mortality by comparison at approximately 49% and 48%, respectively; however, these molluscicides may be suitable candidates for inclusion in circumstances that preclude the use of more efficacious, but potentially toxic molluscicides.

The molluscicides Niban, Sluggo and Ferroxx are formulated with active ingredients (orthoboric acid, iron phosphate and sodium ferric EDTA, respectively), which initially act as antifeedants, then alter specific vital biochemical pathways necessary for proper functioning of organ systems (Iglesias & Speiser 2001; Speiser & Kistler 2002; David Moore, personal communication 2011). This disruption eventually results in death. While the maximum efficacy of Ferroxx and Sluggo was achieved within the 15 day experimental period it is probable that additional mortality may have been observed beyond this period with Niban and Ortho Bug-Geta Plus.

It was observed that in all treatments, a majority of the treated snails that died would cease eating and moving, and became moribund prior to expiring. This behavior was particularly evident in snails treated with Niban. Cochran (1995) reported that boric acid destroyed the foregut cells of treated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) and caused excessive bloating that inhibited feeding and led to delayed mortality. In this study, mortality of Niban-treated GAS peaked approximately 10 days after initial exposure suggesting starvation as the eventual cause of death. OrthoBugGeta Plus showed similar results with a peak mortality from 7 to 10 days. In contrast, most of the snail mortality occurred within the first 2 to 5 days when treated with Ferroxx and Sluggo.

In this study, adult snails and neonates exhibited greater susceptibility to all molluscicide treatments compared to juveniles. Bailey (2002) also noted age-determined differential susceptibility of gastropods to different molluscicides. Godan (1983) reported similar results when limacid species were provided with Isolan (carbamate-based bait), and Frain & Newell (1982) reported the same for Deroceras reticulatum, where the juveniles were less likely to consume the molluscicide baits and were less susceptible than the hatchlings and the reproductive adults.

It remains unclear why juveniles are such difficult molluscicide targets, but it is possible that juveniles are at a dispersal stage and invest more resources into wandering, so ingestible baits are not as attractive. It has also been noted that GAS food preferences change during the lifetime of the snail. Neonates seem to be detritivores switching to a more herbivorous diet in the juvenile stage and then reverting to a more mixed diet as adults utilizing both detritus and living plant matter (Ciomperlik et al. 2013). Therefore, it is possible that the attractant used in most snail baits may not be as attractive to the more herbivorous juveniles. Further testing should be carried out to determine the type of products that could target juvenile terrestrial gastropods. This information would aid in the development of more effective molluscicide baits and eradication programs.

It was evident that all the molluscicides evaluated induced mortality to varying degrees; however, the most efficacious product was the metaldehyde-carbamate-based product (OrthoBug-Geta Plus). Sluggo and Niban baits produced moderate results and are safer alternatives to OrthoBugGeta Plus in sensitive areas. More field testing of each of these products is needed, applied exclusively or in rotation, along with stronger molluscicides that may be applied in a more focused manner even in sensitive areas. As is the case in Florida's eradication program an integrated approach to controlling and eradicating this pest must be utilized. This may include the establishment of quarantine zones to limit the movement of plant material out of the affected area, debris removal in urban landscapes, mechanical collection of snails and trapping, in addition to chemical treatments.

Caption: Fig. 1. Layout of molluscicide efficacy choice and no-choice tests: A) Choice test with juvenile snail, B) No- choice test with live adult snail and C) No-choice test with dead adult snail 24 hrs after the initiation of the experiment.

Caption: Fig. 2. Choice Test: Mortality of Lissachatina fulica treated with molluscicides over 15 days. (Square = Adults, Circle = Juveniles, X = Neonates). Overall mean of means calculated for N=10 snails per life stage in each of 4 replicates.

Caption: Fig. 3. No-Choice Test: Mortality of Lissachatina fulica treated with molluscicides over 15 days. (Square = Adults, Circle = Juveniles, X = Neonates). Overall mean of means calculated for N = 10 snails per life stage in each of 4 replicates.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to Paul Skelley and Wayne Dixon for reviews of the manuscript. We would also like to thank Jose Diaz, Lindley Clark and Steven Rowley for assistance with data collection, experimental design and statistical analysis. This article reports the results of research only. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the FDACS. This research was approved by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry for publication as contribution # 1218.

REFERENCES CITED

BAILEY, S. E. R. 2002. Molluscicidal baits for control of terrestrial gastropods, pp 33-54 In G.

M. BARKER [ED.], MOLLUSCS AS CROP PESTS. CABI PUBLISHING, WALLINGFORD, UK.

CIOMPERLIK, M. A., D. G. ROBINSON, I. H. GIBBS, A. FIELDS, T. STEVENS, AND B. M. TAYLOR. 2013. Mortality to the giant African snail. Lissachatina fulica Bowdich (Achatinidae), and non-target snails using select molluscicides. Fl. Entomol. (in press).

CIVEYREL, L., AND SIMBERLOFF, D. 1996. A tale of two snails: is the cure worse than the disease? Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 1231-1252.

COCHRAN, D. G. 1995. Toxic effects of boric acid on the German cockroach. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 51: 561-563.

COLMAN, P. H. 1977. An introduction of Achatina fulica to Australia. Malacol. Rev. 10: 77-78.

EBENSO, I. E., ITA, B., UMOREN, E. P., ITA, M., BINANG, W., EDET, G., IZAH, M., UDO, I. O., IBANGA, G., AND UKPONG, E. E. 2005. Effects of carbamate molluscicides on African giant land snail Limicolaria aurora. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Mgt. 9: 99-102.

FRAIN, M. J., AND NEWELL, P. F. 1982. Meal size and a feeding assay for Deroceras reticulatum (Mull.). J. Molluscan Studies 48: 98-99.

GODAN, D. 1983. Pest slugs and snails: Biology and Control. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 445 pp.

HOWLETT, S. A., WILSON, D. J., AND MILLER, K. T. 2008. The efficacy of various bait products against the grey field slug, Deroceras reticulatum. New Zealand Plant Prot. 61: 283-286.

IGLESIAS, J., AND SPEISER, B. 2001. Consumption rate and susceptibility to parasitic nematodes and chemical molluscicides of the pest slugs Arion hortensis s. s. and A. distinctus. J. Pest Sci. 74: 159-166.

KEMP, N. J., AND NEWELL, P. F. 1985. Laboratory observations on the effectiveness of methiocarb and metaldehyde baits against the slug Deroceras reticulatum (Milll). J. Molluscan Studies 51: 228-229.

LOWE, S., BROWNE, M., BOUDJELAS, S., AND DE POORTE, M. 2000. 100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species. A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Published by The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), 12 pp. First published as special lift-out in Aliens 12, Dec 2000. Updated and reprinted version: Nov 2004. www.issg.org/booklet.pdf.

MEAD, A. R. 1979. Economic malacology with particular reference to Achatina fulica. In: V. Fretter and J. Peake [eds.] Pulmonates, Vol. 2B. Academic Press, London, 150 pp.

POUCHER, C. 1975. Eradication of the Giant African Snail in Florida. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 88: 523-524. Simberloff, D. 2003. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conserv. Biol. 17: 83-92.

SPARKS, S. E., QUISTAD, G. B., COLE, L. M., AND CASIDA, J. E. 1996. Metaldehyde molluscicide action in mice: distribution, metabolism, and possible relation to GABAergic system. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol. 55: 226-236.

SPEISER, B., AND KISTLER, C. 2002. Field tests with a molluscicide containing iron phosphate. Crop Prot. 21: 389-394.

THIENGO, S. C., FARACO, F. A., SALGADO, N. C., COWIE, R. H., AND FERNANDEZ, M. A. 2007. Rapid spread of an invasive snail in South America: the giant African snail, Achatina fulica, in Brazil. Biol. Invasions 9: 693-702.

USDA-APHIS. 2007. New Pest Response Guidelines. Giant African Snails: Snail Pests in the Family Achatinidae. USDA-APHIS-PPQ-Emergency and Domestic Programs-Emergency Planning, Riverdale, Maryland. Accessed 7/31/2012--http://www.aphis. usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/emergency/ downloads/nprg_gas.pdf.v

TREVOR RANDALL SMITH (1) *, JODI WHITE-MCLEAN (1), KATRINA DICKENS (1), AMY C. HOWE (1) AND ABBIE FOX (1)

(1) Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

* Corresponding author; E-mail: Trevor.Smith@freshfromflorida.com

TABLE 1. NUMBER OF LISSACHATINA FULICA PER LIFE STAGE
USED IN EACH OF 4 REPLICATIONS.

Treatment                    Life Stage

                      Neonate   Juvenile   Adult

Sluggo                  10         10       10
Niban                   10         10       10
Ortho Bug-Geta Plus     10         10       10
Ferroxx                 10         10       10
Control                 10         10       10
Total                   50         50       50

TABLE 2. COMMERCIAL PRODUCT NAME, FORMULATION, ACTIVE
INGREDIENT DOSE AND APPLICATION RATE OF MOLLUSCICIDES
EVALUATED IN THE LABORATORY.

Commercial Product    Formulation   Active Ingredient

Ortho Bug-Geta Plus   Granule       Carbaryl (5%) and
                                      Metaldehyde (2%)
Niban                 Granule       Orthoboric acid (5%)

Sluggo                Granule       Iron phosphate (1%)

Ferroxx               Granule       Sodium Ferric EDTA (5%)

Commercial Product    Application Rate

Ortho Bug-Geta Plus   1 lb/2000 sq. ft
                        (453.6 g/185.6 [m.sup.2])
Niban                 6 oz/100 sq. ft
                        (170.1 g/9.29 [m.sup.2])
Sluggo                1 lb/1000 sq. ft
                        (453.5 g/92.9 [m.sup.2])
Ferroxx               0.44 lb/1000 sq. ft
                        (200 g/92.9 [m.sup.2])

TABLE 3. MEAN PERCENT MORTALITY OF ALL 3 LIFE STAGES OF
LISSACHATINA FULICA TREATED WITH 4 MOLLUSCICIDES, INITIALLY
AT LABELED RATES THEN SUBSEQUENTLY AT V4 THE RATE, IN CHOICE
AND NO-CHOICE TESTS EVALUATED AT THE END OF 15 DAYS.

Product               Mortality (%) after 15 days
                      (Mean [+ or -] S.E.) *

                          Choice Test          No-Choice Test

Ortho Bug-Geta Plus   69.2 [+ or -] 5.5 a    71.7 [+ or -] 8.7 a
Niban                 48.3 [+ or -] 8.7 ab   74.2 [+ or -] 8.3 a
Sluggo                49.2 [+ or -] 9.5 ab   59.2[+ or -] 5.8 a
Ferroxx               35.8 [+ or -] 5.5 b    50.8 [+ or -] 5.3 a
Control                2.5 [+ or -] 1.6 c    2.5 [+ or -] 1.6 b

* Means within a column with different letters are significantly
different according to Tukey-Kramer' (HSD) Comparison test.
Overall mean of means calculated for N = 30 snails in each of
4 replicates. Choice [F.sub.4,15] = 13.297, P < 0.0001;
No-Choice [F.sub.4,15] = 20.191, P < 0.00001.


----------

Please note: Some tables or figures were omitted from this article.
COPYRIGHT 2013 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Smith, Trevor Randall; White-Mclean, Jodi; Dickens, Katrina; Howe, Amy C.; Fox, Abbie
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2013
Words:3194
Previous Article:Superparasitism of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) by Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).
Next Article:Effects of rose cultivars and fertilization rates on populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in southern Florida.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters