Printer Friendly

Effect of inoculants and storage temperature on the microbial, chemical and mycotoxin composition of corn silage.

INTRODUCTION

Corn is widely utilized as a ensiling material throughout the world, and corn plants in the field can be contaminated with fungi and mycotoxin formation may occur under unfavorable conditions, such as high temperature and drought stress. These fungi and mycotoxins produced can survive the ensiling process and cause animal health problems. Mycotoxins are low molecular weight secondary metabolites formed mainly by Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium species [1]. The most common mycotoxins in livestock feeds are aflatoxin [B.sub.1] (AFBj), ochratoxin A (OTA), zearalenone (ZEA) and trichothecenes. Mycotoxin contamination not only results in reduced animal feed intake, reproduction and feed conversion efficacy [2], but also may cause carcinogenesis, teratogenesis and immune system suppression as a result of chronic toxicity even at low levels [3,4]. Moreover, the presence of multiple mycotoxins is of particular concern due to potential synergistic effects on livestock exposed to moldy silage [3]. Another issue is that mycotoxins show higher resistance than mycelia to feedstuff processing and storage [5]. Thus, it is important to identify the methods for degrading or transforming mycotoxins in silage. Physical and chemical approaches, such as an addition of ammonia and adsorbents [4,6], may be dangerous to applicators. In addition, some adsorbents even bind minerals and vitamins as well as mycotoxins, reducing feed quality [7].

A few studies have indicated that mycotoxins can be degraded or transformed by some microbes. Rumen microflora can degrade and inactivate mycotoxins [8], and intestinal microbes were shown to convert ZEA to a-zearalenol and an unknown metabolite [9]. Some reduction of mycotoxins produced in the field was attributed to lactic acid bacteria (LAB) [10]; an in vitro study reported that binding of (deoxynivalenol) DON and ZEA is the major mode of action for LAB [11]. Microbial activity during silage fermentation caused the breakdown of mycotoxin ZEA [12], and Lactobacilli and Pediococcus species were reported to be able to transform some mycotoxins [13]. Mold normally grows at 10[degrees]C to 40[degrees]C, and Aspergillus and Penicillium species can grow at higher temperatures than Fusarium species [14]. However, mold growth under the optimum temperature range is not necessary for mycotoxins production. A comparison of the optimum temperature for mycotoxins formation by Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium species [15], defined the temperature range of mycotoxins production for A. flavus (AFB1), P. verrucosum (OTA) and Fusarium species (toxin T-2, DON, nivalenol [NIV] and ZEA) to be 12[degrees]C to 40[degrees]C, 4[degrees]C to 20[degrees]C, and 24[degrees]C to 26[degrees]C, respectively. To date, few studies have evaluated the effect of LAB on the stability of mycotoxins in corn silage stored at different temperatures.

Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of inoculants and storage temperature on the microbial populations, fermentation characteristics, nutritive value and mycotoxins of corn silage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Silage preparation

Corn was grown at the Zhuozhou experimental farm of China Agricultural University (Hebei Province: N 39[degrees]35'25"-39[degrees]36'05", E 115[degrees]42'12"-116[degrees]14'35", elevation 22 to 65 m, annual mean temperature 11.6[degrees]C, and annual average precipitation 554 mm). Organic matter, hydrolyzable N, available P and rapidly available K content in the field was 16,000, 89, 26.2, and 83 mg/kg, respectively. The cultivar 'Xianyu045' was established on 8 June 2016, with about 64,000 plants/hectare. A compound fertilizer (N+[P.sub.2][O.sub.5]+[K.sub.2]O [greater than or equal to]45%, 800 kg/hectare) was applied preplant, and urea (320 kg/hectare) was supplemented at the fourteenth-leaf stage on 18th July 2016. A 3x3 factorial arrangement was used in a completely randomized design. Corn was harvested at 32.8% dry matter (DM), and chopped to 1 to 2 cm with a forage chopper on 8th September 2016. The chopped forage was subjected to three treatments: i) control (distilled water, CK); ii) 1x[10.sup.6] colony forming units (cfu)/g of Lactobacillus plantarum KR107070 (LP), isolated from Chinese wild rye (Leymus chinensis) [16]; iii) 1x[10.sup.6] cfu/g of Pediococcus pentosaceus 17604 (PP), isolated from alfalfa silage. Treated forage in triplicate was ensiled in 1-L polythene jars (Hewanglan Paper and Plastic Products Factory, Beijing, China) following packing with a cylindrical rod and an axe to a density of about 800 kg of fresh weight/[m.sup.3]. Laboratory silos were stored at 20[degrees]C, 28[degrees]C, and 37[degrees]C for 55 d, respectively, with 27 silos in all.

Chemical and microbial analyses

At silo opening, corn silage mass was mixed manually prior to sampling. A subsample of 20 g was weighed into a blender jar, diluted with 180 mL of distilled water, and homogenized with a juicer for 2 min. Extracted solution was filtered through four layers of cheesecloth and one layer of qualitative filter paper, and analyzed for pH value using an electrode (PHS-3C, INESA, Shanghai, China). Then, 2 mL of filtrate was centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4[degrees]C for 5 min and reserved for fermentation acids and ammonia N (N[H.sub.3]-N) analysis. Lactic, acetic, propionic, and butyric acids were determined by high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC, SHIMADZU-10A, Kyoto, Japan). The HPLC system consisted of a Shimadzu system controller (SCL-10A), and a Shodex Rspak KC-811 S-DVB gel column (300 mmx8 mm) with a column temperature of 50[degrees]C. The mobile phase was 3 mmol HCl[O.sub.4] running at 1 mL/min, and the injection volume was 5 [micro]L. A UV detector (SPD-10A) was used for detection at 210 nm. N[H.sub.3]-N was determined by the phenol method.

A second subsample of 200 g from the ensiled forage or silage was dried in a forced-draft oven at 65[degrees]C for at least 48 h to determine DM. Neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber were determined according to Van Soest et al [17]. Water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) were determined using the anthrone method. Nitrogen was analyzed according to Kjeldahl method. Crude protein was calculated by multiplying 6.25 with N content. Ether extract (EE) was determined by petroleum ether extraction using filter bag technology. A XT4 filter bag was filled with 1 g of sample, sealed with a capper, and extracted in a X15I FAT EXTRACTOR (ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA) with petroleum ether (analytical reagent grade, 30[degrees]C to 60[degrees]C) for 1 h. Petroleum ether was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Nitrate was determined by the salicylic acid method.

The third subsample of 20 g from silage was put into a sterile triangular flask, suspended in 180 mL of sterile solution (1 g of peptone and 9 g of sodium chloride per liter), and homogenized in a laboratory oscillator at a low speed for 30 min. A series of dilute solutions were prepared for microbial count. The LAB were measured on MRS agar by incubating plates at 37[degrees]C for 2 d under anaerobic conditions. Coliform bacteria (CB) were estimated following growth on violet red bile agar incubated at 37[degrees]C for 3 d. Yeast and mold were determined on rose bengal medium after incubation at 28[degrees]C for 3 d and 5 to 7 d, respectively, with yeast and mold numbers counted separately according to their macromorphological characteristics. Bacteria and fungi were counted on the plates that yield 30 to 400 cfu and 1 to 100 cfu, respectively. All media used were obtained from Beijing Aoboxing Biotech Co., Ltd (Beijing, China).

Mycotoxins determination

Reagents and solutions: Mycotoxin standard solution NIV (100 [micro]g/mL), DON (100 [micro]g/mL), 3-acetyl-deoxynivalneol (3-ADON, 100 [micro]g/mL), AFB1 (2 [micro]g/mL), HT-2 (100 [micro]g/mL), T-2 (100 [micro]g/mL), OTA (10 [micro]g/mL), and ZEA (10 [micro]g/mL) was obtained from Romer Lab (Romer Labs Inc., Newark, NJ, USA). Diluted solutions were prepared immediately before use by diluting the standard solutions with methanol. A stock solution was composed of eight mycotoxins described above, and prepared by combining suitable aliquots of each individual standard dilution to make each mycotoxin 1 [micro]g/mL. A working solution of mycotoxin mixtures was made using a stock solution of the following concentrations: 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 ng/mL. Liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry grade methanol was purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd (Beijing, China). Acetic acid (guaranteed reagent grade) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). All reagents (analytical reagent grade) were supplied by Yanxiwan Chemical Reagent Company (Beijing, China), and 15 and 50 mL polyethylene centrifuge tubes used were purchased from Corning Inc. (Corning, NY, USA).

Extraction procedure and clean-up: For silage extracting, the QuEChERS extraction method was used [18,19], where 5 g of DM silage was weighed into a 50 mL centrifuge tube, soaked in 10 mL of 2% formic acid for 30 min, and oscillated on a rotary shaker for 30 min at 240 rpm after an addition of 10 mL of acetonitrile. Subsequently, 4 g of MgS[O.sub.4] and 1 g of NaCl were added, and the tube was capped immediately (a brief hand shaking was done immediately after an addition of salts to prevent agglomeration). The slurry was immediately oscillated for 30 s with a vortex mixer and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 5 min at 4[degrees]C, with an aim to induce phase separation and mycotoxins partitioning. Removal of residual water and cleanup were performed simultaneously by using a rapid procedure called dispersive solid-phase extraction (dispersive-SPE), where 2 mL of acetonitrile extract was mixed with 300 mg of MgS[O.sub.4] and 100 mg of [C.sub.18] endcapped silica sorbent (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a 15 mL centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 1 min at 4[degrees]C. A portion of the final solution (1 mL) was filtered to a sample bottle (Agilent Technologies, USA) by a 0.22 [micro]m syringe filter, and stored at -20[degrees]C until further analysis.

Instrumental conditions: Instrumental conditions were set according to the Agilent Mass Spectrometry (MS) Technology Products Solutions solution package (mycotoxin, 1290-6470 Parameters, Agilent Technologies, USA). An Agilent infinity 1290 ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system (Agilent Technologies, USA) was utilized throughout the study. This instrument consisted of a UHPLC pump with a built-in micro-degasser, an infinity autosampler with backflush function, and a temperature control compartment. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Agilent Eclipse Plus column (1.8 [micro]m, 100 mmx2.1 mm, Agilent Technologies, USA) at a flow rate of 300 [micro]L/min, with a mobile phase consisting of solvent A and solvent B, where solvent A was water solution containing 1% acetic acid and 5 mM ammonium acetate, and solvent B was methanol. The chromatogram of 8 mycotoxins mixed standard solution and gradient elution program are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, respectively. The injection volume of each sample was 2 [micro]L and column temperature was 40[degrees]C.

Analytes were detected using an Agilent 6470 triple quadrupole MS equipped with a Jet Stream electrospray ionization probe. MS was operated in dynamic multi-reaction monitor by monitoring two transitions (one quantifier and the other qualifier) for each analyte, with individual dwell time. MS parameters were as follows: gas temperature 300[degrees]C; sheath gas temperature 350[degrees]C; gas flow 7 L/min, sheath gas flow 11 L/min, and capillary 3,500 V, positive. The acquisition was performed in positive polarity, and the optimized MS conditions are outlined in Table 2. Linearity was established by injecting increasing concentrations (triplicates) of working solution (0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 ng/mL). Standard curves were linear in the range studied, showing correlation coefficients of >0.999. Quantification and detection limits were determined by spiked samples based on signal-to-noise ratios of 10:1 for quantification and 3:1 for detection limit.

Statistical analysis

All microbial counts (LAB, yeast, mold, and CB) were transformed to log10 units on fresh weight basis. Data of the fermentation characteristics, microbial populations, nutritive value and mycotoxin content in silage were analyzed by the Factorial Design model of SAS (9.1 version, SAS Institute Cary, NC, USA). The model used for the analysis was: Y = [mu] + treatment + storage temperature + treatment x storage temperature + [epsilon], where Y = observation, [mu] = general mean, treatment = effect of CK or LP or PP, storage temperature = effect of 20[degrees]C or 28[degrees]C or 37[degrees]C, treatment x storage temperature = interaction between treatment and storage temperature, [epsilon] = residual error. Bon grouping contrasts were utilized to compare means among four levels of one factor with the other factor immobilized. The significant difference was declared at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Chemical, microbial and mycotoxin composition of corn

Chemical and microbial composition and mycotoxin content of ensiling plant are presented in Table 3 and 4, respectively. Nitrate, DON, and ZEA content of corn was 383 mg/kg, 163 and 30.6 ng/g accordingly.

Microbial and chemical composition of corn silage

Table 5 shows the microbial counts and fermentation characteristics of corn silage treated with inoculants and storage temperature. LAB count in PP-treated silage silage stored at 20[degrees]C was higher than CK and LP (p<0.05), and their count in PP-treated silage silage stored at 28[degrees]C was higher than LP (p<0.05), whereas LP-treated silage stored at 37[degrees]C had a higher count of LAB compared with CK and PP (p<0.05). Without any treatment, LAB number in silage conserved at 28[degrees]C was higher in comparison with 20[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05), and their number in silage conserved at 20[degrees]C was higher compared with 37[degrees]C (p<0.05). The addition of PP resulted in a lower population of LAB in silage conserved at 37[degrees]C in contrast with 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). Yeast number in any silage decreased as storage temperature increased from 20[degrees]C to 37[degrees]C (p<0.05), regardless of additive effect. Yeast number in LP-treated silage ensiled at any temperature was higher than CK (p<0.05), and its number in PP-treated silage ensiled at 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C was higher than CK (p<0.05), whereas PP-treated silage ensiled at 20[degrees]C had a higher count of yeast in comparison with LP (p<0.05). With the addition of PP or no additive, yeast population in silage ensiled at 20[degrees]C was higher compared to 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05). Mold count in PP-treated silage stored at 20[degrees]C was lower than CK and LP (p<0.05). Without any additive, silage stored at 20[degrees]C had a higher count of mold in contrast with 37[degrees]C (p<0.05), whereas the application of PP led to a higher number of mold in silage stored at 28[degrees]C compared with 20[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05). CB number in CK-treated silage stored at 37[degrees]C was lower compared to LP and PP (p< 0.05), and CK-treated silage stored at 20[degrees]C had a higher number of CB in comparison with 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05).

According to Table 5, the pH value in any silage was below 4.0, ranging from 3.69 to 3.85. The pH value in PP-treated silage conserved at 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C was higher than CK and LP (p<0.05). With the addition of LP or no additive, silage conserved at 37[degrees]C had a higher pH level compared to 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). The application of PP not only resulted in a higher pH level in silage conserved at 37[degrees]C in comparison with 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), but also caused a higher value of pH in silage conserved at 20[degrees]C compared to 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). N[H.sub.3]-N content in any silage increased significantly as conservation temperature increased from 20[degrees]C to 37[degrees]C (p<0.05), irrespective of treatment effect. N[H.sub.3]-N content in LP-treated silage stored at any temperature was lower than CK (p<0.05), whereas PP-treated silage stored at 28[degrees]C had a lower level of N[H.sub.3]-N in comparison with CK (p<0.05). The addition of LP lowered N[H.sub.3]-N level in silage stored at 20[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C compared to PP (p<0.05). Without any additive, N[H.sub.3]-N value in silage ensiled at 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C was higher compared to 20[degrees]C (p<0.05). With the use of LP, N[H.sub.3]-N value in silage ensiled at 37[degrees]C was higher compared to 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), and its content in silage ensiled at 28[degrees]C was higher than 20[degrees]C (p<0.05). The application of PP led to a higher content of N[H.sub.3]-N in silage ensiled at 37[degrees]C compared with 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). PA content in LP-treated silage ensiled at 20[degrees]C was higher than 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05), whereas there were not significant differences on PA content for all the other contrasts (p>0.05).

Table 6 presents the effect of inoculants on the nutritive value of corn silage stored at three temperatures. DM content in CK-treated silage stored at 37[degrees]C was lower in comparison with LP and PP (p<0.05), and there were not significant differences on DM content for all the other contrasts (p>0.05). CP level in any silage decreased significantly with storage temperature increasing from 20[degrees]C to 37[degrees]C (p<0.05), irrespective of additive effect. CP level in CK-treated silage conserved at 28[degrees]C was lower compared to LP and PP (p<0.05), whereas its content in LP-treated silage conserved at 37[degrees]C was higher than CK and PP (p<0.05). With no additive, silage conserved at 20[degrees]C had a higher content of CP compared with 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05). The application of LP induced a higher value of CP in silage conserved at 20[degrees]C in contrast with 37[degrees]C (p< 0.05), and PP-treated silage conserved at 37[degrees]C had a lower value of CP than 20 and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). WSC content in LP-treated silage ensiled at any temperature was higher compared to CK and PP (p<0.05), whereas its content in PP-treated silage ensiled at 37[degrees]C was higher than CK (p<0.05). With the addition of PP or no additive, silage ensiled at 37[degrees]C had a higher level of WSC in comparison with 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), and WSC level in silage ensiled at 20[degrees]C was higher in contrast with 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). The application of LP resulted in a higher value of WSC in silage ensiled at 37[degrees]C compared to 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), whereas there were no differences on WSC value for all the remaining comparisons (p>0.05). Nitrate content in silage, ranging from 61.1 to 91.4 mg/kg, was lower compared with 383 mg/kg in corn. At 20[degrees]C, nitrate level in LP-treated silage was higher compared to CK and PP (p<0.05), and its level in silage treated with CK was higher than PP (p<0.05). LP-treated silage stored at 28[degrees]C had a higher level of nitrate than CK and PP (p<0.05). At 37[degrees]C, nitrate level in silage treated with LP was higher compared to CK and PP (p<0.05), and its level in silage treated with CK was lower in comparison with PP (p<0.05). The use of LP led to a higher value of nitrate in silage stored at 20[degrees]C compared to 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), whereas PP-treated silage stored at 37[degrees]C had a higher value of nitrate than 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), and the application of PP caused a lower value of nitrate in silage stored at 20[degrees]C in contrast with 28[degrees]C (p<0.05).

Mycotoxin content of corn silage

Mycotoxin content of corn silage treated with LAB and storage temperature is stated in Table 7. NIV content in PP-treated silage stored at 20[degrees]C was higher than CK and LP (p<0.05), whereas its content in PP-treated silage stored at 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C was lower compared to CK and LP (p<0.05). NIV level in LP-treated silage was higher and lower in comparison with CK (p<0.05), at 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C, respectively. Without any additive, NIV value in silage stored at 37[degrees]C was higher compared to 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), and its value in silage stored at 20[degrees]C was lower than 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). The use of LP resulted in a lower value of NIV in silage stored at 20[degrees]C in contrast with 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05). NIV level in PP-treated silage stored at 37[degrees]C was higher compared with 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p< 0.05), and its level in silage stored at 20[degrees]C was higher than 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). DON content in PP-treated silage conserved at 20[degrees]C was higher compared to CK and LP (p<0.05), and its content in LP-treated silage conserved at 28[degrees]C was higher in comparison with CK and PP (p<0.05). At 37[degrees]C, DON level in silage treated with LP was higher than CK and PP (p<0.05), and its level in silage treated with CK was lower compared with PP (p<0.05). With no additive, silage conserved at 20[degrees]C had a higher value of DON in contrast with 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05). DON value in silage treated with LP increased significantly from 76.2 to 179 ng/g as storage temperature increased from 20[degrees]C to 37[degrees]C. With the application of PP, DON level in silage ensiled at 20[degrees]C was much higher compared to 28[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05), and its level in silage ensiled at 28[degrees]C was lower than 37[degrees]C (p<0.05). At 20[degrees]C, the 3-ADON level in silage treated with CK was higher in comparison with LP and PP (p<0.05), whereas there were no differences on 3-ADON level for all the remaining comparisons (p>0.05). PP-treated silage stored at 20[degrees]C had a higher level of T-2 compared to CK and LP (p<0.05). OTA value in PP-treated silage ensiled at 28[degrees]C was higher compared with CK and LP (p<0.05). When storage temperature increased to 37[degrees]C, silage treated with CK had a higher content of OTA in contrast with LP and PP (p<0.05), and LP-treated silage had a lower content of OTA than PP (p<0.05). Without any additive, OTA level in silage ensiled at 37[degrees]C was higher compared to 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). OTA level in PP-treated silage ensiled at 37[degrees]C was higher in comparison with 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), and its level in PP-treated silage ensiled at 20[degrees]C was lower than 28[degrees]C (p<0.05). ZEA content in PP-treated silage conserved at 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C was higher compared with CK and LP (p<0.05). The utilization of LP led to a higher value of ZEA in silage conserved at 37[degrees]C in comparison with 28[degrees]C (p<0.05), whereas ZEA value in PP-treated silage conserved at 28[degrees]C was higher than 20[degrees]C and 37[degrees]C (p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

In the present experiment (Table 5), LP-treated corn silage stored at any temperature had a lower level of N[H.sub.3]-N and a higher number of yeast in comparison with CK, which is in agreement with Filya et al [20]. Without any additive, LAB number in corn silage stored at 37[degrees]C was lower than 20[degrees]C and 28[degrees]C, and a study found the similar phenomenon [21]. According to Table 6, the application of LP resulted in a higher content of WSC in corn silage stored at any temperature compared to CK, it was reported that its concentration in corn silage treated with LP was lower than CK [20]. EE content decreased from 2.69% in corn to 2.09% to 2.29% of corn silage, perhaps microbial activity during fermentation degraded some EE. Nitrate level in corn was 383 mg/kg, and decreased to 61.1 to 91.4 mg/kg after ensiling. Both corn and silage were safe in terms of nitrate content, because their concentrations were below the limit level (1,000 mg/kg). A study showed that nitrate contents in corn were 374 and 433 mg/kg, and reduced to 18.5 to 111 mg/kg of corn silages [22].

The eight mycotoxins in this experiment can be divided into Aspergillus and Fusarium toxins, with [AFB.sub.1] and OTA belonging to Aspergillus toxins, and Fusarium toxins consisting of the remaining six toxins. As can be seen from Table 4 and 7, [AFB.sub.1] existed in pre- and post-fermented corn samples, and its content was higher in corn (30.2 ng/g) compared with corn silage (23.4 to 24.5 ng/g). This result indicated that [AFB.sub.1] had a slow degradation during fermentation, and agrees with Kalac and Woodford [23]. However, [AFB.sub.1] level was higher in corn silage when compared with pre-fermented samples [24], suggesting that A. flavus and A. parasiticus activity was enhanced during storage. Silage contamination with [AFB.sub.1] was also found in Argentina [25], Egypt [26] and France [27]. These phenomena above show that [AFB.sub.1] infection may be influenced by field environment where forage crop grow, and is usually concerned with tropical or subtropical regions with a higher temperature. Treatment and storage temperature did not have an effect on [AFB.sub.1] level in corn silage at this experiment, however. OTA is a common contaminant of corn in temperate regions, and its level in corn was 34.4 ng/g at this experiment. Conservation temperature has a significant effect on OTA content in corn silage, and the application of LP and PP decreased its level in corn silage stored at 37[degrees]C compared to CK.

Most information for Fusarium toxins is for DON in corn silage. DON content in CK-treated corn silage stored at any temperature was lower than that of corn (Tables 4, 7), and two workers found a significant decrease in DON content after ensiling [28], perhaps because Fusarium species belong to field molds and their activity was suppressed by low oxygen and pH environment of silage [29]. In this experiment, storage temperature had a remarkable effect on DON level, and its level was not reduced in corn silage treated with LP and PP, whereas one study demonstrated that storage temperature did not affect DON stability [28]. Furthermore, their results showed that ensiling with low DM and prolonging storage time led to mycotoxin degradation of corn silage. DON level was also influenced by silage distribution in a silo, proved by two studies. One study showed that a higher content of DON was detected on the top of corn silage [27], and a lower concentration of it was found at the bottom of corn silage by the same workers [27]. On the whole, ZEA level kept unchanged in corn silage in this study, and this result was in accordance with Gonzales Pereyra et al [25].

https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0801

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by China Forage and Grass Research System (CARS-35), Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303061), Project on achievements transformation and extension of Tianjin agricultural science and technology (201404040), Project on science and technology plan of Inner Mongolia and Project on test demonstration and service support of agricultural technology (Popularizing demonstration and application of whole-plant corn silage). The authors thank David B. Hannaway from Oregon State University for assistance of words review. Thanks also go to Heather Hallen-Adams from University of Nebraska due to her comments and suggestions on mycotoxin degradation.

REFERENCES

[1.] Reddy KRN, Salleh B, Saad B, et al. An overview of mycotoxin contamination in foods and its implications for human health. Toxin Rev 2010;29:3-26.

[2.] Tsiplakou E, Anagnostopoulos C, Liapis K, Haroutounian SA, Zervas G. Determination of mycotoxins in feedstuffs and ruminant's milk using an easy and simple LC-MS/MS multi-residue method. Talanta 2014;130:8-19.

[3.] Riley RT. Chapter 7 Mechanistic interactions of mycotoxins: theoretical considerations. Mycotoxins in agriculture and food safety. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1998.

[4.] Scott PM. Industrial and farm detoxification processes for mycotoxins. Rev Med Vet 1998;149:543-8.

[5.] Alonso VA, Pereyra CM, Keller LAM, et al. Fungi and mycotoxins in silage: an overview. J Appl Microbiol 2013;115:63743.

[6.] Huwig A, Freimund S, Kappeli O, Dutler H. Mycotoxin detoxication of animal feed by different adsorbents. Toxicol Lett 2001;122:179-88.

[7.] Guerre P. Interest of the treatments of raw materials and usage of adsorbents to decontaminate animal food containing mycotoxins. Rev Med Vet 2000;151:1095-106.

[8.] Cheli F, Campagnoli A, Dell' Orto V Fungal populations and mycotoxins in silages: From occurrence to analysis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013;183:1-16.

[9.] Kollarczik B, Gareis M, Hanelt M. In vitro transformation of the Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and zearalenone by the normal gut microflora of pigs. Nat Toxins 1994;2:105-10.

[10.] Storm IDM, Sorensen JL, Rasmussen RR, Nielsen KF, Thrane U. Mycotoxins in silage. Stewart Postharvest Rev 2008;4:1-12.

[11.] Niderkorn V, Boudra H, Morgavi DP. Binding of Fusarium mycotoxins by fermentative bacteria in vitro. J Appl Microbiol 2006;101:849-56.

[12.] Damoglou AP, Shannon W, Downey GA. The interaction between Fusarium and their mycotoxins in grass silage. J Sci Food Agric 1984;35:279-84.

[13.] Niderkorn V, Morgavi DP, Pujos E, Tissandier A, Boudra H. Screening of fermentative bacteria for their ability to bind and biotransform deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisins in an in vitro simulated corn silage model. Food Addit Contam 2007;24:406-15.

[14.] Reyneri A. The role of climatic condition on mycotoxin production in cereal. Vet Res Commun 2006;30(Suppl 1):87-92.

[15.] Sweeney MJ, Dobson ADW. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium species. Int J Food Microbiol 1998;43:141-58.

[16.] Zhang Q, Li XJ, Zhao MM, Yu Z. Lactic acid bacteria strains for enhancing the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Leymus chinensis silage. Grass Forage Sci 2016;71:472-81.

[17.] Van Soest PJ, Robertson PJ, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97.

[18.] Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 2003;86:412-31.

[19.] Yogendrarajah P, Poucke CV, Meulenaer BD, Saeger SD. Development and validation of a QuEChERS based liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of multiple mycotoxins in spices. J Chromatogr A 2013;1297:1-11.

[20.] Filya I, Sucu E, Karabulut A. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation, aerobic stability and ruminal degradability of maize silage. J Appl Microbiol 2006;101:1216-23.

[21.] Wang C, Nishino N. Effects of storage temperature and ensiling period on fermentation products, aerobic stability and microbial communities of total mixed ration silage. J Appl Microbiol 2013;114:1687-95.

[22.] Borreani G, Tabacco E. Bio-based biodegradable film to replace the standard polyethylene cover for silage conservation. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:386-94.

[23.] Kalac P, Woodford MK. A review of some aspects of possible associations between the feedings of silage and animal health. Br Vet J 1982;138:305-20.

[24.] Keller LAM, Keller KM, Monge MP, et al. Gliotoxin contamination in pre- and postfermented corn, sorghum and wet brewer's grains silage in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. J Appl Microbiol 2012;112:865-73.

[25.] Gonzales Pereyra ML, Alonso VA, Sager R, et al. Fungi and selected mycotoxins in pre- and postfermented corn silage. J Appl Microbiol 2008;104:1034-41.

[26.] El-Shanawany AA, Mostafa ME, Barakat A. Fungal population and mycotoxins in silage in Assiut and Sohag governorates in Egypt, with a special reference to characteristic Aspergilli toxins. Mycopathologia 2005;159:281-9.

[27.] Richard E, Heutte N, Bouchart V, Garon D. Evaluation of fungal contamination and mycotoxin production in maize silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009;148:309-20.

[28.] Boudra H, Morgavi DP. Reduction in Fusarium toxin levels in corn silage with low dry matter and storage time. J Agric Food Chem 2008;56:4523-8.

[29.] Fink-Gremmels J. Mycotoxins in forages. In: Diaz DE, editor. The mycotoxin blue book. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press; 2005. pp. 249-68.

Musen Wang (1), Shengyang Xu (1), Tianzheng Wang (1), Tingting Jia (1), Zhenzhen Xu (2), Xue Wang (2), and Zhu Yu (1)*

* Corresponding Author: Zhu Yu

Tel: +86-010-6273-3414, Fax: +86-010-6273-2799, E-mail: yuzhu33150@sina.com

(1) Department of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

(2) Institute of Quality Standards and Testing Technology for Agricultural Products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China

ORCID

Zhu Yu

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-1272

Submitted Nov 3, 2017; Revised Dec 18, 2017; Accepted Jan 26, 2018

Caption: Figure 1. The chromatogram of nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyl-deoxynivalneol, aflatoxin [B.sub.1], HT-2 toxin, T-2 toxin, ochratoxin A, and zearalenone at 100 ng/mL.
Table 1. Elution condition for the mobile phase

Time (min)   Solvent A (%)   Solvent B (%)

0                 90              10
2                 90              10
3                 80              20
7                 76              24
10.5              70              30
13.5              40              60
15                30              70
18                25              75
18.1               5              95
21.9               5              95
22                90              10
25                90              10

Table 2. Chromatographic and mass spectrometric parameters
for the detection of mycotoxins

Analyte       Precursorion      Production      Production
                             (quantification)   (qualifier)

NIV               371              281             59.1
DON               355              265              59
3-ADON            339              231              213
[AFB.sub.1]       313              285              241
HT-2              442              263              215
T-2               484              305              185
OTA               404              239              358
ZEA               317              175              130

Analyte       Dwell time   Collision    Retention    Limit of
                 (ms)      energy (V)   time (min)   detection
                                                      (ng/g)

NIV              100           10          2.79          1
DON               60           10          4.52          1
3-ADON           100           10          10.6          1
[AFB.sub.1]       30           22          14.3         0.5
HT-2              40           10          15.4          1
T-2               40           10          16.1         0.3
OTA               20           20          16.6         0.5
ZEA               20           25          16.8         0.5

Analyte         Limit of
              quantification
                  (ng/g)

NIV                 5
DON                 5
3-ADON              5
[AFB.sub.1]         1
HT-2                5
T-2                 1
OTA                 1
ZEA                 1

NIV, nivalenol; DON, deoxynivalenol; 3-ADON, 3-acetyl-deoxynivalneol;
[AFB.sub.1], aflatoxin [B.sub.1]; HT-2, HT-2 toxin; T-2, T-2 toxin;
OTA, ochratoxin A; ZEA, zearalenone.

Table 3. Chemical and microbial composition of corn material

      Item                  DM                   NDF

                                        %

Mean [+ or -] SD   32.81 [+ or -] 1.71    45.19 [+ or -] 1.8

      Item                  ADF                     CP

                                          %

Mean [+ or -] SD   0 22.85 [+ or -] 1.28    8.29 [+ or -] 0.36

      Item                WSC                   EE

                                      %

Mean [+ or -] SD   6.75 [+ or -] 0.43   2.69 [+ or -] 0.11

      Item               Nitrate                LAB

                        mg/kg, DM        Log10 cfu/g, FM

Mean [+ or -] SD   383.6 [+ or -] 8.72   4.17 [+ or -] 0.05

      Item               Yeast                 Mold

                            Log10 cfu/g, FM

Mean [+ or -] SD   5.99 [+ or -] 0.89   5.18 [+ or -] 1.12

      Item                 CB

                   Log10 cfu/g, FM

Mean [+ or -] SD   7.35 [+ or -] 1.28

DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent
fiber; CP, crude protein; WSC, water soluble carbohydrates; EE,
ether extract; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; CB, coliform bacteria; FM,
fresh matter; SD, standard deviation. Data were shown with
triplicate.

Table 4. Mycotoxin content of corn material

Item                       NIV                   DON

                   ng/g, dry matter

Mean [+ or -] SD   37.53 [+ or -] 2.86   163.2 [+ or -] 11.18

Item                     3-ADON             [AFB.sub.1]

                   ng/g, dry matter

Mean [+ or -] SD   36.98 [+ or -] 0.47   30.26 [+ or -] 0.77

Item                      HT-2                   T-2

                   ng/g, dry matter

Mean [+ or -] SD   13.94 [+ or -] 0.82   23.01 [+ or -] 0.14

Item                       OTA                   ZEA

                   ng/g, dry matter

Mean [+ or -] SD   34.45 [+ or -] 0.27   30.63 [+ or -] 2.64

NIV, nivalenol; DON, deoxynivalenol; 3-ADON, 3-acetyl-deoxynivalneol;
[AFB.sub.1], aflatoxin [B.sub.1]; HT-2, HT-2 toxin; T-2, T-2 toxin;
OTA, ochratoxin A; ZEA, zearalenone; SD, standard deviation.

Data were shown with triplicate.

Table 5. Microbial populations and fermentation characteristics of
corn silage treated with inoculants and storage temperature

                      Storage temperature ([degrees]C)

Item    Treatment       20           28            37

LAB        CK       6.51 (bB)    7.37 (abA)    5.33 (bC)
           LP       6.26 (b)      6.43 (b)      5.90 (a)
           PP       7.33 (aA)    7.79 (aA)     5.26 (bB)
Yeast      CK       5.35 (cA)    3.83 (bB)     3.55 (bB)
           LP       6.03 (b)      5.52 (a)      5.00 (a)
           PP       6.34 (aA)    4.88 (aB)     4.87 (abB)
Mold       CK       4.01 (aA)    3.47 (AB)      2.80 (B)
           LP       3.38 (ab)       3.36           2.8
           PP       2.80 (bB)     3.99 (A)      3.00 (B)
CB         CK       5.74 (A)      4.42 (B)     4.08 (bB)
           LP          5.13         5.34       5.03 (ab)
           PP          5.3          5.07        5.07 (a)
pH         CK       3.71 (bE)    3.71 (bE)      3.81 (A)
           LP       3.69 (bB)    3.70 (bE)      3.83 (A)
           PP       3.80 (aB)    3.75 (aC)      3.85 (a)
NH3-N      CK       2.98 (aB)    3.98 (aA)     4.38 (aA)
           LP       1.90 (bC)    2.78 (bE)     3.50 (bA)
           PP       3.01 (aE)    3.34 (bB)     4.26 (aA)
LA         CK          4.91         5.16          5.23
           LP          5.53         5.76          5.54
           PP          5.19         5.57          5.56
AA         CK          1.45         1.42          1.56
           LP          1.53         1.41           1.4
           PP          1.39         1.26           1.3
PA         CK          0.31         0.31          0.28
           LP       0.39 (A)      0.30 (B)      0.28 (B)
           PP          0.35          0.3          0.28

                              p-value

Item    Treatment      T         S       TxS

LAB        CK       0.0148    <0.0001   0.0023
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
Yeast      CK       <0.0001   <0.0001   0.3244
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
Mold       CK       0.5366    0.0097    0.0424
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
CB         CK       0.2889    0.0946    0.1605
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
pH         CK       0.0005    <0.0001   0.2219
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
NH3-N      CK       <0.0001   <0.0001   0.2937
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
LA         CK       0.1725    0.3900    0.6227
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
AA         CK       0.1202    0.4850    0.7580
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --
PA         CK       0.4567    0.0027    0.2637
           LP         --        --        --
           PP         --        --        --

Table 6. Nutritive value of corn silage treated with inoculants
and storage temperature

                          Storage temperature ([degrees]C)

Item      Treatment       20           28            37

DM           CK          33.4         33.5        32.4 (b)
             LP          32.9         33.3        34.2 (a)
             PP          34.2         34.7        34.3 (a)
CP           CK       7.53 (a)     7.04 (bB)     6.99 (bB)
             LP       7.75 (a)     7.57 (aAB)    7.36 (aB)
             PP       7.52 (a)     7.52 (aA)     7.19 (bB)
WSC          CK       0.98 (bB)    0.83 (bC)     1.19 (cA)
             LP       1.31 (aB)    1.41 (aB)     1.65 (aA)
             PP       0.98 (bB)    0.78 (bC)     1.43 (bA)
EE           CK          2.12         2.26          2.22
             LP          2.17          2.1          2.11
             PP          2.09         2.29          2.26
Nitrate      CK       73.9 (b)      71.4 (b)      67.6 (c)
             LP       91.4 (aA)    80.5 (aB)     85.8 (aAB)
             PP       61.1 (cC)     70.4 (bB)    78.0 (bA)

                                p-value

Item      Treatment      T         S       TxS

DM           CK       0.0318    0.7671    0.3377
             LP         --        --        --
             PP         --        --        --
CP           CK       0.0007    0.0002    0.2021
             LP         --        --        --
             PP         --        --        --
WSC          CK       <0.0001   <0.0001   0.0005
             LP         --        --        --
             PP         --        --        --
EE           CK       0.6179    0.6213    0.7625
             LP         --        --        --
             PP         --        --        --
Nitrate      CK       <0.0001   0.2883    0.0002
             LP         --        --        --
             PP         --        --        --

T, treatment effect; S, storage temperature effect; TxS,
interaction effect between treatment and storage temperature;
DM, dry matter; CK, control; LP, Lactobacillus plantarum
KR107070; PP, Pediococcus pentosaceus 17604; CP, crude protein;
WSC, water soluble carbohydrates; EE, ether extract.
CP, WSC, and CF were expressed on DM% and nitrate was shown as
mg/kg (DM).
Means within columns (a,b,c,d) or rows (A,B,C,D) with different
letters are significantly different (p< 0.05).

Table 7. Mycotoxin content of corn silage treated with lactic acid
bacteria and storage temperature

                             Storage temperature ([degrees]C)

Item          Treatment       20            28           37

NIV              CK       39.5 (bC)     55.8 (bB)    137.1 (aA)
                 LP       39.1 (bB)     91.7 (aA)    87.4 (bA)
                 PP       59.6 (aB)     50.8 (cC)    68.8 (cA)
DON              CK       56.4 (bA)     42.5 (bB)    38.3 (cB)
                 LP       76.2 (bC)     126 (aB)      179 (aA)
                 PP        261 (aA)     44.1 (bC)    66.2 (bB)
3-ADON           CK          38.9          36.8         37.6
                 LP           37            37          37.5
                 PP          37.1          37.2         37.3
[AFB.sub.1]      CK          24.5          23.9         24.2
                 LP          23.6          23.6         24.3
                 PP           24           23.4         23.7
HT-2             CK          13.4          13.3         13.6
                 LP          13.4          13.8          13
                 PP          13.8          13.6         13.5
T-2              CK          21.9          22.3         22.2
                 LP          21.9          22.7          22
                 PP          22.2          22.4         22.1
OTA              CK        34.7 (B)     34.9 (bB)    51.6 (aA)
                 LP        36.2 (B)     36.2 (bB)    39.2 (cA)
                 PP        36.5 (C)     40.7 (aB)    44.1 (bA)
ZEA              CK        27.5 (b)     30.4 (b)        29.6
                 LP       28.0 (bAB)    27.4 (bB)     29.4 (A)
                 PP        37.0 (aB)    62.0 (aA)     30.6 (b)

                                     p-value

Item          Treatment      T          S         TxS

NIV              CK       <0.0001    <0.0001    <0.0001
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --
DON              CK       < 0.0001   < 0.0001   < 0.0001
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --
3-ADON           CK        0.1870     0.1871     0.1022
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --
[AFB.sub.1]      CK        0.3383     0.4968     0.7451
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --
HT-2             CK        0.7065     0.7426     0.6698
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --
T-2              CK        0.7535     0.0121     0.4168
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --
OTA              CK        0.0001    < 0.0001   < 0.0001
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --
ZEA              CK       < 0.0001   < 0.0001   < 0.0001
                 LP          --         --         --
                 PP          --         --         --

Mycotoxins were shown on dry matter basis (ng/g).

T, treatment effect; S, storage temperature effect; TxS, interaction
effect between treatment and storage temperature; NIV, nivalenol;
CK, control; LP, Lactobacillus plantarum KR107070; PP, Pediococcus
pentosaceus 17604; DON, deoxynivalenol; 3-ADON,
3-acetyl-deoxynivalneol; [AFB.sub.1], aflatoxin [B.sub.1];
HT-2, HT-2 toxin; T-2, T-2 toxin; OTA, ochratoxin A;
ZEA, zearalenone.

Means within columns (a,b,c,d) or rows (A,B,C,D) with different
letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2018 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Wang, Musen; Xu, Shengyang; Wang, Tianzheng; Jia, Tingting; Xu, Zhenzhen; Wang, Xue; Yu, Zhu
Publication:Asian - Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Dec 1, 2018
Words:7395
Previous Article:Effect of microbial inoculants on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of sweet potato vine silage.
Next Article:Comparative analysis of silage fermentation and in vitro digestibility of tropical grass prepared with Acremonium and Tricoderma species producing...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters