Printer Friendly

Effects of tourniquet technique, order of draw, and sample storage on plasma fibrinogen.

The use of plasma fibrinogen concentrations to predict clinical ischemic events in subjects with and without prior evidence of atherosclerosis [1-14] has led to recommendations to incorporate fibrinogen into the cardiovascular risk profile [15]. Such use of plasma fibrinogen requires careful attention to potential sources of variability, as only small (5%) absolute differences in fibrinogen distinguish subjects who develop cardiovascular disease from those subjects who do not [16].

Variability in fibrinogen results apart from intraindividual differences is difficult to quantify, because the few groups who have examined these issues used different assays for fibrinogen determination. Moreover, the functional assay for fibrinogen is highly influenced by technician expertise and manipulation [17]. Previously, we examined within-run analytical CV, within-person, within-day biological variation, and a 6-week within-person biological variation with the Clauss method for fibrinogen determination [16].

We describe here selected effects of sample collection and storage on fibrinogen results and we propose guidelines for sample collection and storage.

Blood was collected in evacuated tubes (5-mL capacity) containing 0.5 mL of 0.129 mol/L (3.8%) buffered citrate solution (Becton Dickinson). Fibrinogen concentrations were determined by thrombin clottable time with the Clauss method (Dade Data-Fi, Baxter Diagnostics) [18] with bovine thrombin (100 kU/L) and 2.8 x [10.sup.-2] mol/L sodium barbital in 0.125 mol/L sodium chloride. Duplicate plasma samples were diluted 1:10 (by vol) with an imidazole buffer (Organon Teknika) and measured at 20- and 40-s intervals at 37[degrees]C in a fibrometer (Model BBL, Becton Dickinson).

All samples were acquired from healthy, nonsmoking volunteers who were seated [greater than or equal to]5 min before phlebotomy [19]. Volunteers were excluded if they had current illnesses, regular and recent use of medications during the preceding 3 months, or an acute-phase illness in the preceding 2 months [20].

The impact of tourniquet pressure and duration was evaluated in a cross-over study design on 38 subjects. The tourniquet pressure was standardized with a sphygmomanometer and a C-clamp that was applied to the tubing to maintain the specified pressure. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated from three blood pressure recordings obtained at 1-min intervals from seated volunteers. Low pressure was defined as 40 mmHg tourniquet pressure. High pressure was calculated as the MAP + 10 mmHg (MAP + 10) for each subject. Fibrinogen samples were procured at three intervals of equal duration: 0-1 min, 2-3 min, and 4-5 min. For each interval, three replicate samples were acquired at each interval, and the mean value is reported.

On the basis of the findings of the tourniquet pressure and duration study, 14 consecutive blood samples were acquired from each of 38 subjects at low pressure within 1 min. All but the first acquired sample (which was discarded) were centrifuged to obtain plasma specimens. The first four plasma samples were delivered to the Coagulation Laboratory for analysis within 10 min. The remaining nine plasma samples were refrigerated at 4[degrees]C. Three sets of plasma samples were delivered to the Coagulation Laboratory at 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h.

All statistical analyses were performed with SAS statistical package (ver. 6.10) [21], except for the Friedman test performed with SPSS for Windows [22]. Results are expressed as mean [+ or -] SD. The first-stick phenomenon was evaluated with a two-tailed paired t-test. The Friedman test was used to examine the influence of the duration of the tourniquet application on fibrinogen concentrations at low and high tourniquet pressures, and the influence of storage time on fibrinogen concentrations. The fibrinogen concentrations at each tourniquet pressure were compared at each time interval by using the paired-samples sign test. A 0.05 significance level was used for statistical tests. A critical difference or relative change value in fibrinogen measurement was defined as 5% on the basis of prospective population studies [16]. The percentage of subjects with a difference in fibrinogen values [greater than or equal to]5% was determined at low tourniquet pressure that was applied for 0-1 min, 2-3 min, and 4-5 min.

The first-stick phenomenon was evaluated in 115 subjects by comparing the fibrinogen concentration from the first-acquired sample (2.58 [+ or -] 0.47 g/L) with the average fibrinogen concentration of the next four samples (2.57 [+ or -] 0.47 g/L). No statistically significant difference was observed (P = 0.73).

The application of low tourniquet pressure was associated with a progressive increase in the concentration of plasma fibrinogen (P <0.00005) across the three sample acquisition time periods (Table 1). The fibrinogen concentrations were significantly higher for samples acquired during intervals at 2-3 min (2.68 [+ or -] 0.70 g/L, P <0.00005) and 4-5 min (2.70 [+ or -] 0.71 g/L, P = 0.0005) compared with those acquired during the first minute (2.62 [+ or -] 0.63 g/L). There was no statistically significant difference between samples obtained at 2-3 min and those acquired at 4-5 min (P = 0.23).

Similarly, samples acquired under conditions of high tourniquet pressure increased across the three sampling time periods (P <0.00005). The concentration of fibrinogen was greater for samples acquired at 4-5 min (2.69 [+ or -] 0.45 g/L) than those obtained within the first minute after tourniquet application (2.59 [+ or -] 0.42 g/L, P <0.00005) or at 2-3 min (2.62 [+ or -] 0.41 g/L, P <0.00005). There was no statistically significant difference between samples acquired at 2-3 min and those obtained within the first minute (P = 0.11).

Mean fibrinogen was not influenced by the tourniquet pressure at 0-1 min (P = 0.87), 2-3 min (P = 0.13), or 4-5 min (P = 0.62) (Table 1).

Fibrinogen remained stable at 4[degrees]C for 48 h (P = 0.11) with mean values of 2.53 [+ or -] 0.35 g/L at baseline, 2.51 [+ or -] 0.36g/L at 6 h, 2.54 [+ or -] 0.40 g/L at 24 h, and 2.57 [+ or -] 0.45 g/L at 48 h.

The current recommended procedure for acquiring samples for fibrinogen analysis by the Clauss method mandates that the first sample be discarded [23-25]. Discarding of the first tube of blood or the "first-stick phenomenon", although not evaluated, has been considered standard practice. This recommendation has been promulgated because tissue thromboplastin could interfere with coagulation assays by activating the intrinsic pathway. For example, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) investigators clearly state that the first 3 mL obtained after venipuncture must be discarded [25].

We demonstrate that the first acquired sample can be submitted for fibrinogen analysis. We have found several published reports that investigate the influence of tourniquet pressure or duration on fibrinogen measurements. The Cardiovascular Health Study investigators reported tourniquet use for only a brief duration in nearly all of the 5000 samples, but 1.2% of phlebotomies required tourniquet application for >2 min [26]. The influence of longer periods of venous occlusion on fibrinogen concentrations was evaluated in several studies. In 25 hyperlipidemic patients, venous occlusion for 10 min resulted in a 3.7% increase in fibrinogen (3.27 to 3.39 g/L, P = 0.052) [27]. Larger increases in fibrinogen after 10 min of tourniquet application were reported for 20 hypertriglyceridemic patients (4.86 to 6.12 g/L or 26%, P <0.005) and 20 normolipidemic patients (3.42 to 3.96 g/L or 16%, P <0.005) [28]. A 14.5% increase in fibrinogen concentration was reported after 15 min of tourniquet application (3.24 to 3.71 g/L, P <0.001) in 28 healthy subjects [29]. These studies support our results that the duration of venous occlusion has a significant influence on fibrinogen concentrations.

The stability of fibrinogen throughout storage is important for multicenter studies that involve delays from shipping and sample processing. We demonstrate that plasma samples stored at 4[degrees]C remain stable for 48 h. The ARIC investigators examined the impact of temporary storage time on fibrinogen concentration assayed by the Clauss method (1 week at -70[degrees]C vs 30 min before the assay at 4[degrees]C) [26]. They found no significant difference in fibrinogen values with such conditions. Similar findings were obtained in plasma samples stored at 0, 1, 4, and 7 days and assayed fibrinogen by radial immunodiffusion [30].

In this report, we identify tourniquet duration as a critical determinant of preanalytical fibrinogen variability. On the basis of a critical fibrinogen variability of 5%, the application of low tourniquet pressure for 2-3 min resulted in 6 of 38 subjects with differences that exceeded 5%, and this doubled (12 of 38) with 4-5 min of tourniquet application.

We conclude that variability in fibrinogen measurements can be minimized by acquiring samples within 1 min after venipuncture and analyzing samples that have been stored at 4[degrees]C up to 48 h. The magnitude of tourniquet pressure has no influence on fibrinogen concentrations, and the first acquired blood sample can be used for fibrinogen analysis.

This work was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Leo Burnett and Co., Chicago, IL. We acknowledge the contributions of Amy E. McCormick for sample processing, Susan Shott for statistical analyses, and Mary Lou Briglio for manuscript preparation.

This paper was presented on May 4-6, 1996 at the Third International Conference on "Fibrinogen: A Cardiovascular Risk Factor" in Ulm, Germany.

References

[1.] Wilhelsen L, Svardsudd K, Korsan-Bengsten K, Larsson B, Welin L, Tibblin G. Fibrinogen as a risk factor for stroke and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1984;311:501-5.

[2.] Stone MC, Thorp JM. Plasma fibrinogen: a major coronary risk factor. J R Coll Gen Pract 1985;35:565-9.

[3.] Meade TW, Mellows S, Brozovic M, Miller GH, Chakrabarti RR, North RWS, et al. Haemostatic function and ischaemic heart disease: principal results of the Northwick Park Heart Study. Lancet 1986;ii:533-7.

[4.] Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Castelli WP, D'Agostino RB. Fibrinogen and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. JAMA 1987;258:1183-6.

[5.] Heinrich J, Balleisen L, Schulte H, Assman G, van de Loo J. Fibrinogen and factor VII in the prediction of coronary risk: results from the PROCAM study in healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb 1994;14:54-9.

[6.] Yarnell JW, Baker IA, Sweetnam PM, Bainton D, O'Brien JR, Whitehead PJ, Elwood PC. Fibrinogen, viscosity, and white blood cell count are major risk factors for ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1991;83:836-44.

[7.] Cremer P, Nagel D, Labrot B, Mann H, Muche R, Elster H, Seidel D. Lipoprotein Lp(a) as predictor of myocardial infarction in comparison to fibrinogen, LDL cholesterol and other risk factors: results from the prospective Gottingen Risk Incidence and Prevalence Study (GRIPS). Eur J Clin Invest 1994;24:444-53.

[8.] Fowkes FGR, Lowe GDO, Housley E, Rattray A, Rumley A, Elton RA, et al. Crosslinked fibrin degradation products, progression of peripheral arterial disease, and risk of coronary heart disease. Lancet 1993;342:84-6.

[9.] Lowe GDO, Fowkes FGR, Dawes J, Donnan PT, Lennie SE, Biol MI, Housely E. Blood viscosity, fibrinogen, and activation of coagulation and leukocytes in peripheral arterial disease and the normal population in the Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation 1993;87:1915-20.

[10.] Thompson SG, Kienast J, Pyke SDM, Haverkate F, van de Loo JCW, for the European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1995;332: 635-41.

[11.] Thompson SG, Fechtrup C, Squire E, Heyse U, Breithardt G, van de Loo JCW, Kienast J. Antithrombin III and fibrinogen as predictors of cardiac events in patients with angina pectoris. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:35762.

[12.] Benderly M, Graff E, Reicher-Reiss H, Behar S, Brunner D, Goldbourt U, for the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study Group: fibrinogen is a predictor of mortality in coronary heart disease patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:351-6.

[13.] Banerjee AK, Pearson J, Gilliland EL, Goss D, Lewis JD, Stirling Y, Meade TW. A six year prospective study of fibrinogen and other risk factors associated with mortality in stable claudicants. Thromb Haemost 1992;68: 261-3.

[14.] Martin JF, Bath PMW, Burr ML. Influence of platelet size on outcome after myocardial infarction. Lancet 1991;338:1409-11.

[15.] Meade TW. Fibrinogen and other clotting factors in cardiovascular disease. In: Francis RB, ed. The hemostatic system, endothelial function and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1992:134.

[16.] Rosenson RS, Tangney C, Hafner JM. Intraindividual variability of fibrinogen levels and cardiovascular risk profile. Arterioscler Thromb 1994;14:1928-32.

[17.] Geffken DF, Keating FG, Kennedy MH, Cornell ES, Bovill EG, Tracy RP. The measurement of fibrinogen in population-based research. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118:1106-9.

[18.] Clauss A. Gerinnungsphysiologische schnellmethode zur bestinnung des fibrinogens. Acta Haematol 1957;17:237-46.

[19.] Eisenberg S. Effect of posture and position of the venous sampling site in the hematocrit and serum protein concentration. J Lab Clin Med 1963;61: 755-60.

[20.] Rosenson RS. Myocardial injury, acute phase response and lipoprotein metabolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:933-40.

[21.] SAS/STAT Corp. SAS 4th ed, Version 6. 10. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1990.

[22.] SPSS, Inc. SPSS-PC+ Version 5. 02. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.; 1993.

[23.] Beller FK, Graeff H. Equipment and general requirements for the coagulation laboratory. In: Bang NU, Beller FK, Deutsch E, Mammen EF, eds. Thrombosis and bleeding disorders: theory and methods. New York: Academic Press, 1971:

[24.] Gralnick HR, Evatt BL, Huseby RM, Triplett DA. Procedural standards for the prothrombin time. In: Triplett DA, ed. Standardization of coagulation assays. Skokie, IL: College of American Pathologists, 1982.

[25.] Papp AC, Hatzakis H, Bracey A, Wu KK. ARIC Hemostasis Study-I. Development of a blood collection and processing system suitable for multicenter hemostatic studies. Thromb Hemost 1989;61:15-9.

[26.] Cushman M, Cornell ES, Howard PR, Bovill EG, Tracy RP. Laboratory methods and quality assurance in the cardiovascular health study. Clin Chem 1995;41:264-70.

[27.] Glueck CJ, Glueck HI, Tracy T, Speirs J, McCray C, Stroop D. Relationships between lipoprotein(a), lipids, apolipoproteins, basal and stimulated fibrinolytic regulators, and D-dimer. Metabolism 1993;42:236-46.

[28.] Avellone G, Di Garbo V, Cordova R, Raneli G, DeSimone R, Bompiani GD. Fibrinolysis in hypertriglyceridaemic subjects in response to venous occlusion. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1993;4:429-33.

[29.] Huber K, Beckmann R, Frank H, Kneussl M, Mlczoch J, Binder BR. Fibrinogen, t-PA, and PAI-1 plasma levels in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:929-33.

[30.] Kinlay S, Gleeson M, Dobson AJ, Heller RF. Effect of processing time and storage on fibrinogen content of EDTA plasma assayed by radial immunodiffusion [Letter]. Clin Chem 1992;38:1197.

Robert S. Rosenson *, Beth A. Staffileno, and Christine C. Tangney (1) (Preventive Cardiol. Center, Lipoprotein and Hemorheol. Res. Facility, Depts. of Med., Pathol., and (1) Clin. Nutr., Rush--Presbyterian--St. Luke's Med. Center, 1653 W. Congress Pkwy., Chicago, IL 60612; * author for correspondence: fax 312-226-7013, email rrosenso@rush.edu)
Table 1. Influence of tourniquet pressure on fibrinogen
concentration. (a)

 Tourniquet duration, min

Tourniquet 0-1 2-3
pressure

Low 2.62 [+ or -] 0.63 2.68 [+ or -] 0.70
High 2.59 [+ or -] 0.42 2.62 [+ or -] 0.41
P value (c) 0.87 0.13

 Tourniquet duration, min

Tourniquet 4-5 P value for trend (b)
pressure

Low 2.70 [+ or -] 0.71 <0.00005
High 2.69 [+ or -] 0.45 <0.00005
P value (c) 0.62

(a) Fibrinogen concentrations (g/L) are expressed as mean [+ or -] SD.

(b) P value reflects the comparison of fibrinogen values obtained at
the three time intervals of tourniquet application by the Friedman
test.

(c) P value reflects the comparison of fibrinogen values at a
particular time interval between low and high pressures with a
paired-samples sign test.
COPYRIGHT 1998 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Technical Briefs
Author:Rosenson, Robert S.; Staffileno, Beth A.; Tangney, Christine C.
Publication:Clinical Chemistry
Date:Mar 1, 1998
Words:2632
Previous Article:Preanalytical determinants of total and free prostate-specific antigen and their ratio: Blood collection and storage conditions.
Next Article:Is prostate-specific antigen present in female serum?
Topics:


Related Articles
Fibrinogen levels in Polycythemia Vera patients and hematocrit target for performing a therapeutic phlebotomy in southwest Alabama.
Poor agreement among prothrombin time International Normalized Ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents.
Convenient and effective method for removing fibrinogen from serum specimens before protein electrophoresis.
D-dimer concentrations in normal pregnancy: new diagnostic thresholds are needed.
Effect of specimen collection on routine coagulation assays and D-dimer measurement.
Plasma protein contents determined by fourier-transform infrared spectrometry.
Within-person variation of plasma homocysteine and effects of posture and tourniquet application.
CryoSeal[R] system, a new device for generating cryoprecipitate from plasma.
Baseline repeated measures from controlled human exposure studies: associations between ambient air pollution exposure and the systemic inflammatory...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters