Printer Friendly

Effect of fire on a monodominant floating mat of Cyperus giganteus Vahl in a neotropical wetland/Efeito do fogo sobre uma comunidade monodominante de Cyperus giganteus Vahl em uma area umida neotropical.

1. Introduction

In some wetlands fire is a frequent and important disturbance, and only tolerant species persist; a wildfire can open gaps in the vegetation, followed by secondary succession at recovery (Cronk and Fennessy, 2001). In swamps, burnings are not frequent, due to standing water, but can be a significant factor during droughts (Mitsch and Gosselink, 2000). For instance, in the Okavango delta, floodplains can have high frequency of fire (Heinl et al., 2007).

Effects of fire can be detrimental or favorable. In a monodominant bamboo Bambusa arnhemica stand, in a floodable area in Australia, fire destroys some culms and reduces subsequent survival, leading to a decline of tussock basal area (Franklin et al., 2010). In yearly burned grasslands in austral Brazil, some herbs present higher abundance compared to areas protected from fire (Fidelis et al., 2007). In wet grasslands of cerrado, burning favors some Eriocaulaceae but hinders others (Neves et al., 2011).

Consequences of fire on aquatic herbaceous monodominant formations are yet little known in the Neotropics. Communities have dynamic species composition, with change of species continuously entering and leaving the system, very evident when there is an external disturbance, such as fire, capable to affect the ecological succession (Pinto-Coelho, 2000). The study of effects of fire allows to understand survival mechanisms, such as underground storage organs in Richardia grandiflora and Vernonia flexuosa which have regrowth capacity after loss of aerial biomass by fire (Fidelis et al., 2007).

The Pantanal has a dynamic vegetation in time and space, due to factors which include hydrological fluctuations, successional processes and intensity of land use, such as fire (Pott and Pott, 2003). Burning in the region is traditionally used as management practice of natural grasslands, for renewal or control of coarse grasses (Allem and Valls, 1987; Couto et al., 2006). Wildfires are concentrated at the end of the dry season in August and September, under low relative humidity, associated with accumulated flammable dry matter (Couto et al., 2006; Crispim et al., 2009).

Effects of fire on the Pantanal flora are controversial, as they depend on vegetation type, if dry or wet grassland, cerrado savanna or forest, being detrimental on flood tolerant plants with exposed buds (Pott, 2007). Nevertheless, a high number of aquatic species is cited as fire tolerant in the Pantanal, such as Cyperus giganteus, giant flatsedge, a rhizomatous herb which forms monodominat stands (Pott and Pott, 2000). Dominance of C. giganteus has indications in the literature of being favored by fire (Pott and Pott, 2000).

In the Pantanal, the Jacadigo lake has an extense area covered by aquatic vegetation with monodominant community of C. giganteus. In 2010, during a survey on this vegetation, a wildfire occurred, destroying all above ground biomass and we decided to assess its effects. So, our study aims to describe variations in community structure of C. giganteus before and after fire, testing the following hypothesis: fire contributes to increase dominance of C. giganteus.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study area

The Pantanal, in Central West of Brazil, is an extremely flat floodplain, over hundreds of kilometers, with declivity of 3-15 cm_[km.sup.-1] North-South and 30-50 cm_[km.sup.-1] East-West, what determines delayed outflow (Adamoli, 2000). The climate of the Pantanal is characterized by dry winters and rainy summers, named "Aw" by Koppen (1948). Mean annual rainfall in 1975-1996 was 1,070.0 mm (Soriano, 1997).

Our study was carried out in Jacadigo lake, a shallow fresh water neotropical lake, with clayey-organic sediment, situated on the right margin of the Paraguay river (Bezerra and Mozeto, 2008), in the sub-region of Nabileque (Silva and Abdon, 1998), ca. 85 m altitude, in the municipality of Corumba (Pereira and Lapere, 2009). The lake is fed by rain runoff and the Urucum creek, plus extraordinary overflow from the Paraguay river (Pereira and Lapere, 2009), ca. 40 km away. The overall vegetation is of foodable savanna type and one of the outstanding herbaceous species is C. giganteus, which occurs in high frequency within Copernicia alba stands (Allem and Valls, 1987) and in this lake.

The Jacadigo lake shrank in the decade 2000 (Pereira and Lapere, 2009). Macedo et al. (2009) verified that low water levels of the Paraguay river in 2008 and 2009, due to less rainfall on the watershed, caused increase of wildfires in the Pantanal, due to drying off of floodable areas, making the vegetation fire-prone, from spread of natural or anthropogenic focuses. The studied vegetation burns every few years, when the lake level is low, like in 2010. The fire occurred in September 2010 and reached the entire patch of C. giganteus in Jacadigo lake. We did not measure duration of the fire, but we estimate that it lasted up to two days, considering the size of the burned patch.

The area of C. giganteus which partially covers the Jacadigo lake has approximately 184,377m2 and the study area 20,080 [m.sup.2], situated on the southeast portion of the lake, close to the road BR-262, at the coordinates 19[degrees] 18' 10" S and 57[degrees] 36' 28.2" W (Figure 1). The studied C. giganteus stand is a floating mat on a histosol layer ca. 70 cm deep, with entangled rhizomes of the sedge.

Monodominant stands of C. giganteus are very common in floodable areas, occurring from Mexico to South America, in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia. It is a rhizomatous emergent aquatic herb, resembling papyrus (C. papyrus L.), with thick and spongy stem, 1.5-2.5m tall (Pott and Pott, 2000; Lorenzi, 2008). The rhizomes are thick and rich in aerenchyma, growing within the first 10 cm of soil (Schessl, 1999). It is one of the few aquatic species of the [C.sub.4] type, doing photosynthesis even on the inflorescence, which may be sterile (Pott and Pott, 2000).

2.2. Sampling of plant cover

We performed monthly samplings from July 2010 to September 2011. We placed 40 quadrats systematically along trails using a PVC frame (1 m x 1 m), separated by a distance of approximately 5 m, each month following trails established during field work. So, with 14 sampling dates, the total reached 560 quadrats, or 560 m2. We estimated visually the percentage of cover of the species per plot, except September 2010, when fire occurred in the area, the only period when the vegetation could not be sampled.

Considering that the sedge is above 1.8 m tall and its inflorescences form a continuous layer, we sampled two strata of the vegetation: one close to the inflorescences of green adult individuals (upper stratum) and the understory near the water (lower stratum) (Figure 2A). In October and November 2010, soon after the wildfire, we sampled only one stratum which was named total, since the reduced size of resprouting individuals of C. giganteus impeded sampling of both strata (Figure 2B).

All plant species found fertile were collected, pressed, oven dried and later identified with help of literature, by comparison with specimens in the Herbarium CGMS of the Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, and consulting specialists. The collected fertile samples were incorporated into the Herbarium CGMS and families were listed according to APG III (2009).

2.3. Analysis of data

We built matrices with monthly data of percentage of cover per species, considering two evaluated strata (upper and lower) of the sedge. With these matrices we performed a Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) using the program PCORD-5. The analyzed parameters were: percentage of cover and Relative Frequency (RF) per species. The variables Relative Cover (RC) and RF were calculated according to Brower and Zar (1977), using Excel-2003 to analyze separately each sampled stratum. The data of percentage of cover were utilized to build a matrix of the total per species per plot (sum of upper and lower strata) per month of sampling. Then, the matrix of presence and absence was used to build a rarefaction curve of species, using the program EstimateSWin7.52.

Differences among monthly relative cover were analyzed by a Friedman test with the Wilcoxon post hoc test, where we compared the cover of each evaluated month in both strata separately. All these non-parametric tests were performed with 5% of significance level using the software PAST.

To calculate diversity we utilized the index of diversity of Shannon (H') at the base "e" and equability of Pielou (J') (Magurran, 1989), with replacement of values of number of individuals by percentage of cover (Munhoz and Felfili, 2008).

3. Results

A total of 44 species distributed in 37 genera and 21 families were found in both sampled periods. Before fire we found 28 species, 26 genera and 16 families. Cyperaceae (5 spp.) and Poaceae (3 spp.) showed the highest richness, six families were represented by two species and eight had single species. In the post-fire period we found 34 species, 30 genera and 19 families, Cyperaceae (6 spp.) standing out as richest family, followed by Fabaceae (4 spp.), which had only two species before fire; seven families showed two species, and ten families had a single species (Table 1). There was no large difference in species richness due to fire (Figure 3).

The ordination analysis (DCA) shows two distinct groups: one in the period before fire, and another thereafter. The considered strata showed to be different in both evaluated periods. Samples were more similar in the post-fire period (Figure 4). Before fire, the community was made up basically by species such as Ludwigia tomentosa, Odontocarya tamoides, and Cissampelos pareira in the upper stratum, and Rhynchospora scutellata, Pityrogramma calomelanos, Thelypteris interrupta, Vernonanthura brasiliana and Fuirena umbellata in the lower stratum.

After fire, we observed a large gap all over the area, period when C. giganteus was in the resprouting phase, what increased incidence of sunlight on the water, benefiting some species such as Echinodorus glaucus, Cephalanthus glabratus and Cyperus odoratus that occurred together with Ludwigia nervosa. Except the last one, all disappeared after reestablishment of the full size of C. giganteus and consequent shading. In this period, the community structure changed, including wetland species such as Scleria macrophylla, Leersia hexandra, Mikania micrantha and Urera aurantiaca in the lower stratum, while the upper stratum did not show many species besides C. giganteus (Figure 4).

The indexes of diversity (H') and equability (J') stayed lower in both strata in the post-fire period compared to before fire. In general, soon after the wildfire, the upper stratum presented smaller indexes compared to the lower stratum, except April and May, at the peak of flood (Figure 5).

Some rhizomatous species survived to fire, however had reduced RC and RF in the lower stratum, such as Rhynchospora scutellata, Pityrogramma calomelanos, Thelypteris interrupta and Fuirena umbellata. The shrub Ludwigia tomentosa appeared in both strata in both periods, though with reduced RC and RF after fire in both strata (Table 2).

The dominance of C. giganteus expressed by relative cover (RC) showed significant differences in both assessed strata among sampled months (Friedman test p < 0.0001 and Wilcoxon test p < 0.05, Table 3, Figure 6). The detected differences occurred between both months before fire and indistinctly in the months after fire, without clear relation with the fire event. The variation of RF followed similar tendency over time (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Although burning changed the community structure of C. giganteus, one year after the fire event the number of species was reestablished. Such situation shows that the community, in terms of richness, is resistant (sensu Townsend et al., 2006) to disturbance, since in spite of the expected variation soon after burn, richness had recovered. Under an external disturbance, such as fire, some communities are able to modify their structure with constant change of species, leaving or entering the system, what characterizes the process of ecological succession (Pinto-Coelho, 2000). In this case, trend of maintenance of species richness is attributed to both resprouting and seedling recruitment.

The differences after fire revealed by DCA can be attributed mainly to features like changes in stratification; emergency from the seed bank, plants which germinate seasonally and opportunistic species which germinate only after fire, and species which resprout after fire or indistinctly throughout the year. Before fire there was a well defined stratification, with vines such as Cissampelos pareira and Odontocarya tamoides, and the shrub Ludwigia tomentosa characterizing the upper stratum, and herbaceous species such as Rhynchospora scutellata, Pityrogramma calomelanos and Echinodorus paniculatus in the lower stratum. The first two months after fire (October and November 2010), when only the total stratum was evaluated, C. giganteus was in the resprouting phase, allowing light to reach the marshy ground. Species replacement in the community occurred when C. giganteus height stabilized, with adult plants reaching above 2 m. Shading by C. giganteus quickly (within one year) selected species with tolerance to shade or to fire, or gap colonizers.

Some species cited in literature as fire sensitive and colonizers of burned areas, e.g Canavalia mattogrossensis and Odontocarya tamoides (Pott and Pott, 1994) were found in our study in both sampling periods. Nevertheless, species like Urera aurantiaca and Cecropiapachystachya found only after disturbance and mentioned as pioneers and common in gaps (Pott and Pott, 1994) clearly appear here due to the light reaching the histosol after fire. Species with annual behavior such as Pistia stratiotes, Cyperus odoratus and Pontederia rotundifolia also appeared only after fire. This indicates that the histosol keeps a seed bank with rather opportunistic species which may determine the post-fire community structure. The seed bank can indicate which species becomes established after a disturbance or when conditions are adequate for germination (Cronk and Fennessy, 2001).

Among the species found before fire, Echinodorus paniculatus, Rhabdadenia madida, Ipomoea rubens, Leersia hexandra, Ludwigia nervosa, L. tomentosa, Pityrogramma calomelanos and Rhynchanthera novemnervia are plants common on histosols of floating meadows in more advanced stages of succession (Pivari et al., 2008; Cunha et al., 2012). Most of them persisted after fire, with a relatively fast restart of succession, some of them from buried regenerative structures and others from soil seed bank.

Soon after fire, the floristic composition of both strata became more similar because the species which have the capacity to reach the upper stratum of the community (vines and shrubs) were in process of growth, after colonizing the lower stratum. So, in the post-fire period, vines and shrubs also characterize the lower stratum, while the upper one does not yet have characteristic species.

Both diversity (H') and equability (J') were lower after fire, since only fast colonization species such as Scleria macrophylla, Leersia hexandra and Urera aurantiaca showed high RC compared to other species of slower colonization. Reduction of diversity during succession in wet grasslands is due to fast growing competitive rhizomatous species (Rosenthal, 2010).

In contrast, before fire, the community presented species of fast colonization, as well as slow ones such as Vernonanthura brasiliana and Rhynchanthera novemnervia, with higher RC values. This way the indexes of diversity (H') and equability (J') were higher in the pre-burn period, what seems to be a trend in herbaceous communities. Species diversity is also higher in rarely burned grass communities affected by both fire and bison grazing in Kansas (Collins and Calabrese, 2012). Fire in grasslands, in the first years after the event, stimulates growth and provokes competitive exclusion, reducing diversity (Huston, 1994).

The fast resprouting of C. giganteus in the whole community after top-kill occurred due to the vigorous rhizome. This strategy is common in herbaceous species which occur in fire-prone zones where rhizomatous grasses resprout after wildfires (Choczynska and Johnson, 2009).

The RF of species increased in the post-fire period, mainly in the upper stratum, due to the fast growth of C. giganteus compared to other species, such as shrubs and vines which have the capacity to reach the upper stratum. In general the RF of these companion species was low shortly after fire.

Although there were differences in relative cover of C. giganteus in the evaluated 12 months, these differences cannot be attributed to the fire event, since there were months with higher and lower RC after fire. In a broad way, our results are similar to long term effects of fire on monodominant community of Cladium jamaicense (Cyperaceae) associated with Typha domingensis, both rhizomatous aquatic plants with unaltered density (Ponzio et al., 2004). Our findings also agree with studies by Salvia et al. (2012) on the effects of fire on the Cyperus giganteus and Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) community in the Parana river delta, Argentina, where usually after a growth period (ca. six months) it again reached a cover similar to unburned areas. Regarding dominance of C. giganteus, we verified that fire practically does not affect the sedge cover. This partially confirms our initial hypothesis, since the species quickly replaced its previous cover only two months after fire. So, the monodominance of C. giganteus, in spite of be an aquatic species, is not affected by fire events.

5. Conclusion

Fire can change the structure of the Cyperus giganteus community because some species appear only after fire and others later on, but richness is recovered within months because some sensitive species are replaced by fast growing, light demanding opportunistic species, and others can resprout or germinate from the seed bank.

Cyperus giganteus can vigorously resprout soon after fire and this event can not affect the cover and consequently the dominance of this species. This confirms partially our initial hypothesis once this species is not clearly favored by fire but its ecological status is maintained after this event.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.08613

Acknowledgements

To the Brazilian official agencies CNPq and CAPES for scholarship to M. Rocha, C.C. Santos Junior and research grants to A. Pott, to CPP/INAU (Brazilian Institute for Wetland Research) for financial support, to Francielli Bao for botanical illustration, to Rosa Helena da Silva and many undergraduate students for help at fieldwork, and to Dr. Catia Nunes da Cunha and Dr. Fernando Ferreira for the previous review of the manuscript.

References

ADAMOLI, J., 2000. O limite sul do Pantanal. In Anais do III Simposio sobre Recursos Naturais e Socio-economicos do Pantanal: Os Desafios do Novo Milenio, 2000, Corumba. p. 1-15.

ALLEM, AC. and VALLS, JFM., 1987. Recursos forrageiros nativos do Pantanal Mato-Grossense. Brasilia: Embrapa/Departamento de Difusao de Tecnologia. 339 p.

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group APG III, 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 161, no. 2, p. 105-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x.

BEZERRA, MAO. and MOZETO, AA., 2008. Deposicao de carbono organico na planicie de inundacao do rio Paraguai durante o Holoceno medio. OecologiaBrasiliensis, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 155-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2008.1201.14.

BROWER, JE. and ZAR, JH., 1977. Field & laboratory methods for general ecology. 2nd ed. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Publishers. 226 p.

CALHEIROS, DF., SALIS, SM., MOURAO, GM., CAMPOLIM, AI., Tomas, WM., SORIANO, BMA. and GALVANI, F., 2006. Parecer tecnico referente ao RIMA do empreendimento denominado EBX Siderurgia Ltda., elaborado pela CAL Consultoria Ambiental Ltda. Corumba: Embrapa. Available from: <http://www.riosvivos.org.br/bkp/arquivos/628736443.pdf>.

CHOCZYNSKA, J. and JOHNSON, EA., 2009. A soil heat and water transfer model to predict belowground grass rhizome bud death in a grass fire. Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 277-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05757.x.

COLLINS, SL. and CALABRESE, LB., 2012. Effects of fire, grazing and topographic variation on vegetation structure in tallgrass prairie. Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 563-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01369.x.

COUTO, EG. and CHIG, LA., CUNHA, CN. and LOUREIRO, MF., 2006. Estudo sobre o impacto do fogo na disponibilidade de nutrientes, no banco de sementes e na biota de solos da RPPN SESC Pantanal. Rio de Janeiro: SESC/Departamento Nacional. 54 p. Conhecendo o Pantanal, no. 2.

CRISPIM, SMA. and SANTOS, SA., SORIANO, BMA. and DOMINGOS BRANCO, O., 2009. Fitofisionomias vegetais e incendios no Pantanal. Corumba: Embrapa Pantanal. 5 p. Comunicado Tecnico, no. 81. Available from: <http://www.cpap.embrapa.br/publicacoes/online/COT81.pdf>.

CRONK, JK. and FENNESSY, MS., 2001. Wetland plants: biology and ecology. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers. 462 p.. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420032925.

CUNHA, NL., DELATORRE, M., RODRIGUES, RB., VIDOTTO, C., GONCALVES, F., SCREMIN-DIAS, E., DAMASCENOJUNIOR, G., POTT, VJ. and POTT, A., 2012. Structure of aquatic vegetation of a large lake, western border of the Brazilian Pantanal. Revista Brasileira de Biologia = Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 72, no. 3, p. 519-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842012000300015. PMid:22990823

FIDELIS, A., MULLER, SC., PILLAR, VD. and PFADENHAUER, J., 2007. Efeito do fogo na ecologia de populacoes de herbaceas e arbustos dos campos sulinos. Revista Brasileira de Biociencias, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 303-305.

FRANKLIN, DC., PRIOR, LD., HOGARTH, NJ. and MCMAHON, CR., 2010. Bamboo, fire and flood: consequences of disturbance for the vegetative growth of a clumping, clonal plant. Plant Ecology, vol. 208, no. 2, p. 319-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9709-x.

HEINL, M., FROST, P, VANDERPOST, C. and SLIVA, J., 2007. Fire activity on drylands and floodplains in the southern Okavango, Delta, Botswana. Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 68, no. 1, p. 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jJaridenv.2005.10.023.

HUSTON, MA., 1994. Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge: University Press. 681 p.

IRGANG, BE., PEDRALLI, G. and WAECHTER, JI., 1984. Macrofitos aquaticos da Estacao Ecologica do Taim, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Roessleria, vol. 6, p. 395-404.

KOPPEN, W., 1948. Climatologia: con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica. 478 p.

LORENZI, H., 2008. Plantas daninhas do Brasil: terrestres, aquaticas, parasitas e toxicas. 4. ed. Nova Odessa: Instituto Plantarum. 640 p.

MACEDO, HA., SILVA, A., NEVES, SMAS. and NEVES, RJ., 2009. Avaliacao das queimadas no Pantanal do Paraguai na regiao de Corumba e Ladario, MS no periodo de maio de 2009. In Anais 2[degrees] Simposio de Geotecnologias no Pantanal, 2009. Corumba: Embrapa Informatica Agropecuaria/INPE. p. 452-459.

MAGURRAN, AE., 1989. Diversidad ecologicay su medicion. Espana: Ediciones Vedra. 199 p.

MITSCH, WJ. and GOSSELINK, JG., 2000. Wetlands. 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 920 p.

MUNHOZ, CBR. and FELFILI, JM., 2008. Fitossociologia do estrato herbaceo-subarbustivo em campo limpo umido no Brasil Central. Acta Bota-nica Brasilica, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 905-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062008000400002.

NEVES, ACO., BEDE, LC. and MARTINS, RP, 2011. Revisao sobre os efeitos do Fogo em Eriocaulaceae como subsidio para a sua conservacao. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservacao da Biodiversidade, no. 2, p. 50-66. Available from: <www.icmbio.gov.br/revistaeletronica/index.php/BioBR/article/.../100>. Access in: 25 Nov. 2012.

PEREIRA, LE. and LAPERE, ACL., 2009. Analise multitemporal da lagoa do Jacadigo no municipio de Corumba, MS. In Anais do 2[degrees] Simposio de Geotecnologias no Pantanal, 2009. Corumba: Embrapa Informatica Agropecuaria/INPE. p. 240-248. Available from: <http://www.geopantanal2009.cnptia.embrapa.br/cd/pdf/p167.pdf>.

PINTO-COELHO, RM., 2000. Fundamentos em ecologia. Porto Alegre: Artes Medicas Sul. 252 p.

PIVARI, MO., POTT, VJ. and POTT, A., 2008. Macrofitas aquaticas de ilhas flutuantes (baceiros) nas sub-regioes do Abobral e Miranda, Pantanal, MS, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 563-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062008000200023.

PONZIO, KJ., MILLER, SJ. and LEE, MA., 2004. Long-term effects of prescribed fire on Cladium jamaicense crantz and Typha domingensis pers. densities. Wetlands Ecology and Management, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 123-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:WETL.0000021671.65897.0c.

POTT, A., 2007. Dinamica da vegetacao do Pantanal. In Anais do VIII Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil, 2007, Caxambu, MG. p. 1-4.

POTT, A. and POTT, VJ., 1994. Plantas do Pantanal. Brasilia: Embrapa. 320 p.

POTT, VJ. and POTT, A., 2000. Plantas aquaticas do Pantanal. Brasilia: Embrapa. 404 p.

POTT, VJ. and POTT, A., 2003. Dinamica da vegetacao aquatica do Pantanal. In THOMAZ, SM. and BINI, LM. (Eds.). Ecologia e manejo de macrofitas aquaticas. Maringa: Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringa. p. 145-162.

ROSENTHAL, G., 2010. Secondary succession in a fallow central European wet grassland. Flora, vol. 205, no. 3, p. 153-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2009.02.003.

SALVIA, M., CEBALLOS, D., GRINGS, F., KARSZENBAUM, H. and KANDUS, P., 2012. Post-fire effects in wetland environments: landscape assessment of plant coverage and soil recovery in the Parana River Delta Marshes, Argentina. Fire Ecology, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 17-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0802017.

SCHESSL, M., 1999. Floristic composition and structure of floodplain vegetation in the northern Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Phyton, vol. 39, no. 2, p. 303-336.

SILVA, JSV. and ABDON, MM., 1998. Delimitacao do Pantanal brasileiro e suas sub-regioes. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, vol. 33, p. 1703-1711.

SORIANO, BMA., 1997. Caracterizacao climatica de Corumba, MS. Corumba: Embrapa. 25 p. Boletim de Pesquisa, no. 11.

TOWNSEND, CR., BEGON, M. and HARPER, JL., 2006. Fundamentos em ecologia. Porto Alegre: Artes Medicas Sul. 592 p.

Rocha, M. (a) *, Santos Junior, C.C. (b), Damasceno-Junior, G.A. (a), Pott, V.J. (a) and Pott, A. (a)

(a) Programa de Pos-graduacao em Biologia Vegetal, Centro de Ciencias Biologicas e da Saude, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul--UFMS, Cidade Universitaria, s/n, CP 549, CEP 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

(b) Curso de Ciencias Biologicas, Programa de Iniciacao Cientifica, Centro de Ciencias Biologicas e da Saude, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul--UFMS, Cidade Universitaria, s/n, CP 549, CEP 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

* e-mail: mairarocha.bot@gmail.com

Received: May 22, 2013--Accepted: January 6, 2014--Distributed: March 31, 2015 (With 6 figures)

Table 1. Plant species, with respective families and growth habits
found in the periods before and after fire in a monodominant
formation of Cyperus giganteus in Jacadigo lake, Nabileque
sub-region, Pantanal, Corumba, State of Mato Grosso do Sul,
Brazil. Life forms listed according to Irgang et al. (1984).

  Family/ Species                         Habit/ Life form

ALISMATACEAE
  Echinodorus glaucus Rataj               Emergent herb
  Echinodorus paniculatus Micheli         Emergent herb
APOCYNACEAE
  Rhabdadenia madida (Vell.) Miers        Emergent vine
ARACEAE
  Pistia stratiotes L.                    Free floating herb
ASTERACEAE
  Mikania micrantha Kunth                 Emergent vine
  Vernonanthura brasiliana (L.)           Amphibious shrub
  H.Rob.
CONVOLVULACEAE
  Ipomoea rubens Choisy                   Emergent vine
  Merremia umbellata (L.) Hallier f.      Amphibious vine
CUCURBITACEAE
  Melothria cf. hirsuta Cogn.             Amphibious vine
CYPERACEAE
  Cyperus giganteus Vahl                  Emergent herb
  Cyperus odoratus L.                     Amphibious herb
  Cyperus rigens C.Presl                  Amphibious herb
  Eleocharis elegans (Kunth)              Emergent herb
  Roem. & Schult.
  Eleocharis interstincta (Vahl)          Emergent herb
  Roem. & Schult.
  Fuirena umbellata Rottb.                Emergent herb
  Rhynchospora scutellata Griseb.         Emergent herb
  Scleria macrophylla J.Presl & C.Presl   Emergent herb
FABACEAE
  Aeschynomene fluminensis Vell.          Amphibious subshrub
  Canavalia mattogrossensis               Emergent vine
  (Barb.Rodr.) Malme
  Vigna adenantha (G.Mey.)                Amphibious climbing herb
  Marechal et al.
  Vigna longifolia (Benth.) Verdc.        Emergent climbing herb
MALVACEAE
  Abutilon cf. ramiflorum A.St.-Hil.      Amphibious shrub
  Helicteres guazumifolia Kunth           Amphibious shrub
  Hibiscus furcellatus Desr.              Emergent shrub
MELASTOMATACEAE
  Rhynchanthera novemnervia DC.           Amphibious subshrub
MENISPERMACEAE
  Cissampelos pareira L.                  Emergent vine
  Odontocarya tamoides (DC.) Miers        Emergent vine
ONAGRACEAE
  Ludwigia nervosa (Poir.) H.Hara         Emergent shrub
  Ludwigia tomentosa (Cambess.) H.Hara    Emergent shrub
POACEAE
  Leersia hexandra Sw.                    Emergent herb
  Steinchisma laxum (Sw.) Zuloaga         Emergent herb
  Stephostachys mertensii (Roth)          Emergent herb
    Zuloaga & Morrone
POLYGONACEAE
  Polygonum hydropiperoides Michx.        Emergent herb
PONTEDERIACEAE
  Pontederia parviflora Alexander         Emergent herb
  Pontederia rotundifolia L.f.            Rooted floating herb
PTERIDACEAE (Pteridophyte)
  Pityrogramma calomelanos (L.) Link      Emergent herb
RUBIACEAE
  Cephalanthus glabratus (Spreng.)        Amphibious shrub
  K.Schum.
  Diodella radula (Willd. ex Roem. &      Emergent herb
  Schult.) Delprete
  Spermacoce glabra Michx.                Herb
THELYPTERIDACEAE (Pteridophyte)
  Thelypteris interrupta (Willd.)         Emergent herb
  K.Iwats.
URTICACEAE
  Cecropia pachystachya Trecul            Amphibious tree
  Urera aurantiaca Wedd.                  Amphibious subshrub
VERBENACEAE
  Boucheafluminensis (Vell.) Moldenke     Subshrub
VITACEAE
  Cissus erosa Rich.                      Emergent vine

  Family/ Species                         Before Fire   After Fire

ALISMATACEAE
  Echinodorus glaucus Rataj                                 X
  Echinodorus paniculatus Micheli              X
APOCYNACEAE
  Rhabdadenia madida (Vell.) Miers             X            X
ARACEAE
  Pistia stratiotes L.                                      X
ASTERACEAE
  Mikania micrantha Kunth                      X            X
  Vernonanthura brasiliana (L.)                X
  H.Rob.
CONVOLVULACEAE
  Ipomoea rubens Choisy                        X
  Merremia umbellata (L.) Hallier f.                        X
CUCURBITACEAE
  Melothria cf. hirsuta Cogn.                  X
CYPERACEAE
  Cyperus giganteus Vahl                       X            X
  Cyperus odoratus L.                                       X
  Cyperus rigens C.Presl                       X
  Eleocharis elegans (Kunth)                                X
  Roem. & Schult.
  Eleocharis interstincta (Vahl)               X
  Roem. & Schult.
  Fuirena umbellata Rottb.                     X            X
  Rhynchospora scutellata Griseb.              X            X
  Scleria macrophylla J.Presl & C.Presl                     X
FABACEAE
  Aeschynomene fluminensis Vell.                            X
  Canavalia mattogrossensis                    X            X
  (Barb.Rodr.) Malme
  Vigna adenantha (G.Mey.)                                  X
  Marechal et al.
  Vigna longifolia (Benth.) Verdc.             X            X
MALVACEAE
  Abutilon cf. ramiflorum A.St.-Hil.           X            X
  Helicteres guazumifolia Kunth                X
  Hibiscus furcellatus Desr.                                X
MELASTOMATACEAE
  Rhynchanthera novemnervia DC.                X
MENISPERMACEAE
  Cissampelos pareira L.                       X            X
  Odontocarya tamoides (DC.) Miers             X            X
ONAGRACEAE
  Ludwigia nervosa (Poir.) H.Hara              X            X
  Ludwigia tomentosa (Cambess.) H.Hara         X            X
POACEAE
  Leersia hexandra Sw.                         X            X
  Steinchisma laxum (Sw.) Zuloaga              X
  Stephostachys mertensii (Roth)               X            X
    Zuloaga & Morrone
POLYGONACEAE
  Polygonum hydropiperoides Michx.                          X
PONTEDERIACEAE
  Pontederia parviflora Alexander                           X
  Pontederia rotundifolia L.f.                              X
PTERIDACEAE (Pteridophyte)
  Pityrogramma calomelanos (L.) Link           X            X
RUBIACEAE
  Cephalanthus glabratus (Spreng.)             X            X
  K.Schum.
  Diodella radula (Willd. ex Roem. &           X
  Schult.) Delprete
  Spermacoce glabra Michx.                                  X
THELYPTERIDACEAE (Pteridophyte)
  Thelypteris interrupta (Willd.)              X            X
  K.Iwats.
URTICACEAE
  Cecropia pachystachya Trecul                              X
  Urera aurantiaca Wedd.                                    X
VERBENACEAE
  Boucheafluminensis (Vell.) Moldenke                       X
VITACEAE
  Cissus erosa Rich.                           X            X

Table 2. Relative cover (RC) and relative frequency (RF)
in the upper and lower strata of the species found in
a monodominant formation of Cyperus giganteus before and
after a fire event in Jacadigo lake, Corumba,
(State of Mato Grosso do Sul). The values of RC and
RF of plants found outside the plots, open spaces
(of the upper stratum), water (of the lower stratum),
and organic matter are not presented.

                                       BEFORE FIRE

                               JULY AND AUGUST 2010 2011

PERIOD                           UPPER             LOWER

Species STRATUM                RC       RF       RC       RF

Abutilon cf. ramiflorum                         0.24     0.95
Aeschynomene fluminensis
Canavalia mattogrossensis                       0.07     0.32
Cecropia pachystachya
Cephalanthus glabratus        0.29     1.04     0.28     1.87
Cissampelos pareira           0.48     1.75     0.13     0.63
Cissus erosa                  0.14     1.04     0.1      0.64
Cyperus giganteus            50.81    27.08    65.52    24.55
Diodella radula                                 0.21     1.27
Echinodorus glaucus
Echinodorus paniculatus                         0.12     0.32
Eleocharis elegans
Eleocharis interstincta       0.02     0.34     0.34     1.57
Fuirena umbellata             1.42     7.98     4.24    11.01
Ipomoea rubens                0.63     1.81     0.07     0.64
Leersia hexandra                                0.07     0.62
Ludwigia nervosa              1.77     2.18     0.94     2.24
Ludwigia tomentosa           11.64    17.50     5.33    13.82
Melothria cf. hirsuta                           0.04     0.63
Merremia umbellata
Mikania micrantha                               0.13     1.28
Odontocarya tamoides           1       3.11     0.37     2.83
Pistia stratiotes
Pityrogramma calomelanos      0.05     0.36     1.32     2.20
Polygonum hydropiperoides
Rhabdadenia madida            0.03     0.34     0.1      0.95
Rhynchospora scutellata       1.08     4.6     10.66    10.34
Scleria macrophylla
Spermacoce glabra
Steinchisma laxum                               0.17     0.93
Stephostachys mertensii
Thelypteris interrupta        0.28     1.75     1.22     3.15
Urera aurantiaca
Vernonanthura brasiliana      0.25     0.36     0.28     0.63
Vigna adenantha
Vigna longifolia              0.2      1.45     0.12     1.88

                                        AFTER FIRE

                                DECEMBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER

PERIOD                            UPPER             LOWER

Species STRATUM                RC       RF       RC       RF

Abutilon cf. ramiflorum                         0.02     0.22
Aeschynomene fluminensis                        0.02     0.22
Canavalia mattogrossensis     0.08     0.36     0.07     0.45
Cecropia pachystachya                           0.03     0.23
Cephalanthus glabratus
Cissampelos pareira                             0.01     0.07
Cissus erosa                  0.04     0.35     0.19     1.57
Cyperus giganteus            54.64    39.41    62.90    30.68
Diodella radula
Echinodorus glaucus                             0.01     0.08
Echinodorus paniculatus
Eleocharis elegans            0.01     0.10     0.01     0.17
Eleocharis interstincta
Fuirena umbellata             0.08     0.39     0.09     0.38
Ipomoea rubens
Leersia hexandra              0.01     0.09     0.50     4.53
Ludwigia nervosa              0.18     0.85     0.18     0.98
Ludwigia tomentosa            3.12     7.82     1.55     5.80
Melothria cf. hirsuta
Merremia umbellata                              0.02     0.15
Mikania micrantha                               0.10     0.23
Odontocarya tamoides          0.01     0.09     0.02     0.22
Pistia stratiotes                              0.003     0.07
Pityrogramma calomelanos                        0.04     0.87
Polygonum hydropiperoides     0.02     0.17     0.03     0.22
Rhabdadenia madida            0.05     0.47     0.04     0.29
Rhynchospora scutellata       0.26     1.71     2.05     4.41
Scleria macrophylla           1.13     4.77     2.54     7.29
Spermacoce glabra                               0.02     0.08
Steinchisma laxum
Stephostachys mertensii       0.02     0.10     0.03     0.21
Thelypteris interrupta                          0.02     0.07
Urera aurantiaca              0,02     0,26     0,22     1,51
Vernonanthura brasiliana
Vigna adenantha               0.10     0.64     0.05     0.37
Vigna longifolia              0.25     3.10     0.84     7.83

Table 3. Diagonal matrix showing the p-values for the
Wilcoxon post hoc test (after Friedman test p<0.05) on the
assessed values for comparison of relative cover (RC) of
Cyperus giganteus in the sampled months. Periods before
(July and August 2010) and after fire (December 2010 to
September 2011). Significant (p<0.05) outcomes
of the test are highlighted.

UPPER STRATUM

             July-10     Aug-10     Dec-10     Jan-11

Jul-10                    0.03       0.19       0.03
Aug-10          -                    0.62       0.89
Dec-10          -          -                    0.39
Jan-11          -          -          -
Feb-11          -          -          -          -
Mar-11          -          -          -          -
Apr-11          -          -          -          -
May-11          -          -          -          -
Jun-11          -          -          -          -
Jul-11          -          -          -          -
Aug-11          -          -          -          -
Sep-11          -          -          -          -

UPPER STRATUM

              Feb-11     Mar-11     Apr-11     May-11

Jul-10         0.02       0.09       0.17       0.16
Aug-10         0.35       0.59       0.26       0.38
Dec-10         0.07       0.87       0.44       0.93
Jan-11         0.51       0.4        0.08       0.40
Feb-11                    0.06        0         0.08
Mar-11          -                    0.12       0.73
Apr-11          -          -                    0.56
May-11          -          -          -
Jun-11          -          -          -          -
Jul-11          -          -          -          -
Aug-11          -          -          -          -
Sep-11          -          -          -          -

UPPER STRATUM

             June-11    July-11     Aug-11    Sept-11

Jul-10         0.02       0.21       0.01       0.90
Aug-10         0.74       0.06       0.14        0
Dec-10         0.25       0.26       0.03        0
Jan-11         0.84       0.04       0.14        0
Feb-11         0.24       0.01       0.49        0
Mar-11         0.26       0.08       0.01        0
Apr-11         0.04       0.56        0         0.02
May-11         0.34       0.24       0.03        0
Jun-11                    0.04       0.31        0
Jul-11          -                     0         0.09
Aug-11          -          -                     0
Sep-11          -          -          -

LOWER STRATUM

             July-10     Aug-10     Dec-10     Jan-11

Jul-10                    0.35       0.14       0.15
Aug-10          -                    0.03       0.01
Dec-10          -          -                    0.38
Jan-11          -          -          -
Feb-11          -          -          -          -
Mar-11          -          -          -          -
Apr-11          -          -          -          -
May-11          -          -          -          -
Jun-11          -          -          -          -
Jul-11          -          -          -          -
Aug-11          -          -          -          -
Sep-11          -          -          -          -

LOWER STRATUM

              Feb-11     Mar-11     Apr-11     May-11

Jul-10         0.04       0.16       0.78       0.98
Aug-10          0         0.03       0.44       0.46
Dec-10         0.43       0.96       0.09       0.01
Jan-11         0.57       0.32       0.01        0
Feb-11                    0.40       0.03        0
Mar-11          -                    0.10       0.02
Apr-11          -          -                    0.20
May-11          -          -          -
Jun-11          -          -          -          -
Jul-11          -          -          -          -
Aug-11          -          -          -          -
Sep-11          -          -          -          -

LOWER STRATUM

             June-11    July-11     Aug-11    Sept-11

Jul-10         0.84       0.98       0.37       0.63
Aug-10         0.79       0.48       0.78       0.72
Dec-10         0.01       0.05        0         0.01
Jan-11          0          0          0          0
Feb-11          0         0.01        0          0
Mar-11         0.02       0.04        0         0.01
Apr-11         0.36       0.83       0.02       0.32
May-11         0.96       0.21       0.29       0.87
Jun-11                    0.28       0.22       0.97
Jul-11          -                    0.03       0.42
Aug-11          -          -                    0.15
Sep-11          -          -          -
COPYRIGHT 2015 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Rocha, M.; Santos, C.C., Jr.; Damasceno-Junior, G.A.; Pott, V.J.; Pott, A.
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Biology
Date:Jan 1, 2015
Words:5892
Previous Article:Distribution, management and diversity of the endangered Amerindian yam (Dioscorea trifida L.)/Distribuicao, manejo e diversidade da especie ameacada...
Next Article:Alterations in land uses based on amendments to the Brazilian Forest Law and their influences on water quality of a watershed/Alteracoes na...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters