Printer Friendly

Effect of salt stress on physiological and morphological parameters of rapeseed cultivars.


Abiotic stresses such as salt excess (NaCl) and drought are among factors most limiting to plant productivity [2,6,7]. High salinity in soil or irrigation water is a common environmental problem affecting plant growth and productivity by provoking osmotic stress and ion toxicity together with induction of oxidative stress. There is an increasing body of evidence which suggests that together with osmotic adjustment and ion compartmentalization, an efficient antioxidant system is also important in combating salinity stress. Results have indicated that salinity affects growth and development of plants through oxidative, osmotic and ionic stresses. Because of accumulated salts in soil under salt stress condition plant wilts apparently while soil salts such as Na+ and [Cl.sup.-] disrupt normal growth and development of plant [9, 25, 38]. Salt tolerance of wheat cultivars have a direct relationship with [Na.sup.+]/[K.sup.+] ratio so that the ratio increased with the increase of salinity level but less increase is observed in tolerant cultivars, they concluded that [Na.sup.+]/[K.sup.+] ratio can be a measure of salt stress tolerance [10, 26].

One of the biochemical changes occurring when plants are subjected to biotic or abiotic stresses is the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [24]. ROS are highly reactive and in the absence of any protective mechanism they can seriously disrupt normal metabolism through oxidative damage to lipids, protein and nucleic acids. In order to avoid the production of these reactive molecules plants have evolved an effective scavenging system involving antioxidant molecules like carotenoids, ascorbate, glutathione and tocopherols as well as antioxidant enzymes such as super oxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as the decomposition product of polyunsaturated fatty acids of biomembranes, showed greater accumulation under salt stress [23, 25]. Cell membrane stability has been widely used to differentiate stress tolerant and susceptible cultivars of some crops and and in some cases higher membrane stability and prolin content could be correlated with abiotic stress tolerance [27, 28].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of salt stress on the activity of antioxidative enzymes; the lipid membrane peroxidation; the prolin content and the [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] content in four rape seed cultivars, in order to better understand their differences on salt stress tolerance.

Material and methods

Plant material:

A research was carried out to evolution effect of salt stress on physiological and morphological parameters of four rapeseed cultivars, Slm04, Opera, Zarfam and Modena in University of Tehran and Islamic Azad University (Shoushtar Branch) in 2010. Salt stress treatments were applied using salt solutions with EC values of 0.6 (control), 4 and 8 ds/[m.sup.-1]. These solutions were called S0, S1 and S2 respectively. Required amount of each solid salt for preparing one liter salt solution was calculated through the following formula first [1]:

TDS (mg/lit) = EC x 640

Where: TDS= total soluble solid salt amount (mg/lit)

EC= given electro conductivity value (ds/m)

Then EC value of each solution was read by means of EC meter and reached the desirable EC with addition of solid salt or distilled water. 10 Seeds of each cultivar were sown in germination boxes filled with perlite. The germination boxes were placed greenhouse where temperature ranged between 22[degrees]C and 25[degrees]C for a period of 3 weeks. The boxes irrigated daily with three different Hoagland solutions by the use of NaCl. Electrical conductivities (EC) at 25[degrees]C of the three salinity levels were 0.6(control), 4 and 8dS [m.sup.-1], respectively. After 21 days, plants were harvested for morphological, physiological and biochemical determinations. The layout of the experiment was a Factorial complete block Design. There were four replicates in each treatment group.

Enzyme Determinations:

For enzyme assays and estimation of lipid peroxidation, frozen leaf samples were ground to a fine powder with liquid nitrogen and extracted with ice-cold 50 nM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The extracts were centrifuged at 4[degrees]C for 30 min at 20000g and the resulting supernatants; hereafter referred to as crude extracts, was collected and used for protein content assay and enzyme activities. Protein content was determined according to Bradford [8] with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Peroxidase activity was determined using the guaiacol oxidation method [4] in a 3 ml reaction mixture containing 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.4), 8 mM guaiacol, 100-200 ml enzyme extract and 2.75 mM H2O2. The increase in absorbance was recorded at 470 nm within 30 s (linear phase) after H2O2 was added. CAT extraction was performed in a 50 mM Tris- HCl buffer. The enzyme activity was assayed by measuring the reduction of H2O2 at 240 nm and 25[degrees]C as described by Dionisio-Sese et al. [13].

Lipid peroxidation and Electrolyte leakage:

Lipid peroxidation was determined by measuring the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) formation using the thiobarbituric acid method described by Stewart and Bewley[33]. The crude extract preparation was mixed with the same volume of a 0.5% (w: v) thiobarbituric acid solution containing 20% (w: v) trichloroacetic acid. The mixture was heated at 95[degrees]C for 30 min and the reaction was stopped by quickly placing in an ice-bath. The cooled mixture was centrifuged at 10000g for 10 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant at 532 and 600 nm was read. After subtracting the nonspecific absorbance at 600 nm, the MDA concentration was determined by its extinction coefficient of 155 m[M.sup.-1] [cm.sup.-1]. [37]

To determine electrolyte leakage, 100 mg fresh leaf samples were cut into 5 mm length and placed in test tubes containing 10 ml distilled deionized water. The tubes were covered with plastic caps and placed in a water bath maintained at the constant temperature of 32[degrees]C. After 2 h the initial electrical conductivity of the medium (EC1) was measured using an electrical conductivity meter. The samples were autoclaved

afterwards at 120[degrees]C for 20 min to completely kill the tissues and release all electrolytes. Samples were then cooled to 25[degrees]C and the final electrical conductivity (EC2) was measured. The electrolyte leakage (EL) was expressed following the formula EL=EC1/EC2x 100 [32].

Proline conten:

Proline determination was carried out according to the method of Bates et al. [5].

Sodium and Potassium determination:

For the determination of sodium and Potassium in the leaf, 10 mg dried material was cut into 1 cm length, placed in test tubes containing 20 ml distilled deionized water, and heated in a boiling water bath for 1 h. The tubes were then autoclaved at 120[degrees]C for 20 min and cooled. The sodium content in 15 time's diluted extract was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry[1].

Statistical Analysis

All data were subjected to ANOVA test and means were compared by the Duncan's. Comparisons with P values B/0.05 were considered significantly different.

Results and discussion

Effect of Salinity on Growth;

Seedling Fresh and dry weight, shoot length and root length of four rapeseed cultivars subjected to 3week salinity treatments are shown in Table1. Cultivars which are considered as salt-tolerant, that is, Zarfam and Modena, showed higher Shoot length, fresh and dry weight at 4 dS [m.sup.-1] salinity level compared to the non-salt-treated plants. The salt sensitive cultivars, Slm04 and Opera, on the other hand, did not show this growth stimulation at moderate salinity level. At 8 dS [m.sup.-1] salinity level Zarfam and Modena cultivars showed higher root length, shoot length, fresh and dry weight than Opera and Slm04. In all cultivars decrease of shoot length in compared to root length was higher.

Effect of salinity on catalase and peroxidase activities

Fig. 1 and Fig.2 showed the effect of increasing level of NaCl salinity on catalase and peroxidase activities of the four rapeseed cultivars after 3 week exposure to salinity. The Results showed that salt stress decrease catalase activity in four rapeseeds cultivars but this decrease was slightly in Zarfam and Modena than other cultivars. In fact decrease of catalase in Zarfam and Modena was very slightly in compared to other cultivars (we can say catalase activity unchanged in salt tolerance rapeseeds cultivars). The salt-tolerant cultivars, Modena and Zarfam showed a increase in peroxidase activity at high salinity level, whereas the salt-sensitive cultivars, Slm04 and Opera, did not show any increase in peroxidase activity at all. In Slm04 Cultivar peroxidase activity unchang under salinity condition and in Opera Cultivar peroxidase activity decrease in compared to non salinity condition.

Effect of salinity on lipid peroxidation, Proline content and electrolyte leakage

The effect of increasing of salinity stress on MDA formation in the leaves of the four rapeseed cultivars after 3 week salinity treatment is shown in Table 2. With increasing level of salinity stress, the MDA content increased in the four cultivars, but this increase was higher in Opera and Slm04 than other cultivars. On the other hand, in Zarfam and Modena did not exhibit strongly increase in lipid peroxidation with a 3 week exposure to salinity stress. The amount of electrolyte leakage from the leaves of the four rapeseed cultivars subjected to increasing level of salinity stress is shown in Table2. Increasing of salinity stress increased the amount of electrolyte leakage from the leaves of Opera and Slm04 but this increase was slowly in Zarfam and Modena. The amount of proline from the leaves of the four rapeseed cultivars subjected to increasing level of salinity stress is shown in Table2. Salinity significantly increase proline content in all rapeseed cultivars but this increase was not significantly in Slm04 and Opera.

Effect of salinity on [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] uptake:

There was a marked varietals difference in the accumulation of [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] in rapeseed leaves in response to salinity. with increasing Stalinization, in all cultivars [Na.sup.+] was increase, but in Zarfam and Slm04 this increase were slowly than other two cultivars. With increasing Stalinization, [K.sup.+] was decrease in all cultivars, but this decrease was slowly in Zarfam Cultivar. Data showed that in Zarfam, [K.sup.+] was higher than other cultivars and Higher [K.sup.+]: [Na.sup.+] ratio showed in Zarfam than other cultivars (Table3).


Morphologically, the most typical symptom of saline injury to a plant is retarded growth due to inhibition of cell elongation [4]. In this study Salinity decrease dry and fresh weight of rapeseed seedling but this decrease was lower in salt tolerance cultivars (Table 1). Researchers reported that accumulation of salts and ions in plant growth environment causes osmotic and drought stress leading to decrease of water absorption by plant tissues. Decrease of tissue water content results in reduction of cellular growth and development. Therefore, restriction of water absorption and its consequences for cellular growth and development is one of the most important causes of decreased growth of stem and root [2,9, 12, 16, 22]. In supporting of our observation, Hernandez et al. [14] reported a dose-dependent reduction in the growth of pea plants subjected to NaCl stress. Similarly, in rice leaves, under higher saline conditions, relative growth rate was decreased in salt sensitive cultivar whereas salt tolerant cultivars exhibited no significant change [13, 28]. Data of this study showed salt stress decrease shoot and root length but this decrease was higher in shoot, especially in salt sensitive cultivars. Bandeoglu et al. [4]showed salt stress decrease root and shoot growth of lentil seedling but decrease of shoot growth was higher than root growth.



Results of the analysis of [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] percentage of leaves of rapeseed cultivars differing in salt tolerance agree with the view that there is an inverse relationship between shoot [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] concentration and salt tolerance [36,38]. The salt-tolerant cultivars Modena and Zarfam did not exhibit a significant increase in [Na.sup.+] accumulation in the leaves even at high salinity level whereas the salt-sensitive cultivars Slm04 and Opera showed pronounced accumulation. Our results showed that salt tolerant cultivars have higher [K.sup.+] concentration and [K.sup.+]: [Na.sup.+] than salt sensitive cultivars. On the other hand, this study showed composite correlation between increase of [K.sup.+] and decrease of Na+ with growth of rapeseed seedling. Ashraf and McNilley [3]. showed that salt stress increase of Na+ and decrease of K+ in shoot of rapeseed and salt tolerance rapeseed have higher [K.sup.+]:[Na.sup.+] ratio than salt sensitive cultivars . Chen et al. [11] studied soybean, wheat, maize and cotton and suggested that Na+ concentration increased with the increase in salinity level in all of these plants. Root Na+ content of cotton which is a salt stress tolerant plant was more than soybean root indicating preservation of [Na.sup.+] in cotton root and lack of Na+ transportation to shoot. Data of this study showed negative correlation between [Na.sup.+] concentrations in shoot of rapeseeds cultivars with MAD concentration and electrolyte leakage and positive correlation between [K.sup.+] concentration and these parameters.

Researchers suggested that [K.sup.+] concentration observed in salt stress tolerant plants were more than that of susceptible cultivars led to decreased [Na.sup.+] toxicity. Increased Na+ content led to decrease in seed germination level and seedling fresh weight in such plants [10, 11,32, 34, 35, 38, 40, 41,42,43]. Morant et al. [21] working on Triticale cultivars suggested that [K.sup.+]:[Na.sup.+] ratio decreased with the increase in salt stress level in growth environment in all of investigated cultivars, however, more increase value was observed among salt stress susceptible plants and reported decreased [K.sup.+] absorption in presence of NaCl as the cause of this observation.

Proline is one of the most important osmoprotectant in plants. Under salt stress most plant species exhibit a remarkable increase in their proline content [4, 12, 16,17]. In our experiments we also observed a similar behavior in the seedling of rapeseeds. Supporting findings come from other plants [35, 3] where salt stress resulted in extensive proline accumulation. In support of our observations, recently in rice roots exposed to NaCl stress, a uniform accumulation of proline was shown to be related with increasing NaCl concentrations [15, 21, 39].

The extent of damage to the membrane was monitored by measuring the amount of MDA produced when polyunsaturated fatty acids in the membrane undergo peroxidation. Membrane structure and properties, this enhanced free radical formation and lipid peroxidation under salt stress in salt-sensitive cultivars may have also brought about an increase in membrane permeability or loss of membrane integrity, as evidenced by the increase in solute leakage (Table 2). Salt stress-induced electrolyte leakage has also been previously observed in foxital millet [32].

An increase in MDA contents upon salt stress has been reported in different plant species [13, 16, 29, 34]. This increase was shown to be related to the amount of stress and well correlated with lipid membrane damage. Our results also demonstrated a marked increase in MDA content in leaves of rapeseeds seedlings but this increase were higher in salt sensitive cultivars. Valentovic et al. [37] showed salinity increase MAD content in corn salt sensitive cultivar but in tolerant cultivar, MAD unchanched. Mansour [19] reported that application of proline prior to salt stress protected plasma membranes of onion cells form stress mediated oxidative damage. Therefore, a higher percentage of increase in proline content and a lower extent of increase in MDA levels of seedling tissues as observed in our study was most probably the possible explanation of a reduced membrane damage of seedling tissues under salinity stress. Data of this study showed positive correlation between low of electrolyte leakage and MDA content with seedling dry weight (data don't show).

Various researchers dealing with plants [30, 39,] have also reported increase in antioxidant enzyme like as peroxidase (POD), super oxide dismutaz (SOD)and catalase activity in salt-tolerance cultivars under salt stress. In tolerant plant species, POD activity was found to be higher, enabling plants to protect themselves against the oxidative stress whereas such activity was not observed in sensitive plants [31]. In the present study, the POD activity significantly increased in Zarfam and Modena but remained unchanged in Slm04 and decrease in Opera. On the other hand, The salt-induced enhancement of POD activity in salt tolerant cultivars indicated that it had a higher capacity for the scavenge ROS. Data of this study showed positive correlation between peroxidase activity and low of MAD. Study of Bandeoglu et al. [4]on Lentil showed under salt stress increase of peroxidase enzyme decrease effect of salt stress on growth of lentil seedling but activity of catalase decrease under salt stress in lentil. Meloni et al. [20] showed under salinity, antioxidant enzyme like as peroxidase increase in salt tolerant cotton variety but in salt sensitive variety peroxidase activity was lower than salt tolerance variety. Increase in peroxidase in salt tolerant variety led to increase of photosynthesis of cotton in compared to salt sensitive variety. Conversely, as observed in this study, in potato rice [18]. Catalase activity did not change under salt stress. Neto et al. [24] showed salt stress reduced catalase activity of corn sensitive cultivar but did not effect on catalase activity of corn resistance cultivar. They suggested that catalase was sensitive antioxidant enzyme in compared to other enzymes such as peroxidase and super oxide desmutase under stress condition.

In conclusion, this study showed that the difference of antioxidant enzyme activities and ion content in the four cultivars could be described to the difference in mechanisms underlying salt stress injury and subsequent tolerance to salinity. Notably Zarfam and Modena cultivars, which exhibited higher salt tolerance, had also higher antioxidant enzyme activity and K+:Na+ ratio than Modena and Opera. Data obtained of this study indicated that the relative NaCl stress tolerance of Zarfam and Modena may be due to a lower rate of peroxidation of its lipids and a higher constitutive activity of antioxidant enzymes. These results confirm that the scavenging system forms the primary defense line in protecting the plant tissue against ROS in rapeseed. MDA is produced when polyunsaturated fatty acids in the membrane undergo peroxidation. The results reported here show that the degree of accumulation of MDA was higher in Opera and Slm04 than in Zarfam and Modena, indicating a high rate of lipid peroxidation in Opera and Slm04 due to salt stress. The lesser degree of membrane damage (as indicated by low MDA content and electrolyte leakage) and the higher activity of peroxidase and catalase observed in NaCl treated plants of Zarfam and Modena indicated that these rapeseed cultivars had a higher capacity for the tolerant salinity in comparison with sensitive cultivars.


[1.] Al-Ansari, F., 2002. Salinity tolerance during germination in two arid-land cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Seed Science and Technology, 31(3): 125-129.

[2.] Ashraf, M. and T. Mecneilly, 1988. Variability in salt tolerance of nine spring wheat cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 160: 14-21.

[3.] Ashraf, M. and T. McNilley, 2004. Salinity tolerance in Barcia oil seeds. Plant Science, 23 (2): 157-172.

[4.] Bandeoglu1, E., F. Eyidogan, M. Yucel, H. and A. Oktem, 2004. Antioxidant responses of shoots and roots of lentil to NaCl-salinity stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 42: 69-77.

[5.] Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldren, ID. Teare, 1977. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205-207.

[6.] Bayuelo-Jimenez, J.S. and D.G. Deboulk, 2003. Growth, gas exchange whater relations and ion composition of phasylous voulgaris under salin condition. Field Crop Research, 80: 207-222.

[7.] Bohnert H.J., D.E. Nelson, R.G. Jensen, 1995. Adaptations to environmental stresses. The Plant Cell, 7: 1099-1111.

[8.] Bradford M.N., 1976. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Annual of Biochemistry, 72: 248-254.

[9.] Cavalcanti F., J.P. Lima, S. Silva, R. Viegas and J. Silveria, 2007. Roots and leaves display contrasting oxidative response during salt stress and recovery in cowpea. Journal of Plant Physiology, 164: 591-600.

[10.] Chen K., G. Hu, N. Keutgen, M.J.J. Janssens and F. Lenz, 1999. Effects of NaCl salinity and CO2 enrichment on pepino (Solanum muricatum). II. Leaf photosynthetic properties and gas-exchange. Sci. Horticulturae, 81: 43-56.

[11.] Chen, D., D.M Yu-Renpei, D.M. Yu., 1996. Studies of relative salt tolerance of crops. Salt tolerance of some main crop species, Acta pedologica science, 33: 121-128.

[12.] Delauney A.J. and D.P.S. Verma. 1993, Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant Journal, 4: 215-223.

[13.] Dionisio-Sese M.L. and S. Tobita. 1998, Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Science, 135: 1-9.

[14.] Hernandez, J.A. A. Campillo, A. Jimenez, J.J.F. Alarcon, 1999 Sevilla. Responses of antioxidant systems and leaf water relations to NaCl stress in pea plants. New Phytolology, 141: 241-251.

[15.] Khan, M.H., K.L.B. Singha, S.K. Panda, 2002. Changes in antioxidant levels in Oryza sativa L. roots subjected to NaCl salinity stress. Acta Physiol. Plant, 24: 145-148.

[16.] Lee, D.H., Y.S. Kim, C.B. Lee, 2001. The inductive responses of antioxidant enzymes by salt stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Plant Physiology, 158: 737-745.

[17.] Lee, TMand Y.H. Lin, 1995. Changes in soluble and cell wallbound of mulberry (Morus alba L.) under NaCl salinity. Plant Science, 161: 613-619.

[18.] Lin, C.C., C.H. Kao, 2000. Effect of NaCl on H2O2 metabolism in rice leaves. Plant Growth Regul, 30: 151-155.

[19.] Mansour, M.M.F., 1998. Protection of plasma membrane of onion epidermal cells by glycinebetaine and proline against NaCl stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem, 36: 767-772.

[20.] Meloni, D.A., A. Marco, A, Carlos, 2003. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase,peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 49: 69-76.

[21.] Morant, M.A., E. Pradier, G. Tremblin, 2004. Osmotic adjustment, gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of a hexaploid triticale and its parental species under salt stress. Plant physiology, 161(1): 25-33.

[22.] Munns, R., 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant cell and environment, 25: 239-250.

[23.] Neill, S., R. Desikan, J. Hancook, 2002. Hydrojen peroxide signaling. Plant Biology, 5: 383-395.

[24.] Neto, A., J. Prisco, J. Fillo, C. Aberu and E. Filho, 2006. Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt tolerant and salt sensitive maize genotypes. Enviromental and Experimental Botany, 56: 87-94.

[25.] Noble, C.L. and M.E. Rogers, 1992. Arguments for the use of physiological criteria for improving the salt tolerance in crops. Plant Soil, 146: 99-107.

[26.] Poustini, K. and A.Siosemardeh, 2004. Ion distribution in wheat cultivars in response to salinity stress. Filed Crop Reserch, 85: 125-133.

[27.] Premachandra, G.S., H. Saneoka, K. Fujita , S. Ogata, 1992. Leaf water relations, osmotic adjustment, cell membrane stability, epi-cuticular wax load and growth as affected by increasing water deficits in Sorghum. Journal of Experiment of Botany, 43: 1569- 1576.

[28.] Rout, N.P. and B.P. Shaw, 2001. Salt tolerance in aquatic macrophytes: possible involvement of the antioxidative enzymes. Plant Science, 160: 415-423.

[29.] Sairam, R.K. and G.C. Srivastava, 2002. Changes in antioxidant activity in sub-cellular fractions of tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to long term salt stress. Plant Science, 162: 897-904.

[30.] Sanatos, C.L., A. Campose, H. Azevedo, G. Calderio, 2003. In situ and in vitro senescence induced by KCL stress: nutritional imbalance, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52(3): 351-360.

[31.] Scalet, M., R. Federice, M.C. Guido and F. Manes, 1995. Peroxidase activity and polyamine changes in response to ozone and simulated acid rain in Aleppo pine needles. Environ. Exp. Bot., 35: 417-425.

[32.] Sreenivasulu, N., B. Grimm and U. Wobus, 2002. Differential respons of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt tolerant and salt sensitive seedling of foxital millet (setaria italica). Physiological Plantarum, 109: 435-442.

[33.] Stewart, R.C. and J.D. Bewley, 1980. Lipid peroxidation associated with accelerated aging of soybean axes. Plant Physiology, 65: 245-248.

[34.] Sudhakar, C., A. Lakshmi S. Giridarakumar, 1992. Changes in the antioxidant enzyme efficacy in two high yielding genotypes of mulberry (Morus alba L.) under NaCl salinity. Plant Science, 161: 613-619.

[35.] Tramontano, W.A. and D. Jouve, 1997. Trigonelline accumulation in salt stressed legumes and the role of other osmoregulators as cell cycle control agents. Photochemistry, 44: 1037-1040.

[36.] Umezawa, T., K. Shimizu and M. Kato, 2004. Enhancement of salt tolerance in soybean with NaCl pretreatment. Physiology Plantarum, 110: 59-63.

[37.] Valentovic, M., M. Luxova and L. Kolarovic,2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solute cntent, memberance stability and relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil Enviroment, 52(4): 186-191.

[38.] Yeo, A.R. and T.J. Flowers, 1983. Varietal differences in the toxicity of sodium ions in rice leaves. Physiol. Plant, 59: 189-195.

[39.] Zhu, D. and J. Seandalious, 1994, Differential accumulation of Mn- SOD transcription in maize in response to ABA and high osmoticum. Plant Physiology, 106: 173-178.

[40.] Maziah, M., Z. Abdul Rahman, H. Mohd, S.Z. Shamsuddin, and S. Subramaniam, 2009 Responses of Banana Plantlets to Rhizobacteria noculation under Salt Stress Condition, Am.-Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric., 3(3): 290-30

[41.] Sadeghi, H., 2009. Effects of Different Levels of Sodium Chloride on Yield and Chemical Composition in Two Barley Cultivars, Am.-Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric., 3(3): 314-320,

[42.] Rahimi, A and A. Biglarifard, 2011. Impacts of NaCl Stress on Proline, Soluble Sugars, Photosynthetic Pigments and Chlorophyll Florescence of Strawberry. Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(4): 617-623.

[43.] Mahmoodabad, R.Z., S.J. Somarin, M. Khayatnezhad and R. Gholamin, The study of effect salinity stress on germination and seedling growth in five different genotypes of wheat. Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(1): 177-179.

Rozbeh Farhoudi

Department of Agronomy, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar Branch, Shoushtar, Iran

Corresponding Author

Rozbeh Farhoudi, Department of Agronomy, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar Branch, Shoushtar, Iran E-mail:
Table1: Effect of salt stress on seedling growth of four rapeseed

                           Shoot           Root
Salt level    Cultivar     length(cm)      length(cm)

S0            Slm04        6.75 a          11.3 a
              Opera        6.50 a          11.1 a
              Modena       6.60 a          11.2 a
              Zarfam       6.90 a          11.3 a

S1            Slm04        5.10 c          8.10 c
              Opera        5.10 c          8.30 c
              Modena       6.20 b          10.1 b
              Zarfam       6.30 b          10.2 b

S2            Slm04        3.70 d          6.20 d
              Opera        3.70 d          6.30 d
              Modena       5.20 c          9.20 b
              Zarfam       5.30 c          9.10 b

                           Seedling        Seedling
Salt level    Cultivar     FW(mg) *        DW(mg) *

S0            Slm04        230.8 a         24.2 a
              Opera        228.0 a         22.4 a
              Modena       226.7 a         23.7 a
              Zarfam       228.7 a         23.8 a

S1            Slm04        165.2 c         18.2 c
              Opera        161.2 c         18.9 c
              Modena       180.3 b         20.2 b
              Zarfam       181.1 b         20.1 b

S2            Slm04        90.3 e          14.3 e
              Opera        92.4 e          14.7 d
              Modena       134.7 d         16.7 d
              Zarfam       137.3 d         17.0 d

* FW: Fresh Weight

** DW: Dry Weight

Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly
different at P = 0.01 according to Duncan test

Table 2: Effect of salt stress on some physiological trait of four
rapeseed cultivars

                        Proline       MAD           Electrolyte
Salt level   Cultivar   (mg/grfw)     (nmol/grfw)   leakage(%)

S0           Slm04      22.7 a        4.7 a         8.30 a
             Opera      21.8 a        4.9 a         9.10 a
             Modena     20.9 a        5.1 a         8.20 a
             Zarfam     22.6 a        4.4 a         8.70 a

S1           Slm04      23.4 a        8.2 b         15.3 b
             Opera      21.6 a        9.0 c         16.1 b
             Modena     32.9 b        6.1 b         9.80 a
             Zarfam     31.8 b        5.8 a         10.10 a

S2           Slm04      27.2 a        12.1 d        38.80 c
             Opera      22.7 a        11.4 d        37.0 c
             Modena     50.23 c       6.6 c         14.10 b
             Zarfam     51.0 c        6.3 c         15.00 b

Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly
different at P = 0.01 according to Duncan test

Table 3: Effect of salt stress on shoot [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+]
percentage of rapeseed cultivars

                         [Na.sup.+]    [K.sup.+]    [Na.sup.+]
Salt level    Cultivar   %             %            ratio

S0            Slm04      3.6 c         10.6 a       2.9 a
              Opera      3.2 c         10.9 a       3.2 a
              Modena     3.4 c         10.5 a       3.1 a
              Zarfam     3.4 c         10.7 a       3.1 a

S1            Slm04      4.4 b         8.4 c        1.9 c
              Opera      4.4 b         8.2 c        1.8 c
              Modena     4.1 b         9.1 b        2.2 b
              Zarfam     3.8 c         9.4 b        2.4 b

S2            Slm04      5.9 a         6.1 d        1.3 e
              Opera      5.7 a         6.3 d        1.1 e
              Modena     4.9 b         8.1 c        1.6 d
              Zarfam     4.6 b         8.2 c        1.9 c

Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different
at P = 0.01 according to Duncan test
COPYRIGHT 2011 American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Farhoudi, Rozbeh
Publication:Advances in Environmental Biology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:7IRAN
Date:Jul 1, 2011
Previous Article:Different densities of weeds and wild oats (Avena ludoviciana) and canary grass (Phalaris minor) on yield and yield components of wheat cultivar...
Next Article:Exploratory factor analysis on state intervention policies to boost rice production.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters