Printer Friendly

Effects of salt-drought stress on growth and physiobiochemical characteristics of Tamarix chinensis seedlings.

1. Introduction

Tamarix chinensis belongs to the Tamarix family (Tamaricaceae), which are mainly xerophytes. It is native to China and Korea, and it is known in many other parts of the world as an introduced species and sometimes an invasive noxious weed. It easily inhabits moist habitat with saline soils. T. chinensis as an ornamental plant was introduced into North America at the beginning of nineteenth Century and later into the southwest American desert regions for windbreak and sand fixation. Tamarix chinensis receives more attention amongst different Tamarix species [1]. Because of its strong adaptability to the local environment, T. chinensis replaced the native species, and as the rapid invasion to many rivers and desert edges results in the loss of biodiversity in arid area, water consumption increased and a series of related problems are listed as USA ten alien invasive species [2, 3]. As a native species in China, T. chinensis is mainly distributed in the northwest arid area of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Gansu, and it is also the main species for vegetation restoration of ecological restoration and protection for the coastal wetlands of Bohai Gulf. The Yellow River Delta is the most concentrated distribution area of T. chinensis [4], but this area is being threatened by hydrological changes [1]. In recent years, due to the large amount of groundwater exploitation of local area, seawater intrusion led to soil salinity and the evaporation to precipitation ratio increased. Due to the lack of freshwater resources, the salt and drought stress became the two major effect factors on local T. chinensis seedlings growth [4, 5].

As known, soil is an essential component of wetland ecosystem, which can support, hold, and regulate water and nutrients [6]. However, the effects of drought stress and salt stress on the growth and development of plants are coupled together, by reducing the soil solution water potential. Many of the previous studies are focused on the interaction between salt and drought and its effect on plant growth and physiological and biochemical characteristics [7-10]. The effects of salt and drought stress on plant physiological and biochemical properties are mainly concentrated in the Ammodendron bifolium [7, 10], Gleditsia sinensis [8], and Cercis chinensis Bunge seedlings [9]. But the stress physiology researches of T. chinensis mainly concentrated on single salt stress [11-14] or drought stress [15, 16], such as salt stress on the growth of T. chinensis [11], physiological and biochemical characteristics during the leaf expansion period [17], photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment substances [12], and salt secretion characteristics and influence factor under saline habitats [13]. Furthermore, the drought resistance mechanism under different stress levels [15] and physiological and ecological characteristics [16] under different environment had been carried out. But the physiological and biochemical characteristics response of T. chinensis to the salt-drought intercross stress conditions has not been reported. This study was aimed at analyzing the change dynamic of biomass, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and osmotic adjusting substances under different gradients of salinity stress-drought intercross stresses treatment, simulating the soil moisture and soil salinity conditions of sea-side and land-side and clarifying the growth and physiobiochemical characteristics of T. chinensis under different salt-drought stresses conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plants. Three-year-old Tamarix chinensis seedlings were selected from National Marine Ecological Conservation Region at Changyi county in Shandong Province, China. Previous works indicated that these seedlings had homogenesis traits in physiological and morphological aspects.

2.2. Experimental Setup. The experiments were carried out in a greenhouse at Binzhou University, Binzhou, China, from March 21, 2013, to June 15, 2013. T. chinensis seedlings of 3a old had been transplanted to research greenhouse, cocultivated using pots diameter 30 cm, high 50 cm, 1 plants per pot, a total of 24 plants, potted matrix for sandy loam soil (salt content 0.02%). T. chinensis seedlings normal growth after April 20th 2013 to salt and drought stress treatment. Drought stress treatment using Hsiao [14] moisture gradient design method, includes high soil moisture (mild drought stress) and low soil moisture (serve drought stress); the soil relative water content was 55%~60% and 30%~35%. Salinity (soil salinity/soil dry weight) by NaCl solution configuration of different gradient times irrigation to control, set up 2 levels, the salt concentrations were 0.4%, 1.2% and 2.5%, and the salt content of 0.02% as control. The pot bottom is provided with a tray whose depth is 8 cm, the leakage water into the pot and the cleaning tray, clean water is poured into the pot to prevent salt loss [18]. The experiment consists of 8 (2 x 4) salt-drought treatments. Each treatment was repeated 3 times and was designed by randomized block arrangement. Salt and drought stress treatment for 8 weeks (From April 20th to June 15th), determination of sample indexes.

2.3. Plant Sampling and Analysis. The same position of T. chinensis seedlings mature leaves was collected and dried, ground and sieved through a 120 mesh sieve, and sealed with plastic bags to be measured.

2.3.1. Physiological and Biochemical Indexes. The SOD activity was determined by nitro blue tetrazolium [19, 20] four photochemical reduction method; the activity of POD [21] was measured using guaiacol colorimetric method; MDA was measured by TBA colorimetric method [19].

2.3.2. Determination of Proline Content. Take 0.05 g of dry sample into a centrifuge tube, sulfosalicylic acid with 10 mL 3%, sealing bag seal affixed after boiling water bath extraction for 30 min; after cooling centrifugal (3000r/min, 10 min), 1 mL supernatant fluid, 1 mL 3% sulfosalicylic acid, acetic acid, and 2 mL 2.5% acid indene ketone were added to three glass test tubes (tube with glass balls) in boiling water bath for 60 min chromogenic reaction; then we cool them to room temperature to join the 4 mL toluene and shake extracted red material, still taking the toluene layer, in the 520 nm absorbance (OD) [19].

2.4. Statistical Analysis. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS 18.0. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the significance of different salt and drought treatment effects on growth and the physiological characteristics. Mean treatment differences were separated by the LSD test (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01) if F-tests were significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Salt and Drought Stresses on the Growth Traits of T. chinensis. As can be seen from Table 1, T. chinensis plant height increased more significantly (P < 0.05) in the salt content at 0.4% level, respectively, 34.7% and 15.0%, than CK under high and low soil moisture, but the plants died under the stress condition with salinity 2.5% and high soil moisture (see Figure 2). The main root length of T. chinensis showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between 0.4% salt stress treatment and CK under high soil moisture level, but the main root length of 1.2% salt stress treatment was shorter obviously than CK (P < 0.05). Under low soil moisture condition, the main root length increased first and then decreased, and the main root length of 1.2% salt stress treatment was significantly longer than CK (P < 0.05). The basal diameter of T. chinensis increased first and then decreased with the increase of the salt content in the two kinds of soil moisture conditions and reached the maximum at 0.4%, and the salt content of 1.2% was significantly decreased (P < 0.05).

Under the mild and severe drought stress, aboveground parts and underground parts dry weight of T. chinensis was both increased first and then decreased with the salt stress increase, and reached the maximum value at the salt content of 0.4%. In addition, plant individuals of T. chinensis still alive under the severe drought stress, while died in mild drought under severe salt stress, it may be appropriate drought stress can improved T. chinensis to a certain extent of salt tolerance to water logging and saline habitats. The above results showed that the effects of salt stress on the growth of T. chinensis were more than drought stress, although there are certain inhibitory effects of drought stress on T. chinensis. In the meanwhile, the variation degree of aboveground dry weight was higher than those of the underground parts under the drought stress and salt stress treatments.

3.2. Effects of Salt and Drought Stresses on SOD and POD Enzymes Activities of T. chinensis Seedlings. We can see from Figure 1, under mild drought stress, SOD activity in leaves of T. chinensis increased with the salt content decrease, and the difference between the salt stress treatment was significant (P < 0.05); compared with CK, SOD activity of leaves decreased significantly in the salt content of 0.4% (P < 0.05) and decreased obviously in the salt content of 1.2% and 2.5% (P < 0.01). Under low soil moisture conditions, the SOD activity in leaves increased first and then decreased with the salinity increasing, and the activity of SOD increased about 30% and 80%, respectively, compared with CK in the salinity of 0.4% and 1.2%, then reached the maximum value at salinity 1.2%, and was significantly lower in the salt content of 2.5% (P < 0.05). Under the same salt stress, the effects of different drought stress and salt stress effect on SOD activity were significant (P < 0.01). By the double factor variance analysis, SOD activity in leaves of T. chinensis by containing salt and salt drought intercross stress was significant (P < 0.01).

Under mild drought stress condition, the leaf POD activity decreased first and then increased and then decreased with the increase of soil salt content; the difference among all treatments was extremely significant (P < 0.01). Under severe drought stress, POD activity in leaves is increased first and then decreased with the increasing of salinity, and the salt content of 0.4% and 1.2% was increased 20% and 50%, respectively, more than those of CK and decreased approximately 15% compared to those in the salt content 2.5% (P < 0.05). Under the same salt stress, the effects of different drought stress and salt effect on POD activity also reached extremely significant level. Double factor variance analysis showed that salt stress, drought stress, and salt drought intercross stress had significant effects on POD activity of T. chinensis leaf.

3.3. Effects of Salt and Drought Stresses on MDA Content. MDA content in leaves of T. chinensis was firstly decreased and then increased under mild drought stress and reached the minimum value in the salt content of 1.2% and 0.4%. Under severe drought stress, the content of MDA in leaves increased first and then decreased and reached the maximum (11.96 nmol x [mg.sup.-1] prot) at salinity 0.4%, 3.75 times of CK (P < 0.01). The content of MDA in leaves decreased in the salinity 1.2% but is still significantly higher than that of control. At the salinity of 2.5%, MDA content significantly decreased compared to other treatments but had no significant difference compared to the control. Double factor variance analysis showed that the effect of salt stress on the content of MDA was significant (P < 0.05), and drought stress or salt drought intercross stress effect on the MDA content reached extremely significant level (P < 0.01). Under the severe drought and light salt stress, the content of MDA reached a maximum value.

3.4. Effect of Salt Stress and Drought Stress on Proline Content in Leaves. As seen from Figure 3, the proline content in the leaves of T. chinensis increased at different extent with the increase of salt and drought stress in this study.

Under light drought stress condition, the proline content increased gradually with salt stress increases, but the had no significant difference compared with CK (P > 0.05); under the severe drought, the proline content in leaves decreased first and then increased with the enhancement of salt stress intensity, and the content at the salinity of 2.5% was significantly higher than that of CK (P < 0.05). When the salt concentration was below 2.5%, the proline content under different drought stress had no significant difference (P > 0.05). Double factor variance analysis showed that both salt stress and drought stress had significant effects on the content of proline in leaves of Tamarix seedlings (P < 0.05), and the mild drought stress is able to enhance accumulation of proline in leaves of T. chinensis, to adapt to the saline environment.

4. Discussion

4.1. Salt-Drought Intercross Stress Affected Plant Growth and Biomass Allocation. As usually, salt-drought stress can delay plants growth and inhibit differentiation of plant tissue and reduce fresh weight of leaf, stem, and root with the salt stress increase [22]. Previous study showed that soils along the coastal area could form gradients of salinity and vegetation development during the desalinization process [23]. With the salt content increasing, Tamarix hispida stress symptoms become more obvious, survival rate decreased, and high growth was inhibited [11]. Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedlings adapt to drought stress by adjusting the biomass allocation and modified shape to achieve efficient use of existing habitat resources [24]. This study showed that T chinensis had stronger tolerance of drought stress, but its growth was affected significantly by salt stress. Furthermore, the changing of T. chinensis biomass is obvious with the salt stress intensified and to adapt to high sanity environment by reducing plant height, basal diameter, and dry matter weight. In a word, T. chinensis maintained the normal growth under salt and drought conditions by adjusting the biomass allocation and its form.

4.2. Salt-Drought Stress Affected Enzyme System. SOD and POD are the main antioxidant enzymes in plants [7-9, 16] and play an important role in scavenging superoxide ion, resisting lipid peroxidation, reducing membrane damage, and so forth. The previous research results showed that, under stress conditions, the intensity and rise or fall of drought resistance related enzymes activity were related closely to plant species or varieties [25]. During experiment progress, enzyme activity increased with the stress increasing or first increased and then decreased. Like Gleditsia sinensis Lam, its SOD and POD activity first increased and then decreased under salt drought intercross stress condition, and in the same treatment condition, both SOD and POD activities were decreased along with the extension of treatment time. This study showed that leaf SOD and POD activity of T. chinensis had different change patterns under different intercross salt and drought stress. Under light drought stress, SOD activity decreased; POD activity decreased first and then increased and then decreased; this dynamic progress was related to that the low concentration of salt stress is able to alleviate the effects related to drought stress. In contrast, under severe salt stress, protective enzyme system was breached and enzyme activity was inhibited strongly, leading to further reduce in the moderate activity. Under the severe drought condition, the activities of SOD and POD decreased so obviously that it was not enough to clear free radicals in the body; then it resulted in lipid peroxidation and the damage of membrane system [8, 16].

4.3. Hydraulic-Salt Stress Affected MDA Contents. MDA is often used as a major index to judge the membrane lipid peroxidation, and its content represents the degree of damage [7, 8, 26]. Researchers found that MDA content of Ammodendron bifolium and Gleditsia sinensis seedlings membrane permeability increased along with the salt and drought intercross stress intensified. This study showed that appropriate salt drought intercross stress can weaken the peroxidation of membrane lipid, and then MDA content is relatively low, with less damage to the membrane system. However, under severe drought and mild to moderate salt stress, T. chinensis accumulated so much free radical that initiated peroxidation of membrane lipid and then injured cell membrane. But in severe salt and drought stress, MDA content decreased significantly, which may be a dominant factor and its salt drought intercross stress adaptive regulation; its mechanism still needs further analysis and discussion.

4.4. Salt-Drought Stress Affected Osmotic Adjusting Substances Contents. Osmotic adjusting substances play an important role for plants during the progress of growth, development, and reproduction in salt and drought stress [27]. Under natural conditions, plants frequently suffer multiple environmental stresses, and the combined effects of environmental stresses on plants are complex and are not equal to the sum by simply adding the effect of each single factor [28]. Under the salt and drought stress conditions, large accumulation of intracellular soluble sugar and proline improves the cell sap concentration, maintains normal cell turgor, prevents excessive water loss, and enhances the resistance of plants [29]. A large number of studies showed that the soluble sugar is one kind of important organic osmotic regulators under adversity condition; it not only has a stabilizing effect on cell membrane and protoplast and providing carbon skeletons and energy for the synthesis of protein but also indirectly transmuted into proline [30]. This study showed that, in the salt drought intercross stress, soluble sugar contents in the leaves of T. chinensis seedlings gradually increased with the stress degree enhancement, and in severe salt and drought stress, the soluble sugar content began to decrease. That is to say that the soluble sugar plays an important role in osmotic adjustment, but the permeability of soluble sugar regulation has certain limitations; for example, under serve drought stress, the osmotic adjustment ability of T. chinensis reduced greatly or was lost. Proline is usually considered as one of main osmotic substances for plants used to regulate potential balance of cytoplasmic and vacuolar infiltration under salt stress [31]. This study showed that proline of T. chinensis increased gradually with increasing of salt and drought stress, but under mild drought stress it did not increase significantly; the cumulative amount of proline was low, only significantly increased in severe salt stress and severe drought stress conditions.

5. Conclusion

In summary, research on the relationships between plants and their environmental conditions has become a hotspot in present ecology studies. In this study, the growth and physiobiochemical characteristics of T. chinensis is able to adapt to the stress environment by adjusting the growth pattern and alternating soluble sugar and proline content, protective enzyme activity, and other physiobiochemical indexes to improve the ability to adapt to adversity. T. chinensis showed strong drought resistance and salt tolerance, and its growth conditions and physiobiochemical characteristics were related closely to the outside environmental factors, such as soil salinity and soil moisture status. On the other hand, the intercross compatibility of T. chinensis to salt and drought stresses can enhance the salt resistance under appropriate drought stress, and the dominant factor influencing the physiological biochemical characteristics of T. chinensis shows some differences with the changing of salt-drought intercross stress gradients. As Tamarix chinensis communities degrades in the Yellow River Delta, due to environment change and anthropogenic activities, then, the results of this study has certain theoretical and practical significance for the evaluation of T. chinensis resistance and reproductive technology, but the internal adjustment mechanism and adaptation mechanism need to be further researched in future.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors' Contribution

Junhua Liu and Jiangbao Xia contributed equally to this work.


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31370702, 31100468, and 41201023), by Science and Technology Plan of Universities in Shandong Province (no. J13LC03), by the promotive research fund for excellent young and middle-aged scientists of Shandong Province (no. BS2013NY010), and by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu High Education Institutions, pApD.


[1] B. Cui, Q. Yang, K. Zhang, X. Zhao, and Z. You, "Responses of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) to water table depth and soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta, China," Plant Ecology, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 279-290, 2010.

[2] G. L. Anderson, R. I. Carruthers, S. Ge, and P. Gong, "Monitoring of invasive Tamarix distribution and effects of biological control with airborne hyperspectral remote sensing," International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2487-2489, 2005.

[3] C. R. Whitcraft, D. M. Talley, J. A. Crooks, J. Boland, and J. Gaskin, "Invasion of tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) in a southern California salt marsh," Biological Invasions, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 875-879, 2007.

[4] X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Sun, and D. Xia, "Changes of hydrological environment and their influences on coastal wetlands in the Southern Laizhou Bay, China," Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 119, no. 1-3, pp. 97-106, 2006.

[5] M. Yang, Study on the Coastal Zone Environment Degradation in the Southern Coastal of the Laizhou Bay and Its Control Policy, Ocean University of China, 2005.

[6] C. Huang, J. Bai, H. Shao et al., "Changes in soil properties before and after wetland degradation in the Yellow River Delta, China," Clean-Soil, Air, Water, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1125-1130, 2012.

[7] W. W Zhuang, J. Li, and M. H. Cao, "Effects of salt- drought intercross stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Ammodendron argenteum (Pall.) kuntze seedlings," Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 730-736, 2010.

[8] Z. Q. Yu, M. G. Sun, H. X. Wei et al., "Effects of salt and drought intercross stresses on activity of cell defense enzymes in leaves of Gleditsia sinedsis Lam. Seedlings," Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 29-32, 2007

[9] T L. Lv, M. G. Sun, S. H. W. Song et al., "Study on photosynthesis characteristics of Cercis chinensis Bunge under drought and salt stress," Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science), vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 191-195, 2010.

[10] W. W. Zhuang, J. Li, M. H. Cao et al., "Changes of osmotic adjusting substances in leaves of Ammodendron argenteum seedlings under salt and drought stress," Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2010-2015, 2010.

[11] X. H. Dong and G. Z. H. Yue, "Effects on growth of Tamarix hispida willd under salt stress," Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, vol. 25, pp. 154-155, 2010.

[12] W. H. Wang, X. M. Zhang, H. L. Yan et al., "Effects of salt stress on photosynthesis and smoregulation Substances of Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb," Arid Zone Research, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 561-568, 2009.

[13] Y. Chen, H. Wang, F. S. Zhang, J. Xi, and Y. He, "The characteristic of salt excretion and its affected factors on Tamarix ramosissima ledeb under desert saline-alkali habitat in Xinjiang Province," Acta Ecologica Sinica, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 511-518, 2010.

[14] T. C. Hsiao, "Physiological effects of plant in response to water stress," Plant Physiology, vol. 24, pp. 519-570, 1973.

[15] M. Chen, Y. N. Chen, and W. H. Li, "Physiological response of Tamarix spp.for different groundwater depths in the middle reaches of Tarim river in China," Acta Botanica Boreali Occidentalia Sinica, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1415-1421, 2008.

[16] W. Q. Zhao, L. Zhuang, F. Yuan et al., "Physiological and ecological characteristic of Haloxylon ammodendron and Tamarix ramosissima in different habitatas on the southern edge of Zhunger Basin," Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 285-289, 2010.

[17] P. P. Xue, Ch. H. Cao, X. D. He et al., "Physiological and biochemical properties of Fraxinus velutina and Tamarix chinensis during the leaf expansion period under heavy salt stress," Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitis Nankaiensis, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 18-23, 2009.

[18] G. B. Wang, F. L. Cao, and Q. Wang, "The effect of soil salt contents on uptake of nutrients of baldcypress," Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 58-62, 2004.

[19] H. S. Li, Principle and Technology of Plant Physio--Biochemical Experiment, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, 2000.

[20] G. H. Luo and A. G. Wang, Guideline for Modern Plant Physiology Experiments, Science Press, Beijing, China, 1999.

[21] A. J. Mao and Y. J. Wang, "Variation of polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonialylase in hot pepper seedlings infected by Phytophthora capsici L.," Acta agricultural Boreali-Sinica, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 66-69, 2003.

[22] Sh. H. Yang, J. Ji, and G. Wang, "Effects of salt stress on plants and the mechanism of salt tolerance," World Science-Technology Rearch & Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 70-76, 2006.

[23] G. Xu, H. B. Shao, J. N. Sun, and S. X. Chang, "Phosphorus fractions and profile distribution in newly formed wetland soils along a salinity gradient in the Yellow River Delta in China," Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 175, no. 5, pp. 721-728, 2012.

[24] Z. Y. Xie, W. H. Zhang, X. C. Liu et al., "Growth and physiological characteristics of Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedlings under soil drought stress," Acta Botany Boreal-Occident Sinica, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 948-954, 2010.

[25] R. S. Dhindsa, P. Plumb-dhindsa, and T. A. Thorpe, "Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase," Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 93-101, 1981.

[26] Y. Li, "Effect of salt and PEG to antioxidant enzymes activity and MDA concentration of Luffa cylindrical Roem," Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 159-162, 2009.

[27] S. Y. Rong, S. G. Guo, and T. Zhang, "Effects of drought stress on osmoregulation substances in sweet sorghum seedlings," Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 56-59, 2011.

[28] K. Yan, P. Chen, H. Shao et al., "Responses of Photosynthesis and Photosystem II to higher temperature and salt stress in sorghum," Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 218-225, 2012.

[29] J.-X. Liu, J.-C. Wang, R.-J. Wang, and H.-Y. Jia, "Interactive effects of drought and salinity stresses on growth and osmotica of naked oat seedlings," Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 244-248, 2012.

[30] Y. W. Shi, Y. L. Wang, and W. B. Li, "Effects of water stress on soluble protein, soluble sugar and praline content in Tamarix hispida," Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 5-8, 2007.

[31] G. R. Stewart and J. A. Lee, "The role of proline accumulation in halophytes," Planta, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 279-289, 1974.

Junhua Liu, (1,2) Jiangbao Xia, (2) Yanming Fang, (1) Tian Li, (2) and Jingtao Liu (2)

(1) College of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Forest University, Nanjing 210037, China

(2) Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for Yellow River Delta, Binzhou University, Binzhou 256603, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jiangbao Xia; and Yanming Fang;

Received 9 June 2014; Revised 3 July 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014; Published 22 July 2014

Academic Editor: Hongbo Shao

TABLE 1: Effects of Tamarix chinensis growth and biomass
conditions with different salt and drought stresses

Treatment                           Plant height (cm)

Water condition      Salinity

High soil moisture      CK       85.93 [+ or -] 7.65 (b)
  (mild drought)       0.4%     115.76 [+ or -] 10.28 (a)
                       1.2%      87.29 [+ or -] 5.96 (b)
                       2.5%                --
Low soil moisture       CK       85.70 [+ or -] 5.37 (b)
  (severe drought)     0.4%      98.58 [+ or -] 4.72 (a)
                       1.2%      74.43 [+ or -] 5.01 (c)
                       2.5%      86.24 [+ or -] 3.97 (b)

Treatment                        Main root length (cm)

Water condition      Salinity

High soil moisture      CK      14.54 [+ or -] 1.25 (a)
  (mild drought)       0.4%     15.58 [+ or -] 1.67 (a)
                       1.2%     11.56 [+ or -] 1.87 (b)
                       2.5%               --
Low soil moisture       CK      11.51 [+ or -] 1.12 (b)
  (severe drought)     0.4%     12.57 [+ or -] 1.25 (b)
                       1.2%     15.68 [+ or -] 1.67 (a)
                       2.5%     10.89 [+ or -] 1.02 (b)

Treatment                             Stem basal
                                    diameter (cm)

Water condition      Salinity

High soil moisture      CK      0.51 [+ or -] 0.12 (a)
  (mild drought)       0.4%     0.63 [+ or -] 0.26 (a)
                       1.2%     0.37 [+ or -] 0.14 (b)
                       2.5%               --
Low soil moisture       CK      0.47 [+ or -] 0.14 (a)
  (severe drought)     0.4%     0.49 [+ or -] 0.22 (a)
                       1.2%     0.35 [+ or -] 0.09 (b)
                       2.5%     0.36 [+ or -] 0.08 (b)

Treatment                             Overground
                                      biomass (g)

Water condition      Salinity

High soil moisture      CK      13.12 [+ or -] 2.89 (b)
  (mild drought)       0.4%     18.01 [+ or -] 3.35 (a)
                       1.2%     9.04 [+ or -] 3.02 (c)
                       2.5%               --
Low soil moisture       CK      12.89 [+ or -] 1.18 (b)
  (severe drought)     0.4%     15.67 [+ or -] 1.37 (a)
                       1.2%     6.95 [+ or -] 1.86 (c)
                       2.5%     5.26 [+ or -] 0.98 (c)

Treatment                            Underground
                                     biomass (g)

Water condition      Salinity

High soil moisture      CK      5.01 [+ or -] 0.97 (b)
  (mild drought)       0.4%     9.52 [+ or -] 2.71 (a)
                       1.2%     4.13 [+ or -] 1.85 (b)
                       2.5%               --
Low soil moisture       CK      4.86 [+ or -] 0.92 (b)
  (severe drought)     0.4%     7.03 [+ or -] 1.15 (a)
                       1.2%     3.72 [+ or -] 0.89 (b)
                       2.5%     2.63 [+ or -] 0.76 (c)

The different letters within the same row indicate the
significant difference at 0.05 level. "--" stands for
plant individual death.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Liu, Junhua; Xia, Jiangbao; Fang, Yanming; Li, Tian; Liu, Jingtao
Publication:The Scientific World Journal
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2014
Previous Article:Improving rutting resistance of pavement structures using geosynthetics: an overview.
Next Article:Soil characteristic comparison of fenced and grazed riparian floodplain wetlands in the typical steppe region of the inner Mongolian plateau, China.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |