Effects of dental aesthetics on psycho-social wellbeing among students of health sciences.
Keywords: Dental aesthetics, Index of orthodontic treatment need, Psychosocial impact and mental health.
Health plays a significant role in person's everyday life. Psycho-socially wellness serves as an integral part of general health and it should not be compromised because of bad dental aesthetics. Severely compromised aesthetics is a predictor of worst oral health quality of life.1 Smile and emotional expression plays a primary role in dental aesthetics.2
Dental aesthetic perceptions are found to be a prime factor in the development of a personality.3 In young adults, even slight deviation from the community norms results in lack of self-esteem related to appearance and considering others 'superior' to themselves. This results in a negative impact on their quality of life.3,4 To build a strong professional profile, self-confidence plays an important role in person's life. It also relates to the health and helps experiencing an achievement.5
Globally, much research work has been done on dental aesthetics and psychosocial impact and factors like age, gender and educational level also contribute in people's satisfaction towards dental aesthetics.6-9 Evidence has reported self-esteem as the vital component in aesthetics despite the importance of psychosocial impact. Although, men showed higher level of perfectionism than women however, women present with greater psychosocial impact than men.5 A study conducted by Cotrim ER et al in which they highlighted the perception of smile aesthetics among clinicians, orthodontists, dental students, and lay persons.10 Another study by Al Bataynh et al. reported that dental students showed higher knowledge of aesthetics compared to their other counterparts from other universities.11 Thus, it is concluded that awareness is a major factor which affects the judgment and perception of observer.12
Another study conducted in Malaysian population reported that females were more dissatisfied than males about their dentition status.13 According to a study in Kuwait, dental aesthetics among the patients was highly important considering tooth alignment as a major factor and tooth color as a secondary factor in dental aesthetics.14 Literature suggests that there is a strong association between self-perceived need regarding dental aesthetics and psychosocial wellbeing.3 Since the last decade, aesthetics has gained more importance than function and general and /or oral health. Patients have become more aware of dental aesthetics and are seeking treatment to achieve their idea of ideal aesthetics. Seeing as there are so many factors that influence a smile, perception of aesthetics needs more exploration.
Dental health is not given priority in comparison to overall well-being of a person due to cost of treatment, fear, anxiety and lack of oral hygiene importance in our society. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the impact of dental aesthetics and socio-demographics on psychosocial well-being among the students of health sciences.
Subjects and Methods
The analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at a private tertiary care health centre in Karachi from March to August 2018, and comprised medical, dental and pharmacy students. The sample size was calculated by using OpenEpi software, assuming the prevalence of impact of dental aesthetics on psychosocial well-being 50%, with 95% confidence interval(CI) and a bound of error 5%.15 The sample was raised using non-probability convenience sampling method. Those included were students regardless of gender and year of study aged 18-25 years who were present at the time of the study and who furnished informed written consent. Those excluded were students having prior orthodontic treatment and students undergoing current orthodontic treatment. Approval to conduct the study was taken from Principal Dental College.
Data was collected using a structured adapted questionnaire composed of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire(PIDAQ) which has four components; self-confidence, social impact, psychosocial impact and aesthetic concerns.4
Dental self-confidence was further explored through closed-ended questions regarding the appearance of teeth, tooth position and showing teeth while smiling. Social impact was assessed by perception of the subjects about their own teeth and how their everyday social life was affected by dentition. The third section of the questionnaire comprised subjects' comparison of their dentition with others. Aesthetic concern was assessed through questions based on attitude of subjects disliking their teeth in mirror and pictures.
The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Aesthetic Component(IOTN-AC) was also used to assess dental aesthetics by showing 10 photographs of anterior teeth malocclusion to the subjects who were subsequently asked to match their own dentition with any one of the photograph; from grade 1 'the best' to 10 'the worst'.4 After the grading, the subjects were divided into five groups based on IOTN grading; groups 1,2,3,4 and group 5 which comprised grades 5-10.
The data was collected during the study hours and on the campus. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. Quantitative data was expressed as means and standard deviation(SD) and qualitative data in terms of percentages and frequencies. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to check the normality of data, which was found to be not normally distributed(p<0.05), and, as such, non-parametric tests were applied for analysis. Mann-Whitney U Test was applied between gender and each of the four components separately. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine differences between the four components of PIDAQ and the year of education. The same test was applied between the PIDAQ components and the discipline of studies and for determining the difference among the mean scores of all the participating groups with dental self-confidence, social impact and psychosocial impact. P<0.05 was taken as statistically significant.
Of the 400 subjects approached, 385(96.25%) subjects responded. Of them, 122(31.7%) were males and 263(68.3%) were females. The overall mean age was 20.6+-1.70 years. There were 177(46%) medial students, 125(32.5%) dental and 83(21.6%) pharmacy undergraduates. Regarding IOTN-AC, 130(33.8%) students graded themselves in group 1, 71(18.4%) in group 2, 90(23.4%) in group 3, 37(9.6%) in group 4,and 57(14.8%) marked themselves in group 5(Table-1).
Table-1: Demographic characteristics of study population.
Year of Study
Table-2: Impact of dental aesthetics and sociodemographics on psychoscocial well-being.
Variables###Dental self-confidence###Social impact###Psychosocial Impact###Aesthetic concern
Year of education**###0.26###<0.001###0.53###0.01
Mean score of IOTN based groups**###0.001###0.000###0.003###0.02
Dental aesthetics concern and social impact factors were significantly different between the genders(p<0.05). The two factors were also significantly different with respect to years of study(p<0.05). Significant difference was observed between aesthetic concern and age(p<0.05). Dental self-confidence was the highest in IOTN-AC group 1 with a mean of 2.6+-1.02, and the lowest in group 5 with a mean of 2.0+-1.16(Table-2).
According to the findings, dental aesthetics and social impact factor were statistically significant among gender and study subjects from different years of study, varying from the first to the final year. Gender was statistically associated with social impact and aesthetic concerns. These findings are in accordance with earlier findings that generally females are more beauty conscious.16-18 A study also found lower psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in men and difference between genders was not significant.16 However, a study reported no gender difference between males and females on mean dental aesthetic perception score.19
Straight aligned teeth and pleasing smile add more attraction which indirectly raises a person's confidence which, in turn, raises more chance to get employed first in comparison to people with non-ideal smile.20 In the current study, the academic year was statistically significant with social impact and aesthetic concerns. These findings were in agreement with literature suggesting that the reason may be because of advancing knowledge and clinical exposure, the students become more concerned.21
The present study also found significant differences in the years of studies, and the findings are in accordance with a study indicating that it may be because of increasing knowledge and experience gained that the students think more critically with every advancing year of studies.19 Also, our study showed that students in IOTN group 1 had highest dental self-confidence and the least psycho-social impact whereas IOTN group 5 had the least dental self-confidence and the highest psycho-social impact. These findings are also in accordance with an earlier study.4
The current study also found no significant results separating medical, dental and pharmacy students. Similarly, an earlier study concluded that there was no difference between clinicians and lay-persons when it came to smile evaluation.22 One study reported that dental education was less influential in judging dental aesthetics.23 The reason for statistically non-significant difference among the three departments was probably the fact that all the students were from higher socio-economic background and were already aware about their physical appearance and aesthetics.
As such, this fact itself was a limitation of the study as all the subjects were from a single centre and that too a private tertiary care facility catering to people from high socio-economic strata. And since they are more conscious, the subjects tended to critically analyse themselves in every aspect, and that might be the reason behind the fact that only one-fourth of the students ranked themselves in IOTN grade 1. Another limitation of the study is this that dental students were not excluded from the sample which might have introduced a bias in the results. However, a study has reported that dental education plays a lesser role in critically evaluating dental aesthetics.24
Dental aesthetics was found to affect the psychological well-being of the subjects. Cosmetic treatments used to increase dental aesthetics will motivate individuals to interact freely with others and it will enhance their social status.
Conflict of Interest: None.
Source of Funding: None.
1. Feu D, de Oliveira BH, de Oliveira Almeida MA, Kiyak HA, Miguel JAM. Oral health-related quality of life and orthodontic treatment seeking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortho. 2010; 138:152-9.
2. Abidia RF, Azam A, El-Hejazi AA, Al-Mugbel KK, Haider MS, Al-Owaid NM. Female dental student's perception of their dental aesthetics and desired dental treatment. Eur Sci J 2017;13:171-81. doi: 10.19044/esj.2016.v13n3p171
3. Nazir R, Mahmood A, Anwar A. Assessment of psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics and self perceived orthodontic treatment need in young adults. Pak Oral Dental J. 2014; 34:312-16.
4. Khan M, Fida M. Assessment of psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics. J Coll Phy Surg Pak. 2008; 18:559-64.
5. Venete A, Trillo-Lumbreras E, Prado-Gasco VJ, Bellot-Arcis C, Almerich-Silla JM, Montiel-Company JM. Relationship between the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics and perfectionism and self-esteem. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9:1453-8.
6. Twigge E, Roberts RM, Jamieson L, Dreyer CW, Sampson WJ. The psycho-social impact of malocclusions and treatment expectations of adolescent orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38:593-601.
7. Boeira GF, Salas MMS, Araujo DC, Masotti AS, Demarco FF. Factors influencing dental appearance satisfaction in adolescents: a cross-sectional study conducted in Southern Brazil. Brazil J Oral Sci. 2016; 15:8-15.
8. Deng X, Wang YJ, Deng F, Liu Pl, Wu Y. Psychological well-being, dental aesthetics, and psychosocial impacts in adolescent orthodontic patients: A prospective longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153:87-96.
9. Motloba D, Sethusa M, Ayo-Yusuf O. The psychological impact of malocclusion on patients seeking orthodontic treatment at a South African oral health training centre. S Afr Dent J. 2016; 71:200-5.
10. Cotrim ER, Vasconcelos Junior AV, Haddad ACSS, Reis SAB. Perception of adults' smile aesthetics among orthodontists, clinicians and laypeople. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20:40-4.
11. Al-Batayneh OB, Owais AI, Khader YS. Oral Health Knowledge and Practices among Diverse University Students with Access to Free Dental Care: A Cross-Sectional Study. Open J Stom. 2014; 4:135-42.
12. Sadrhaghighi H, Zarghami A, Sadrhaghighi S, Eskandarinezhad M. Esthetic perception of smile components by orthodontists, general dentists, dental students, artists, and laypersons. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017;8:e12235.
13. Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011; 11:6.
14. Eltejaye L, Binthani F, Khalaf M. Perception of Dental aesthetics: Among Dental Patients in Kuwait. [Online] 2013 [Cited 2020 February 25]. Available from URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ff54/289043513650769fde74be3bbff0a90fae5a.pdf?_ga=2.203855888.1618299554.1582634110-1852721096.1580119727.
15. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version.[Online] [Cited 2018 December 03]. Available from: URL:www.OpenEpi.com
16. Afroz S, Rathi S, Rajput G, Rahman SA. Dental aesthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: A campus based survey of North Indian University students.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013; 13:455-60.
17. Hamdam AM. The relationship between patient, parent and clinician perceived need and normative orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26:265-71.
18. Bellot-Arcis C, Ferrer-Molina M, Carrasco-Tornero A, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM. Differences in psychological traits between lingual and labial orthodontic patients: perfectionism, body image, and the impact of dental aesthetics. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:58-63.
19. Livas C, Delli K. "Dental aesthetics: Perception from Future Dental Professionals". Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35:347-53.
20. Pithon MM, Nascimento CC, Barbosa GCG, Coqueiro RdS. Do dental aesthetics have any influence on finding a job?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146:423-9.
21. Bilal R. Self perception and satisfaction with dental aesthetics in dental students of Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. PakOral Dental J. 2016; 36:399-403.
22. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2008; 133:515-23.
23. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod. 2004; 31:204-9.
24. Manipal S, Mohan C S A, Kumar D L, Cholan P K, Ahmed A, Adusumilli P. The importance of dental esthetics among dental students assement of knowledge. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014; 4:48-51.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Zaidi, Abeeha Batool; Karim, Atiya Abdul; Mohiuddin, Sidra; Rehman, Khizra|
|Publication:||Journal of Pakistan Medical Association|
|Date:||Jun 16, 2020|
|Previous Article:||Doppler ultrasonographical findings in the differential diagnosis of post-partum thyroiditis.|
|Next Article:||Comparison of stress levels among medical and dental students in the clinical years of training and their coping strategies.|