Printer Friendly

Effects of curing time and end pressure on the tensile strength of finger-joined black spruce lumber.

Abstract

Finger-joined black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P) specimens from eastern Canada were prepared to assess the effect of curing time and end pressure on the tensile strength of the joints. An isocyanate adhesive cured at room temperature and a feather joint configuration were used for this purpose. The joints were machined at a 18.3 m/min. (60 ft./min) feed rate, 3500 rpm rotation speed, and 0.86 mm (0.034 in.) feed per knife (chip load). A single-face glueline application was used at a spread rate of 110 g/[m.sup.2]. Four curing times (1, 2, 5, and 24 hr.) and six end pressures ranging from 1.38 MPa to 4.82 MPa (200 to 700 psi) applied for 20 seconds were tested. The results showed that curing time and end pressure have a statistically significant influence on the performance of structural finger-joints. After 5 hours of curing time, finger-joints made with isocyanate can achieve more than 90 percent of the reference ultimate tensile strength based on 24 hours of curing time. Analysis also indicated that finger-joined black spruce has the best performance at an end pressure of 3.43 MPa (498 psi). Lower or higher end pressure can result in a lower tensile strength.

**********

Finger-joints are commonly used to produce engineered wood products from short pieces of lumber. Such joints must have excellent mechanical performance. To be suitable for structural uses, a joint must be subjected to a proper end pressure following machining and adhesive application. To produce acceptable products, technical parameters, such as machining and gluing processes must be optimized. The conditions of curing time and the pressure applied during joining play a major role in the gluing process and the final strength of the assemblies (CTBA 1973).

Isocyanate-based adhesives such as polyurethane (PUR) are a viable alternative for wood finger-jointing applications. They are gaining acceptance in North America for a variety of structural applications (Verreault 1999, Chen 2001, Lange et al. 2001). PUR adhesives develop a high strength and cure at ambient conditions. Hot-pressing or radio-frequency treatments can be used to accelerate the curing process. Studies by Pagel and Luckman (1984a, 1984b) have shown that PUR-bonded joints did not fail in creep and had good water resistance. King and Chen (2001) investigated the performance of a two-part PUR adhesive for finger-joint application and for I-joist assembly using various curing times. They tested black spruce among other species. Results showed that the adhesive cured in a relatively short time, which makes it suitable for finger-joint processing. However, no information is available on the influence of end pressure using this type of adhesive for finger-jointing black spruce. Thus, end pressure and curing time need to be further investigated for finger-joined black spruce made with isocyanate in order to determine optimum conditions for the production of finger-joints for structural applications.

The main function of the pressure is to bring the mating surfaces so close together that the glue forms a thin and continuous film between them. This pressure also allows a uniform distribution of the adhesive and creates an optimum glueline thickness. Several authors have investigated the effect of the glueline thickness on the strength of finger-joints (Ebewele et al. 1979, Sandoz 1984, Groom and Leitchi 1994, River 1994). They indicated that it is necessary to control the glueline thickness to produce strong joints. Thin gluelines lead to starved joints. Above the optimum glueline thickness, stress concentration develops in the adhesive layer due to cure-shrinkage. The pressure must be applied to force fingers together to form an interlocking connection, giving a certain immediate handling strength (Raknes 1982). The increase of the end pressure up to a certain point gives a better contact of the finger to obtain strong joints. However, cell damage or splitting of the finger root can be induced by excessive pressure (Jokerst 1981, Marra 1984, Kutscha and Caster 1987).

Several opinions exist regarding the amount of pressure needed to produce high-strength finger-joints. The German standard Deutsches Institut fuer Normung (DIN) 68-140 (1971) specifies minimum acceptable values for the different lengths of fingers, for example, 11.77 MPa (1707 psi) for 10-mm (0.4-in.) fingers and 1.96 MPa (284 psi) for 60-mm (2.4-in.) fingers. The German standard also establishes that a minimum pressure of 0.98 MPa (142 psi) must be applied (DIN 1971). Strickler (1980) stated that an end pressure of about 2.76 MPa (400 psi) is near optimum for most softwood species. With an increase in end pressure, a better contact between the sides of the finger is obtained and the gap between fingertip and root reduced. Thus, as a higher pressure is applied, more locking efficiency and performance can be obtained up to the point where damage to the tips of fingers or splitting of the wood occur (Dawe 1965). Madsen and Littleford (1962) used end pressures between 0 and 4.14 MPa (600 psi) with casein and phenol-resorcinol adhesives. Their results showed that 2.76 MPa (400 psi) end pressure was adequate to facilitate curing and to develop optimum tensile strength. Juvonen (1980) also studied the effects of end pressure on joint strength but considering the geometry and size of the finger. The end pressure had a relatively small effect on the long fingers; therefore, adequate joints could be obtained with a relatively low end pressure. However, with shorter fingers, the effect of end pressure in the low range was greater. As a result, a certain minimum pressure is required depending on the size of finger. Recently Ayarkwa et al. (2000) tested three end pressures on finger-joined African hardwoods. Results showed no significance of this parameter on modulus of rupture and modulus of elasticity in flexion. On the other hand, Sandoz (1984) noted that a "back pressure" can be obtained during the phase of relaxation of the pressure, which can cause separations and lead to adhesive-free gaps at the end of the finger.

In most of the cited studies, with different species, information is lacking about wood machining parameters, wood conditions, and finger-joint configuration. Therefore, the literature does not provide a comprehensive understanding of relationships between the various factors and end pressure for any particular species.

The final stage in manufacturing finger-joined wood products is the curing of the adhesive. Most of the adhesives commonly used require long periods to set, which is inconvenient and interferes with production. The adhesives in general must be heated to reduce the curing time either before or after application of the adhesive using a radio-frequency or conventional oven. The level and variation of moisture content in wood is very important because water absorbs energy and it interferes with the heating process. Also, the heating equipment required is expensive to buy, operate, and maintain.

The effect of curing time and end pressure on the performance of finger-joints of black spruce is important in the finger-jointing process. In this investigation, we studied the structural performance of finger-joined black spruce wood glued with an isocyanate adhesive, cured at four curing times and six end pressure levels.

Material and methods

Experiments were carried-out with 38- by 64-mm (2- by 3-in.) kiln-dried planed black spruce stud coming from the Chibougamau region in the province of Quebec. The studs were placed in a conditioning room at 20[degrees]C and 65 percent relative humidity to reach an equilibrium moisture content of 11.8 percent. Defects were removed from pieces by cross-cutting to produce blocks varying in length between 20 and 91 cm of No. 2 and better grades (NLGA 2000a). The defecting and sampling process was based on the Canadian NLGA-SPS 1-2000 specifications for structural joined wood (NLGA 2000b).

A Conception RP 2000 machine with a lateral feed system, common in the North American finger-jointing industry, was used. The ends of the blocks were machined across their width in order to obtain horizontal finger-joints. A feather profile was selected due to its good mechanical performance (Bustos et al. 2003). A chip load of 0.84 mm (0.034 in.) was obtained by setting the machine at 18.3 m/min. (60 ft./min.) feed speed, and 3500 rpm rotation speed, with six knife sets (bolts) per tool. The finger-joint geometry was 28.27 mm length (1.113 in.), 0.76 mm (0.030 in.) tip width, and 6.69 mm (0.263 in.) pitch. After finger-jointing, the blocks were glued with an adhesive formulation according to the technical recommendations supplied by the adhesive manufacturer. The adhesive was a two-component system consisting of an ISOSET UX-100 polyurethane prepolymer mixed with an ISOSET WD3-A322 emulsion polymer. These two components have to be mixed immediately prior to use. A single-face glueline application was used at a spread rate of 110 g/[m.sup.2]. The assembled joints were pressed at 20[degrees]C. The end pressure ranged from 1.38 MPa (200 psi) to 4.90 MPa (700 psi) and was applied for 20 seconds. The finger-joined lumber was crosscut at 2.44 m (8 ft.) to obtain specimens for tension tests. The speciments for the end pressure effect were mechanically tested after 24 hours of curing at room temperature. For the curing time effect, the specimens were assembled at 3.75 MPa (544 psi) and were evaluated after 1, 2, 5, and 24 hours of curing time.

Tension tests were performed according to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard D 198 (ASTM 1997a) and evaluated according to SPS-1 (NLGA 2000b) requirements using a Metriguard testing machine, model 412. Testing and data acquisition were controlled with software developed by Forintek Canada Corp. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was calculated. Failure modes were examined around the joints and classified according to ASTM D-4688 (1997b). Following mechanical tests, two samples were cut from each side of the failed joint and moisture content and density were determined following the ASTM D 2395-93 (1995). The average basic density of specimens was estimated at 448 kg/[m.sup.3]. Since specimens at the testing time were at 11.8 percent moisture content, their volume at the green state was adjusted based on a total volumetric shrinkage of 11.1 percent and a fiber saturation point of 30 percent.

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate the tension data (SAS-GLM procedure) (SAS Institute 1998). The Tukey's studentized range test was applied to identify significant differences at the 0.05 probability level. The normality assumption was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test and the homogeneity of variances by Levene and Bartlett tests. A nonlinear regression analysis was performed to describe tension strength (UTS) in terms of curing time or end pressure as independent variables (SAS-NLIN procedure) (SAS Institute 1998). Data points for curing time were fitted with a segmented model that included two sections, one quadratic and one linear, while data for end pressure effect was fitted with a quadratic equation.

Results and discussion

A summary of test results showing the influence of curing time on UTS is given in Table 1. The wood specimens built up enough strength to be handled after 1 hour of curing time, averaging above 26 MPa (3771 psi) of UTS. The ANOVA indicated that statistically significant differences existed among the four curing times studied; however, there were no significant differences between 1 and 2 hours or between 5 and 24 hours. But 1 and 2 hours yielded different results than 5 and 24 hours of curing time (Table 1). Results at 1 hour of curing time do not agree with those reported by King and Chen (2001) who studied the performance of a two-part PUR adhesive, ISOSET UX-100, for finger-joint application on 38- by 64-mm (nominal 2- by 3-in.) studs of black spruce. The UTS determined by King and Chen (2001) was considerably lower than the results from this study. Furthermore, after 2 hours of curing time, the UTS given by King and Chen was considerably higher than that determined in this study. Unfortunately, no details were given in the King and Chen paper on the other geometric, operational, and machining parameters that affect the process. Personal communications with Chen indicated that black spruce boards (2- by 3-in.) were finger-joined together; however, test specimens were cut into small strips 6.4 mm thick by 38 mm wide by 305 mm long (0.25 by 1.5 by 12 in.) before testing in tension in accordance with ASTM D 4688 (Chen 2002). Furthermore, the spread rate of adhesive was not controlled and the crowding pressure was 2 MPa (300 psi). These aspects could explain the differences between the two studies.

The joined wood was generally very strong in tension compared with SPS-1 requirements. Very high strength values were also obtained after 5 and 24 hours of curing, improving the UTS by 25 percent and 36 percent, respectively, compared to 1 hour of curing time. Results in this trial suggest that, after 1 hour of curing time at room temperature, finger-joints made with the isocyanate-based ISOSET UX-100/A322 could reach more than 70 percent of the reference strength achieved at 24 hours of curing time. This is quite important for the proof tension test that mills are required to conduct following joint assembly. A segmented regression model with two sections was used to fit all the results: quadratic (parabola) and linear (Fig. 1). The coefficient of determination was 0.60. The distribution of the data points indicated that the curing time had an influence on the UTS between 1 and 5 hours. King and Chen (2001) indicated that it took about 3 hours for black spruce joined lumber to reach full cure at room temperature. In our case, after 5 hours of curing time, the performance in tensile strength still increases, but slightly, until it stabilizes. The segmented regression model estimates that the maximum UTS could be already reached at 10 hours of curing time. Given the variability of results obtained, further investigation is needed to validate this estimation.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The relationship between strength and curing time is important because it shows how long it takes the finger-joint to develop enough strength to be handled without damage following gluing and assembling. Our experiments show that black spruce finger-joined with ISOSET UX-100/A322 met the proof tensile strength requirements of the NLGA SPS 1-2000 standard (NLGA 2000b) for No. 2 and Better (Table 1), even after 1 hour of curing time at room temperature.

A summary of results on the influence of end pressure on UTS is given in Table 2. The strength of the finger-joint in tension appears to be related to the amount of end pressure applied. The ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences among the six pressure levels (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). A second-degree polynomial was fitted to all data for the six end pressures (Fig. 2). The coefficient of determination was found to be low ([r.sup.2] = 0.22) even though the relationship was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The UTS increased slightly from 1.35 MPa (196 psi) end pressure, reached a maximum value at 3.43 MPa (498 psi), and then it decreased as the end pressure increased (Fig. 2). This result is not far from the optimum value of 2.76 MPa (400 psi) found by Strickler (1980) for softwood species. Pressure in excess of 3.43 MPa (498 psi) will likely cause a reduction of the UTS, provoking splitting due to compression load at the finger root, even without the tips of fingers reaching the roots of the opposite fingers. On the other hand, an end pressure of 1.35 MPa (196 psi) was enough for the joined wood to be handled, even though it represented the lowest performance on the structural properties. The mean strength value in all tension tests was higher than those specified in SPS 1-2000 (NLGA 2000b) for the spruce-pine-fir, grade No. 2 and better for finger-joined structural lumber (Table 2).

The quality of the glueline was also evaluated by the percent wood failure developed in the finger-joint according to ASTM D 4688-97 (ASTM 1997b). Generally, wood failure was high. More than 80 percent of specimens failed in modes number 3 and 4. Failure mode number 3 is mostly along the joint profile but with some failure at the finger roots, while mode 4 is with tensile wood failure occurring at the joint roots and with high overall wood failure. These modes of failure are usually associated with good gluing in structural finger-joined material. No glue failure was observed, which confirms that the gluing process was adequate. The high performance among the different curing times and end pressures of finger-joints studied is an indication of the good bonding quality of the isocyanate adhesive used in this study.

Conclusion

Black spruce has a good potential in the finger-jointing with isocyanate adhesive for structural applications. The curing time and end pressure of structural finger-joints have a significant influence on ultimate tensile strength. The maximum curing time effect takes place between 2 and 5 hours at room temperature. After 1 or 2 hours of curing time at room temperature, finger-joints could reach more than 70 percent of reference strength achieved at 24 hours of curing time. After 5 hours of curing time, finger-joints achieve the same level as the reference ultimate tensile strength. On the other hand, an end pressure of 3.43 MPa (498 psi) was found to be the optimum condition for assembling finger-joined black spruce with isocyanate adhesive. The tensile strength of all finger-joints fabricated using various curing times and end pressure treatments met the tensile strength requirements outlined in the SPS 1-2000 (NLGA 2000b) for structural lumber. The results have also shown that finger-joints of high tensile performance can be produced using the type of isocyanate adhesive studied.
Table 1. -- Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of finger-joined black
Spruce wood as determined from tension tests with different curing
times.

 Curing time
 Statistical parameter 1 hr. 2 hr. 5 hr. 24 hr.
Mean (MPa) 25.9 A (a) 26.9 A 32.5 B 35.2 B
SD (MPa) (b) 3.3 2.4 3.5 3.8
Sample size 15 14 12 16

 SPS 1-2000
 Proofload tension
 Statistical parameter stress level

Mean (MPa) 6.8
SD (MPa) (b) --
Sample size --

(a) Means within a row followed by the same capital letter are not
significantly different at the 5 percent probability level.
(b) SD = standard deviation.

Table 2. -- Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of finger-joined black
Spruce wood as determined from tension tests with different end
Pressure levels.
 End pressure (MPa)

 1.3 2.2 2.8 3.7 4.0 4.9

Mean (MPa) 26.6 C (a) 31.1 ABC 30.4 ABC 35.2 A 33.6 AB 29.2 BC
SD (MPa) 5.0 4.2 5.7 3.8 4.6 4.4
Sample size 15 15 15 16 14 14

 SPS 1-2000
 Proofload tension stress level

Mean (MPa) 6.8
SD (MPa) --
Sample size --

(a) Means within a row followed by the same capital letter are not
significantly different at the 5 percent probability level.
(b) SD = standard deviation.


[c]Forest Products Society 2003.

Forest Prod. J. 53(11/12):85-89.

Literature cited

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1995. Standard test methods for specific gravity of wood and wood-base materials. ASTM D 2395-93. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. pp. 348-355.

___________. 1997a. Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes. D 198-99. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. pp. 57-75.

___________. 1997b. Standard test methods for evaluating adhesives for finger jointing lumber. ASTM D 4688. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. pp. 373-379.

Ayarkwa, J., Y. Hirashima, and Y. Sasaki. 2000. Effect of finger geometry and end pressure on the flexural properties of finger-jointed tropical African hardwoods. Forest Prod. J. 50(11/12):53-63.

Bustos, C., R. Beauregard, M. Mohammad, and R.E. Hernandez. 2003. Structural performance of finger-joined black spruce wood lumber with different joint configurations. Forest Prod. J. 53(9):72-76.

Centre Technique du Bois (CTBA). 1973. Technical and economic study of finger-jointing. Book No. 92. Paris, France. 48 pp. (in French).

Chen, G. 2001. Two-part polyurethane adhesive for structural finger joints. Industrial applications of isocyanates and polyurethanes. In: Proc. The Wood Adhesives 2000 Symposium. Section 2A: Industrial applications of isocyanates and polyurethanes. Forest Prod. Soc., Madison, WI. pp. 15-16.

___________. 2002. Personal communication. Corporate research and technology innovation dept., Ashland Specialty Chemical Co., Ajax, Ontario, Canada.

Dawe, P.S. 1965. Strength of finger-joints. Paper presented at the Inter. Symp. on Joints in Timber Structures. Timber Research and Dev. Assoc., London, UK. 9 pp.

Deutsches Institut fuer Normung (DIN). 1971. Wood joints: Dovetail joints as longitudinal joints. DIN 68 140. DIN, Berlin, Germany. Cited by Jokerst (1981).

Ebewele, R., B. River, and J. Koutsky. 1979. Tapered double cantilever beam fracture tests of phenolic-wood adhesive joints. Part I. Development of specimen geometry; effects of bondline thickness, wood anisotropy and cure time on fracture energy. Wood Fiber 11(3):197-213.

Groom, L.H., and R.J. Leichti. 1994. Effect of adhesive stiffness and thickness on stress distributions in structural finger joints. J. Adhesion 44:69-83.

Jokerst, R.W. 1981. Finger-jointed wood products. Res. Paper FPL 382. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI. 23 pp.

Juvonen, R. 1980. End pressure for finger-jointing. In: Proc. of Production, Marketing and Use of Finger-jointed Sawnwood. C.F.L. Prins, ed. Timber Committee of the UN Economic Commission for Europe. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, Boston, London. pp. 181-189.

King, T. and G. Chen. 2001. Adhesive and wood. Specialty Wood J. 4(6):14-18.

Kutscha, P. and R.W. Caster. 1987. Factors affecting the bond quality of hem-fir finger-joints. Forest Prod. J. 37(4):43-48.

Lange, D., J.T. Fields, and S.A. Stirn. 2001. Fingerjoint application potentials for one-part polyurethanes. In: Proc. The Wood Adhesives 2000 Symposium. Section 2A: Industrial applications of isocyanates and polyurethanes. Forest Prod. Soc., Madison, WI. pp. 17-18.

Madsen, B. and T.W. Littleford. 1962. Finger joints for structural usage. Forest Prod. J. 12(2):68-73.

Marra, G. 1984. The role of adhesion and adhesives in the wood products industry. In: Adhesives for Wood. Research Applications, and Needs. R.H. Gillespie, ed. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI. pp. 2-9.

National Lumber Grading Authority (NLGA). 2000a. Standard grading rules for Canadian lumber. NLGA, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 238 pp.

___________. 2000b. Special products standard for fingerjoined structural lumber. SPS 1. NLGA, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 25 pp.

Pagel, H. F. and E.R. Luckman. 1984a. A new isocyanate containing wood adhesive. In: Wood Adhesives: Present and Future. J. of Applied Polymer Science. Applied Polymer Symposium 40. A. Pizzi, ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. pp. 191-202.

___________ and __________. 1984b. EPI--a new structural adhesive. In: Adhesives for Wood; Research, Applications, and Needs. R.H. Gillespie, ed. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI. pp. 139-149.

Raknes, E. 1982. The influence of production conditions on the strength of finger-joints. In: Proc. Production, Marketing and Use of Finger-jointed Sawnwood. C.F.L. Prins, ed. Timber Committee of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Martinus Nijhof/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands. pp. 154-168.

River, B. 1994. Fracture of adhesive-bonded wood joints. In: Handbook of Adhesive Technology. Pizzi and Mitall, eds. pp. 151-177.

Sandoz, J. 1984. Study of stress dispersion in finger-jointed wood. Work placement research conducted at the Federal Polytechnical School of Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. 75 pp. (in French).

SAS Institute. 1998. SAS/Stat users guide, release 6.03 Ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.

Strickler, M.D. 1980. Finger-jointed dimension lumber--past, present, and future. Forest Prod. J. 30(9):51-56.

Verreault, C. 1999. Performance evaluation of green gluing for finger jointing. Internal Rept., CFS-VA No. 2295. Forintek Canada Corp., Ste-foy, QC, Canada. 59 pp.

The authors are, respectively, PhD Student, Dept. of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval Univ., Quebec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4; Research Scientist, Forintek Canada Corp., Quebec, QC, Canada G1P 4R4; Professor and Associate Professor, Dept. of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval Univ., Quebec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4. The authors wish to thank the technicians from the Dept. of Wood and Forest Sciences at Laval University, as well as those from the Value Added Program and Building Systems Department at Forintek Canada Corp. for their technical support. Acknowledgment is also made to the Canadian Forest Service for their financial support, and to the Bio-Bio University, Concepcion, Chile, as well as Ashland Adhesives, for their valuable support. This paper was received for publication in May 2002. Article No. 9497.

*Forest Products Society Member.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Forest Products Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Bustos, Cecilia; Mohammad, Mohammad; Hernandez, Roger E.; Beauregard, Robert
Publication:Forest Products Journal
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2003
Words:4091
Previous Article:Simulating an extra grader in a sawmill.
Next Article:Accelerated detection of brown-rot decay: Comparison of soil block test, chemical analysis, mechanical properties, and immunodetection.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters