Effect of phototherapy on hypocalcemia.
Due to immaturity of the bilirubin metabolism approximately 60% of term new borns and 80% of preterms (1) develop jaundice in the first week of life. A very small proportion of babies may show significant jaundice, hence no intervention is required. Among them about 5-10% may require active intervention interms of phototherapy management which may be mandatory in such cases.
Jaundice is mainly due to immaturity in bilirubin metabolism resulting in imbalance between bilirubin production and elimination. Jaundice usually appear after 24 hours i.e between 24-72 hours of age. Due to physiologic immaturity premature babies are at a higher risk of developing hyperbilirubinemia.
The commonly known side effects of phototherapy are loose stools, hyperthermia, dehydration fluid loss, skin burn, photoretinitis, low platelet count, increased red cell osmotic fragility, bronze baby syndrome, riboflavin deficiency and DNA damage. (1,2) A lesser known side effect, but potential complication of phototherapy is hypocalcemia^ (Hunter,2004).
Neonatal hypocalcemia is defined as total serum calcium concentration of <7mg/dl or ionized calcium concentration of < 4mg/dl (<1mol/L). Ionized calcium is important in biochemical processes like blood coagulation, neuromuscular excitability, cell membrane integrity and function, and cellular enzymatic and secretory activity.
Romagnoli et al (1979) for the first time suggested the association of hypocalcemia with phototherapy in preterm newborns. Similarly Hakanson& Bergstrom (1981) documented this observation in newborn rats. There are few studies on hypocalcaemic effect of phototherapy (Tan, 1991; Sethi et al, 1993; Hakanson & Bergstrom, 1981).
Hence, the present study was carried out to evaluate the ionized serum calcium level in newborns who had undergone phototherapy.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: An observational study was done in Department of Pediatrics, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, and Bangalore during the period December -2014 and January 2015. All the pre terms and terms requiring photo therapy were enrolled in the study. Among the 50 babies requiring photo therapy 37 were terms and 13 were pre-terms(less than 34 weeks). Among them 24 were males and 26 were females. Among the 50, 29, 1, 5, 15 neonates were admitted day-1, day -2, day-3, day-4 respectively. Among them 23 were SGA babies and the rest were AGA babies. Neonates who were at risk of hypocalcaemia such as neonatal asphyxia, respiratory distress, sepsis, infant of diabetic mother and maternal consumption of anticonvulsant were excluded. Serum calcium were measured pre and post phototherapy. Duration of phototheraphy was ranging from 24 to 48 hours.
RESULTS: Among 50 children 40 children developed hypocalcemia post phototherapy and were treated with iv calcium. 11 were preterms and remaining 29 were term babies it was also noticed that longer the duration of phototherapy more severe the hypocalcemia.
Variable Mean & Number (Percentage) N=198 Sex (male/female) (%) 24/26 (%) =0.92 Term to Preterm ratio 37:13 Age at the onset of 29:50 hyperbilirubinemia (hrs) AGA: SGA 27:23 Type of phototheraphy TSP 6 DSP 44
DISCUSSIONS: The regulation of calcium homeostasis in the newborn period has been of considerable interest.
At birth, the plasma calcium (Ca) level in cordblood exceeds that in maternal blood. During the early days of life, the plasma Ca level progressively decreases in normal infants, so by the second or third day of life, the level is lower than that found in older infants and children. In most normal full-term infants the plasma Ca level returns to normal by 10 days of life. (4)
Phototherapy is an appropriate and safe measure to reduce indirect bilirubin level in newborns.
Roming et al was the first to suggest the association of hypocalcaemia in newborn following phototherapy. (5)
The mechanism of hypocalcaemic effect of phototherapy was reported by inhibition of pinealgland via transcranial illumination, resulting to decline of melatonin secretion; which blocks the effect of cortisol on bone calcium. Cortisol has a direct hypocalcemic effect and increases bone uptake of calcium and induces hypocalcaemia. (6)
In our term neonatal study population receiving 48 hours of phototherapy, a significant decrease in serum calcium was observed. (p <0.03).
However, only 15 neonates (7.5%) developed hypocalcaemia below the acceptable threshold after 48 hours of phototherapy. Nevertheless none of our newborns had symptomatic hypocalcaemia. In another Iranian study, between 7%--15% of term newborn receiving phototherapy developed hypocalcaemia. Alizade et al reported only ten.
(7%) newborns (4.2% females, 10.4% males) developing hypocalcaemia after 48 hours of phototherapy. Ehsanipoor et al (7) and Karamifar et al (8) reported 15% and 8.7% hypocalcaemia respectively in newborns receiving phototherapy. However the reported prevalence of hypocalcaemia in other countries was more than Iranian newborn reports. Yadavs (9) reported 66% and Jain et al(10) also observed hypocalcaemic effect of phototherapy in 30%term and 55% preterm neonates. Sethi et al has studied the effect of phototherapy in 20 term and 20 preterm hyperblirubinemic neonates. They observed hypocalcaemia in 75% of term and 90% of preterm neonates after phototherapy. (11)
Similarly, in 2006, Medhat from Cairo University observed 75% of term and 90% of preterm developed hypocalcaemia after phototherapy.(12) Observation of the present study and another Iranian study is much lower than the above-mentioned studies from other countries.
The reason for this difference is not clear. However the type of fluorescent tube, serum vitamin D, bilirubin levels and also the patient's skin color may play a role. Muta et al reported a significant difference in the serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels between newborns suffering from hyperbilirubinemia and control groups. (13)In a study done by Jain, the prevalence of hypocalcaemia was higher in newborns with higher concentration of serum bilirubin. (14) Inaddition it might also be due to the fact that this study examined total serum calcium and not ionized calcium. Ionized calcium is the active component which is kept under control by the various physiological mechanisms involved in calcium homeostasis. Albumin and pH may influence the distribution of total serum calcium level, either bound or free and ionized calcium. Then, it can be considered one of the limitations of our study.
These findings justify further prospective studies in infants that would include concurrent measurements of ionized calcium and serum 25 (OH) vitamin D. Some reports recommend prescription of calcium to prevent early onset hypocalcaemia in premature newborns. Other similar advices are observed in sick infants of diabetic mothers and those with severe prenatal asphyxia.(15)
In conclusion, although phototherapy induces hypocalcaemia in term infants, but the incidence of phototherapy associated hypocalcaemia is not too high. There is a need to check of calcium level in symptomatic newborns that have suggested hypocalcaemia signs.
(1.) Rennie, J., et al., Neonatal jaundice: summary of NICE guidance. British Medical Journal 2010; 340: 240-2499.
(2.) Kliegman M. The fetus and the neonatal infant, in: Behrman R, Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 19thed. Saunders, Philadelphia 2011; 603-612.
(3.) Xiong, T., et al., The side effects of phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: what do we know? What should we do?. European Journal of Pediatrics2011; 170: 1247-1255.
(4.) Romagnoli, C., et al., Phototherapy-induced hypocalcemia. Journal of Pediatrics 1979; 94: 815816.
(5.) Alizadeh-Taheri, P., N. Sajjadian, and B. Eivazzadeh, Prevalence of phototherapy induced hypocalcemia in term neonate. Iran Journal Pediatrics 2013; 23: 710-718.
(6.) Altirkawi, K. and H.J. Rozycki, Hypocalcemiais common in the first 48 h of life in ELBW infants. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2008; 36: 348-353.
(7.) Ehsanipour F, Khosravi N, Jalali S. The Effect of Phototherapy-Induced Hypocalcemia in Icteric Newborns. Iran University of Medical Science Journal. 2008; 15: 25-29
(8.) Karamifar H, Pishva N, Amirhakimi GH. Prevalence of Phototherapy-Induced Hypocalcemia. Iran University of Medical ScienceJournal 2002; 27:169-171.
(9.) Yadav RK, Sethi RS, Sethi AS. The evaluation of the effect of phototherapy on serum calciumlevel. People's Journal Science Research 2012; 5: 1-4.
(10.) Jain, B.K., et al., Phototherapy inducedhypocalcemia. Indian Pediatrics 1998; 35: 566-567.
(11.) Sethi, H., A. Saili, and A.K. Dutta, Phototherapy induced hypocalcemia. Indian Pediatrics 1993; 30: 1403-1406.
(12.) Medhat FB: Assessment of phototherapy induced hypocalcaemia. Thesis submitted for M.Sc. Pediatrics in Cairo University. Classification Number 8461; 2006.
(13.) M Mutlu, AC ayir, Y Cayir, B Ozkan, Y Aslan. Vitamin D and Hyperbilirubinaemia in Neonates. Hong Kong Journal of Paediatrics 2013; 18:77-81.
(14.) Jain, B.K., et al., Hypocalcemic effect of phototherapy--reply. Indian Pediatrics 1999; 36: 208209.
(15.) Jain, A., et al., Hypocalcemia in the new born. Indian Journal Pediatrics 2010; 77: 1123-1128.
Srinivasa S , Renukananda S , Srividya G. S 
[1.] Srinivasa S.
[2.] Renukananda S.
[3.] Srividya G. S.
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
[1.] Professor & HOD, Department of Paediatrics, KIMSH, Bangalore.
[2.] Post Graduate, Department of Paediatrics, KIMSH, Bangalore.
[3.] Post Graduate, Department of Paediatrics, KIMSH, Bangalore.
FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Renukananda S, Post Graduate, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore.
Date of Submission: 25/02/2015.
Date of Peer Review: 26/02/2015.
Date of Acceptance: 10/03/2015.
Date of Publishing: 20/03/2015.
Graph 1 hypocalcemia hypocalcemia 40 others 10 Note: Table made from pie chart.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ORIGINAL ARTICLE|
|Author:||Srinivasa, S.; Renukananda, S.; Srividya, G.S.|
|Publication:||Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences|
|Date:||Mar 23, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Acute chloroquine poisoning: a case report.|
|Next Article:||Role of environmental factors in non asphyxial renal failure in NICU.|